A Comparison of US Medicare Expenditures for Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Neighborhood Built Environment and Home Dialysis Utilization: Varying Patterns by Urbanicity-Dependent Patterns and Implications for Policy

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Despite national efforts, the uptake of home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis) remains low. Characteristics of the built environment may differentially impact home dialysis use.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study (2010-2019).

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

1,103,695 adults (aged≥18 years) initiating dialysis in the US Renal Data System.

EXPOSURE

We examined 3 built environment domains based on residential ZIP code: (1) medically underserved areas (MUAs), defined as neighborhoods with limited primary care access; (2) distance to the nearest dialysis facility; and (3) distribution of housing characteristics (structure and overcrowding).

OUTCOME

Uptake of home dialysis modalities at dialysis initiation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

We quantified associations between built environment characteristics and home dialysis initiation using multilevel logistic regression stratified by urbanicity type (urban, suburban, small-town, and rural).

RESULTS

Among adults initiating dialysis, 40.8% lived in MUAs. Across ZIP codes, the mean percentage of overcrowded housing was 4.2% (SD, 4.7%), and the percentage of detached housing was 61.1% (SD, 21.1%); mean distance to the nearest dialysis facility was 5.5km (SD, 9.1km). Living in MUAs was associated with reduced home dialysis use only in urban (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96) and suburban (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94) areas. Similarly, housing overcrowding was associated with decreased home dialysis use only in urban (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89) and suburban (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93) areas. Longer distance to a dialysis facility was the most salient neighborhood factor associated with increased home dialysis use in small towns (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.16) and rural areas (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.19).

LIMITATIONS

Housing characteristics were measured at the ZIP code level.

CONCLUSIONS

Built environment characteristics associated with home dialysis uptake vary by urbanicity. Policies should address built environment barriers that are specific to urbanicity level. For example, increasing the frequency of dialysate delivery schedules could address housing space constraints in urban and suburban areas, and promoting home dialysis might be more effective for patients living far from dialysis centers in small-town and rural areas.

Timing of parathyroidectomy after kidney transplantation: A cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION

Parathyroidectomy is the definitive treatment for tertiary hyperparathyroidism post-kidney transplantation. However, cinacalcet-based medical management is increasingly used as an alternative. The financial consequences of each treatment remain unclear. We aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for managing hyperparathyroidism from the kidney transplantation recipient's perspective.

METHODS

We constructed a patient-level discrete event simulation model to compare parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet-based medical management. The effects of hyperparathyroidism on allograft survival and all-cause mortality were considered in the discrete event simulation model with a time horizon of 15 years. Our base case was a 55-year-old kidney transplantation recipient with persistent hyperparathyroidism and hypercalcemia. The primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness measured by cost per quality-adjusted life years.

RESULTS

The monthly out-of-pocket cost of cinacalcet ranged from $12 to $288, depending on insurance coverage, with a base case cost of $150. Our base case analysis showed that parathyroidectomy was the dominant treatment with lesser cost ($1,315 vs $7,147) and greater effectiveness (3.17 quality-adjusted life years and 2.92 quality-adjusted life years) than cinacalcet. One-way sensitivity analysis on the cinacalcet treatment duration showed that parathyroidectomy became more cost-effective at 9 months. Two-way sensitivity analysis on the cost of cinacalcet and the duration of treatment with cinacalcet showed that as the monthly cost of cinacalcet increases, the expense of cinacalcet-based medical management quickly exceeds the cost of parathyroidectomy.

CONCLUSION

Parathyroidectomy becomes more cost-effective for kidney transplantation recipients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism when they require cinacalcet-based medical management for more than 9 months. As part of shared decision-making, it is important to discuss the financial costs involved in treating tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

How Much Will a Pig Organ Transplant Cost? A Preliminary Estimate of the Cost of Xenotransplantation Versus Allotransplantation in the USA

We reviewed the costs of organ allotransplantation and attempted to estimate the potential costs of xenotransplantation (based on the premise that, when clinically established, the results of pig organ xenotransplantation would be at least equal to those of allotransplantation). The care of patients with end-stage organ failure waiting for an allograft is expensive, particularly if chronic dialysis or mechanical support is required. Xenotransplantation has the potential to eliminate wait times for organ transplants, significantly reduce certain management costs, for example, chronic dialysis, and enable early transplantation before comorbidities develop or increase. The cost of the surgical procurement of a pig organ and its transplantation will be similar to that of allotransplantation, as will the cost of immunosuppressive therapy. The major "unknown" is the cost of purchasing a gene-edited pig organ, which is likely to be considerable. We conclude that there will be significant cost savings for the pretransplant care of an individual patient, but these may be offset by the cost of the gene-edited pig organ. However, the ready availability of an unlimited organ supply will greatly increase the number of transplants carried out each year, thus increasing the overall expenditure on transplantation.

Early Kidney Transplantation or Conversion to Peritoneal Dialysis after First-Time Arteriovenous Access Creation

BACKGROUND

After autogenous arteriovenous (AV) access creation for end-stage renal disease, a majority of patients will continue on hemodialysis (HD), a minority will receive definitive treatment with kidney transplantation, and a subset of patients will convert to peritoneal dialysis (PD). Our goal was to identify patient factors associated with early transition from HD to either kidney transplantation or PD.

METHODS

This is a case-control study of all patients with first-time AV access creation in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2022) who had long-term follow-up. Patients who remained on HD after AV access creation were the control group while patients who received early kidney transplant or who converted to PD were the 2 case groups. Relationship among demographics, comorbidities, neighborhood social disadvantage, and functional status as they relate to renal replacement therapy modality was assessed.

RESULTS

There were 19,782 patients included; the average age was 62 ± 15 years and 57% were male. During the follow-up period of a median 306 (71-403) days, 1.3% underwent a kidney transplantation and 2.3% underwent conversion to PD. On univariable analysis, rates of kidney transplantation or conversion to PD varied with race (P < 0.001), insurance status (P < 0.001), area deprivation index (ADI) quintile (P < 0.001), and several medical comorbidities. On multivariable analysis, impaired ambulation, current smoking, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, Black race, heart failure, body mass index, and older age were associated with decreased transplantation rates. Conversion to PD was associated with ADI Q5, Q4, and Q3. Decreased conversion to PD was associated with impaired ambulation, Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, former smoking, medication-controlled diabetes, and older age.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased kidney transplantation was associated with Black race and noncommercial health insurance but not ADI quintile, suggesting disparities exist beyond community-level access to care. Early kidney transplantation conveyed a 3-year survival benefit compared with HD and PD, which had similar survival. Furthermore work is required to increase access to kidney transplantation and PD.

Navigating the Global Economic Landscape of Dialysis: A Summary of Expert Opinions from The 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to be a significant global public health issue. The escalating burden of CKD is probably driven by the aging population and the rising prevalence of diabetes. CKD not only adversely impacts an individual's health and well-being, but also poses significant challenge on the economy of the society.

Summary

Experts from ten countries and regions around the world (Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) convened in the 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists on December 1, 2023 to discuss the global dialysis burden. Although the cost of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) accounts for 2-3% of total healthcare expenditure in developed countries, patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) only represent a small percentage (<0.5%) of the population. Importantly, the economic impact of ESKD is not limited to direct medical costs, but extends to indirect societal costs, such as productivity loss by patients and caregivers. Primary prevention of CKD, early screening and treatment to delay progression to ESKD (where treatment costs rise dramatically), and utilization of home-based dialysis therapy (including peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) shall be implemented as part of cost-containment strategy. Kidney transplant provides better outcomes than dialysis and is cost-effective in long run, whereas conservative kidney management should be considered for elderly frail patients.

Key Messages

Implementation of preventive measures and cost-effective treatment strategies are the cornerstone to combat the global CKD epidemic.

Comparative Outcomes of Peritoneal and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients with STEMI: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis (2016-2020)

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are at increased risk of mortality, particularly due to cardiovascular events such as acute myocardial infarction. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are the two main treatment modalities for ESRD patients. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we conducted a retrospective study involving 25,435 ESRD patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2016 and 2020, categorized by their dialysis regimen. Our analysis revealed comparable mortality rates between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients, but lower hospitalization costs and fewer complications among PD recipients. Over five years, we observed a notable decrease in STEMI mortality despite increased STEMI cases among HD patients. Conversely, HD patients experienced increased hospital stays and associated costs over the study period than PD patients, who demonstrated stable trends. This study highlights the implications of dialysis modality selection in managing costs and reducing morbidity among STEMI patients with ESRD.

Exploring kidney dialysis costs in the United States: a scoping review

AIMS

The increasing prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States (US) represents a considerable economic burden due to the high cost of dialysis treatment. This review examines data from real-world studies to identify cost drivers and explore areas where dialysis costs could be reduced.

METHODS

We identified and synthesized evidence published from 2016-2023 reporting direct dialysis costs in adult US patients from a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and grey literature sources (e.g. US Renal Data System reports).

RESULTS

Most identified data related to Medicare expenditures. Overall Medicare spending in 2020 was $29B for hemodialysis and $2.8B for peritoneal dialysis (PD). Dialysis costs accounted for almost 80% of total Medicare expenditures on ESRD beneficiaries. Private insurance payers consistently pay more for dialysis; for example, per person per month spending by private insurers on outpatient dialysis was estimated at $10,149 compared with Medicare spending of $3,364. Dialysis costs were higher in specific high-risk patient groups (e.g. type 2 diabetes, hepatitis C). Spending on hemodialysis was higher than on PD, but the gap in spending between PD and hemodialysis is closing. Vascular access costs accounted for a substantial proportion of dialysis costs.

LIMITATIONS

Insufficient detail in the identified studies, especially related to outpatient costs, limits opportunities to identify key drivers. Differences between the studies in methods of measuring dialysis costs make generalization of these results difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that prevention of or delay in progression to ESRD could have considerable cost savings for Medicare and private payers, particularly in patients with high-risk conditions such as type 2 diabetes. More efficient use of resources is needed, including low-cost medication, to improve clinical outcomes and lower overall costs, especially in high-risk groups. Widening access to PD where it is safe and appropriate may help to reduce dialysis costs.

System-Level Strategies to Improve Home Dialysis: Policy Levers and Quality Initiatives

Advocacy and policy change are powerful levers to improve quality of care and better support patients on home dialysis. While the kidney community increasingly recognizes the value of home dialysis as an option for patients who prioritize independence and flexibility, only a minority of patients dialyze at home in the United States. Complex system-level factors have restricted further growth in home dialysis modalities, including limited infrastructure, insufficient staff for patient education and training, patient-specific barriers, and suboptimal physician expertise. In this article, we outline trends in home dialysis use, review our evolving understanding of what constitutes high-quality care for the home dialysis population (as well as how this can be measured), and discuss policy and advocacy efforts that continue to shape the care of US patients and compare them with experiences in other countries. We conclude by discussing future directions for quality and advocacy efforts.

Home Dialysis in North America: The Current State

There is widespread interest in expanding the uptake of home dialysis in North America. Although kidney transplantation should be the preferred option in eligible patients, home hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) offer cost-effective options for KRT. In this review, the motivation for promoting home dialysis is presented, and the literature supporting it is critically reviewed. Randomized comparisons of home HD and PD with in-center HD have been challenging to conduct and provide only limited information. Nonrandomized studies are heterogeneous in their design and have often yielded conflicting results. They are prone to bias, and this must be carefully considered when evaluating this literature. Home modalities seem to have equivalent clinical outcomes and quality of life when compared with in-center HD. However, the cost of providing home therapies, particularly PD, is lower than conventional, in-center HD. Measures of home dialysis utilization, the philosophy behind their measurement, and important factors to consider when interpreting them are discussed. The importance of understanding measures of home dialysis utilization in the context of rates of kidney failure, the proportion of individuals who opt for conservative care, and rates of kidney transplantation is highlighted, and a framework for proposing targets is presented, using PD as an example.

Needs and Considerations for Standardization of Kidney Disease Education in Patients with Advanced CKD

Kidney health advocacy organizations and leaders in the nephrology community have repeatedly emphasized the need to increase home dialysis utilization in the United States. Limited awareness and understanding of options for the management of kidney failure among patients living with advanced CKD is a significant barrier to increasing the selection and use of home dialysis. Studies have shown that providing targeted comprehensive patient education before the onset of kidney failure can improve patients' awareness of kidney disease and substantially increase the informed utilization of home dialysis. Unfortunately, in the absence of validated evidence-based education protocols, outcomes associated with home dialysis use vary widely among published studies, potentially affecting the routine implementation and reporting of these services among patients with advanced CKD. This review provides pragmatic guidance on establishing effective patient-centered education programs to empower patients to make informed decisions about their KRT and, in turn, increase home dialysis use.

Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis Drug Expenditures: A Comparison Within the Private Insurance Market

Rationale and Objective

Recent initiatives aim to improve patient satisfaction and autonomy by increasing the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. However, limited knowledge is available about the costs of different dialysis modalities, particularly those incurred by private insurers. In this study, we compared the costs of injectable dialysis drugs (and their oral equivalents) paid by insurers between privately insured patients receiving hemodialysis and PD.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting and Participants

From a private insurance claims database, we identified patients who started receiving PD or in-center hemodialysis between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020.

Exposure

Patients started receiving PD.

Outcomes

Average annual injectable drug and aggregate expenditures and expenditure subcategories.

Analytical Approach

Patients who started receiving PD were propensity matched to similar patients who started receiving hemodialysis based on the year of dialysis initiation, patient demographics, health, geography, and comorbidities. Cost ratios (CRs) were estimated from generalized linear models.

Results

We matched 284 privately insured patients who started receiving PD 1:1 with patients started receiving in-center hemodialysis. The average annual injectable drug expenditures for hemodialysis were 2-fold higher (CR: 1.99; 95% CI, 1.62-2.44) than that for PD. Compared those receiving PD, patients receiving hemodialysis incurred significantly lower nondrug dialysis-related expenditures (0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94). The average annual expenditures for non-dialysis-dependent outpatient services were significantly higher among patients who underwent in-center hemodialysis (CR: 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.90). Although aggregate and inpatient hospitalization expenditures were higher for in-center hemodialysis, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Limitations

Small sample sizes may have restricted our ability to identify differences in some cost categories.

Conclusions

Compared with privately insured patients who started receiving PD, patients starting in-center hemodialysis incurred higher expenditures for injectable dialysis drugs, whereas differences in other expenditure categories varied. Recent increases in the use of PD may lead to reductions in injectable dialysis drug costs among privately insured patients.

Plain Language Summary

Recent initiatives aim to improve patient satisfaction and autonomy by increasing the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. However, limited knowledge is available about the costs of different dialysis modalities, particularly those incurred by private insurers. In this study, we compared the costs of injectable dialysis drugs (and their oral equivalents) provided by insurers between privately insured patients receiving hemodialysis and PD. We found that the average annual injectable drug expenditures for hemodialysis were 2.0-fold higher compared with those for PD. These findings suggest that the recent increase in the use of PD may lead to reductions in injectable dialysis drug costs among privately insured patients.

Hybrid Method for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion: A New Technique for Improved Outcomes and Reduced Costs

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a well-established treatment choice for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). While there are several methods for PD catheter insertion, they each have limitations. In this study, we present a new hybrid method for PD catheter insertion and compare it to the conventional laparoscopic method.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 171 patients who were undergoing their first PD catheter insertion, and a total of 20% of the enrolled patients had a past medical history of abdominal surgery. Out of these, 101 patients underwent the laparoscopic method and 70 underwent a new invented hybrid method. The study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes, incidence of early and late complications, hospital stay, and medical expenses between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no notable differences in basic demographic features and comorbid conditions between the two groups. The results of our data revealed that the hybrid group had a significantly shorter break-in period and did not require temporary hemodialysis. Additionally, length of hospital stay and medical costs were significantly lower in the hybrid group (all p < 0.05). The incidence of early complications was lower in the hybrid group, while the incidence of late complications was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the hybrid method of PD catheter insertion provides a safe and efficient alternative to the traditional laparoscopic method, enabling urgent-start PD and reducing hospital stays and medical expenses. Our findings support the use of the hybrid method as a new standard of care for ESKD patients undergoing PD catheter insertion.

Adipose and Plasma microRNAs miR-221 and 222 Associate with Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and New Onset Diabetes after Peritoneal Dialysis

BACKGROUND

The correlation between microRNA, obesity, and glycemic intolerance in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) is unknown. We aimed to measure the adipose and plasma miR-221 and -222 levels, and to evaluate their association with adiposity, glucose intolerance, and new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after the commencement of PD.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited incident adult PD patients. miR-221 and -222 were measured from adipose tissue and plasma obtained during PD catheter insertion. These patients were followed for 24 months, and the outcomes were changes in adiposity, insulin resistance, and NODM after PD.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-five patients were recruited. Patients with pre-existing DM had higher adipose miR-221 (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.9-fold, p = 0.02) and -222 (1.9 ± 2.0 vs. 1.2 ± 1.3-fold, p = 0.01). High adipose miR-221 and -222 levels were associated with a greater increase in waist circumference (miR-221: beta 1.82, 95% CI 0.57-3.07, p = 0.005; miR-222: beta 1.35, 95% CI 0.08-2.63, p = 0.038), Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA) index (miR-221: beta 8.16, 95% CI 2.80-13.53, p = 0.003; miR-222: beta 6.59, 95% CI 1.13-12.05, p = 0.018), and insulin requirements (miR-221: beta 0.05, 95% CI 0.006-0.09, p = 0.02; miR-222: beta 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.11, p = 0.002) after PD. The plasma miR-222 level predicted the onset of NODM (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.35-50.5, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

miR-221 and -222 are associated with the progression of obesity, insulin resistance, and NODM after PD.