Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens FLEEOX vs. XELOX in patients with initially unresectable advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score analysis

Efficacy of continuous gastric artery infusion chemotherapy in relieving digestive obstruction in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Obstruction or fullness after feeding is common in gastric cancer (GC) patients, affecting their nutritional status and quality of life. Patients with digestive obstruction are generally in a more advanced stage. Existing methods, including palliative gastrectomy, gastrojejunostomy, endoluminal stent, jejunal nutrition tube and intravenous chemotherapy, have limitations in treating these symptoms.

AIM

To analyze the efficacy of continuous gastric artery infusion chemotherapy (cGAIC) in relieving digestive obstruction in patients with advanced GC.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective study. Twenty-nine patients with digestive obstruction of advanced GC who underwent at least one cycle of treatment were reviewed at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The oxaliplatin-based intra-arterial infusion regimen was applied in all patients. Mild systemic chemotherapy was used in combination with local treatment. The clinical response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Digestive tract symptoms and toxic effects were analyzed regularly. A comparison of the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score and Stooler’s Dysphagia Score before and after therapy was made. Univariate survival analysis and multivariate survival analysis were also performed to explore the key factors affecting patient survival.

RESULTS

All patients finished cGAIC successfully without microcatheter displacement, as confirmed by arteriography. The median follow-up time was 24 mo (95%CI: 20.24-27.76 mo). The overall response rate was 89.7% after cGAIC according to the RECIST criteria. The postoperative Stooler’s Dysphagia Score was significantly improved. Twenty-two (75.9%) of the 29 patients experienced relief of digestive obstruction after the first two cycles, and 13 (44.8%) initially unresectable patients were then considered radically resectable. The median overall survival time (mOS) was 16 mo (95%CI: 9.32-22.68 mo). Patients who received radical surgery had a significantly longer mOS than other patients (P value < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that radical resection after cGAIC, intravenous chemotherapy after cGAIC, and immunotherapy after cGAIC were independent predictors of mOS. None of the patients stopped treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

cGAIC was effective and safe in relieving digestive obstruction in advanced GC, and it could improve surgical conversion possibility and survival time.

Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte, lymphocyte-to-monocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as prognostic and response biomarkers for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Perioperative fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) improves prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios are prognostic biomarkers but not predictive factors.

AIM

To assess blood ratios’ (NLR, LMR and PLR) potential predictive response to FLOT and survival outcomes in resectable LAGC patients.

METHODS

This was a multicentric retrospective study investigating the clinical potential of NLR, LMR, and PLR in resectable LAGC patients, treated with at least one preoperative FLOT cycle, from 12 Portuguese hospitals. Means were compared through non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis defined the cut-off values as: High PLR > 141 for progression and > 144 for mortality; high LMR > 3.56 for T stage regression (TSR). Poisson and Cox regression models the calculated relative risks/hazard ratios, using NLR, pathologic complete response, TSR, and tumor regression grade (TRG) as independent variables, and overall survival (OS) as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

This study included 295 patients (mean age, 63.7 years; 59.7% males). NLR was correlated with survival time (r = 0.143, P = 0.014). PLR was associated with systemic progression during FLOT (P = 0.022) and mortality (P = 0.013), with high PLR patients having a 2.2-times higher risk of progression [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-5.26] and 1.5-times higher risk of mortality (95%CI: 0.92-2.55). LMR was associated with TSR, and high LMR patients had a 1.4-times higher risk of achieving TSR (95%CI: 1.01-1.99). OS benefit was found with TSR (P = 0.015) and partial/complete TRG (P < 0.001). Patients without TSR and with no evidence of pathological response had 2.1-times (95%CI: 1.14-3.96) and 2.8-times (95%CI: 1.6-5) higher risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Higher NLR is correlated with longer survival time. High LMR patients have a higher risk of decreasing T stage, whereas high PLR patients have higher odds of progressing under FLOT and dying. Patients with TSR and a pathological response have better OS and lower risk of dying.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at?

Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.

Phase II Study of Preoperative Intra-Arterial Epirubicin, Etoposide, and Oxaliplatin Combined with Oral S-1 Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Borrmann Type 4 Gastric Cancer

Purpose

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative, intra-arterial perfusion of epirubicin, etoposide, and oxaliplatin combined with oral chemotherapy S-1 (SEEOX) for the treatment of type 4 gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

A single-center, single-arm phase II trial was conducted on 36 patients with histologically proven type 4 gastric cancer without distant peritoneal or organ metastasis. Patients received 3, 21-day courses of SEEOX preoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes assessed were chemotherapeutic response, radical resection rate, pathological regression, toxicities, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Results

All patients were at an advanced stage of cancer (stage III or IV) and completed the entire course of treatment. Based on changes in tumor volume and peritoneal metastasis, the objective response rate was 55.6% (20/36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5%–72.6%) and the disease control rate was 69.4% (25/36; 95% CI, 53.6%–85.3%). The radical resection rate was 75% (27/36; 95% CI, 60.1%–89.9%) and the proportion of R0 resections was 66.7% (21/36; 95% CI, 50.5%–82.8%). The pathological response rate was 33.3%, of which 13.9% showed complete pathological regression. The median survival was 27.1 months (95% CI, 22.24–31.97 months), and the 2-year OS was 48.5% (95% CI, 30.86%–66.1%).

Conclusions

Preoperative SEEOX is a safe and effective treatment for type 4 gastric cancer. Based on these preliminary data, a phase III study will be conducted to confirm the superiority of this regimen over standard treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02949258

Pathological response and outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DOC (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine) or EOF (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil) for clinical T3-T4 non-metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

In this prospective observational study, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel + oxaliplatin + capecitabine (DOC) with epirubicin + oxaliplatin + 5-fluouracil (EOF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for clinical T3 or T4 non-metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

The DOC NAC consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m² (days 1-8), oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m² twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. The EOF NAC consisted of intravenous (IV) epirubicin 50 mg/m2 combined with IV oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusion 5-fluouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. After 4 cycles of NAC or upon progression during chemotherapy, patients underwent gastrectomy with standard D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy. Pathological complete response rate per Becker tumor regression grading system was the primary endpoint and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (2-yr PFS) and 2-year overall survival (2-yr OS) and tolerability.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 63 patients with T3-4 non-metastatic GC starting either NAC regimen between January 2010 and December 2017 at our Institution: 34 in the DOC group and 29 in EOF group. Thirty patients (88%) in the DOC group and 22 (76%) in the EOF group completed the 4 planned cycles of NAC. Fifty-seven patients received surgery. Results indicated no statistical significant differences between the two groups, and only a trend for some better data in favour of the DOC group. The R0 resection rate was 90.6% and 88.0% for the DOC and EOF cohorts, respectively. The pathological complete response rate was 6.2% in the DOC group and 4.0% in the EOF group. Becker 1-2 pathological response was found in 46.8% of the DOC cohort and 28.0% of the EOF cohort (p = .14). The 2-yr PFS rate was 54.1% for DOC vs. 41.4% for EOF (p = .14) and the 2-yr OS rate was 80.8% for DOC vs. 58.6% for EOF (p = .05). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity and occurred in 8 (23.5%) patients of the DOC group and 10 (34.4%) patients of the EOF group (p = .33).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings seem to confirm the feasibility of NAC for clinically T3 and T4 non-metastatic GC and, despite no statistical significant difference was documented, suggest a trend for better activity and tolerability for the docetaxel-based regimen (DOC) compared to the epirubicin-based combination (EOF).

Effect of gefitinib on serum EGFR and CYFRA21-1 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Changes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) before and after gefitinib treatment were observed to explore the significance of such changes. A total of 175 patients with advanced NSCLC who were admitted to Hubei Cancer Hospital from July 2012 to October 2015 were collected and divided into two groups: the control group (85 patients who received conventional chemotherapy) and the experimental group (90 patients treated with gefitinib combined with chemotherapy). The serum expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The therapeutic efficacy and 3-year survival of the two groups were compared, and the factors affecting the survival of the patients were analyzed. The total effective rate and local effective rate of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Before treatment, no significant difference was detected in the levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1 in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). According to the 3-year survival rate, the experimental group was divided into the survival group and the non-survival group. Single factor analysis was performed on the general data, showing that the influencing factors of the survival include the KPS score, smoking history, number of lesions, pathological stage, EGFR, and CYFRA21-1. Gefitinib can bring significantly improved therapeutic efficacy, lower expression levels of EGFR and CYFRA21-1, and longer survival time for patients with advanced NSCLC. Indicators including confirmed smoking history, a KPS score less than or equal to 60 points, multiple lesions, pathological stage IV, high expression of EGFR and CYFRA21-1, are important factors affecting the survival of patient with advanced NSCLC.

Combined neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are representative blood markers of systemic inflammatory responses. However, the clinical significance of the combination of these markers is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the NLR and PLR in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy and assess the clinical utility of a new blood score combining the NLR and PLR (NLR-PLR score) as a predictor of tumor response and prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 175 patients with gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. These patients were categorized into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups according to tumor response. The NLR and PLR before treatment were examined, and the cut-off values were determined. The NLR-PLR score ranged from 0 to 2 as follows: score of 2, high NLR (> 2.461) and high PLR (> 248.4); score of 1, either high NLR or high PLR; score of 0, neither high NLR nor high PLR.

RESULTS

With regard to tumor response, 64 and 111 patients had PD and non-PD, respectively. The NLR-PLR score was significantly higher in patients with PD than in those with non-PD (p = 0.0009). The prognosis was significantly poorer in patients with a higher NLR-PLR score than in those with a lower NLR-PLR score (p <  0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NLR-PLR score was an independent prognostic factor for prediction of overall survival (p = 0.0392).

CONCLUSION

Low-cost stratification according to the NLR-PLR score might be a promising approach for predicting tumor response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A complete response to capecitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy in primary duodenal carcinoma with liver and nodal metastases: a case report

BACKGROUND

Primary duodenal adenocarcinoma (PDC) is a rare and lethal disease, and cases with nodal or distant metastasis have a poor prognosis. There are several reports of unresectable duodenal adenocarcinoma responding to systemic chemotherapy. However, there is little data on conversion surgery for PDC with distant metastasis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 55-year-old man with unresectable PDC with liver and nodal metastases responding to systemic chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). His metastatic lesions completely disappeared by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography after six courses of XELOX. Then, he underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymph node dissection and partial resection of the liver. Postoperatively, the histological effect was determined to be grade 3, and the patient was diagnosed as having achieved pathological complete response (pCR). He is disease-free with no evidence of metastatic lesion for 14 months after surgery. Conversion surgery allowed R0 resection for unresectable PDC, and pCR can be achieved with XELOX treatment.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first report of conversion surgery for unresectable PDC with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastases.