Implications of the updated Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS version 1.1) for lung cancer screening

Assessment of Lung Nodule Detection and Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System Classification Using Zero Echo Time Pulmonary MRI

BACKGROUND

The detection rate of lung nodules has increased considerably with CT as the primary method of examination, and the repeated CT examinations at 3 months, 6 months or annually, based on nodule characteristics, have increased the radiation exposure of patients. So, it is urgent to explore a radiation-free MRI examination method that can effectively address the challenges posed by low proton density and magnetic field inhomogeneities.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of zero echo time (ZTE) MRI in lung nodule detection and lung CT screening reporting and data system (lung-RADS) classification, and to explore the value of ZTE-MRI in the assessment of lung nodules.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

54 patients, including 21 men and 33 women.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Chest CT using a 16-slice scanner and ZTE-MRI at 3.0T based on fast gradient echo.

ASSESSMENT

Nodule type (ground-glass nodules, part-solid nodules, and solid nodules), lung-RADS classification, and nodule diameter (manual measurement) on CT and ZTE-MRI images were recorded.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The percent of concordant cases, Kappa value, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman's correlation, and Bland-Altman. The p-value <0.05 is considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients (age, 54.8 ± 11.9 years; 21 men) with 63 nodules were enrolled. Compared with CT, the total nodule detection rate of ZTE-MRI was 85.7%. The intermodality agreement of ZTE-MRI and CT lung nodules type evaluation was substantial (Kappa = 0.761), and the intermodality agreement of ZTE-MRI and CT lung-RADS classification was moderate (Kappa = 0.592). The diameter measurements between ZTE-MRI and CT showed no significant difference and demonstrated a high degree of interobserver (ICC = 0.997-0.999) and intermodality (ICC = 0.956-0.985) agreements.

DATA CONCLUSION

The measurement of nodule diameter by pulmonary ZTE-MRI is similar to that by CT, but the ability of lung-RADS to classify nodes from MRI images still requires further research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Standalone deep learning versus experts for diagnosis lung cancer on chest computed tomography: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of standalone deep learning (DL) algorithms and human experts in lung cancer detection on chest computed tomography (CT) scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study searched for studies on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception until November 2023. We focused on adult lung cancer patients and compared the efficacy of DL algorithms and expert radiologists in disease diagnosis on CT scans. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2, QUADAS-C, and CLAIM. Bivariate random-effects and subgroup analyses were performed for tasks (malignancy classification vs invasiveness classification), imaging modalities (CT vs low-dose CT [LDCT] vs high-resolution CT), study region, software used, and publication year.

RESULTS

We included 20 studies on various aspects of lung cancer diagnosis on CT scans. Quantitatively, DL algorithms exhibited superior sensitivity (82%) and specificity (75%) compared to human experts (sensitivity 81%, specificity 69%). However, the difference in specificity was statistically significant, whereas the difference in sensitivity was not statistically significant. The DL algorithms' performance varied across different imaging modalities and tasks, demonstrating the need for tailored optimization of DL algorithms. Notably, DL algorithms matched experts in sensitivity on standard CT, surpassing them in specificity, but showed higher sensitivity with lower specificity on LDCT scans.

CONCLUSION

DL algorithms demonstrated improved accuracy over human readers in malignancy and invasiveness classification on CT scans. However, their performance varies by imaging modality, underlining the importance of continued research to fully assess DL algorithms' diagnostic effectiveness in lung cancer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DL algorithms have the potential to refine lung cancer diagnosis on CT, matching human sensitivity and surpassing in specificity. These findings call for further DL optimization across imaging modalities, aiming to advance clinical diagnostics and patient outcomes.

KEY POINTS

Lung cancer diagnosis by CT is challenging and can be improved with AI integration. DL shows higher accuracy in lung cancer detection on CT than human experts. Enhanced DL accuracy could lead to improved lung cancer diagnosis and outcomes.

Facing an un-met need in lung cancer screening: The never smokers

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the second most common cancer in both men and women. In addition to smoking, other risk factors, such as environmental tobacco smoke, air pollution, biomass combustion, radon gas, occupational exposure, lung disease, family history of cancer, geographic variability, and genetic factors, play an essential role in developing LC. Current screening guidelines and eligibility criteria have limited efficacy in identifying LC cases (50 %), as most screening programs primarily target subjects with a smoking history as the leading risk factor. Implementing LC screening programs in people who have never smoked (PNS) can significantly impact cancer-specific survival and early disease detection. However, the available evidence regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of such programs is limited. Therefore, further research on LC screening in PNS is warranted to determine the necessary techniques for accurately identifying individuals who should be included in screening programs.

Tumour-pleura relationship on computed tomography (CT) provides effective risk stratification for peripheral pulmonary nodules with Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) score of 4X

Background

Pulmonary nodules with Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 4X are of greater clinical significance, and accurate differentiation of pathological types and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) of Lung-RADS 4X peripheral pulmonary nodules before treatment can aid in stratification. This study set out to investigate whether the tumour-pleura relationship on computed tomography (CT) can provide effective risk stratification for peripheral pulmonary nodules with Lung-RADS 4X.

Methods

This was a single institution, retrospective study of 482 consecutive patients with Lung-RADS score 4X, who were pathologically diagnosed with tuberculous granuloma and adenocarcinoma from January 2019 to December 2023. We assessed clinical factors (baseline characteristics and tumour markers) and CT findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the classification of pulmonary nodules and predictors of VPI.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that gender [odds ratio (OR) =0.392; P<0.001], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (OR =8.331; P<0.001), type of nodules (OR =13.551 and 7.478; P<0.001 and P=0.016) and maximum base width of soft tissue component on the pleura side (OR =0.857; P=0.005) were significant independent factors for distinguishing tuberculous granuloma from adenocarcinoma. And the type of linear connection between lesion and pleura (OR =3.936; P<0.001), and the maximum base width of soft tissue components on the pleura side (OR =1.359; P=0.001) were correlated independently with VPI. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting pulmonary nodules classification was 82.60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 78.85-86.35%), and the AUC for predicting VPI was 76.10% (95% CI: 69.83-82.38%).

Conclusions

The tumour-pleura relationship will be helpful in further risk stratification for peripheral pulmonary nodules with a score of Lung-RADS 4X.

Artificial intelligence-based graded training of pulmonary nodules for junior radiology residents and medical imaging students

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis system in the pulmonary nodule detection and diagnosis training of junior radiology residents and medical imaging students.

METHODS

The participants were divided into three groups. Medical imaging students of Grade 2020 in the Jinzhou Medical University were randomly divided into Groups 1 and 2; Group 3 comprised junior radiology residents. Group 1 used the traditional case-based teaching mode; Groups 2 and 3 used the 'AI intelligent assisted diagnosis system' teaching mode. All participants performed localisation, grading and qualitative diagnosed of 1,057 lung nodules in 420 cases for seven rounds of testing after training. The sensitivity and number of false positive nodules in different densities (solid, pure ground glass, mixed ground glass and calcification), sizes (less than 5 mm, 5-10 mm and over 10 mm) and positions (subpleural, peripheral and central) of the pulmonary nodules in the three groups were detected. The pathological results and diagnostic opinions of radiologists formed the criteria. The detection rate, diagnostic compliance rate, false positive number/case, and kappa scores of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in baseline test scores between Groups 1 and 2, and there were statistical differences with Group 3 (P = 0.036 and 0.011). The detection rate of solid, pure ground glass and calcified nodules; small-, medium-, and large-diameter nodules; and peripheral nodules were significantly different among the three groups (P<0.05). After seven rounds of training, the diagnostic compliance rate increased in all three groups, with the largest increase in Group 2. The average kappa score increased from 0.508 to 0.704. The average kappa score for Rounds 1-4 and 5-7 were 0.595 and 0.714, respectively. The average kappa scores of Groups 1,2 and 3 increased from 0.478 to 0.658, 0.417 to 0.757, and 0.638 to 0.791, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AI assisted diagnosis system is a valuable tool for training junior radiology residents and medical imaging students to perform pulmonary nodules detection and diagnosis.

Diagnostic utility of adding needle aspiration (using PeriView FLEX needle) to radial endobronchial ultrasound guide sheath transbronchial lung biopsy: a single center retrospective study

Background

Radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) guide sheath (GS) transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) improves the diagnostic yield of peripheral lung lesions (PLL). However, its diagnostic yield is approximately 60%. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of adding rEBUS GS transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) using PeriView FLEX needle (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to rEBUS GS TBLB.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we initially screened 124 PLLs in 123 patients who underwent rEBUS GS procedures for PLLs from December 2020 to August 2021. The analysis was performed on 74 PLLs in 73 patients who underwent both rEBUS GS TBLB and TBNA.

Results

PLLs showed the following characteristics: lesion size [mean ± standard deviation (SD)], 24±12 mm; nature (solid vs. subsolid), 59 (79.7%) vs. 15 (20.3%); distance from the pleura (mean ± SD), 14±14 mm; rEBUS visualization type (probe within PLL vs. probe adjacent to PLL), 56 (75.7%) vs. 18 (24.3%). Among 74 PLLs, 47 (63.5%) were successfully diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBLB. In 27 PLLs not diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBLB, 5 (18.5%) were further diagnosed by rEBUS GS TBNA [overall diagnostic yield: 70.3% (52/74)]. EBUS visualization type of "probe adjacent to PLL" was a significant factor associated with the diagnostic yield of additional rEBUS GS TBNA.

Conclusions

In rEBUS GS procedures for PLLs, the diagnostic yield might be improved by implementing TBNA in addition to TBLB. In particular, additional TBNA is preferable if the probe is adjacent to the lesion rather than within the lesion on rEBUS.

Influence of CT dose reduction on AI-driven malignancy estimation of incidental pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of dose reduction on a commercially available lung cancer prediction convolutional neuronal network (LCP-CNN).

METHODS

CT scans from a cohort provided by the local lung cancer center (n = 218) with confirmed pulmonary malignancies and their corresponding reduced dose simulations (25% and 5% dose) were subjected to the LCP-CNN. The resulting LCP scores (scale 1-10, increasing malignancy risk) and the proportion of correctly classified nodules were compared. The cohort was divided into a low-, medium-, and high-risk group based on the respective LCP scores; shifts between the groups were studied to evaluate the potential impact on nodule management. Two different malignancy risk score thresholds were analyzed: a higher threshold of ≥ 9 ("rule-in" approach) and a lower threshold of > 4 ("rule-out" approach).

RESULTS

In total, 169 patients with 196 nodules could be included (mean age ± SD, 64.5 ± 9.2 year; 49% females). Mean LCP scores for original, 25% and 5% dose levels were 8.5 ± 1.7, 8.4 ± 1.7 (p > 0.05 vs. original dose) and 8.2 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05 vs. original dose), respectively. The proportion of correctly classified nodules with the "rule-in" approach decreased with simulated dose reduction from 58.2 to 56.1% (p = 0.34) and to 52.0% for the respective dose levels (p = 0.01). For the "rule-out" approach the respective values were 95.9%, 96.4%, and 94.4% (p = 0.12). When reducing the original dose to 25%/5%, eight/twenty-two nodules shifted to a lower, five/seven nodules to a higher malignancy risk group.

CONCLUSION

CT dose reduction may affect the analyzed LCP-CNN regarding the classification of pulmonary malignancies and potentially alter pulmonary nodule management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Utilization of a "rule-out" approach with a lower malignancy risk threshold prevents underestimation of the nodule malignancy risk for the analyzed software, especially in high-risk cohorts.

KEY POINTS

• LCP-CNN may be affected by CT image parameters such as noise resulting from low-dose CT acquisitions. • CT dose reduction can alter pulmonary nodule management recommendations by affecting the outcome of the LCP-CNN. • Utilization of a lower malignancy risk threshold prevents underestimation of pulmonary malignancies in high-risk cohorts.

ACR Lung-RADS v2022: Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations

The ACR created the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) in 2014 to standardize the reporting and management of screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Lung-RADS was updated to version 1.1 in 2019 and revised size thresholds for nonsolid nodules, added classification criteria for perifissural nodules, and allowed for short-interval follow-up of rapidly enlarging nodules that may be infectious in etiology. Lung-RADS v2022, released in November 2022, provides several updates including guidance on the classification and management of atypical pulmonary cysts, juxtapleural nodules, airway-centered nodules, and potentially infectious findings. This new release also provides clarification for determining nodule growth and introduces stepped management for nodules that are stable or decreasing in size. This article summarizes the current evidence and expert consensus supporting Lung-RADS v2022.

ACR Lung-RADS v2022: Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations

The American College of Radiology created the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) in 2014 to standardize the reporting and management of screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Lung-RADS was updated to version 1.1 in 2019 and revised size thresholds for nonsolid nodules, added classification criteria for perifissural nodules, and allowed for short-interval follow-up of rapidly enlarging nodules that may be infectious in etiology. Lung-RADS v2022, released in November 2022, provides several updates including guidance on the classification and management of atypical pulmonary cysts, juxtapleural nodules, airway-centered nodules, and potentially infectious findings. This new release also provides clarification for determining nodule growth and introduces stepped management for nodules that are stable or decreasing in size. This article summarizes the current evidence and expert consensus supporting Lung-RADS v2022.

The differential computed tomography features between small benign and malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules with different sizes

Background

Computed tomography (CT) has been widely known to be the first choice for the diagnosis of solid solitary pulmonary nodules (SSPNs). However, the smaller the SSPN is, the less the differential CT signs between benign and malignant SSPNs there are, which brings great challenges to their diagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differential CT features between small (≤15 mm) benign and malignant SSPNs with different sizes.

Methods

From May 2018 to November 2021, CT data of 794 patients with small SSPNs (≤15 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. SSPNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and each group was further classified into three cohorts: cohort I (diameter ≤6 mm), cohort II (6 mm < diameter ≤8 mm), and cohort III (8 mm < diameter ≤15 mm). The differential CT features of benign and malignant SSPNs in three cohorts were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors of benign SSPNs.

Results

In cohort I, polygonal shape and upper-lobe distribution differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05) and multiparametric analysis showed polygonal shape [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 12.165; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.512-97.872; P=0.019] was the most effective variation for predicting benign SSPNs, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.640-0.855; P=0.001). In cohort II, polygonal shape, lobulation, pleural retraction, and air bronchogram differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05), and polygonal shape (OR: 8.870; 95% CI: 1.096-71.772; P=0.041) and the absence of pleural retraction (OR: 0.306; 95% CI: 0.106-0.883; P=0.028) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.694-0.863; P<0.001). In cohort III, 12 CT features showed significant differences between groups (all P<0.05) and polygonal shape (OR: 3.953; 95% CI: 1.508-10.361; P=0.005); calcification (OR: 3.710; 95% CI: 1.305-10.551; P=0.014); halo sign (OR: 6.237; 95% CI: 2.838-13.710; P<0.001); satellite lesions (OR: 6.554; 95% CI: 3.225-13.318; P<0.001); and the absence of lobulation (OR: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.026-0.167; P<0.001), air space (OR: 0.405; 95% CI: 0.215-0.764; P=0.005), pleural retraction (OR: 0.297; 95% CI: 0.179-0.493; P<0.001), bronchial truncation (OR: 0.165; 95% CI: 0.090-0.303; P<0.001), and air bronchogram (OR: 0.363; 95% CI: 0.208-0.633; P<0.001) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.840-0.897; P<0.001).

Conclusions

CT features vary between SSPNs with different sizes. Clarifying the differential CT features based on different diameter ranges may help to minimize ambiguities and discriminate the benign SSPNs from malignant ones.

Comparison of different classification systems for pulmonary nodules: a multicenter retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

To compare the diagnostic performance of Lung-RADS (lung imaging-reporting and data system) 2022 and PNI-GARS (pulmonary node imaging-grading and reporting system).

METHODS

Pulmonary nodules (PNs) were selected at four centers, namely, CQ Center (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021), HB Center (January 1, 2021-June 30, 2022), SC Center (September 1, 2021-December 31, 2021), and SX Center (January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021). PNs were divided into solid nodules (SNs), partial solid nodules (PSNs) and ground-glass nodules (GGNs), and they were then classified by the Lung-RADS and PNI-GARS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement rate were compared between the two systems by the χ2 test.

RESULTS

For SN and PSN, the sensitivity of PNI-GARS and Lung-RADS was close (SN 99.8% vs. 99.4%, P < 0.001; PSN 99.9% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.015), but the specificity (SN 51.2% > 35.1%, PSN 13.3% > 5.7%, all P < 0.001) and agreement rate (SN 81.1% > 74.5%, P < 0.001, PSN 94.6% > 92.7%, all P < 0.05) of PNI-GARS were superior to those of Lung-RADS. For GGN, the sensitivity (96.5%) and agreement rate (88.6%) of PNI-GARS were better than those of Lung-RADS (0, 18.5%, P < 0.001). For the whole sample, the sensitivity (98.5%) and agreement rate (87.0%) of PNI-GARS were better than Lung-RADS (57.5%, 56.5%, all P < 0.001), whereas the specificity was slightly lower (49.8% < 53.4%, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

PNI-GARS was superior to Lung-RADS in diagnostic performance, especially for GGN.

Ex-vivo 1.5T MR Imaging versus CT in Estimating the Size of the Pathologically Invasive Component of Lung Adenocarcinoma Spectrum Lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ex-vivo MRI enables accurate estimation of the invasive component of lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lung lobectomy. The specimens underwent MRI at 1.5T. The boundary between the lesion and the normal lung was evaluated on a 5-point scale in each three MRI sequences, and a one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc tests were performed. The invasive component size was measured histopathologically. The maximum diameter of each solid component measured on CT and MR T1-weighted (T1W) images and the maximum size obtained from histopathologic images were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

T1W images were determined to be optimal for the delineation of the lesions (P < 0.001). The histopathologic invasive area corresponded to the area where the T1W ex-vivo MR image showed a high signal intensity that was almost equal to the intravascular blood signal. The maximum diameter of the solid component on CT was overestimated compared with the maximum invasive size on histopathology (mean, 153%; P < 0.05), while that on MRI was evaluated mostly accurately without overestimation (mean, 108%; P = 0.48). The interobserver reliability of the measurements using CT and MRI was good (ICC = 0.71 on CT, 0.74 on MRI).

CONCLUSION

Ex-vivo MRI was more accurate than conventional CT in delineating the invasive component of lung adenocarcinoma.

"Will I change nodule management recommendations if I change my CAD system?"-impact of volumetric deviation between different CAD systems on lesion management

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the measurement accuracy of two different computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems regarding artificial pulmonary nodules and assess the clinical impact of volumetric inaccuracies in a phantom study.

METHODS

In this phantom study, 59 different phantom arrangements with 326 artificial nodules (178 solid, 148 ground-glass) were scanned at 80 kV, 100 kV, and 120 kV. Four different nodule diameters were used: 5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. Scans were analyzed by a deep-learning (DL)-based CAD and a standard CAD system. Relative volumetric errors (RVE) of each system vs. ground truth and the relative volume difference (RVD) DL-based vs. standard CAD were calculated. The Bland-Altman method was used to define the limits of agreement (LOA). The hypothetical impact on LungRADS classification was assessed for both systems.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the three voltage groups regarding nodule volumetry. Regarding the solid nodules, the RVE of the 5-mm-, 8-mm-, 10-mm-, and 12-mm-size groups for the DL CAD/standard CAD were 12.2/2.8%, 1.3/ - 2.8%, - 3.6/1.5%, and - 12.2/ - 0.3%, respectively. The corresponding values for the ground-glass nodules (GGN) were 25.6%/81.0%, 9.0%/28.0%, 7.6/20.6%, and 6.8/21.2%. The mean RVD for solid nodules/GGN was 1.3/ - 15.2%. Regarding the LungRADS classification, 88.5% and 79.8% of all solid nodules were correctly assigned by the DL CAD and the standard CAD, respectively. 14.9% of the nodules were assigned differently between the systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient management may be affected by the volumetric inaccuracy of the CAD systems and hence demands supervision and/or manual correction by a radiologist.

KEY POINTS

• The DL-based CAD system was more accurate in the volumetry of GGN and less accurate regarding solid nodules than the standard CAD system. • Nodule size and attenuation have an effect on the measurement accuracy of both systems; tube voltage has no effect on measurement accuracy. • Measurement inaccuracies of CAD systems can have an impact on patient management, which demands supervision by radiologists.

Proposal of Modified Lung-RADS in Assessing Pulmonary Nodules of Patients with Previous Malignancies: A Primary Study

BACKGROUND

In addition to the diameters of pulmonary nodules, the number and morphology of blood vessels in pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) were closely related to the occurrence of lung cancer. Moreover, the benign and malignant signs of nodules were also valuable for the identification of nodules. Based on these two points, we tried to revise Lung-RADS 2022 and proposed our Modified Lung-RADS. The aim of the study was to verify the diagnostic performance of Modified Lung-RADS for pulmonary solid nodules (SNs) and pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) in patients with previous malignancies.

METHODS

The chest CT and clinical data of patients with prior cancer who underwent pulmonary nodulectomies from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2021 were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 240 patients with 293 pulmonary nodules were included in this study. In contrast with the original version, the risk classification of pGGNs based on the GGN-vascular relationships (GVRs), and the SNs without burrs and with benign signs, could be downgraded to category 2. The sensitivity, specificity, and agreement rate of the original Lung-RADS 2022 and Modified Lung-RADS for pGGNs and SNs were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the original version, the sensitivity and agreement rate of the Modified version for pGGNs increased from 0 and 23.33% to 97.10% and 92.22%, respectively, while the specificity decreased from 100% to 76.19%. As regards SNs, the specificity and agreement rate of the Modified version increased from 44.44% to 75.00% (p < 0.05) and 88.67% to 94.09% (p = 0.052), respectively, while the sensitivity was unchanged (98.20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the diagnostic efficiency of Modified Lung-RADS was superior to that of the original version, and Modified Lung-RADS could be a preliminary attempt to improve Lung-RADS 2022.

Initial low-dose computed tomography screening results and summary of participant characteristics: based on the latest Chinese guideline

Background

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been promoted as a promising screening strategy for early detection of lung cancer. China released the latest lung cancer screening guideline in 2021. The compliance of the individuals who received LDCT for lung cancer screening with the guideline is unknown yet. It is necessary to summarize the distribution of guideline-defined lung cancer-related risk factors in the Chinese population so as to inform the selection of target population for the future lung cancer screening.

Methods

A single-center, cross-sectional study design was adopted. All participants were individuals who underwent LDCT at a tertiary teaching hospital in Hunan, China, between 1 January and 31 December 2021. LDCT results were derived along with guideline-based characteristics for descriptive analysis.

Results

A total of 5,486 participants were included. Over one-quarter (1,426, 26.0%) of the participants who received screening did not meet the guideline-defined high-risk population, even among non-smokers (36.4%). Most of the participants (4,622, 84.3%) were found to have lung nodules, while no clinical intervention was required basically. The detection rate of positive nodules varied from 46.8% to 71.2% when using different cut-off values for positive nodules. Among non-smoking women, ground glass opacity appeared to be more significantly common compared with non-smoking men (26.7% vs. 21.8%).

Conclusion

Over one-quarter of individuals who received LDCT screening did not meet the guideline-defined high-risk populations. Appropriate cut-off values for positive nodules need to be continuously explored. More precise and localized criteria for high-risk individuals are needed, especially for non-smoking women.

MRI Compared with Low-Dose CT for Incidental Lung Nodule Detection in COPD: A Multicenter Trial

Purpose

To investigate morphofunctional chest MRI for the detection and management of incidental pulmonary nodules in participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study, 567 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 9 [SD]; 340 men) underwent same-day contrast-enhanced MRI and nonenhanced low-dose CT (LDCT) in a nationwide multicenter trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01245933). Nodule dimensions, morphologic features, and Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) category were assessed at MRI by two blinded radiologists, and consensual LDCT results served as the reference standard. Comparisons were performed using the Student t test, and agreements were assessed using the Cohen weighted κ.

Results

A total of 525 nodules larger than 3 mm in diameter were detected at LDCT in 178 participants, with a mean diameter of 7.2 mm ± 6.1 (range, 3.1-63.1 mm). Nodules were not detected in the remaining 389 participants. Sensitivity and positive predictive values with MRI for readers 1 and 2, respectively, were 63.0% and 84.8% and 60.2% and 83.9% for solid nodules (n = 495), 17.6% and 75.0% and 17.6% and 60.0% for part-solid nodules (n = 17), and 7.7% and 100% and 7.7% and 50.0% for ground-glass nodules (n = 13). For nodules 6 mm or greater in diameter, sensitivity and positive predictive values were 73.3% and 92.2% for reader 1 and 71.4% and 93.2% for reader 2, respectively. Readers underestimated the long-axis diameter at MRI by 0.5 mm ± 1.7 (reader 1) and 0.5 mm ± 1.5 (reader 2) compared with LDCT (P < .001). For Lung-RADS categorization per nodule using MRI, there was substantial to perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.75-1.00) and intermethod agreement compared with LDCT (κ = 0.70-1.00 and 0.69-1.00).

Conclusion

In a multicenter setting, morphofunctional MRI showed moderate sensitivity for detection of incidental pulmonary nodules in participants with COPD but high agreement with LDCT for Lung-RADS classification of nodules.Clinical trial registration no. NCT01245933 and NCT02629432Keywords: MRI, CT, Thorax, Lung, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Screening© RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Detection and size quantification of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose versus regular-dose CT: a comparative study in COPD patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate detectability and semi-automatic diameter and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules in ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) vs regular-dose CT (RDCT).

METHODS

Fifty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) underwent RDCT on 64-multidetector CT (120 kV, filtered back projection), and ULDCT on third-generation dual source CT (100 kV with tin filter, advanced modeled iterative reconstruction). One radiologist evaluated the presence of nodules on both scans in random order, with discrepancies judged by two independent radiologists and consensus reading. Sensitivity of nodule detection on RDCT and ULDCT was compared to reader consensus. Systematic error in semi-automatically derived diameter and volume, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were evaluated. Nodule classification was compared by κ statistics.

RESULTS

ULDCT resulted in 83.1% (95% CI: 81.0-85.2) dose reduction compared to RDCT (p < 0.001). 45 nodules were present, with diameter range 4.0-25.3 mm and volume range 16.0-4483.0 mm³. Detection sensitivity was non-significant (p = 0.503) between RDCT 88.8% (95% CI: 76.0-96.3) and ULDCT 95.5% (95% CI: 84.9-99.5). No systematic bias in diameter measurements (median difference: -0.2 mm) or volumetry (median difference: -6 mm³) was found for ULDCT compared to RDCT. The 95% LoA for diameter and volume measurements were ±3.0 mm and ±33.5%, respectively. κ value for nodule classification was 0.852 for diameter measurements and 0.930 for volumetry.

CONCLUSION

ULDCT based on Sn100 kV enables comparable detectability of solid pulmonary nodules in COPD patients, at 83% reduced radiation dose compared to RDCT, without relevant difference in nodule measurement and size classification.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Pulmonary nodule detectability and measurements in ULDCT are comparable to RDCT.

[Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) in Radiology: Strengths, Weaknesses and Improvement]

In 2019, the American College of Radiology announced Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS) 1.1 to reduce lung cancer false positivity compared to that of Lung-RADS 1.0 for effective national lung cancer screening, and in December 2022, announced the new Lung-RADS 1.1, Lung-RADS^® 2022 improvement. The Lung-RADS^® 2022 measures the nodule size to the first decimal place compared to that of the Lung-RADS 1.0, to category 2 until the juxtapleural nodule size is < 10 mm, increases the size criterion of the ground glass nodule to 30 mm in category 2, and changes categories 4B and 4X to extremely suspicious. The category was divided according to the airway nodules location and shape or wall thickness of atypical pulmonary cysts. Herein, to help radiologists understand the Lung-RADS^® 2022, this review will describe its advantages, disadvantages, and future improvements.

Lung cancer screening in primary care

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the evidence supporting low-dose CT to screen for lung cancer, and the risks, costs, and challenges of implementing broad-based screening for eligible patients. Increased familiarity with lung cancer screening guidelines by primary care and specialty clinicians presents an opportunity to improve lung cancer screening rates and to save lives from the most common cause of cancer death in the United States.

3D matting: A benchmark study on soft segmentation method for pulmonary nodules applied in computed tomography

Usually, lesions are not isolated but are associated with the surrounding tissues. For example, the growth of a tumour can depend on or infiltrate into the surrounding tissues. Due to the pathological nature of the lesions, it is challenging to distinguish their boundaries in medical imaging. However, these uncertain regions may contain diagnostic information. Therefore, the simple binarization of lesions by traditional binary segmentation can result in the loss of diagnostic information. In this work, we introduce the image matting into the 3D scenes and use the alpha matte, i.e., a soft mask, to describe lesions in a 3D medical image. The traditional soft mask acted as a training trick to compensate for the easily mislabelled or under-labelled ambiguous regions. In contrast, 3D matting uses soft segmentation to characterize the uncertain regions more finely, which means that it retains more structural information for subsequent diagnosis and treatment. The current study of image matting methods in 3D is limited. To address this issue, we conduct a comprehensive study of 3D matting, including both traditional and deep-learning-based methods. We adapt four state-of-the-art 2D image matting algorithms to 3D scenes and further customize the methods for CT images to calibrate the alpha matte with the radiodensity. Moreover, we propose the first end-to-end deep 3D matting network and implement a solid 3D medical image matting benchmark. Its efficient counterparts are also proposed to achieve a good performance-computation balance. Furthermore, there is no high-quality annotated dataset related to 3D matting, slowing down the development of data-driven deep-learning-based methods. To address this issue, we construct the first 3D medical matting dataset. The validity of the dataset was verified through clinicians' assessments and downstream experiments. The dataset and codes will be released to encourage further research.1.

Preoperative Brain Tumor Imaging: Models and Software for Segmentation and Standardized Reporting

For patients suffering from brain tumor, prognosis estimation and treatment decisions are made by a multidisciplinary team based on a set of preoperative MR scans. Currently, the lack of standardized and automatic methods for tumor detection and generation of clinical reports, incorporating a wide range of tumor characteristics, represents a major hurdle. In this study, we investigate the most occurring brain tumor types: glioblastomas, lower grade gliomas, meningiomas, and metastases, through four cohorts of up to 4,000 patients. Tumor segmentation models were trained using the AGU-Net architecture with different preprocessing steps and protocols. Segmentation performances were assessed in-depth using a wide-range of voxel and patient-wise metrics covering volume, distance, and probabilistic aspects. Finally, two software solutions have been developed, enabling an easy use of the trained models and standardized generation of clinical reports: Raidionics and Raidionics-Slicer. Segmentation performances were quite homogeneous across the four different brain tumor types, with an average true positive Dice ranging between 80 and 90%, patient-wise recall between 88 and 98%, and patient-wise precision around 95%. In conjunction to Dice, the identified most relevant other metrics were the relative absolute volume difference, the variation of information, and the Hausdorff, Mahalanobis, and object average symmetric surface distances. With our Raidionics software, running on a desktop computer with CPU support, tumor segmentation can be performed in 16-54 s depending on the dimensions of the MRI volume. For the generation of a standardized clinical report, including the tumor segmentation and features computation, 5-15 min are necessary. All trained models have been made open-access together with the source code for both software solutions and validation metrics computation. In the future, a method to convert results from a set of metrics into a final single score would be highly desirable for easier ranking across trained models. In addition, an automatic classification of the brain tumor type would be necessary to replace manual user input. Finally, the inclusion of post-operative segmentation in both software solutions will be key for generating complete post-operative standardized clinical reports.

Incidental findings on lung cancer screening: pictorial essay and systematic checklist

Lung cancer screening (LCS) programs are increasing worldwide. Incidental findings (IFs) on LCS are defined as low-dose CT findings unrelated to the primary purpose of identifying lung cancer. Most IFs on LCS are benign and clinically insignificant but are being increasingly recognized, and some require urgent referral for further diagnostic workup. Other findings are expected and are known as smoking-related comorbidities, including COPD, cardiovascular disease, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease, and their diagnosis can have a significant impact on patient prognosis. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to illustrate the most common IFs on LCS, organized by organ. We will discuss the current literature on IFs on LCS, focusing on their prevalence, appropriate communication, and triggering of clinical pathway systems.

Trends in Imaging Patterns of Bronchogenic Carcinoma: Reality or a Statistical Variation? A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Analysis of Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Bronchogenic carcinoma accounts for more cancer-related deaths than any other malignancy and is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world. Bronchogenic carcinoma is by far the leading cause of cancer death among both men and women, making up almost 25% of all cancer deaths. The objective of this study was to identify the changing trends, if any, in radiological patterns of bronchogenic carcinoma to document the various computed tomography (CT) appearances of bronchogenic carcinoma with histopathologic correlation.

METHODS

This was a single-center cross-sectional study on 162 patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of bronchogenic carcinoma with histopathological confirmation of diagnosis.

RESULTS

There was a male preponderance with bronchogenic carcinoma and smoking being the most common risk factor. Squamous cell carcinoma followed by adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype. Squamous cell carcinoma was noted to be present predominantly in the peripheral location (55.5%), and adenocarcinoma was noted to be present predominantly in the central location (68.4%).

CONCLUSION

CT is the imaging modality of choice for evaluating bronchogenic carcinoma and provides for precise characterization of the size, extent, and staging of the carcinoma. Among 162 bronchogenic carcinoma cases evaluated in the current study, a definite changing trend in the radiological pattern of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was observed. Squamous cell carcinoma was predominantly noted to be a peripheral tumor, and adenocarcinoma is predominantly noted to be a central tumor. Surveillance or restaging scans are recommended, considering the high mortality rate in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma.

Efficacy of Ultrashort Echo Time Pulmonary MRI for Lung Nodule Detection and Lung-RADS Classification

Background Pulmonary MRI with ultrashort echo time (UTE) has been compared with chest CT for nodule detection and classification. However, direct comparisons of these methods' capabilities for Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) evaluation remain lacking. Purpose To compare the capabilities of pulmonary MRI with UTE with those of standard- or low-dose thin-section CT for Lung-RADS classification. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, standard- and low-dose chest CT (270 mA and 60 mA, respectively) and MRI with UTE were used to examine consecutive participants enrolled between January 2017 and December 2020 who met American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Probability of nodule presence was assessed for all methods with a five-point visual scoring system by two board-certified radiologists. All nodules were then evaluated in terms of their Lung-RADS classification using each method. To compare nodule detection capability of the three methods, consensus for performances was rated by using jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis, and sensitivity was compared by means of the McNemar test. In addition, weighted κ statistics were used to determine the agreement between Lung-RADS classification obtained with each method and the reference standard generated from standard-dose CT evaluated by two radiologists who were not included in the image analysis session. Results A total of 205 participants (mean age: 64 years ± 7 [standard deviation], 106 men) with 1073 nodules were enrolled. Figure of merit (FOM) (P < .001) had significant differences among three modalities (standard-dose CT: FOM = 0.91, low-dose CT: FOM = 0.89, pulmonary MRI with UTE: FOM = 0.94), with no evidence of false-positive findings in participants with all modalities (P > .05). Agreements for Lung-RADS classification between all modalities and the reference standard were almost perfect (standard-dose CT: κ = 0.82, P < .001; low-dose CT: κ = 0.82, P < .001; pulmonary MRI with UTE: κ = 0.82, P < .001). Conclusion In a lung cancer screening population, ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI was comparable to standard- or low-dose CT for Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System classification. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wielpütz in this issue.

Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging-Reporting and Data System: Validation and Performance of the Automated Segmentation Task

For patients with presumed glioblastoma, essential tumor characteristics are determined from preoperative MR images to optimize the treatment strategy. This procedure is time-consuming and subjective, if performed by crude eyeballing or manually. The standardized GSI-RADS aims to provide neurosurgeons with automatic tumor segmentations to extract tumor features rapidly and objectively. In this study, we improved automatic tumor segmentation and compared the agreement with manual raters, describe the technical details of the different components of GSI-RADS, and determined their speed. Two recent neural network architectures were considered for the segmentation task: nnU-Net and AGU-Net. Two preprocessing schemes were introduced to investigate the tradeoff between performance and processing speed. A summarized description of the tumor feature extraction and standardized reporting process is included. The trained architectures for automatic segmentation and the code for computing the standardized report are distributed as open-source and as open-access software. Validation studies were performed on a dataset of 1594 gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI volumes from 13 hospitals and 293 T1-weighted MRI volumes from the BraTS challenge. The glioblastoma tumor core segmentation reached a Dice score slightly below 90%, a patientwise F1-score close to 99%, and a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance slightly below 4.0 mm on average with either architecture and the heavy preprocessing scheme. A patient MRI volume can be segmented in less than one minute, and a standardized report can be generated in up to five minutes. The proposed GSI-RADS software showed robust performance on a large collection of MRI volumes from various hospitals and generated results within a reasonable runtime.

Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging-Reporting and Data System: Standardized Reporting of Tumor Volume, Location, and Resectability Based on Automated Segmentations

Treatment decisions for patients with presumed glioblastoma are based on tumor characteristics available from a preoperative MR scan. Tumor characteristics, including volume, location, and resectability, are often estimated or manually delineated. This process is time consuming and subjective. Hence, comparison across cohorts, trials, or registries are subject to assessment bias. In this study, we propose a standardized Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting and Data System (GSI-RADS) based on an automated method of tumor segmentation that provides standard reports on tumor features that are potentially relevant for glioblastoma surgery. As clinical validation, we determine the agreement in extracted tumor features between the automated method and the current standard of manual segmentations from routine clinical MR scans before treatment. In an observational consecutive cohort of 1596 adult patients with a first time surgery of a glioblastoma from 13 institutions, we segmented gadolinium-enhanced tumor parts both by a human rater and by an automated algorithm. Tumor features were extracted from segmentations of both methods and compared to assess differences, concordance, and equivalence. The laterality, contralateral infiltration, and the laterality indices were in excellent agreement. The native and normalized tumor volumes had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Multifocality, but not the number of foci, had good agreement and equivalence. The location profiles of cortical and subcortical structures were in excellent agreement. The expected residual tumor volumes and resectability indices had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Tumor probability maps were in good agreement. In conclusion, automated segmentations are in excellent agreement with manual segmentations and practically equivalent regarding tumor features that are potentially relevant for neurosurgical purposes. Standard GSI-RADS reports can be generated by open access software.

Contribution of a Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel to the Classification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

RATIONALE

The workup and longitudinal monitoring for subjects presenting with pulmonary nodules is a pressing clinical problem. A blood-based biomarker panel potentially has utility for identifying subjects at higher risk for harboring a malignant nodule for whom additional workup would be indicated or subjects at reduced risk for whom imaging-based follow-up would be indicated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether a previously described four-protein biomarker panel, reported to improve assessment of lung cancer risk compared with a smoking-based lung cancer risk model, can provide discrimination between benign and malignant indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

A previously validated multiplex enzyme-linked immunoassay was performed on matched case and control samples from each cohort.

MEASUREMENTS

The biomarker panel was tested in two case-control cohorts of patients presenting with indeterminate pulmonary nodules at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the University of Texas Southwestern.

MAIN RESULTS

In both cohorts, the biomarker panel resulted in improved prediction of lung cancer risk over a model on the basis of nodule size alone. Of particular note, the addition of the marker panel to nodule size greatly improved sensitivity at a high specificity in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

A four-marker biomarker panel, previously validated to improve lung cancer risk prediction, was found to also have utility in distinguishing benign from malignant indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Its performance in improving sensitivity at a high specificity indicates potential utility of the marker panel in assessing likelihood of malignancy in otherwise indeterminate nodules.

Management of Lung Nodules and Lung Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: CHEST Expert Panel Report

Background

The risks from potential exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and resource reallocation that has occurred to combat the pandemic, have altered the balance of benefits and harms that informed current (pre-COVID-19) guideline recommendations for lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. Consensus statements were developed to guide clinicians managing lung cancer screening programs and patients with lung nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods

An expert panel of 24 members, including pulmonologists (n = 17), thoracic radiologists (n = 5), and thoracic surgeons (n = 2), was formed. The panel was provided with an overview of current evidence, summarized by recent guidelines related to lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation. The panel was convened by video teleconference to discuss and then vote on statements related to 12 common clinical scenarios. A predefined threshold of 70% of panel members voting agree or strongly agree was used to determine if there was a consensus for each statement. Items that may influence decisions were listed as notes to be considered for each scenario.

Results

Twelve statements related to baseline and annual lung cancer screening (n = 2), surveillance of a previously detected lung nodule (n = 5), evaluation of intermediate and high-risk lung nodules (n = 4), and management of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (n = 1) were developed and modified. All 12 statements were confirmed as consensus statements according to the voting results. The consensus statements provide guidance about situations in which it was believed to be appropriate to delay screening, defer surveillance imaging of lung nodules, and minimize nonurgent interventions during the evaluation of lung nodules and stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Conclusion

There was consensus that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is appropriate to defer enrollment in lung cancer screening and modify the evaluation of lung nodules due to the added risks from potential exposure and the need for resource reallocation. There are multiple local, regional, and patient-related factors that should be considered when applying these statements to individual patient care.© 2020 RSNA; The American College of Chest Physicians, published by Elsevier Inc; and The American College of Radiology, published by Elsevier Inc.

Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Evidence from 2 Decades of Study

Lung cancer remains the overwhelmingly greatest cause of cancer death in the United States, accounting for more annual deaths than breast, prostate, and colon cancer combined. Accumulated evidence since the mid to late 1990s, however, indicates that low-dose CT screening of high-risk patients enables detection of lung cancer at an early stage and can reduce the risk of dying from lung cancer. CT screening is now a recommended clinical service in the United States, subject to guidelines and reimbursement requirements intended to standardize practice and optimize the balance of benefits and risks. In this review, the evidence on the effectiveness of CT screening will be summarized and the current guidelines and standards will be described in the context of knowledge gained from lung cancer screening studies. In addition, an overview of the potential advances that may improve CT screening will be presented, and the need to better understand the performance in clinical practice outside of the research trial setting will be discussed. © RSNA, 2020.