1
|
Dutzmann CM, Spix C, Popp I, Kaiser M, Erdmann F, Erlacher M, Dörk T, Schindler D, Kalb R, Kratz CP. Cancer in Children With Fanconi Anemia and Ataxia-Telangiectasia-A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study in Germany. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:32-39. [PMID: 34597127 PMCID: PMC8683217 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fanconi anemia (FA) and ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) are rare inherited syndromes characterized by abnormal DNA damage response and caused by pathogenic variants in key DNA repair proteins that are also relevant in the pathogenesis of breast cancer and other cancer types. The risk of cancer in children with these diseases is poorly understood and has never been assessed in a population-based cohort before. METHODS We identified 421 patients with FA and 160 patients with AT diagnosed between 1973 and 2020 through German DNA repair disorder reference laboratories. We linked patients' laboratory data with childhood cancer data from the German Childhood Cancer Registry. RESULTS Among 421 patients with FA, we observed 33 cases of childhood cancer (15 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome; seven cases of acute myeloid leukemia; two cases of lymphoma, carcinoma, medulloblastoma, and nephroblastoma, respectively; and one case of rhabdomyosarcoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and glioma, respectively) versus 0.74 expected (on the basis of population-based incidence rates in Germany). This corresponds to a 39-fold increased risk (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 39; 95% CI, 26 to 56). For all FA subgroups combined, the cancer-specific SIR for myeloid neoplasms was 445 (95% CI, 272 to 687). Among the 160 patients with AT, we observed 19 cases of childhood cancer (15 cases of lymphoma, three cases of leukemia, and one case of medulloblastoma) versus 0.32 expected. This corresponds to a 56-fold increased risk (SIR = 56; 95% CI, 33 to 88). The cancer-specific SIR for Hodgkin lymphoma was 215 (95% CI, 58 to 549) and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma 470 (95% CI, 225 to 865). CONCLUSION Approximately 11% of patients with FA and 14% of patients with AT develop cancer by age 18 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M. Dutzmann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Claudia Spix
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Isabell Popp
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, Biocenter, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friederike Erdmann
- Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Miriam Erlacher
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Detlev Schindler
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, Biocenter, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Reinhard Kalb
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Würzburg, Biocenter, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christian P. Kratz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany,Christian P. Kratz, MD, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology and Rare Disease Program, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Early life ionizing radiation exposure and cancer risks: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:45-56. [PMID: 32910229 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04803-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ionizing radiation use for medical diagnostic purposes has substantially increased over the last three decades. Moderate to high doses of radiation are well established causes of cancer, especially for exposure at young ages. However, cancer risk from low-dose medical imaging is debated. OBJECTIVE To review the literature on cancer risks associated with prenatal and postnatal medical diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure among children and to assess this risk through a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search of five electronic databases supplemented by a hand search was performed to retrieve relevant epidemiological studies published from 2000 to 2019, including patients younger than 22 years of age exposed to medical imaging ionizing radiation. Pooled odds ratio (ORpooled) and pooled excess relative risk (ERRpooled) representing the excess of risk per unit of organ dose were estimated with a random effect model. RESULTS Twenty-four studies were included. For prenatal exposure (radiographs or CT), no significant increased risk was reported for all cancers, leukemia and brain tumors. For postnatal exposure, increased risk was observed only for CT, mostly for leukemia (ERRpooled=26.9 Gy-1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-57.1) and brain tumors (ERRpooled=9.1 Gy-1; 95% CI: 5.2-13.1). CONCLUSION CT exposure in childhood appears to be associated with increased risk of cancer while no significant association was observed with diagnostic radiographs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Harbron RW, Pasqual E. Ionising radiation as a risk factor for lymphoma: a review. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:R151-R185. [PMID: 33017815 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abbe37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The ability of ionising radiation to induce lymphoma is unclear. Here, we present a narrative review of epidemiological evidence of the risk of lymphoma, including chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM), among various exposed populations including atomic bombing survivors, industrial and medical radiation workers, and individuals exposed for medical purposes. Overall, there is a suggestion of a positive dose-dependent association between radiation exposure and lymphoma. The magnitude of this association is highly imprecise, however, with wide confidence intervals frequently including zero risk. External comparisons tend to show similar incidence and mortality rates to the general population. Currently, there is insufficient information on the impact of age at exposure, high versus low linear energy transfer radiation, external versus internal or acute versus chronic exposures. Associations are stronger for males than females, and stronger for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and MM than for Hodgkin lymphoma, while the risk of radiation-induced CLL may be non-existent. This broad grouping of diverse diseases could potentially obscure stronger associations for certain subtypes, each with a different cell of origin. Additionally, the classification of malignancies as leukaemia or lymphoma may result in similar diseases being analysed separately, while distinct diseases are analysed in the same category. Uncertainty in cell of origin means the appropriate organ for dose response analysis is unclear. Further uncertainties arise from potential confounding or bias due to infectious causes and immunosuppression. The potential interaction between radiation and other risk factors is unknown. Combined, these uncertainties make lymphoma perhaps the most challenging malignancy to study in radiation epidemiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Harbron
- Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health, (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Pasqual
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health, (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baaken D, Hammer GP, Seidenbusch MC, Schneider K, Blettner M, Pokora R, Lorenz E. Reply to 'Comment on: Baaken D, Hammer GP, Seidenbusch MC, Schneider K, Spix C, Blettner M, Pokora R and Lorenz E 2019 Second follow-up of a German cohort on childhood cancer after exposure to postnatal diagnostic x-ray J. Radiol. Prot. 39 1074-91'. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:920-921. [PMID: 32840238 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aba344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D Baaken
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI) Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hauptmann M, Daniels RD, Cardis E, Cullings HM, Kendall G, Laurier D, Linet MS, Little MP, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Richardson DB, Stram DO, Thierry-Chef I, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Gilbert ES, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Summary Bias Assessment and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:188-200. [PMID: 32657347 PMCID: PMC8454205 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ionizing radiation is an established carcinogen, but risks from low-dose exposures are controversial. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII review of the epidemiological data in 2006, many subsequent publications have reported excess cancer risks from low-dose exposures. Our aim was to systematically review these studies to assess the magnitude of the risk and whether the positive findings could be explained by biases. METHODS Eligible studies had mean cumulative doses of less than 100 mGy, individualized dose estimates, risk estimates, and confidence intervals (CI) for the dose-response and were published in 2006-2017. We summarized the evidence for bias (dose error, confounding, outcome ascertainment) and its likely direction for each study. We tested whether the median excess relative risk (ERR) per unit dose equals zero and assessed the impact of excluding positive studies with potential bias away from the null. We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the ERR and assess consistency across studies for all solid cancers and leukemia. RESULTS Of the 26 eligible studies, 8 concerned environmental, 4 medical, and 14 occupational exposure. For solid cancers, 16 of 22 studies reported positive ERRs per unit dose, and we rejected the hypothesis that the median ERR equals zero (P = .03). After exclusion of 4 positive studies with potential positive bias, 12 of 18 studies reported positive ERRs per unit dose (P = .12). For leukemia, 17 of 20 studies were positive, and we rejected the hypothesis that the median ERR per unit dose equals zero (P = .001), also after exclusion of 5 positive studies with potential positive bias (P = .02). For adulthood exposure, the meta-ERR at 100 mGy was 0.029 (95% CI = 0.011 to 0.047) for solid cancers and 0.16 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.25) for leukemia. For childhood exposure, the meta-ERR at 100 mGy for leukemia was 2.84 (95% CI = 0.37 to 5.32); there were only two eligible studies of all solid cancers. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic assessments in this monograph showed that these new epidemiological studies are characterized by several limitations, but only a few positive studies were potentially biased away from the null. After exclusion of these studies, the majority of studies still reported positive risk estimates. We therefore conclude that these new epidemiological studies directly support excess cancer risks from low-dose ionizing radiation. Furthermore, the magnitude of the cancer risks from these low-dose radiation exposures was statistically compatible with the radiation dose-related cancer risks of the atomic bomb survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hauptmann
- Correspondence to: Michael Hauptmann, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane. Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Daniels RD, Cardis E, Cullings HM, Gilbert E, Hauptmann M, Kendall G, Laurier D, Linet MS, Little MP, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Richardson DB, Stram D, Thierry-Chef I, Schubauer-Berigan MK. Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2020; 2020:97-113. [PMID: 32657348 PMCID: PMC7610154 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Whether low-dose ionizing radiation can cause cancer is a critical and long-debated question in radiation protection. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation report by the National Academies in 2006, new publications from large, well-powered epidemiological studies of low doses have reported positive dose-response relationships. It has been suggested, however, that biases could explain these findings. We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological studies with mean doses less than 100 mGy published 2006-2017. We required individualized doses and dose-response estimates with confidence intervals. We identified 26 eligible studies (eight environmental, four medical, and 14 occupational), including 91 000 solid cancers and 13 000 leukemias. Mean doses ranged from 0.1 to 82 mGy. The excess relative risk at 100 mGy was positive for 16 of 22 solid cancer studies and 17 of 20 leukemia studies. The aim of this monograph was to systematically review the potential biases in these studies (including dose uncertainty, confounding, and outcome misclassification) and to assess whether the subset of minimally biased studies provides evidence for cancer risks from low-dose radiation. Here, we describe the framework for the systematic bias review and provide an overview of the eligible studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert D Daniels
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ethel Gilbert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | | | - Martha S Linet
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark P Little
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jay H Lubin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel Stram
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cancer incidence and spectrum among children with genetically confirmed Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum in Germany: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:619-623. [PMID: 32451468 PMCID: PMC7434760 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0911-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by defects on chromosome 11p15.5. The quantitative cancer risks in BWS patients depend on the underlying (epi)genotype but have not yet been assessed in a population-based manner. METHODS We identified a group of 321 individuals with a molecularly confirmed diagnosis of BWS and analysed the cancer incidence up to age 15 years and cancer spectrum by matching their data with the German Childhood Cancer Registry. RESULTS We observed 13 cases of cancer in the entire BWS cohort vs 0.4 expected. This corresponds to a 33-fold increased risk (standardised incidence ratio (SIR) = 32.6; 95% confidence interval = 17.3-55.7). The specific cancers included hepatoblastoma (n = 6); nephroblastoma (n = 4); astrocytoma (n = 1); neuroblastoma (n = 1) and adrenocortical carcinoma (n = 1). The cancer SIR was highest in patients with a paternal uniparental disomy of 11p15.5 (UPDpat). A high cancer risk remained when cases of cancer diagnosed prior to the BWS diagnosis were excluded. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms an increased cancer risk in children with BWS. Our findings suggest that the highest cancer risk is associated with UPDpat. We were unable to confirm an excessive cancer risk in patients with IC1 gain of methylation (IC1-GOM) and this finding requires further investigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Stern H, Seidenbusch M, Hapfelmeier A, Meierhofer C, Naumann S, Schmid I, Spix C, Ewert P. Increased Cancer Incidence Following up to 15 Years after Cardiac Catheterization in Infants under One Year between 1980 and 1998-A Single Center Observational Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E315. [PMID: 31979109 PMCID: PMC7074298 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence of cancer within the first 15 years of life in children who underwent cardiac catheterization under the age of one year. METHODS In this retrospective, single center study, 2770 infants (7.8% with trisomy 21) were studied. All infants underwent cardiac catheterization under one year of age between January 1980 and December 1998. Newly diagnosed cancer in the first 15 years of life was assessed through record linkage to the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR). Cancer risk in study patients was compared to the GCCR population of children less than 15 years. Patients with trisomy 21 were compared to the Danish Cytogenic Register for trisomy 21. Effective radiation doses were calculated for each tumor patient and 60 randomly selected patients who did not develop cancer. RESULTS In total, 24,472.5 person-years were analyzed. Sixteen children developed cancer, while 3.64 were expected (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-7.2, p < 0.001). There was no preferred cancer type. The observed incidence of leukemia and solid tumors in trisomy 21 was only slightly higher (1 in 476 py) than expected (1 in 609 py, p = 0.64). There was no direct relationship between the radiation dose and the incidence of cancer. CONCLUSION Cardiac catherization in the first year of life was associated with a significantly increased cancer risk in a population with congenital heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Stern
- German Heart Center Munich, Clinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 Muenchen, Germany; (C.M.); (S.N.); (P.E.)
| | - Michael Seidenbusch
- German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Munich, Germany;
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Grillparzerstr. 18, Alexander Hapfelmeier, D-81675 Muenchen, Germany;
| | - Christian Meierhofer
- German Heart Center Munich, Clinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 Muenchen, Germany; (C.M.); (S.N.); (P.E.)
| | - Susanne Naumann
- German Heart Center Munich, Clinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 Muenchen, Germany; (C.M.); (S.N.); (P.E.)
| | - Irene Schmid
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Dr. von Hauner Childrens Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Lindwurmstrasse 4, 80337 Muenchen, Germany;
| | - Claudia Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR), Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 69, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Peter Ewert
- German Heart Center Munich, Clinic for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Lazarettstrasse 36, D-80636 Muenchen, Germany; (C.M.); (S.N.); (P.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baaken D, Hammer GP, Seidenbusch MC, Schneider K, Spix C, Blettner M, Pokora R, Lorenz E. Second follow-up of a German cohort on childhood cancer incidence after exposure to postnatal diagnostic x-ray. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2019; 39:1074-1091. [PMID: 31342929 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab3506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Studies on children exposed to ionising radiation by computed tomography (CT) indicate an increased risk of leukemia and central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Evidence of the risks associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations, the most frequent examination in pediatric radiology, in which the radiation dose is up to 750 times lower compared to CT examinations, is less clear. This study presents results of the second follow-up for the risk of childhood cancer in a cohort of children (<15 years) with diagnostic x-ray exposure at a large German hospital during 1976-2003 followed for additional 10 years until 2016. With a latency period of 6 months, 92 998 children contributed 794 549 person-years. The median effective dose was 7 μSv. Hundred incident cancer cases were identified: 35 leukemia, 13 lymphomas, 12 CNS tumors, 15 blastomas, 15 sarcomas and 10 other solid tumors, consisting of six germ cells tumors, three thyroid cancers and one adrenocortical carcinoma. For all cancer cases combined the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.39), for leukemia 1.15 (95% CI 0.63-1.61), for lymphomas 1.03 (95% CI 0.55-1.76), for CNS tumors 0.65 (95% CI 0.34-1.14), for blastomas 1.77 (95% CI 0.91-2.91), for sarcomas 1.28 (95% CI 0.71-2.11) and for other solid tumors 2.38 (95% CI 1.14-4.38). Dose-response analysis using Poisson regression revealed no significant trend for dose groups. Results did not differ substantially with a latency period of 2 years for all cancer entities and 5 years for solid tumors in sensitivity analyses. Overall, the null results of the first follow-up were confirmed. Although an association between radiation exposure and a risk for certain solid tumors like thyroid cancer is known, the significantly increased SIR in the group of other solid tumors must be critically interpreted in the context of the small number of cases and the very low doses of radiation exposure in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Baaken
- Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sharma NK, Sharma R, Mathur D, Sharad S, Minhas G, Bhatia K, Anand A, Ghosh SP. Role of Ionizing Radiation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10:134. [PMID: 29867445 PMCID: PMC5963202 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ionizing radiation (IR) from terrestrial sources is continually an unprotected peril to human beings. However, the medical radiation and global radiation background are main contributors to human exposure and causes of radiation sickness. At high-dose exposures acute radiation sickness occurs, whereas chronic effects may persist for a number of years. Radiation can increase many circulatory, age related and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurodegenerative diseases occur a long time after exposure to radiation, as demonstrated in atomic bomb survivors, and are still controversial. This review discuss the role of IR in neurodegenerative diseases and proposes an association between neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to IR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel K. Sharma
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Rupali Sharma
- Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Deepali Mathur
- Neurobiology Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Shashwat Sharad
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Gillipsie Minhas
- Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Akshay Anand
- Neuroscience Research Lab, Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Sanchita P. Ghosh
- Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harbron RW, Chapple CL, O'Sullivan JJ, Lee C, McHugh K, Higueras M, Pearce MS. Cancer incidence among children and young adults who have undergone x-ray guided cardiac catheterization procedures. Eur J Epidemiol 2018; 33:393-401. [PMID: 29349586 PMCID: PMC5945801 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0357-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Children and young adults with heart disease appear to be at increased risk of developing cancer, although the reasons for this are unclear. A cohort of 11,270 individuals, who underwent cardiac catheterizations while aged ≤ 22 years in the UK, was established from hospital records. Radiation doses from cardiac catheterizations and CT scans were estimated. The cohort was matched with the NHS Central Register and NHS Transplant Registry to determine cancer incidence and transplantation status. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with associated confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The excess relative risk (ERR) of lymphohaematopoietic neoplasia was also calculated using Poisson regression. The SIR was raised for all malignancies (2.32, 95% CI 1.65, 3.17), lymphoma (8.34, 95% CI 5.22, 12.61) and leukaemia (2.11, 95% CI 0.82, 4.42). After censoring transplant recipients, post-transplant, the SIR was reduced to 0.90 (95% CI 0.49, 1.49) for all malignancies. All lymphomas developed post-transplant. The SIR for all malignancies developing 5 years from the first cardiac catheterization (2 years for leukaemia/lymphoma) remained raised (3.01, 95% CI 2.09, 4.19) but was again reduced after censoring transplant recipients (0.98, 95% CI 0.48, 1.77). The ERR per mGy bone marrow dose for lymphohaematopoietic neoplasia was reduced from 0.541 (95% CI 0.104, 1.807) to 0.018 (95% CI − 0.002, 0.096) where transplantation status was accounted for as a time-dependent background risk factor. In conclusion, transplantation appears to be a large contributor to elevated cancer rates in this patient group. This is likely to be mainly due to associated immunosuppression, however, radiation exposure may also be a contributing factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Harbron
- Institute of Health and Society, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK. .,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK.
| | - Claire-Louise Chapple
- Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - John J O'Sullivan
- Paediatric Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kieran McHugh
- Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Manuel Higueras
- Institute of Health and Society, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK.,Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda de Mazarredo, 14, 48009, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Mark S Pearce
- Institute of Health and Society, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Chemical and Radiation Threats and Hazards, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Umweltbelastung und Krebsrisiko im Kindesalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00112-017-0281-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
13
|
Dedhia K, Chang YF, Leonardis R, Chi DH. Is There a Need for Repeat Radiologic Examination of Children with Esophageal Coin Foreign Body? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 156:173-179. [PMID: 27576682 DOI: 10.1177/0194599816667039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To determine factors associated with the passage of coins. To determine the need for repeat preoperative chest x-ray (CXR) for esophageal coin foreign body. Setting Academic tertiary care center. Design Case series with chart review. Subjects and Methods Patient information was retrieved from an Institutional Review Board-approved database. We identified 1359 children with esophageal coin foreign bodies from 2001 to 2013. Patients with both initial diagnostic and immediate preoperative CXR were included. Results A total of 406 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 47 months (range, 1.8-194 months). On preoperative CXR, the position changed in 29 patients (7%). Age, type of coin, and location of coin were all statistically significant factors affecting the passage of the coin ( P < .0001). Coins in the distal esophagus were 9.3 times more likely to pass than coins in the proximal esophagus. The longer the object was in the esophagus, the less likely it was to pass. Conclusions This study characterizes when esophageal coins may pass. Age, type of coin, location of coin at initial x-ray, and length of time are all important considerations to determine if the coin will pass. This information may be used to counsel families about the likelihood of coins to pass and whether repeat x-ray is necessary prior to surgical removal. Additionally, it may be more cost-effective to obtain repeat films in select patients and prevent those from going to the operating theater who are more likely to pass the coin spontaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Dedhia
- 1 Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yue-Fang Chang
- 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Leonardis
- 1 Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,3 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David H Chi
- 1 Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baysson H, Journy N, Roué T, Ducou-Lepointe H, Etard C, Bernier MO. Exposition à la scanographie dans l’enfance et risque de cancer à long terme. Une synthèse des études épidémiologiques récentes. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:190-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
15
|
Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46:286-92. [PMID: 26481334 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3456-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many image-intensifier fluoroscopy systems have been replaced by flat-panel detectors in recent years. OBJECTIVE To compare the level of contrast, image resolution and radiation dose between an image-intensifier and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system in a pediatric radiology unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared two systems — a conventional image intensifier and a newer-generation flat-panel system. We measured image quality and radiation dose using a technical phantom. Additionally, we retrospectively compared age-matched fluoroscopic pediatric voiding cystourethrography (n = 15) and upper gastrointestinal investigations (n = 25). RESULTS In phantom studies image contrast was equal while image resolution was higher and mean radiation dose lower using the flat-panel system (P < 0.0001). In pediatric investigations, mean dose area product was significantly reduced on the flat-panel system for upper gastrointestinal investigation (45 ± 38 μGy*m2 vs. 11 ± 9 μGy*m2; P < 0.0001) and for voiding cystourethrography (18 ± 20 μGy*m2 vs. 10 ± 12 μGy*m2; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION The newer flat-panel system performs at lower dose levels with equal to better image quality and therefore seems to be the more suitable technique for pediatric fluoroscopy in comparison to image-intensifier systems.
Collapse
|
16
|
Yoshida K, Hayashida N, Fukushima Y, Ohtsuru A, Ohba T, Hasegawa A, Sato H, Shishido F, Yasui K, Kumagai A, Yusa T, Kudo T, Yamashita S, Takamura N. Changes in radiological imaging frequencies in children before and after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Radiol 2015. [PMID: 26219903 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0464-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant has raised concerns about radiation exposure, including medical radiation exposure such as X-ray and CT, in residents of Fukushima. MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared the numbers and the ratio of outpatients less than 10 years old who underwent imaging examinations [e.g., CT, X-ray, MRI, ultrasonography (US), etc.] at Fukushima Medical University hospital in Fukushima, Japan before (April 1, 2008-March 31, 2011) and after (April 1, 2011-March 31, 2014) the accident. RESULTS The number of outpatients less than 10 years old decreased after the accident. The number of outpatients less than 10 years old who underwent CT and X-ray examinations also significantly decreased after the accident (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the number of pediatric radiological examinations decreased after the accident in Fukushima. We should continue to communicate with patients and their families to ensure that they understand the risks and benefits of radiological imaging in order to overcome their concerns about the nuclear disaster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Yoshida
- Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.,Education Center for Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Naomi Hayashida
- Division of Promotion of Collaborative Research on Radiation and Environment Health Effects, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Akira Ohtsuru
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Ohba
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Arifumi Hasegawa
- Department of Radiation Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hisashi Sato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Fumio Shishido
- Department of Radiology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Yasui
- Education Center for Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Atsushi Kumagai
- Education Center for Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yusa
- Department of Radiological Technology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Kudo
- Department of Radioisotope Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shunichi Yamashita
- Department of Radiation Medical Sciences, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Noboru Takamura
- Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kratz CP, Franke L, Peters H, Kohlschmidt N, Kazmierczak B, Finckh U, Bier A, Eichhorn B, Blank C, Kraus C, Kohlhase J, Pauli S, Wildhardt G, Kutsche K, Auber B, Christmann A, Bachmann N, Mitter D, Cremer FW, Mayer K, Daumer-Haas C, Nevinny-Stickel-Hinzpeter C, Oeffner F, Schlüter G, Gencik M, Überlacker B, Lissewski C, Schanze I, Greene MH, Spix C, Zenker M. Cancer spectrum and frequency among children with Noonan, Costello, and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1392-7. [PMID: 25742478 PMCID: PMC4402457 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Somatic mutations affecting components of the Ras-MAPK pathway are a common feature of cancer, whereas germline Ras pathway mutations cause developmental disorders including Noonan, Costello, and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes. These ‘RASopathies' also represent cancer-prone syndromes, but the quantitative cancer risks remain unknown. Methods: We investigated the occurrence of childhood cancer including benign and malignant tumours of the central nervous system in a group of 735 individuals with germline mutations in Ras signalling pathway genes by matching their information with the German Childhood Cancer Registry. Results: We observed 12 cases of cancer in the entire RASopathy cohort vs 1.12 expected (based on German population-based incidence rates). This corresponds to a 10.5-fold increased risk of all childhood cancers combined (standardised incidence ratio (SIR)=10.5, 95% confidence interval=5.4–18.3). The specific cancers included juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia=4; brain tumour=3; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia=2; rhabdomyosarcoma=2; and neuroblastoma=1. The childhood cancer SIR in Noonan syndrome patients was 8.1, whereas that for Costello syndrome patients was 42.4. Conclusions: These data comprise the first quantitative evidence documenting that the germline mutations in Ras signalling pathway genes are associated with increased risks of both childhood leukaemia and solid tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Kratz
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - L Franke
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - H Peters
- Institute of Medical and Human Genetics, Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - N Kohlschmidt
- Institut für Klinische Genetik, Maximilianstr. 28D, Bonn 53111, Germany
| | - B Kazmierczak
- Praxis für Humangenetik, Schwachhauser Heerstr. 50 a-c, Bremen 28209, Germany
| | - U Finckh
- 220;BAG Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Dr. Eberhard & Partner, Brauhausstraße 4 44137, Dortmund, Germany
| | - A Bier
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Humangenetik, Gutenbergstraße 5, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - B Eichhorn
- Mitteldeutscher Praxisverbund Humangenetik, Friedrichstraße 34, Dresden 01067, Germany
| | - C Blank
- Praenatal-Medizin, Graf-Adolf-Str. 35-37, Düsseldorf 40210, Germany
| | - C Kraus
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 10, Erlangen 91054, Germany
| | - J Kohlhase
- Center for Human Genetics Freiburg, Heinrich-von-Stephan-Str. 5, Freiburg 79100, Germany
| | - S Pauli
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Göttingen, Heinrich-Düker-Weg 12, Göttingen 37073, Germany
| | - G Wildhardt
- bio.logis, Zentrum für Humangenetik, Altenhöferallee 3, Frankfurt 60438, Germany
| | - K Kutsche
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany
| | - B Auber
- MVZ genteQ, Falkenried 88, Hamburg D-20251, Germany
| | - A Christmann
- Praxis für Humangenetik, Kardinal-Wendel-Str. 14, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - N Bachmann
- Zentrum für Humangenetik, Bioscientia Ingelheim, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße 17, Ingelheim 55218, Germany
| | - D Mitter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - F W Cremer
- Zentrum für Humangenetik Mannheim, Harrlachweg 1, Mannheim 68163, Germany
| | - K Mayer
- Zentrum für Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsdiagnostik (MVZ), Lochhamer Straße 29, Martinsried 82152, Germany
| | - C Daumer-Haas
- Pränatal-Medizin München, Lachnerstraße 20, München 80639, Germany
| | - C Nevinny-Stickel-Hinzpeter
- Praxis für Humangenetik München, Synlab Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Humane Genetik, Lindwurmstraße 23, München 80337, Germany
| | - F Oeffner
- Genetikum Neu-Ulm, Wegenerstr. 15, Neu-Ulm 89231, Germany
| | - G Schlüter
- Pränatalmedizin und Genetik, MVZ, Bankgasse 3, Nürnberg 90402, Germany
| | - M Gencik
- Diagenos, Caprivistr. 30, Osnabrück 49076, Germany
| | - B Überlacker
- Institut für Medizinische Genetik und Molekulare Medizin, Paul-Schallück-Str. 8, Köln 50939, Germany
| | - C Lissewski
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - I Schanze
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - M H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NCI Shady Grove Room 6E456, Bethesda, MD 20850-9772, USA
| | - C Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - M Zenker
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Krille L, Dreger S, Schindel R, Albrecht T, Asmussen M, Barkhausen J, Berthold JD, Chavan A, Claussen C, Forsting M, Gianicolo EAL, Jablonka K, Jahnen A, Langer M, Laniado M, Lotz J, Mentzel HJ, Queißer-Wahrendorf A, Rompel O, Schlick I, Schneider K, Schumacher M, Seidenbusch M, Spix C, Spors B, Staatz G, Vogl T, Wagner J, Weisser G, Zeeb H, Blettner M. Risk of cancer incidence before the age of 15 years after exposure to ionising radiation from computed tomography: results from a German cohort study. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2015; 54:1-12. [PMID: 25567615 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0580-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this cohort study was to assess the risk of developing cancer, specifically leukaemia, tumours of the central nervous system and lymphoma, before the age of 15 years in children previously exposed to computed tomography (CT) in Germany. Data for children with at least one CT between 1980 and 2010 were abstracted from 20 hospitals. Cancer cases occurring between 1980 and 2010 were identified by stochastic linkage with the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR). For all cases and a sample of non-cases, radiology reports were reviewed to assess the underlying medical conditions at time of the CT. Cases were only included if diagnosis occurred at least 2 years after the first CT and no signs of cancer were recorded in the radiology reports. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) using incidence rates from the general population were estimated. The cohort included information on 71,073 CT examinations in 44,584 children contributing 161,407 person-years at risk with 46 cases initially identified through linkage with the GCCR. Seven cases had to be excluded due to signs possibly suggestive of cancer at the time of first CT. Overall, more cancer cases were observed (O) than expected (E), but this was mainly driven by unexpected and possibly biased results for lymphomas. For leukaemia, the SIR (SIR = O/E) was 1.72 (95 % CI 0.89-3.01, O = 12), and for CNS tumours, the SIR was 1.35 (95 % CI 0.54-2.78, O = 7). Despite careful examination of the medical information, confounding by indication or reverse causation cannot be ruled out completely and may explain parts of the excess. Furthermore, the CT exposure may have been underestimated as only data from the participating clinics were available. This should be taken into account when interpreting risk estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Krille
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372, Lyon, France
| | - S Dreger
- Leibniz - Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Research Focus Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - R Schindel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Albrecht
- Institut für Radiologie und Interventionelle Therapie, Vivantes, Klinikum Neukölln, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Asmussen
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Zentralinstitut für Bildgebende Diagnostik, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
| | - J D Berthold
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - A Chavan
- Institut für Diagnostische & Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH, 26133, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - C Claussen
- Abt. für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Forsting
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - E A L Gianicolo
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - K Jablonka
- Klinik für Radiologische Diagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, 28177, Bremen, Germany
| | - A Jahnen
- Centre de Recherche Public Henri Tudor, 1855, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - M Langer
- Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Laniado
- Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - J Lotz
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - H J Mentzel
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Sektion Kinderradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07740, Jena, Germany
| | - A Queißer-Wahrendorf
- Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - O Rompel
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - I Schlick
- Institut für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, 90471, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - K Schneider
- Klinikum der Universität München, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - M Schumacher
- Klinik für Neuroradiologie, Neurozentrum, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, 78106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Seidenbusch
- Klinikum der Universität München, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - C Spix
- German Childhood Cancer Registry, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - B Spors
- Kinderradiologie, Standort Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - G Staatz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Sektion Kinderradiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J Wagner
- Institut für Radiologie und Interventionelle Therapie, Vivantes, Klinikum im Friedrichshain, 10249, Berlin, Germany
| | - G Weisser
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - H Zeeb
- Leibniz - Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Research Focus Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - M Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Straße 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Several radiation-related professional societies have concluded that carcinogenic risks associated with doses below 50-100 mSv are either too small to be detected, or are nonexistent. This is especially important in the context of doses from medical imaging. Radiation exposure to the public from medical imaging procedures is rising around the world, primarily due to increased utilization of computed tomography. Professional societies and advisory bodies consistently recommend against multiplying small doses by large populations to predict excess radiation-induced cancers, in large part because of the potential for sensational claims of health impacts which do not adequately take the associated uncertainties into account. Nonetheless, numerous articles have predicted thousands of future cancers as a result of CT scanning, and this has generated considerable concern among patients and parents. In addition, some authors claim that we now have direct epidemiological evidence of carcinogenic risks from medical imaging. This paper critically examines such claims, and concludes that the evidence cited does not provide direct evidence of low-dose carcinogenicity. These claims themselves have adverse public health impacts by frightening the public away from medically justified exams. It is time for the medical and scientific communities to be more assertive in responding to sensational claims of health risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brant A. Ulsh
- Principal Health Physicist, M.H. Chew & Associates, Livermore, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegel DA, King J, Tai E, Buchanan N, Ajani UA, Li J. Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001-2009. Pediatrics 2014; 134:e945-55. [PMID: 25201796 PMCID: PMC4536809 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cancer continues to be the leading disease-related cause of death among children and adolescents in the United States. More current information is needed to describe recent cancer trends and identify demographic and geographic variations. METHODS We analyzed data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results statewide registries representing 94.2% of the US population to identify cancers diagnosed among persons aged 0 to 19 years during 2001-2009. Age-adjusted rates and annual percentage change for trends were calculated. Data were stratified by age, gender, race, ethnicity, and geography. RESULTS We identified 120,137 childhood and adolescent cancer cases during 2001-2009 with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 171.01 per million. The overall rate of all cancers combined remained stable over time (annual percent change [APC], 0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 0.7). There was an increase in the overall cancer trend among African American children and adolescents (APC, 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5). An increasing trend for thyroid cancer was observed among both genders (APC, 4.9%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 6.6) and specifically among adolescents and those in the Northeast, South, and West regions of the United States. Renal carcinoma incidence was increasing significantly overall (APC, 5.4%; 95% CI, 2.8 to 8.1). Extracranial and extragonadal germ cell tumors and melanoma were both significantly decreasing. CONCLUSIONS This study reports the novel finding that renal carcinoma rates are increasing among children and adolescents. This study confirms that thyroid cancer rates are increasing and further describes rising cancer rates among African Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Siegel
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Eric Tai
- Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch
| | - Natasha Buchanan
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
| | - Umed A. Ajani
- Offices of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (OSELS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jun Li
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
White IK, Shaikh KA, Moore RJ, Bullis CL, Sami MT, Gianaris TJ, Fulkerson DH. Risk of radiation-induced malignancies from CT scanning in children who underwent shunt treatment before 6 years of age: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 13:514-9. [PMID: 24628509 DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.peds12508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT A number of mathematical models predict the risk of future cancer from the ionizing radiation exposure of CT scanning. The predictions are alarming. Some models predict 29,000 future cancers and 14,500 deaths in the US will be directly caused by 1 year's worth of CT scanning. However, there are very few clinical data to justify or refute these claims. Young children are theoretically highly susceptible to the damaging effects of radiation. In this study, the authors examined children who underwent CSF shunt placement before 6 years of age. The authors chose to study shunt-treated patients with the assumption that these patients would undergo future imaging, facilitating surveillance. They chose a study period of 1991-2001 to allow more than 10 years of follow-up data. METHODS The authors studied 104 consecutive children who underwent CSF shunt placement prior to 6 years of age and who had at least 10 years of follow-up data. Sixty-two of these patients underwent shunt placement prior to 1 year of age. The age at the initial scanning session, the number of future CT scanning sessions, diagnosis, and results of any future studies were recorded. The age-specific radiation dose was calculated for children younger than 1 year. Children younger than 1 year at the time of shunt placement were evaluated separately, based on the assumption that they represented the highest risk cohort. The authors examined all data for any evidence of future leukemia or head/neck tumor (benign or malignant). RESULTS These children underwent a total of 1584 CT scanning sessions over a follow-up period of 1622 person-years. A total of 517 scanning sessions were performed prior to 6 years of age, including 260 in the 1st year of life. Children who underwent shunt placement before 1 year of age underwent an average of 16.3 ± 13.5 CT sessions (range 1-41). Children undergoing placement between 1 and 6 years of age received an average of 14.1 ± 12.5 CT studies (range 5-52). There were no subsequent tumors (benign or malignant) or leukemia detected. CONCLUSIONS Previously published models predict a significant number of future cancers directly caused by CT scanning. However, there are very few published clinical data. In the authors' study, zero future radiation-induced malignancies were detected after routine CT scanning in a high-risk group. While the authors do not consider their single-institution study adequate to define the actual risk, their data suggest that the overall risk is low. The authors hope this study encourages future collaborative efforts to define the actual risk to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian K White
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine; and
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Journy N, Ancelet S, Rehel JL, Mezzarobba M, Aubert B, Laurier D, Bernier MO. Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2014; 53:39-54. [PMID: 24105448 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0491-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2013] [Accepted: 09/08/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The potential adverse effects associated with exposure to ionizing radiation from computed tomography (CT) in pediatrics must be characterized in relation to their expected clinical benefits. Additional epidemiological data are, however, still awaited for providing a lifelong overview of potential cancer risks. This paper gives predictions of potential lifetime risks of cancer incidence that would be induced by CT examinations during childhood in French routine practices in pediatrics. Organ doses were estimated from standard radiological protocols in 15 hospitals. Excess risks of leukemia, brain/central nervous system, breast and thyroid cancers were predicted from dose-response models estimated in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors' dataset and studies of medical exposures. Uncertainty in predictions was quantified using Monte Carlo simulations. This approach predicts that 100,000 skull/brain scans in 5-year-old children would result in eight (90 % uncertainty interval (UI) 1-55) brain/CNS cancers and four (90 % UI 1-14) cases of leukemia and that 100,000 chest scans would lead to 31 (90 % UI 9-101) thyroid cancers, 55 (90 % UI 20-158) breast cancers, and one (90 % UI <0.1-4) leukemia case (all in excess of risks without exposure). Compared to background risks, radiation-induced risks would be low for individuals throughout life, but relative risks would be highest in the first decades of life. Heterogeneity in the radiological protocols across the hospitals implies that 5-10 % of CT examinations would be related to risks 1.4-3.6 times higher than those for the median doses. Overall excess relative risks in exposed populations would be 1-10 % depending on the site of cancer and the duration of follow-up. The results emphasize the potential risks of cancer specifically from standard CT examinations in pediatrics and underline the necessity of optimization of radiological protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neige Journy
- Laboratory of Epidemiology, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Childhood and parental diagnostic radiological procedures and risk of childhood brain tumors. Cancer Causes Control 2014; 25:375-83. [DOI: 10.1007/s10552-014-0338-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2013] [Accepted: 01/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
24
|
Wakeford R. The risk of childhood leukaemia following exposure to ionising radiation--a review. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2013; 33:1-25. [PMID: 23296257 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/33/1/1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Since the early years of follow-up of the Japanese atomic-bomb survivors, it has been apparent that childhood leukaemia has a particular sensitivity to induction by ionising radiation, the excess relative risk (ERR) being expressed as a temporal wave with time since exposure. This pattern has been generally confirmed by studies of children treated with radiotherapy. Case-control studies of childhood leukaemia and antenatal exposure to diagnostic x-rays, a recent large cohort study of leukaemia following CT examinations of young people, and a recent large case-control study of natural background γ-radiation and childhood leukaemia have found evidence of raised risks following low-level exposure. These findings indicate that an ERR/Sv for childhood leukaemia of ~50, which may be derived from risk models based upon the Japanese atomic-bomb survivors, is broadly applicable to low dose or low dose-rate exposure circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wakeford
- Dalton Nuclear Institute, The University of Manchester, Pariser Building-G Floor, Sackville Street, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bernier MO, Mezzarobba M, Maupu E, Caër-Lorho S, Brisse HJ, Laurier D, Brunelle F, Chatellier G. [Role of French hospital claims databases from care units in epidemiological studies: the example of the "Cohorte Enfant Scanner" study]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2012; 60:363-70. [PMID: 22981307 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2011] [Revised: 01/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "Cohorte Enfant Scanner", a study designed to investigate the risk of radiation-induced cancer after childhood exposure to CT (computed tomography) examinations, used clinical information contained in the "programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information" (PMSI) database, the French hospital activities national program based upon diagnosis related groups (DRG). However, the quality and adequacy of the data for the specific needs of the study should be verified. The aim of our work was to estimate the percentage of the cohort's children identified in the PMSI database and to develop an algorithm to individualize the children with a cancer or a disease at risk of cancer from medical diagnoses provided by the DRGs database. METHODS Of the 1519 children from the "Cohorte Enfant Scanner", who had had a CT scan in the radiology department of a university hospital in 2002, a cross linkage was performed with the DRGs database. All hospitalizations over the period 2002-2009 were taken into account. An algorithm was constructed for the items "cancer" and "disease at risk for cancer" on a sample of 150 children. The algorithm was then tested on the entire population. RESULTS Overall, 74% of our population was identified in the DRGs database. The algorithm individualized cancer diagnoses with 91% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 86%; 97%) and 98% specificity (95%CI: 97%; 99%) and 86% positive predictive value (95%CI: 80%; 93%). For the diagnosis of disease at risk for cancer, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were respectively 91% (95%CI: 84%; 98%), 94% (95%CI: 92%; 95%) and 52% (95%CI: 43%; 61%). CONCLUSION The DRG database identified with excellent sensitivity and specificity children with diagnoses of cancer or disease at risk for cancer. Hence, potential confounding factors related to the disease of the child can be taken into account for analyses performed with the cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-O Bernier
- Laboratoire d'épidémiologie, institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krille L, Zeeb H, Jahnen A, Mildenberger P, Seidenbusch M, Schneider K, Weisser G, Hammer G, Scholz P, Blettner M. Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2012; 51:103-111. [PMID: 22310909 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-012-0405-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2011] [Accepted: 01/22/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Radiation protection is a topic of great public concern and of many scientific investigations, because ionizing radiation is an established risk factor for leukaemia and many solid tumours. Exposure of the public to ionizing radiation includes exposure to background radiation, as well as medical and occupational exposures. A large fraction of the exposure from diagnostic procedures comes from medical imaging. Computed tomography (CT) is the major single contributor of diagnostic radiation exposure. An increase in the use of CTs has been reported over the last decades in many countries. Children have smaller bodies and lower shielding capacities, factors that affect the individual organ doses due to medical imaging. Several risk models have been applied to estimate the cancer burden caused by ionizing radiation from CT. All models predict higher risks for cancer among children exposed to CT as compared to adults. However, the cancer risk associated with CT has not been assessed directly in epidemiological studies. Here, plans are described to conduct an historical cohort study to investigate the cancer incidence in paediatric patients exposed to CT before the age of 15 in Germany. Patients will be recruited from radiology departments of several hospitals. Their individual exposure will be recorded, and time-dependent cumulative organ doses will be calculated. Follow-up for cancer incidence via the German Childhood Cancer Registry will allow computation of standardized incidence ratios using population-based incidence rates for childhood cancer. Dose-response modelling and analyses for subgroups of children based on the indication for and the result of the CT will be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Krille
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik (IMBEI), Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Baysson H, Etard C, Brisse HJ, Bernier MO. [Diagnostic radiation exposure in children and cancer risk: current knowledge and perspectives]. Arch Pediatr 2011; 19:64-73. [PMID: 22130615 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2011.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2011] [Revised: 08/30/2011] [Accepted: 10/21/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
The question of the risk of cancer associated with postnatal diagnostic medical exposure involving ionizing radiation in childhood is particularly relevant at the moment given the growing use of diagnostic examinations, especially computed tomography scans, in children. Compared to adults, pediatric patients are more sensitive to radiation and have more years of life expectancy and therefore more years at risk of cancer occurrence as compared to adults. This paper provides a description of diagnostic x-ray exposure in children in France and summarizes epidemiologic studies on subsequent risk of cancer. Overall, this review, based on 12 case-control studies and 6 cohort studies, shows no significant association between exposure to medical diagnostic radiation exposure and childhood cancer risk. The methodological limitations of these studies are discussed. As the expected cancer risks are low, epidemiological studies require very large sample sizes and long periods of follow-up in addition to a good dosimetry assessment to enable quantitative risk estimation. New cohort studies of young patients who underwent CT scans are currently underway within the European EPI-CT project. In the meantime, continued efforts to reduce doses and the number of radiological examinations in children are needed, including adhering to the "as long as reasonably achievable" (Alara) principle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Baysson
- IRSN, DRPH, SER, laboratoire d'épidémiologie, BP17, 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses cedex, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors exposed as children. Environ Health Prev Med 2011; 17:228-34. [PMID: 22038340 DOI: 10.1007/s12199-011-0246-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2010] [Accepted: 10/03/2011] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare cancer mortality among A-bomb survivors exposed as children with cancer mortality among an unexposed control group (the entire population of Japan, JPCG). METHODS The subjects were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki A-bomb survivor groups (0-14 years of age in 1945) reported in life span study report 12 (follow-up years were from 1950 to 1990), and a control group consisting of the JPCG. We estimated the expected number of deaths due to all causes and cancers of various causes among the exposed survivors who died in the follow-up interval, if they had died with the same mortality as the JPCG (0-14 years of age in 1945). We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of A-bomb survivors in comparison with the JPCG. RESULTS SMRs were significantly higher in exposed boys overall for all deaths, all cancers, leukemia, and liver cancer, and for exposed girls overall for all cancers, solid cancers, liver cancer, and breast cancer. In boys, SMRs were significantly higher for all deaths and liver cancer even in those exposed to very low doses, and for all cancers, solid cancers, and liver cancer in those exposed to low doses. In girls, SMRs were significantly higher for liver cancer and uterine cancer in those exposed to low doses, and for leukemia, solid cancers, stomach cancer, and breast cancer in those exposed to high doses. CONCLUSIONS We calculated the SMRs for the A-bomb survivors versus JPCG in childhood and compared them with a true non-exposed group. A notable result was that SMRs in boys exposed to low doses were significantly higher for solid cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Childhood cancer risk from conventional radiographic examinations for selected referral criteria: results from a large cohort study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:217-23. [PMID: 21701033 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.4979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about the long-term effects of exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation in childhood. Current estimates are made with models derived mainly from studies of atomic bomb survivors, a population that differs from today's patients in many respects. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the cancer incidence among children who underwent diagnostic x-ray exposures between 1976 and 2003 in a large German university hospital. We reconstructed individual radiation doses for each examination and sorted results by groups of referral criteria for all cancers combined, solid tumors, and leukemia and lymphoma combined. RESULTS A total of 68 incidence cancer cases between 1980 and 2006 were identified in a 78,527-patient cohort in the German childhood cancer registry: 28 leukemia, nine lymphoma, six tumors of the CNS, and 25 other tumors. The standardized incidence ratio for all cancers was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.75-1.23). Dose-response relations were analyzed by multivariable Poisson regression. Although the cancer incidence risk differed by initial referral criterion for radiographic examination, a positive dose-response relation was observed in five patients with endocrine or metabolic disease. CONCLUSION Overall, we observed no increase in cancer risk among children and youths with very low radiation doses from diagnostic radiation, which is compatible with model calculations. The growing use of CT warrants further studies to assess associated cancer risk. Our work is an early contribution of epidemiologic data for quantifying these risks among young patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Krille L, Jahnen A, Mildenberger P, Schneider K, Weisser G, Zeeb H, Blettner M. Computed tomography in children: multicenter cohort study design for the evaluation of cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 2011; 26:249-50. [PMID: 21318426 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-011-9549-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2010] [Accepted: 01/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known risk factor for cancer. Cancer risk is highest after exposure in childhood. The computed tomography is the major contributor to the average, individual radiation exposure. Until now the association has been addressed only in statistical modeling. We present the first feasible study design on childhood cancer risk after exposure to computed tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Krille
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Street 69, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Computed tomographic analysis of outer calvarial thickness for osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing system insertion. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32:448-52. [PMID: 21206390 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318206fdc0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) are a useful tool in auditory rehabilitation for single-sided deafness and conductive/mixed hearing loss. They rely on adequate osseointegration of titanium implants, which can be limited by calvarial thickness. This study examines adult computed tomographic (CT) temporal bone normative data for calvarial thickness in the areas commonly recommended for BAHS insertion and identifies hazards that may compromise the osseointegration process. METHODS Prospective analysis of 100 consecutive adult helical CT scans. Calvarial thickness was measured in axial and coronal planes 5.5 cm posterior to the superior external auditory canal at 6 vertical points (EAC, +1 cm, +2 cm, +3 cm, +4 cm, and +5 cm). Other parameters measured include temporal bone pneumatization and the presence of suture lines, bone marrow, and vascular structures. RESULTS A total of 195 temporal bones were examined in 100 patients. Mean patient age was 60.9 years, of whom 54.4% were men and 45.6% were women. Mean calvarial thickness was greatest at +1 cm above the EAC level (6.3 mm) and thinnest at +4 cm (5.1 mm). Of temporal bones, 55% had at least 1 site thinner than 4 mm and 21% had at least 1 site thinner than 3 mm. Air cells and suture lines were more likely to be encountered within 2 cm above the EAC level, and marrow space is more likely to be encountered 3 to 4 cm above the EAC level. DISCUSSION Selecting a position 3 to 4 cm above the level of the EAC is more likely to result in dural exposure for a 3-mm BAHS abutment, especially in men. Selecting a position near the level of the EAC provides thicker bone, but the surgeon is more likely to encounter suture line or enter mastoid air cells. Preoperative CT imaging may be a useful tool in evaluating calvarial thickness and hazards when planning BAHS insertion in the adult population.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gajski G, Milković D, Ranogajec-Komor M, Miljanić S, Garaj-Vrhovac V. Application of dosimetry systems and cytogenetic status of the child population exposed to diagnostic X-rays by use of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. J Appl Toxicol 2010; 31:608-17. [PMID: 21089162 DOI: 10.1002/jat.1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2010] [Revised: 09/06/2010] [Accepted: 09/07/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Low-dose ionizing radiation used for medical purposes is one of the definite risk factors for cancer development, and children exposed to ionizing radiation are at a relatively greater cancer risk as they have more rapidly dividing cells than adults and have longer life expectancy. Since cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMN Cyt) assay has become one of the standard endpoints for radiation biological dosimetry, we used that assay in the present work for the assessment of different types of chromosomal damage in children exposed to diagnostic X-ray procedures. Twenty children all with pulmonary diseases between the ages of 4 and 14 years (11.30 ± 2.74) were evaluated. Absorbed dose measurements were conducted for posterior-anterior projection on the forehead, thyroid gland, gonads, chest and back. Doses were measured using thermoluminescence and radiophotoluminescent dosimetry systems. It was shown that, after diagnostic X-rays, the mean total number of CBMN Cyt assay parameters (micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds) was significantly higher than prior to diagnostic procedure and that interindividual differences existed for each monitored child. For the nuclear division index counted prior and after examination, no significant differences were noted among mean group values. These data suggest that even low-dose diagnostic X-ray exposure may induce damaging effect in the somatic DNA of exposed children, indicating that immense care should be given in both minimizing and optimizing radiation exposure to diminish the radiation burden, especially in the youngest population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goran Gajski
- Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Mutagenesis Unit, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bartley K, Metayer C, Selvin S, Ducore J, Buffler P. Diagnostic X-rays and risk of childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39:1628-37. [PMID: 20889538 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between diagnostic X-ray exposures early in life and increased risk of childhood leukaemia remains unclear. METHODS This case-control study included children aged 0-14 years diagnosed with acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL, n = 711) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML, n = 116) from 1995 to 2008. Controls were randomly selected from the California birth registry and individually matched to cases with respect to date of birth, sex, Hispanic ethnicity and maternal race. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether ALL or AML was associated with self-reported child's X-rays after birth (post-natal), including number of X-rays, region of the body X-rayed and age at first X-ray, as well as maternal X-rays before and during pregnancy (preconception and prenatal). RESULTS After excluding X-rays in the year prior to diagnosis (reference date for matched controls), risk of ALL was elevated in children exposed to three or more post-natal X-rays [odds ratio (OR) = 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.79]. For B-cell ALL specifically, any exposure (one or more X-rays) conferred increased risk (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.86). Region of the body exposed was not an independent risk factor in multivariable analyses. No associations were observed between number of post-natal X-rays and AML (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22) or T-cell ALL (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.59-1.19). Prevalence of exposure to prenatal and preconception X-rays was low, and no associations with ALL or AML were observed. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that exposure to post-natal diagnostic X-rays is associated with increased risk of childhood ALL, specifically B-cell ALL, but not AML or T-cell ALL. Given the imprecise measures of self-reported X-ray exposure, the results of this analysis should be interpreted with caution and warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bartley
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bailey HD, Armstrong BK, de Klerk NH, Fritschi L, Attia J, Lockwood L, Milne E. Exposure to Diagnostic Radiological Procedures and the Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:2897-909. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
35
|
Khan S, Evans AA, Rorke-Adams L, Orjuela MA, Shiminski-Maher T, Bunin GR. Head injury, diagnostic X-rays, and risk of medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor: a Children's Oncology Group study. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21:1017-23. [PMID: 20217209 PMCID: PMC3023159 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9529-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2009] [Accepted: 02/18/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A comprehensive case-control study was conducted to determine potential risk factors for medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), a common brain tumor in children. This analysis evaluated possible associations between previous head injury and ionizing radiation exposure through diagnostic X-rays and medulloblastoma/PNET. METHODS Mothers of 318 cases <6 years of age at diagnosis between 1991 and 1997 and registered with the Children's Oncology Group were interviewed. Mothers of 318 matching controls were selected through random digit dialing and interviewed. RESULTS An association was not detected between previous head injury (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.5) or head X-ray for any reason including head injury with medulloblastoma/PNET. A statistically non-significant excess of cases reported having an X-ray for reason other than head injury (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.91-5.7). When cases that received an X-ray for a common symptom of medulloblastoma/PNET were considered unexposed this association weakened (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.49-3.7). No dose-response relationship was observed. CONCLUSIONS Head injury and exposure to diagnostic head X-rays were not associated with medulloblastoma/PNET in this study. Future studies should investigate all imaging procedures with ionizing radiation exposure including computed tomography scans and utilize radiation dose estimations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saira Khan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Milkovic D, Garaj-Vrhovac V, Ranogajec-Komor M, Miljanic S, Gajski G, Knezevic Z, Beck N. Primary DNA damage assessed with the comet assay and comparison to the absorbed dose of diagnostic X-rays in children. Int J Toxicol 2010; 28:405-16. [PMID: 19815846 DOI: 10.1177/1091581809344775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this work is to assess DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of children prior to and following airway X-ray examinations of the chest using the alkaline comet assay and to compare data with the measured absorbed dose. Twenty children with pulmonary diseases, between the ages of 5 and 14 years, are assessed. Absorbed dose measurements are conducted for posterior-anterior projection on the forehead, thyroid gland, gonads, chest, and back. Doses are measured using thermoluminescent and radiophotoluminescent dosimetry systems. Differences between tail lengths, tail intensity, and tail moments as well as for the long-tailed nuclei before and after exposures are statistically significant and are dependent on the individual. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the comet assay as a measure of X-ray damage to lymphocytes in a clinical setting. Doses measured with both dosimeters show satisfactory agreement (0.01 mSv) and are suitable for dosimetric measurements in X-ray diagnostics.
Collapse
|