Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer

Can preoperative percutaneous injection of ultrasound contrast agent locate sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer?

Objectives

We evaluated the ability and accuracy of preoperative identification and localization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) using intradermal injection of ultrasound contrast agent.

Materials and methods

Prospectively recruited 191 early breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). All participants received intradermal injection of microbubble contrast agent. Following the identification and localization of SLNs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), Markers were deployed in the SLNs US-guided. Subsequently, the SLNs with Markers were stained and marked with a suspension of nano-carbon US-guided to assist in intraoperative localization of SLNs. Standard SLNB with methylene blue tracing was performed intraoperatively to assess the consistency between the two methods of SLNs localization, thereby determining the ability and accuracy of CEUS in identifying and localizing SLNs.

Results

A total of 179 patients were included in the final evaluation analysis, in which a microbubble contrast agent was injected subcutaneously in the areolar region. A total of 201 SLNs were identified, with a median of 1 SLN per patient. Each SLN was identified in 157 patients, and two SLNs were identified in 22 patients. Among the 201 SLNs from the 179 patients, the proportion that could be individually matched between CEUS and the blue dye method was 95.5% (192/201), and the consistency evaluation in SLNs identification between CEUS and blue dye staining was excellent (Kappa value = 0.62, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The consistency of identification and localization of SLNs in early breast cancer patients between CEUS and the blue dye method was strong.

Comparative aspects of targeted sentinel lymph node mapping in veterinary and human medicine: opportunities for future research

There is a significant overlap in the genetic, metabolic and epigenetic alterations between human and companion animal cancers, including those of the oral cavity, breast, bladder, skin, lungs and pancreas. In many cancer types, the identification and removal of affected lymph nodes are essential for accurate cancer management, including treatment and prognosis. Historically, lymphadenectomy and subsequent radical resection based on regional anatomy, palpation and lymph node aspirates were considered sufficient; however, modern approaches with sentinel lymph node mapping (SLN) mapping have increased the accuracy of surgical decision-making. Preoperative and intraoperative SLN mapping techniques in veterinary patients parallel those used in human medicine. While many of these techniques are highly successful, the main challenges with current methodologies are their sensitivity and specificity for the presence of cancer, which can be overcome via precision medicine and targeted SLN mapping agents. Given the large population of dogs and cats with cancer, the crossover of knowledge between species can help to deepen our understanding of many of these cancers and can be useful in evaluating new drugs and/or therapies. In this review, we discuss SLN mapping techniques in veterinary medicine and the concept of precision medicine as it relates to targeted SLN mapping imaging agents. The large number of companion animals affected by cancer is an underutilized resource to bridge the translational gap and we aim to provide a reference for the use of dogs and cats as a comparative model for human SLN mapping.

The Value of Percutaneous Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Sentinel Lymph Node Identification, Metastatic Status and Burden Diagnosis in Early Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (PCEUS) in the identification and characterization of sentinel lymph node (SLN).

METHODS

A total of 102 breast cancer patients were collected and underwent preoperative PCEUS, which was used to identify SLN and lymphatic drainage. SLNs were classified into 4 enhancement patterns, including 6 subtypes: homogeneous (I), featured inhomogeneous (II) including inhomogeneous hypoenhancement (IIa) and annular or semi-annular enhancement (IIb), focal filling defect (III) including filling defect area < 50% (IIIa) and filling defect area ≥ 50% (IIIb), and no enhancement (IV). The enhancement patterns of SLNs were compared with the final pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The identification rate of SLNs using PCEUS was 100% (102/102); the rate of identification of LCs was 100% (102/102), and the coincidence rate was 98.0% (100/102). Four lymphatic drainage patterns (LDPs) including 5 subtypes were found: single LC/single SLN(74.5%), multiple LCs/ single SLN (13.7%) including 2 subtypes:2 LCs/1 SLN and 3 LCs/1 SLN, single LC/multiple SLNs (7.8%), and multiple LCs/multiple SLNs (3.9%). A total of 86.3% (44/51) of patients without axillary metastasis could be safely selected for types I, IIa, and IIb, while the axillary metastasis rates of types III and IV were 74.4% and 87.5%, respectively (P < .001). Compared with grayscale US, the PCEUS significant improvement in diagnosing metastatic SLNs (.794 versus .579, P < .001). For the SLN metastatic burden, Types I, IIa, IIb, and IIIa had ≤2 SLNs metastases, with a pathological coincidence rate of (64/67, 95.5%), and types IIIb and IV had >2 SLNs metastases, with a pathological coincidence rate of (25/35, 71.4%) (P < .001). The AUC of PCEUS for the diagnosis of SLN metastatic status and burden was .794 and .879, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

PCEUS has a high identification rate for SLN and has good potential for diagnosing SLN metastatic status and burden by enhancement patterns.

A review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® and Sonazoid™ in non-hepatic organs

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a dependable modality for the diagnosis of various clinical conditions. A judicious selection of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) is imperative for optimizing imaging and improving diagnosis. Approved UCAs for imaging the majority of organs include SonoVue, a pure blood agent, and Sonazoid, which exhibits an additional Kupffer phase. Despite the fact that the two UCAs are increasingly being employed, there is a lack of comparative reviews between the two agents in different organs diseases. This review represents the first attempt to compare the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, primarily including breast, thyroid, pancreas, and spleen diseases. Through comparative analysis, this review provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the performance characteristics of SonoVue and Sonazoid, with the aim of offering valuable guidance for the clinical application of CEUS. Overall, further clinical evidences are required to compare and contrast the dissimilarities between the two UCAs in non-hepatic organs, enabling clinicians to make an appropriate selection based on actual clinical applications.

Lymphatic Mapping with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Surgery: How We Do It

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective surgery for the treatment of lymphedema in the extremities. Indocyanine green lymphography is the reference standard for visualizing lymphatics for LVA surgery, but it has several limitations; most notably, superficial dermal congestion can mask deeper lymphatic vessels. To overcome the limitations, we add contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography. We have previously reported that CEUS lymphography can identify lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery that indocyanine green lymphography does not. Here, we describe how we perform CEUS lymphography, including workflow, technique, and documentation. Before informed consent, the patient must be screened for possible adverse reactions to microbubbles. The procedure involves multiple intradermal injections of the microbubble agent at various sites along the extremity. After each injection, imaging for microbubble uptake by lymphatic vessels is performed using an ultrasound scanner with contrast-specific software. We use sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (Lumason/SonoVue; Bracco Suisse SA), but we are investigating the performance of other Food & Drug Administration-approved microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography. Having a systematic approach to marking the skin can mitigate the hindrance of marking over ultrasound coupling gel. Another benefit of CEUS lymphography is the rapid identification of neighboring veins compatible in size and location for anastomosis. We hold regular scheduled multidisciplinary meetings for coordination of care, discussion of outcomes, quality assurance, and ongoing innovation.