Ultrasonographic index for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Revisiting the Hepatorenal Index in the Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis: How it is done and the utility

METHODS

Twenty-three peer-reviewed articles on HRI measurements published between 2018 through 2023 were reviewed, and 11 were selected based on common subjects. The search terms included "hepatorenal index," "HRI," "HRI ultrasound," "hepatorenal ultrasound index," and "HRI ultrasound measurement."Three common subject areas were identified in the literature and synthesized down to 11 articles. The common subjects identified were HRI technique, HRI limitations, and HRI diagnostic accuracy. The matrix provided a quick overview of the general information in each piece, aiding in the paper's overall organization. Thirteen articles were rejected as not relevant or out of date. The research question leading this review was, "What does the literature say about the value of HRI in determining moderate to severe hepatic steatosis?"

RESULTS

The literature revealed that HRI could be valuable in determining moderate to severe hepatic steatosis. HRI could not accurately determine normal or mild steatosis and has several limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

HRI is a more objective method for determining the degree of hepatic steatosis compared with traditional B-mode ultrasound scoring and does not require additional or specialized equipment. Many studies excluded patients with various liver diseases, which may not make HRI a practical tool for clinical usefulness. Further studies should be conducted with larger patient cohorts, a greater degree of hepatic steatosis, and determine specific standardized cutoff values.

Head-to-head comparison of three different US-based quantitative parameters for hepatic steatosis assessment: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation coefficient (AC), hepato-renal index (HRI) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis by employing histopathology as reference standard.

METHODS

Participants with suspected metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) who underwent US-based parameter examinations and liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. The distributions of US parameters across different grades of steatosis were calculated, and diagnostic performance was determined based on the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 73 participants were included, with hepatic steatosis grades S0, S1, S2, and S3 distributed as follows: 13, 20, 27, and 13 respectively. The correlation coefficients for CAP, AC, and HRI ranged from 0.67 to 0.74. AC and HRI showed a strong correlation with steatosis grade. The AUC for CAP and AC in diagnosing steatosis ≥ S1 were significantly higher at 0.99 and 0.98 compared to HRI's value. For diagnosing steatosis ≥ S2, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.85) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.94), and HRI (AUC: 0.94). Similarly for diagnosing steatosis S3, the AUC of CAP (AUC: 0.68) was lower than that of AC (AUC: 0.88), and HRI (AUC: 0.88).

CONCLUSION

The AC and HRI values increased with the progression of hepatic steatosis grade, while CAP increased from S0 to S2 but not from S2 to S3. For mild steatosis diagnosis, CAP and AC showed superior diagnostic performance compared to HRI, while AC and HRI were more advantageous in differentiating moderate and severe steatosis.

Circulating hormones in biopsy-proven steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The role of metabolic/inflammatory hormonal systems in metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remains to be fully elucidated.

PURPOSE

To report the levels of the novel total and H-specific growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and other established hormonal systems and to describe hormonal patterns in controls and patients with MASLD and its stages.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study from two Gastroenterology-Hepatology Departments (Greece and Australia) and one Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Department (Italy). Overall, n = 455 serum samples of patients with biopsy-proven MASLD (n = 374) and Controls (n = 81) were recruited.

RESULTS

We report for the first time that total and H-specific GDF-15 levels are higher in MASLD, at-risk metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and severe fibrosis than in Controls. In addition, follistatin-like-3 (FSTL-3), free insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), leptin, and insulin levels were higher in MASLD patients than in Controls, while adiponectin levels were lower in MASLD subjects than in Controls. Activin-A, follistatin (FST), FSTL-3, and insulin levels significantly increased in severe fibrosis compared to no/mild fibrosis, while free IGF-1 decreased. In addition, adiponectin levels were lower in subjects without fibrosis vs. any fibrosis. Moreover, GDF-15 presented a strong positive association for the likelihood of having MASLD and at-risk MASH, while in adjusted analyses, FST and adiponectin showed inverse associations. Two different patterns of at-risk MASH were revealed through unsupervised analysis (total variation explained=54%). The most frequent pattern met in our sample (34.3%) was characterized by higher levels of total and H-specific GDF-15, follistatins, and activins, as well as low adiponectin levels. The second pattern revealed was characterized by high levels of free IGF-1, insulin, and leptin, with low levels of activin-A and adiponectin. Similar patterns were also generated in the case of overall MASLD.

CONCLUSIONS

Total and H-specific GDF-15 levels increase as MASLD severity progresses. FSTL-3, free IGF-1, leptin, and insulin are also higher, whereas adiponectin and activin-A levels are lower in the MASLD group than in Controls. Hormonal systems, including GDF-15, may not only be involved in the pathophysiology but could also prove useful for the diagnostic workup of MASLD and its stages and may potentially be of therapeutic value.

Liver biopsy-based validation, confirmation and comparison of the diagnostic performance of established and novel non-invasive steatotic liver disease indexes: Results from a large multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive tools (NIT) for metabolic-dysfunction associated liver disease (MASLD) screening or diagnosis need to be thoroughly validated using liver biopsies.

PURPOSE

To externally validate NITs designed to differentiate the presence or absence of liver steatosis as well as more advanced disease stages, to confirm fully validated indexes (n = 7 NITs), to fully validate partially validated indexes (n = 5 NITs), and to validate for the first time one new index (n = 1 NIT).

METHODS

This is a multi-center study from two Gastroenterology-Hepatology Departments (Greece and Australia) and one Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Department (Italy). Overall, n = 455 serum samples of patients with biopsy-proven MASLD (n = 374, including 237 patients with metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH)) and Controls (n = 81) were recruited. A complete validation analysis was performed to differentiate the presence of MASLD vs. Controls, MASH vs. metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver (MASL), histological features of MASH, and fibrosis stages.

RESULTS

The index of NASH (ION) demonstrated the highest differentiation ability for the presence of MASLD vs. Controls, with the area under the curve (AUC) being 0.894. For specific histological characterization of MASH, no NIT demonstrated adequate performance, while in the case of specific features of MASH, such as hepatocellular ballooning and lobular inflammation, ION demonstrated the best performance with AUC being close to or above 0.850. For fibrosis (F) classification, the highest AUC was reached by the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) being ~0.850 yet only with the potential to differentiate the severe fibrosis stages (F3, F4) vs. mild or moderate fibrosis (F0-2) with an AUC > 0.900 in patients without T2DM. When we excluded patients with morbid obesity, the differentiation ability of APRI was improved, reaching AUC = 0.802 for differentiating the presence of fibrosis F2-4 vs. F0-1. The recommended by current guidelines index FIB-4 seemed to differentiate adequately between severe (i.e., F3-4) and mild or moderate fibrosis (F0-2) with an AUC = 0.820, yet this was not the case when FIB-4 was used to classify patients with fibrosis F2-4 vs. F0-1. Trying to improve the predictive value of all NITs, using Youden's methodology, to optimize the suggested cut-off points did not materially improve the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The validation of currently available NITs using biopsy-proven samples provides new evidence for their ability to differentiate between specific disease stages, histological features, and, most importantly, fibrosis grading. The overall performance of the examined NITs needs to be further improved for applications in the clinic.

The first external validation of the Dallas steatosis index in biopsy-proven Non-alcoholic fatty liver Disease: A multicenter study

AIMS

A new non-invasive tool (NIT) for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) proposed in 2022 by the multi-ethnic Dallas Heart Study, i.e. the Dallas Steatosis Index (DSI), was validated herein using for the first time the gold standard i.e. liver biopsy-proven NAFLD.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study based on samples and data from two Gastroenterology-Hepatology Clinics (Greece and Australia) and one Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Clinic (Italy). Overall, n = 455 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 374) and biopsy-proven controls (n = 81) were recruited.

RESULTS

The ability of DSI to correctly classify participants as NAFLD or controls was very good, reaching an Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.887. The cut-off point that could best differentiate the presence vs. absence of NAFLD corresponded to DSI = 0.0 (risk threshold: 50% | Sensitivity: 0.88; Positive Predictive Value (PPV): 93.0%; F1-score = 0.91). DSI demonstrated significantly better performance characteristics than other liver steatosis indexes. Decision curve analysis revealed that the benefit of DSI as a marker to indicate the need for invasive liver assessment was confirmed only when higher DSI values, i.e. ≥ 1.4, were used as risk thresholds. DSI performance to differentiate disease progression was inadequate (all AUCs < 0.700).

CONCLUSIONS

DSI is more useful for disease screening (NAFLD vs. controls) than to differentiate diseases stages or progression. The value of any inclusion of DSI to guidelines needs to be further studied.

A bioinformatics analysis of potential cellular communication networks in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and colorectal adenoma using scRNA-seq and bulk-seq

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the global most common chronic liver disease. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), an inflammatory subtype of NAFLD, has been shown to significantly increase the risk of colorectal adenoma (CRA). Therefore, from the perspective of bioinformatics analysis, the potential mechanisms of NASH/NAFLD-CRA can be explored.

Methods

In this study, we screened the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and core effect pathways between NASH and CRA by analyzing the single-cell data of CRA patients and the high-throughput sequencing data (GSE37364 and GSE89632) in the online database. We screened therapeutic targets and biomarkers through gene function classification, pathway enrichment analysis, and protein-protein interaction network analysis. In terms of single cell data, we screened the core effect pathway and specific signal pathway of cell communication through cell annotation and cell communication analyses. The purpose of the study was to find potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and related effect pathways of NASH-CRA.

Results

NASH-CRA comorbidities were concentrated in inflammatory regulation-related pathways, and the core genes of disease progression included IL1B, FOSL1, EGR1, MYC, PTGS2, and FOS. The results suggested the key pathway of NASH-CRA might be the WNT pathway. The main cell signal communication pathways included WNT2B - (FZD6 + LRP5) and WNT2B - (FZD6 + LRP6). The send-receive process occurred in embryonic stem cells.

Conclusions

The core genes of NASH-CRA (FOS, EGR1, MYC, PTGS2, FOSL1, and IL1B) may participate in inflammation and immune responses through up-regulation in the process of disease occurrence, interfering with the pathophysiological process of CRA and NASH. NASH-CRA produces cell signal communication in the WNT pathway sent by WNT2B and received by FZD6, LRP5, and LRP6 in embryonic stem cells. These findings may help formulate early diagnosis and treatment strategies for CRA in NAFLD/NASH patients, and further explore corresponding prognostic markers and potential approaches. The significance of scRNA-seq in exploring tumor heterogeneity lies in promoting our understanding of the expression program of tumor related genes in tumor development patterns. However, the biggest challenge is that this analysis may miss out on some biologically significant gene expression programs.