Choice of sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is monitored anesthesia care as safe as general anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Assessing Sedation Depth with PSI in Elderly ERCP Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Adequate sedation is important for elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patient state index (PSI) via the SedLine® system has been utilized for real-time monitoring of anesthesia depth in surgical patients. We aimed to assess the correlation between PSI and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 57 elderly patients scheduled for ERCP procedures. Patients received target-controlled infusion of propofol, titrated to the sedation level of MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2. The MOAA/S scores and PSI values were recorded during sedation and recovery. We also documented procedure and recovery time, oversedation (PSI < 25 for at least 10 min and EEG burst suppression), adverse events, and fatigue scores (0-10, higher scores indicating more fatigue).

Results

All patients completed this study (mean age of 73 years and 63% male), with a mean procedure time of 53 min and recovery time of 37 min. Five patients (8.8%) experienced PSI < 25 for at least 10 min, and three of them (5.3%) showed EEG burst suppression. No patients developed desaturation or intra-procedural awareness. Hypotension and abdominal pain were uncommon. Nine patients (15.8%) experienced mild dizziness or nausea. The median (IQR) fatigue score was 3 (2-4) at recovery room discharge. A significant correlation was observed between the MOAA/S scores and PSI values (Spearman correlation coefficient ρ = 0.742, P < 0.001). When patients were at the MOAA/S scores of 1 and 2, the median PSI was 50 (95% CI: 48 to 52).

Conclusion

PSI provides a useful and real-time monitoring of sedation for elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Our results showed a significant correlation between the PSI values and MOAA/S scores and suggested a PSI value of 50 with a range of 48 to 52 for maintaining adequate sedation.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400079859).

Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation of Cancer Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Study

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a primary diagnostic and therapeutic option for pancreaticobiliary pathologies.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus propofol during ERCP in cancer patients.

Methods

This randomized controlled single-blinded trial was conducted with 202 cancer patients aged 21 to 60 years, of both sexes, with a body mass index of 18.5 to 30 kg/m2, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II - III, who were undergoing ERCP. The patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups. The Propofol Group (n = 101) received a loading dose of propofol (1 - 2 mg/kg over 30 seconds) followed by an infusion (0.05 - 0.1 mg/kg/hour). The Dexmedetomidine Group (n = 101) received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 minutes) followed by an infusion (0.2 - 0.7 μg/kg/hour). The maintenance dose was adjusted during the procedure based on vital signs, Bispectral Index (BIS), and oxygen saturation.

Results

The Dexmedetomidine group showed a significantly lower incidence of intra-procedural hypoxemic events (14.9% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.037) and a comparable incidence of hypotension (17.8% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.441). Dexmedetomidine also demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative pain scores according to the Facial Pain Score (P < 0.05), significantly lower postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores (P < 0.05), and a lower frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) compared to the Propofol group. Additionally, there was a significantly higher frequency of endoscopist satisfaction in the Dexmedetomidine group compared to the Propofol group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine can be used as a safe and effective alternative to propofol for deep sedation of cancer patients undergoing ERCP. It is associated with a lower incidence of hypoxemic events, effective intraoperative sedation, quicker recovery, and superior analgesic effects both intraoperatively and postoperatively compared to propofol.

The 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam for inhibiting responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope during ERCP

BACKGROUND

Compared to midazolam, remimazolam has a faster onset and offset of hypnotic effect, as well as cardiorespiratory stability, this study aims to determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam to inhibit responses to insertion of a duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

A dose-response study was carried out undergoing ERCP who received remimazolam-alfentanil anesthesia using 10 µg/kg of alfentanil between September 2021 and November 2021. The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.2 mg/kg. The dose was then decided based on the responses of earlier patients by exploiting the sequential ascend and descend according to a 9: 1 biased coin design. Upon failure, the dose of remimazolam was increased by 0.025 mg/kg in the next patient. When the insertion was successful, the succeeding patient was randomized to an identical dose or a dose that was lower by 0.025 mg/kg.The ED90 of remimazolam for inhibiting responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope during ERCP was calculated. Adverse events and complications of remimazolam were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 55 elderly patients (age > 65) were included in the study. 45 successfully anesthetized patients, and 10 unsuccessfully. The ED90 of remimazolam was 0.300 mg/kg (95% CI = 0.287-0.320). ED95 was 0.315 (95% CI = 0.312-0.323) and ED99 was 0.323 (95% CI = 0.323-0.325). Among the patients, 9 patients developed hypotension, 2 patients developed bradycardia and 1 patient developed tachycardia, and hypoxia occurred in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A loading dose of 0.300 mg / kg of remimazolam for elderly patients undergoing ERCP can safely, effectively, and quickly induce patients to fall asleep and inhibit responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered at the website ClinicalTrials.gov on 22/09/2021(NCT05053763).

Comparing sedation protocols for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A retrospective study

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Effective sedation is crucial to enhance patient comfort and optimize endoscopist performance. Various sedation protocols, including Propofol and Dexmedetomidine (Pro-Dex), Ketamine and Propofol (Keto-Fol), Propofol and Midazolam (Pro-Mid), and Propofol alone, have been utilized during ERCP. This retrospective study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these four sedation protocols.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients who underwent ERCP between 2018 and 2021, with each patient receiving one of the four sedation protocols. Protocol assignment was based on the endoscopist's preference. Data on hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, recovery time, and procedure-related complications were collected.

Results

Baseline data showed no significant differences among the groups pre-procedure. The Pro-Dex group exhibited significantly lower mean total propofol dose, shorter recovery time, and faster achievement of Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score 3-4 compared to the other groups. The Pro-group demonstrated significantly longer hospital stay than the other three groups (median, 4.19 ± 1.1 vs. 3.48 ± 1.2 days in the KP groups, p = 0.042). There were no significant variations in the incidence of respiratory depression, hypotension, or bradycardia among the four groups. Additionally, notable trends were found for hemodynamic measures, total propofol dosage, time to reach the desired level of sedation (as measured by the Ramsay Sedation Scale), and hospital stay based on BMI categories, indicating that higher BMI is linked to more serious outcomes.

Conclusion

Our retrospective study demonstrates that the Pro-Dex protocol offers superior sedation quality, faster recovery, and fewer complications compared to the other protocols during ERCP. However, the incidence of ERCP-related adverse events did not significantly differ among the four sedation protocols. These findings can aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate sedation protocol for ERCP, considering patient and endoscopist preferences.

Safety and efficacy of remifentanil-propofol combination on "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of a "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia using a combination of remifentanil and propofol, compared to propofol-based monitored anesthesia care and conventional general anesthesia during therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

From September to December 2019, 360 patients scheduled for elective ERCP at the Endoscopy Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were randomly assigned to three different groups: Group MAC (propofol-based monitored anesthesia care, n=120), Group GA1 (general anesthesia with neuromuscular blocking agents, n=120), or Group GA2 (remifentanil-propofol combination-based muscle relaxant-free general anesthesia, n=120).

RESULTS

The results showed that there was a significant difference in intraprocedural cardiopulmonary adverse events among the three groups (Group MAC, 37.5%; Group GA1, 19.2%; Group GA2, 17.5%; P < 0.001). Total time (from patient entry into the Endoscopy Center to departure) and room time (from patient entry into the endoscopy suit to departure) were shorter in Group GA2 and Group MAC compared to Group GA1 (P < 0.001). Additionally, endoscopist satisfaction levels were significantly higher in Group GA1 and Group GA2 compared to Group MAC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study found that administering propofol-remifentanil combination for "muscle relaxant-free" general anesthesia during therapeutic ERCP was safe and effective. This approach offered greater safety and endoscopist satisfaction than propofol-based monitored anesthesia care, as well as shorter total time and room time than conventional general anesthesia.