Impact of hypertension on short- and long-term survival of patients who underwent emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection

Factors Associated with Early Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection-A Single-Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) is a surgical emergency with relevant mortality and morbidity despite improvements in current management protocols. Identifying patients at risk of a fatal outcome and controlling the factors associated with mortality remain of paramount importance.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the medical records of 117 patients with AADA, who were referred to our centre and operated on between 2005 and 2021. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analysed and tested for their correlation with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 83%. Preoperatively, factors associated with mortality were age (p = 0.02), chronic hypertension (p = 0.02), any grade of aortic valve stenosis in the patient's medical history (p = 0.03), atrial fibrillation (p = 0.04), and oral anticoagulation (p = 0.04). Non-survivors had significantly longer operative times (p = 0.002). During the postoperative phase, mortality was strongly associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) (p < 0.001), acute heart failure (p < 0.001), stroke (p = 0.02), focal neurological deficits (p = 0.02), and sepsis (p = 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, the onset of postoperative focal neurological deficits was the best predictor of a fatal outcome after adjusting for ARDS (odds ratio: 5.8, 95%-CI: 1.2-41.7, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation, hypertension, and age were significantly correlated with mortality. Postoperatively, acute kidney injury, acute heart failure, sepsis, and focal neurological deficits were correlated with in-hospital mortality, and focal neurological deficit has been identified as a significant predictor of fatal outcomes. Early detection and interdisciplinary management of at-risk patients remain crucial throughout the postoperative phase.

Analysis of serum calcium change trajectories and prognostic factors in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between serum calcium changes and short-term prognosis of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection surgery at Fujian Heart Medical Center between June 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were enrolled. According to the changing track of serum calcium in patients after acute type A aortic dissection, three potential category tracks were determined: high-level (n = 85), medium-level (n = 259), and continuous low-level groups (n = 39). Using the medium-level group as the control, regression analysis showed that poor prognosis risk was increased in the group with continuous low serum calcium (odds ratio = 2.454, P < 0.05) and in the group with continuous low serum calcium > 48 h (odds ratio = 3.595, P < 0.05). Age (odds ratio = 1.063, P < 0.001), body mass index (odds ratio = 1.138, P < 0.05), hypertension (odds ratio = 3.697, P < 0.05), and the highest lactic acid within 72 h after surgery(odds ratio = 1.093, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis after aortic dissection.

CONCLUSION

Continuous low serum calcium was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Testing and Rehabilitation for Aortic Dissection Patients: A SCOPING REVIEW

OBJECTIVE

Although physical exercise has established benefits for long-term cardiovascular health, concern regarding further aortic events has limited the evidence for exercise among aortic dissection (AD) patients. The objective was to perform a scoping review of the current concepts and gaps in the literature regarding the benefit and safety of cardiovascular testing and rehabilitation among post-AD patients.

REVIEW METHODS

A scoping review of the literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Eligibility criteria included any studies with AD in relation to exercise rehabilitation or testing and physical or mental health. Electronic databases were queried for relevant studies (last queried, November 1, 2021).

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included with a total of 381 patients with AD, all of whom underwent surgical intervention. Study heterogeneity prevented data synthesis and a formal systematic review, although four dominant themes emerged: cardiovascular-related outcomes, aorta-related outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and serious adverse events. Patients with AD have reduced baseline physical capacity and QoL. Rehabilitation programs may increase both physical status and QoL. Rates of serious adverse rates are minimal yet poorly defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of apparent benefits from cardiovascular testing and rehabilitation for patients with AD who have undergone intervention, this scoping review highlights the need for increased comparative research specific to exercise among patients with AD and outcomes such as mortality and reinterventions.

Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components are Associated with In-Hospital Complications after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore whether and to what extent metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components are associated with in-hospital complications in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 684 patients who had undergone TEVAR. Demographic and clinical data were collected and subgroup analysis, mixed-model regression analysis, scoring systems, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 684 inpatients were assigned to the poor outcome (n = 90) or no complications (n = 594) group. Compared to the no complications group, the poor outcome group had a higher incidence of MetS (44 [48.9%] vs. 120 [20.2%], P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, in-hospital complications were present in 3.1%, 6.6%, 11.9%, 20.7%, 40.0%, and 62.5% of patients in the 6 groups who met the 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 MetS diagnostic criteria, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, hypertension (odds ratio [OR]: 2.680; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.571-4.570), type 2 diabetes (OR: 2.135; 95% CI: 1.192-3.824), quartiles of body mass index (OR: 1.801; 95% CI: 1.415-2.291), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR: 0.763; 95% CI: 0.611-0.953), and systolic blood pressure (OR: 1.894; 95% CI: 1.486-2.413) were independent factors for in-hospital complications after adjustment for other risk factors. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, MetS was an independent risk factor for in-hospital complications. We established a scoring system for each component and the area under the ROC curve was 0.664 (95% CI: 0.618-0.710) in all patients, 0.672 (95% CI: 0.595-0.749) in patients with MetS, and 0.610 (95% CI: 0.552-0.667) in patients without MetS, as determined by ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MetS, especially the blood pressure component, confers a greater risk of in-hospital complications in patients with acute type B aortic dissection after TEVAR.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection in dialysis patients: lessons learned from a single-center’s experience

There is a paucity of data describing the safety and efficacy of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair surgeries in dialysis patients. Our study aimed to investigated the influence of dialysis on early and late outcomes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who received repair surgery for ATAAD. A total of 882 ATAAD patients who received emergency aortic dissection repair at our center from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively screened in this study and divided into the dialysis group (n = 16) and the non-dialysis group (n = 866), depending on whether they required dialysis for preoperative ESRD. No significant difference of age, preoperative hemodynamics, organ ischemia conditions, operative variables as well as the 30-Day mortality and in-hospital complications was discovered between two groups. However, the survival rates and the proportion of late aortic event (sudden death and reoperation) free population at 1 and 3 years after surgery were significantly decreased in dialysis patients compared to non-dialysis patients. Our study indicated that the short-term surgical outcomes of ATAAD in dialysis patients were comparable to non-dialysis patient. However, the dialysis patients were associated with a worse long-term prognosis.