Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part IV: Between- and within-participant variables affecting lip vermilion sensory thresholds

Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of repaired lip sensation in patients with cleft lip

Background

Cleft lip is the most common congenital anomaly worldwide. Nevertheless, lip somatosensory characteristics of patients with cleft lip after cheiloplasty have not yet been determined. The present study used magnetoencephalography to objectively evaluate the lip sensation in patients with unilateral cleft lip to establish a new objective evaluation method.

Methods

Participants were 15 patients with unilateral cleft lip after cheiloplasty (UCL group), and 30 healthy young subjects (control group). Five points of the upper and lower lips were stimulated electrically to measure somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs). The sources of the magnetic fields were modeled as single equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). ECDs located on the central sulcus by superimposition on magnetic resonance images were analyzed. Latency and intensity at 50–75 ms (cP60m) observed in the UCL group were compared with those in the control group. Thresholds of tactile stimuli in both groups were obtained using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments for subjective sensory evaluation.

Results

No significant difference was found in the intensity of the cP60m or subjective evaluation between the groups. However, the latency of the cP60m was significantly longer in the upper lip of the UCL group than in the control group.

Conclusions

SEFs showed a difference in lip sensation between the UCL group and the control group, suggesting that longer latency might be caused by the effects of surgical scarring on the neurotransmission pathway. These results suggest SEFs as useful for the objective evaluation of lip sensations. This study might improve future surgical procedures and lip functions of patients with cleft lip.

Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify child-, surgeon-, and hospital-specific factors at the time of primary cleft lip repair that are associated with the use of secondary cleft lip surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Forty-nine pediatric hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Children who underwent cleft lip repair between 1999 and 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Time from primary cleft lip repair to secondary lip surgery.

RESULTS

By 5 years after primary lip repair, 24.0% of children had undergone a secondary lip surgery. In multivariable analysis, primary lip repair before 3 months had a 1.22-fold increased hazard of secondary surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.46) compared to repair at 7 to 12 months of age, and children with multiple congenital anomalies had a 0.77-fold decreased hazard of secondary surgery (95% CI: 0.68-0.87). After adjusting for cleft type, age at repair, presence of multiple congenital anomalies, and procedure volume, there remained substantial variation in secondary surgery use among surgeons and hospitals (P < .01). For children with unilateral cleft lip repaired at 3 to 6 months of age, the predicted proportion of children undergoing secondary surgery within 5 years of primary repair ranged from 4.9% to 21.8% across surgeons and from 4.5% to 24.7% across hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There are substantial differences among surgeons and hospitals in the rates of secondary lip surgery. Further work is needed to identify causes for this variation among providers.

Effects of lip revision surgery on long-term orosensory function in patients with cleft lip/palate

OBJECTIVE : To determine whether secondary lip revision surgery impacts sensitivity of the upper lip. DESIGN : A three-group, parallel, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. SETTING : University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS : Three groups: (1) patients with repaired cleft lip/palate who were scheduled for lip revision (revision; N = 20); (2) patients with repaired cleft lip/palate who did not receive a lip revision (non-revision; N = 13); and (3) non-cleft control subjects (non-cleft; N = 22). Interventions : Lip revision surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Measures of (1) two-point perception threshold (two-point), (2) warmth detection threshold (warm), and (3) cool detection threshold (cool) were obtained from two sites on the upper lip vermilion. The revision participants were tested approximately 1 week before surgery and then approximately 3 and 12 months after surgery. The non-revision and non-cleft participants were tested at similar times. RESULTS : There were no significant differences among the three groups at baseline for two-point, warm, or cool. The main effects of group, age, sex, and time were not statistically significant for the two-point or warm (p > .05). The mean differences between the 3- and 12-month follow-up visits and baseline for two-point and warm were small for all three groups. For cool, group was statistically significant (p = .04), the difference in the non-revision group between follow-up and baseline was 31% to 34% higher than in the non-cleft group (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS : Although at postsurgery revision participants exhibited threshold values comparable to presurgical values, the sensory differences observed among subgroups of participants with cleft lip are complex.

[Sensibility changes of the infraorbital nerve after primary surgery on patients with unilateral cleft lip according to J. Delaire]

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine the overall sensibility changes in the area of the infraorbital nerve on patients with unilateral clefts lips and unilateral clefts lips and palate who had undergone primary surgical correction according to the principles of Delaire.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Twenty patients (7-20years) with unilateral cleft lips (and palate) who had undergone surgery in infancy according to Delaire were included. Cutaneous sensibilities of the nasolabial fold and of the upper lip were tested using four cutaneous modalities. A tactil superficial sensibility light touch test, a two-point discrimination test (McKinnon-Dellon Disk-Criminator), and the determination of cold and warm detection thresholds (Quantitative Sensory Testing, Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyser). The possible difference of the sensibility between operated and controlateral sides of the face were compared. Results were finally compared to a control group of twenty healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

No significant difference could be found between the operated and non-operated side of the cleft group. There was also no difference between the cleft and the control group. Specific difference of perception between nasolabial fold and lip encountered in the literature were confirmed by the experiments.

CONCLUSION

The large subperiostal approach according to Delaire during the primary surgical procedure have not affected long term infraorbital sensibility of patients with unilateral complete cleft lip.

Facial altered sensation and sensory impairment after orthognathic surgery

The aim of this study was to determine whether impairment of sensory functions after trigeminal nerve injury differs in severity among patients who report qualitatively different altered sensations. Data were obtained from 184 patients. Before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after orthognathic surgery, patients were grouped as having no altered sensation, negative sensations only (hypoaesthetic), mixed sensations (negative+active), or active sensations only (paraesthetic or dysaesthetic). Bias-free estimates of contact detection and two-point discrimination were obtained to assess, via ANOVA, whether patients in the four groups exhibited different levels of sensory impairment. Impairment in contact detection and two-point discrimination was found to differ significantly among the groups at 6 months but not at 1 month. At 6 months, patients who reported negative sensations only exhibited the greatest impairment, on average, in contact detection; in contrast, patients who reported mixed sensations exhibited the greatest impairment in two-point discrimination. The least residual impairment at 6 months was observed in patients who reported no altered sensation. It is recommended that clinical judgments regarding nerve injury-associated sensory dysfunction should not be based on threshold testing results without consideration of patients' subjective reports of altered sensation.