Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management

Fifth Metatarsal Fractures

Fifth metatarsal features are the most common fractures in the foot. They have a long history that has resulted in many classification systems and little consensus on appropriate treatment. Although there is some agreement among experts, there are also many questions yet to be answered. There is a general consensus that dancer's fractures and zone 1 fractures can generally be treated nonoperatively. There is much more debate about zone 2 and 3 fractures and appropriate treatment guidelines. The authors review the current literature and give the recommendation for treatment based on their experience in a community-based private practice.

Awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures among soccer coaches in Japan: A cross-sectional study

Although a fifth metatarsal stress fracture is the most frequent stress fracture in soccer players, awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures among soccer coaches is unclear. Therefore, we performed an online survey of soccer coaches affiliated with the Japan Football Association to assess their awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures. A total of 150 soccer coaches were invited for an original online survey. Data on participants' age, sex, types of coaching licence, coaching category, types of training surface, awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures, and measures employed to prevent fifth metatarsal stress fractures were collected using the survey. Data from 117 coaches were analysed. Eighty-seven of the 117 coaches were aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures; however, only 30% reported awareness of preventive and treatment measures for fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Licensed coaches (i.e., licensed higher than level C) were also more likely to be aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures than unlicensed coaches were. Furthermore, although playing on artificial turf is an established risk factor for numerous sports injuries, soccer coaches who usually trained on artificial turf were more likely to be unaware of the risks associated with fifth metatarsal stress fractures than coaches who trained on other surfaces were (e.g., clay fields). Soccer coaches in the study population were generally aware of fifth metatarsal stress fractures; however, most were unaware of specific treatment or preventive training strategies for fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Additionally, coaches who practised on artificial turf were not well educated on fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Our findings suggest the need for increased awareness of fifth metatarsal stress fractures and improved education of soccer coaches regarding injury prevention strategies.　.

Can the Entire Function of the Foot Be Concentrated in the Forefoot Area during the Running Stance Phase? A Finite Element Study of Different Shoe Soles

The goal of this study was to use the finite element (FE) method to compare and study the differences between bionic shoes (BS) and normal shoes (NS) forefoot strike patterns when running. In addition, we separated the forefoot area when forefoot running as a way to create a small and independent area of instability. An adult male of Chinese descent was recruited for this investigation (age: 26 years old; body height: 185 cm; body mass: 82 kg) (forefoot strike patterns). We analyzed forefoot running under two different conditions through FE analysis, and used bone stress distribution feature classification and recognition for further analysis. The metatarsal stress values in forefoot strike patterns with BS were less than with NS. Additionally, the bone stress classification of features and the recognition accuracy rate of metatarsal (MT) 2, MT3 and MT5 were higher than other foot bones in the first 5%, 10%, 20% and 50% of nodes. BS forefoot running helped reduce the probability of occurrence of metatarsal stress fractures. In addition, the findings further revealed that BS may have important implications for the prevention of hallux valgus, which may be more effective in adolescent children. Finally, this study presents a post-processing method for FE results, which is of great significance for further understanding and exploration of FE results.

Osseous Stress Injuries: Treatment Algorithms and Return to Play

Osseous stress injuries are common in athletes. Specifically, lower extremity injuries are prevalent in running athletes and upper extremity injuries are prevalent in throwing athletes. Such injuries are suspected when there is focal bone tenderness and increased pain with the inciting activity. In elite athletes, osseous stress injuries are a relatively common culprit in lost play time. Thus rapid diagnosis and treatment is imperative to expedite return to play (RTP). The radiologist's role in these cases is not only for diagnosis, but also to grade the injury, which has implications in determining a treatment regimen. The high sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging is thus the preferred imaging modality. This article discusses common osseous stress injuries, the imaging findings, and how different treatment regimens affect RTP.

Is Surgical Treatment Necessary for the Treatment of a Jones Fracture?: A Retrospective Study

Background

Jones fractures are common injuries that can be treated conservatively or surgically. However, the optimal treatment approach remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of conservative and operative treatments for Jones fractures and determine whether surgical treatment is necessary.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 69 patients with Jones fractures treated at our hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: conservative (C group; n = 46) and operative (O group; n = 23) treatments. Patients were followed up after 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter. However, outpatient follow-ups were conducted between 8 and 10 weeks as needed. The mean follow-up period was 14.5 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). In group C, the patients were treated with a non-weight-bearing cast for 4-6 weeks, followed by additional weight-bearing boot immobilization before returning to exercise. In group O, patients were treated surgically using a bicortical screw or intramedullary internal fixation. Time to radiologic union, clinical union, return to sports, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index-Revised Short Form (FFI-RS), and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were evaluated.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the time to radiologic union and return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. In group C, favorable outcomes were observed in terms of the time to return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. Contrastingly, in group O, better results were observed in time to radiologic union. The AOFAS score was excellent at the final follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Complication rates were 10.8% and 13% in groups C and O, respectively.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment is sometimes necessary for Jones fractures, but conservative treatment should also be considered because of the favorable outcomes. Conservative treatment can be a good option for patients who are risk-averse and place a high value on fracture healing without surgery.

Compression screw internal fixation versus non-weight-bearing cast immobilization for Jones fractures in children

BACKGROUND

Several methods have been used to treat pediatric Jones fractures, but there has been no consensus about the optimum method. The purposes of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between compression screw and non-weight-bearing techniques used in pediatric Jones fractures and clarify the most suitable treatment option for this population.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients who presented with Jones fractures between January 2015 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into the compression screw group (n=10) and cast immobilization (n=11) group. The following parameters were compared between them: demographic data; times to radiographic union, full weight bearing, and return to daily life; and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot scores at 3 months postoperatively and the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, laterality, and preoperative displacement. The mean immobilization time and times to radiographic union, full weight bearing, and return to daily life were significantly shorter in the compression screw group than in the cast immobilization group. The AOFAS scores at the final follow-up did not differ significantly between the two groups. One case of refracture and delayed union each were observed in the non-weight-bearing cast group. However, no patients experienced nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Compression screw and non-weight-bearing cast techniques are effective methods for treating pediatric Jones fractures. The complication rate was lower in pediatrics than in adults. However, compared with the non-weight-bearing cast technique, the compression screw technique has the advantages of a shorter radiographic union time, shorter immobilization times, and earlier return to full weight bearing and daily life. We recommend compression screw fixation for widely displaced fractures and school-age and active adolescents to avoid delays in healing, nonunion, disruption to daily living, and time off school.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Jones Fracture in the National Football League

Background: Jones fracture, or proximal fifth metatarsal fracture, is a common injury in National Football League (NFL)-caliber athletes. Combine draft performance can greatly impact the long-term success of these athletes, and substantial emphasis has been placed on early return to play (RTP) and the minimization of post-operative complications after Jones fracture in these athletes. To date, no study has specifically described the treatment and outcomes of this injury specifically in NFL-caliber players, considering factors relevant to this unique population. Thus, the purpose of this review is to delve into Jones fracture in NFL-caliber athletes, evaluating the diagnostic, treatment, and RTP considerations. Methods: We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) for the concept of Jones fractures in the NFL. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a team of three reviewers conducted abstract screenings, full-text screenings, and the extraction of studies describing Jones fractures specifically in the NFL. Results: Of the 1911 studies identified, 6 primary retrospective studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The heterogeneity of the outcome reporting precluded a meta-analysis; thus, a qualitative review of manuscripts describing Jones fracture was carried out. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment considerations, RTP statistics and outcomes, and complications were discussed. Amongst the primary studies, there were 285 Jones fractures, all athletes were able to RTP, and the average time to RTP ranged from 6 weeks to 27 weeks. For complications, with operative treatment, the refracture rate ranged from 4 to 12%, and incomplete healing ranged from 7 to 50%. RTP was 15 weeks for refractures. There were no patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The vast majority of Zone 2/3 Jones fractures are treated with IM screw fixation with or without adjunctive orthobiologics, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate, in NFL-caliber athletes. The six major series investigating outcomes after the operative treatment of Jones fractures in NFL players reveal very positive findings overall with regard to RTP, reoperation, and career continuation.

Shockwave Treatment vs Surgery for Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fractures in Soccer Players: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical, radiologic, and functional outcomes between shockwave and operative treatments for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures in soccer players in a pilot study.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, 18 soccer players with fifth metatarsal stress fractures attended at Mutualidad de Futbolistas Españoles-Delegación Catalana were included. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups receiving either surgery with an intramedullary screw (group 1) or high-energy focused extracorporeal shockwave treatment (group 2 performed once a week for 3 weeks using 2000 impulses at an energy flux density of 0.21 mJ/mm2 and 4 Hz frequency). Clinical (pain), radiologic (bone healing), and functional (Tegner Activity Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society [AOFAS] ankle-hindfoot scales) outcomes before and after receiving the treatment were compared between both groups. In addition, ability and time to return to play was also compared between groups.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences at last follow-up between surgery and extracorporeal shockwave treatment for bone healing, pain relief, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, Tegner score, and time return to play. No complications were reported in either of the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, extracorporeal shockwave treatment and operative treatment were found to be equally effective at reducing pain, achieving bone healing, and allowing the soccer players to return to play after proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. This study suggests that ESWT may be a good option for the management of proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures in soccer players. If this approach proves successful in larger trials, the shockwave approach might help avoid known complications of the surgical treatment like wound problems, nerve injury, and hardware intolerance. Further investigations with larger sample size should be conducted in order to confirm the present conclusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic, pilot randomized controlled trial.

Republication of "Stress Fractures of the Foot and Ankle in Athletes"

Stress fractures of the foot and ankle are common injuries in athletes. Management differs considerably based on fracture location and predisposing factors. Repetitive loading of the foot and ankle in athletes should result in physiologic bone remodeling in accordance with Wolff's law. However, when there is not sufficient time for complete healing to occur before additional loads are incurred, this process can instead lead to stress fracture. Assessment of the athlete's training regimen and overall bone health is paramount to both the discovery and treatment of these injuries, although diagnosis is often delayed in the setting of normal-appearing initial radiographs. While most stress fractures of the foot or ankle can usually be treated nonoperatively with a period of activity modification, fractures in certain locations are considered "high risk" due to poor intrinsic healing and may warrant more proactive operative management.

Dance-Related Foot and Ankle Injuries and Pathologies

Dancers are highly vulnerable to injuries due to high dynamic overload, extreme positions and motions, and excessive use. Increased load at the forefoot with jumping and high-impact lands can cause sesamoiditis and stress fractures of the metatarsals. Significant plantarflexion can lead to posterior joint impingement and flexor hallucis longus tendonitis, whereas forced dorsiflexion can cause anterior joint impingement. Most pathologies can be diagnosed on physical examination and various imaging modalities. Treatment should be tailored to the dancers' needs and should begin with a course of conservative therapy with immobilization, physical therapy, and activity cessation.

What Is the Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Lawrence and Botte Classification System of Fifth Metatarsal Base Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are common, and often they are classified using a three-part scale first proposed by Lawrence and Botte. A clear consensus on prognosis and treatment for these fractures is lacking, particularly for fractures in the middle classification, Zone 2; the reliability of the classification scheme itself may be partly at fault for this. The intra- and interrater reliability of the classification itself has never been established, and it remains unclear whether the three-part classification of fifth metatarsal fractures can be applied consistently enough to guide treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

When used by experienced orthopaedic surgeons, (1) What is the overall interrater reliability of the three-part Lawrence and Botte classification of fifth metatarsal base fractures? (2) What is the overall intrarater reliability of the three-part Lawrence and Botte classification of fifth metatarsal base fractures? (3) What are these same metrics for the individual transitions within the classification (Zone 1-2 and Zone 2-3)?

METHODS

Thirty sets of initial presentation radiographs representing an equal number of fractures originally diagnosed by treating clinicians as Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 were evaluated and classified by three orthopaedic surgeons specializing in foot and ankle surgery and eight foot and ankle fellows to determine interrater reliability. Two weeks later, the same set of radiographs were reevaluated in random order to determine intrarater reliability. Kappa values for interrater and intrarater reliability were calculated. Additionally, the individual transitions between zones were separately analyzed by calculating kappa values for a hypothetical two-part classification based on each transition.

RESULTS

The three-part Lawrence and Botte classification of fifth metatarsal fractures demonstrated an overall interrater agreement of κ = 0.66 (observed agreement 77% versus chance agreement 33%). Intrarater reliability for the 11 surgeons ranged from κ = 0.60 to κ = 0.90. A two-part scheme divided by the transition between Zone 1 and Zone 2 demonstrated an interrater agreement of κ = 0.83, and a two-part scheme divided by the transition between Zone 2 and Zone 3 demonstrated a much lower interrater reliability of κ = 0.66.

CONCLUSION

The three-part Lawrence and Botte classification system demonstrated a concerningly low level of interrater reliability with an observed agreement of 77% compared with a chance agreement of 33%. The primary source of concern is the assessment of the interface between Zone 2 and Zone 3, which proved much less reliable than that between Zone 1 and Zone 2. This suggests that previous studies of isolated Zone 1 fractures likely contain a homogeneous fracture cohort, whereas studies of Zone 2 or Zone 3 fractures are likely to include a mixture of fracture types. In practice, the consensus treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures differs based on whether they represent a more proximal, avulsive injury or a more distal injury from indirect trauma. Our data suggest that the Lawrence and Botte classification should be abandoned. Further work should focus on developing a new classification scheme that demonstrates improved interobserver reliability and more directly corresponds to this treatment paradigm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Less Invasive Surgery With Autologous Bone Grafting for Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Diaphyseal Stress Fractures

Surgery with autologous bone grafting for proximal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal stress fracture has a potential to decrease nonunion, but it is not performed widely as the primary surgery because of donor-site morbidity. We have devised and performed a less invasive surgical procedure with autologous bone grafting and aimed to investigate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of this procedure. The data for 73 patients who underwent primary intramedullary screw fixation with autologous bone grafting from the fifth metatarsal base for proximal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal stress fractures were investigated retrospectively. The clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated. The mean time to bone union, starting running, and return to play was 11.8, 6.3, and 13.4 weeks, respectively. Bone union was achieved in 76 of the 78 cases. Intramedullary screw fixation with autologous bone grafting from the fifth metatarsal base showed good outcomes. It may be a useful surgical option for patients with proximal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal stress fractures.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Retrospective Study of 834 Fractures With a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years

BACKGROUND

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common fractures. Treatment strategies have been debated. We wanted to investigate whether Lawrence and Botte's classification has prognostic value because of time to fracture union, and evaluate if weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) and nonweightbearing (NWB) treatment strategy had effect on time to fracture union in nonoperatively treated fractures.

METHODS

Computerized database search, patients diagnosed between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

We identified 834 fractures; 510 (61.2%) zone 1, 157 (18.8%) zone 2, and 167 (20.0%) zone 3. Most (94.4%) were treated nonoperatively; time to fracture union was 7.5 (SD 7.7), 7.7 (5.6), and 9.2 (8.1) weeks for zone 1, 2, and 3, respectively, which gave a significant longer time to union for zone 3 compared to zone 1 fractures (P = .04). There was no difference in time to fracture union when comparing WBAT and NWB for all fracture zones. Failure to union, defined as crossover to surgery and/or delayed union, was found in 13 (2.7%) zone 1, 5 (3.2%) zone 2, and 6 (3.8%) zone 3 fractures. Refracture during follow-up was found in 3 (0.6%) zone 1 and 14 (8.9%) zone 3 fractures.

CONCLUSION

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures have high union rates with nonoperative treatment. No difference in time to union could be found between WBAT and NWB treatment strategies for all fracture zones. We observed a significantly longer time to fracture union for zone 3 fractures compared to zone 1 fractures. Refracture occurs in a nonnegligible share of nonoperatively treated zone 3 fractures.

Return to Play and Player Performance After Foot Fracture in UEFA Soccer Players

Background:

There is a paucity of information on rate and time to return to play (RTP) in elite-level soccer players who have sustained foot fractures.

Purpose:

To (1) determine the rate and timing of RTP after foot fracture (eg, tarsal, metatarsal, or phalangeal), (2) investigate foot fracture reinjury incidence after RTP, and (3) evaluate performance after foot fracture as compared with matched, uninjured controls.

Study Design:

Descriptive epidemiology study.

Methods:

Athletes sustaining foot fractures were identified across the 5 major European soccer leagues (English Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1, and Serie A) between 2000 and 2016. Injured athletes were matched to controls (1:1) using demographic characteristics and performance metrics from 1 season before injury. The authors recorded RTP rate, reinjury incidence, player characteristics associated with RTP within 2 seasons of injury, player availability, field time, and performance metrics during the 4 seasons after injury.

Results:

A total of 192 elite soccer players sustaining a foot fracture were identified; 40 players (20.8%) underwent operative treatment. Athletes missed an average of 69.41 ± 59.43 days and 5.15 ± 23.28 games. In the 4 seasons after injury, 80% of players returned to play, with 72% returning to play within 1 season of injury. Nine players (5%) sustained a subsequent foot fracture. Athletes with a foot fracture demonstrated significantly longer league retention compared with uninjured controls (P < .001). Elite soccer players older than 30 years of age were less likely to RTP (odds ratio, 0.67; P = .002), whereas career experience, field position, and baseline performance showed no significant association with RTP rates. Injured athletes demonstrated similar performance to controls during the 4 years after injury, and there were no position-dependent differences on subgroup analysis. The players who underwent operative treatment had more assists per 90 minutes and more team points per game during the first season after injury compared with athletes treated nonoperatively.

Conclusion:

Foot fractures in elite soccer players resulted in moderate loss of play time (69.41 days). RTP rates were high at 80%, although players older than 30 years of age were less likely to RTP. On RTP, athletes who sustained a foot fracture maintained performance similar to preinjury levels and to uninjured controls.

Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fractures: Diagnosis and Treatment

A Jones fracture, located at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal, is at an increased risk for nonunion and continued pain. Even with excellent surgical technique and postoperative management, a delayed union and refracture can occur. These complications in athletes can have deleterious effects on performance and delay return to sport. This article reviews the classification, diagnosis, and treatment considerations for Jones fractures. Treatment options including nonsurgical management, intramedullary screw, and plate fixation will be covered. The authors preferred technique using intramedullary screw fixation will be discussed in depth. Emerging considerations including biologic augmentation, primary bone grafting, and refracture will be examined as well. Ideal rehabilitation protocols, orthoses, and shoe wear suggestions will be given to optimize patient outcomes.

Pediatric Sports Injuries

Recreational sports are more popular, with many athletes involved year-round in multiple sports and on multiple teams. Most athletes do not take proper rest, making them more susceptible to stress-related injuries. There are numerous sports-related injuries in the foot and ankle. These issues can be non-traumatic, due to chronic repetitive stresses, or traumatic. Most of these injuries are managed conservatively, and athletes do well and return to play, while some do better with operative management. This article discusses a few of the sports injuries that are common in the leg, foot, and ankle and the recovery process.

Functional outcome of 103 fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal bone

Background

Metatarsal fractures are common skeletal injuries of the lower extremity in adults. The majority involves the proximal fifth metatarsal bone. In the current literature, there still exists controversy regarding treatment recommendations for the different fracture entities.

Methods

All patients suffering from single fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone between 2003 and 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Only patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. The fractures were classified according to Lawrence and Botte (L&B). Data were collected via patient registry, radiographs and a standardized questionnaire (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score = FOAS). For outcome analysis, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was performed and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient calculated.

Results

In total, the functional outcomes of 103 patients suffering from fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone were analyzed. L&B type I fractures (n = 13) had a FAOS score of 91 ± 23, L&B type II (n = 67) presented a score of 91 ± 15 and L&B type III (n = 23) a score of 93 ± 11. Surgically treated patients with an L&B type II fracture had no statistically significant better functional outcome in comparison to conservative management (p = 0.89). Operatively treated L&B type III fractures tended to have a better functional score (p = 0.16). The follow-up time was 58 (min: 15; max: 164) months.

Conclusions

Overall, the functional outcome following fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone is satisfactory. Conservatively treated L&B type II fractures showed an equivalent functional outcome compared to surgical management. Patients with an L&B type III fracture mainly were treated surgically, but difference in FAOS score did not reach level of significance.

The Effectiveness of Intramedullary Screw Fixation Using the Herbert Screw for Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fractures in High-Level Athletes

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary screw fixation is the most common operative procedure used for treatment of fifth metatarsal stress fractures in athletes. However, the optimal implant in intramedullary screw fixation is still being investigated.

PURPOSE

To review experiences with intramedullary screw fixation using the Herbert screw for fifth metatarsal stress fractures in high-level athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed 37 high-level athletes (Tegner activity score ≥7) who underwent intramedullary screw fixation using the Herbert screw for fifth metatarsal stress fractures between August 2005 and August 2017. The minimum follow-up period of the patients was 2 years. In assessing the surgical results, time to obtain bone union, time to return to original level of sport participation, and treatment failures/complications were reviewed. Additionally, the effect of intraoperative plantar gap widening caused by the screw insertion was analyzed. The surgical results of the 2 groups, the no-gap group (intraoperative plantar gap widening, <1 mm) and the gap group (intraoperative plantar gap widening, ≥1 mm), were compared, while correlations between intraoperative plantar gap widening and the surgical results were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Bone union and return to the original sport were attained in all patients without treatment failures/complications such as delayed union, nonunion, or refracture. The mean time to obtain bone union was 10.1 weeks, and the mean time to return to sport was 10.9 weeks. In comparing the no-gap group (n = 16) and the gap group (n = 21), no significant differences in the time to obtain bone union (P = .392) or to return to sport (P = .399) were noted. Additionally, there was no correlation between intraoperative plantar gap widening and the time to obtain bone union (r = 0.131; P = .428) or to return to sport (r = 0.160; P = .331).

CONCLUSION

The use of the Herbert screw for intramedullary screw fixation to treat fifth metatarsal stress fractures in high-level athletes provided satisfactory results enabling all the athletes to return to the original sport without treatment failures/complications. Additionally, intraoperative plantar gap widening does not affect the surgical results using this technique.

[Fixation of displaced fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures]

OBJECTIVE

Open reduction and internal fixation of grossly dislocated fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures aims at restoration of the anatomical structure of the forefoot. The goal is to restore length, axis, rotation and joint position, while observing the metatarsal index (Maestro curve).

INDICATIONS

Grossly dislocated and/or open shaft/neck fractures of the fifth metatarsal; combined fractures of the forefoot involving the fifth metatarsal.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Lack of consent to surgery. Overall critical (life-threatening) general condition preventing surgery to the extremities. Contaminated or infected soft tissues.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Depending on the planned method of fixation, open reduction is usually conducted via a lateral approach centrally above the easily palpable metatarsal V shaft. The incision lies above the glabrous skin of the sole. For markedly shortened and multifragment subcapital and shaft fractures of the fifth metatarsal, open reduction and plate fixation is the method of choice. Interlocking plates with a screw diameter of 2.0-2.4 mm are preferred to avoid later soft tissue irritation. Anatomic reconstruction is carried out under longitudinal traction at the fifth toe using small reduction clamps and, if necessary, temporary K‑wire fixation. If the fragments are large enough, one or more interfragmentary lag screws can be used for fracture compression. A straight or condylar plate is used for internal fixation. Long spiral fifth metatarsal shaft fractures may alternatively be fixed with screws. In the case of transverse or subcapital fractures, percutaneous antegrade or retrograde medullary wiring with two Kirschner wires should be considered.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Following surgical treatment, rest and elevation of the injured leg, and local cooling are indicated. Subsequently, mobilization with partial weight bearing (20 kg) in foot orthosis or cast shoe for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Even grossly displaced fractures of the fifth metatarsal shaft have a good to excellent prognosis following surgical treatment with high union rates and rare complications. Undisplaced and mildly displaced fractures can be successfully managed nonoperatively with 6 weeks of weight bearing as tolerated in a stable orthosis or cast shoes.

Fifth metatarsal fractures in skeletally immature patients do not need routine orthopedic surgeon assessment and follow-up

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of delayed or nonunion of fifth metatarsal fractures in skeletally immature patients. Using this information, we sought to develop an evidence-based clinical care pathway in order to mitigate unnecessary patient radiation exposure, costs to families, and costs to the health system.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of patients who presented to an academic tertiary-care paediatric hospital between 2009 and 2014 with isolated fifth metatarsal fractures.

Results

A total of 114 patients (61 males and 53 females) with mean age of 11.2 (SD 3.0) years old were included in the study. No patients required operative management. There was one case of delayed union and no cases of nonunion. There was no association of these complications with fracture type, location, or mechanism of injury. There was no association of complications with immobilization type or immobilization period. Despite the low complication rate and need for surgery, fracture clinic resource utilization was significant. Fractures were managed with a mean number of 3.1 (SD 0.89) clinic visits and a mean number of 2.7 (SD1.0) radiology department visits where a mean total of 7.9 (SD 3.4) x-rays were performed.

Conclusions

Based on our retrospective review, skeletally immature patients presenting with isolated fifth metatarsal fractures have a very low rate of delayed or nonunion. A selective follow-up strategy will decrease radiation exposure, reduce costs to families and the healthcare system, without compromising clinical outcomes.

Fractures of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal (PFMT) are one of the most common foot injuries, accounting for 61% to 78% of all foot fractures, but full consensus on their classification, diagnosis, and treatment has not yet been reached.

»

The most commonly accepted classification is that of Lawrence and Botte, who divided the location of PFMT fractures into 3 zones with respect to their healing potential.

»

Avulsion fractures of the tuberosity of the base (zone 1) generally heal well, and nonoperative treatment is commonly recommended.

»

Internal fixation may be considered for displaced fractures that extend into the fourth-fifth intermetatarsal joint (zone 2) as well as for nondisplaced fractures in athletes or high-demand patients, with the aims of reducing the healing time and expediting return to sport or work.

»

Stress fractures of the proximal diaphysis (zone 3) are preferably treated operatively, particularly in the presence of signs of delayed union. With nonoperative treatment, supportive measures such as ultrasonography or external/extracorporeal shockwave therapy have been demonstrated to have limited potential for the enhancement of fracture-healing.

Return to Play and Fracture Union After the Surgical Management of Jones Fractures in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are among the most common forefoot injuries in athletes. The management of this injury can be challenging because of delayed union and refractures. Intramedullary (IM) screw fixation rather than nonoperative management has been recommended in the athletic population.

PURPOSE

To provide an updated summary of the return-to-play (RTP) rate and time to RTP after Jones fractures in athletes with regard to their management, whether operative or nonoperative, and to explore the union rate and time to union as well as the rate of complications such as refractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 2 independent team members searched several databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through November 2019 to identify studies reporting on Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal exclusively in athletes. The primary outcomes were the RTP rate and time to RTP, whereas the secondary outcomes were the number of games missed, time to union, and union rate as well as the rates of nonunion, delayed union, and refractures.

RESULTS

Of 168 studies identified, 22 studies were eligible for meta-analysis with a total of 646 Jones fractures. The overall RTP rate was 98.4% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.4%) in 626 of 646 Jones fractures. The RTP rate with IM screw fixation only was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.8%-99.7%), with other surgical fixation methods (plate, Minifix) was 98.4% (95% CI, 95.8%-100.0%), and with nonoperative management was 71.6% (95% CI, 45.6%-97.6%). There were 3 studies directly comparing RTP rates with surgical versus nonoperative management, which showed significant superiority in favor of surgery (odds ratio, 0.033 [95% CI, 0.005-0.215]; P < .001). The RTP rate according to type of sport was 99.0% (95% CI, 97.5%-100.0%) in football, 91.1% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.4%) in basketball, and 96.6% (95% CI, 92.6%-100.0%) in soccer. The overall time to RTP was 9.6 weeks (95% CI, 8.5-10.7 weeks). The time to RTP in the surgical group (IM screw fixation) was 9.6 weeks (95% CI, 8.3-10.9 weeks), which was significantly less than that in the nonoperative group of 13.1 weeks (95% CI, 8.2-18.0 weeks). The pooled union rate in the operative group (excluding refractures) was 97.3% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.4%), whereas the pooled union rate in the nonoperative group was 71.4% (95% CI, 49.1%-93.7%). The overall time to union was 9.1 weeks (95% CI, 7.7-10.4 weeks). The time to union with IM screw fixation (8.2 weeks [95% CI, 7.5-9.0 weeks]) was shorter than that with nonoperative treatment (13.7 weeks [95% CI, 12.7-14.6 weeks]). The rate of delayed union was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.2%-3.7%), and the overall refracture rate was 10.2% (95% CI, 5.9%-14.5%).

CONCLUSION

The RTP rate and time to RTP after the surgical management of Jones fractures in athletes were excellent, regardless of the implant used and type of sport. IM screw fixation was superior to nonoperative management, as it led to a higher rate of RTP, shorter time to RTP, higher rate of union, shorter time to union, and improved functional outcomes. We recommend surgical fixation for all Jones fractures in athletes.

Surgical Management of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review

Background

As a result of the high physical demand in sport, elite athletes are particularly prone to fifth metatarsal fractures. These injuries are typically managed surgically to avoid high rates of delayed union and allow for quicker return to play (RTP).

Purpose

To review studies showing clinical and radiographic outcomes, RTP rates, and complication rates after different surgical treatment modalities for fifth metatarsal fractures exclusively in elite-level athletes.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted within the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to January 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical outcome studies after operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures in elite athletes. Exclusion criteria consisted of nonoperative management, high school or recreational-level athletic participation, nonclinical studies, expert opinions, and case series with <5 patients.

Results

A total of 12 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, comprising 280 fifth metatarsal fractures treated surgically. Intramedullary screw fixation was the most common fixation construct (47.9%), and some form of intraoperative adjunctive treatment (calcaneal autograft, iliac crest bone graft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, demineralized bone matrix) was used in 67% of cases. Radiographic union was achieved in 96.7% of fractures regardless of surgical construct used. The overall mean time to union was 9.19 weeks, with RTP at a mean of 11.15 weeks. The overall reported complication rate was 22.5%, with varying severity of complications. Refracture rates were comparable between the different surgical constructs used, and the overall refracture rate was 8.6%.

Conclusion

Elite athletes appeared to have a high rate of union and reliably returned to the same level of competition after surgical management of fifth metatarsal fractures, irrespective of surgical construct used. Despite this, the overall complication rate was >20%. Specific recommendations for optimal surgical management could not be made based on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture fixation in athletes: A review and current concept

Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture is a common occurrence among athletes at all levels. These fractures may occur due to several mechanisms, but inversions and twisting injuries are considered some of the leading causes in sports. However, while Jones fracture incidences are frequent in the sporting world, there is still a lack of consensus on how such fractures should be effectively managed. There are numerous treatment options for patients with fifth metatarsal Jones fractures. The role of nonoperative treatment remains controversial, with concerns about delayed union and nonunion. Surgical stabilization of metatarsal Jones fractures is therefore often recommended for athletes, as it is often associated with a low number of complications and a higher rate of union than nonoperative management. This review will focus on literature regarding the prevalence of Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture, alongside the efficacy of both conservative and surgical treatment within this population.

Outcomes of Surgically Treated Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Major League Soccer Athletes

BACKGROUND

Sports-related fractures of the fifth metatarsal are common in professional athletes. Data regarding outcomes of surgical management including refracture, complications, and return-to-play statistics are available for other professional American sports with a notable exception of soccer.

PURPOSE

To quantify the burden of operative fifth metatarsal fractures in Major League Soccer (MLS) athletes, to compare outcomes as well as refracture and complication rates with other professional sports, to analyze factors that may contribute to treatment failure, and to report on return-to-play characteristics for affected players.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We searched all injuries in the prospectively collected HealtheAthlete database for MLS for operative fifth metatarsal fractures for seasons 2013 to 2017. Additional information regarding each fracture including demographics, treatment, postoperative course, and return-to-play statistics were compiled from HealtheAthlete and supplemented by teams' chief medical officers, coaches, trainers, and online sources.

RESULTS

There were 21 fractures in 18 players during the study period. Mean time to radiographic healing was 8.5 weeks (n = 17). Mean time to return to play was 11.1 weeks (n = 19). Of 21 fractures, 20 (95%) players returned to sport. Of 18 players, 4 (22.2%) experienced refracture. Of 18 players, 5 (27.8%) and 2 (11.1%) reported previous stress injuries on the contralateral and ipsilateral limb, respectively. Player performance characteristics showed small declines in the first year of return that improved by the second year.

CONCLUSION

MLS athletes who sustain a sports-related fifth metatarsal fracture can expect a high rate of return to sport with time to radiographic healing and return to play as well as risk of refracture similar to other professional cohorts.

Can low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerate bone healing after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures? A retrospective study

Background

Intramedullary screw fixation is considered the standard treatment for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a well-known bone-healing enhancement device. However, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical study has focused on the effect of LIPUS for postoperative bone union in proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effect of LIPUS treatment after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures.

Methods

Between January 2015 and March 2020, patients who underwent intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures were investigated retrospectively. All patients underwent intramedullary screw fixation using a headless compression screw with autologous bone grafts from the base of the fifth metatarsal. The time to restart running and return to sports, as well as that for radiographic bone union, were compared between groups with or without LIPUS treatment. LIPUS treatment was initiated within 3 weeks of surgery in all cases.

Results

Of the 101 ft analyzed, 57 ft were assigned to the LIPUS treatment group, and 44 ft were assigned to the non-LIPUS treatment group. The mean time to restart running and return to sports was 6.8 and 13.7 weeks in the LIPUS treatment group and was 6.2 and 13.2 weeks in the non-LIPUS treatment group, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between groups. In addition, the mean time to radiographic bone union was not significantly different between the LIPUS treatment group (11.9 weeks) and the non-LIPUS treatment group (12.0 weeks). The rate of postoperative nonunion in the LIPUS treatment group was 0% (0/57), while that in the non-LIPUS treatment group was 4.5% (2/44). However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

There were no statistically significant differences regarding the time to start running, return to sports, and radiographic bone union in patients with or without LIPUS treatment after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Therefore, we cannot recommend the routine use of LIPUS to shorten the time to bone union after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures.

[Stress fractures of the lower limbs]

Stress reactions and fractures represent an important differential diagnostic entity, especially in patients active in sports. The lower extremities have predilection sites for stress fractures, which require special treatment in the context of the underlying risk factors. Clinically, patients usually complain of stress-dependent pain in the affected region and sport activities are mostly limited or even impossible. The detection of acute stress fractures is usually missed by conventional X‑ray within the first 4-6 weeks. The gold standard diagnostic tool is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Depending on the location, a distinction must be made between low-risk and high-risk stress fractures. Low-risk fractures show a high healing rate after conservative treatment including load and stress reduction as well as avoiding risk factors. High-risk fractures can take a complicated course under conservative treatment measures and in some cases, surgical intervention is required.

Percutaneous Fixation of a Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture

Owing to a vascular watershed, zone II and III fifth metatarsal base fractures commonly progress to nonunion without operative intervention. This article and the accompanying video demonstrate the use of intramedullary screw fixation for a fifth metatarsal base fracture and review treatment decisions involved with management of these injuries.

Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Fifth Metatarsal Avulsion Fractures

Fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures are among the most common fractures seen by foot and ankle surgeons. Studies have centered around classification systems, but debate continues regarding surgical versus conservative treatment modalities. The present study focused on quantifying the time for healing fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. Specifically, we compared healing time, displacement, and incidence of nonunion among surgically managed and conservatively managed avulsion fractures. Surgically managed patients underwent either open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction with percutaneous fixation. Conservatively managed fractures were immobilized with a below-knee cast or pneumatic walking boot. Fifty-one patient records (51 feet) were retrospectively compared for basic demographics, smoking, and diabetes status, presence of peripheral neuropathy, Stewart classification, amount of displacement, rate of nonunion, and radiographic healing time. The groups did not differ significantly based on age, sex, or the remaining clinical characteristics including time to consolidation. However, among the 31 conservatively managed patients, 11 (35.5%) developed an asymptomatic nonunion versus none among the 20 patients treated surgically (p = .004). All patients were asymptomatic at 1 year. This study provides insight into the time required for fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures to heal or become asymptomatic. The surgical management of these fractures helped to eliminate the risk of nonunion and helped ensure a timely return to preinjury activity. We recommend surgical management of any fifth metatarsal avulsion fracture displaced >2 mm. Both patients and physicians should have realistic expectations when making decisions regarding treatment modalities for fifth metatarsal avulsion fractures.

The Use of Percutaneous Screw Fixation Without Fracture Site Preparation in the Treatment of Fifth Metatarsal Base Nonunion

Nonunion after a proximal fifth metatarsal fracture can cause considerable pain, with high morbidity and loss of work. Although many authors advocate early surgical management of zone 3 injuries (Jones fractures), zone 1 and 2 fractures are generally expected to heal with conservative management. Uncommonly, zone 1 and 2 fractures can develop nonunions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of closed intramedullary screw fixation for nonunions of the fifth metatarsal base. We performed a prospective study involving all fifth metatarsal base nonunions treated in our department over 2 years. Only minimally displaced adult fractures were considered for this study. The fracture pattern was categorized using the Dameron classification (zone 1, styloid process; zone 2, metadiaphyseal area; zone 3, proximal diaphysis). All nonunions were fixed percutaneously under radiographic guidance, without fracture site preparation. Zone 1 injuries were fixed using a 3-mm headless compression screw, and those of zones 2 and 3, with an intramedullary 4-mm screw. Of 30 patients included in this study, a minimum 6-month clinical follow-up was obtained. The average time from injury to treatment was 5.9 months (range 3 to 36). There were no smokers in this patient cohort. There were 12 zone 1 injuries, 9 zone 2 injuries, and 9 zone 3 injuries. All patients achieved union by 3 months after screw fixation, with 29 of 30 achieving union by 6 weeks. All patients had resolution of symptoms. There were no complications. We conclude that percutaneous fixation of fifth metatarsal base nonunions, without fracture site preparation, achieves excellent results. We believe that the screw alters the strain of the fracture, thus promoting fibrous-to-osseous conversion and therefore union.

Stress Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal in Athletes

Stress fractures of the fifth metatarsal (zones 2 and 3) remain a challenging clinical problem. It has been well established that nonsurgical treatment has unacceptably high nonunion and refracture rates. Surgical fixation remains the treatment of choice in the athletic cohort, and intramedullary screw fixation with a solid screw has been established as the most predictable means of achieving a successful outcome. Recently, the use of a plantar plate has also been advocated as has been shown in some studies to be more biomechanically advantageous. The use of bone grafting at the primary surgery and morphology and screw type are also important decisions to be made when treating these patients. This review will discuss our management of both primary fractures and refractures of the fifth metatarsal in athletes.

Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Professional Soccer Players: Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Fifth metatarsal fractures occur mainly in young athletes, with an estimated incidence of 1.8 per 1000 individuals per year. This study aims to evaluate the functional outcome of professional soccer players undergoing surgical treatment of fifth metatarsal base fractures.

METHODS

We appraised 34 soccer players operated on from July 2001 to June 2016. All individuals were assessed by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after surgery, with a mean 23-month follow-up. The need for grafting, fracture healing, Torg classification, and return to sports were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 10 attackers, 7 offensive-defensive midfielders, 6 side defenders, 5 central defensive midfielders, 3 defenders, 2 goalkeepers, and 1 defensive midfielder, at an average age of 19 years. Preoperative and postoperative AOFAS averaged 42 and 99 points, respectively, whereas VAS scores were 6 and 0. The longer the time to get operated on, the greater was the need for grafting (P = .011). In our study, all fractures have consolidated. Return to sports occurred, on average, 73 days after surgical treatment, and it was not influenced by the time to get operated on, fracture healing, Torg classification, and grafting.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of the fifth metatarsal base fracture in professional soccer players presents good clinical results. Getting back to activities after surgery is not influenced by surgery time, fracture healing, Torg classification, and grafting.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Therapeutic studies, Case series.

Radiographic analysis of specific morphometrics and patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS) for surgical repair of zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures

BACKGROUND

Zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures are often treated with intramedullary fixation due to an increased risk of nonunion. A previous 3-dimensional (3D) computerized tomography (CT) imaging study by our group determined that the screw should stop short of the bow of the metatarsal and be larger than the commonly used 4.5 millimeter (mm) screw. This study determines how these guidelines translate to operative outcomes, measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) surveys. Radiographic variables measuring the height of the medial longitudinal arch and degree of metatarsus adductus were also obtained to determine if these measurements had any effect on outcomes. And lastly, this study aimed to determine if morphologic differences between males and females affected surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 23 patients (14 male, 9 female) who met inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients completed PROMIS surveys. Preoperative PROMIS surveys were completed prior to surgery, rather than retroactively. Weightbearing radiographs were also obtained preoperatively to assist with surgical planning and postoperatively to assess interval healing. Correlation coefficients were calculated between PROMIS scores and repair characteristics (hardware characteristics [screw length and diameter] and radiographic measurements of specific morphometric features). T tests determined the relationship between repair characteristics, PROMIS scores, and incidence of operative complications. PROMIS scores and correlation coefficients were also stratified by gender.

RESULTS

The average screw length and diameter adhered to guidelines from our previous study. Preoperatively, mean PROMIS PI = 57.26±11.03 and PROMIS PF = 42.27±15.45 after injury. Postoperatively, PROMIS PI = 44.15±7.36 and PROMIS PF = 57.22±10.93. Patients with complications had significantly worse postoperative PROMIS PF scores (p=0.0151) and PROMIS PI scores (p=0.003) compared to patients without complications. Females had non-significantly worse preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores compared to males and had a higher complication rate (33 percent versus 21 percent, respectively). Metatarsus adductus angle was shown to exhibit a significant moderate inverse relationship with postoperative PROMIS PF scores in the overall cohort (r=-0.478; p=0.045). Metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.606; p=0.008), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.592; p=0.01), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.529; p=0.024) demonstrated significant inverse relationships with change in PROMIS PF scores for the overall cohort. Within the male subcohort, significant relationships were found between the change in PROMIS PF and metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.7526; p=0.005), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.7539; p=0.005), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.627; p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated according to guidelines from our prior study achieved satisfactory patient reported and radiographic outcomes. Screws larger than 4.5mm did not lead to hardware complications, including screw failure, iatrogenic fractures, or cortical blowouts. Females had non-significantly lower preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores and were more likely to suffer complications compared to males. Patients with complications, higher arched feet, or greater metatarsus adductus angles had worse functional outcomes. Future studies should better characterize whether patients with excessive lateral column loading benefit from an off-loading cavus orthotic or plantar-lateral plating.

Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Athletes: Management of Acute and Chronic Conditions

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are common in the athlete and can be a source of significant, temporary disability and missed playing time. The pattern of fracture can vary, and the type of fracture leads to a significantly different prognosis and treatment. Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal are particularly common and difficult to treat in the athlete, can have recurrence and refracture, and require expertise to heal. Intramedullary screw fixation is currently the preferred method of fixation. Most other (non-Jones fractures and os vesalianum) proximal fifth metatarsal fractures can be treated successfully without surgery.

Conservative treatment of refractures after modified tension band wiring of fifth metatarsal base stress fractures in athletes

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent fifth metatarsal base stress fractures (MT5-BSF) in athletes present a challenging problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the result of conservative treatment for the refracture of MT5-BSF after modified tension band wiring (MTBW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The outcomes of 15 elite athletes undergoing conservative treatment for refracture of MT5-BSF after MTBW were retrospectively reviewed. They were instructed to avoid weight-bearing with short leg cast for 6 weeks. After that, they started partial weight with a postop shoe. Stepwise exercise followed bone union by radiographs.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases (86.6%) had a complete bone union after a mean of 18.9 ± 8.6 weeks. Twelve cases (80%) returned to their previous activity level and maintained for at least two consecutive seasons.

CONCLUSION

Eighty percent of all athletic patients with the conservative treatment for refractures with healed MT5-BSF after MTBW on the plantar-lateral side could maintain and return to their previous sports activity for at least 2 years.

Hard-Soled Shoe Versus Short Leg Cast for a Fifth Metatarsal Base Avulsion Fracture: A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether tolerated weight-bearing in a hard-soled shoe was noninferior to the use of a short leg cast for the treatment of a fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture, as assessed with use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 6 months after the fracture.

METHODS

A total of 145 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 96 patients were randomly assigned to either the hard-soled shoe group (46 patients) or the cast group (50 patients). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference on the 100-mm VAS between groups at 6 months after the fracture. Secondary outcome measures included the time to return to preinjury activity and patient-reported satisfaction. Analysis was performed according to both an intention-to-treat basis (i.e., patients were included in the assessment of their assigned treatment arm, even if they crossed over to the other treatment arm prior to completing the 6-month follow-up) and a per-protocol basis (i.e., patients who completed the 6-month follow-up were analyzed according to the treatment they received).

RESULTS

At 6 months after the fracture, the mean 100-mm VAS was 8.6 ± 7.0 mm in the hard-soled shoe group and 9.8 ± 7.3 mm in the cast group (p = 0.41) according to intention-to-treat analysis. The mean difference in 100-mm VAS between the 2 groups was -1.3 mm (95% confidence interval, -4.3 to 1.8 mm). The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval did not exceed the noninferiority margin of 10 mm, indicating that treatment with the hard-soled shoe was noninferior to treatment with the short leg cast. The proportion of patients who reported satisfaction with their treatment was similar between the hard-soled shoe and cast groups (89.5% compared with 87.5%, respectively; p = 0.79), but the time to return to preinjury activity was significantly shorter in the hard-soled shoe group (37.2 ± 14.4 days compared with 43.0 ± 11.1 days in the cast group; p = 0.04). There were no cases of nonunion in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-bearing as tolerated in a hard-soled shoe for a fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture was noninferior to the use of a short leg cast as assessed with use of a 100-mm VAS at 6 months after the fracture. Patient-reported satisfaction was similar between groups, but the time to return to preinjury activity was shorter in the hard-soled shoe group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Adequate union rates for the treatment of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the bone healing, clinical, and return to daily activity outcomes after either surgical or conservative management of acute zone 1, 2, and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies published from the earliest record to January 2019 using EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. All articles assessing clinical outcomes of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures were included. Bone healing and clinical outcomes were thereafter calculated using a simplified pooling method.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles comprising of a total of 1,239 fractures were included, of which one was a randomized controlled trial, seven were prospective studies, and 24 were retrospective studies. 627 zone 1 fractures demonstrated union rates of 93.2% following conservative treatment and 95.1% following surgical treatment. Conservatively managed zone 1 fractures were displaced 49.5% of the time, compared to a rate of 92.8% for the surgically treated cases. For Jones' (zone 2) fractures, bone healing outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment showed union rates of 77.4% versus 96.3%, refracture rates of 2.4% versus 2.1%, and mean time to union of 11.0 weeks versus 9.4 weeks, respectively. Only ten proximal diaphyseal (zone 3) fractures were reported, with a mean return to work of 8.2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Acute zone 1 fractures are preferably treated conservatively as similar union rates were found after both conservative and surgical management. In contradistinction, acute zone 2 fractures demonstrate higher union rates and faster time to union when treated surgically. The outcomes of acute zone 3 fractures are rarely reported in the literature, so treatment recommendations remain unclear. Further research of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures is warranted to provide more definitive conclusions, but current findings can aid surgeons during the shared clinical decision making process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

High union rates following surgical treatment of proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to determine the union rate and time for surgical- and non-surgical treatment of stress fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal (MT5). The secondary purpose was to assess the rate of adverse bone healing events (delayed union, non-union, and refractures) as well as the return to sports time and rate.

METHODS

A literature search of the EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases until March 2020 was conducted. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcomes were the union time and rate. Secondary outcomes included the delayed union rate, non-union rate, refracture rate, and return to sport time and rate. A simplified pooling technique was used to analyse the different outcomes (i.e. union rate, time to union, adverse bone healing rates, return to sport rate, and return to sport time) per treatment modality. Additionally, 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the union rate, adverse bone healing rates, and the return to sport rate.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 2753 articles, of which thirteen studies were included. A total of 393 fractures, with a pooled mean follow-up of 52.5 months, were assessed. Overall, the methodological quality of the included articles was low. The pooled bone union rate was 87% (95% CI 83-90%) and 56% (95% CI 41-70%) for surgically and non-surgically treated fractures, respectively. The pooled radiological union time was 13.1 weeks for surgical treatment and 20.9 weeks for non-surgical treatment. Surgical treatment resulted in a delayed union rate of 3% (95% CI 1-5%), non-union rate of 4% (95% CI 2-6%) and refracture rate of 7% (95% CI 4-10%). Non-surgical treatment resulted in a delayed union rate of 0% (95% CI 0-8%), a non-union rate of 33% (95% CI 20-47%) and a refracture rate of 12% (95% CI 5-24%), respectively. The return to sport rate (at any level) was 100% for both treatment modalities. Return to pre-injury level of sport time was 14.5 weeks (117 fractures) for surgical treatment and 9.9 weeks (6 fractures) for non-surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of stress fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal results in a higher bone union rate and a shorter union time than non-surgical treatment. Additionally, surgical and non-surgical treatment both showed a high return to sport rate (at any level), albeit with limited clinical evidence for non-surgical treatment due to the underreporting of data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review.

Changes in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Over 12 Months After a Tibial Bone Stress Injury Diagnosis: Implications for Return to Sports and Military Duty

BACKGROUND

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) occur in up to 20% of runners and military personnel. Typically, after a period of unloading and gradual return to weightbearing activities, athletes return to unrestricted sports participation or military duty approximately 4 to 14 weeks after a BSI diagnosis, depending on the injury location and severity. However, the time course of the recovery of the bone's mechanical competence is not well-characterized, and reinjury rates are high.

PURPOSE

To assess the bone microarchitecture and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) over 12 months after a tibial BSI diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 female athletes from the local community (aged 18-35 years) with a tibial BSI (grade ≥2 of 4 on magnetic resonance imaging) for this prospective observational study. Participants completed a baseline visit within 3 weeks of the diagnosis. At baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after the BSI diagnosis, we collected high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans of the ultradistal tibia (4% of tibial length) of the injured and uninjured legs as well as pain and physical activity assessment findings.

RESULTS

From baseline to 12 weeks after the diagnosis, total, trabecular, and cortical vBMD declined by 0.58% to 0.94% (P < .05 for all) in the injured leg. Total and trabecular vBMD also declined by 0.61% and 0.67%, respectively, in the uninjured leg (P < .05 for both). At 24 weeks, mean values for all bone parameters were nearly equivalent to baseline values, and by 52 weeks, several mean values had surpassed baseline values. Of the 30 participants, 10 incurred a subsequent BSI during the course of the study, and 1 of these 10 incurred 2 subsequent BSIs. Participants who suffered an additional BSI were younger and had a later age of menarche, a greater incidence of previous fractures, and lower serum parathyroid hormone levels (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Bone density declined in both the injured and the uninjured legs and, on average, did not return to baseline for 3 to 6 months after a tibial BSI diagnosis. The observed time to the recovery of baseline vBMD, coupled with the high rate of recurrent BSIs, suggests that improved return-to-sports and military duty guidelines may be in order.

Optimizing Return to Play for Common and Controversial Foot and Ankle Sports Injuries

»

Surgical decision-making should consider factors to help optimize return to play for athletes with foot and ankle injuries, including injuries to the syndesmosis, the Achilles tendon, the fifth metatarsal, and the Lisfranc complex. Understanding influential factors on return to play may help orthopaedic surgeons counsel athletes and coaches on expectations for a timeline to return to play and performance metrics.

»

Outcomes after rigid and flexible fixation for syndesmotic injuries are generally favorable. Some data support an earlier return to sport and higher functional scores with flexible fixation, in addition to lower rates of reoperation and a decreased incidence of malreduction, particularly with deltoid repair, if indicated.

»

Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair have been shown to have a decreased risk of wound complications. Athletes undergoing Achilles repair should expect to miss a full season of play to recover.

»

Athletes with fifth metatarsal fractures have better return-to-play outcomes with surgical management and can expect a high return-to-play rate within approximately 3 months of surgery.

»

Percutaneous treatment of Lisfranc injuries may expedite return to play relative to open procedures.

Jones Fracture in the Nonathletic Population

Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are common injuries with a unique history. Treatment of these fractures is controversial partly because of confusion regarding fracture subtype nomenclature. Today "Jones fracture" refers to proximal fifth metatarsal fracture in zones 2 or 3. Zone 2 fractures are acute injuries, and their optimal treatment is unclear. Zone 3 fractures commonly occur in the presence of a chronic stress reaction. Because of poor healing potential, zone 3 fractures typically require operative treatment. Zone 1 fractures have excellent healing potential and may be treated nonoperatively with a weightbearing as tolerated protocol.

A Narrative Review of Metatarsal Bone Stress Injury in Athletic Populations: Etiology, Biomechanics, and Management

Metatarsal bone stress injuries (BSIs) are common in athletic populations. BSIs are overuse injuries that result from an accumulation of microdamage that exceeds bone remodeling. Risk for metatarsal BSI is multifactorial and includes factors related to anatomy, biology, and biomechanics. In this article, anatomic factors including foot type, metatarsal length, bone density, bone geometry, and intrinsic muscle strength, which each influence how the foot responds to load, are discussed. Biologic factors such as low energy availability and impaired bone metabolism influence the quality of the bone. Finally, the influence of biomechanical loads to bone such as peak forces, load rates, and loading cycles are reviewed. General management of metatarsal BSI is discussed, including acute care, rehabilitation, treatment of refractory metatarsal BSI, and evaluation of healing/return to sport. Finally, we identify future research priorities and emerging treatments for metatarsal BSI.

Rate of Delayed Union With Early Weightbearing Following Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Jones Fractures

BACKGROUND

Jones fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal are predisposed to delayed union and nonunion due to a tenuous blood supply. Solid intramedullary (IM) screw fixation is recommended to improve healing, traditionally followed by delayed weightbearing (DWB). However, early weightbearing (EWB) postoperatively may facilitate functional recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare union rates and time to union after solid IM screw fixation of Jones fractures in patients treated with an EWB protocol to those treated with a DWB protocol, as well as to identify any factors that may be predictive of delayed or nonunion.

METHODS

True Jones (zone 2 fifth metatarsal base) fractures treated from April 2012 through January 2018 with IM screw fixation and 6 months follow-up were identified (41 fractures in 40 patients; mean ± SD age, 45.3 ± 17.9 years). Patients were divided into EWB and DWB cohorts (within or beyond 2 weeks, respectively). Delayed union (12.5 weeks) was statistically derived from established literature. Union times were compared between cohorts. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate possible confounders contributing to delayed union. There were 20 fractures in the EWB cohort and 21 fractures in the DWB cohort.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in healing times (EWB: 25% by 6th week, 55% by the 12th week, 20% delayed; DWB: 33% by 6th week, 43% by 12th week, 24% delayed; P = .819) or delayed unions (EWB, 20% vs DWB, 24%; P > .999). There were no nonunions. No significant confounding risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative protocols using early weightbearing following solid IM screw fixation of Jones fractures appear to be safe and do not delay fracture healing or increase the risk of delayed union. Older age may be a risk for delayed union, but larger studies are needed to evaluate this with appropriate power in light of possible confounders. EWB protocols may allow better functional recovery without compromising outcomes by increasing the risk of delayed union.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III, retrospective comparative study.

How useful are virtual fracture clinics?: a systematic review

Background

Due to the overwhelming demand for trauma services, resulting from increasing emergency department attendances over the past decade, virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become the fashion to keep up with the demand and help comply with the BOA Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines. In this article, we perform a systematic review asking, “How useful are VFCs?”, and what injuries and conditions can be treated safely and effectively, to help decrease patient face to face consultations. Our primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, clinical efficiency and cost analysis, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of all papers pertaining to VFCs, using the search engines PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Searches were carried out and screened by two authors, with final study eligibility confirmed by the senior author.

Results

In total, 21 records were relevant to our research question. Six orthopaedic injuries were identified as suitable for VFC review, with a further four discussed in detail. A reduction of face to face appointments of up to 50% was reported with greater compliance to BOAST guidelines (46.4%) and cost saving (up to £212,000).

Conclusions

This systematic review demonstrates that the VFC model can help deliver a safe, more cost-effective, and more efficient arm of the trauma service to patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:683–690.

Jones Fracture Management in Athletes

Jones fractures in both elite and recreational athletes are best treated with surgical fixation, given superior results as compared to nonoperative management. While screw specifics remain controversial, intramedullary screw fixation is established as the standard surgical technique. Plate fixation also has shown excellent outcomes. Complications of refracture, nonunion, and delayed union require careful evaluation for contributions of early return to play, implant characteristics, and anatomic/metabolic abnormality. Revision fixation with autograft and biologic augmentation is supported in the literature, with ongoing inquiry to optimizing specific implants and adjuvants.

Comparison of operative and non-operative management of fifth metatarsal base fracture: A meta-analysis

Fracture to fifth metatarsal's base is one the most common injury experienced at the foot. Studies have for long debated the use of operative and non-operative interventions for the management of the fracture, especially owing to its peculiar vasculature. However, to date, no attempt has been made to synthesize the evidence comparing the efficacy of operative and non-operative interventions for managing the fifth metatarsal's base fracture. To meta-statistically compare the effects of operative and non-operative management of fifth metatarsal base fracture. A systematic identification of literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on four academic databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. A meta-analysis evaluated the influence of operative and non-operative interventions on rate of non-union, mean duration of union, duration of return to activity, duration of return to sport, visual analog scale, and the American orthopedic foot & ankle scale. Out of 1,170 records, 11 articles including 404 participants (mean age: 29.8 ± 7.4 years) were included in this review. This systematic review presents a 1b level of evidence supporting the use of operative interventions for enhancing fracture union as compared to non-operative interventions. The meta-analysis reveals beneficial effects for operative interventions by demonstrating medium to large effect reduction of rate of non-union (Hedge's g: -0.66), duration of union (-1.7), duration of return to activity (-2.07), visual analog scale (-0.86), and enhancement of the American orthopedic foot & ankle scale score (0.73) as compared to non-operative intervention. The current systematic review and meta-analysis recommend the use of operative interventions for managing the fifth metatarsal's base fracture. The review reports beneficial effects of operative interventions as compared to non-operative interventions for reducing the rate of non-union, duration of union, duration of return to activity, duration of return to sport, visual analog scale, and increasing the American orthopedic foot & ankle scale score.

Recurrent fifth metatarsal stress fractures in a professional soccer player with hypoparathyroidism: a case report

Background

Hypoparathyroidism is characterized by low or inappropriately normal levels of parathyroid hormone leading to hypocalcemia. In this report, a case of recurrent fifth metatarsal stress fractures in a professional soccer player with hypoparathyroidism is presented.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old male professional soccer player developed left foot pain. He had no specific medical or family history. He was diagnosed with a fifth metatarsal stress fracture and underwent osteosynthesis with a cannulated cancellous screw 3 days after the injury. After three and a half months, the X-ray showed bone union, and he returned to full sports activity. However, he felt pain in his left foot again, and a re-fracture was found on X-ray a week later. Osteosynthesis was performed again. Two months after re-operation, the cause of re-fracture was investigated. Laboratory results showed abnormally low levels of serum calcium (8.4 mg/dL) and intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH: 19.0 pg/mL). However, other laboratory examinations were normal. Therefore, he was diagnosed with primary hypoparathyroidism according to the diagnostic criteria. Medical treatment was started with alfacalcidol 1.0 μg/day. One month after starting medication, the serum calcium improved to 9.4 mg/dL. Four months after the re-operation, the X-ray showed bone union, and he was therefore allowed to play soccer. While he played professional soccer, there were no new subjective complaints.

Conclusions

Hypoparathyroidism may be one of the risk factors for stress fractures. We believe that serum calcium levels should be checked in patients with stress fractures, and if the serum calcium is low, hypoparathyroidism should be considered.