Stage IV Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Risk Score to Predict Clinical Outcome

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs): Genetic and environmental biomarkers for risk of occurrence and prognosis

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells, representing approximately 10 % of all Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. While most pNENs are sporadic, a subset is associated with genetic syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) or von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL). pNENs are further classified into functioning and non-functioning tumors, with distinct clinical behaviors, prognoses, and treatment approaches. This review explores genetic and environmental biomarkers that influence the risk, prognosis, and therapeutic responses in pNENs. The epidemiology of pNENs reveals an increasing incidence, primarily due to advancements in imaging techniques. Genetic factors play a pivotal role, with germline mutations in MEN1, VHL, and other genes contributing to familial pNENs. Somatic mutations, including alterations in the mTOR pathway and DNA maintenance genes such as DAXX and ATRX, are critical in sporadic pNENs. These mutations, along with epigenetic dysregulation and transcriptomic alterations, underpin the diverse clinical and molecular phenotypes of pNENs. Emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation profiles, can stratify pNEN subtypes and predict disease progression. Environmental and lifestyle factors, such as diabetes, smoking, and chronic pancreatitis, have been linked to an increased risk of sporadic pNENs. While the association between these factors and tumor progression is still under investigation, their potential role in influencing therapeutic outcomes warrants further study. Advances in systemic therapies, including somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have improved disease management. Biomarkers such as Ki-67, somatostatin receptor expression, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status are being evaluated for their predictive value. Novel approaches, including the use of circulating biomarkers (NETest, circulating tumor cells, and ctDNA) and polygenic risk scores, offer promising avenues for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the need for large, well-annotated datasets and validated biomarkers. Future research should integrate multi-omics approaches and leverage liquid biopsy technologies to refine diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. Interdisciplinary collaborations and global consortia are crucial for overcoming current limitations and translating research findings into clinical practice. These insights hold promise for improving prevention, early detection, and tailored treatments, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Usefulness of Semiautomated 3D Volumetric Assessment of Liver Tumor Burden for Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), the Ki-67 index is objectively assessed by pathologists; however, liver tumor burden (LTB) depends on the subjective judgment of physicians. This study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the semi-automated 3D volumetric assessment of LTB in patients with PanNET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (40 computed tomographies [CTs]) with metastatic PanNETs. LTB was measured using a semiautomated 3D volumetric software program (volumetric assessment) or evaluated independently by 6 clinicians using CT imaging (visual assessment). The treatment map was classified into 3 groups based on LTB and Ki-67 index.

RESULTS

Visual and volumetric assessments of the LTB were well correlated. The LTB was significantly higher on visual assessment than volumetric assessment (P < 0.01). Categorization on the map was consistent between the visual and volumetric evaluations in 23 patients (equal group). The remaining 6 patients were overestimated by visual assessment (overestimated group). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients in the 'equal group' than the 'overestimated group' (981 vs 366 days, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study revealed a good correlation between visual and volumetric assessments, and visual assessment overestimated LTB, compared to volumetric assessment.

NETest and Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Still Far from Routine Clinical Application? A Systematic Review

Background: Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most prevalent subgroup among NETs and include heterogeneous tumors characterized by different clinical behavior and prognosis. The NETest is a tool based on real-time PCR combined with deep learning strategies to specifically identify tumors with a neuroendocrine genotype. Despite the promising results achieved regarding its utility in the field of GEP-NETs, the NETest has not yet entered into routine clinical practice. Methods: We performed a systematic review aimed at summarizing available evidence on the application of the NETest in both the diagnosis and the prognostic stratification of GEP-NETs. Results: We identified five studies evaluating the diagnostic role of the NETest and nine studies evaluating its prognostic value. The NETest emerged as a reliable biomarker for GEP-NET diagnosis with an accuracy higher than 90%, regardless of tumor stage and grade. However, according to some studies, the NETest showed a low specificity, mainly attributed to interferences with other gastro-intestinal malignancies. In terms of prognostic value, the NETest correlated with the detection of residual disease after surgery in six studies. The NETest was also associated with patients' survival outcomes, namely progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in three studies. Conclusions: According to current systematic review, the value of the NETest both for diagnosis and for prognosis of GEP-NET emerged as robust across different studies. Further prospective analysis on larger GEP-NET series is encouraged to validate this tool, improving patients' diagnosis, management, and follow-up.

Liver metastases in high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comparative study of hepatic tumor volume and biochemical findings in NET G3 versus NEC

Abnormal liver blood tests and liver tumor burden are known prognostic factors in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, the relationship between biochemical liver parameters and hepatic tumor load is largely unknown in NEN and in high-grade NEN (G3) specifically. The primary objective of this study was to correlate the biochemical parameters and liver tumor volume of patients with neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NET G3) or neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). We wanted to investigate whether patients with NET G3 with extensive liver involvement had less severely elevated laboratory liver parameters than NEC patients. In total, 46 patients with NEN were included, 31 had NEC and 15 NET G3. All patients had distant metastatic disease, with liver metastases being the most common (n = 39). Both laboratory results and semiautomatic volumetric measurements of liver tumor burden were obtainable for 34 patients at baseline and 26 patients at follow-up. Alkaline phosphatase (AP), gamma-GT (gGT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increased significantly between the two time periods (p < .01). In a regression model, liver tumor burden significantly affected several blood parameters, for example, increasing AP, gGT, LDH, and aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) by a factor of 1.02-1.04 per unit increase (1% tumor burden; all p < .001). AP, gGT, and LDH were significantly lower in NET G3 (factor of 0.43-0.68) than in NEC. Here, we found that liver chemistries changed over the NEN disease course, correlated with hepatic tumor burden, and differed by histologic subtype. The current data can potentially guide treatment decisions, for example, with regard to integration of liver-directed therapies.

Comparative analysis of international guidelines on the management of advanced non-functioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

This review presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of international guidelines for managing advanced, non-functioning, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). PanNETs, which represent a significant proportion of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, exhibit diverse clinical behaviors and prognoses based on differentiation, grading, and other molecular markers. The varying therapeutic strategies proposed by different guidelines reflect their distinct emphases and regional considerations, such as the ESMO guideline's focus on advanced disease management and the ENETS guidance paper's multidisciplinary approach. This review examines the most recent guidelines from ESMO, NCCN, ASCO, ENETS, and NANETS, analyzing the recommendations for first-line therapies and subsequent treatment pathways in different clinical scenarios. Significant variations are observed in the recommendations, particularly concerning the choice and sequence of systemic therapies, the role of tumor grading and the Ki-67 index in therapeutic decisions, and the integration of regional regulatory and clinical practices. The analysis highlights the need for a tailored approach to managing advanced NF panNETs, advocating for flexibility in applying guidelines to account for individual patient circumstances and the evolving evidence base. This work underscores the complexities of managing this patient population and the critical role of a multidisciplinary team in optimizing treatment outcomes.

Gastrointestinal side effects of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine tumors: a focused review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of well-differentiated heterogeneous neoplasms characterized by slow progression and distinct clinical and biological behavior. In the majority of patients with NET, first-line treatment is represented by somatostatin analogs (SSAs) that, despite being drugs with high tolerability (even at high doses) and providing to carcinoid symptoms control and anti-proliferative effects, may present some side effects, with potential impact on quality of life and nutritional status. The most frequent side effects are represented by gastrointestinal events in particular alterations in bowel habits (diarrhea and constipation), abdominal pain, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and cholelithiasis. Considering the relative rarity of NETs, literature about frequency and standard clinical management of adverse events SSA-related is still lacking and heterogeneous. The aim of this review is to arm gastroenterologists and other physicians treating NET patients with essential knowledge on the side effects of SSAs. By identifying and managing these adverse events early, healthcare professionals can offer optimal care, avert foreseeable complications, and ensure the best outcomes for patients. Without such early recognition, there is a risk of diminishing the patient's quality of life and their ability to sustain treatment over time.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current development, challenges, and clinical perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly heterogeneous and potentially malignant tumors arising from secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are the most common subtype of NENs. Historically, GEP-NENs have been regarded as infrequent and slow-growing malignancies; however, recent data have demonstrated that the worldwide prevalence and incidence of GEP-NENs have increased exponentially over the last three decades. In addition, an increasing number of studies have proven that GEP-NENs result in a limited life expectancy. These findings suggested that the natural biology of GEP-NENs is more aggressive than commonly assumed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for advanced researches focusing on the diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. In this review, we have summarized the limitations and recent advancements in our comprehension of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathology, molecular biology, diagnosis, and treatment of GEP-NETs to identify factors contributing to delays in diagnosis and timely treatment of these patients.

When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare and challenging to manage. While most patients with small rNET can be definitively treated with local excision, the role of chemotherapy in general and neoadjuvant therapy particularly in managing advanced rNET has not been well established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which patients with rNET may gain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection of rNET in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2019) was performed. First, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS) and define the high-risk groups. Afterward, stratified OS analyses were performed for each high-risk group to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a survival benefit in each group.

RESULTS

A total of 1837 patients (49.8% female; mean age 56.6 ± 12.3 years) underwent radical resection of a rNET. Tumors > 20 mm in size, clinical T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease were independent predictors of worse OS and were defined as high-risk groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant survival benefit in any of the high-risk groups, except for patients with high-grade rNETs where neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved OS to a mean of 30.9 months compared with 15.9 months when neoadjuvant therapy was not given (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with high-grade rNET by 15 months and may be indicated for this group.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Gastric, Duodenal, or Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors after Incomplete Endoscopic Resection

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with well-differentiated gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine tumors after treatment with incomplete endoscopic resection due to the finding of microscopic positive resection margins (R1). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with type 1 gastric, non-ampullary non-functioning duodenal, or rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms with positive R1 margins after endoscopic resection. The rate of tumor recurrence and progression-free survival were considered to be the study's main endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc® v.17 software and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. A Cox proportional-hazard regression was performed to identify risk factors for disease recurrence/progression. Results: After evaluating 110 patients, a total of 58 patients were included in the final analysis (15 gastric NENs, 12 duodenal NENs, and 31 rectal NENs). After evidence of endoscopic R1 resection had been gathered, 26 patients (44.8%) underwent an endoscopic/surgical extension of the previous resection. Tumor progression (all local recurrences) occurred in five out of fifty-eight patients (8.6%) with a median PFS of 36 months. There were no tumor-related deaths. G2 grading and the gastric primary tumor site were the only features significantly associated with the risk of recurrence of the disease (HR: 11.97 [95% CI: 1.22-116.99], HR: 12.54 [95% CI: 1.28-122.24], respectively). Conclusions: Tumor progression rarely occurs in patients with microscopic positive margin excision (R1) after endoscopic resection and does not seem to affect patients' clinical outcomes.

Endoscopic management of gastric, duodenal and rectal NETs: Position paper from the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED)

The present paper reflects the position of the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet), the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), and the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) regarding the management of patients affected by gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) amenable to endoscopic treatment. The key questions discussed in this paper are summarized in Table 1. Data were extracted from the MEDLINE database through searches; expert opinions and recommendations are provided in accordance with the available scientific evidence and the authors' expertise. Recommendations are presented alongside a level of evidence and grade of recommendation based on the GRADE system. This paper specifically focuses on subgroups of NENs considered suitable for endoscopic management according to current international guidelines: i. well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNET) type 1 < 2 cm and selected cases of type 3; ii. well-differentiated duodenal, non-functioning, non-ampullary NET with size < 2 cm; and well-differentiated rectal NET with size < 2 cm.

Epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a review and protocol presentation for bridging tumor registry data with the Italian association for neuroendocrine tumors (Itanet) national database

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Large databases like the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and national NEN registries have provided significant epidemiological knowledge, but they have limitations given the recent advancements in NEN diagnostics and treatments. For instance, newer imaging techniques and therapies have revolutionized NEN management, rendering older data less representative. Additionally, crucial parameters, like the Ki67 index, are missing from many databases. Acknowledging these gaps, the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet) initiated a national multicenter prospective database in 2019, aiming to gather data on newly-diagnosed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (GEP) NENs. This observational study, coordinated by Itanet, includes patients from 37 Italian centers. The database, which is rigorously maintained and updated, focuses on diverse parameters including age, diagnostic techniques, tumor stage, treatments, and survival metrics. As of October 2023, data from 1,600 patients have been recorded, with an anticipation of reaching 3600 by the end of 2025. This study aims at understanding the epidemiology, clinical attributes, and treatment strategies for GEP-NENs in Italy, and to introduce the Itanet database project. Once comprehensive follow-up data will be acquired, the goal will be to discern predictors of treatment outcomes and disease prognosis. The Itanet database will offer an unparalleled, updated perspective on GEP-NENs, addressing the limitations of older databases and aiding in optimizing patient care. STUDY REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered in clinicaltriasl.gov (NCT04282083).

Type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: the rising promise of conservative endoscopic management

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) are rare tumors arising from the gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Recent data suggests an increased detection rate, attributed to more frequent esophagogastroduodenoscopies. While type 3 g-NENs were historically deemed aggressive, emerging research indicates potential for conservative management, especially endoscopic resection, in well-differentiated, small tumors. European guidelines now advocate for endoscopic intervention in selected cases, but North American guidelines remain more conservative. Key factors influencing outcomes are tumor size, grading, and depth of gastric wall infiltration. Endoscopic resection has shown promise for tumors confined to submucosal layers without lymphovascular invasion. Given the complexities, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for management decisions. Current insights are largely based on retrospective studies, underscoring the need for prospective research to optimize endoscopic approaches.

Utility of histopathological revision in the management of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Histological evaluation and grading assessment are key points in the diagnostic work-up of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs).

AIM

To analyze the impact of histopathological revision on the clinical management of patients with GEP-NEN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred to our Center of Excellence between 2015 and 2021 were included in this study. Immunohistochemical slides at the time of initial diagnosis were reviewed to assess tumor morphology, diagnostic immunohistochemistry, and Ki67.

RESULTS

101 patients were evaluated, with 65 (64.4%) gastrointestinal, 25 (24.7%) pancreatic, and 11 (10.9%) occult neoplastic lesions suspected to be of GEP origin. The main changes resulting from the revision were: first Ki-67 assessment in 15.8% of patients, Ki-67 change in 59.2% of patients and grading modification in 23.5% of patients. An additional immunohistochemical evaluation was performed in 78 (77.2%) patients, leading to a confirmation of GEP origin in 10 of 11 (90.9%) of unknown primary site neoplastic lesions and an exclusion of NEN diagnosis in 2 (2%) patients. After histopathological revision, a significant modification in clinical management was proposed in 42 (41.6%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological revision in a referral NEN center is strongly advised in newly diagnosed GEP-NENs to properly plan prognostic stratification and therapeutic choice.

When Should We Adopt EUS-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors?

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases that account for less than 2% of all cases of pancreatic cancer and only 30% of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasia, even if their incidence and prevalence continue to rise globally [...].

Management of Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

Functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases in terms of both clinical and pathological aspects. These tumors secrete hormones or peptides, which may cause a wide variety of symptoms related to a clinical syndrome. The management of functional pNENs is still challenging for clinicians due to the need to control both tumor growth and specific symptoms. Surgery remains the cornerstone in the management of local disease because it can definitively cure the patient. However, when the disease is not resectable, a broad spectrum of therapeutic options, including locoregional therapy, somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapies, peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and chemotherapy, are available. The present review summarizes the main key issues regarding the clinical management of these tumors, providing a specific highlight on their therapeutic approach.

The meaning of R1 resection after endoscopic removal of gastric, duodenal and rectal neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Well-differentiated gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NETs) are rare diseases usually managed by endoscopic treatment. Although several endoscopic techniques are available, the number of patients with incomplete (R1) resection is significant.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the meaning of incomplete R1 findings after endoscopic resection in type I gastric NETs; nonfunctioning, non-ampullary duodenal NETs; and small rectal NETs. Data were identified by MEDLINE database search without publication date limitation.

EXPERT OPINION

An incomplete R1 finding may have no significant impact on a patient's clinical outcome, particularly in small G1 type I gastric NETs, which have an indolent course. A 'stepwise approach,' which uses more advanced endoscopic techniques, or minimally invasive surgery may be justified to achieve complete margin-free resection. This approach must balance the tumor features and the procedure-related risk of complications, particularly in the duodenum, where the role of deep endoscopic resections is limited due to the thin duodenal wall. Gastric and rectal NETs that are incompletely removed after initial resection are more easily amenable to deep endoscopic techniques. However, this might not be necessary for patients with comorbidities, elderly, or both due to the uncertainty of how R1 finding impacts a patient's clinical outcome.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): Innovations and Improvements

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells distributed throughout the human body. With an increasing incidence over the past few decades, they represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms, mostly expressing somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their cell surface. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a crucial strategy for treating advanced, unresectable neuroendocrine tumors by administering radiolabeled somatostatin analogs intravenously to target SSTRs. This article will focus on the multidisciplinary theranostic approach, treatment effectiveness (such as response rates and symptom relief), patient outcomes, and toxicity profile of PRRT for NEN patients. We will review the most significant studies, such as the phase III NETTER-1 trial, and discuss promising new radiopharmaceuticals, including alpha-emitting radionuclide-labeled somatostatin analogs and SSTR antagonists.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): Innovations and Improvements

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells distributed throughout the human body. With an increasing incidence over the past few decades, they represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms, mostly expressing somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their cell surface. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a crucial strategy for treating advanced, unresectable neuroendocrine tumors by administering radiolabeled somatostatin analogs intravenously to target SSTRs. This article will focus on the multidisciplinary theranostic approach, treatment effectiveness (such as response rates and symptom relief), patient outcomes, and toxicity profile of PRRT for NEN patients. We will review the most significant studies, such as the phase III NETTER-1 trial, and discuss promising new radiopharmaceuticals, including alpha-emitting radionuclide-labeled somatostatin analogs and SSTR antagonists.

Chronic Treatment with Somatostatin Analogues in Recurrent Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GC-1) represent an uncommon subtype of neoplasms. Endoscopic resection has been proposed as the treatment of choice; active surveillance may be performed in those smaller than 1 cm, while gastric surgery may be performed for those with frequent recurrences. The antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogues (SSA) is well known, and their action on GC-1s has been postulated as a chronic treatment to reduce recurrence. Methods: A two-centered, retrospective, observational study that included nine patients (55.6% women) diagnosed with GC-1, receiving long-term treatment with SSA, with a median follow-up from baseline of 22 months, was undertaken. Endoscopic follow-up, extension study, and analytical values of chromogranin A (Cg A) and gastrin were collected. Results: In total, 88.9% of patients presented partial or complete response. Treatment with SSA was the only independent factor with a trend to prevent tumor recurrence (Odds Ratio 0.054; p = 0.005). A nonsignificant tendency toward a decrease in CgA and gastrin was observed; lack of significance was probably related to concomitant treatment with proton pump inhibitors in some patients. Conclusions: Chronic treatment with SSA is a feasible option for recurrent GC-1s that are difficult to manage using endoscopy or gastrectomy. Randomized clinical trials to provide more scientific evidence are still needed.

Nuclear Medicine and Radiological Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multidisciplinary Update

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are part of a large family of tumors arising from the neuroendocrine system. PanNENs show low-intermediate tumor grade and generally high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. Therefore, panNENs benefit from functional imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogues (SSA) for diagnosis, staging, and treatment choice in parallel with morphological imaging. This narrative review aims to present conventional imaging techniques and new perspectives in the management of panNENs, providing the clinicians with useful insight for clinical practice. The ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT is the most widely used in panNENs, not only fr diagnosis and staging purpose but also to characterize the biology of the tumor and its responsiveness to SSAs. On the contrary, the ¹⁸F-Fluordeoxiglucose (FDG) PET/CT is not employed systematically in all panNEN patients, being generally preferred in G2-G3, to predict aggressiveness and progression rate. The combination of ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can finally suggest the best therapeutic strategy. Other radiopharmaceuticals are ⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4 in case of insulinomas and ¹⁸F-dopamine (DOPA), which can be helpful in SSTR-negative tumors. New promising but still-under-investigation radiopharmaceuticals include radiolabeled SSTR antagonists and ¹⁸F-SSAs. Conventional imaging includes contrast enhanced CT and multiparametric MRI. There are now enriched by radiomics, a new non-invasive imaging approach, very promising to early predict tumor response or progression.

The Antiproliferative Activity of High-Dose Somatostatin Analogs in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The antiproliferative activity of a high dose of somatostatin analogs (HD-SSA) in treating gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) remains under debate. Methods: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis were made. The primary endpoint was the efficacy measured as incidence density ratio (IDR) at one year. The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and severe adverse events (SAEs). The heterogeneity (I2), when high (>50%), was interpreted by performing a univariate metaregression analysis, analyzing as covariates: type and design of the study, location (Europe or USA), sample size, grading according to 2017 WHO, the metastatic disease rate, previous therapy including surgery, and quality of the study. Results: A total of 11 studies with 783 patients were included. The IDR was 62 new progressions of 100 patients treated with HD-SSA every one year. The heterogeneity was high. The study’s year, type and design, primary tumor, grading, previous treatments, and quality of the studies did not influence the IDR. The IDR was significantly higher in USA centers and studies with more than 50 patients. The IDR was lower when a high rate of metastatic patients was present in the studies. The DCR was 45%. The heterogeneity was high. The DCR was lower in USA studies and in prospective trials. Conclusion: Given the limited efficacy of HD-SSA in preventing the disease progression in unresectable GEP-NENs after failure of standard dose SSA, the use of this therapeutic approach is advisable in selected cases when other antiproliferative treatments are not feasible.

NETest: serial liquid biopsies in gastroenteropancreatic NET surveillance

Objective

Up to now, serial NETest measurements in individuals assessing the disease course of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) at long-term follow-up and treatment response were not studied.

Design

The study was a longitudinal validation study of serial NETest measurements - a blood-based gene expression signature - in 132 patients with GEPNETs on therapy or watch-and-wait strategy.

Methods

Serial samples were collected during 46 (range: 6-71) months of follow-up. NETest scores were compared with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1-defined treatment response (e.g. no evidence of disease (NED), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD)).

Results

Consecutive NETest scores fluctuated substantially (range: 0-100) over time in individuals with SD (n = 28) and NED (n = 30). Follow-up samples were significantly higher in SD (samples 3-5) and NED subgroups (samples 2-5) compared with baseline results, without changes in imaging. In 82% of untreated patients with PD, consecutive NETest scores consistently remained high. In patients undergoing systemic treatment, the median pre-treatment NETest score in treatment-responders was 76.5 (n = 22) vs 33 (n = 12) in non-responders (P = 0.001). Patients with low pre-treatment scores had 21 months reduced progression-free survival (10 vs 31 months; P = 0.01). The accuracy of the NETest for treatment response prediction was 0.73 (P = 0.009).

Conclusion

In patients not undergoing treatment, consecutive low NETest scores are associated with indolent behavior. Patients who develop PD exhibit elevated scores. Elevated results have important predictive value for treatment responsiveness and could be used for individualizing decisions on systemic therapy. The clinical value of follow-up NETest scores for patients who choose to watch and wait requires further study.

Real-world comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumors in England: a matched cohort analysis using data from the hospital episode statistics dataset

OBJECTIVE

To explore the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for patients with progressive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and matched patients treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs), chemotherapy, or targeted therapies.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset 2016-2018 was used to compare HCRU and costs between the two cohorts. The [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE cohort included patients assigned with a diagnosis code relevant to GEP-NET, a procedure code for imaging or SSAs, and a subsequent code for radionuclide therapy. The non-[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE cohort included patients assigned with a diagnosis code relevant to GEP-NET who had an increased frequency of SSAs or switched from SSAs to chemotherapy or targeted therapies. Cohorts were matched on propensity scores with sex, age at disease progression, and Charlson Comorbidity Index as parameters. Healthcare Resource Group codes were used for costing.

RESULTS

A total of 199 matched patients were included. The [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE cohort had lower overall costs (£1,882,028 vs. £3,016,321; p < .0001), non-elective inpatient spells (289 vs. 611 days) and costs (£849,569 vs. £1,707,109; p < .0001 for both), Accident & Emergency costs (£41,978 vs. £62,480; p = .0013), and average length of stay for overall inpatient spells (14.2 vs. 23.3 days; p = .1092) compared with the non-[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses indicate significantly lower overall costs and HCRU for progressive GEP-NET patients treated with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Current research reveals that future real-world analyses would further benefit from using additional databases linked to the HES dataset such as the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and/or National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database.

Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

In the 2019 WHO guidelines, the classification of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) has changed from one being based on Ki-67 proliferation index alone to one that also includes tumor differentiation. Consequently, GEP NENs are now classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), NET G1 (Ki-67 <3%), NET G2 (Ki-67 3-20%) and NET G3 (Ki-67 >20%), and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (Ki-67 >20%). It has been suggested that NET G3 should be treated as NET G2 with respect to surgery, while surgical management of NEC should be expanded from local disease to also include patients with advanced disease where curative surgery is possible. High grade mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) have a neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component mostly with a poor prognosis. All studies evaluating the effect of surgery in NEC and MiNEN are observational and hold a risk of selection bias, which may overestimate the beneficial effect of surgery. Further, only a few studies on the effect of surgery in MiNEN exist. This review aims to summarize the data on the outcome of surgery in patients with GEP NET G3, GEP NEC and high grade MiNEN. The current evidence suggests that patients with NEN G3 and localized disease and NEN G3 patients with metastatic disease where curative surgery can be achieved may benefit from surgery. In patients with MiNEN, it is currently not possible to evaluate on the potential beneficial effect of surgery due to the low number of studies.

Usefulness of 68-Gallium PET in Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Case Series

Background: Type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia (gNEN) is a rare and low-grade tumor in which the therapeutic strategy is almost always endoscopic. For this reason, the use of radiology or nuclear medicine imaging is not recommended by guidelines. Conversely, in a small number of cases, locoregional or distant metastases may develop, thus suggesting a role for imaging techniques. This retrospective study was performed to explore the usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT in the management of patients with T1gNENs. Patients and Method: Single-center retrospective analysis, in an ENETS Center of Excellence, of patients with type I gNEN who underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The indication for performing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was generally based on the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (1) polyps > 10 mm; (2) endoscopic positive (R1) margin after previous endoscopic resection; and (3) Ki-67 > 3%. Results: A total of 120 patients with T1gNEN were evaluated. Overall, 15 out of 120 (13%) patients had performed [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT. The median Ki-67 value was 6% (IQR 1−9): 9 out of 15 (60%) were G1 tumors, and 6 out of 15 (40%) were G2 tumors. Ninety-three percent of patients were treated by tumor endoscopic resection, whereas surgery was performed in two patients (13%) after incomplete endoscopic resection; the remaining patients (6.6%) received somatostatin analogs due to the presence of multiple recurrent tumors. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT was positive in 8 out of 15 patients (53%). Following the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT findings, the clinical management was modified in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT can be useful in a restricted and selected group of patients with gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia with relevant risk factors to establish the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.

"The past is a different country, they do things differently there": using the SEER data-base to assess prognosis in neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are still considered to be rare neoplasms, and their epidemiology has been classically studied in large population-based cancer registries. Besides the benefits and the limitations that a cancer registry may have for all the registered cancers, the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Programme, has a number of drawbacks for the study of NENs. The change in management of NENs, either from diagnostic or from therapeutic points of view, the role of the Ki-67 labelling index and introduction of sensitive functional imaging, along with the misclassification of the more benign types of NENs, are the main limitations of the prognostic ability of the SEER data-base, particularly when including older data.

A tool to predict survival in stage IV entero-pancreatic NEN

PURPOSE

Well-differentiated stage IV neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have an extremely heterogeneous, unpredictable clinical behavior. Survival prognostic markers, such as the recently proposed NEP-Score, would be very useful for better defining therapeutic strategies. We aim to verify NEP-Score applicability in an independent cohort of stage IV well-differentiated (WD) gastroentero-pancreatic (GEP) NEN, and identify a derivate prognostic marker taking into account clinical and pathological characteristics at diagnosis.

METHODS

Age, site of primary tumor, primary tumor surgery, symptoms, Ki67, timing of metastases of 27 patients (10 females; mean age at diagnosis 60.2 ± 2.9 years) with stage IV WD GEP NEN were evaluated to calculate the NEP-Score at the end of follow-up (NEP-T). We calculated the NEP-Score at diagnosis (NEP-D), which does not consider the appearance of new metastases during follow-up. Patients were subdivided according to whether they were alive or not at the end of follow-up (EOF) and an NEP-Score threshold was investigated to predict survival.

RESULTS

Mean NEP-T and mean NEP-D were significantly lower in 15 live patients as compared to 12 deceased patients (p < 0.01) at EOF. We identified an NEP-D = 116 as the cutoff that significantly predicts survival. No gender differences were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, we confirmed NEP-Score applicability. In addition, we propose NEP-D as a simple, quick and cheap prognostic score that can help clinicians in decision making. NEP-D threshold can predict NEN aggressiveness and may be used to define the best personalized therapeutic strategy.

Surgical Strategy Based on Radiological 3D Reconstruction in a Giant Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Interdisciplinary Approach

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare entity and are most commonly found in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. The clinical outcome depends on the potential resectability, grade, and stage. Here, we report a case of a tumor debulking in a metastatic NET of the pancreas. A 25-year-old woman with stable metastatic NET of the pancreas G2 T4N1M1 (hepatic, extrahepatic) already underwent several therapies. Case Presentation. A 25-year-old woman with stable metastatic NET of the pancreas G2 T4N1M1 (hepatic, extrahepatic) already underwent several pharmaceutical therapies. Due to the young age, the G2 characteristic, and the stable liver disease, the decision for debulking was made. Based on a 3D CT scan, an embolization was successfully performed directly prior to a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection, advanced interaortocaval lymph node dissection, and an atypical liver resection within segment VI. Histological workup revealed a stage pT3, G2, pN1 (29/34), pM1c (hepatic and extrahepatic), L1, V0, Pn0 with complete surgical resection of the primary tumor (180 mm). The excision of the liver segment V showed a completely resected metastasis.

Conclusions

In this patient, extensive surgery of a pancreatic NET with the aim of a prolonged progression-free survival was performed. Close cooperation between different disciplines is absolutely mandatory. Modern imaging allowed a precise therapy plan to be worked out.

Tumor Heterogenity in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia

Owing to the rarity and the biological and clinical heterogeneity of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEP NEN), the management of these patients may be challenging for physicians. This review highlights the specific features of GEP NEN with particular attention on the role of Ki67 heterogeneity, the potential prognostic role of novel radiological techniques, and the clinical usefulness of functional imaging, including 68Ga-DOTA-SST PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Understanding these specific features may help to plan proper and tailored follow-up programs and therapeutic approaches.

Occurrence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogs

BACKGROUND

Although exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) has been described in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs), its role in the therapeutic management of these patients is not well established.

AIM

To determine the frequency of EPI in patients with NEN long-term treated with SSAs.

METHODS

This is a prospective single-center study evaluating 35 patients treated with SSAs for >12 months due to unresectable/advanced nonpancreatic well-differentiated NEN. Clinical evaluation, biochemical parameters, and fecal elastases 1 (FE-1) were assessed to diagnose EPI.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients (20%) had EPI, given the presence of abdominal symptoms and a median FE-1 value of 180 mcg/g stool (150-198). No patient had severe EPI, defined as FE-1 < 100 mcg/g stool. Elevated glycated Hb levels were a significant predictor for developing EPI (OR 4.81, p = 0.01). No significant difference in terms of duration of SSA treatment was observed between patients with or without EPI diagnosed (84 months and 72 months, respectively; p = 0.950).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild-moderate EPI is a relatively common condition in patients receiving long-term treatment with SSAs. Specific clinical and biochemical evaluations, including FE-1, should be planned in these patients to diagnose this relevant condition early, which may deteriorate quality of life and cause malnutrition.

Optimal strategy of systemic treatment for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based upon opinion of Japanese experts

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

A number of therapeutic agents have been reported to be clinically useful for the management of the patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) including somatostatin analogues, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic agents. However, the optimal strategy for selection among those treatment modalities above in these patients has remained unexplored.

METHODS

Japanese experts for PanNET discussed and determined the optimal treatment strategies according to the results of previously reported studies.

RESULTS

The tumor volume of liver metastases and the Ki-67 labeling index were unanimously accepted as indicators of the tumor burden and tumor aggressiveness, respectively, which are two most clinically pivotal factors for determining the strategy of systemic treatment for unresectable PanNETs. In addition, for those with a relatively small tumor burden and slow disease progression, somatostatin analogues were selected as the first-line treatment agents. For those with a relatively large tumor burden and rapid tumor progression, cytotoxic agents were selected, possibly aiming at tumor shrinkage. For those of intermediate tumor volume and/or growth rate, molecular-targeted agents were selected as the first choice. Based on this strategy discussed among the experts, we tentatively prepared a MAP for proposing optimal treatment strategy and examined its validity in some patients with unresectable PanNETs. Results validated the usefulness of this MAP proposed for patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs.

CONCLUSION

We herein propose a tentative MAP for optimal treatment selection for the patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs. Further large scale studies are, however, warranted to validate the usefulness of this MAP proposed in this study.

Liver Tumor Burden in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: CT Features and Texture Analysis in the Prediction of Tumor Grade and 18F-FDG Uptake

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are a rare group of neoplasms that often present with liver metastases. Histological characteristics, metabolic behavior, and liver tumor burden (LTB) are important prognostic factors. In this study, the usefulness of texture analysis of liver metastases in evaluating the biological aggressiveness of p-NETs was assessed. Fifty-six patients with liver metastases from p-NET were retrospectively enrolled. Qualitative and quantitative CT features of LTB were evaluated. Histogram-derived parameters of liver metastases were calculated and correlated with the tumor grade (G) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) standardized uptake value (SUV). Arterial relative enhancement was inversely related with G (−0.37, p = 0.006). Different metastatic spread patterns of LTB were not associated with histological grade. Arterial_entropy was significantly correlated to G (−0.368, p = 0.038) and to Ki67 percentage (−0.421, p = 0.018). The ROC curve for the Arterial_entropy reported an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.545–0.928, p = 0.035) in the identification of G1–2 tumors. Arterial_uniformity values were correlated to G (0.346, p = 0.005) and Ki67 levels (0.383, p = 0.033). Arterial_entropy values were directly correlated with the SUV (0.449, p = 0.047) which was inversely correlated with Arterial_uniformity (−0.499, p = 0.025). Skewness and kurtosis reported no significant correlations. In conclusion, histogram-derived parameters may predict adverse histological features and metabolic behavior of p-NET liver metastases.

177Lu-PRRT in advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: 10-year follow-up of the IRST phase II prospective study

PURPOSE

In March 2014, we reported the activity and safety of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) at two different dosages (18.5 GBq and 27.5 GBq in 5 cycles) in patients with progressive metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). Disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity were addressed. Herein, we report the late toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the same cohort after a 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, disease-oriented prospective phase II trial. From March 2008 to June 2011, 43 patients received 3.7 GBq or 5.5 GBq of Lu-PRRT every 6 to 8 weeks, each cycle repeated 5 times. All patients showed ⁶⁸Gallium-DOTA-peptide PET/Octreoscan® positivity (score 3-4 Rotterdam scale) in known lesions. Tumor burden was estimated radiologically. Time-to-event data (PFS and OS) were described using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (28 males and 15 females) were evaluable and were monitored for a median period of 118 months (range 12.6-139.6). Median PFS in patients receiving 18.5 GBq was 59.8 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 14.3-79.6), identical to that of patients treated with 27.5 GBq (59.8 months, 95% CI 23.4-82.0). Median OS was 71.0 months (95% CI 46.1-107.3) in the group who received 18.5 GBq and 97.6 months (95% CI 64.3-not reached) in the group treated with 27.5 GBq (P = 0.22). Patients with progression limited to lymph nodes showed significantly longer median PFS and OS than those with hepatic lesions (P = 0.02 for PFS and P = 0.04 for OS). Age over 65 years at the time of PRRT was also significant for OS. Of note, no late hematological or renal toxicity was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up of the IRST phase II study shows that Lu-PRRT is a safe and effective therapy for patients with advanced GI-NET, the most important prognostic factor being tumor burden, hepatic lesions, and age. We believe that Lu-PRRT should be offered to patients with early-stage disease.

Effect of metastatic site on survival in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). An analysis of SEER data from 2010 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) display variable behaviors based on origin and grade. We assumed that both tumor origin and the location of metastasis may play a role in survival.

METHODS

We queried the SEER database (2010-2014) for patients with an established diagnosis of NENs and documented site of metastasis and identified 2005 patients. Overall survival (OS) at the time points were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship of the interested variables and OS.

RESULTS

Lung, liver, bone and brain metastases were observed in 9, 77, 7 and 6% of metastatic patients respectively. In the multivariate model, metastasis locations were significantly associated with worse survival (liver HR: 1.677 (1.226-2.294); (bone metastasis HR: 1.412 (0.965-2.065); brain HR: 1.666 (1.177-2.357)). We produced a scoring system based on site of origin, metastasis location, age, gender, histology and tumor size that can stratify metastatic NEN patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories to help physicians with decision making.

CONCLUSION

Site of metastasis plays an important role in survival of metastatic NEN patients independent of commonly described prognostic factors and should be considered in survival estimates.

Histopathological Revision for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Expert Centers: Does It Make the Difference?

BACKGROUND

The correct histopathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) is crucial for treatment selection and prognostication. It is also very challenging due to limited experience in nonexpert centers. Revision of pathology is standard of care for most patients who are referred to NEN expert centers.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical impact of histopathological revision for GEP-NEN patients referred to an expert center.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter analysis of all GEP-NENs receiving a histopathological revision in 6 European NEN expert centers (January 2016 to December 2016) to evaluate the impact on patient management.

RESULTS

175 patients were included and 14.7% referred for a second opinion. Histological samples were 69.1% biopsies, 23.4% surgical specimens, and 7.5% endoscopic resections. Histopathological changes due to revision included first assessment of Ki67 in 8.6% of cases, change in grading in 11.4% (3.4% G1 to G2; 5.7% G2 to G1; 0.6% G2 to G3; 1.7% G3 to G2), definition of tumor invasion in 10.8%, additional immunohistochemical staining in 2.3%, diagnosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in 3.4%, exclusion of NEN in 3.4%, first diagnosis of NEN in 2.3%, and tumor differentiation for G3 in 1.7%. The revision had a clinical impact in 36.0% of patients, leading to a new therapeutic indication in 26.3%. The indication to then perform a new imaging test occurred in 21.1% and recommendation to follow-up with no further treatment in 6.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological revision in expert centers for NENs can change the diagnosis, with a significant clinical impact in about one third of patients.

Impact of liver tumour burden, alkaline phosphatase elevation, and target lesion size on treatment outcomes with 177Lu-Dotatate: an analysis of the NETTER-1 study

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of baseline liver tumour burden, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) elevation, and target lesion size on treatment outcomes with ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate.

METHODS

In the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial, patients with advanced, progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NET) were randomised to 177Lu-Dotatate (every 8 weeks, four cycles) plus octreotide long-acting release (LAR) or to octreotide LAR 60 mg. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analyses of PFS by baseline factors, including liver tumour burden, ALP elevation, and target lesion size, were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Significantly prolonged median PFS occurred with ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate versus octreotide LAR 60 mg in patients with low (< 25%), moderate (25-50%), and high (> 50%) liver tumour burden (HR 0.187, 0.216, 0.145), and normal or elevated ALP (HR 0.153, 0.177), and in the presence or absence of a large target lesion (diameter > 30 mm; HR, 0.213, 0.063). Within the ¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate arm, no significant difference in PFS was observed amongst patients with low/moderate/high liver tumour burden (P = 0.7225) or with normal/elevated baseline ALP (P = 0.3532), but absence of a large target lesion was associated with improved PFS (P = 0.0222). Grade 3 and 4 liver function abnormalities were rare and did not appear to be associated with high baseline liver tumour burden.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁷⁷Lu-Dotatate demonstrated significant prolongation in PFS versus high-dose octreotide LAR in patients with advanced, progressive midgut NET, regardless of baseline liver tumour burden, elevated ALP, or the presence of a large target lesion. Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01578239, EudraCT: 2011-005049-11.

Residual tumor volume discriminates prognosis after surgery for neuroendocrine liver metastasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We developed objective measurements of preoperative and residual tumor volume, and debulking rate, to evaluate their prognostic value for neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM).

METHODS

Seventy-three patients who underwent surgery for NELM were analyzed retrospectively. Indices of preoperative and postoperative residual tumor volume (pre-volume index [VI] and post-VI) were calculated as the sum of the cubes of individual tumor diameters on preoperative and postoperative imaging, respectively. The debulking rate (%) was calculated as 100 - 100 × post-VI/pre-VI. The classification and regression trees method was used to classify pre-VI and post-VI.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) was discriminated by preoperative tumor volume (5-year OS rates, 87.8% for low pre-VI and 60.1% for high pre-VI; P = .037) and residual tumor volume (5-year OS rates, 88.1% for low post-VI and 24.8% for high post-VI; P < .001). In contrast, debulking rates of 100%, ≥90%, and <90% did not discriminate OS (5-year OS rates, 88.0%, 61.9%, and 58.9%, respectively, not significant). In multivariate analysis, residual tumor volume (high post-VI, hazard ratio, 6.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-32.3) was an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective measurement of tumor volume demonstrates that residual tumor volume is prognostic after surgery for NELM.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.

Prognostic impact of tumour burden in stage IV neuroendocrine neoplasia: A comparison between pancreatic and gastrointestinal localizations

BACKGROUND

Although prognosis of NENs is affected by several features including tumour burden, the specific role of this factor in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) and gastrointestinal NENs (GI NENs) is not well established.

AIM

To compare the prognostic role of tumour burden in PanNENs and GI NENs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of stage IV PanNENs and GI NENs. Tumours were classified based on liver tumour volume (<25% or >25%). Overall survival as assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards method was used to perform risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 300 patients, including 166 panNENs (55.3%) and 134 GI NENs (44.7%). A total of 158 patients (52.7%) had G2 tumours, 107 had G1 tumours (35.7%), and 35 had G3 tumours (11.6%). Tumour liver involvement >25% was observed in 187 patients (62.3%): 106 PanNENs (56.7%), and 81 GI NENs (43.3%) (p = 0.551). Bone metastases were present in 45 patients (15%): 22 PanNENs (13.2%) and 23 GI NENs (17.1%) (p = 0.416). Characteristics of the PanNENs, including: grading (G2 vs G1, HR = 3.7; G3 vs G1, HR = 16.40), liver involvement > 25% (HR = 3.09), and bone metastases (HR = 2.27) were independent predictors for poor survival, whereas the only significant risk factor in GI NENs was grading (G2 vs G1, HR = 4.36; G3 vs G1, HR = 8.60).

CONCLUSIONS

PanNENs and GI NENs have different risk profiles. Liver tumour volume and the presence of bone metastases significantly affect survival in patients with PanNENs but has no impact on the clinical outcomes of GI NENs.

Tumour type and size are prognostic factors in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia: A multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are defined as type I if associated with atrophic body gastritis and type III when tumour is sporadic. This classification, together with grading and size, plays a crucial prognostic role. Nevertheless, the impact of these features on clinical outcome is not clear.

AIM

To identify factors predicting poor outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analysis of type I and type III gNEN. A composite endpoint was defined if tumour-related death or metastases or angioinvasion were observed.

RESULTS

156 gNENs were evaluated: 137 (87.8%) type I and 19 (12.2%) type III. Among type I, 103 were G1 (75.2%) and 34 (24.8%) were G2. In type III group, 8 were G1 (42.1%), 10 were G2 (52.6%), and 1 was G3 (5.3%). Negative endpoint occurred in 18 patients including 10 type III and 8 type I. Male gender (p = 0.032), tumour type (p = 0.003) and size >10 mm (p = 0.024) were predictors for poor outcome, whereas Ki67 was not confirmed on multivariate analysis (p = 0.192). 5-yr survival rates in type I and type III were 100% and 76.2%, respectively (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour size, tumour type and gender affect clinical outcome in gNENs. In contrast to NENs rising from other sites, Ki67 plays a less important role.

Multidisciplinary Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Real-World Experience from a Referral Center

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary approach is widely advised for an effective care of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN). Since data on efficacy of multidisciplinary management of NENs patients in referral centers are scanty, this study aimed at analyzing the modality of presentation and clinical outcome of patients with NENs managed by a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we included all consecutive new patients visiting the Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome (ENETS-Center of Excellence) between January 2014 and June 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were evaluated. The most frequent sites were pancreas (38.5%), small bowel (22%), and lung (9.7%). Median Ki67 was 3%. After the first visit at the center, additional radiological and/or nuclear medicine procedures were requested in 163 patients (83.6%), whereas histological data revision was advised in 84 patients (43.1%) (revision of histological slides: 27.7%, new bioptic sampling: 15.4%). After that, disease imaging staging and grading was modified in 30.7% and 17.9% of patients, respectively. Overall, a change in therapeutic management was proposed in 98 patients (50.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary approach in a dedicated team may lead to change of disease imaging staging and grading in a significant proportion of patients. Enhancing referral routes to dedicated-NEN center should be promoted, since it may improve patients' clinical outcome.

Lung Metastases in Patients with Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Appraisal of the Validity of Thoracic Imaging Surveillance

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the impact of lung metastases (LM) on overall survival (OS) in well-differentiated (WD) stage IV gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) patients along with developing surveillance strategies for thoracic imaging.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with LM, from 3 centres, were identified (22 small intestine/12 pancreatic; 17 grade 1/15 grade 2/2 of unknown grade). For comparison, we used 106 stage IV WD, grade 1 and 2 GEP-NEN patients with metastatic disease confined in the abdomen.

RESULTS

LM prevalence was 4.9% (34/692). Eleven patients (32%) presented with synchronous LM whereas 23 (68%) developed metachronous LM at a median of 25 months (range 1-150 months). Patients with metachronous LM had already established liver and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases. Eighteen of 23 patients (78%) with metachronous LM exhibited concomitant progression in the abdomen. Median OS of WD GEP-NEN patients with LM was shorter than for those with stage IV disease without extra-abdominal metastases (56 [95% CI 40.6-71.6] vs. 122.7 [95% CI 70.7-174.8] months; log-rank p = 0.001). Among patients with progressive stage IV disease, the subset of patients with LM exhibited shorter OS (log-rank p = 0.005). LM were also confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for survival in multivariable analysis (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07-0.45; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

LM, although relatively rare in patients with WD stage IV GEP-NENs, may impact patients' outcome. The development of metachronous LM is associated with concomitant disease progression in established abdominal metastases in most patients. These patient-related parameters could be utilized for a stratified surveillance approach, mainly reserving thoracic imaging for GEP-NEN patients with progressive disease in the abdomen.

Correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and response to temozolomide-based therapy in neuroendocrine neoplasms: an observational retrospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TEM) based therapy has been reported being effective in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), with response rates ranging from 30 to 70%. Among patients affected by advanced glioblastoma or melanoma and treated with TEM, loss of tumoral O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is correlated with improved survival. In NEN patients, the role of MGMT deficiency in predicting clinical outcomes of TEM treatment is still under debate.

METHODS

In this study we evaluated 95 patients with advanced NENs undergoing treatment with TEM-based therapy. MGMT promoter methylation status was evaluated with two techniques: methylation specific-polymerase chain reaction or pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

Treatment with TEM-based therapy was associated with an overall response rate of 27.4% according to RECIST criteria (51.8% of patients with and 17.7% without MGMT promoter methylation). Response to therapy, progression free survival and overall survival was correlated to MGMT status at univariate and multivariate analysis. Methylation of MGMT promoter could be a strong predictive factor of objective response and an important prognostic factor of a longer PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, MGMT methylation status, evaluated with methylation specific-polymerase chain reaction or pyrosequencing, should have an important role in patients with metastatic NENs, in order to guide therapeutic options. These results need further confirmation with prospective studies.

A classification prognostic score to predict OS in stage IV well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

No validated prognostic tool is available for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). This study, conducted in three independent cohorts of patients from five different European countries, aimed to develop and validate a classification prognostic score for OS in patients with stage IV WDNETs. We retrospectively collected data on 1387 patients: (i) patients treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy; n = 515); (ii) European cohort of rare NET patients included in the European RARECAREnet database (n = 457); (iii) Italian multicentric cohort of pancreatic NET (pNETs) patients treated at 24 Italian institutions (n = 415). The score was developed using data from patients included in cohort (i) (training set); external validation was performed by applying the score to the data of the two independent cohorts (ii) and (iii) evaluating both calibration and discriminative ability (Harrell C statistic). We used data on age, primary tumor site, metastasis (synchronous vs metachronous), Ki-67, functional status and primary surgery to build the score, which was developed for classifying patients into three groups with differential 10-year OS: (I) favorable risk group: 10-year OS ≥70%; (II) intermediate risk group: 30% ≤ 10-year OS < 70%; (III) poor risk group: 10-year OS <30%. The Harrell C statistic was 0.661 in the training set, and 0.626 and 0.601 in the RARECAREnet and Italian multicentric validation sets, respectively. In conclusion, based on the analysis of three 'field-practice' cohorts collected in different settings, we defined and validated a prognostic score to classify patients into three groups with different long-term prognoses.

Clinical Usefulness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Advanced Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background

The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic algorithm of entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP NENs) is unclear because most available data derive from heterogeneous populations in terms of tumor biology and disease status at time of examination. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of 18F-FDG PET to identify patients with more aggressive disease among those with advanced EP NENs.

Subjects, Materials, and Methods . Patients with advanced EP NENs and known disease status (progressive disease [PD] or stable disease [SD]) according to imaging procedures, who received 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography scans during a time frame of 1 month, were included.

Results

A total of 93 patients, including 69 patients with pancreatic NENs and 24 patients with small-intestine NENs, were included. At the time of study entry, 64 patients (68.8%) had PD, and the remaining 29 patients (31.2%) had SD. A total of 62 patients (66.7%) had positive 18F-FDG PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET was negative in the remaining 31 patients (33.3%). Overall, 18F-FDG PET sensitivity and specificity to detect PD were 90.6% and 86.2%, respectively, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2%. A positive 18F-FDG PET was significantly associated with PD at the time of study entry (p &lt; .0001 at multivariate analysis). Although a higher proportion of 18F-FDG PET-positive examinations were observed in patients with higher tumor grade (p = .01), 53.8% of patients with grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had positive 18F-FDG PET, and 37.5% of patients with grade 2 NETs had negative 18F-FDG PET. Overall survival was significantly shorter in 18F-FDG PET-positive patients (median: 60 months) in comparison with 18F-FDG PET-negative patients (median not reached; p = .008).

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET has a high diagnostic accuracy to identify progression of disease with unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with advanced EP NENs. Knowledge of disease status and G grading are key factors for physicians to better select patients for whom 18F-FDG PET is clinically useful.

Implications for Practice

The findings of the present study may help physicians dealing with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms to select patients for whom 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useful to predict poor clinical outcome.

Clinical Usefulness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnostic Algorithm of Advanced Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in the diagnostic algorithm of entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EP NENs) is unclear because most available data derive from heterogeneous populations in terms of tumor biology and disease status at time of examination. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of 18F-FDG PET to identify patients with more aggressive disease among those with advanced EP NENs. Subjects, Materials, and Methods . Patients with advanced EP NENs and known disease status (progressive disease [PD] or stable disease [SD]) according to imaging procedures, who received 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography scans during a time frame of 1 month, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients, including 69 patients with pancreatic NENs and 24 patients with small-intestine NENs, were included. At the time of study entry, 64 patients (68.8%) had PD, and the remaining 29 patients (31.2%) had SD. A total of 62 patients (66.7%) had positive 18F-FDG PET, whereas 18F-FDG PET was negative in the remaining 31 patients (33.3%). Overall, 18F-FDG PET sensitivity and specificity to detect PD were 90.6% and 86.2%, respectively, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 89.2%. A positive 18F-FDG PET was significantly associated with PD at the time of study entry (p < .0001 at multivariate analysis). Although a higher proportion of 18F-FDG PET-positive examinations were observed in patients with higher tumor grade (p = .01), 53.8% of patients with grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) had positive 18F-FDG PET, and 37.5% of patients with grade 2 NETs had negative 18F-FDG PET. Overall survival was significantly shorter in 18F-FDG PET-positive patients (median: 60 months) in comparison with 18F-FDG PET-negative patients (median not reached; p = .008).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET has a high diagnostic accuracy to identify progression of disease with unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with advanced EP NENs. Knowledge of disease status and G grading are key factors for physicians to better select patients for whom 18F-FDG PET is clinically useful.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings of the present study may help physicians dealing with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms to select patients for whom 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useful to predict poor clinical outcome.