Extended resections for the treatment of patients with T4 stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (T4N0-1M0) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a 15-year two-center experience

Is extended resection for locally advanced thoracic cancer with cardiopulmonary bypass justified?

BACKGROUND

Resection of intrathoracic tumor with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains a relatively under-reported intervention in literature, and its role in managing locally advanced mediastinal and lung cancers is a topic of ongoing debate. Our aim was to review our experience and assess the role of CPB for treating locally advanced mediastinal and lung cancers.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, this study initially included 10 patients with primary locally advanced thoracic malignancies with apparent adjacent cardiovascular invasion demonstrated by thoracic imaging scans. Operation was performed based on a multidisciplinary tumor board consensus. Eventually, 8 patients (3 primary lung cancers and 5 mediastinal cancers) received either salvage or elective resection with CPB; two completed surgery without requiring CPB.

RESULTS

Regarding the extent of adjacent structure involvement, 4 patients presented with involvement of the superior vena cava (SVC), 1 involved the right atrium (RA), 2 involved the SVC and RA, and 1 involved the SVC, the origin of main pulmonary artery, and the ascending aorta. Thirty-day mortality occurred in two of three patients receiving salvage surgery due to respiratory insufficiency. With the long-term follow-up, one patient died of recurrence 25 months postoperatively, one survived with recurrence 30 months postoperatively, and four were alive without recurrence for 35, 36, 49, and 107 months after operations.

CONCLUSION

In certain patients, particularly for elective surgical candidates rather than salvage resection, CPB allows for extended resection of locally advanced thoracic cancers with acceptable perioperative safety and survival.

Extended Pulmonary Resection for T4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

T4 non-small cell lung cancer is a locally advanced disease with poor prognosis. The operation can be challenging even for an experienced surgeon. N2 disease has been shown repeatedly as a risk factor for poor outcome, and these patients should not be candidates for surgical treatment. Surgery for locally advanced T4 tumors without mediastinal lymph node involvement (T4N0 and T4N1) has been demonstrated to result in good outcomes in carefully selected patients. Patients with T4N0-1M0 should be rejected for surgery only after consulting an expert surgical center. As with other stages, the decision for resectability and surgery should be made by a multidisciplinary team.

Surgical results of non-small cell lung cancer involving the heart and great vessels

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) invading mediastinal organs and great vessels is still controversial. The aim of this multicentre study is to analyse oncological outcomes, surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with NSCLC involving heart and great vessels.

METHODS

362 patients treated surgically for locally advanced T4-NCSLC between 1990 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into five subgroups: pulmonary artery(n = 129), left atrium(n = 82), superior vena cava(n = 80), aorta(n = 43), and multiple vascular structures(n = 28). Resection was complete in 327(90%) patients.

RESULTS

Overall 90-day mortality was 8.8%, influenced by poly-transfusions, pneumonectomy, bronchopleural fistula and previous cardiovascular disease (4.5HR.p = 0.03, 3.7HR p = 0.01, 14.0HR.p < 0.001 and 3.0HR p < 0.01). One-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 75%, 43%, 33%, respectively and there were significant differences among the five groups(p < 0.001). Survival was significantly affected by induction radiotherapy, nodal status, pTNM-stage and radicality (3.8HR p = 0.03, 2.6HR p = 0.001, 1.6HR p < 0.05 and 1.6HR p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery provided acceptable results in selected patients with T4-NSCLC with major vascular infiltration in expert centres. Nodal-status and radicality influenced the overall-survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to have a positive effect on long-term results, particularly in N2-patients.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and its incidence seriously affects human health. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 150 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with anlotinib and discontinued treatment after disease progression or intolerance due to adverse events. Progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients served as an endpoint. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to evaluate the short-term efficacy of anlotinib treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.

Results

The median PFS of the whole 150-patient cohort was 5.0 months in (95% CI: 4.00–5.95), 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0–6.00) in 90 patients with adenocarcinoma, and 4.5 months (95% CI: 4.00–7.00) in 60 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.676). The PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.00–8.80) and 4.5 months (95% CI: 4.00–5.60) in the first-/second-line and ≥ third-line patients, respectively (P=0.315). Following the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, the median PFS of 95 patients with a PS score 0–1 was 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.50–6.50), and the median PFS of 55 patients with a PS score ntswas 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.00–5.00) (P=0.221). For the 49 patients in the combination group the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.00–9.00), while that of the 101 patients in the anlotinib-alone group was 4.0 months in (95% CI: 2.80–5.50) (P=0.010). In a separate analysis of the combination group, the median PFS of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and immunotherapy was 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.00–9.00), 12.0 months (95% CI: 6.00–12.00), and 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.00–9.80), respectively (P=0.036).

Conclusions

Anlotinib exhibits good tolerance and performance in prolonging the PFS of patients and has considerable potential as a treatment for advanced NSCLC.