A prospective trial of intraoperative tissue oxygenation measurement and its association with anastomotic leak rate after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Evaluation of anastomotic blood supply during digestive tract reconstruction with the use of the oxygen saturation index: A pooling up analysis

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious clinical complications in digestive tract reconstruction (DTR) surgery, and it is currently hypothesized that this may be related to insufficient anastomotic blood supply. Thus, Therefore, we aimed to assess the ability of tissue oxygen saturation(StO2) as a measure to evaluate anastomotic blood supply.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library. StO2 was used as an evaluation index of anastomotic blood supply after DTR to analyze the potential association between this index and the occurrence of AL in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

A total of eleven articles involving 867 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. After pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls), low StO2 was found to be an independent risk factor for AL (P < 0.00001; 95%CI: 1.02 [0.53-1.51]). The mean StO2 in the AL group (62.3%) was significantly lower than that in the non-AL group (74.3%); AL incidence increased with the reduction of StO2 to a certain value to 201.8% and 338.1% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxygen saturation index can be utilized in DTR to accurately and quantitatively evaluate the anastomotic blood supply to reduce the probability of postoperative AL.

Smoking status predicts anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major contributor to surgery-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if positive-smoking status is associated with the incidence of this complication.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed on April 4th, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised human participants undergoing esophagectomy, age ≥ 18, n ≥ 5, and identification of smoking status. The primary outcome was incidence of anastomotic leak. Sub-group analysis by ex- or current smoking status was performed. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1 using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Publication bias was evaluated visually with funnel plots and through the Egger test.

RESULTS

A total of 220 abstracts were screened, of which 69 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, with 13 studies selected for final inclusion. This included 16,103 patients, of which 4433 were ex- or current smokers, and 9141 were never smokers. Meta-analysis revealed an increased odds of anastomotic leak in patients with a positive-smoking status (current or ex-smokers) compared to never smokers (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.76, I2 = 44%, p < 0.001. Meta-analysis of six studies comparing active smokers alone to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.59, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis of five studies comparing ex-smokers to never smokers identified a significant increased odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02-1.82, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). The odds of anastomotic leak decreased among ex-smokers compared to active smokers.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the association between positive-smoking status and the risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Results further emphasize the importance of preoperative smoking cessation to reduce post-operative morbidity.

Phase II Trial Evaluating Esophageal Anastomotic Reinforcement with a Biologic, Degradable, Extracellular Matrix after Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

A biologic, degradable extracellular matrix (ECM) has been shown to support esophageal tissue remodeling, which could reduce the risk of anastomotic leak following total gastrectomy and esophagectomy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of reinforcing the anastomosis with ECM in reducing anastomotic leak as compared to a matched cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

In this single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial, gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing total gastrectomy or esophagectomy were recruited from November 2013 through December 2018. ECM was surgically wrapped circumferentially around the anastomosis. Anastomotic leak was assessed clinically and by contrast study and defined as clinically significant if requiring invasive treatment (grade 3 or higher). Anastomotic stenosis, other adverse events, symptoms, and dysphagia score were collected by standardized forms at regular follow-up visits at approximately postoperative days (POD) 21 and 90. Patients receiving ECM were compared to a cohort matched for surgery type and age.

RESULTS

ECM placement was not feasible in 9 of 75 patients (12%), resulting in 66 patients receiving ECM. Total gastrectomy was performed in 50 patients (76%) and esophagectomy in 16 (24%). Clinically significant anastomotic leak was diagnosed in 6 of 66 patients (9.1%) (3/50 [6.0%] after gastrectomy, 3/16 [18.8%] after esophagectomy); this rate did not differ from that in the matched cohort (p = 0.57). Stenosis requiring invasive treatment occurred in 8 patients (12.5%), and 10 patients (15.6%) reported not being able to eat a normal diet at POD 90. No adverse events related to ECM were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal anastomotic reinforcement after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy with a biologic, degradable ECM was mostly feasible and safe, but was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in anastomotic leak.