Alpha-Particle Exposure Induces Mainly Unstable Complex Chromosome Aberrations which do not Contribute to Radiation-Associated Cytogenetic Risk

Dose-Dependent Transmissibility of Chromosome Aberrations in Human Lymphocytes at First Mitosis. II. Biological Effectiveness of Heavy Charged Particles Versus Gamma Rays

Chromosome aberrations (CAs) are large scale structural rearrangements to the genome that have been used as a proxy endpoint of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. And yet, many types of CAs are incapable of causing either of these effects simply because they are lethal. Using 24-color multi-fluor combinatorial painting (mFISH), we examined CAs in normal human lymphocytes exposed to graded doses of 1 GeV/nucleon accelerated 56Fe ions and 662 keV 137Cs gamma rays. As expected, the high-linear energy transfer (LET) heavy ions were considerably more potent per unit dose at producing total yields of CAs compared to low-LET gamma rays. As also anticipated, the frequency distribution of aberrations per cell exposed to 56Fe ions was significantly overdispersed compared to the Poisson distribution, containing excess numbers of cells devoid of aberrations. We used the zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) distribution to model these data. Based on objective cytogenetic criteria that are subject to caveats we discuss, each cell was individually evaluated in terms of likely survival (i.e., its ability to transmit to daughter cell progeny). For 56Fe ion irradiations, the frequency of surviving cells harboring complex aberrations represented a significant portion of aberration-bearing cells, while for gamma irradiation no survivable cells containing complex aberrations were observed. When the dose responses for the two radiation types were compared, and the analysis was limited to surviving cells that contained aberrations, we were surprised to find the high-LET 56Fe ions only marginally more potent than the low-LET gamma rays for doses less than 1 Gy. In fact, based on dose-response modeling, they were predicted to be less effective than gamma rays at somewhat higher doses. The major implication of these findings is that measures of relative biological effectiveness that fail to account for coincident lethality will tend to overstate the impact of transmissible chromosomal damage from high-LET particle exposure.

Chromatin and the Cellular Response to Particle Radiation-Induced Oxidative and Clustered DNA Damage

Exposure to environmental ionizing radiation is prevalent, with greatest lifetime doses typically from high Linear Energy Transfer (high-LET) alpha particles via the radioactive decay of radon gas in indoor air. Particle radiation is highly genotoxic, inducing DNA damage including oxidative base lesions and DNA double strand breaks. Due to the ionization density of high-LET radiation, the consequent damage is highly clustered wherein ≥2 distinct DNA lesions occur within 1–2 helical turns of one another. These multiply-damaged sites are difficult for eukaryotic cells to resolve either quickly or accurately, resulting in the persistence of DNA damage and/or the accumulation of mutations at a greater rate per absorbed dose, relative to lower LET radiation types. The proximity of the same and different types of DNA lesions to one another is challenging for DNA repair processes, with diverse pathways often confounding or interplaying with one another in complex ways. In this context, understanding the state of the higher order chromatin compaction and arrangements is essential, as it influences the density of damage produced by high-LET radiation and regulates the recruitment and activity of DNA repair factors. This review will summarize the latest research exploring the processes by which clustered DNA damage sites are induced, detected, and repaired in the context of chromatin.

Low dose radiation mechanisms: The certainty of uncertainty

This paper reviews the current understanding of low dose radiobiology, and how it has evolved from classical target theory. It highlights the uncertainty around low dose effects, which is due in part to the complexity of "context" surrounding the ultimate expression of biological effects following low dose exposure. The paper makes special reference to low dose non-targeted effects which, are currently ignored in radiation protection and population level risk assessment, because it is unclear what they mean for risk. The view of the authors is that this "lack of clarity" about what the effects mean is precisely the point. It indicates the uncertainty of outcomes after a given exposure. The uncertainty stems from multiple outcome options resulting from the intrinsic uncertainty of the stochastic interaction of low dose radiation with matter. This uncertainty should be embraced rather than eschewed. The impacts of the uncertainties identified in this paper is explored and an approach to quantifying mutation probability in relation to dose is presented.

Dose-dependent Transmissibility of Chromosome Aberrations at First Mitosis after Exposure to Gamma Rays. I. Modeling and Implications Related to Risk Assessment

The relationship between certain chromosomal aberration (CA) types and cell lethality is well established. On that basis we used multi-fluor in situ hybridization (mFISH) to tally the number of mitotic human lymphocytes exposed to graded doses of gamma rays that carried either lethal or nonlethal CA types. Despite the fact that a number of nonlethal complex exchanges were observed, the cells containing them were seldom deemed viable, due to coincident lethal chromosome damage. We considered two model variants for describing the dose responses. The first assumes independent linear-quadratic (LQ) dose response shapes for the yields of both lethal and nonlethal CAs. The second (simplified) variant assumes that the mean number of nonlethal CAs per cell is proportional to the mean number of lethal CAs per cell, meaning that the shapes and magnitudes of both aberration types differ only by a multiplicative proportionality constant. Using these models allowed us to assemble dose response curves for the frequency of aberration-bearing cells that would be expected to survive. This took the form of a joint probability distribution for cells containing ≥1 nonlethal CAs but having zero lethal CAs. The simplified second model variant turned out to be marginally better supported than the first, and the joint probability distribution based on this model yielded a crescent-shaped dose response reminiscent of those observed for mutagenesis and transformation for cells "at risk" (i.e. not corrected for survival). Among the implications of these findings is the suggestion that similarly shaped curves form the basis for deriving metrics associated with radiation risk models.

Chromosome Aberrations in Lymphocytes of Patients Undergoing Radon Spa Therapy: An Explorative mFISH Study

In the present exploratory study, we aim to elucidate the action of radon in vivo and to assess the possible health risks. Chromosome aberrations were analyzed in lymphocytes of two patients (P1, P2) undergoing radon spa therapy in Bad Steben (Germany). Both patients, suffering from painful chronic degenerative disorders of the spine and joints, received nine baths (1.2 kBq/L at 34 °C) over a 3-week period. Chromosome aberrations were analyzed before and 6, 12 and 30 weeks after the start of therapy using the high-resolution multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) technique. For comparison, the lymphocytes from two healthy donors (HD1, HD2) were examined. P1 had a higher baseline aberration frequency than P2 and both healthy donors (5.3 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 0.8, 1.4 ± 0.3 and 1.1 ± 0.1 aberrations/100 analyzed metaphases, respectively). Complex aberrations, biomarkers of densely ionizing radiation, were found in P1, P2 and HD1. Neither the aberration frequency nor the fraction of complex aberrations increased after radon spa treatment, i.e., based on biological dosimetry, no increased health risk was found. It is worth noting that a detailed breakpoint analysis revealed potentially clonal aberrations in both patients. Altogether, our data show pronounced inter-individual differences with respect to the number and types of aberrations, complicating the risk analysis of low doses such as those received during radon therapy.