1
|
Dos Reis D, Fraticelli L, Bassand A, Manzo-Silberman S, Peschanski N, Charpentier S, Elbaz M, Savary D, Bonnefoy-Cudraz E, Laribi S, Henry P, Guerraoui A, Tazarourte K, Chouihed T, El Khoury C. Impact of renal dysfunction on the management and outcome of acute heart failure: results from the French prospective, multicentre, DeFSSICA survey. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e022776. [PMID: 30782685 PMCID: PMC6340446 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is the combination of acute heart failure syndrome (AHF) and renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤60 mL/min). Real-life data were used to compare the management and outcome of AHF with and without renal dysfunction. DESIGN Prospective, multicentre. SETTING Twenty-six academic, community and regional hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS 507 patients with AHF were assessed in two groups according to renal function: group 1 (patients with CRS (CrCl ≤60 mL/min): n=335) and group 2 (patients with AHF with normal renal function (CrCl >60 mL/min): n=172). RESULTS Differences were observed (group 1 vs group 2) at admission for the incidence of chronic heart failure (56.42% vs 47.67%), use of furosemide (60.9% vs 52.91%), insulin (15.52% vs 9.3%) and amiodarone (14.33% vs 4.65%); additionally, more patients in group 1 carried a defibrillator (4.78% vs 0%), had ≥2 hospitalisations in the last year (15.52% vs 5.81%) and were under the care of a cardiologist (72.24% vs 61.63%). Clinical signs were broadly similar in each group. Brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and BNP prohormone were higher in group 1 than group 2 (1157.5 vs 534 ng/L and 5120 vs 2513 ng/mL), and more patients in group 1 were positive for troponin (58.2% vs 44.19%), had cardiomegaly (51.04% vs 37.21%) and interstitial opacities (60.3% vs 47.67%). The only difference in emergency treatment was the use of nitrates, (higher in group 1 (21.9% vs 12.21%)). In-hospital mortality and the percentage of patients still hospitalised after 30 days were similar between groups, but the median stay was longer in group 1 (8 days vs 6 days). CONCLUSIONS Renal impairment in AHF should not limit the use of loop diuretics and/or vasodilators, but early assessment of pulmonary congestion and close monitoring of the efficacy of conventional therapies is encouraged to allow rapid and appropriate implementation of alternative therapies if necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Adrien Bassand
- SAMU-SMUR-SAU Nancy, Hôpital Central, Nancy, Lorraine, France
| | | | | | - Sandrine Charpentier
- Emergency Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- INSERM, U1027, Toulouse, France
- Medical Department, Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Meyer Elbaz
- Department of Cardiology, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Dominique Savary
- Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit, Metz-Tessy, France
| | | | - Said Laribi
- Emergency Medicine Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
- INSERM UMR-S 942, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Henry
- Lariboisière Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - Karim Tazarourte
- Emergency Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Tahar Chouihed
- SAMU-SMUR-SAU Nancy, Hôpital Central, Nancy, Lorraine, France
- Centre d’Investigation Clinique Plurithématique 1433, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Carlos El Khoury
- Emergency Department and RESCUe Network, Lucien Hussel Hospital, Vienne, France
- University Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, HESPER EA, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|