Positive predictive value of ERBB2 copy number gain by tissue or circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing across advanced cancers

Comparison of an amplicon-based large panel next generation sequencing (NGS) assay with conventional testing methods for MET and HER2 amplification in lung and breast cancers

The frequency of MET and HER2 amplification being detected by next generation sequencing (NGS) is increasing due to NGS being increasingly adopted for molecular profiling of cancers. However, the accuracy of NGS in detecting these gene amplifications remains uncertain due to conflicting reports in the scientific literature. We studied the accuracy of an amplicon-based large panel NGS assay in detecting MET and HER2 amplification in lung and breast cancers, respectively, by comparing it against conventional testing methods. Amongst 48 lung cancers, four of five cancers that were MET amplified on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) were classified as amplified on NGS while 42 of the remaining 43 non-amplified cancers were classified as non-amplified on NGS, giving a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 97.7% and overall concordance of 95.8%. Of the 46 breast cancers tested, only six of the nine cancers that were HER2-positive on immunohistochemistry (IHC)/FISH were HER2-positive on NGS, while all the remaining HER2-negative cases were negative on NGS, giving a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 100% and overall concordance of 93.5%. All the false-negative cases had low level gene amplification (MET:CEP7 or HER2:CEP17 FISH ratio of <3). The low sensitivity for HER2 amplification may be confounded by the small sample size and disproportionate number of cases with low level amplification. In summary, the NGS assay has good concordance with conventional testing methods but may be less sensitive in detecting low level gene amplification.

Scrotal Paget's Disease Associated With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Overexpressing Metastatic Apocrine Carcinoma With Complete Response to Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab

Case report and literature review of targeted treatment of HER2-positive cutaneous apocrine carcinoma.

A Phase II Single-arm Study of Palbociclib in Patients With HER2-positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases and Analysis of ctDNA in Patients With Active Brain Metastases

INTRODUCTION

Palbociclib is highly efficacious and well tolerated in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (BC) but its activity for HER2+ BC with brain metastases (BM) is unknown.

METHODS

In a single-arm phase II study we evaluated palbociclib with trastuzumab for patients with HER2+ MBC and BM. The primary endpoint was BM response rate. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was evaluated at baseline, and in a subset of patients at cycle 3 and progression. We also retrospectively identified additional patients with metastatic BC, active BM, and a ctDNA assessment prior to therapy for BM.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with HER2+ MBC were enrolled, 4 with HR+ and 8 with HR- disease. No responses were seen. Best response was stable disease for 6 patients and progressive disease for 6 patients. The median PFS was 2.2 months, interquartile range (IQR) was 1.56 to 3.63 months. The median OS was 13.1 months and IQR was 9.4 to 23.8 months The CNS was the primary site of progression for all patients. The median variant allele fraction (VAF) of the dominant variant in each patient was 0.18% (interquartile range [IQR] 0.12%-0.47%) with a median number of somatic alterations of 1. We additionally evaluated ctDNA results from 26 patients with BC and active BM, among whom the median VAF was 11.8% (IQR 3.9%-27.3%) with a median number of alterations was 6 (IQR 4-9). Notably, progressive systemic disease was significantly less frequent in the trial cohort compared with additional retrospectively identified patients (8% vs. 81%).

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib did not demonstrate activity in HER2+ MBC with BM. Patients with progressive BM but stable, responding, or absent systemic disease have low VAF and number of alterations detected by ctDNA analysis from blood.