The cost of treating osteoporosis in a managed health care organization

Osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review of U.S. healthcare costs and resource utilization

Osteoporotic fractures are costly in terms of both the dollar amount and healthcare utilization. The objective of this review was to systematically synthesize published evidence regarding direct costs associated with the treatment of osteoporosis-related fractures in the U.S. We conducted a systematic literature review of published studies that used claims databases and economic studies reporting costs associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in the U.S. Studies published between 1990 and 2011 were systematically searched in PubMed (primary source), Ovid HealthSTAR, EMBASE and the websites of large agencies. Data concerning study design, patient population and cost components assessed were extracted with qualitative assessment of study methods, limitations and conclusions. Cost assessment included direct medical and hospitalization (inpatient) costs. The cost differences by age and gender were examined. Of the 33 included studies, 26 reported an estimated total medical cost and hospital resource use associated with osteoporotic fractures. These studies indicated that, in the year following a fracture, medical and hospitalization costs were 1.6-6.2 higher than pre-fracture costs and 2.2-3.5 times higher than those for matched controls. Analysis of the hospitalization costs by osteoporotic fracture type resulted in hip fractures identified as the most expensive fracture type (unit cost range $US 8358-32195), while wrist and forearm fractures were the least expensive (unit cost range $US 1885-12136). Although incremental fracture costs were generally lower in the elderly than in the younger population, total costs were highest for the older (≥65 years of age) population. Total healthcare costs for fractures were highest for the older female population, but unit fracture costs in women were not consistently found to be higher than for men. The qualitative assessment of the included studies demonstrated that the design and reporting of individual studies were of good quality. However, the findings of this review and comparisons across studies were limited by differences in methodologies used by the different studies to derive costs, the populations included in the studies used and the fracture assessment. Despite the variability in estimates, the literature indicates that osteoporosis-related fractures are associated with high total medical and hospitalization costs in the U.S. The variability in the cost estimates highlights the importance of comparing the methodologies and the types of costs used when choosing an appropriate unit cost for economic modelling.

Medical costs of osteoporosis in the elderly Medicare population

Prior national cost estimates of osteoporosis and fractures in the USA have been based on diverse sets of provider data or selected commercial insurance claims. Based on a random population-based sample of older adults, the US medical cost of osteoporosis and fractures is estimated at $22 billion in 2008.

INTRODUCTION

National cost estimates of osteoporosis and fractures in the USA have been based on diverse sets of provider data or selected commercial insurance claims. We sought to characterize prevalence and costs for osteoporosis using a random population-based sample of older adults.

METHODS

A cross-sectional estimate of medical cost was made with 2002 data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). MCBS combines health interviews with claims information from all payers to profile a random sample of 12,700 Medicare recipients. Three cohorts aged 65 or over were defined: (1) patients experiencing a fracture-related claim in 2002; (2) patients with a diagnosis, medication, or self-report for osteoporosis or past hip fracture; and (3) non-case controls. The total cost of patient claims was compared to that of controls using multiple regression.

RESULTS

Of 30.2 million elderly Medicare recipients in 2002, 1.6 million (5%) were treated for a fracture that year, and an additional 7.2 million (24%) have osteoporosis without a fracture. The estimated mean impact of fractures on annual medical cost was $8,600 (95% confidence interval, $6,400 to $10,800), implying a US cost of $14 billion ($10 to $17 billion). Half of the non-fracture osteoporosis patients received drug treatment, averaging $500 per treated patient, or $2 billion nationwide.

CONCLUSIONS

The annual cost of osteoporosis and fractures in the US elderly was estimated at $16 billion, using a national 2002 population-based sample. This amount corroborates previous estimates based on substantially different methodologies. Projected to 2008, the national cost of osteoporosis and fractures was $22 billion.

Cost burden of second fracture in the US health system

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective claim-based study assessed 1-year medical costs associated with second fracture(s) for patients over 50 years old with an initial closed hip, clinical vertebral or non-hip non-vertebral (NHNV) fracture using 2002-2008 MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases.

METHODS

Patients with incident fracture and ≥12-month pre-period and follow-up period from the incident fracture were extracted. Index date was the first subsequent fracture date for patients with subsequent fracture during the 12-month (cases); index dates for patients without subsequent fractures during the 12-month follow-up (controls) were randomly assigned based on the distribution of index dates of cases. Total costs were examined during the 12-month follow-up period using generalized linear models. A decomposition analysis of the incremental costs attributable to the second fracture was conducted to examine what proportion of the difference was due to different patient characteristics and what proportion was due to different model structures between cases and controls.

RESULTS

For privately insured patients with hip, vertebral, or NHNV fracture, the 1-year second fracture rate was 8.0%, 5.1%, and 4.0%, and 1-year incremental costs were $47,351, $43,238, and $23,852, respectively; for Medicare patients, the corresponding rates and costs were 8.8%, 9.2%, and 8.2%, and $18,645, $19,702, and $19,697. Nationally projected annual cost of second fracture was $834 (95% confidence interval: $763-$914) million for patients with commercial insurance and $1.13 (95% confidence interval: $1.09-$1.17) billion for Medicare patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The average cost of patients with subsequent fracture(s) was substantial. Effective management of first fractures may help reduce the long-term economic and clinical burden.

Bazedoxifene: a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Several new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are currently under clinical development for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, with the goal of optimizing the estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist activity in target tissues. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM under clinical investigation for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Emerging clinical data have shown that bazedoxifene is effective in preventing bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, with no evidence of breast or endometrial stimulation. Two large, prospective, international phase 3 studies have been completed. In postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has been shown to preserve bone mineral density and to reduce bone turnover. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant protection against new vertebral fractures and against non-vertebral fractures in women at higher fracture risk. The treatment effects of bazedoxifene were supported by findings from independent re-analyses using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), which showed that bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of all clinical and morphometric vertebral fracture and of non-vertebral fracture in women at or above a FRAX-based threshold. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well tolerated in the phase 3 studies and showed neutral effects on the breast and an excellent endometrial safety profile; such attributes allow for the partnering of bazedoxifene with conjugated estrogens for menopausal symptom relief. Collectively, these results suggest that bazedoxifene may be a promising new therapy for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis as a monotherapy or in combination with conjugated estrogens in menopausal hormone therapy.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis affects millions of individuals, particularly postmenopausal women, and imposes a severe burden on patients and the healthcare system. Several therapeutic options are commercially available for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, including bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), raloxifene. Because each of these agents has its own individual risk-benefit profile, their use should be tailored to specific patient populations. While many agents are approved for osteoporosis, new therapies are needed that maximize efficacy outcomes and minimize safety concerns. Several new SERMs are being evaluated in an effort to achieve an ideal tissue selectivity profile, with beneficial effects on bone without negative effects on the endometrium and breast. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM that was recently approved in the European Union and is undergoing regulatory review in the United States for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety data for bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database and relevant congress abstract databases were searched to identify all pertinent literature on bazedoxifene for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In phase 3 clinical studies, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant reduction in the risk of new vertebral fracture versus placebo and positive effects on bone mineral density and bone turnover. Moreover, in a subgroup analysis of women at high risk for fracture, bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of nonvertebral fracture versus both placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well-tolerated in women with and at risk for osteoporosis, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Data inclusion for this review article was limited by what was available in the public domain.

CONCLUSION

The available clinical data suggest that bazedoxifene may offer a favorable risk-benefit profile for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Direct healthcare costs of hip, vertebral, and non-hip, non-vertebral fractures

Limited data exist regarding the cost of non-hip, non-vertebral (NHNV) fractures. Although NHNV fractures may be less expensive than hip and vertebral fractures, they have a higher incidence rate. The objective of this study was to quantify first-year healthcare costs of hip, vertebral, and NHNV fractures. This was a claims-based retrospective analysis using a case-control design among patients with commercial insurance and Medicare employer-based supplemental coverage. Patients were > or =50 years old with a closed hip, vertebral, or NHNV fracture between 7/1/2001 and 12/31/2004, and continuous enrollment 6 months prior to and 12 months after the index fracture. Adjusted mean first-year healthcare costs associated with these fractures were determined. Six cohorts were identified. Patients 50-64 years: NHNV (n=27,424), vertebral (n=3386) and hip (n=2423); patients > or =65 years: NHNV (n=40,960), vertebral (n=11,751) and hip (n=21,504). The ratio of NHNV to hip fractures was 11:1 in the 50-64 cohort and 2:1 in the > or =65 cohort. Adjusted mean first-year costs associated with hip, vertebral, and NHNV fractures were $26,545, $14,977, and $9183 for the 50-64 age cohort, and $15,196, $6701, and $6106 for patients > or =65 years. After taking prevalence rate into account, the proportion of the total fracture costs accounted for by NHNV, hip, and vertebral fractures were 66%, 21% and 13% for the 50-64 age cohort, and 36%, 52% and 12% for the > or =65 age cohort. Limitations included the exclusion of the uninsured and those covered by Medicaid or military-based insurance programs. The results of this study demonstrate that osteoporotic fractures are associated with significant costs. Although NHNV fractures have a lower per-patient cost than hip or vertebral fractures, their total first-year cost is greater for those 50-64 because of their higher prevalence.