Zero ischemia laparoscopic microwave ablation assisted enucleation vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumor: a randomized clinical trial

Retroperitoneoscopic Clampless, Sutureless Hybrid Therapy in the Management of Renal Hilar Tumors

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the outcomes and feasibility of a retroperitoneoscopic clampless, sutureless hybrid technique in the management of renal hilar tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with renal hilar tumors who received retroperitoneoscopic clampless, sutureless hybrid therapy between January 2017 and April 2021 was included. The hybrid surgical technique involved microwave ablation (MWA), followed by clampless tumor enucleation and sutureless hemostasis. Surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in this study. The median tumor size was 3.5 cm (2-5), the median RENAL score was 7 (range 6-10), the median operative time was 110 min (70-130), and the median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (30-130). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-4), and no warm ischemia time was observed, except in one patient who required conversion to conventional on-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with a 10 min warm ischemia time. Three minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I) and one major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III) were recorded postoperatively. Thus far, no blood transfusions have been required. Renal dysfunction or tumor recurrence did not occur within a median follow-up of 45 months.

CONCLUSION

The retroperitoneoscopic hybrid technique involving MWA, clampless tumor enucleation, and sutureless hemostasis is a feasible and safe option for the management of selective renal hilar tumors. Complete tumor removal with maximal renal function preservation can be achieved, with a low complication rate.

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted partial nephrectomy: a new avenue for the treatment of cystic renal tumors

PURPOSE

Clinically, the management of cystic renal masses is tricky. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted partial nephrectomy (LMAPN) for cystic renal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 2017 and January 2022, LMAPN was performed on 43 patients (29 men and 14 women; age range: 22-80 years; median age 54 years) with Bosniak category III (n = 15) or IV (n = 28) cystic renal tumors (size range: 1.2-5.0 cm; mean size 2.8 cm). The median follow-up period was 26 months (range: 7-56 months). Baseline and perioperative data, pathological features, renal function, postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-three cystic renal tumors were successfully managed by LMAPN. The mean operating time was 79 min (range: 40-130 min). The mean time of renal pedicle clamping was 19 min (range: 12-25 min). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 28.4 mL (range: 10-80 mL). The mean postoperative hospitalization duration was 4 days (range: 2-6 days). Negative surgical margins were diagnosed in all cases. During the follow-up, no patient appeared with distant metastasis, wound or peritoneal cavity implantation. No major but minor complications of Clavien-Dindo grade I were encountered after the operation. The 1-, 3- and 4-year overall survival rate was 100%, 96.6% and 88.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study focusing on LMAPN for cystic renal tumors, demonstrating its favorable feasibility, safety and disease control. Long-term follow-up is necessary to draw conclusions on the preference and advantages of the new therapeutic approach.

Surgical margins after partial nephrectomy as prognostic factor for the risk of local recurrence in pT1 RCC: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Purpose

To systematically review the published literature on surgical margins as a risk factor for local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) for pT1 renal cell carcinomas (RCC).

Evidence acquisition

A systematic literature search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the PRISMA criteria up to February 2022. The hypothesis was developed using the PPO method (Patients = patients with pT1 RCC undergoing PN, Prognostic factor = positive surgical margins (PSM) detected on final pathology versus negative surgical margins (NSM) and Outcome = LR diagnosed on follow-up imaging). The primary outcome was the rate of PSM and LR. The risk of bias was assessed by the QUIPS tool.

Evidence synthesis

After assessing 1525 abstracts and 409 full-text articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of PSM ranged between 0 and 34.3%. In these patients with PSM, LR varied between 0 and 9.1%, whereas only 0–1.5% of LR were found in the NSM-group. The calculated odds ratio (95% confident intervals) varied between 0.04 [0.00–0.79] and 0.27 [0.01–4.76] and was statistically significant in two studies (0.14 [0.02–0.80] and 0.04 [0.00–0.79]). The quality analysis of the included studies resulted in an overall intermediate to high risk of bias and the level of evidence was overall very low. A meta-analysis was considered unsuitable due to the high heterogeneity between the included studies.

Conclusion

PSM after PN in patients with pT1 RCC is associated with a higher risk of LR. However, the evidence has significant limitations and caution should be taken with the interpretation of this data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04016-0.

Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tumor enucleation (TE) compared with partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1 renal cell carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

According to protocol, we searched multiple data sources for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) in any language. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and rated the certainty of the evidence (CoE) using the GRADE framework.

Results

We are uncertain about the effects of TE on perioperative (mean difference [MD] 3.38, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.23; I²=68%; 4 NRSs; 942 participants; very low CoE) and long-term (MD 2.31, 95% CI -1.40 to 6.01; I²=57%; 4 NRSs; 542 participants; very low CoE) residual renal function. TE may result in little to no difference in short-term residual renal function (MD 1.04, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.83; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 256 participants; low CoE). We are uncertain about the effects of TE on cancer-specific mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.90, 95% CI: 0.11 to 7.28; I²=0%; 2 NRSs; 551 participants; very low CoE) and major adverse events (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.79; I²=0%; 10 NRS; 2,360 participants; very low CoE).

Conclusions

While TE appears to have similar effects on short term postoperative residual renal function, there were uncertainties on mortality and major adverse events. However, we need rigorous RCTs to elucidate the effects of TE as the evidence stems mostly from NRSs.

Thermal ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal tumors

OBJECTIVE

To report our preliminary results of thermal ablation, including microwave and radiofrequency ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for cT1b renal tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 56 patients with cT1b renal tumors who underwent microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between January 2014 and May 2018 were enrolled. Thirty of them underwent microwave ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (MWA-LPN group), and the other 26 received radiofrequency ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RFA-LPN group). Baseline, perioperative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences with respect to patients' gender, age, tumor size, RENAL score, BMI and estimated glomerular filtration rate between the MWA-LPN and RFA-LPN group, nor were any differences observed in warm ischemia time, post-operative complications and hospital stay. Patients in the MWA-LPN group had shorter median operative time (p = .012), less estimated blood loss (p = .023). Median follow-up was 36 months (range 12-64). Three-year cancer-specific and progression-free survival was 100% and 96.4%. The overall kidney recurrence rate was 3.6% in the present study.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a safe, effective nephron-sparing treatment which provides acceptable results for selective cT1b renal tumors.