Complete resection of the primary lesion improves survival of certain patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Distinguishing optimal candidates for primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A predictive model based on propensity score matching

Background

Primary tumor resection is associated with survival benefits in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (mLUAD). However, there are no established methods to determine which individuals would benefit from surgery. Therefore, we developed a model to predict the patients who are likely to benefit from surgery in terms of survival.

Methods

Data on patients with mLUAD were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Depending on whether surgery was performed on the primary tumor, patients were categorized into two groups: cancer-directed surgery (CDS) and no-cancer-directed surgery (No-CDS). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was utilized to address bias between the CDS and No-CDS groups. The prognostic impact of CDS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Subsequently, we constructed a nomogram to predict the potential for surgical benefits based on multivariable logistic regression analysis using preoperative factors.

Results

A total of 89,039 eligible patients were identified, including 6.4% (5705) who underwent surgery. Following PSM, the CDS group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) compared with the No-CDS group (23 [21-25] vs. 7 [7-8] months; P < 0.001). The nomogram showed robust performance in both the training and validation sets (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.698 and 0.717, respectively), and the calibration curves exhibited high consistency. The nomogram proved clinically valuable according to decision curve analysis (DCA). According to this nomogram, surgical patients were categorized into two groups: no-benefit candidates and benefit candidates groups. Compared with the no-benefit candidate group, the benefit candidate group was associated with longer survival (mOS: 25 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001). Furthermore, no difference in survival was observed between the no-benefit candidates and the no-surgery groups (mOS: 6 vs. 7 months, P = 0.9).

Conclusions

A practical nomogram was developed to identify optimal CDS candidates among patients with mLUAD.

The surgical resection of the primary tumor increases survival in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a tertiary center cohort study

Tumor resection could increase treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC from a Taiwanese tertiary center and receiving EGFR-TKI treatment with or without tumor resection. A total of 349 patients were enrolled. After propensity score matching, 53 EGFR-TKI treated patients and 53 EGFR-TKI treated patients with tumor resection were analyzed. The tumor resection group showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) (52.0 vs. 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.19; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 30.6 months; HR = 0.14; p < 0.001) compared to the monotherapy group. In the subgroup analysis of patients with newly-diagnosed NSCLC, the tumor resection group showed longer PFS (52.0 vs. 9.9 months; HR = 0.14; p < 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 32.6 months; HR = 0.12; p < 0.001) than the monotherapy group. In conclusion. the combination of EGFR-TKI and tumor resection provided better PFS and OS than EGFR-TKI alone, and patients who underwent tumor resection within six months had fewer co-existing genomic alterations and better PFS.

The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection on Primary Tumor Resection for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Objective

Selected patients with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent primary tumor resection have witnessed a survival benefit. Whether additional lymph node dissection (LND) would result in a better effect remain unknown. We investigated the prognostic impact of LND on patients with stage IV NSCLC who received primary tumor resection (PTR).

Methods

Patients with stage IV NSCLC who underwent PTR were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2016. Propensity-score matching was performed to minimize the confounding effect, and lung cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared after matching. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors and to adjust for covariates in subgroup analysis. The effect of the number of lymph nodes examined on the CSS was evaluated by repeating the Cox analysis in a binary method.

Results

A total of 4,114 patients with stage IV NSCLC who receive surgery met our criteria, of which 2,622 (63.73%) underwent LND and 628 patients were identified 1:1 in LND and non-LND groups after matching. Compared with the non-LND group, the LND group had a longer CSS (median: 23 vs. 16 months, p < 0.001) and OS (median: 21 vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression showed that LND was independently associated with favorable CCS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.89, P < 0.001] and OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that LND is an independent favorable predictor to survival in the surgical patients who were older age (>60 years old), female, T3-4, N0, and M1a stage and those who underwent sublobar resection. In addition, a statistically significant CCS benefit was associated with an increasing number of lymph nodes examined through 25 lymph nodes.

Conclusions

LND with a certain range of lymph nodes number examined was associated with improved survival for patients with stage IV NSCLC who received primary tumor resection. The results may have implications for guidelines on lymph nodes management in selective advanced NSCLC for surgery.

Primary Tumor Resection for Stage IV Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Without Progression After First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

In studies of stage IV epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), <10% of patients underwent surgery; thus, the effect of surgery in these patients remains unclear. We investigated whether primary lung tumor resection could improve the survival of patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC without progression after first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs without progression on follow-up imaging. Patients in the surgery group (n = 56) underwent primary tumor resection, followed by TKI maintenance therapy. Patients in the control group (n = 224; matched for age, metastatic status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) received only TKI maintenance therapy. Local ablative therapy for distant metastasis was allowed in both groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, failure patterns, and complications/adverse events.

RESULTS

The median time from TKI treatment to surgery was 5.1 months. For the surgery and control groups, the median follow-up periods were 34.0 and 38.5 months, respectively, with a median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival of 29.6 (18.9-40.3) and 13.0 (11.8-14.2) months, respectively (P < 0.001). Progression occurred in 29/56 (51.8%) and 207/224 (92.4%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival in the surgery group was not reached. The rate of surgical complications of grade ≥2 was 12.5%; complications were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor resection is feasible for patients with EGFR-mutant nonprogressed NSCLC during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment and may improve survival better than maintenance EGFR-TKI therapy alone.

Surgical Survival Benefits With Different Metastatic Patterns for Stage IV Extrathoracic Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

Background:

With the knowledge of oligometastases, primary surgery plays an increasingly vital role in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of primary surgery based on metastatic patterns.

Materials and Methods:

The selected patients with stage IV extrathoracic metastatic (m1b) non-small cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multiple imputation was used for the missing data. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether surgery was performed. After covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) weighting, multivariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were built to identify the survival benefit of different metastatic patterns.

Results:

Surgery can potentially increase the overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR: 0.68, P < 0.001) of non-small cell lung cancer. The weighted 3-year OS in the surgical group was 16.9%, compared with 7.8% in the nonsurgical group. For single organ metastasis, surgery could improve the survival of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Meanwhile, no significant survival improvements in surgical group were observed in patients with multiple organ metastases.

Conclusion:

The surgical survival benefits for extrathoracic metastatic non-small cell lung cancer could be divided by metastatic pattern.

Outcomes of local thoracic surgery in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A SEER-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of thoracic surgery for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are controversial and uncertain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results was queried for patients with stage IV NSCLC, including those treated with surgery-participated therapy modalities. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a variety of statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis was carried out for 90,982 patients from 1975 to 2016 who had been diagnosed as stage IV NSCLC. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analyses that were well-balanced with all the important confounding covariates revealed improved OS (median survival time [MST]) with patients receiving surgery versus non-surgery (MST: 15 versus 8 months, P < 0.001); undergoing surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (MST: 19 versus 11 months, P < 0.001); and having surgery plus chemoradiation versus chemoradiation (MST: 18 versus 11 months, P < 0.001). Sequential landmark analyses for long-term survivors of ≥1 and ≥3 years all indicated improved OS (P < 0.001) on univariate and multivariate analyses for the patients receiving the three surgery-related treatment patterns listed earlier, relative to the corresponding surgery-absent treatment modalities. For synchronous presentations of varied treatment paradigms, surgical intervention significantly led to increased OS (MST, months) benefits following treatment paradigms: surgery plus chemotherapy (22), surgery plus chemoradiation (18), chemotherapy (10), surgery only (9), chemoradiation (9), surgery plus radiation (6) and radiation alone (2). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the elevated OS associated with local thoracic surgery in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy) or chemoradiation (versus chemoradiation) fell in the subcategories of T0-3, N0-2 and 0-1 (metastatic sites) tumours. The comparison of the aforementioned two types of treatment patterns indicated that the optimal patients for the surgery were those with any combination of T1-4, N0-3, Msite0-1 and adeno- or squamous carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with T1-4, N0-3, Msite0-1 and adeno- or squamous carcinoma of stage IV NSCLC had a longer OS with local thoracic surgery in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Predictive factors related to pleural dissemination in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pleural dissemination is poor, and pleural dissemination is generally considered a contraindication for radical surgery. However, if pleural dissemination is missed intraoperatively, patients with false-negative stage IV NSCLC cannot receive appropriate chemotherapy, and their prognosis might worsen.

Methods

In the present study, we enrolled 144 patients who received surgery for NSCLC between January 2008 and December 2019 with available data on the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) on positron emission tomography (PET) with lesions adjacent to the visceral pleura and without lesions invading the chest wall.

Results

Seven patients who had pleural dissemination were compared with 137 patients who had not pleural dissemination. The relationships between pleural dissemination and the clinicopathological variables were analyzed, and significant differences in the histopathological type (P=0.03), and differentiation (P<0.01) were noted. It was suggested that squamous cell carcinoma tended not to show dissemination to the pleural cavity. The logistic regression analyses of the predictive factors related to pleural dissemination in non-squamous cell carcinoma patients were analyzed, and the age (P=0.01) and differentiation (P<0.01) were identified as significant predictive factors related to pleural dissemination.

Conclusions

Cases with non-squamous cell carcinoma, a young age, and poor differentiation of undifferentiated grade of histological differentiation are factors associated with early pleural cavity dissemination.

Primary Tumor Resection Is Associated with a Better Outcome among Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving EGFR-TKI Treatment

OBJECTIVES

The characteristics and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with primary tumor resection (PTR) is not yet clear.

METHODS

We enrolled advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy to access the impact of PTR on the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 466 patients were enrolled with 76 patients (16.3%) undergoing PTR; 59 patients recurred after curative surgery, while 17 patients underwent surgery as diagnostic purposes. PTR patients displayed a better performance status, a lower metastatic burden, and much less measurable diseases (30.3 vs. 97.4%, p < 0.001). PTR patients experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (25.1 [95% CI 16.6-33.7] vs. 9.4 [95% CI 8.4-10.4] months; aHR 0.40 [95% CI 0.30-0.54], p < 0.001) and overall survival (56.8 [95% CI 36.3-77.2] vs. 31.8 [95% CI 28.2-35.4] months; aHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39-0.84], p = 0.004). Survival advantage was still observed while comparing PTR patients with the better performance and lower metastatic burden subgroup found within the non-resection group. Moreover, the progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 patients who were found having pleural metastases during surgery and underwent PTR plus pleural biopsy, were also longer than those with pure N0--1/M1a-malignant pleural effusion disease in the non-resection group (n = 19) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

PTR was associated with significantly better outcomes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the biological role of PTR among these patients.

Extended resections for the treatment of patients with T4 stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (T4N0-1M0) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a 15-year two-center experience

Background

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of patients, often requiring variable and individualized approaches. The dilemma to operate or not frequently arises, since more than 75% of the cases of NSCLC are diagnosed in advanced stages (IIIA). The main objective of this study was to assess whether the benefits outweigh surgical risks for the T₄N_0-1M₀ subgroup.

Methods

Data from 857 patients with locally advanced T4 NSCLC were retrospectively collected from two different institutions, between 2002 and 2017. Clinical data that were retrieved and analyzed, included demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, neoadjuvant or/and adjuvant therapy and postoperative complications.

Results

Twelve patients were in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) group and thirty in the non-CPB. The most common types of lung cancer were squamous cell carcinoma (50.0%) and adenocarcinoma (35.7%). The most frequent invasion of the tumor was seen in main pulmonary artery and the superior vena cava. Significantly more patients of the CPB group underwent pneumonectomy as their primary lung resection (P=0.006). In all patients R0 resection was achieved according to histological reports. The overall 5-year survival was 60%, while the median overall survival was 22.5 months. Analysis revealed that patient age (P=0.027), preoperative chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P=0.001), tumor size (4.0 vs. 6.0 cm) (P=0.001), postoperative respiratory dysfunction (P=0.001) and postoperative atelectasis (P=0.036) are possible independent variables that are significantly correlated with patient outcome.

Conclusions

We suggest that in patients with stage IIIA/T4 NSCLC, complete resection of the T4 tumor, although challenging, can be performed in highly selected patients. Such an approach seems to result in improved long-term survival. More specific studies on this area of NSCLC probably will further enlighten this field, and may result in even better outcomes, as advanced systemic perioperative approaches such as modern chemotherapy, immunotherapy and improvements in radiation therapy have been incorporated in daily practice.

Imaging phenotype using radiomics to predict dry pleural dissemination in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Dry pleural dissemination (DPD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined as having solid pleural metastases without malignant pleural effusion. We aim to identify DPD by applying radiomics, a novel approach to decode the tumor phenotype.

Methods

Preoperative chest computed tomographic images and basic clinical feature were retrospectively evaluated in patients with surgically resected NSCLC between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. Propensity score was applied to match the DPD and non-DPD groups. One thousand and eighty radiomics features were quantitatively extracted by the 3D slicer software and "pyradiomics" package. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) binary model was applied for feature selection and developing the radiomics signature. The discrimination was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and Youden index.

Results

Sixty-four DPD patients and paired 192 non-DPD patients were enrolled. Using the LASSO model, this study developed a radiomics signature including 10 radiomic features. The mean ± standard deviation values of the radiomics signature with DPD status (-2.129±1.444) was significantly higher compared to those with non-DPD disease (0.071±0.829, P<0.001). The ten-feature based signature showed good discrimination between DPD and non-DPD, with an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence-interval, 0.891-0.958) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics signature was 85.94% and 85.94%, with the optimal cut-off value of -0.696 and Youden index of 0.71.

Conclusions

The signature based on radiomics features can provide potential predictive value to identify DPD in patients with NSCLC.