Itraconazole prophylaxis for invasive gingival aspergillosis in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia

Trough concentration of itraconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The optimum trough concentration of itraconazole for clinical response and safty is controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the optimum trough concentration of itraconazole and evaluate its relationship with efficacy and safety.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Clinical-Trials.gov, and three Chinese literature databases (CNKI, WanFang, and CBM). We included observational studies that compared clinical outcomes below or above the trough concentration cut-off value which we set as 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/L. The efficacy outcomes were rate of successful treatment, rate of prophylaxis failure and invasive fungal infection (IFI)-related mortality. The safety outcomes included incidents of hepatotoxicity and other adverse events.

Results

The study included a total of 29 studies involving 2,346 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that compared with itraconazole trough concentrations (C_trough) of ≥0.25 mg/L, levels of <0.25 mg/L significantly increased the incidence of IFI for prophylaxis (RR =3.279, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–6.206). Moreover, the success rate of treatment decreased significantly at a cut-off level of 0.5 mg/L (RR =0.396, 95% CI 0.176–0.889). An itraconazole trough level of 1.0 mg/L was associated with hepatotoxicity and other adverse events in a review of many studies.

Conclusion

An itraconazole trough concentration of 0.25 mg/L should be considered as the lower threshold for prophylaxis, and a target concentration of 0.5 mg/L should be the lower limit for effective treatment. A trough level of 1.0 mg/L is associated with increased hepatotoxicity and other adverse events (using High Performance Liquid Chromatography [HPLC]).

Itraconazole (Sporanox®) in superficial and systemic fungal infections

Itraconazole (Sporanox) is a triazole antifungal agent with a broad activity spectrum and favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Numerous clinical trials have established the efficacy and safety of itraconazole in the treatment of superficial fungal infections. In this field, full exploitation of its pharmacokinetics in keratinized tissues has led to the development of intermittent (pulse) treatment regimens that allow similar efficacy with lower overall drug exposure as well as a reduction in treatment costs. The additional anti-inflammatory action of itraconazole also makes it suitable for application in difficult-to-treat inflammatory skin disorders, such as seborrheic dermatitis. Recently, a new oral liquid formulation and an intravenous formulation have been developed, extending the therapeutic application of itraconazole to systemic fungal infections. Due to its broad activity spectrum and excellent tolerability, itraconazole is a valuable addition to the antifungal armamentarium used for prophylactic and empiric treatment in immunocompromised hosts.

Itraconazole antagonizes store-operated influx of calcium into chemoattractant-activated human neutrophils

We have investigated the effects of itraconazole (0.1-10 micro m), an antimycotic which is often used prophylactically in primary and secondary immunodeficiency disorders, including chronic granulomatous disease, on mobilization of Ca(2+) and restoration of Ca(2+) homeostasis following activation of neutrophils with FMLP or PAF. Transmembrane fluxes of Ca(2+), as well as cytosolic concentrations of the cation were measured using a combination of spectrofluorimetric and radiometric procedures. The abruptly occurring increases in cytosolic Ca(2+) following activation of the cells with either FMLP (1 micro m) or PAF (200 nm) were unaffected by itraconazole. However, the subsequent store-operated influx of the cation was attenuated by itraconazole at concentrations of 0.25 micro m and higher. The itraconazole-mediated inhibition of uptake of Ca(2+) was not associated with detectable alterations in the intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP, ATP or inositol triphosphate, and appeared to be compatible with antagonism of store-operated Ca(2+) channels. Although a secondary property, this anti-inflammatory activity of itraconazole, if operative in vivo, may be beneficial in conditions associated with dysregulation of neutrophil Ca(2+) handling such as CGD.

Beneficial pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to renal transplant recipients, who require concomitant cyclosporine in the immediate posttransplant period. We determined the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and itraconazole oral solution in renal transplant recipients and the effect on daily drug costs.

METHOD

This was a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized study. Posttransplantation, renal transplant recipients received itraconazole solution 200 mg twice daily and cyclosporine, dosed to achieve target concentrations. Once at steady state, blood samples were collected over 12 hours for pharmacokinetic evaluation of cyclosporine, itraconazole, and hydroxy-itraconazole. Itraconazole was discontinued after approximately a 3-month prophylaxis regimen. Cyclosporine doses were titrated to achieve target concentrations and cyclosporine concentrations were once again determined when steady state was achieved. A noncompartmental analysis was used to analyze cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacoeconomic impact was measured based on the percent change in dose of cyclosporine when administered with and without itraconazole. Drug costs were calculated using the average wholesale price. The cost per patient, as well as the average cost, was calculated for the cyclosporine/itraconazole combination, as well as the cyclosporine regimen alone.

RESULTS

Eight renal transplant recipients completed the study. All were included for itraconazole analyses and seven for cyclosporine analyses. Mean peak and trough itraconazole levels were 1.64 +/- 0.82 and 1.23 +/- 0.90 microg/mL respectively. Mean peak and trough hydroxy-itraconazole levels were 2.37 +/- 1.55 and 2.20 +/- 1.48 microg/mL, respectively. While on itraconazole, a 48% reduction in the mean total daily dose of cyclosporine was necessary to maintain target concentrations (171 +/- 63.6 versus 329 +/- 103.5 mg, P =.003). This reduction in cyclosporine dose resulted in a discounted itraconazole daily drug cost of approximately 29.5%.

CONCLUSION

Administering itraconazole with cyclosporine allows for a decrease in the cyclosporine dose, thus lowering daily drug costs and providing adequate antifungal coverage with itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole trough concentrations above the MIC(90) of Candida and Aspergillus spp.

Itraconazole to prevent fungal infections in chronic granulomatous disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic granulomatous disease is a rare disorder in which the phagocytes fail to produce hydrogen peroxide. The patients are predisposed to bacterial and fungal infections. Prophylactic antibiotics and interferon gamma have reduced bacterial infections, but there is also the danger of life-threatening fungal infections. We assessed the efficacy of itraconazole as prophylaxis against serious fungal infections in chronic granulomatous disease.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients at least 5 years old (6 female and 33 male; mean age, 14.9 years) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After the initially assigned treatment, each patient alternated between itraconazole and placebo annually. Patients 13 years of age or older and all patients weighing at least 50 kg received a single dose of 200 mg of itraconazole per day; those less than 13 years old or weighing less than 50 kg received a single dose of 100 mg per day. The primary end point was severe fungal infection, as determined by histologic results or culture.

RESULTS

One patient (who had not been compliant with the treatment) had a serious fungal infection while receiving itraconazole, as compared with seven who had a serious fungal infection while receiving placebo (P=0.10). No patient receiving itraconazole but five patients receiving placebo had a superficial fungal infection. No serious toxic effects were noted, although one patient had a rash and another had elevated results on liver-function tests; both of these effects resolved with the discontinuation of itraconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole prophylaxis appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment that reduces the frequency of fungal infections in chronic granulomatous disease, but monitoring for long-term toxic effects is warranted.

Successful treatment of invasive stomatitis due to Exophiala dermatitidis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Although the most common orofacial fungal infection in immunocompromised patients is candidosis, infections caused by virulent molds, such as Aspergillus spp. and Furarium spp. are being recognized with increasing frequency. We report a case of oral Exophiala infection in a 39-year-old woman with acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

Clinical records of the patient were reviewed and the following additional information was collected: histological and microbiological evidence; identification of the causative organism; in vitro antifungal susceptibility.

RESULTS

The patient developed a necrotic ulcer surrounded by a violaceous rim in the gingiva during neutropenia. Exophiala dermatitidis was identified as the causative organism by histopathological examination and culture, and finally confirmed by sequencing of the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed space domain. In vitro, amphotericin B was found to show strong activity against the Exophiala isolate while itraconazole showed less activity. The patient was successfully treated with parenteral amphotericin B and oral itraconazole in combination with surgical removal of the fungi focus.

CONCLUSION

Local excision with adequate antifungal agents can be used to treat immunocompromised patients with Exophiala stomatitis, based on early diagnosis.