What is the optimal timing to perform surgical stabilization of rib fractures?

Rib Fixation in Severe Isolated Chest Trauma with Pulmonary Contusion: Rib fixation in pulmonary contusion

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary contusion (PC) is considered a relative contraindication to surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing SSRF vs. non-operative management (NOM).

METHODS

ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 was queried to identify patients with PC and severe chest wall injuries admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital complications. Subgroup analyses stratifying patients according to PC severity and institutional SSRF volume were performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 17,344 were included; 1789 (10.3 %) underwent SSRF, and 15,555 (89.7 %) did not. SSRF was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.68, p < 0.001) but increased ventilator-associated pneumonia, tracheostomy, unplanned ICU admissions, and intubations. It was also associated with increased hospital LOS by 3.46 days (95 % CI: 2.94-3.98) and ICU LOS by 2.33 days (95 % CI: 1.99-2.68). Institutional volume above the median level of 7 SSRF cases was associated with reduced ventilator days by 1.3 days (95 % CI:2.54 to -0.05), hospital LOS by 1.7 days (95 % CI:2.58 to -0.82), and ICU LOS by 1.4 days (95 % CI:2.11 to -0.64), with no significant effects on other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe chest wall injury and PC, SSRF is associated with lower mortality at the expense of longer LOS.

Research on the correlation between rib fracture characteristics and the risk of intrathoracic and intra-abdominal injuries

PURPOSE

Intrathoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in patients with rib fractures are often overlooked, leading to delayed and ineffective treatment. However, the relationship between rib fractures and organ damage has been rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors associated with intrathoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in patients with rib fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 1269 patients diagnosed with rib fractures from September 2020 to April 2023. Patient data were collected, including gender, age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, type of rib fracture, number of fractured ribs, location of the rib fracture, and the presence of thoracic and abdominal organ injuries. Patients without imaging examinations, the patient with rib fractures from iatrogenic causes or mental illnesses or rheumatic immune diseases was excluded. The primary outcomes were intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for these injuries in patients with rib fractures.

RESULTS

The rib fracture characteristics in the occurrence group included bilateral fractures, higher number of fractures (≥3), and fractures located anteriorly, posteriorly, and laterally, as well as greater fracture displacement, compared to the non-occurrence group. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age (p=0.016, odds ratio (OR)=0.95, 95% CI =0.92-0.98), the number of rib fractures (≥3, p=0.001, OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.13-1.89), rib type (bilateral rib fractures, p=0.043, OR=2.63, 95% CI=2.16-3.12), and rib fracture location (lateral rib fractures, p=0.041, OR=2.85, 95% CI=1.31-4.97; posterior rib fractures, p=0.022, OR=3.25, 95% CI=1.46-6.92) were independent risk factors for thoracic and abdominal organ injuries in patients with traumatic rib fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rib fractures resulting from blunt trauma, particularly those with lateral or posterior rib fractures, fractures involving more than 3 ribs, and bilateral rib fractures, are at an increased risk for significant intrathoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. These findings warrant attention and the implementation of appropriate preventive measures during treatment.

Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures in non-ventilated patients: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis using the data from the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGUⓇ)

PURPOSE

Severe thorax trauma including multiple rib fractures and flail chest deformity are leading causes of death in trauma patients. Increasing evidence supports the use of surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) in these patients. However, there is currently a paucity of evidence for its use in non-ventilator-dependent patients.

METHODS

A retrospective propensity-matched analysis of the data of the TraumaRegister DGU® for non-ventilator-dependent patients with severe rib injury (abbreviated injury score ≥ 3) was performed. Subgroup analyses with respect to injury severity score, American society of anaesthesiologists physical status classification and age were performed. Furthermore, the effect of time to surgery was analysed.

REGISTRATION

TR-DGU project ID 2023-007; ClinicalTrials.gov protocol ID: NCT06464289.

RESULTS

SSRF led to reduced mortality compared to conservative treatment (1.6% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.002) and in comparison to the mortality prognosis of the revised injury severity classification II (RISC II) of 5.2%. Interestingly, SSRF was associated with increased length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, higher rates of organ failure and secondary intubation. The patients with organ failure received SSRF later than those without organ failure.

CONCLUSION

Here we report on the largest currently published dataset of non-intubated patients receiving SSRF, which showed reduced mortality in the SSRF cohort. The data indicates that SSRF is a viable treatment option for non-intubated patients. The observed late surgical time points, which may be due to cross over after failed conservative treatment, might be the cause for the observed increased rate of organ failure.

RibMR - A Mixed Reality Visualization System for Rib Fracture Localization in Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Phantom, Preclinical, and Clinical Studies

In surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), the current standard relies on preoperative CT imaging and often incorporates ultrasound (US) imaging. As an alternative, mixed reality (MR) technology holds promise for improving rib fracture localization. This study presents an MR-based visualization system designed for SSRF in a clinical setting. We developed RibMR - a visualization system using an MR head-mounted display that projects a patient-specific 3D hologram onto the patient. RibMR enables the localization of rib fractures in relation to the patient's anatomy. We conducted phantom study using a human mannequin, a preclinical study with two healthy patients, and clinical study with two patients to evaluate RibMR and compared it to US practice. RibMR localized rib fractures with an average accuracy of 0.38 ± 0.21 cm in phantom, 3.75 ± 2.45 cm in preclinical, and 1.47 ± 1.33 cm in clinical studies. RibMR took an average time (minutes) of 4.42 ± 0.98 for the phantom, 8.03 ± 3.67 for the preclinical, and 8.76 ± 0.65 for the clinical studies. Compared to US, RibMR located more fractures, including fractures occluded by other structures, with higher accuracy, faster speed, and improved localization rate. All participating surgeons provided positive feedback regarding accuracy, visualization quality, and usability. RibMR enabled accurate and time-efficient localization of rib fractures and showed better performance compared to US. RibMR is a promising alternative to US for localizing rib fractures in SSRF.

An early analysis of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates for the surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is a viable treatment option for rib fracture patients. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates have become available for SSRF. The objective of this pilot study was to examine the use of PEEK plates for SSRF.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multi-center study of patients undergoing SSRF with PEEK plates from 4/23 through 2/24. Standard indications for SSRF were followed and the decision to use PEEK plates was left to the discretion of the treating surgeon. Basic demographics were obtained. Outcomes included the number of rib fractures stabilized with PEEK plates, complications related to SSRF, and 6-month follow-up with chest computed tomography (CT) to assess healing of PEEK repaired fracture sites, identified as complete or incomplete union. Patients also answered a five-question quality-of-life survey regarding mobility, self-care, usual activities, chest pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Answers were scaled 1 to 5 (1=worse condition possible; 5=best possible condition). Patients rated their health on a scale of 0 to 100 (100=closet to their health preinjury). All data was reported as descriptive.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included. Average age was 57(±16) years; 82.6 % were male. Median ISS was 18 (IQR 14,29) and median chest-AIS was 4 (IQR 3,4). 219 rib fractures were stabilized with PEEK plates. Sixteen (34.8 %) had a combination (PEEK + titanium) procedure. Three patients had a complication: one required a second surgery for additional SSRF, and two patients were readmitted. Twenty-seven patients were surveyed at 6 months, and 19 agreed to CT scan. Eighty PEEK repaired rib fractures were assessed for healing. 80 % of fractures had complete union and no hardware failure. Quality-of-life survey averaged >4.5/category and mean overall health was 89.

CONCLUSION

PEEK plates for SSRF are safe and effective, allowing for adequate rib fracture healing and are associated with positive patient reported outcomes.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures-Does race matter?

BACKGROUND

Advances in medical technology have widened the gaps and exposed disparities in medical treatments. The prevalence of surgical stabilization for rib fractures is rising despite its controversial indications for this treatment modality. In situations of equipoise, surgeons may find themselves choosing patients for surgery, revealing potential implicit biases. We hypothesize that there exists an inequity in surgical stabilization for rib fractures performed based on race.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons 2013-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. Study participants were divided into race groups according to Trauma Quality Improvement Program data registry. To assess the association between race and surgical stabilization for rib fractures, a Poisson regression model was used. Potential confounding adjusted include race, age, sex, highest abbreviated injury severity score in each region, flail chest, sternum fracture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, and comorbidities.

RESULT

Black patients were more often treated at a level 1 trauma center (74%) (P < .001). Flail chest was most common in White (3.2%) and American Indian (3.4%) patients compared with other races (P = .012). After adjusting for potential confounding in the Poisson regression analyses, Black patients were 26% less likely to undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures (adjusted incident rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.74 [0.64-0.85], P < .001) and Asian were 40% less likely to undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures (adjusted incident rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.43-0.81], P = .001) than White patients.

CONCLUSION

There is a disparity in the delivery of surgical stabilization for rib fractures in patients with rib fractures. Black and Asian patients undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures at a significantly lower rate than their White counterparts. This discrepancy in the delivery of care is concerning and requires further study.

National Trend of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Indications, Approaches, and Disparities

INTRODUCTION

Rib fractures are among the most frequent injuries in trauma. This study aims to assess the current nationwide trends in operative rib fixation and identify predictors of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).

METHODS

A 5-y (2017-2021) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Adult trauma patients who had at least one rib fracture were included. We analyzed data regarding type of SSRF including open and thoracoscopic approaches and its trends.

RESULTS

A total of 780,275 patients were identified, of which 15,339 patients (1.9%) were managed with SSRF. Trends of both open and endoscopic approaches were increasing during the study period. Patients with ≤2 rib fractures had a decreasing rate of SSRF. Flail chest (odds ratio = 13.42, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of SSRF.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRF is gaining popularity in the management of chest trauma. The presence of a flail segment and multiplicity of rib fractures is among the predictors of SSRF.

Prognostic factors for outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A review of the literature

Rib fractures are a common injury following blunt thoracic trauma, often resulting in high levels of morbidity and mortality. With the ageing global population, the incidence of rib fractures is expected to increase, posing a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. With advancements in surgical techniques and pioneering research on the topic the use of surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) has increased significantly over the past two decades. However, the relationship between certain prognostic factors and patient outcomes following surgery is still contested and there lacks a consensus on definitive indications for the operation. This literature review presents the current research on SSRF outcomes for; patients with flail chest injuries and multiple-non flail rib fractures, optimal timing between injury and operation, and patient age. This article contributes to the ongoing dialogue surrounding chest wall trauma management and may be drawn upon to aid future research and develop clinical practice guidelines.

The Earlier the Better: Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Associated With Improved Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer respiratory complications. This study sought to evaluate the association between SSRF timing and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients aged ≥45 y who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcome was incidence of ventilator-assisted pneumonia (VAP). Secondary outcomes included acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), unplanned endotracheal intubation, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after all major complications, and FTR after severe respiratory complications. Logistic regression models of outcomes on timing to SSRF were fit while controlling for age, gender, body mass index, injury severity score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking.

RESULTS

Among 4667 patients who received SSRF, average time to SSRF was 4.6 ± 3.2 d. Each additional day to SSRF was associated with increased odds of VAP (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.11) and intubation (OR 1.10, CI 1.08-1.13). A longer time to SSRF was associated with increased odds of ARDS (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15), while no significant association was observed for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.99, CI 0.93-1.04). A longer time to SSRF was associated with decreased odds of FTR after a major complication (OR 0.90, CI 0.83-0.97) and respiratory complications (OR 0.87, CI 0.78-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

For each day that SSRF is delayed, increased odds of VAP, intubation, and ARDS were observed. Prompt intervention is crucial for preventing these complications and improving our ability to rescue patients.

Age-Neutral Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Breaking the Ageism Barrier

INTRODUCTION

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer complications. This study evaluates whether the decision to undergo SSRF is associated with age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status and assesses associated clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients ≥45 y old with rib fractures who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2016 to 2020. Race, ethnicity, and insurance statuses were collected. Age in years was dichotomized into two groups: 45-64 and 65+. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned endotracheal intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after major complications, and FTR after respiratory complications. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes, controlling for gender, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking.

RESULTS

Two thousand eight hundred thirty-nine patients aged 45-64 and 1828 patients aged 65+ underwent SSRF. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was noted between these groups. Analysis showed that the association of SSRF with ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, FTR after a major complication, or FTR after a respiratory complication did not vary by age (P > 0.05). Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.77; P < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; P < 0.001), and Medicaid (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.95; P = 0.005) patients were less likely to receive SSRF.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in clinical outcomes were measured between adults aged 45-64 and ≥65 who underwent SSRF. Older age should not preclude patients from receiving SSRF. Further work is needed to improve underutilization in Black, Hispanic and Medicaid patients.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in anticoagulated patients: Proceed with caution?

BACKGROUND

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is increasingly performed, however the outcome of patients undergoing SSRF while on pre-injury antithrombotic therapy remains unknown. We compared surgical variables and outcomes of patients who were and were not on antithrombotic therapy. We hypothesize pre-injury anticoagulation is associated with delay in SSRF and worse outcomes.

METHODS

For this retrospective cohort study, we queried the Chest Injury International Database, for patients undergoing SSRF between 08/2018 and 03/2022. Antithrombotic therapy was categorized into antiplatelet and anticoagulant use. Primary outcome was time from admission to SSRF. Secondary outcomes included SSRF duration and complications. Numerical data were presented as median (IQR), categorical data as number (%). Inverse probability weighting was used to control for confounding.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen SSRF patients were included, 25 (11 %) were on antithrombotic therapy. These patients were older (72 years, (65-80) versus 57 years, (43-66); p < 0.001) with lower ISS (14, (10-20) versus 21, (14-30); p = 0.002). Time from admission to SSRF was comparable (2 days, (1-4) versus 2 days, (1-4); p = 0.37) as was operative time (154 mins, (120.0-212.0) versus 177 mins, (143.0-210.0); p = 0.34). Patients using antithrombotics had fewer ICU-free days (24 (22-26) versus 28 (23-28); p = 0.003) but more ventilator free days (28, (28-28) versus 27 (27-28); p < 0.008). After adjusting for confounding, pre-injury anticoagulation was not significantly associated with delayed SSRF (Relative Risk, RR=1.37, 95 % CI 0.30-6.24), operative time (RR=1.07, 95 % CI0.88-1.31), IFD <=28 (RR=2.05, 95 %CI:0.33-12.67), VFD<=27 (RR=0.71, 95 %CI:0.15-3.48) or complications (RR=0.55, 95 % CI0.06-5.01).

CONCLUSION

Pre-injury antithrombotic drug use neither delayed SSRF nor impacted operative time in patients requiring SSRF and was not associated with increased risk of complications. Our data suggest SSRF can be safely performed without delay in patients who use anticoagulation pre-injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

STUDY TYPE

Therapeutic/care management.

Treatment of traumatic rib fractures: an overview of current evidence and future perspectives

Operative management of rib fractures has gained significant popularity over the last years, however, it remains a controversial topic, due to the substantial heterogeneity among rib fracture patients with considerable differences in epidemiology. Hence, the present narrative review aims to provide an overview of the treatment and (long-term) outcomes of rib fractures, with an emphasis on the surgical treatment. Nowadays, computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be most practical and sensitive for detecting rib fractures, of which up to 50% is missed on other imaging modalities. Non-operative treatment by patient-tailored multimodal pain management remains the cornerstone. Still, in the presence of-amidst others-chest wall instability or displaced fractures with physiologic derangements, operative treatment is indicated and should be performed within 72 hours after injury. Here, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and pulmonary contusion are no strict contra-indications, while plate osteosynthesis is considered the standard mode for surgical stabilization. To date, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) only benefits selected groups of patients, awaiting results of ongoing studies. Future directions may include the sole use of percutaneous cryoablation of the intercostal nerves as part of conservative management, as well as the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing and use of bio-absorbable materials in the surgical treatment of rib fractures.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures: The impact of volume and the need for standardized indications

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to examine impact of trauma center (TC) surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) volume on outcomes of patients undergoing SSRF.

METHODS

Blunt rib fracture patients who underwent SSRF were included from ACS-TQIP2017-2021. TCs were stratified according to tertiles of SSRF volume:low (LV), middle, and high (HV). Outcomes were time to SSRF, respiratory complications, prolonged ventilator use, mortality.

RESULTS

16,872 patients were identified (LV:5470,HV:5836). Mean age was 56 years, 74% were male, median thorax-AIS was 3. HV centers had a lower proportion of patients with flail chest (HV41% vs LV50%), pulmonary contusion (HV44% vs LV52%) and had shorter time to SSRF(HV58 vs LV76 ​h), less respiratory complications (HV3.2% vs LV4.5%), prolonged ventilator use (HV15% vs LV26%), mortality (HV2% vs LV2.6%) (all p ​< ​0.05). On multivariable regression analysis, HV centers were independently associated with reduced time to SSRF(β ​= ​-18.77,95%CI ​= ​-21.30to-16.25), respiratory complications (OR ​= ​0.67,95%CI ​= ​0.49-0.94), prolonged ventilator use (OR ​= ​0.49,95%CI ​= ​0.41-0.59), but not mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

HV SSRF centers have improved outcomes, however, there are variations in threshold for SSRF and indications must be standardized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

STUDY TYPE

Therapeutic/Care Management.

Time to surgical stabilization of rib fractures: does it impact outcomes?

Objectives

Rib fractures are common, morbid, and potentially lethal. Intuitively, if interventions to mitigate downstream effects of rib fractures can be implemented early, likelihood of developing these complications should be reduced. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is one therapeutic intervention shown to be useful for mitigating complications of these common fractures. Our aim was to investigate for association between time to SSRF and complications among patients with isolated rib fractures undergoing SSRF.

Methods

The 2016-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patient >18 years with isolated thoracic injury undergoing SSRF. Patients were divided into three groups: SSRF ≤2 days, SSRF >2 days but <3 days, and SSRF >3 days. Poisson regression, and adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, was used to evaluate the association between time to SSRF and the primary endpoint, in-hospital complications. Quantile regression was used to evaluate the effects of time to SSRF on the secondary endpoints, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS).

Results

Out of 2185 patients, 918 (42%) underwent SSRF <2 days, 432 (20%) underwent SSRF >2 days but <3 days, and 835 (38%) underwent SSRF >3 days. Hemothorax was more common among patients undergoing SSRF >3 days, otherwise all demographic and clinical variables were similar between groups. After adjusting for potential confounding, SSRF >3 days was associated with a threefold risk of composite in-hospital complications (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 3.15, 95% CI 1.76 to 5.62; p<0.001), a 4-day increase in total hospital LOS (change in median LOS: 4.09; 95% CI 3.69 to 4.49, p<0.001), and a nearly 2-day increase in median ICU LOS (change in median LOS: 1.70; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.08, p<0.001), compared with SSRF ≤2 days.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing SSRF in TQIP, earlier SSRF is associated with less in-hospital complications and shorter hospital stays. Standardization of time to SSRF as a trauma quality metric should be considered.

Level of evidence

Level II, retrospective.

[Specialised Intensive Care Treatment Concepts for Severe Chest Trauma]

This review covers key elements of the critical care management of patients with thoracic trauma. Contrast-enhanced chest computertomography remains the diagnostic modality of choice, as it is more sensitive than conventional chest imaging. Regarding risk stratification, special caution is required in older patients with thoracic trauma given their high risk for posttraumatic complications. In the case of respiratory insufficiency, an attempt of non-invasive ventilation techniques is justified in most patients due to potential treatment benefits. Achieving sufficient pain control is a fundamental goal of critical care management. In this regard, erector-spinae-block and paravertebral block present potentially advantageous alternatives to thoracic epidural anaesthesia. In stable patients, the placement of small-calibre chest tubes may be a beneficial approach compared with large-bore tubes. If surgical stabilization of rib fractures is indicated, it should be done as early as possible.

Association of Early Rib Plating on Clinical and Financial Outcomes: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

With reported improvements in patient outcomes, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been increasingly adopted. While institutional series have sought to define the role of early SSRF, large scale analysis remains lacking. The present study evaluated clinical and financial outcomes of SSRF in a nationally representative cohort.

METHODS

Patients (≥16 years) admitted with multiple rib fractures were identified using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Those who underwent rib plating >14 days following admission were omitted. Using restricted cubic spline analysis, patients who underwent SSRF within 2 days of hospitalization were classified as Expedited while fixation >2 days were deemed Routine. Multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association of operative timing on outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Of 8150 patients meeting final inclusion criteria, 4090 (50.2%) were Expedited. Compared to Routine, Expedited tended to be older but were of comparable race, primary payer, and income quartile. Traumatic mechanism was also similar but rates of concomitant sternal fracture as well as intra-abdominal and cardiac injuries were higher in Routine. After adjustment, Expedited was associated with lower odds of respiratory complications, which included need for mechanical ventilation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and pneumonia, compared to Routine. Expedited was associated with similar hospitalization duration but had lower incremental costs (β: -$19.1 K, 95% CI: -24.1 to -14.2).

DISCUSSION

Early SSRF was associated with lower likelihood of a number of respiratory complications and in-hospital costs. While patient selection criteria may limit our findings, expeditious fixation may limit morbidity while enhancing value of care.

Chest wall injury fracture patterns are associated with different mechanisms of injury: a retrospective review study in the United States

Purpose

Research on rib fracture management has exponentially increased. Predicting fracture patterns based on the mechanism of injury (MOI) and other possible correlations may improve resource allocation and injury prevention strategies. The Chest Injury International Database (CIID) is the largest prospective repository of the operative and nonoperative management of patients with severe chest wall trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the MOI is associated with the resulting rib fracture patterns. We hypothesized that specific MOIs would be associated with distinct rib fracture patterns.

Methods

The CIID was queried to analyze fracture patterns based on the MOI. Patients were stratified by MOI: falls, motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), motorcycle collisions (MCCs), automobile-pedestrian collisions, and bicycle collisions. Fracture locations, associated injuries, and patient-specific variables were recorded. Heat maps were created to display the fracture incidence by rib location.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 1,121 patients with a median RibScore of 2 (range, 0-3) and 9,353 fractures. The average age was 57±20 years, and 64% of patients were male. By MOI, the number of patients and fractures were as follows: falls (474 patients, 3,360 fractures), MVCs (353 patients, 3,268 fractures), MCCs (165 patients, 1,505 fractures), automobile-pedestrian collisions (70 patients, 713 fractures), and bicycle collisions (59 patients, 507 fractures). The most commonly injured rib was the sixth rib, and the most common fracture location was lateral. Statistically significant differences in the location and patterns of fractures were identified comparing each MOI, except for MCCs versus bicycle collisions.

Conclusions

Different mechanisms of injury result in distinct rib fracture patterns. These different patterns should be considered in the workup and management of patients with thoracic injuries. Given these significant differences, future studies should account for both fracture location and the MOI to better define what populations benefit from surgical versus nonoperative management.

[Treatment strategy for severe implosion injuries of the lateral chest wall]

In the majority of cases implosion injuries to the thoracic wall are caused by blunt, massive force acting on the thorax. Basically, different regions and directions of the acting energy have to be taken into account. In common usage, the term implosion injury has become established, especially for the sequelae of lateral energy impact. Particular attention should be paid to the stability of the shoulder girdle, the underlying hemithorax and its intrathoracic organs.

Validity of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator as a tool to predict postoperative outcomes in subacute orthopedic trauma diagnoses

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to validate the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (SCR) to predict 30-day postoperative outcomes in patients with one of the following subacute orthopedic trauma diagnoses; multiple rib fractures, pelvic ring/acetabular fracture, or unilateral femoral fracture.

Methods

Data of patients with these diagnoses treated between January 1, 2015 and September 19, 2020 were extracted from the patients' medical files. Diagnostic performance, discrimination, calibration, and accuracy of the ACS NSQIP SRC to predict specific outcomes developing within 30 days after surgery was determined.

Results

The total cohort of the three diagnoses consisted of 435 patients. ACS NSQIP SRC underestimated the risk for serious complications, especially in patients with multiple rib fractures (8.3% predicted vs 17.2% observed) or pelvic ring/acetabular fracture (6.1% vs 19.8%). Underestimation was more pronounced for the composite outcome 'any complication'. Sensitivity ranged from 16.7% to 100% and specificity from 41.1% to 97.1%. Specificity exceeded sensitivity for pelvic ring/acetabular and femoral fractures. Discrimination was good for predicting death (femoral fracture), fair for readmission (femoral fracture), serious complication (multiple rib fractures), and any complication (multiple rib fractures), but poor in all other outcomes and diagnoses. Calibration and accuracy were adequate for all three diagnoses (p-value for Hosmer-Lemeshow test >0.05 and Brier scores <0.25).

Conclusion

Performance of the ACS NSQIP SRC in the studied cohort was variable for all three diagnoses. Although it underestimated the risk of most outcomes, calibration and accuracy seemed generally adequate. For most outcomes, adequate diagnostic performance and discrimination could not be confirmed.

Timing matters: Early versus late rib fixation in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has shown that surgical stabilization of rib fractures benefits patients with rib fractures accompanied by pulmonary contusion; however, the impact of timing on surgical stabilization of rib fractures in this patient population remains unexplored. We aimed to compare early versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with traumatic rib fractures and concurrent pulmonary contusion.

METHODS

We selected all adult patients with isolated blunt chest trauma, multiple rib fractures, and pulmonary contusion undergoing early (<72 hours) versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures (≥72 hours) using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2016 to 2020. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for patient, injury, and hospital characteristics. Our outcomes were hospital length of stay, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unplanned intubation, ventilator days, unplanned intensive care unit admission, intensive care unit length of stay, tracheostomy rates, and mortality. We then performed sub-group analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion.

RESULTS

We included 2,839 patients, of whom 1,520 (53.5%) underwent early surgical stabilization of rib fractures. After propensity score matching, 1,096 well-balanced pairs were formed. Early surgical stabilization of rib fractures was associated with a decrease in hospital length of stay (9 vs 13 days; P < .001), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 7 days; P < .001), and lower rates of unplanned intubation (7.4% vs 11.4%; P = .001), unplanned intensive care unit admission (4.2% vs 105%, P < .001), and tracheostomy (8.4% vs 12.4%; P = .002). Similar results were also found in the subgroup analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion, the early implementation of surgical stabilization of rib fractures could be beneficial regardless of the severity of pulmonary contusion.

Evolution of Pulmonary Contusions in Patients With Severe Rib Fractures: Cause for Concern?

INTRODUCTION

The progression of pulmonary contusions remains poorly understood. This study aimed to measure the radiographic change in pulmonary contusions over time and evaluate the association of the radiographic change with clinical outcomes and surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults admitted with three or more displaced rib fractures or flail segment on trauma CT and when a chest CT was repeated within one week after trauma. Radiographic severity of pulmonary contusions was assessed using the Blunt Pulmonary Contusion Score (BPC18). Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relation between SSRF and worsening contusions on repeat CT, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 231 patients, 56 (24%) had a repeat CT scan. Of these, 55 (98%) had pulmonary contusion on the first CT scan with a median BPC18 score of 5 (P25-P75 3-7). Repeat CTs showed an overall decrease of the median BPC18 score to 4 (P25-P75 2-6, P = .02), but demonstrated a worsening of the pulmonary contusion in 16 patients (29%). All repeat CTs conducted within 12 hours post-injury demonstrated increasing BPC18. Radiographic worsening of pulmonary contusions was not associated with SSRF, nor with worse respiratory outcomes or intensive care length of stay, compared to patients with radiographically stable or improving contusions.

DISCUSSION

In patients with severe rib fracture patterns who undergo repeat imaging, pulmonary contusions are prevalent and become radiographically worse within at least the first 12 hours after injury. No association between radiographic worsening and clinical outcomes was found.

Early Repair of Rib Fractures Is Associated with Superior Length of Stay and Total Hospital Cost: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that early scheduling of the surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with superior outcomes. It is unclear if these data are reproducible at other institutions. We hypothesized that early SSRF would be associated with decreased morbidity, length of stay, and total charges. Materials and Methods: Adult patients who underwent SSRF for multiple rib fractures or flail chest were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) by ICD-10 code from the fourth quarter of 2015 to 2016. Patients were excluded for traumatic brain injury and missing study variables. Procedures occurring after hospital day 10 were excluded to remove possible confounding. Early fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital day 0 or 1, and late fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital days 2 through 10. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or discharge to a short-term hospital, as determined by NIS coding. Secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization (LOS) and total cost. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum testing were performed to determine differences in outcomes between the groups. One-to-one propensity matching was performed using covariates known to affect the outcome of rib fractures. Stuart-Maxwell marginal homogeneity and Wilcoxon signed rank matched pair testing was performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: Of the 474 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 148 (31.2%) received early repair and 326 (68.8%) received late repair. In unmatched analysis, the composite adverse outcome was lower among early fixation (16.2% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001), total hospital cost was less (USD114k vs. USD215k, p < 0.001), and length of stay was shorter (6 days vs. 12 days) among early SSRF patients. Propensity matching identified 131 matched pairs of early and late SSRF. Composite adverse outcomes were less common among early SSRF (18.3% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.011). The LOS was shorter among early SSRF (6 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.001), and total hospital cost was also lower among early SSRF patients (USD118k vs. USD183k late, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In a large administrative database, early SSRF was associated with reduced adverse outcomes, as well as improved hospital length of stay and total cost. These data corroborate other research and suggest that early SSRF is preferred. Studies of outcomes after SSRF should stratify analyses by timing of procedure.

Early Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures is Feasible in Patients With Non-Urgent Operative Pelvic Injuries

INTRODUCTION

The feasibility of prioritizing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in patients with other injuries is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing and outcomes of SSRF between patients with and without non-urgent operative pelvic injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, all patients between 2010 and 2020 who underwent SSRF (SSRF group) and those who underwent SSRF and non-urgent operative management of pelvic fractures (SSRF + P group) were included. Demographics, injury characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Over 11 years, 154 SSRF patients were identified, with 143 patients in the SSRF group (93%) and 11 patients in the SSRF + P group (7%). Median number of rib fractures (7 vs 9, P = .04), total number of fractures (11 vs 15, P < .01), and flail segment (54% vs 91%, P = .02) were higher in SSRF + P group. Median time to SSRF was similar (0 vs 1 day, P = .20) between the 2 groups. Median time to pelvic fixation was 3 days in SSRF + P group and 8 out of 11 patients (73%) underwent SSRF prior to pelvic fixation. Median operative time (137 vs 178 mins, P = .14) and median number of ribs plated (4 vs 5, P = .05) were higher in SSRF + P group. There was no difference in SSRF-related complications, pelvic fracture-related complications from operative positioning, rates of pneumonia, or mortality between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRF can be performed early in patients with non-urgent operative pelvic injuries without a difference in pelvic fracture-related complications, SSRF-related complications, pneumonia, or mortality.

Does the timing of surgery affect outcomes in young and middle-aged patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures? Feedback was based on real data from physicians, patients, and family caregivers

BACKGROUND

There is a general clinical consensus that early surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF, ≤ 48-72 h after admission) can benefit patients, and this is only regarding the surgeon's opinions. This study assessed the true outcomes of young and middle-aged patients at different surgical timings.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients aged 30-55 years who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of isolated rib fractures and underwent SSRF between July 2017 and September 2021. The patients were divided into early (≤ 3 days), mid- (4-7 days) and late (8-14 days) groups, according to the interval (days) between surgery and injury date. The impact of different surgical timings on clinical outcomes, patients, and families was assessed by comparing SSRF-related data during hospitalization and follow-up studies of clinicians, patients themselves, and family caregivers 1-2 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In this study, 155 complete patient data were finally included, including 52, 64, and 39 patients in the early, mid, and late groups, respectively. Length of operation, preoperative closed chest drainage rate, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit length of stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the early group were lower than those in the intermediate and late groups. Additionally, hemothorax and excess pleural fluid incidence after SSRF was lower in the early group than in the intermediate and late groups. Postoperative follow-up results showed that patients in the early group had higher SF-12 physical component summary scores and shorter duration of absence from work. Family caregivers had lower Zarit Burden Interview scores than those in the mid- and late groups.

CONCLUSION

From the experience of our institution's SSRF, early surgery is safe and offers additional potential benefits for young and middle-aged patients and families with isolated rib fractures.

Medical Sports Injuries in American Football Players

Most injuries in American football are orthopedic, but the medical team must also be prepared to recognize and manage injuries beyond the musculoskeletal system that may result from trauma to the face, chest, abdomen, and pelvic regions. Failure to promptly identify such injuries in athletes can be life-threatening or permanently disabling. The literature on many of the nonorthopedic sports injuries is limited but can aid in understanding injury presentation, imaging modalities of choice, and initial management. Safe return-to-play decision-making requires a thoughtful approach through the use of available data and an understanding of pathophysiology and tissue healing.

Outcomes of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in a minority population: Retrospective analysis of a case series from an acute care facility

Objective

The aim of was to examine the postoperative outcomes and associated factors of surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) in a minority population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis with case series of 10 patients undergoing SSRF at an acute care facility in New York City was performed. Data, including patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, hospital length of stay were collected. Results were presented in comparative tables and a Kaplan-Meier curve. Primary outcome was to compare outcomes of SSRF in minority patients to larger studies in nonminority populations. Secondary outcomes included various postoperative outcomes, including atelectasis, pain, and infection, and the influence of medical comorbidities on each.

Results

The median time (with accompanying interquartile range) from diagnosis to SSRF, SSRF to discharge, and overall length of stay was 4.5 days (4.25), 6.0 days (17.00) and 10.5 days (18.25) days, respectively. The time until SSRF and postoperative complication rate were found to be comparable to those in larger studies. The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrates a correlation between persistence of atelectasis to increased length of stay (P = .05). Increased time to SSRF was seen in elderly patients and patients with diabetes (P = .012 and P = .019, respecively). Increased pain requirements by patients with diabetes (P = .007), and higher infectious complications in patients with flail chest and diabetes (P = .035 and P = .002, respectively) were also seen.

Conclusions

Preliminary outcomes and complication rates of SSRF in a minority population are shown to be comparable to larger studies in nonminority populations. Larger, higher-powered studies are required to further compare outcomes between these 2 populations.

When to proceed to surgical rib fixation?-A single-institution clinical experience

Background

Surgical rib fixation for multiple rib fractures and flail chest has become more common in the 2000s with interesting results in selected patients. However, surgical rib fixation lacks a consensus on the delay to surgery and the benefits on postoperative clinical outcomes. Our goal was to determine if delay to surgery can affect postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We analyzed a retrospective database including all consecutive patients referred for surgical rib fixation. All outcomes were explored according to trauma mechanism, associated lesions, initial ventilatory status, delay to surgery, surgical technique and a specific focus was made towards post-operative care and pulmonary complications. Logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between delay to surgery [before 48 hours (early group), 48 hours to 7 days (mid group), more than 7 days (late group)] and pneumonia and failure of extubating.

Results

From 2010 to 2020, 159 patients underwent surgical rib fixation. The median hospital length of stay was 18 days (interquartile range, 13-30 days). Pulmonary infections were encountered in 67 patients (42.2%) with about two third of early pneumonia (<5 days). The one-month mortality rate was 1.9%. Delay to surgery was not associated with either pneumonia (P>0.05) or failure of extubating (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical rib fixation can be delayed without increasing the risk of pulmonary complications. Stabilizing other clinical situations can be safely prioritized if needed. A global evaluation including characteristics of trauma and lung evaluation must be considered before surgical stabilization of rib fracture.

Management of thoracic trauma

Managing major thoracic trauma begins with identifying and anticipating injuries associated with the mechanism of injury. The key aims are to reduce early mortality and the impact of associated complications to expedite recovery and restore the patient to their pre-injury state. While imaging is imperative to identify the extent of thoracic trauma, some pathology may require immediate treatment. The majority can be managed with adequate pleural drainage, but respiratory failure and poor gas exchange may require either non-invasive or invasive ventilation. Ventilation strategies to protect from complications such as barotrauma, volutrauma and ventilator-induced lung injury are important to consider. The management of pain is vital in reducing respiratory complications. A multimodal strategy using local, regional and systemic analgesia may mitigate respiratory side effects of opioid use. With optimal pain management, physiotherapy can be fully utilised to reduce respiratory complications and enhance early recovery. Thoracic surgeons should be consulted early for consideration of surgical management of specific injuries. With a greater understanding of the mechanisms of injury and the appropriate use of available resources, favourable outcomes can be reached in this cohort of patients. Overall, a multidisciplinary and holistic approach results in the best patient outcomes.

Comparison of surgical stabilization of rib fractures vs epidural analgesia on in-hospital outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves functional outcomes compared to controls, partly due to reduction in pain. We investigated the impact of early SSRF on pulmonary complications, mortality, and length of stay compared to non-operative analgesia with epidural analgesia (EA).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) 2017 dataset for adults with rib fractures, excluding those with traumatic brain injury or death within twenty-four hours. Early SSRF and EA occurred within 72 h, and we excluded those who received both or neither intervention. Our primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Additional outcomes included unplanned endotracheal intubation, in-hospital mortality, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) for those surviving to discharge. Multiple logistic and linear regressions were controlled for variables including age, sex, flail chest (FC), injury severity, additional procedures, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

We included 1,024 and 1,109 patients undergoing early SSRF and EA, respectively. SSRF patients were more severely injured with higher rates of FC (42.8 vs 13.3%, p<0.001), Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16 (56.9 vs 36.1%, p<0.001), and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) Thorax > 3 (33.3 vs 12.2%, p<0.001). Overall, 49 (2.3%) of patients developed ARDS or VAP, 111 (5.2%) required unplanned intubation, and 58 (2.7%) expired prior to discharge. On multivariable analysis, SSRF was not associated with the primary composite outcome (OR: 1.65, 95%CI: 0.85-3.21). Early SSRF significantly predicted decreased risk of unplanned intubation (OR:0.59, 95%CI: 0.38-0.92) compared with early EA alone, however, was not a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.27, 95%CI: 0.68-2.39). SSRF was associated with significantly longer hospital (Exp(β): 1.06, 95%CI: 1.00-1.12, p = 0.047) and ICU LOS (Exp(β): 1.17, 95%CI: 1.08-1.27, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aside from unplanned intubation, we observed no statistically significant difference in the adjusted odds of in-hospital pulmonary morbidity or mortality for patients undergoing early SSRF compared with early EA. Chest wall injury patients may benefit from referral to trauma centers where both interventions are available and appropriate surgical candidates may receive timely intervention.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures versus nonoperative treatment in patients with multiple rib fractures following cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An international, retrospective matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

The presence of six or more rib fractures or a displaced rib fracture due to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been associated with longer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). Evidence on the effect of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) following CPR is limited. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after SSRF versus nonoperative management in patients with multiple rib fractures after CPR.

METHODS

An international, retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent SSRF or nonoperative management for multiple rib fractures following CPR between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2020. Patients who underwent SSRF were matched to nonoperative controls by cardiac arrest location and cause, rib fracture pattern, and age. The primary outcome was ICU LOS.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine operatively treated patient were matched to 66 nonoperatively managed controls with comparable CPR-related characteristics. Patients who underwent SSRF more often had displaced rib fractures (n = 28 [72%] vs. n = 31 [47%]; p = 0.015) and a higher median number of displaced ribs (2 [P 25 -P 75 , 0-3] vs. 0 [P 25 -P 75 , 0-3]; p = 0.014). Surgical stabilization of rib fractures was performed at a median of 5 days (P 25 -P 75 , 3-8 days) after CPR. In the nonoperative group, a rib fixation specialist was consulted in 14 patients (21%). The ICU LOS was longer in the SSRF group (13 days [P 25 -P 75 , 9-23 days] vs. 9 days [P 25 -P 75 , 5-15 days]; p = 0.004). Mechanical ventilator-free days, hospital LOS, thoracic complications, and mortality were similar.

CONCLUSION

Despite matching, those who underwent SSRF over nonoperative management for multiple rib fractures following CPR had more severe consequential chest wall injury and a longer ICU LOS. A benefit of SSRF on in-hospital outcomes could not be demonstrated. A low consultation rate for rib fixation in the nonoperative group indicates that the consideration to perform SSRF in this population might be associated with other nonradiographic or injury-related variables.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Surgical Rib Fixation in Obese Patients with Isolated Flail Chest Improves Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with adverse outcomes after major operations. The role of operative rib fixation (RF) in obese patients with flail chest is not clear. The presence of other associated injuries may complicate the interpretation of outcomes. This study compared outcomes after RF to nonoperative management (NOM) in obese patients with isolated flail chest injury.

METHODS

Adult obese patients (BMI > 29.9) with flail chest were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, death within 72 h, and extrathoracic injuries were excluded. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:2) to similar NOM patients. Multivariate regression identified independent factors predicting adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 367 patients with isolated flail chest who underwent RF were matched with 734 in the NOM group. After matching, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the RF group (1.4% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.05). RF had longer HLOS (15.7 days vs. 12.8 days; p < 0.05) and ICU LOS (10.1 days vs. 8.6 days; p < 0.05), shorter ventilator days (9.2 days vs. 11.5 days; p < 0.05), and a higher rate of venous thromboembolism (7.1% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, RF was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.27; p < 0.05). Early RF (≤ 72 h) was associated with shorter ICU stay and mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSION

RF for isolated flail chest in obese patients is associated with decreased mortality and fewer ventilator days. When performed early, fixation decreases the need for prolonged ventilator use and ICU stay. A more aggressive VTE prophylaxis should be considered in patients undergoing RF.

Flail chest injury-changing management and outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in management of flail chest injuries over time and to determine impact on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of data from a prospectively collated database of all trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma service in Victoria was conducted. All trauma patients admitted to the hospital between July 2008 and June 2020 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code for flail chest injury were included.

RESULTS

Our study included 720 patients, mean age was 59.5 ± 17.3 years old, and 76.5% of patients were male. Length of ICU stay decreased on average by 9 h each year. Regional anaesthesia use increased by 15% per year (0% in 2009 to 36% in 2020) (p < 0.001). Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures increased by 16% per year (2.9% in 2009 to 22.3% in 2020) (p = 0.006). The use of invasive ventilation decreased by 14% per year (70% in 2008 to 27% in 2020) (p < 0.001), and invasive ventilation time decreased by 8 h per year (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Over the past decade, we have seen increasing rates of regional anaesthesia and surgical rib fixation in the management of flail chest. This has resulted in lower requirements for and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay but has not impacted mortality in this patient cohort.

Is There a Role for Rib Plating in Thoracic Trauma?

Rib fractures are a morbid consequence of blunt trauma and are associated with a highly variable clinical presentation ranging from nondisplaced rib fractures causing limited, manageable pain to severely displaced rib fractures with concomitant thoracic injuries leading to respiratory failure. Due to an evolution of techniques, hardware technology, and general acceptance, rib plating has increased substantially at trauma centers all throughout the United States over the past decade. This article aims to review the most recent and current reports for rib plating with respect to indications, preoperative evaluation and imaging, approaches, timing for intervention, outcomes in patients with flail chest and nonflail injuries, and the management of complications. From these data, it becomes clear that the surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has a firm place in the management of thoracic trauma.

Impact of Time of Surgery on the Outcome after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Severely Injured Patients with Severe Chest Trauma—A Matched-Pairs Analysis of the German Trauma Registry

Purpose

In severely injured patients with multiple rib fractures, the beneficial effect of surgical stabilization is still unknown. The existing literature shows divergent results, and the indication and especially the right timing of an operation are the subject of a broad discussion. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the time point of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) on the outcome in a multicenter database with special regard to the duration of ventilation, intensive care, and overall hospital stay.

Methods

Data from the TraumaRegister DGU collected between 2010 and 2019 were used to evaluate patients above 16 years of age with severe rib fractures [Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS)  ≥ 3] who received an SSRF in a matched-pairs analysis. In this matched-pairs analysis, we compared the effects of an early SSRF within 48 h after initial trauma vs. late SSRF 3–10 days after trauma.

Results

After the selection process, we were able to find 142 matched pairs for further evaluation. Early SSRF was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (16.2 days vs. 12.7 days, p = 0.020), and the overall hospital stay (28.5 days vs. 23.4 days, p = 0.005) was significantly longer in the group with late SSRF. Concerning the days on mechanical ventilation, we were able to demonstrate a trend for an approximately 1.5 day shorter ventilation time for patients after early SSRF, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.226).

Conclusions

We were able to determine the significant beneficial effects of early SSRF resulting in a shorter intensive care unit stay and a shorter length of stay in hospital and additionally a trend to a shorter time on mechanical ventilation.

Surgical stabilization versus nonoperative treatment for flail and non-flail rib fracture patterns in patients with traumatic brain injury

Purpose

Literature on outcomes after SSRF, stratified for rib fracture pattern is scarce in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12). We hypothesized that SSRF is associated with improved outcomes as compared to nonoperative management without hampering neurological recovery in these patients.

Methods

A post hoc subgroup analysis of the multicenter, retrospective CWIS-TBI study was performed in patients with TBI and stratified by having sustained a non-flail fracture pattern or flail chest between January 1, 2012 and July 31, 2019. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation-free days and secondary outcomes were in-hospital outcomes. In multivariable analysis, outcomes were assessed, stratified for rib fracture pattern.

Results

In total, 449 patients were analyzed. In patients with a non-flail fracture pattern, 25 of 228 (11.0%) underwent SSRF and in patients with a flail chest, 86 of 221 (38.9%). In multivariable analysis, ventilator-free days were similar in both treatment groups. For patients with a non-flail fracture pattern, the odds of pneumonia were significantly lower after SSRF (odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.77; p = 0.013). In patients with a flail chest, the ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the SSRF group (beta, − 2.96 days; 95% CI − 5.70 to − 0.23; p = 0.034).

Conclusion

In patients with TBI and a non-flail fracture pattern, SSRF was associated with a reduced pneumonia risk. In patients with TBI and a flail chest, a shorter ICU LOS was observed in the SSRF group. In both groups, SSRF was safe and did not hamper neurological recovery.