Efficacy and safety of roxadustat in the treatment of renal allograft anemia patients: a case series

Daprodustat for Post-Transplant Anemia in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Daprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, has been reported to be effective in treating conservative renal failure and renal anemia in patients undergoing dialysis. However, its effects on post-transplant anemia have not yet been reported. This study aimed to determine whether daprodustat may be a useful treatment for post-transplant anemia.

MATERIALS

Excluding 5 cases in which the drug was discontinued due to side effects, 21 post-transplant patients treated with daprodustat for ≥12 months and available for follow-up were analyzed. Changes in hemoglobin levels, iron metabolism, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and low-density lipoprotein levels were evaluated over 1 year.

RESULTS

The average hemoglobin level was 10.1 g/dL before treatment, and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, these had increased significantly to 10.9, 11.2, 11.9, 12.3, 12.3, and 12.6, respectively. Ferritin levels were significantly lower throughout the 12-month study period. Transferrin saturation was significantly lower than before treatment during the first 6 months, with no significant differences after that. The participants' estimated glomerular filtration rate and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels did not change significantly throughout the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Daprodustat significantly increased hemoglobin levels was easily dose-adjusted and was relatively safe for continuous use over 1 year. It was also effective in patients who had responded inadequately to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Therefore, we conclude that daprodustat may be a useful treatment for post-transplant anemia.

Risk factors and current state of therapy for anemia after kidney transplantation

Post-transplant anemia is one of the most common complications in kidney transplant recipients, severely affecting patient prognosis and quality of life, and is an independent predictor of graft kidney loss and patient mortality. However, our clinical understanding and the attention given to post-transplant anemia are currently insufficient. This paper reviews the current status, risk factors, and therapeutic progress in anemia after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients. We recommend that clinical staff pay attention to anemia and its complications in kidney transplant recipients and intervene early for anemia.

Treatment Options for Anemia in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Review

Anemia is common after kidney transplantation. The etiology may be multifactorial, such as causes of anemia in the general population and causes that are unique to the kidney transplant setting. Posttransplant anemia, particularly when severe, may be associated with adverse effects such as graft failure, mortality, and a decline in kidney function. After careful investigation, that is, having excluded or treated reversible causes of anemia, treatment of anemia in patients with a kidney transplant is based on iron supplementation or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), although there are no specific guidelines on anemia management in this patient population. Iron therapy is often needed, but optimal and safe iron-deficiency management strategies remain to be defined. Evidence suggests that ESAs are safe and potentially associated with favorable outcomes. Better graft function has been reported with ESA use targeting hemoglobin levels higher than those recommended in the general population with chronic kidney disease and with no apparent increased risk of cardiovascular events. These results require further investigation. Data on the use of hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitors are limited. Prevention and treatment of anemia in kidney transplantation can improve patients' quality of life, life expectancy, allograft function, and survival.

The current therapeutic approach for anaemia after kidney transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anaemia after kidney transplantation is a common finding with no uniform management guideline. Most approaches are derived from the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. Recent advances for the treatment of anaemia in patients with CKD/End stage renal disease include hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHi), a novel class of oral erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs). We present relevant studies of HIF-PHi in the transplant population and its implications on the management of posttransplant anaemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data on HIF-PHi use in the kidney transplant population are promising. Limited data demonstrate a significant increase in haemoglobin, with a comparable safety profile to epoetin. Reported adverse effects include overcorrection and low iron stores.

SUMMARY

Current therapeutic approaches to anaemia in the kidney transplant population is mostly derived from the CKD population. More studies are needed on HIF-Phi, a novel class of ESAs that has thus far demonstrated promise in the kidney transplant population.

Evolving Strategies in the Treatment of Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 10% of the worldwide population; anaemia is a frequent complication. Inadequate erythropoietin production and absolute or functional iron deficiency are the major causes. Accordingly, the current treatment is based on iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Available therapy has dramatically improved the management of anaemia and the quality of life. However, safety concerns were raised over ESA use, especially when aiming to reach near-to-normal haemoglobin levels with high doses. Moreover, many patients show hypo-responsiveness to ESA. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) were developed for the oral treatment of anaemia in CKD to overcome these concerns. They simulate the body's exposure to moderate hypoxia, stimulating the production of endogenous erythropoietin. Some molecules are already approved for clinical use in some countries. Data from clinical trials showed non-inferiority in anaemia correction compared to ESA or superiority for placebo. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors may also have additional advantages in inflamed patients, improving iron utilisation and mobilisation and decreasing LDL-cholesterol. Overall, non-inferiority was also shown in major cardiovascular events, except for one molecule in the non-dialysis population. This was an unexpected finding, considering the lower erythropoietin levels reached using these drugs due to their peculiar mechanism of action. More data and longer follow-ups are necessary to better clarifying safety issues and further investigate the variety of pathways activated by HIF, which could have either positive or negative effects and could differentiate HIF-PHIs from ESAs.

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Prolyl Hydroxyl Domain Inhibitors: From Theoretical Superiority to Clinical Noninferiority Compared with Current ESAs?

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease; it is mainly treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron. Experimental studies extensively investigated the mechanisms involved in the body's response to hypoxia and led to the discovery of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway and the enzymes regulating its function. HIF-prolyl-hydroxyl domain (PHD) inhibitors are a new class of oral drugs developed to treat anemia in chronic kidney disease. By inhibiting the function of PHD enzymes, they mimic the exposure to moderate hypoxia and stimulate the production of endogenous erythropoietin and very likely increase iron availability. Some data also suggest that their efficacy and, consequently, dose needs are less influenced by inflammation than ESAs. Overall, data from phases 2 and 3 clinical development showed efficacy in anemia correction and maintenance for all of the class molecules compared with placebo (superiority) or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (noninferiority). Three molecules, roxadustat, vadadustat, and daprodustat, underwent extensive clinical investigation to assess their safety on hard cardiovascular end points, mortality, and special interest events (including cancer and thrombosis). Aside from vadadustat in the nondialysis population, at the prespecified primary analyses, all three molecules met the noninferiority margin for the risk of major cardiovascular events compared with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or placebo. The reason for this discrepancy is difficult to explain. Other safety signals came from secondary analyses of some of the other randomized clinical trials, including a higher incidence of thrombosis. A more extensive clinical experience with post-marketing data on hard safety issues is needed to define better when and how to use HIF-PHD inhibitors compared with already available ESAs.

Roxadustat: Not just for anemia

Roxadustat is a recently approved hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that has demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy in the treatment of renal anemia. Recent studies found it also has potential for the treatment of other hypoxia-related diseases. Although clinical studies have not yet found significant adverse or off-target effects of roxadustat, clinicians must be vigilant about these possible effects. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates the expression of many genes and physiological processes in response to a decreased level of oxygen, but its role in the pathogenesis of different diseases is complex and controversial. In addition to increasing the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor, roxadustat also has some effects that may be HIF-independent, indicating some potential off-target effects. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics of roxadustat, its current status in the treatment of renal anemia, and its possible effects on other pathological mechanisms.