1
|
Thwaites DI, Prokopovich DA, Garrett RF, Haworth A, Rosenfeld A, Ahern V. The rationale for a carbon ion radiation therapy facility in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71 Suppl 2:59-76. [PMID: 38061984 PMCID: PMC11011608 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Australia has taken a collaborative nationally networked approach to achieve particle therapy capability. This supports the under-construction proton therapy facility in Adelaide, other potential proton centres and an under-evaluation proposal for a hybrid carbon ion and proton centre in western Sydney. A wide-ranging overview is presented of the rationale for carbon ion radiation therapy, applying observations to the case for an Australian facility and to the clinical and research potential from such a national centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Institute of Medical ResearchSt James's Hospital and University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | | | - Richard F. Garrett
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology OrganisationLucas HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anatoly Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, School of PhysicsUniversity of WollongongSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation OncologySydney West Radiation Oncology NetworkWestmeadNew South WalesAustralia
- Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bragazzi MC, Venere R, Ribichini E, Covotta F, Cardinale V, Alvaro D. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evolving strategies in management and treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:383-393. [PMID: 37722960 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. According to International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is identified by a specific diagnostic code, different with respect to perihilar-CCA or distal-CCA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma originates from intrahepatic small or large bile ducts including the second-order bile ducts and has a silent presentation that combined with the highly aggressive nature and refractoriness to chemotherapy contributes to the alarming increasing incidence and mortality. Indeed, at the moment of the diagnosis, less than 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are suitable of curative surgical therapy, that is so far the only effective treatment. The main goals of clinicians and researchers are to make an early diagnosis, and to carry out molecular characterization to provide the patient with personalized treatment. Unfortunately, these goals are not easily achievable because of the heterogeneity of this tumor from anatomical, molecular, biological, and clinical perspectives. However, recent progress has been made in molecular characterization, surgical treatment, and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and, this article deals with these advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Consiglia Bragazzi
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Italy.
| | - Rosanna Venere
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Italy
| | - Emanuela Ribichini
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Covotta
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cardinale
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Department Translational and Precision, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Endo M. Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 3): Chapter 3. Clinical research, Chapter 4. Future challenges, Chapter 5. Discussion, and Conclusion. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:443-470. [PMID: 37882992 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Clinical studies of ion beam therapy have been performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), and Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), in addition to the development of equipment, biophysical models, and treatment planning systems. Although cancers, including brain tumors and pancreatic cancer, have been treated with the Bevalac's neon-ion beam at the LBL (where the first clinical research was conducted), insufficient results were obtained owing to the limited availability of neon-ion beams and immaturity of related technologies. However, the 184-Inch Cyclotron's helium-ion beam yielded promising results for chordomas and chondrosarcomas at the base of the skull. Using carbon-ion beams, NIRS has conducted clinical trials for the treatment of common cancers for which radiotherapy is indicated. Because better results than X-ray therapy results have been obtained for lung, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers, as well as pelvic recurrences of rectal cancer, the Japanese government recently approved the use of public medical insurance for carbon-ion radiotherapy, except for lung cancer. GSI obtained better results than LBL for bone and soft tissue tumors, owing to dose enhancement enabled by scanning irradiation. In addition, DKFZ compared treatment results of proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy for these tumors. This article summarizes a series of articles (Parts 1-3) and describes future issues of immune ion beam therapy and linear energy transfer optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Endo
- Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine, Nikkei Bldg., 7-16 Nihombashi-Kodemmacho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0001, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bourien H, Pircher CC, Guiu B, Lamarca A, Valle JW, Niger M, Edeline J. Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4217. [PMID: 37686493 PMCID: PMC10486617 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héloïse Bourien
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France;
| | - Chiara Carlotta Pircher
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy; (C.C.P.); (M.N.)
| | - Boris Guiu
- Interventional Radiology Department, CHU de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France;
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Oncology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, 28022 Madrid, Spain;
- Medical Oncology Department, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Medical Oncology Department, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy; (C.C.P.); (M.N.)
| | - Julien Edeline
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, 35000 Rennes, France;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yamazaki H, Shibuya K, Kimoto T, Suzuki M, Murakami M, Terashima K, Okimoto T, Iizumi T, Sakurai H, Wakatsuki M, Suzuki O, Katoh N, Arimura T, Ogino T, Takagi M, Araya M, Waki T, Matsumoto S, Ogino H, Fukumoto T, Ohtsuka M. Proton beam therapy for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer: Analysis with prospective multi-institutional patients' registration database, Proton-Net. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100634. [PMID: 37234735 PMCID: PMC10206422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To examine the role of proton beam therapy (PBT) in the treatment of extrahepatic biliary tract cancer (EBC). Methods and materials We analyzed the data accumulated in the Proton-Net database, which prospectively registered all individual patient data treated with PBT in all Japanese proton institutions from May 2016 to June 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results Ninety-three patients with unresectable and/or recurrent EBC were treated with PBT using a median prescribed dose of 67.5 Gy (RBE) (range, 50-72.6 Gy) in 25 (22-30 fractions). With a median follow-up of 16.3 months, the median survival time was 20.1 months and the 2-year OS was 37.8%. Two-year PFS and LC rates were 20.6% and 66.5%, respectively. Poor liver function (Child-Pugh B, C), a narrower distance between the tumor and digestive tract (2 cm >), and a larger tumor diameter (2 cm <) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. PBT-related grade 3 ≤ acute and late adverse events occurred in 5.4% and 4.3% of patients, respectively, including one gastrointestinal late toxicity (duodenal ulcer). Conclusions This is the largest prospectively accumulated series of PBT for EBC, and PBT showed favorable outcomes with acceptable toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kazuki Terashima
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Okimoto
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Osaka Heavy Ion Administration Company, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takeshi Arimura
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Takahiro Waki
- Department of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan
| | - Sae Matsumoto
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alvaro D, Gores GJ, Walicki J, Hassan C, Sapisochin G, Komuta M, Forner A, Valle JW, Laghi A, Ilyas SI, Park JW, Kelley RK, Reig M, Sangro B. EASL-ILCA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2023; 79:181-208. [PMID: 37084797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) develops inside the liver, between bile ductules and the second-order bile ducts. It is the second most frequent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, and its global incidence is increasing. It is associated with an alarming mortality rate owing to its silent presentation (often leading to late diagnosis), highly aggressive nature and resistance to treatment. Early diagnosis, molecular characterisation, accurate staging and personalised multidisciplinary treatments represent current challenges for researchers and physicians. Unfortunately, these challenges are beset by the high heterogeneity of iCCA at the clinical, genomic, epigenetic and molecular levels, very often precluding successful management. Nonetheless, in the last few years, progress has been made in molecular characterisation, surgical management, and targeted therapy. Recent advances together with the awareness that iCCA represents a distinct entity amongst the CCA family, led the ILCA and EASL governing boards to commission international experts to draft dedicated evidence-based guidelines for physicians involved in the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic management of iCCA.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ohaegbulam KC, Koethe Y, Fung A, Mayo SC, Grossberg AJ, Chen EY, Sharzehi K, Kardosh A, Farsad K, Rocha FG, Thomas CR, Nabavizadeh N. The multidisciplinary management of cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2023; 129:184-214. [PMID: 36382577 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a lethal malignancy of the biliary epithelium that can arise anywhere along the biliary tract. Surgical resection confers the greatest likelihood of long-term survivability. However, its insidious onset, difficult diagnostics, and resultant advanced presentation render the majority of patients unresectable, highlighting the importance of early detection with novel biomarkers. Developing liver-directed therapies and emerging targeted therapeutics may offer improved survivability for patients with unresectable or advanced disease. In this article, the authors review the current multidisciplinary standards of care in resectable and unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, with an emphasis on novel biomarkers for early detection and nonsurgical locoregional therapy options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim C Ohaegbulam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yilun Koethe
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alice Fung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Aaron J Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Emerson Y Chen
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kaveh Sharzehi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adel Kardosh
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Khashayar Farsad
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Nima Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yamazaki H, Kimoto T, Suzuki M, Murakami M, Suzuki O, Takagi M, Katoh N, Arimura T, Ogino T, Ogino H. Particle Beam Therapy for Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Biliary Duct Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Data Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235864. [PMID: 36497346 PMCID: PMC9736951 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
To examine the efficacy and toxicity of particle beam therapy (PT) for biliary duct carcinoma (BDC) and compare the outcomes between extrahepatic BDC (eBDC) and intrahepatic BDC (iBDC). We analyzed multi-institutional data from May 2009 to December 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. We included 150 patients with unresectable BDC treated with PT using a median prescribed dose of 70.2 GyRBE (range, 44-77 GyRBE) in 25 fractions (range, 10-38 fractions). With a median follow-up of 13.0 months, median survival time (MST) was 21 months, and 2-year OS was 44.8%. For eBDC and iBDC, the MSTs were 20 and 23 months, respectively. Two-year PFS and LC rates were 20.6% and 66.5%, respectively. Vascular invasion, prescribed dose and serum tumor marker level (carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were identified as poor prognostic factors for OS. A higher radiation dose EQD2 ≥ 67 Gy showed superior OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.341. The radiation dose of PT is an important predisposing factor for overall survival. The MST for patients with eBDC given a higher radiation dose was 25 months, compared to 15 months for those given the lower dose and 23 months for patients with iBDC (all iBDC given higher doses). iBDC and eBDC duct carcinomas showed equivalent outcomes with PT, especially when treated with a high radiation dose. In detailed analysis, baseline CEA level in iBDC, and radiation dose and GTV in eBDC were statistically significant predicators for OS. Acute and late toxicity grade ≥3 occurred in 2.2% and 2.7% of patients, respectively, including two late grade-5 toxicities. In conclusion, PT showed good efficacy for BDC, both eBDC and iBDC, with a low incidence of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Takuya Kimoto
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama 963-8052, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama 963-8052, Japan
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Osaka Heavy Ion Administration Company, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0008, Japan
| | - Masaru Takagi
- Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital, Sapporo 065-0033, Japan
| | - Norio Katoh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan
| | - Takeshi Arimura
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima 891-0304, Japan
| | - Takashi Ogino
- Medipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima 891-0304, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inchingolo R, Acquafredda F, Ferraro V, Laera L, Surico G, Surgo A, Fiorentino A, Marini S, de'Angelis N, Memeo R, Spiliopoulos S. Non-surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1696-1708. [PMID: 34853644 PMCID: PMC8603446 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i11.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the biliary confluence also known as hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) or Klatskin tumor, is a rare type of neoplastic disease constituting approximately 40%-60% of intrahepatic malignancies, and 2% of all cancers. The prognosis is extremely poor and the majority of Klatskin tumors are deemed unresectable upon diagnosis. Most patients with unresectable bile duct cancer die within the first year after diagnosis, due to hepatic failure, and/or infectious complications secondary to biliary obstruction. Curative treatments include surgical resection and liver transplantation in highly selected patients. Nevertheless, very few patients are eligible for surgery or transplant at the time of diagnosis. For patients with unresectable HC, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and liver-directed minimally invasive procedures such as percutaneous image-guided ablation and intra-arterial chemoembolization are recommended treatment options. This review focuses on currently available treatment options for unresectable HC and discusses future perspectives that could optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Acquafredda
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Surico
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stefania Marini
- Department of Radiology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stavros Spiliopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12461, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yu Q, Liu C, Pillai A, Ahmed O. Twenty Years of Radiation Therapy of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarinoma: Internal or External? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Liver Cancer 2021; 10:433-450. [PMID: 34721506 PMCID: PMC8527917 DOI: 10.1159/000516880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and selective-internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are implemented to treat unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EBRT and SIRT in managing iCCA through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed and Cochrane database were queried to search for studies published from January 2000 toJune 2020 without language restrictions. Median survival time, overall survival, and radiological response were extracted. Secondary outcomes such as complication rates, predictors of survival, and downstage to surgery were pooled. Patient-level survival data were obtained to generate Kaplan-Meier survival graph. Pooled outcomes were analyzed with a random-effect model. RESULTS Twenty-nine and 20 studies including 732 and 443 patients from the SIRT and EBRT groups were included in the present study. From initial radiation treatment, the median survival time for patients who underwent SIRT and EBRT were 12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8-14.6) and 13.6 (95% CI: 11.1-16.0) months, respectively. As first-line therapy, the median survival time was 36.1 (95% CI: 20.6-39.5) months for SIRT and 11.0 (95% CI: 9.3-13.6) months for EBRT. Both radiation modalities were effective in downstaging initially unresectable iCCA to surgery (SIRT: 30.5%; EBRT: 18.3%). Patients in the SIRT group encountered more post-embolization abdominal pain (6.9 vs. 2.2%), ulcer (1.0 vs. 0.5%), nausea (1.6 vs. 0.7%), anorexia (5.9 vs. 0%), thrombocytopenia (7.3 vs. 6.0%), hyperbilirubinemia (5.2 vs. 2.1%), and hypoalbuminemia (13.2 vs. 3.3%), whereas EBRT was associated with higher rates of anemia (0.6 vs. 7.5%) and neutropenia (6.5 vs. 11.0%). CONCLUSIONS Both EBRT and SIRT were safe and effective in treating unresectable iCCA. However, available evidence was highly heterogeneous regarding patient population, limiting fair comparison between 2 radiation modalities. Future high-quality comparative studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA,*Qian Yu, yuqian1006*gmail.com
| | - Chenyu Liu
- Ben May Department of Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hong-Gyun Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang Q, Kong L, Liu R, Wang X. Ion therapy guideline (Version 2020). PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, ••• No.509 Nanchang road, Chengguan district, Lanzhou city Lanzhou City 730000 China
| | - Lin Kong
- Shanghai Proton Heavy Ion Hospital, Shanghai China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, ••• No.509 Nanchang road, Chengguan district, Lanzhou city Lanzhou City 730000 China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, ••• No.509 Nanchang road, Chengguan district, Lanzhou city Lanzhou City 730000 China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jethwa KR, Sannapaneni S, Mullikin TC, Harmsen WS, Petersen MM, Antharam P, Laughlin B, Mahipal A, Halfdanarson TR, Merrell KW, Neben-Wittich M, Sio TT, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 11:1408-1420. [PMID: 33457010 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes. Results Forty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), 20% (95% CI: 11-36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2-20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12-36%), 27% (95% CI: 17-44%), 31% (95% CI: 20-48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy10 was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy10 remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively. Conclusions RT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shilpa Sannapaneni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Molly M Petersen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Brady Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gkika E, Hawkins MA, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:604387. [PMID: 33381458 PMCID: PMC7768034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malouff TD, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Mahajan A, Foote RL, Hoppe B, Beltran C, Buskirk SJ, Krishnan S, Trifiletti DM. Estimating the Number of Patients Eligible for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the United States. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:31-41. [PMID: 33274255 PMCID: PMC7707324 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00079.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiotherapy modality with potential advantages over conventional photon-based therapy, including exhibiting a Bragg peak and greater relative biological effectiveness, leading to a higher degree of cell kill. Currently, 13 centers are treating with CIRT, although there are no centers in the United States. We aimed to estimate the number of patients eligible for a CIRT center in the United States. Materials and Methods Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed the incidence of cancers frequently treated with CIRT internationally (glioblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, localized prostate cancer, soft tissue sarcomas, and specific head and neck cancers) diagnosed in the United States in 2015. The percentage and number of patients likely benefiting from CIRT was estimated with inclusion criteria from clinical trials and retrospective studies, and that ratio was applied to 2019 cancer statistics. An adaption correction rate was applied to estimate the potential number of patients treated with CIRT. Given the high dependency on prostate and lung cancers and the uncertain adoption of CIRT in those diseases, the data were then reanalyzed excluding those diagnoses. Results Of the 1 127 455 new cases of cancer diagnosed in the United States in 2015, there were 213 073 patients (18.9%) eligible for treatment with CIRT based on inclusion criteria. When applying this rate and the adaption correction rate to the 2019 incidence data, an estimated 89 946 patients (42.2% of those fitting inclusion criteria) are eligible for CIRT. Excluding prostate and lung cancers, there were an estimated 8922 patients (10% of those eligible for CIRT) eligible for CIRT. The number of patients eligible for CIRT is estimated to increase by 25% to 27.7% by 2025. Conclusion Our analysis suggests a need for CIRT in the United States in 2019, with the number of patients possibly eligible to receive CIRT expected to increase during the coming 5 to 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Laura A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bradford Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Steven J Buskirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Takakusagi S, Takagi H, Shibuya K, Kosone T, Sato K, Kakizaki S, Ohno T, Uraoka T. Two elder cases of hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to intrahepatic vessels successfully treated by carbon ion radiotherapy. Clin J Gastroenterol 2020; 13:920-926. [PMID: 32529487 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-020-01151-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to the portal vein and/or bile duct requires considerable caution to avoid the complications, such as hepatic infarction and obstructive jaundice. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been attempted for HCC and has become accepted as a promising modality for minimizing hepatic damage with good local tumor control. We experienced two elder cases of HCC adjacent to intrahepatic vessels successfully treated by CIRT. Case 1, a 75-year-old man, was treated by CIRT for a 2-cm HCC near the porta hepatis adjacent to the right first portal branch. The treatment was sufficiently effective, and no vascular damage was demonstrated after CIRT. The liver function transiently deteriorated after CIRT, but recovered quickly. Alpha-fetoprotein transiently increased after the treatment and decreased thereafter. Tumor stain persisted for 3 months after CIRT, so a liver tumor biopsy was performed. However, no viable carcinoma cells were detected. There was no local recurrence or complications for 17 months. Case 2, 76-year-old male HCC patient, showed dilation of the peripheral bile duct in the left lobe, suggesting tumor invasion to the duct. The tumor was hypovascular and was found to be well-differentiated HCC by a tumor biopsy. He was treated with CIRT, because he had a history of cerebral infarction and was being administered an antiplatelet agent daily. He achieved complete remission, and no adverse events were observed after the treatment for 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Takakusagi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kusunoki Hospital, 607-22 Fujioka, Fujioka, Gunma, 375-0024, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kusunoki Hospital, 607-22 Fujioka, Fujioka, Gunma, 375-0024, Japan.
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Kosone
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kusunoki Hospital, 607-22 Fujioka, Fujioka, Gunma, 375-0024, Japan
| | - Ken Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Satoru Kakizaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang L, Deng M, Ke Q, Lou J, Zheng S, Bi X, Wang J, Guo W, Li F, Wang J, Zheng Y, Li J, Cheng S, Zhou W, Zeng Y. Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2674-2685. [PMID: 32072774 PMCID: PMC7163087 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory; however, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of AT and identify potential patients who would be benefited from AT. Methods Data from ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between December 2012 and December 2015. Patients were divided into AT and non‐AT groups based on whether AT was administered or not. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method before and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the established staging systems. Results A total of 412 patients were enrolled in this study, and 77 patients (18.9%) received AT, including 32 (7.8%) patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 21 (5.1%) patients who received chemotherapy, 10 (2.4%) patients who received radiotherapy, and 14 (3.4%) patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median OS and DFS were both longer in the AT group than in the non‐AT group (43.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .015; 16.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .045, respectively), and the advantage of AT was confirmed for both the OS and DFS (P = .023; P = .046, respectively) after 1:2 PSM. Furthermore, based on the established nomogram, only “middle‐risk” patients receiving AT cherished a longer median OS (43.0 months vs 20.0 months, P = .033). In subgroup analyses that were stratified by different AT strategies, patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy had a longer median OS (37.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .039), while patients receiving postoperative TACE had a longer median DFS (50.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .007). Conclusion With the current data, we conclude that AT benefits ICC patients following radical resection, especially those “middle‐risk” patients, as evaluated by the established nomogram. However, exactly which patients are the most suitable for AT requires further study and validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Manjun Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiao Ke
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianying Lou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuguo Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Southwest Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fuyu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yamin Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jingdong Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical University, Nanchong, China
| | - Shi Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Ⅲ, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongyi Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malouff TD, Mahajan A, Krishnan S, Beltran C, Seneviratne DS, Trifiletti DM. Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology. Front Oncol 2020; 10:82. [PMID: 32117737 PMCID: PMC7010911 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is one of the most widely used therapies for malignancies. The therapeutic use of heavy ions, such as carbon, has gained significant interest due to advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties compared to photon based therapy. By taking advantage of these unique properties, carbon ion radiotherapy may allow dose escalation to tumors while reducing radiation dose to adjacent normal tissues. There are currently 13 centers treating with carbon ion radiotherapy, with many of these centers publishing promising safety and efficacy data from the first cohorts of patients treated. To date, carbon ion radiotherapy has been studied for almost every type of malignancy, including intracranial malignancies, head and neck malignancies, primary and metastatic lung cancers, tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, prostate and genitourinary cancers, sarcomas, cutaneous malignancies, breast cancer, gynecologic malignancies, and pediatric cancers. Additionally, carbon ion radiotherapy has been studied extensively in the setting of recurrent disease. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the studies of each of these disease sites, with a focus on the current trials using carbon ion radiotherapy.
Collapse
|