Diverse Representation in Nursing Leadership: Developing a Shared Position Statement on Allyship

Gender Binaries in Nursing: A Critical Shift to Postgenderism

Gender binaries refer to grouping systems that label individuals as male or female. Societal shifts in what defines gender have evolved over the past decade; however, nursing practice remains grounded in these traditional gender binaries. The negative impacts of these practices, specifically in reproductive care, are detrimental for individuals who do not identify within traditional gender binaries. Gender binaries and stereotypes persist because of the prevalence of attitudes; nursing education development; and biases within care areas-specifically, reproductive care-because of issues such as gendered theories and language. Nurses can play a role in enhancing inclusivity by encouraging reflective practice, implementing gender-informed concepts into curricula, and encouraging the use of a postgenderism lens in policy and practice. Improvements in these areas can help foster health care access and safety.

The impact of racism on emergency health care workers

INTRODUCTION

Discrimination based on race is a known source of stress in individuals and is a contributor to poor health outcomes in patients. However, less is known about how the experiences of racism impact the stress levels of emergency health care workers (EHCWs).

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to assess the impact that racism has on the stress of EHCWs.

METHODS

An anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey of EHCWs including attending physicians, resident physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and staff at three large metropolitan hospitals was administered in the summer of 2020. The survey evaluated the stress related to systemic racism and the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to the wellness measures utilized to cope with these stressors. The focus of this article is the impact of systemic racism on EHCWs.

RESULTS

Of the 576 eligible participants, the total number of respondents utilized for analysis was 260. Overall, 64% of participants were very concerned about the state of racism in the United States, and 30% reported moderate-high or high stress resulting from racism. When stratified by race, 46% of Black participants reported moderate-high or high stress resulting from racism, compared to 31% of other participants of color and 23% of White participants (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Systemic racism is a significant concern and source of stress for EHCWs. Additional research about systemic racism, its impact on medical providers, and more importantly, active strategies to reduce and ultimately eliminate it in health care is needed.

Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada

INTRODUCTION

Participatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research.

METHODS

Eleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion.

RESULTS

Few empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project's onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research.

CONCLUSION

As Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal.