Medical management of bronchiectasis

Real-world disease burden, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization associated with bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVES

To assess real-world survival and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in US patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis, using data from the STATinMED RWD Insights database from Jan 2015-Oct 2022, included adults with NCFBE (from Jan 2015-Oct 2021) and non-NCFBE comparators (from Jan 2015-Aug 2020); baseline characteristics were balanced by inverse probability treatment weighting. Outcomes included survival through end of study. HCRU was assessed over 12 months.

RESULTS

117,718 patients with NCFBE and 306,678 comparators were included. Patients with NCFBE had a 77% higher risk of death than comparators (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77 [95% CI 1.74-1.80]). Risk of death was higher among patients aged ≥65 years (vs 18-34 years; HR 11.03 [95% CI 10.36-11.74]), among Black patients (vs White; HR 1.53 [95% CI 1.50-1.55]), and among patients with comorbid COPD (HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.40-1.44]). Patients with NCFBE incurred higher all-cause and respiratory-related HCRU than comparators for outpatient office, outpatient hospital, emergency department (ED), inpatient and respiratory-related pulmonologist visits (all p < .0001); HCRU increased with exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NCFBE have high mortality burden and incur high HCRU, both of which are further increased with exacerbations. Prevention and delay of exacerbations are key areas for improvement of disease management.

Navigating a Complex Case of Hypoplastic Right Lung With Bronchiectasis: A Ten-Year Journey

Unilateral pulmonary hypoplasia (UPH) is a rare congenital disorder that presents rarely in adulthood. Most patients succumb to complications at a young age, and those who survive are rare and susceptible to frequent lifelong pulmonary infections. It has a high infant mortality rate. We present the case of a 66-year-old male with rheumatoid arthritis and severe persistent asthma who first presented to our emergency department in 2013 with worsening shortness of breath. Chest imaging with a computed tomography (CT) scan revealed right hemithorax volume loss with hypoplasia, honeycomb lung formation, and right mediastinal shift. He was treated with prednisone, inhalers, and antibiotics for asthmatic bronchitis. He continued to suffer frequent hospital admissions (56 to our hospital alone) over the next decade for pneumonia and asthma exacerbations. The hypoplastic right lung was deemed to be contributing to recurrent infections/inflammation, and he is currently being re-evaluated for a right pneumonectomy, as surgical resection is an option for localized bronchiectasis associated with recurrent respiratory infections.

Real-world treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in a US Medicare population with bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis carries a significant economic burden with high health care expenditures associated with frequent hospitalizations, physician visits, and treatments, including oral and intravenous antibiotics for repeated lung infections, airway-clearance therapy, and oxygen administration. Bronchiectasis exacerbations can contribute to this burden.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate US health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with bronchiectasis and with bronchiectasis exacerbations.

METHODS

This retrospective study used the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service database (January 2014 to December 2020) to compare HCRU and costs among patients with bronchiectasis with those of patients without bronchiectasis (controls). For patients with bronchiectasis, the index date was a randomly selected bronchiectasis claim after more than 1 year of disease history and, for controls, a claim closest to their matched bronchiectasis patient's index date. All patients had continuous enrollment for at least 12 months pre-index (baseline) and at least 12 months post-index. Primary outcomes were all-cause, respiratory-related, and bronchiectasis-related HCRU and health care costs, which were presented by the overall sample and by segmented patient cohorts based on the number of exacerbations during baseline (0, 1, or ≥2).

RESULTS

92,529 patients with bronchiectasis (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [8.8] years; 72.3% female) and 92,529 matched controls qualified for the study. Compared with controls, patients with bronchiectasis presented greater mean (SD) all-cause physician visits (15.4 [10.0] vs 13.2 [9.7]; P < 0.001) and respiratory-related physician visits (5.2 [4.3] vs 1.9 [3.1]), pulmonologist visits (1.9 [2.2] vs 0.3 [1.0]), hospitalizations (0.4 [0.9] vs 0.3 [0.8]), emergency department visits (0.33 [1.0] vs 0.26 [1.0]), and total health care costs ($10,224 [$23,263] vs $6,704 [$19,593]). Respiratory-related HCRU was also greater in patients with more baseline exacerbations, with total health care costs of $8,506, $10,365, and $14,790 for patients with 0, 1, and at least 2 exacerbations, respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrates the high disease burden associated with bronchiectasis and with exacerbations, highlighting the need to improve management and reduce exacerbations.

Construction of a panoramic mRNA map of adult noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and a preliminary study of the underlying molecular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in adults is complex, and the relevant molecular mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we constructed a panoramic map of bronchiectasis mRNA, explored the potential molecular mechanisms, and identified potential therapeutic targets, thus providing a new clinical perspective for the preventive management of bronchiectasis and its acute exacerbation.

METHODS

The mRNA profiles of peripheral blood and bronchiectasis tissues were obtained through transcriptome sequencing and public databases, and bioinformatics methods were used to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The DEGs were then subjected to biological function and pathway analyses. Some DEGs were validated using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in peripheral blood. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to analyse the correlation between DEGs and clinical indicators.

RESULTS

Based on transcriptome sequencing and public databases, the mRNA profile of bronchiectasis was determined. DEGs were obtained from the peripheral blood sequencing dataset (985 DEGs), tissue sequencing dataset (2919 DEGs), and GSE97258 dataset (1083 DEGs). Bioinformatics analysis showed that upregulated DEGs had enriched neutrophil-related pathways, and downregulated DEGs had enriched ribosome-related pathways. RT-qPCR testing confirmed the upregulated expression of VCAN, SESTD1, SLC12A1, CD177, IFI44L, SIGLEC1, and RSAD2 in bronchiectasis. These genes were related to many clinical parameters, such as neutrophils, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcriptomic methods were used to construct a panoramic map of bronchiectasis mRNA expression. The findings showed that neutrophil activation, chronic inflammation, immune regulation, impaired ribosomal function, oxidative phosphorylation, and energy metabolism disorders are important factors in the development of bronchiectasis. VCAN, SESTD1, SLC12A1, CD177, IFI44L, SIGLEC1, and RSAD2 may play important roles in the pathogenesis of bronchiectasis and are potential therapeutic targets.

Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy

Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.

Prognostic performance of the FACED score and bronchiectasis severity index in bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Bronchiectasis is a multidimensional lung disease characterized by bronchial dilation, chronic inflammation, and infection. The FACED (Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Age, Chronic colonization, Extension, and Dyspnea) score and Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) are used to stratify disease risk and guide clinical practice. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the accuracy of these two systems for predicting bronchiectasis outcomes.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant studies. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Pooled summary estimates, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate prognostic performance.

Results: We analyzed 17 unique cohorts (6525 participants) from ten studies. FACED scores with a cut-off value ≥ 5 predicted all-cause mortality better than BSI with a cut-off value ≥ 9, based on pooled sensitivity (0.34 vs 0.7), specificity (0.94 vs 0.66), PLR (4.76 vs 2.05), NLR (0.74 vs 0.48), DOR (6.67 vs 5.01), and AUC (0.87 vs 0.75). Both FACED scores with a cut-off value ≥ 5 (AUC = 0.82) and BSI scores with a cut-off value ≥ 5 or 9 (both AUC = 0.80) help to predict hospitalization.

Conclusions: At a cut-off value ≥ 5, FACED scores can reliably predict all-cause mortality and hospitalization, while BSI scores can reliably predict hospitalization with a cut-off of ≥5 or ≥9. Further studies are essential to validate the prognostic performance of these two scores.

Post-tuberculous lung disease: should we be using Theophylline?

Tuberculosis affects 10 million people and over 320,000 South Africans every year. A significant proportion of patients treated for tuberculosis develop post-tuberculous lung disease (PTBLD), a disease of chronic respiratory impairment for which there is a lack of affordable treatment options. PTBLD a heterogenous disorder that shares phenotypical features with chronic obstructive lung disease, bronchiectasis, lung fibrosis and destruction as well as pulmonary hypertension. There remains a paucity of proven pharmacotherapy for the management of PTBLD. Theophylline, a widely available and affordable medicine that has largely fell out of favour in high-income settings due to its toxicity and narrow therapeutic index, may be repositioned for the treatment of PTBLD. In this review, we unpack the potential role of theophylline in the management of PTBLD by reviewing the evidence for its bronchodilatory, anti-inflammatory and potential pleotrophic effects.

ERS International Congress 2020: highlights from the Paediatric Assembly

In this review, the Paediatric Assembly of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) presents a summary of the highlights and most relevant findings in the field of paediatric respiratory medicine presented at the virtual ERS International Congress 2020. Early Career Members of the ERS and Chairs of the different Groups comprising the Paediatric Assembly discuss a selection of the presented research. These cover a wide range of research areas, including respiratory physiology and sleep, asthma and allergy, cystic fibrosis, respiratory infection and immunology, neonatology and intensive care, epidemiology, bronchology and lung and airway development. Specifically, we describe the long-term effect in lung function of premature birth, mode of delivery and chronic respiratory conditions such as cystic fibrosis. In paediatric asthma, we present risk factors, phenotypes and their progression with age, and the challenges in diagnosis. We confirm the value of the lung clearance index to detect early lung changes in cystic fibrosis. For bronchiectasis treatment, we highlight the importance of identifying treatable traits. The use of biomarkers and genotypes to identify infants at risk of long-term respiratory morbidity is also discussed. We present the long-term impact on respiratory health of early life and fetal exposures to maternal obesity and intrauterine hypoxia, mechanical ventilation hyperoxia, aeroallergens, air pollution, vitamin A deficient intake and bronchitis. Moreover, we report on the use of metabolomics and genetic analysis to understand the effect of these exposures on lung growth and alveolar development. Finally, we stress the need to establish multidisciplinary teams to treat complex airway pathologies.

Clinical correlates of nocardiosis

Nocardia is an opportunistic pathogen that most frequently affects the lungs. Evidence is limited regarding the risk factors for nocardiosis. The current study assessed clinical correlates of nocardiosis. A retrospective study was conducted based on medical records of consecutive adult patients (N = 60) with nocardiosis hospitalized during 2007–2018 at a tertiary hospital in central Israel. A matched comparison group of 120 patients was randomly selected among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were fitted. Immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy was positively associated with nocardiosis (matched odds ratio [OR] 4.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–8.62, p < 0.001), particularly corticosteroid therapy (matched OR 4.69, 95% CI 2.45–8.99, p < 0.001). Systemic corticosteroid therapy was strongly associated with pulmonary nocardiosis (matched OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.75–12.66, p < 0.001). The positive association between solid organ transplantation and nocardiosis was attenuated following adjustment for systemic corticosteroids in a multivariable model. The association between corticosteroid therapy and nocardiosis appeared stronger in patients with chronic pulmonary disease (OR 5.74, 95% CI 2.75–12.66, p < 0.001) than in the pooled analysis of all nocardiosis cases. In conclusion, corticosteroid therapy was strongly correlated with nocardiosis, particularly among individuals with chronic pulmonary disease and in pulmonary nocardiosis.

Bronchiectasis in Primary Antibody Deficiencies: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Bronchiectasis, the presence of bronchial wall thickening with airway dilatation, is a particularly challenging complication of primary antibody deficiencies. While susceptibility to infections may be the primary factor leading to the development of bronchiectasis in these patients, the condition may develop in the absence of known infections. Once bronchiectasis is present, the lungs are subject to a progressive cycle involving both infectious and non-infectious factors. If bronchiectasis is not identified or not managed appropriately, the cycle proceeds unchecked and yields advanced and permanent lung damage. Severe symptoms may limit exercise tolerance, require frequent hospitalizations, profoundly impair quality of life (QOL), and lead to early death. This review article focuses on the appropriate identification and management of bronchiectasis in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. The underlying immune deficiency and the bronchiectasis need to be treated from combined immunology and pulmonary perspectives, reflected in this review by experts from both fields. An aggressive multidisciplinary approach may reduce exacerbations and slow the progression of permanent lung damage.

Nocardia colonization in contrast to nocardiosis: a comparison of patients' clinical characteristics

Information on Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract is scarce. The current study is aimed at comparing clinical characteristics between individuals with Nocardia colonization and those with nocardiosis. All patients with Nocardia isolation between 2007 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Israel were included. Nocardia isolation was based on biochemical tests together with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance patterns until 2011 and on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer from 2012. We defined nocardiosis as a clinically evident infection related to the isolation of the bacteria, which required antibiotic therapy. We defined colonization as Nocardia isolation with no clinical evidence of disease. The medical charts of all included individuals were independently reviewed by an infectious disease specialist to ensure adequate classification. Logistic regression models were fitted to compare clinical characteristics between the groups. Fifteen (20%) of the 75 Nocardia isolations met the criteria for colonization. Of those, 13 (87%) had background illnesses. Having a chronic pulmonary disease was associated with increased likelihood of Nocardia colonization, in contrast to nocardiosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-15.48, p = 0.040), while an inverse association was found with corticosteroid therapy (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.74, p = 0.015). Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract accounts for a substantial proportion of all Nocardia isolations. Individuals colonized with Nocardia typically have chronic pulmonary disease and are less frequently treated with corticosteroid than patients with nocardiosis.