Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: clinical characteristics and prognostic evaluation of 49 cases with surgical resection

Epidemiology, prognostic factors, and survival analysis in small cell esophageal carcinoma: A population-based study with external validation

Small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a poorly differentiated esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasm with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to explore the factors and treatment approaches influencing the prognosis of SCEC. In this retrospective study, we collected data from the 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries cohort between 2004 and 2019, as well as from a Chinese institutional registry covering the period from 2012 to 2022. We assessed the annual percentage change (APC) in incidence of SCEC. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate survival outcomes. Additionally, nomograms were developed for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the SEER cohort for SCEC and validated in an independent Chinese cohort. This analysis included 299 SCEC patients from the SEER cohort and 66 cases from the Chinese cohort. During the period of 2004-2019, the incidence of SCEC reached a plateau, with an APC of -1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.3 to 1.40, P > 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that age, distant metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent factors for OS, while distant metastasis and chemotherapy were independent factors for CSS. The nomograms developed for OS and CSS in SCEC exhibited remarkable accuracy and reliable predictive capacity in estimating 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and CSS. SCEC is a rare malignancy with aggressive behavior. Distant metastasis is significantly associated with worse OS and CSS in patients with SCEC. Currently, chemotherapy remains the primary treatment approach for SCEC.

Multimodal Treatment With Nivolumab Contributes to Long-Term Survival in a Case of Unresectable Esophagogastric Junction Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) has an extremely poor prognosis, partly explained by the rarity and diagnostic difficulty, for which the most appropriate treatment strategy has not been established. In this report, we discuss a case of unresectable advanced esophagogastric junction NEC, which was difficult to diagnose, that has achieved relatively long-term survival with multidisciplinary treatment centered on nivolumab. A man in his 60s was initially diagnosed with an advanced esophagogastric junction squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The lymph node metastasis was detected in the regional lymph nodes and para-aortic region. We diagnosed the patient with T3, N3, M1 (Lym), stage IVB, and administered systemic chemotherapy. Due to the failure of first-line, fluorouracil, and cisplatin therapy, we administered nivolumab as the second-line therapy. This therapy demonstrated partial response, so we performed conversion surgery, however the postoperative diagnosis was NEC. Three years after treatment initiation, a single lymph node metastasis has recurred, which is under control with nivolumab and radiation therapy. However, 4.5 years after the start of treatment, with the advent of immune-related adverse events (irAE), nivolumab was discontinued and the patient was placed on surveillance. Six months after that, metastasis to the hilar lymph node and adrenal gland was observed. Both times that recurrence/metastasis appeared, they occurred while nivolumab was being discontinued, suggesting its significant systemic anti-cancer effect. Therefore, nivolumab in particular may be an effective treatment for advanced esophageal NEC, and this case suggests that it may contribute to prolonged progression-free survival.

Long-term survival after conversion surgery for an esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are extremely rare. Published information on their clinical features, pathological findings, and prognosis is lacking. The optimal treatment for esophageal NECs has not yet been determined because they appear extremely malignant histologically and have a poor prognosis. We here report on a patient with an esophageal NEC who was successfully treated with multidisciplinary therapies.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient, a 47-year-old man, was admitted to our hospital with dysphagia and weight loss and an ECOG performance status of 3-4. Upper endoscopy showed a large circumferential neoplasm at the esophagogastric junction. Computed tomography showed lymph node metastases around the left gastric artery. Echocardiography raised a suspicion of invasion of the left atrium. Histopathological examination of biopsy tissue revealed diffuse proliferation of small atypical cells resembling naked nuclei with extensive necrosis and degeneration. The cells showed positive staining for CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin on immunohistochemical analysis. Ki67 was positive in over 90% of cells. He was diagnosed with an esophageal NEC that had infiltrated the left atrium; his cancer was therefore inoperable. Because of his poor overall condition, palliative radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions) was administered, accompanied by nutritional management. This was followed by four courses of chemotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide, after which the primary tumor and locoregional lymph node metastases were found to have shrunk. Thoracoscopic- and laparoscopic-assisted McKeown esophagectomy were performed. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was NEC pT3pN0M0 Stage II. The patient had a good postoperative course and received two courses of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin plus etoposide). Currently, 3 years after commencing treatment, there is no evidence of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

As mentioned above, there is no established treatment regime for esophageal NEC, and the benefits of conversion surgery are unknown. Our patient achieved long-term recurrence-free survival after radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery for an esophageal NEC with left atrial invasion and multiple lymph node metastases. Conversion surgery for esophageal NECs that respond to chemotherapy may contribute to long-term survival.

Rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus: current status and future perspectives

Esophageal cancer is common worldwide, including in Japan, and its major histological subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are some rare esophageal cancers, including neuroendocrine neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, carcinosarcoma and malignant melanoma. The biological and clinical features of these cancers differ from those of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, different treatment strategies are needed for these cancers but are based on limited evidence. Neuroendocrine neoplasm is mainly divided into neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma by differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index or mitotic index. Epidemiologically, the majority of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are neuroendocrine carcinoma. The treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma is similar to that of small cell lung cancer, which has similar morphological and biological features. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is known to be associated with alterations in the c-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes and, if resectable, is treated in accordance with the modified Fletcher classification. Carcinosarcoma is generally resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy and requires multimodal treatments such as surgery plus chemotherapy to achieve cure. Primary malignant melanoma is resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated efficacy for malignant melanoma of the esophagus. This review focuses on the current status and future perspectives for rare cancer of the esophagus.

Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Current Management and Future Perspectives

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly differentiated and highly aggressive epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. The most common primary site is the lung, but they may arise in every organ. Approximately 37% of extrapulmonary NECs (EP-NECs) occur in the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract, followed by the genitourinary (GU) system and gynecological tract. As a result of their rarity, there is scant evidence to guide treatment recommendations, and a multidisciplinary approach is essential for the management of such patients. Platinum-based chemotherapy currently represents the standard of care for EP-NECs of any site, mirroring the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but further approaches are still under investigation. Indeed, ongoing trials evaluating targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and radionuclide therapy could provide potentially breakthrough therapeutic options. Given the relative dearth of evidence-based literature on these orphan diseases, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pathology and current treatment options, as well as to shed light on the most pressing unmet needs in the field.

Small Cell Oesophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Case Series From a UK Tertiary Centre and a Review of the Literature

Background Small cell oesophageal carcinoma (SCEC), a rare neuroendocrine malignancy, presents various challenges in diagnosis and treatment. The condition is characterised by rapid dissemination, a marked responsiveness to chemotherapy, and a guarded prognosis. While the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society has recommended platinum-based chemotherapy, ongoing debates on optimal strategies and the lack of clear guidelines underscore the need for further comprehensive research efforts. Methods This study retrospectively analysed 12 cases of localised pure SCEC treated at a UK tertiary care centre between 2006 and 2020. We systematically analysed and categorised the cases based on stage, performance status, and patient age. This comprehensive approach enabled a nuanced examination of overall survival (OS), thereby providing valuable insights into the differences between outcomes. Results The study revealed a median OS of 12.01 months for treated non-metastatic cases, highlighting the challenges of SCEC management. Conversely, treated metastatic cases exhibited a mean survival of 9.15 months, which contrasts starkly with the 2.55 months demonstrated by those receiving best supportive care (BSC). These figures underscore the urgency for refined strategies in handling advanced localised disease and the need to continue research endeavours to devise methods to enhance the precision and optimise outcomes beyond the presented data. Conclusion Based on our findings, the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery to manage SCEC holds promise; however, further research is needed to optimise the management approach. The lack of clear guidelines underscores the imperative for personalised treatment approaches.

Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), also called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), are relatively uncommon, heterogenous tumors primarily originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the improvement in technology and increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopy, they are being discovered with increasing frequency. Although traditionally considered indolent tumors with good prognoses, some NENs exhibit aggressive behavior. Timely diagnosis, risk stratification, and management can often be a challenge. In general, small NENs without local invasion or lymphovascular involvement can often be managed using minimally invasive advanced endoscopic techniques, while larger lesions and those with evidence of lymphovascular invasion require surgery, systemic therapy, or a combination thereof. Ideal management requires a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the stage and grade of the tumor. With the recent advancements, a therapeutic advanced endoscopist can play a pivotal role in diagnosing, staging, and managing this rare condition. High-definition white light imaging and digital image enhancing technologies like narrow band imaging (NBI) in the newer endoscopes have improved the diagnostic accuracy of traditional endoscopy. The refinement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) over the past decade has revolutionized the role of endoscopy in diagnosing and managing various pathologies, including NENs. In addition to EUS-directed diagnostic biopsies, it also offers the ability to precisely assess the depth of invasion and lymphovascular involvement and thus stage NENs accurately. EUS-directed locoregional ablative therapies are increasingly recognized as highly effective, minimally invasive treatment modalities for NENs, particularly pancreatic NENs. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques like endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) have been increasingly used over the past decade with excellent results in achieving curative resection of various early-stage gastrointestinal luminal lesions including NENs. In this article, we aim to delineate NENs of the different segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, gastric, pancreatic, and small and large intestine) and their management with emphasis on the endoscopic management of these tumors.

Radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced CT texture features for pretreatment prediction of overall survival in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

Limited studies have observed the prognostic value of CT images for esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) due to rare incidence and low treatment experience in clinical. In this study, the pretreatment enhanced CT texture features and clinical characteristics were investigated to predict the overall survival of esophageal NEC.

Methods

This retrospective study included 89 patients with esophageal NEC. The training and testing cohorts comprised 61 (70%) and 28 (30%) patients, respectively. A total of 402 radiomics features were extracted from the tumor region that segmented pretreatment venous phase CT images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression was applied to feature dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature construction. A radiomics nomogram was constructed based on the radiomics signature and clinical risk factors using a multivariable Cox proportional regression. The performance of the nomogram for the pretreatment prediction of overall survival (OS) was evaluated for discrimination and calibration.

Results

Only the enhancement degree was an independent factor in clinical variable influenced OS. The radiomics signatures demonstrated good predictability for prognostic status discrimination. The radiomics nomogram integrating texture signatures was slightly superior to the nomogram derived from the combined model with a C-index of 0.844 (95%CI: 0.783-0.905) and 0.847 (95% CI: 0.782-0.912) in the training set, and 0.805 (95%CI: 0.707-0.903) and 0.745 (95% CI: 0.639-0.851) in the testing set, respectively.

Conclusion

The radiomics nomogram based on pretreatment CT radiomics signature had better prognostic power and predictability of the overall survival in patients with esophageal NEC than the model using combined variables.

Expert Consensus Practice Recommendations of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society for the management of high grade gastroenteropancreatic and gynecologic neuroendocrine neoplasms

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

High-Grade Pure Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Arising From Barrett's Mucosa: A Rare Phenomenon

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (E-NEC) is a very rare neuroendocrine tumor. There are only a few case reports where pure esophageal NEC is found to be arising from Barett's mucosa. Here we present a case of high-grade pure E-NEC arising from Barrett's esophagus, which was metastasized to the liver at the time of diagnosis.

The impact of surgery and survival prediction in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at assessing the impact of surgical treatments in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis based on data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

A total of 7515 patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs from 2004 to 2015 were evaluated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. There were 1483 patients in the surgery group and 6032 patients in the nonsurgery group. Compared with patients in the surgery group, patients in the nonsurgery group were inclined to receive chemotherapy (50.8 vs. 16.7%) and radiation (12.9 vs. 3.7%) as treatment options. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed higher rates of overall survival (OS) outcomes for GEP-NETs patients who had been subjected to surgery (hazard ratio=0.483, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). Then, to reduce the impact of bias, a 1 : 1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed for the two groups of patients. A total of 1760 patients were assessed and each subgroup included 880 patients. In the matched population, the patients exhibited the ability to significantly benefit from surgery (hazard ratio=0.455, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). The OS outcomes for radiation or chemotherapy patients who had been treated with surgery were better than those of patients who had not been treated with surgery ( P <0.001). In addition, it was found that the OS of patients was not significant after rectum and small intestine surgery, whereas there was a significant difference in OS after colon, pancreas, and stomach surgery on the patients. Patients who had been subjected to surgery in the rectum and small intestines exhibited better therapeutic benefits.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GEP-NETs who are treated with surgery have better OS outcomes. Therefore, surgery is recommended for specified selected patients with metastatic GEP-NETs.

Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in esophageal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: A bicenter retrospective study

Objective

The aim of this bicentric retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with esophageal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NECs).

Methods

From the database of two centers, 28 patients affected by esophageal high-grade NECs who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Metabolic parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, tumor-to-blood-pool SUV ratio (TBR), tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) of the primary tumor were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

After a median follow-up period of 22 months, disease progression occurred in 11 (39.3%) patients, and death occurred in 8 (28.6%) patients. The median PFS was 34 months, and the median OS was not reached. Univariate analyses revealed that among metabolic parameters, only MTV and TLG were significant prognostic factors, while among clinical variables, only distant metastasis was a significant factor for both PFS and OS (P&lt; 0.05). On multivariate analyses, MTV and TLG were independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS (P&lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients with esophageal high-grade NEC, MTV and TLG measured on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT are independently prognostic factors for predicting PFS and OS, and might be used as quantitative prognostic imaging biomarkers.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides up-to-date and practical advice on the diagnosis and management of digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on recent developments and study results. These recommendations aim to pave the road for more standardized care for our patients resulting in improved outcomes. Prognosis is generally poor for digestive NEC, most are advanced at diagnosis and median survival in metastatic disease is 11-12 months. Surgery can be of benefit for localized disease after extensive preoperative imaging. Carboplatin in combination with etoposide is recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Irinotecan with fluoropyrimidines has the best evidence as second-line treatment. Immunotherapy plays a minor role in biomarker-unselected patients. Molecular profiling if available is encouraged to identify new targets. More prospective clinical trials are highly needed to fulfil the unmet needs in this field, especially on new predictive and prognostic biomarkers and to improve survival of patients with advanced disease.

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Esophagus With Liver Metastasis: A Case Report

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is a rare and aggressive malignancy. It is challenging to manage NEC due to its rarity. NEC may be asymptomatic or present with various symptoms such as dysphagia, abdominal discomfort, weight loss, melena, hot flushes, or diarrhea. We present the case of a 55-year-old male with a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus. His aggressive and rapid progression of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus resulted in a poor clinical outcome.

Large-Cell Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Report of a Rare Case

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms with neuroendocrine characteristics such as secretion of neuropeptides, large secretory vesicles, and a lack of neural structures. Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is a very rare malignancy. We present the case of a 58-year-old male with a pure large cell NEC of the esophagus.

Clinicopathological analysis of 67 cases of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on prognosis

The clinicopathological properties of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) and its optimal therapy have not been widely studied, as the disease is not common. Consequently, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the clinical features as well as the prognosis of patients with surgically resected ENEC.The clinicopathological data of patients with ENEC who underwent esophagostomy with regional lymphadenectomy at Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Jiangsu Provincial Tumor Hospital starting January 2008 until December 2014 were collected.Ninety-two cases of ENEC were part of this study. However, only 67 patients were analyzed and followed up. A univariate model for the Cox proportional hazards revealed that prognosis was associated with postoperative adjuvant therapy, age, and lymph node metastasis (P < .05); a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that postoperative adjuvant therapy was a significant independent prognostic factor. Postoperative adjuvant therapy directly affected overall survival, with a significant disparity noted between the groups (P = .022). In this study, patients who received adjuvant therapy had an average time of survival of 39 months (interquartile range: 27.068-50.932 months), while those who did not receive adjuvant therapy had an average survival time of 13 months (interquartile range: 10.129-15.871 months). The survival time was longer in the treated group than in the untreated group (hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.94; P = .034).ENEC is a heterogeneous tumor with a very poor prognosis. Combining surgery with adjuvant and/or chemotherapy significantly prolongs the survival of patients, and the optimal treatment for ENEC should be determined with future prospective studies.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram model for Chinese patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCE) is a highly invasive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis compared with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Due to the limited samples size and the short follow-up time, there are few reports on elucidating the prognosis of PSCE, especially on the establishment and validation of a survival prediction nomogram model covering general information, pathological factors and specific biological proteins of PSCE patients.

AIM

To establish an effective nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) probability for PSCE patients in China.

METHODS

The nomogram was based on a retrospective study of 256 PSCE patients. Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to examine the prognostic factors associated with PSCE, and establish the model for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS based on the Akaike information criterion. Discrimination and validation were assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Histology type, age, tumor invasion depth, lymph node invasion, detectable metastasis, chromogranin A, and neuronal cell adhesion molecule 56 were integrated into the model.

RESULTS

The C-index was prognostically superior to the 7^th tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging in the primary cohort [0.659 (95%CI: 0.607-0.712) vs 0.591 (95%CI: 0.517-0.666), P = 0.033] and in the validation cohort [0.700 (95%CI: 0.622-0.778) vs 0.605 (95%CI: 0.490-0.721), P = 0.041]. Good calibration curves were observed for the prediction probabilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in both cohorts. DCA analysis showed that our nomogram model had a higher overall net benefit compared to the 7^th TNM staging .

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram can be used to predict the survival probability of PSCE patients, which can help clinicians to make individualized survival predictions.

Time to give up traditional methods for the management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease group and constitute 0.5% of all malignancies. The annual incidence of NETs is increasing worldwide. The reason for the increase in the incidence of NETs is the detection of benign lesions, incidental detection due to the highest use of endoscopic and imaging procedures, and higher recognition rates of pathologists. There have been exciting developments regarding NET biology in recent years. Among these, first of all, somatostatin receptors and downstream pathways in neuroendocrine cells have been found to be important regulatory mechanisms for protein synthesis, hormone secretion, and proliferation. Subsequently, activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway was found to be an important mechanism in angiogenesis and tumor survival and cell metabolism. Finally, the importance of proangiogenic factors (platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblastic growth factor, angiopoietin, and semaphorins) in the progression of NET has been determined. Using the combination of biomarkers and imaging methods allows early evaluation of the appropriateness of treatment and response to treatment.

Risk Factors and Predictive Score Model for Early Recurrence After Curative Surgery in Patients With Poorly Differentiated Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Purpose: Studies on early recurrence in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) are lacking and risk factors related to early recurrence are not clear. We evaluated risk factors for early recurrence in such patients and developed a predictive scoring model.

Methods: Patients undergoing curative surgery for GI-NEC or MANEC between January 2010 and January 2019 were included. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 12 months after surgery. Risk factors for early recurrence were identified using logistic regression.

Results: Of the 80 included patients, 27 developed early recurrence and 53 had no early recurrence. Independent risk factors associated with early recurrence included tumor location in the midgut/hindgut [odds ratio (OR) = 5.077, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.058–24.352, p = 0.042], alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >80 (OR = 5.331, 95% CI 1.557–18.258, p = 0.008), and lymph node ratio (LNR) >0.25 (OR = 6.578, 95% CI 1.971–21.951, p = 0.002). Risk scores were assigned to tumor location (foregut, 0; midgut/hindgut, 1), ALP (≤80, 0; >80, 1), and LNR (≤0.25, 0; >0.25, 1). Patients with a high risk (score 2–3) for early recurrence had significantly shorter disease-free survival and overall survival than those with low- (score 0) and intermediate risks (score 1) (both p < 0.001). The novel scoring model had superior predictive efficiency for early recurrence over TNM staging (area under the curve 0.795 vs. 0.614, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Tumor location, preoperative ALP, and LNR were independent factors associated with early recurrence after curative surgery for GI-NEC or MANEC. The risk scoring model developed based on these three factors shows superior predictive efficiency.

Nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A population study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

This study aims to establish an effective prognostic nomogram for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE).A total of 552 patients with SCCE from 1975 to 2016 were extracted from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of patients, and a nomogram was constructed. The nomogram was then validated internally by using a consistency index (C-index) and a correction curve to evaluate its predictive value.The Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that age, stage, surgery, primary site, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were the prognostic factors of SCCE (P < .1), and they were used to construct the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.749 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.722-0.776). The data were randomly divided into a modeling group and a validation group based on 7:3 for internal validation. The C-indices of the modeling and validation groups were 0.753 and 0.725, respectively, and they were close to 0.749. The calibration curves exhibited good consistency between the predicted and actual survival rates.The nomogram of the survival and prognosis of patients with SCCE in this study had a good predictive value and could provide clinicians with accurate and practical predictive tools. It could also be used to facilitate a rapid and accurate assessment of patients' survival and prognosis on an individual basis.

An esophageal neuroendocrine tumor in a Barrett's esophagus successfully treated with endoscopic resection

Neuroendocrine tumors rarely occur in the esophagus because the neuroendocrine system is not well developed in the esophagus. The case of a neuroendocrine esophageal tumor developed in a patient with Barret's esophagus is presented. It was successfully trated by endoscopy.

Prognostic value of pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma: A multi-center follow-up study

BACKGROUND

The rare incidence of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and limited treatment experience result in insufficient clinical observations and unsuitable guidelines for its management.

AIM

To investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) characteristics in patients with esophageal NEC.

METHODS

Seventy-seven esophageal NEC patients who received contrast-enhanced CT at two hospitals were enrolled in this study from June 2014 to December 2019. The clinical features and image characteristics were recorded accordingly. Univariate survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was carried out with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis performed using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and degree of enhancement were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Meanwhile, adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) of N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and degree of enhancement (mild vs moderate/marked) for OS were 0.426 (P = 0.024), 3.862 (P = 0.006), and 2.169/0.809 (P = 0.037), respectively. The HR of adjuvant chemotherapy for PFS was 6.432 (P < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with degree of enhancement (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. Additionally, N stage and degree of enhancement are prognostic factors for OS in patients with esophageal NEC.

Clinicopathological Features of Gastroesophageal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare entity. Recent 2019 WHO classifications reflect our understanding of tumor biology, namely, that distinct molecular characteristics underline tumor behavior and prognosis. Here, we reviewed the evidence for linking molecular findings with the clinicopathological features and treatment of gastroesophageal NENs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Degree of differentiation and Ki-67 proliferation index are required for accurate classification of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas but not sufficient to distinguish between the two entities. Resection remains the mainstay treatment for early-stage gastroesophageal neuroendocrine tumors. Additional perioperative therapy may benefit mitotically active tumors. There is a role for somatostatin analogues, especially in the setting of metastatic and symptomatic disease. New radiolabeled somatostatin analogues, immunotherapy, and embolization offer multimodality treatments for distant metastases. We need to understand the specific underlying biology of the various subtypes of gastroesophageal NENs to provide tailored treatment.

[Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms-Heterogeneity, management and perspectives of treatment and research]

The term neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) encompasses a molecularly and biologically very heterogeneous group of tumors, which have in common their origin in neuroendocrine cells. The also very heterogeneous subgroup of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) is the best classified and investigated group. This article provides a systematic review of the current classification, diagnostics and treatment options of GEP-NEN. In order to achieve a better overview, it was consciously decided not to use an approach based on the primary localization. Instead, a thematic organization according to classification, clinical phenotype, diagnostics and treatment was chosen.

Incidence, treatment, and survival analysis in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma population

BACKGROUND

As a subtype of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ENENs), esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is rare. ENEC can be poorly differentiated and highly aggressive. This study aims to illustrate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of ENEC by using a population-based database.

METHODS

We collected clinicopathological data [1975-2016] of ENEC, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EACA), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and analyzed their incidence, treatment, and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 60,238 cases were in our study cohort, including ENEC (n=686), EACA (n=26,575), and ESqCC (n=32,977). The incidence of ENEC in 2016 was 0.044 per 100,000 persons. The tumor grade of ENEC was significantly higher than that of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of ENEC were significantly worse than those of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant improvement of CSS and OS by surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (all P<0.001). Besides, compared with monotherapies, combinational therapies brought more benefits to both CSS and OS of patients with ENEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our population-based evidence revealed that ENEC, as a rare cancer, had a worse prognosis, compared with EACA and ESqCC. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy can all improve the prognosis of ENEC patients. Combinational therapy can yield a better prognosis than monotherapy.

ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Background and Aim: Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rarely aggressive disease characterized by rapid progression, widespread metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study was aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum lipids for overall survival (OS) in SCCE patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed SCCE patients in a training cohort (61 patients) and validated them in a validation cohort (27 patients). These cases were collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2006 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were performed to determine serum lipids as prognostic factors associated with the patient's OS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to compare predictive power of independent prognostic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the prognostic factors were measured by the concordance index (C-index) and decision curve, and were compared with the TNM stage system. Results: On multivariate analysis of the training cohort, independent factors for survival were gender, BAR (ApoB/ApoA-1) and TNM stage. The area under the curve (AUC) of BAR+TNM stage in the training cohort was higher than that of TNM stage for OS, and similar result was observed in the validation cohort. The c-index of BAR+TNM stage for predicting the OS was 0.655 (95% CI = 0.571-0.740), which was higher than that of TNM stage [0.614 (95% CI = 0.530-0.698)] in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the C-index of the BAR+TNM stage for predicting OS was also higher than that of the TNM stage [0.688 (95% CI: 0.570~0.806) vs. (0.512; 95% CI: 0.392~0.632)]. In addition, decision curve analysis also showed that the predictive accuracy of BAR+TNM stage for OS was higher than TNM stage both in the training and the validation cohorts. Conclusions: BAR represents a promising prognostic indicator that might complement TNM stage in the prognosis of SCCE, and that warrant further assessment in large SCCE patient cohort.

Validation and proposed modification of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for patients with esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms: Evaluation of a revised lymph node classification

There is currently no universally accepted staging system for esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ENENs). In the present study, patients with ENENs, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (SEER) (n=191 patients) and the multicentric series (n=51 patients), were stratified to assess the validity of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems, particularly for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess disease-specific survival (DSS), according to the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) status, and the Cox model was applied to evaluate differences in prognosis after adjustment for potential confounders. For the 8th AJCC staging classifications, only the pathological stage groups (pTNM) conferred increased hazard ratios from stage I to stage IV, with overlaps between adjacent stages. According to the current findings, the regional lymph nodes involvement status other than the current N classification was a significant predictor of DSS. Consequently, a revised N(Nr) classification was proposed and therefore a new TNrM staging system was adopted, for which progressively poorer DSS associated with increasing stage was observed. Moreover, the concordance index with the modified staging system was slightly higher in patients with ENENs from the SEER registry compared with that of the 8th pTNM system. In conclusion, lymph node status, rather than the number of positive lymph nodes, was a marker of poorer DSS and the modified staging system provided an easier and more accurate staging tool. The present results indicate that revisions to the current staging classifications may be improve the assessment of patient prognosis.

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the upper digestive tract

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus and the stomach is aggressive. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Both clinicopathological factors and treatment results were examined in 34 patients with immunohistochemically diagnosed NEC of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus 22; stomach 12).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine tumors showed protruding and localized type, like submucosal tumor. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in six and eight patients, respectively. Among the six patients with esophageal NEC, three with node metastasis developed recurrence within seven months, while the other three (pT1bN0) had no recurrence. Regarding gastric NEC, three patients with pT3N1 or 2 tumor received adjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a 5-year survival. However, the other five experienced recurrence after gastrectomy. Systemic chemotherapy was performed as the main treatment for 18 patients with advanced NEC. The median survival was 10 months after initial chemotherapy. No marked differences in the response were recognized between the 14 cases with esophageal NEC and the 4 with gastric NEC. The median survival was 14.3 and 5.3 months for the 11 effective and 7 non-effective patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A macroscopically unique appearance, like submucosal tumor, suggests the possibility of NEC. Esophagectomy is an effective treatment option for limited-stage NEC without node metastasis, while gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective for NEC even with node metastasis when R0 resection can be achieved. Systemic chemotherapy is relatively effective for advanced NEC, although early progression frequently develops.

A competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis for cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

The objective of this study is to estimate the probability of cause-specific mortality using a competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis in a large population-based cohort of patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The surveillance, epidemiology and end results database was used to identify 162 patients diagnosed with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma from 1998 to 2014. We estimated a cumulative incidence function for cause-specific mortality. A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional subdistribution hazard model, validated using bootstrap cross-validation, and evaluated with a decision curve analysis to assess its clinical utility. Finally, we performed risk stratification using a recursive partitioning analysis to divide patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma into clinically useful prognostic groups. Tumor location, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with cause-specific mortality. The calibration plots demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes. The discrimination performance of a Fine-Gray model was evaluated by using the c-index, which was 0.723 for cause-specific mortality. The decision curve analysis ranged from 0.268 to 0.968 for the threshold probability at which the risk model provided net clinical benefits relative to hypothetical all-screening and no-screening scenarios. The risk groups stratified by a recursive partitioning analysis allowed significant distinction between cumulative incidence curves. We determined the probability of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and developed a nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis stratification system based on a competing-risks model. The nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis appear to be suitable for risk stratification of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and will help clinicians to identify patients at increased risk of cause-specific mortality to guide treatment and surveillance decisions.

The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: a single-center study of 53 resection cases

Background

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are exceedingly rare and poorly understood. The aims of the retrospective study were to delineate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with the disease.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study containing 53 patients of esophageal NECs in our center from 2002 through 2018. Patients were assigned to the pure esophageal NECs group and the esophageal NECs mixed with squamous carcinoma and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (MiNECs) group. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and prognostic factors were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Of the 53 patients, elderly male patients were predominant. Dysphagia was the most common symptom (45/53, 84.9%). Most tumors were centered in the middle esophagus (36/53,67.9%).Ulcerated appearance was frequently seen in the pure NECs (56.8%), and the tumors in the MiNECs group mostly represented elevated types (57.9%). Synaptophysin (38/45, 84.4%), chromogranin A (21/38, 55.3%) and CD56(23/27, 85.2%) have been proven to be positive markers for NECs. Most patients (46/53, 86.8%) received surgery combined with chemotherapy. Though the pathologic stages were alike (P = 0.129), the median survival time was 3.53 years for the pure NECs group and 7 years for the MiNECs group. In multivariate analysis, pathologic stage (RR = 1.938, P = 0.045) and age (RR = 2.410, P = 0.028) were independent prognostic factors for patients with MiNECs. The prognosis of patients with pure NECs was independent from any factors.

Conclusions

Careful endoscopic examination could help distinguish pure NECs from MiNECs. NECs were aggressive, but a relative better prognosis for patients with MiNECs. Surgery should be performed if applicable, and chemotherapy might be helpful.

Is There a Role for Surgery in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus? A Contemporary View from the NCDB

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (eNETs) are exceedingly rare, aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Treatment guidelines are ill-defined and mainly based on evidence from case reports and analogous experiences drawn from similar disease sites.

METHODS

The NCDB was reviewed for histologically confirmed stage I-III, primary eNETs from 2006 to 2014. Patients were grouped into whether or not they underwent primary tumor resection. Univariate, multivariable, and full bipartite propensity score (PS) adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall and relative survival differences.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were identified. Mean age was 65.0 (standard deviation [SD] 11.9) years, and 174 (69.6%) patients were male. Most patients had stage III disease (n = 136, 54.4%), and the most common type of NET was small cell eNET (n = 111, 44.4%). Chemotherapy was used in 186 (74.4%), radiation therapy in 178 (71.2%), and oncological resection was performed in 69 (27.6%) patients. Crude 2-year survival rates were higher in the operated (57.3%) compared with the nonoperated group (35.2%; p < 0.001). The survival benefit held true after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.69, p < 0.001). After full bipartite PS adjustment analysis, survival was longer for patients who received a surgical resection compared with those who did not (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75, p = 0.003) with a corresponding 2-year overall survival rate of 63.3% (95% CI 52.0-77.2) versus 38.8% (95% CI 30.9-48.8), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment that includes surgery is associated with better overall survival for eNETs. Additional research is needed to more definitively identify patients who benefit from esophagectomy and to establish an appropriate treatment algorithm.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus with an adenocarcinoma component

A 68-year-old male was referred with dysphagia. Endoscopic findings showed circular stenosis with a protruding mass in the lower esophagus. Biopsy showed adenocarcinoma and there was no evidence of distant metastases. A subtotal esophagectomy was performed. The resected specimen revealed a mixed neuroendocrine carcinoma with adenocarcinoma. The adenocarcinoma component was on the surface of the tumor and the neuroendocrine component invaded the deeper portion. Immunohistochemically, the neuroendocrine carcinoma component stained positive for cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20, suggesting that the neuroendocrine carcinoma originated from the adenocarcinoma. The adenocarcinoma component stained positive for MUC2, which suggests that the adenocarcinoma component originated from Barrett's epithelium. Taken together, the neuroendocrine carcinoma may have originated from Barrett's epithelium. A metastasis to the liver was found 2 months after the surgical resection. Chemotherapy was administered, but there was no response. Most esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas are accompanied by adenocarcinoma or squamous cell components, suggesting that these carcinomas originate from pluripotent cells in squamous or Barrett's epithelium. Appropriate chemotherapy for these lesions should be considered based on the cell of origin.

Systematic review of case reports of Japanese esophageal neuroendocrine cell carcinoma in the Japanese literature

Esophageal neuroendocrine cell carcinoma (NEC) is extremely rare, and its treatment strategy has not been established. Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to assess the treatment and prognosis of patients with esophageal NEC in Japan. The Ichushi-Web database was searched from January 1964 to May 2018. In total, 141 cases of esophageal NEC were included in the analysis. The survival of the chemotherapy group with stage II/III esophageal NEC was better than that of the surgery group. Meanwhile, the survival of the adjuvant treatment group with stage II/III esophageal NEC was significantly better than that of the surgery alone group. In patients with stage IV esophageal NEC, no significant differences were observed in terms of treatment response from the three regimens: irinotecan/platinum and etoposide/platinum compared with 5-fluorouracil/platinum. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the survival of patients who received the chemotherapy regimens. However, the 2-year survival rates of the irinotecan/platinum (26%) group and etoposide/platinum (27%) group were higher than that of the 5-fluorouracil/platinum (0%) group. In esophageal NEC, chemotherapy may be used as the first-line treatment. Irinotecan/platinum or etoposide/platinum can be the first-line regimen for chemotherapy. However, the additive effects of surgery remain unclear.

The Role of Surgery in Treating Resectable Limited Disease of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignant tumor. The role of surgery in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC remains unclear. How to select a specific group of limited disease of esophageal NEC who might benefit from surgery remains to be answered.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC in our department from January 2007 to June 2015 were analyzed. TNM staging system was applied to describe those patients, and according to their different long-term prognosis after surgery, those patients were subgrouped into surgery response limited disease (SRLD) group and surgery non-response limited disease (SNRLD) group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC were identified for analysis. The median survival time of those patients was 21.5 months. There was no significant survival differences among stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients, but all these patients had significantly longer survival than stage III patients. Therefore, stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients were aggregated together as SRLD group, and stage III patients were aggregated as SNRLD group. SRLD patients obtained significantly longer survival than SNRLD patients in both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Moreover, adjuvant therapy could significantly benefit SRLD patients (P = 0.004) but could not benefit SNRLD patients (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSIONS

Different responses to surgery existed in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC indicating the need of further subgrouping for those patients. The resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC could be further subgrouped into SRLD group and SNRLD group according to the TNM staging system.

The Problem of High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and Beyond

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors or poorly differentiated small/large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Distinguishing these entities relies on different genetic backgrounds and resulting different biology. The new classification creates several problems. Almost all clinical treatment data on neuroendocrine neoplasms do not stratify between well and poorly differentiated, providing insufficient help in treatment selection. Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms should separate between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinoma, and depends on primary tumor site, stage, proliferation rate, and clinical course. This article addresses how to diagnose and treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, focusing on well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors versus neuroendocrine carcinomas.

A neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett's esophagus: a case report and literature review

Background

An esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus is extremely rare. Here, we report a case of an esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett’s esophagus and review the literature.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old man with no symptoms was admitted to our hospital because of the detection of an esophagogastric junction tumor on regular upper endoscopy screening. Endoscopy revealed a sliding hiatal hernia and an approximately 10 mm elevated mass at the esophagogastric junction. Biopsy showed a moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography did not indicate lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis. Proximal gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection was performed along with jejunal interposition. On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor was positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin. Ki-67 was positive in 40% of the tumor cells. The histological diagnosis was a neuroendocrine carcinoma with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma component arising in Barrett’s esophagus. The postoperative course was good, and the patient was discharged on the twentieth postoperative day. He has remained free of the disease at 36 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

Barrett’s esophagus may be related to the development of a neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Esophageal Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Inconsistent Response to Treatment in the Primary and Metastatic Lesions

Esophageal large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignant tumor that is characterized by high-grade malignancy and a poor prognosis. However, the rarity of esophageal NEC has prevented the development of an established treatment, and no reports have described a discrepancy in the effectiveness of cisplatin plus irinotecan between primary and metastatic lesions. A 43-year-old Japanese man was referred to our hospital with refractory epigastralgia. A previous gastrointestinal endoscopy had revealed a 50-mm type 2 tumor in the abdominal esophagus. The pathological findings indicated poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a metastatic liver tumor. One cycle of fluorouracil and cisplatin was not effective, and endoscopy was repeatedly performed. The pathological findings indicated a large-cell malignant tumor with tumor cells that were positive for CD56, synaptophysin, and Ki-67 (> 80%). Based on a diagnosis of esophageal large-cell NEC with a metastatic liver tumor, the patient received cisplatin plus irinotecan biweekly. After 4 months, computed tomography revealed marked shrinkage of the metastatic tumor, but the patient complained of dysphagia. Endoscopy revealed enlargement of the primary tumor, which was then treated using radiotherapy plus fluorouracil and cisplatin. The primary tumor subsequently shrank, and the patient's symptoms were relieved, but the metastatic tumor grew. Thus, chemoradiotherapy could be an option for managing a primary esophageal large-cell NEC that does not respond to chemotherapy alone. However, the possibility of an inconsistent response to therapy in primary and metastatic lesions should be considered.

High-grade Non-small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Esophagus

High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus is an extremely aggressive and rare disease, which is still not well understood. In this case report, we discuss a 73-year-old male patient that presented with the sole complaint of dysphagia to solid foods. During our evaluation of the patient, a six-centimeter esophageal mass was found on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). A diagnosis of poorly differentiated (high-grade) non-small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was made after a histological analysis and immunostaining. We attempted to highlight the diagnosis, evaluation process, and treatment options related to this entity. Our review of the literature revealed that further research is needed, focusing on neuroendocrine carcinomas of the esophagus and how this entity differs from some of the more well-known neuroendocrine neoplasms in terms of management.

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumor with initial presentation as painless forehead and neck masses: A case report

RATIONALE

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare type of esophageal tumor which are usually positive for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56 in tumor immunohistochemical staining. The most common symptoms of esophageal NETs are gastrointestinal symptoms such as dysphagia and/or abdominal discomfort. While esophageal NETs have the potential for distant metastasis, there have only been a few reports of brain metastasis originating from esophageal NET.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report the case of a 60-year-old Taiwanese female who initially presented with a 1 month history of painless forehead and bilateral neck masses. She did not complain of any other symptoms, which complicated the diagnosis.

DIAGNOSES

Chest and abdominal computed tomography were arranged for a thorough evaluation, and a paraesophageal lesion as well as multiple metastases in the liver, bilateral adrenal glands, and bone were found. Panendoscopy and pathology confirmed the diagnosis of an esophageal NET.

INTERVENTIONS

Best supportive care.

OUTCOMES

The clinical course of this case deteriorated drastically, and she died of tumor progression 10 days after the diagnosis had been made.

LESSONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article in the literature to report a case of esophageal NET whose initial presentation was painless forehead and bilateral neck masses. Clinicians should be aware of the early signs and symptoms of esophageal NET to allow for a prompt diagnosis.

Diagnosis and Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Upper gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors which are increasingly recognised by practising endoscopists. After confirmation by endoscopic biopsies of these focal lesions, many questions may arise. As NETs are less frequently encountered compared to other malignancies or gastrointestinal pathology, many endoscopists may not fully understand the natural history, diagnosis and management of these tumors. In this review, we aim to update the practising endoscopist on the key clinical features and management of patients with upper gastrointestinal NET.

High expression of Ki-67 is an independent favorable prognostic factor for esophageal small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) has not been explored in any previous studies. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in SCCE for the first time.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included for analysis. The baseline clinicopathological data of these SCCE patients shared similar characteristics with previous studies. Ten patients were at stage I, 17 at stage II, and the remaining 17 were at stage III. Postoperatively, 23 patients received adjuvant therapy. Twenty-eight patients were found to have a high expression of Ki-67 (> 50%). After a median follow-up time of 54.8 months, the median survival time of those patients was 22.1 months. Early TNM stage, application of adjuvant therapy, and high expression of Ki-67 (Hazard Ratio = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.127-0.774; P = 0.012) were found to be favorable prognostic factors of patients with SCCE. In subgroup analysis, adjuvant therapy could only bring significant survival benefit for patients with high expression of Ki-67 (P = 0.008).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for SCCE from January 2009 to January 2015 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Data for analysis included demographic data, pathologic findings, tumor stage, adjuvant therapy, and survival time as well as Ki-67 index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that high expression of Ki-67 may not only serve as a favorable prognostic factor of SCCE but also an indication of providing adjuvant therapy for SCCE patients with surgical resection.

Characterization of tissue chromogranin A (CgA) immunostaining and clinicohistopathological changes for the 125 Chinese patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

The rarity of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCE) has limited the clinical feature and survival analysis with large sample size. Tissue chromogranin A (CgA) protein expression has been reported to be a useful biomarker for diagnosing PSCE. Interestingly, recent studies have indicated tissue CgA as a significant prognostic marker in multiple human cancers, but without PSCE. The present study, thus, was undertaken to characterize the clinicopathological changes and to evaluate the associations of tissue CgA expression with clinical response on Chinese PSCE patients. All the 125 PSCE patients were enrolled from our 500,000 esophageal and gastric cardia carcinoma databases (1973-2015), constructed by the cooperative team from more than 700 hospitals in China and established by Henan Key Laboratory for Esophageal Cancer Research in Henan, China. Immunostaining for CgA showed that CgA was mainly located in cytoplasm of tumor cells with a positive detection rate of 44.6%. The CgA positive expression rate in PSCE at lower segment of the esophagus (72.2%) was higher than that at middle segment (41.5%) (P = 0.001). However, CgA protein expression did not correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.767), TNM staging (P = 0.740), tumor invasion (P = 0.253), gender (P = 0.262), and age (P = 0.250). Multivariate survival analysis showed that the patients with higher CgA protein expression had a superior long survival than those without CgA expression (P = 0.037). The clinicopathological analysis showed that PSCE occurred predominantly in male (M:F = 1.9:1) at the middle segment (68%) of the esophagus. Histologically, 89.6% were pure PSCE and 10.4% were mixed type with either squamous cell carcinoma (8%) or adenocarcinoma (2.4%). It was noteworthy that, with the in-depth invasion from T1 to T2 and T3, the positive lymph node metastasis rate increased dramatically from 38%, 56% to 74%, respectively. The survival rates of 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year were 64%, 35%, 18%, and 7%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the young patients (≤60 years) had longer survival than the elderly (P = 0.011). Interestingly, multivariate survival analysis revealed that the patients with mixed PSCE had a significantly better survival than those with pure PSCE (P = 0.015). Furthermore, the median survival time for the patients with and without lymph node metastasis was 1.16 and 2.03 years, respectively. But, the difference was not significant (P = 0.143). Univariate analysis did not show any survival influence by gender, tumor location, tumor invasion depth, and TNM staging. It was noteworthy that, of the 13 early PSCE patients (T1N0M0), only one patient had more than 5 year survival, the others died with less than one or two year (65%). The present study indicates that the PSCE is of badly worsen prognosis, even in the pathological early stage. Tissue CgA protein expression is a promising maker not only for diagnosis and also for prognosis. Further assessment is needed to establish specific PSCE pathological staging system and to clarify the mechanisms of CgA protein in PSCE progression and prognosis.