Use of a Flexible Intramedullary Rod and its Influence on Patient Satisfaction and Femoral Size in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Background

The application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive off-label robotic-assisted revision TKA were performed. After virtual revision femoral and tibial components were positioned to achieve "balanced" medial and lateral flexion and extension gaps, the existing primary implants (PI) were removed, and bone cuts were executed with the robotic arm system. Preoperative coronal, sagittal, and axial position of the PI was compared to the final planned positions of the robotic revision implants (RRI) for each subject. A repeated measures ANOVA using the absolute difference in millimeters and degrees between the PI and RRI orientation was completed.

Results

Intra-operatively, the virtual gaps were balanced within the planning software followed by successful execution of the plan. There was a statistically significant difference between posterior condylar offset and tibial component positioning for RRI compared to PI. There was no difference between the distal femoral component values between PI and RRI.

Conclusions

The sagittal alignment of the revision implants, specifically the femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial component slope, are statistically significant considerations for a stable revision TKA with off-label use of a robotic-arm system. Other potential benefits may include appropriate implant sizing which can affect the resultant ligamentous tension important for a functional revision TKA. Future research and software iterations will be needed to determine the overall accuracy and utility of robotic-assisted revision TKA.

Sagittal mechanical ratio: A novel technique to define sagittal alignment of the femur independent of distal anatomic landmarks

BACKGROUND

Radiographic measurements to study sagittal alignment in the setting of knee are frequently difficult to evaluate due the presence of a prosthesis or implant that obscures traditional radiographic landmarks. In this paper we present a novel method of determining sagittal femoral alignment in the presence of obscuring implants.

METHODS

98 full-length femoral radiographs were reviewed and divided into two groups. In Group 1, the Distal Mechanical Point (DMP) was used to calculate the Distal Mechanical Ratio (DMR), defined as the ratio of the linear distance from the DMP to the anterior cortical axis divided by the distance from the anterior cortical axis to posterior condylar cortex. In group 2, the sagittal mechanical axis was measured using the true DMP (tDMP) and then separately measured using the DMR to find the calculated DMP (cDMP), and the angular variance between the calculated (cSMA) and true (tSMA) sagittal mechanical axis was calculated, as well as the linear distance between the tDMP and cDMP. Twenty additional patients with knee replacements were then selected and two observers used a cSMA to determine a femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), with intraobserver correlation calculated.

RESULTS

The mean DMR was found to be 0.24, with high intraobserver correlation and normal distribution. Validation of the model demonstrated angular variance between tSMA and cSMA less than 1 degree and linear distance between tDMP and cDMP less than 1 mm. Calculation of cCMA in the presence of total knee arthroplasty revealed very strong intraobserver correlation of 0.89.

CONCLUSION

The Distal Mechanical Ratio reliably predicted the true Sagittal Mechanical Axis within 1 degree and true Distal Mechanical Point within 1 mm, indicating that it may be a valuable tool for evaluating sagittal femoral alignment in cases where anatomic landmarks may be absent or obscured.

A Flexible Intramedullary Guide Can Reduce the Anteroposterior Oversizing of Femoral Components Used in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Severe Distal Femoral Sagittal Bowing

Traditionally, a rigid intramedullary rod has been used as the reference guide for femoral cutting in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, correct positioning of this rigid rod is difficult, especially in the knees with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing. A flexible intramedullary rod has been developed to address this problem. This study was performed to compare the sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes of TKAs performed with flexible and rigid femoral intramedullary guides. Thirty-eight knees that underwent primary TKAs with flexible intramedullary rods as femoral cutting guides were matched according to patient height and sex with 38 knees that underwent TKAs using conventional rigid rods. Clinical outcomes, including the range of motion and functional scores, and radiological variables, including the distal femoral bowing angle (DFBA), femoral component flexion angle (FFA), and mediolateral overhang and anteroposterior (AP) oversizing of femoral components, were evaluated. Clinical and radiological outcomes did not differ significantly between the flexible rod and conventional rigid rod groups. A subgroup analysis of knees with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing (DFBA >4 degrees) showed that the FFA was significantly larger in the flexible rod group than in the rigid rod group, with an average difference of 3 degrees (5.2 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.6 degrees, respectively, p = 0.022). In addition, the incidence of AP oversizing of femoral components was lower in the flexible rod group than in the rigid rod group (11.1 vs. 60.0%, respectively, p = 0.027). Relative to TKA with a rigid rod, TKA performed with a flexible femoral intramedullary guide resulted in more flexed sagittal alignment of femoral components in patients with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing. This greater flexion of the femoral component resulted in less AP oversizing. However, the use of a flexible rod had no impact on short-term clinical outcomes.

Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Contributing Factors

The reported dissatisfaction rate after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ranges between 15% and 25%. The purpose of this article is to perform a narrative review of the literature with the aim of answering the following question: What are the main factors contributing to patient dissatisfaction after TKA? A review of the literature was performed on patient satisfaction after TKA. The search engines used were MedLine (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The keywords used were "TKA" and "satisfaction". The main reported preoperative factors positively contributing to patient satisfaction were the following: fulfilment of preoperative expectations, preoperative complete joint space collapse, increasing patellar and lateral compartment osteophyte size, and TKA communication checklist. The principal preoperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included female sex, comorbidities, and Hispanic race. The chief perioperative factor positively contributing to patient satisfaction was cosmetic closure, whereas the fundamental perioperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included joint laxity, anterior tibial component slope, and greater femoral component valgus angle. The principal postoperative factors positively contributing to patient satisfaction were the following: ameliorated walking distance, improved range of motion, and improvements in pain. The most important postoperative factors negatively contributing to patient satisfaction included poor postoperative knee stability and soft-tissue balance, functional limitation, surgical complication and reoperation, staff or quality of care issues, and increased stiffness.

Flexible versus standard intramedullary rod in posterior stabilized primary total knee arthroplasty: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA) a flexible intramedullary rod can be used to account for sagittal bowing of the distal femur. Although patients report better post-operative functional outcome when the flexible rod was used, it is unknown how the use of the flexible rod affects the placement of the femoral TKA component, and how this relates to activities of daily living. It is expected that the use of the flexible rod will result in a more flexed femoral component, a larger patellar tendon moment arm, and consequently in better functional outcome. The goal of this study is to compare the flexible rod to the standard intramedullary rod in primary TKA in terms of fit of the TKA, functional outcome, and sizing of the femoral component.

Methods

A single-blind randomized controlled trial with two groups (flexible vs standard rod), with patients blinded for group allocation, and 2 years post-operative follow-up. The fit of the TKA is quantified by two parameters: (1) the flexion angle of the TKA in the sagittal plane and (2) the sagittal profile of the distal femur compared between the pre-operative bone and the TKA. Both parameters are calculated in 3D volume images obtained using fluoroscopy. Functional outcome will be measured using (1) the timed Get-up and Go test (2), the stair climbing test (3), knee power output, and (4) patient and clinician reported outcomes. Different parameters will be measured during the TKA procedure to account for the invisibility of cartilage in the 3D volumes and to study if the amount of bone removed during the procedure is affected by group allocation.

Discussion

The sagittal fit of TKA is not a standardized outcome measure. We discuss our choice of parameters to define the sagittal fit (i.e., flexion angle and sagittal profile), our choice for the parameters we measure during the TKA procedure to account for the lack of cartilage thickness in fluoroscopy, and our choice for the parameters to study if the amount of bone removed during the procedure is affected by group allocation. Lastly, we discuss the merits of this planned trial.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register, 4888, registered 30 March 2015. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4888

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Medial Pivot or Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing Prosthesis in Chinese Patients

There is an unmet need for a prosthesis designed according to the anatomical parameters of the Chinese population. This study aims to compare the use of a medial pivot (MP) implant or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) substitution (posterior-stabilized [PS]) prosthesis for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a Chinese population. The medical records of patients undergoing unilateral TKA with an MP implant (Group A) or a PS prosthesis (Group B) at our institution between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed up for 5 years. Preoperatively and at the December 2016 postoperative follow-up, the Hospital for Special Surgery scoring system (HSS knee score) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were measured to evaluate TKA outcomes. This study included 49 patients in Group A and 51 in Group B. As of December 2016, there were no significant differences in the preoperative/postoperative changes in any category of the HSS knee score or WOMAC score between the groups. There were no postoperative complications in either group during the 5-year follow-up. There were no periprosthetic infections or need for revision surgery. One patient in Group A experienced aching and a small amount of effusion in the articular cavity that was attributed to overexertion. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in midterm outcomes in Chinese patients receiving an MP implant or a PS prosthesis for unilateral TKA. These data suggest that the MP and PCL substitution design are safe and effective for unilateral TKA in China.

Variation in Optimal Sagittal Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Accurate sagittal alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for prosthesis longevity, improved function, and patient satisfaction. However, there is variation in the techniques used to attain optimal sagittal femoral component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Femoral component flexion in imageless navigation is based on the mechanical axis rather than the distal femoral anatomy, and there is significant variability in the anatomy of the distal femur. The purpose of this study was to accurately determine the mean distal femoral flexion angle of a representative population and whether variability of the distal femoral flexion angle correlates with race, femur length, or radius of curvature. The mean degree of distal femoral flexion was determined by assessing distal femoral anatomy on computed tomography scans of paired femurs of 1235 patients without evidence of previous fracture, deformity, or surgical implants. The mean±SD distal femoral flexion angle was 2.90°±1.52°, with 80.2% of knees within 3°±2°. Therefore, placing the component in 3° of flexion from the mechanical axis would attain a satisfactory position in most cases. However, further analysis of the patient data revealed 11.4% of Asians, 7.3% of African Americans, and 8.3% of whites had a distal femoral flexion angle greater than 5°. Additionally, the data revealed a moderately strong negative correlation between the distal femoral flexion and the overall radius of curvature of the femur. This preliminary study highlights the need for improved methods for selecting femoral component position in the sagittal plane when using navigation for total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):102-106.].