A Randomized Controlled Trial of Lisinopril to Decrease Lymphoid Fibrosis in Antiretroviral-Treated, HIV-infected Individuals

Distinct Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors on Soluble Biomarkers in Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of People With HIV

BACKGROUND

Persistent inflammation affects people with HIV (PWH) despite antiretroviral therapy (ART). Selective serotonin and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, SNRIs), HMG-CoA reductase-inhibitors (statins), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have immunomodulant properties. We evaluated the potential impact of these drugs on inflammation and neurodegeneration in PWH.

METHODS

Cross-sectional single-center (United States) analysis in 184 PWH on ART with plasma HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL. All participants had 10 biomarkers measured in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). To reduce dimensionality, hierarchical clustering and principal components (PCs) analysis were employed. The analyses were adjusted for duration of the drugs and clinical conditions.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly middle-aged men, with median CD4+ T cells of 620/µL. In adjusted models, SSRI use was associated with 3 PCs: higher CSF and plasma Aβ42 and CSF CCL2 (aβ=.14, P = .040); lower CSF 8-oxo-dG, total tau, and sCD14 (aβ=-.12, P = .042); and higher plasma sCD14 with lower sCD40L (aβ=.15, P = .042). SNRI use was associated with higher values of CSF and plasma neopterin and CSF sTNFR-II (aβ=.22, P = .004). Statins and ACEIs showed no association.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs and SNRIs had distinct biomarker signatures. SSRIs were associated with reduced neurodegeneration, immune activation, and oxidative stress in CSF, suggesting a role of SSRIs as adjunctive therapy in PWH.

Pharmacological and Behavioral Interventions to Mitigate Premature Aging in Patients with HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We sought to review pharmacological and behavioral interventions that have been publicly presented, published, or are currently ongoing to prevent or mitigate the effect of premature HIV-associated comorbidities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies have been conducted in hopes of finding an effective intervention. While the choice of antiretroviral regimen influences recovery of immune function, several drugs used as adjunct treatments have proven effective to mitigate premature aging. Additionally, few behavioral interventions have exhibited some efficacy. Statins, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and anti-hyperglycemic agents as well as optimal adherence, exercise, and intermittent fasting among others have had beneficial impact on markers of immune activation and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. However, several investigations had inconclusive outcomes so further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

An open label randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin versus aspirin in elite controllers and antiretroviral-treated people with HIV

BACKGROUND

Residual inflammation in people with HIV (PWH) despite suppression of HIV replication is associated with many comorbidities including cardiovascular disease. Targeting inflammation may decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

An open label randomized study was conducted to evaluate the effect of nine months of 81 mg aspirin versus 40 mg atorvastatin in antiretroviral therapy (ART) treated PWH and elite controllers (EC), not on ART. Biomarkers associated with inflammation and virologic indices were measured and analyzed using nonparametric and linear mixed effect models.

RESULTS

Fifty-three participants were randomized and 44 were included in the final analysis. Median age was 54 years, 72% were male, 59% were Black. Median CD4 + count was 595 cells/μl in the aspirin and 717 cells/μl in the atorvastatin arm. After 9 months of treatment, plasma soluble (s) CD14 + was reduced in the aspirin group within both treated PWH and EC ( P  = 0.0229), yet only within treated PWH in the atorvastatin group ( P  = 0.0128). A 2.3% reduction from baseline in tissue factor levels was also observed in the aspirin arm, driven by the EC group. In the atorvastatin arm, there was a 4.3% reduction in interleukin-8 levels ( P  = 0.02) and a small decrease of activated CD4 + T cells ( P  < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the plasma HIV viral load and cell-associated (CA) HIV DNA and RNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin and atorvastatin could play a role in targeting HIV-associated inflammation. Elite controllers may warrant special consideration for anti-inflammatory strategies.

Impact of switching to raltegravir and/or adding losartan in lymphoid tissue fibrosis and inflammation in people living with HIV. A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Persistent inflammation and immune activation are associated with lymph node fibrosis and end-organ diseases in treatment-suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH). We investigated the effect of switching to raltegravir and/or adding losartan on lymphoid tissue fibrosis and on the inflammatory/immune-activation mediators in treated HIV patients.

METHODS

Chronic HIV-infected patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (2NRTI) and one non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) during at least 48 weeks were randomized to four groups (n = 48): 2NRTI + efavirenz (EFV), 2NRTI + EFV + losartan, 2NRTI + raltegravir and 2NRTI + raltegravir + losartan for 48 weeks. Tonsillar biopsy and peripheral blood markers of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte activation and senescence, monocyte activation and soluble markers of inflammation were determined at baseline and at week 48 and compared between groups.

RESULTS

No changes in lymphoid tissue architecture were observed. Adding losartan had no impact on lymphocyte subsets. Conversely, patients who switched to raltegravir showed a higher decrease in all activated [CD4+CD38+HLA-DR+, -0.3 vs. 0.48 (P = 0.033); CD8+CD38+ HLA-DR+, -1.6 vs. 1.3 (P = 0.02)] and senescent [CD4+CD28-CD57+, -0.3 vs. 0.26 (P = 0.04); CD8+CD28-CD57+, -6.1 vs. 3.8 (P = 0.002)] T lymphocytes. In addition, the median CD4/CD8 ratio increased by 0.35 in patients in the raltegravir group vs. 0.03 in the other arms (P = 0.002). Differences between groups in monocyte subpopulations or soluble inflammation markers were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan had no effect on lymphoid fibrosis or immune activation/inflammation. Conversely, switching to a regimen with raltegravir significantly decreased activated and senescent T-lymphocyte subpopulations and increased CD4/CD8 ratio in successfully treated PLWH.

Losartan to reduce inflammation and fibrosis endpoints in HIV disease

BACKGROUND

Persistent inflammation and incomplete immune recovery among persons with HIV (PHIV) are associated with increased disease risk. We hypothesized that the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) losartan would reduce inflammation by mitigating nuclear factor (NF)κB responses and promote T-cell recovery via inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ)-mediated fibrosis.

METHODS

Losartan (100 mg) versus placebo over 12 months was investigated in a randomized (1 : 1) placebo-controlled trial, among PHIV age at least 50 years, receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), with HIV RNA less than 200 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count 600 cells/μl or less. Inflammation, fibrosis and myocardial biomarkers were measured in blood using ELISA, electrochemiluminescence and immunoturbidimetric methods, and T-cell and monocyte phenotypes were assessed with flow cytometry among a subset of participants. Changes over follow-up in (log-2 transformed) biomarkers and cell phenotypes (untransformed) were compared between losartan and placebo arms using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Among 108 PHIV (n = 52 to losartan; n = 56 to placebo), 97% had a month 12 visit. Median age was 57 years and baseline CD4+ cell count was 408 cells/μl. Losartan treatment was not associated with an improvement in interleukin-6 levels, or other blood measures of inflammation, immune activation, fibrosis activity or myocardial function. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells also did not differ by treatment group. Losartan reduced SBP and DBP by 6 and 5 mmHg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among older PHIV with viral suppression, losartan did not improve blood measures of inflammation nor T-cell immune recovery. Losartan treatment is unlikely to reduce inflammation associated comorbidities to a clinically meaningful degree, beyond the benefits from lowering blood pressure.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT02049307.

Residual immune dysfunction under antiretroviral therapy

The usage of combination antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV (PWH) has incited profound improvement in morbidity and mortality. Yet, PWH may not experience full restoration of immune function which can manifest with non-AIDS comorbidities that frequently associate with residual inflammation and can imperil quality of life or longevity. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis underlying chronic inflammation and residual immune dysfunction in PWH, as well as potential therapeutic interventions to ameliorate them and prevent incidence or progression of non-AIDS comorbidities. Current evidence advocates that early diagnosis and prompt initiation of therapy at high CD4 counts may represent the best available approach for an improved immune recovery in PWH.

Impact of HIV infection on aging and immune status

Introduction: Thanks to antiretroviral therapy (ART), persons living with HIV (PLWH), have a longer life expectancy. However, immune activation and inflammation remain elevated, even after viral suppression, and contribute to morbidity and mortality in these individuals.Areas covered: We review aspects related to immune activation and inflammation in PLWH, their consequences, and the potential strategies to reduce immune activation in HIV-infected individuals on ART.Expert opinion: When addressing a problem, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the topic. This is the main limitation faced when dealing with immune activation and inflammation in PLWH since there is no consensus on the ideal markers to evaluate immune activation or inflammation. To date, the different interventions that have addressed this problem by targeting specific mediators have not been able to significantly reduce immune activation or its consequences. Given that there is currently no curative intervention for HIV infection, more studies are necessary to understand the mechanism underlying immune activation and help to identify potential therapeutic targets that contribute to improving the life expectancy of HIV-infected individuals.

Harnessing CD8+ T Cells Under HIV Antiretroviral Therapy

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed HIV from a fatal disease to a chronic condition. In recent years there has been considerable interest in strategies to enable HIV-infected individuals to cease ART without viral rebound, either by purging all cells infected harboring replication-competent virus (HIV eradication), or by boosting immune responses to allow durable suppression of virus without rebound (HIV remission). Both of these approaches may need to harness HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells to eliminate infected cells and/or prevent viral spread. In untreated infection, both HIV-specific and total CD8⁺ T cells are dysfunctional. Here, we review our current understanding of both global and HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cell immunity in HIV-infected individuals with durably suppressed viral load under ART, and its implications for HIV cure, eradication or remission. Overall, the literature indicates significant normalization of global T cell parameters, including CD4/8 ratio, activation status, and telomere length. Global characteristics of CD8⁺ T cells from HIV⁺ART⁺ individuals align more closely with those of HIV-seronegative individuals than of viremic HIV-infected individuals. However, markers of senescence remain elevated, leading to the hypothesis that immune aging is accelerated in HIV-infected individuals on ART. This phenomenon could have implications for attempts to prime de novo, or boost existing HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses. A major challenge for both HIV cure and remission strategies is to elicit HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cell responses superior to that elicited by natural infection in terms of response kinetics, magnitude, breadth, viral suppressive capacity, and tissue localization. Addressing these issues will be critical to the success of HIV cure and remission attempts.

Visualizing the Immune System: Providing Key Insights into HIV/SIV Infections

Immunological inductive tissues, such as secondary lymphoid organs, are composed of distinct anatomical microenvironments for the generation of immune responses to pathogens and immunogens. These microenvironments are characterized by the compartmentalization of highly specialized immune and stromal cell populations, as well as the presence of a complex network of soluble factors and chemokines that direct the intra-tissue trafficking of naïve and effector cell populations. Imaging platforms have provided critical contextual information regarding the molecular and cellular interactions that orchestrate the spatial microanatomy of relevant cells and the development of immune responses against pathogens. Particularly in HIV/SIV disease, imaging technologies are of great importance in the investigation of the local interplay between the virus and host cells, with respect to understanding viral dynamics and persistence, immune responses (i.e., adaptive and innate inflammatory responses), tissue structure and pathologies, and changes to the surrounding milieu and function of immune cells. Merging imaging platforms with other cutting-edge technologies could lead to novel findings regarding the phenotype, function, and molecular signatures of particular immune cell targets, further promoting the development of new antiviral treatments and vaccination strategies.