Nebulizer delivery of micafungin aerosols

New and emerging roles for inhalational and direct antifungal drug delivery approaches for treatment of invasive fungal infections

INTRODUCTION

The rising prevalence of difficult-to-treat, deep-seated invasive fungal diseases (IFD) has led to high mortality. Currently available antifungal treatments, administered predominantly orally or intravenously, may not sufficiently penetrate certain body sites, and/or are associated with systemic toxicity. Little is known about how to position alternative administration approaches such as inhalational and direct drug delivery routes.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an updated overview of unconventional drug delivery strategies for managing IFD, focusing on inhalational (to target the lungs) and direct delivery methods to the central nervous system, bone/joint, and eyes. Novel compounds (e.g. opelconazole) and existing antifungals with innovative drug delivery systems currently undergoing clinical trials and/or used off-label in the clinical setting are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

For both inhalational agents and direct delivery approaches, there are similar challenges that include the absence of: approved formulations for specific administration routes, delivery vehicles that are simple and safe to use whilst maintaining potency and efficiency of delivery, animal models suitable for investigating pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of inhaled antifungals, and consensus on the composite endpoints and intervals for of follow-up in clinical trials. To meet these challenges, cooperation of all stakeholders in drug development and regulation is required.

An individualised 3D computational flow and particle model to predict the deposition of inhaled medicines - A case study using a nebuliser

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug inhalation is generally accepted as the preferred administration method for treating respiratory diseases. To achieve effective inhaled drug delivery for an individual, it is necessary to use an interdisciplinary approach that can cope with inter-individual differences. The paper aims to present an individualised pulmonary drug deposition model based on Computational Fluid and Particle Dynamics simulations within a time frame acceptable for clinical use.

METHODS

We propose a model that can analyse the inhaled drug delivery efficiency based on the patient's airway geometry as well as breathing pattern, which has the potential to also serve as a tool for a sub-regional diagnosis of respiratory diseases. The particle properties and size distribution are taken for the case of drug inhalation by using nebulisers, as they are independent of the patient's breathing pattern. Finally, the inhaled drug doses that reach the deep airways of different lobe regions of the patient are studied.

RESULTS

The numerical accuracy of the proposed model is verified by comparison with experimental results. The difference in total drug deposition fractions between the simulation and experimental results is smaller than 4.44% and 1.43% for flow rates of 60 l/min and 15 l/min, respectively. A case study involving a COVID-19 patient is conducted to illustrate the potential clinical use of the model. The study analyses the drug deposition fractions in relation to the breathing pattern, aerosol size distribution, and different lobe regions.

CONCLUSIONS

The entire process of the proposed model can be completed within 48 h, allowing an evaluation of the deposition of the inhaled drug in an individual patient's lung within a time frame acceptable for clinical use. Achieving a 48-hour time window for a single evaluation of patient-specific drug delivery enables the physician to monitor the patient's changing conditions and potentially adjust the drug administration accordingly. Furthermore, we show that the proposed methodology also offers a possibility to be extended to a detection approach for some respiratory diseases.

Inhaled Antifungal Agents for the Treatment and Prophylaxis of Pulmonary Mycoses

Pulmonary mycoses are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The current standard treatment by systemic administration is limited by inadequate local bioavailability and systemic toxic effects. Aerosolisation of antifungals is an attractive approach to overcome these problems, but no inhaled antifungal formulation is currently available for the treatment of pulmonary mycoses. Hence, the development of respirable antifungals formulations is of interest and in high demand. In this review, the recent advances in the development of antifungal formulations for pulmonary delivery are discussed, including both nebulised and dry powder formulations. Although the clinical practices of nebulised parenteral amphotericin B and voriconazole formulations (off-label use) are reported to show promising therapeutic effects with few adverse effects, there is no consensus about the dosage regimen (e.g. the dose, frequency, and whether they are used as single or combination therapy). To maximise the benefits of nebulised antifungal therapy, it is important to establish standardised protocol that clearly defines the dose and specifies the device and the administration conditions. Dry powder formulations of antifungal agents such as itraconazole and voriconazole with favourable physicochemical and aerosol properties are developed using various powder engineering technologies, but it is important to consider their suitability for use in patients with compromised lung functions. In addition, more biological studies on the therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile are needed to demonstrate their clinical potential.

Nebulized Micafungin Treatment for Scopulariopsis/Microascus Tracheobronchitis in Lung Transplant Recipients

Scopulariopsis/Microascus isolates cause infections with high mortality in lung transplant recipients. Treatment is challenging due to antimicrobial resistance. We describe two cases of Scopulariopsis/Microascus tracheobronchitis in lung transplant recipients successfully treated with nebulized micafungin. This antifungal was well tolerated and achieved high concentrations in epithelial lining fluid up to 14 h after nebulization without significant plasma concentrations. Nebulized micafungin may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of fungal tracheobronchitis.