Outcomes of local thoracic surgery in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A SEER-based analysis

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of thoracic surgery for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are controversial and uncertain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results was queried for patients with stage IV NSCLC, including those treated with surgery-participated therapy modalities. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using a variety of statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis was carried out for 90,982 patients from 1975 to 2016 who had been diagnosed as stage IV NSCLC. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analyses that were well-balanced with all the important confounding covariates revealed improved OS (median survival time [MST]) with patients receiving surgery versus non-surgery (MST: 15 versus 8 months, P < 0.001); undergoing surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (MST: 19 versus 11 months, P < 0.001); and having surgery plus chemoradiation versus chemoradiation (MST: 18 versus 11 months, P < 0.001). Sequential landmark analyses for long-term survivors of ≥1 and ≥3 years all indicated improved OS (P < 0.001) on univariate and multivariate analyses for the patients receiving the three surgery-related treatment patterns listed earlier, relative to the corresponding surgery-absent treatment modalities. For synchronous presentations of varied treatment paradigms, surgical intervention significantly led to increased OS (MST, months) benefits following treatment paradigms: surgery plus chemotherapy (22), surgery plus chemoradiation (18), chemotherapy (10), surgery only (9), chemoradiation (9), surgery plus radiation (6) and radiation alone (2). The subgroup analysis demonstrated that the elevated OS associated with local thoracic surgery in addition to chemotherapy (versus chemotherapy) or chemoradiation (versus chemoradiation) fell in the subcategories of T0-3, N0-2 and 0-1 (metastatic sites) tumours. The comparison of the aforementioned two types of treatment patterns indicated that the optimal patients for the surgery were those with any combination of T1-4, N0-3, Msite0-1 and adeno- or squamous carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with T1-4, N0-3, Msite0-1 and adeno- or squamous carcinoma of stage IV NSCLC had a longer OS with local thoracic surgery in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiation.

Development and validation of prognostic nomograms in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Predicting the prognosis of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is difficult, due to its unpredictable behavior. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a nomogram to predict survival outcomes in patients with ACC.

METHODS

Nomograms were established using the data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Based on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we identified independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Concordance indexes (c-indexes), the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate predictive performance of these models. The clinical use of nomogram was measured by decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves.

RESULTS

A total of 855 eligible patients, randomly divided into training (n = 600) and validation cohorts (n = 255), were included in this study. Based on the independent predictors, the nomograms were established and demonstrated good discriminative abilities, with C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.762 and 0.765 in training cohorts and 0.738 and 0.758 in validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC and calibration plots also demonstrated a good performance for both nomograms. DCA indicated that the two nomograms provide clinical net benefits.

CONCLUSION

We unveiled the prognostic factors of ACC and developed novel nomograms that predict OS and CSS more accurately and comprehensively, which can help clinicians improve individual treatment, making proper clinical decisions and adjusting follow-up management strategies.

One in five hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the United States are Hispanic while less than 40% were eligible for liver transplantation

AIM

To evaluate trends and disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes among Hispanic patients in the United States with a focus on tumor stage at diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all Hispanic adults (age > 20) with HCC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 using United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data. Tumor stage was assessed by SEER-specific staging systems and whether HCC was within Milan criteria at diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression models evaluated for predictors of HCC within Milan criteria at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, Hispanics accounted for 19.8% of all HCC (73.3% men, 60.9% had Medicare or commercial insurance, 33.5% Medicaid, and 5.6% uninsured). Thirty-eight percent of Hispanic HCC patients were within Milan criteria at diagnosis. With latter time periods, significantly more patients were diagnosed with HCC within Milan criteria, and in 2013-2014, 42.6% had HCC within Milan criteria. On multivariate regression, Hispanic males (OR vs females: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.68-0.83, P < 0.001), Hispanics > 65 years (OR vs age < 50: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.58-0.79, P < 0.001), and uninsured patients (OR vs Medicare/commercial: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.40-0.59, P < 0.001) were significantly less likely to have HCC within Milan criteria at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

While one in five HCC patients in the United States are of Hispanic ethnicity, only 38% were within Milan criteria at time of diagnosis, and thus over 60% were ineligible for liver transplantation, one of the primary curative options for HCC patients. Improved efforts at HCC screening and surveillance are needed among this group to improve early detection.