Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Hip Fracture Care

Ethnic and racial minority patients are under-represented in US clinical trials for surgical management of hip fractures

INTRODUCTION

The impact of social determinants on clinical outcomes following surgeries for orthopaedic injuries are well-documented. In this study, we sought to quantify the representation of women, racial, and ethnic minorities in US-based clinical trials for hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of patients enrolled in US-based, interventional clinical trials for hip fractures registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (2000-2022). Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for demographic groups in clinical trials relative to their prevalence among patients receiving hip fracture surgery in the National Inpatient Sample (2006-2015). PPRs between 0.8-1.2 were considered equitable representation. PPRs<0.8 were considered underrepresentation and PPRs>1.2 were considered overrepresentation. Temporal trends were analyzed between previous (2000-2010) and contemporary (2011-2022) periods.

RESULTS

There were thirty-eight hip fracture clinical trials involving 6937 participants included in this study. All clinical trials reported sex, but only sixteen trials (42 %) reported race and ten trials (26 %) reported ethnicity. In total, trial participants were predominately White (89.3 %) and female (68.0 %). Few patients were non-White including Asian (7.2 %), Black (2.1 %), and Hispanic (0.8 %). Female (PPR=0.97) and male (PPR=1.07) patients had equitable representation. However, Hispanic (PPR=0.22), and African American (PPR=0.51) patients were underrepresented. White patients (PPR=1.00) had equitable representation while Asian patients were overrepresented (PPR=4.50). The rate of race (P < 0.001) and ethnicity (P = 0.010) reporting increased between previous and contemporary periods.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities into hip fracture clinical trials remains limited. The impact of social determinants on outcomes after trauma surgery requires equitable representation of all groups in clinical trials to ensure translatability of results. Stakeholders across healthcare, industry, and government must work to address these disparities.

A Higher Area Deprivation Index Is Associated With Increased Medical Complications and Emergency Department Utilizations After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a weighted index comprised of 17 census-based markers of material deprivation and poverty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in areas of high ADI (greater disadvantage) were associated with differences in 90 days: 1) medical complications; 2) emergency department (ED) utilizations; and 3) readmissions.

METHODS

A nationwide database was queried for primary THA patients from 2010 to 2020. The ADI is reported on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater disadvantage. Patients undergoing primary THA in regions associated with high ADI (90%+) were compared to those of lower ADI (0 to 89%). A total of 138,670 patients were evenly matched between the two cohorts following 1:1 propensity score matching by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Primary endpoints were 90-day medical complications, ED utilizations, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression models calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values less than 0.01 were statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THA from high ADI had significantly higher rates and odds of developing any medical complications (13.0 versus 11.9%; OR: 1.09, P < 0.0001), including acute kidney injuries (1.8 versus 1.5%; OR: 1.20, P < 0.0001), myocardial infarctions (0.35 versus 0.24%; OR: 1.45, P = 0.0003), and surgical site infections (0.94 versus 0.76%; OR: 1.23, P = 0.0004). High-ADI patients had significantly higher rates and odds of ED visits within 90 days (3.94 versus 3.67%; OR: 1.08, P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in readmissions (5.44 versus 5.69%; OR: 0.95, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients have increased odds of 90-days medical complications and ED utilizations, despite comparable 90-day readmission rates. Measures of neighborhood disadvantage may be valuable metrics to inform health care policy and improve postdischarge care.

Patient race and ethnicity are associated with higher unplanned 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions but not 10-year all-cause complications or reoperations: a matched cohort analysis of primary shoulder arthroplasties

Background

Within orthopedic surgery, there remain limited data evaluating the impact of racial and socioeconomic disparities on outcomes of primary shoulder arthroplasty (SA) over time. As such, we analyzed both short- and longer-term outcome differences in complications, reoperations, and revision surgery of primary SA when performed in non-White patients when compared to a matched cohort of White patients who had undergone SA.

Methods

Over a 39-year period (1981-2020), an institutional Total Joint Registry Database was utilized to identify all non-White patients (Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic or Latino, American Indian/Alaska Native, other) who underwent primary SA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The search identified 275 primary SA (46 hemiarthroplasties, 97 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, and 132 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties). The ethnicity composition was 8.7% Asian, 27.3% Black, 37.8% Hispanic, 12.4% American Indian, and 13.8% other. This cohort was matched 1:2 according to age, sex, diagnosis, implant, and surgical year to a control group of 550 White patients who had undergone SA. The rates of medical and surgical complications, reoperations, revisions, and implant survivorship were assessed. The mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 2 to 40 years).

Results

Comparisons between the non-White and White matched cohorts demonstrated a higher rate of tobacco use (14.2% vs. 10.5%; P < .001), diabetes (21.5% vs. 11.8%; P < .001), length of stay (1.9 vs. 1.6 days; P = .014), and a lower rate of private commercial insurance (27.3% vs. 44.5%; P < .001 in the non-White cohort. Within the first 90 days after surgery, non-White patients had a higher rate of emergency department visits (5.5% vs. 0.9%; P < .001) and unplanned readmissions (2.9% vs. 0.7%; P = .014). After the first 90 postoperative days, there were no differences regarding medical (1.8% vs. 0.7%; P = .135) or surgical complications (12.0% vs. 13.6%; P = .446). Ten-year survivorship free of all-cause complication (76.8% vs. 81.5%; P = .370), reoperation (84.9% vs. 89.8%; P = .492), and revision (89.3% vs. 91.4%; P = .715) were similar between the non-White and White cohorts.

Discussion

After accounting for age, sex, and surgical indication, patient race and ethnicity were not associated with an increased risk of long-term all-cause complications, reoperations, or revision surgery after primary SA. However, within the first 90 postoperative days, non-White patients had a higher likelihood of unplanned emergency room visits and readmissions.

Demographic Differences in the Surgical Management of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Background Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are the most common long bone fractures in the United States and are associated with significant morbidity and the potential need for revision surgeries, with many patients requiring reoperation. This can have significant physical, mental, and financial impacts on patients. A major complication faced by patients with TSF is nonunion (TSFN). The mainstay of surgical management of TSF is Intramedullary Nail (IMN), with some patients also being treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). With the demographic makeup of the United States undergoing rapid change, a better understanding of patient characteristics of patients with TSF is useful to optimize patient care. This study aims to enhance our comprehension of the frequency and demographic variables associated with tibia fracture surgery and subsequent nonunion. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in August 2023, utilizing the TriNetX "Global Collaborative Network" database to form patient study cohorts. Data extracted included patient age, sex, ethnicity, race, smoking status, surgical management, and nonunion. Data was also extracted on specific surgical management utilized, comprising either IMN or ORIF. Results A total of 6,389 cases of TSFs were analyzed, with 65% (4,153) of patients undergoing ORIF compared to IMN (35%, or 2,236). The overall incidence of patients with TSF ORIF and IMN was highest among males and White patients. The incidence of patients with TSF ORIF was highest in the age groups of 40-64 and 64-90 years, while TSF IMN was highest in the age groups of 18-39 and 40-64 years. The overall rate of tibia nonunion among patients with a TSF ORIF was 4.6%, vs. 2.6% in patients who underwent IMN. Conclusion TSFs treated with IMN were found to have lower rates of nonunion compared to ORIF. IMN of TSF was more common in younger patients, while ORIF was more common in the older age groups. ORIF and IMN had similar rates of male-to-female utilization, indicating that both genders are being treated similarly with regard to the operative method of choice. White patients and those who were not Hispanic or Latino had much higher rates of both IMN and ORIF compared to all other racial groups, despite the increased complexity of fracture/injury characteristics and higher complication rates in minority patients.

Prevalence of complications in older adults after hip fracture surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Older adults with hip fractures are at high risk of experiencing complications after surgery, but estimates of the rate of specific complications vary by study design and follow-up period. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of complications in older adults after hip fracture surgery.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception until 30 June 2023. Studies were included if they reported prevalence data of complications in an unselected, consecutive population of older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Results

A total of 95 studies representing 2,521,300 patients were included. For surgery-specific complications, the 30-day prevalence of reoperation was 2.31%, surgical site infection 1.69%, and deep surgical site infection 0.98%; the 365-day prevalence of prosthesis dislocation was 1.11%, fixation failure 1.77%, and periprosthetic or peri-implant fracture 2.23%. For general complications, the 30-day prevalence of acute kidney injury was 1.21%, blood transfusion 25.55%, cerebrovascular accident 0.79%, lower respiratory tract infection 4.08%, myocardial infarction 1.98%, urinary tract infection 7.01%, and venous thromboembolism 2.15%.

Conclusion

Complications are prevalent in older adults who have had surgery for a hip fracture. Studies reporting complications after hip fracture surgery varied widely in terms of quality, and we advocate for the routine monitoring of complications in registries and clinical trials to improve the quality of evidence.

Patients Residing in Areas of Increased Social Vulnerability Are at an Increased Risk for Prolonged Length of Stay and Mortality After Hip Fracture Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing hip fracture surgery face notable risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and racial and socioeconomic disparities in outcomes exist. This study examined the effect of social vulnerability on outcomes after hip fracture surgery using the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 464 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery at a single institution from July 2020 to June 2023 was conducted. Demographics, comorbidities, time to surgery, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with low versus high social vulnerability. SVI was calculated based on patient's zip code of residence. The 50th percentile of national SVI scores was used to divide patients into low and high vulnerability groups. Univariate and multivariable analyses were done to compare patient characteristics and outcomes between the groups. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

No notable differences were observed in demographics, comorbidities, or procedure performed between the groups. Patients with increased social vulnerability had a higher rate of mortality within 1 year (low vulnerability: 12.2 vs. high vulnerability: 24.0%, P = 0.005) and a shorter time to mortality (340.7 vs. 138.9 days, P < 0.001). Patients with higher social vulnerability had longer LOS (β = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.35-1.88, P = 0.004), were 2.37 times more likely to experience mortality within 1 year (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.30-4.27, P = 0.004), and 1.75 times more likely to experience mortality at any time (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01-2.99, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Patients residing in areas of increased social vulnerability were more likely to experience a longer LOS, and more likely to die within 1 year, or at any time after undergoing hip fracture surgery, when compared with those living less socially vulnerable regions. These findings highlight the need for interventions aimed at addressing social factors within hip fracture care pathways to mitigate socioeconomic disparities in patient outcomes.

Differences in opioid prescriptions by race among U.S. older adults with a hip fracture transitioning to community care

BACKGROUND

Appropriate pain management can facilitate rehabilitation after a hip fracture as patients transition back to the community setting. Differences in opioid prescribing by race may exist during this critical transition period.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older adult U.S. Medicare beneficiaries with a hip fracture to examine whether the receipt and dose of opioids differs between Black and White patients as they transitioned back to the community setting. We stratified beneficiaries by whether they received institutional post-acute care (PAC). Outcomes were (1) receipt of an opioid and (2) opioid doses in the first 90 days in the community in milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs; also presented in mg oxycodone). We estimated relative rates and risk differences of opioid receipt and dose differences using Poisson and linear regression models, respectively, using the parametric g-formula to standardize for age and sex.

RESULTS

We identified 164,170 older adults with hip fracture (mean age = 82.7 years; 75% female; 72% with PAC; 46% with opioid use after fracture). Overall use of opioids in the community was similar between Black and white beneficiaries. Black beneficiaries had lower average doses in their first 90 days in both total cumulative doses (PAC group: 165 [95% CI -264 to -69] fewer MMEs [-248 mg oxycodone]; no PAC: 167 [95% CI -274 to -62] fewer MMEs [-251 mg oxycodone]) and average MME per days' supply of medication (PAC: -3.0 [-4.6 to -1.4] fewer MMEs per day [-4.5 mg oxycodone]; no PAC: -4.7 [-4.6 to -1.4] fewer MMEs per day [-7.1 mg oxycodone]). In secondary analyses, Asian beneficiaries experienced the greatest differences (e.g., 617-653 fewer cumulative mg oxycodone).

CONCLUSION

Racial differences exist in pain management for Medicare beneficiaries after a hip fracture. Future work should examine whether these differences result in disparities in short- and long-term health outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Outpatient Physical Therapy Use After Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there was a racial disparity among Medicare beneficiaries in the likelihood of using outpatient physical therapy (PT) services following a hip fracture. METHODS: Our retrospective descriptive cohort study analyzed administrative claims data for 51 781 Medicare beneficiaries post hip fracture. We examined the association between race and PT use within the first 6 months post fracture using hierarchical logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, medical complexity, and socioeconomic factors. We used Poisson regression to examine the association between race and the number of PT visits. RESULTS: Only 31% of beneficiaries used outpatient PT after hip fracture with significant racial disparities. After controlling for demographics, medical complexity, and socioeconomic factors, Black beneficiaries had 42% lower odds of using PT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51, 0.66) compared to White beneficiaries. Among PT users, Black beneficiaries received fewer visits than White beneficiaries (rate ratio [RR], 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88) with this disparity persisting after adjustments (RR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.91). CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for demographic, medical, and socioeconomic factors, Black beneficiaries were less likely to use outpatient PT following hip fractures. Conditional on an initial PT evaluation, Black beneficiaries received fewer sessions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(12):1-7. Epub 9 October 2024. 10.2519/jospt.2024.12641.

Racial disparities in early postoperative proximal humerus fracture outcomes: Do minorities face longer operative times, extended hospital stays, and higher risks?

Background

Racial disparities in orthopedic surgery outcomes have been extensively documented, highlighting systemic biases in care. Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), about 6% of all fractures, are rising, especially among the elderly. Despite the prevalence of PHFs, a research gap exists regarding racial disparities in postoperative complications and outcomes.

Methods

Data from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2006 to 2021 were analyzed, including 41,285 patients with PHFs. CPT and ICD codes guided inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity-score matching balanced a cohort of 17,052 patients. Demographic variables, comorbidities, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate statistics, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Post propensity-score matching, significant demographic disparities emerged between white and minority patients. Minority patients had longer operative times (p < .001) and hospital stays (p = .001) than white patients. Minority patients also exhibited higher rates of mortality (p = .04) and unplanned re-intubation (p = .04).

Conclusion

This study revealed significant racial disparities in early postoperative outcomes for PHFs. Despite surgical advancements, minorities have prolonged operative times, extended hospital stays, and heightened risks of adverse events. Action is needed to ensure healthcare equity and justice and to address disparities in PHF surgical management across diverse demographics.

Level of evidence

III.

The Prevalence of Acute Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Tibial Tubercle Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Tibial tubercle fractures are a unique class of pediatric orthopaedic injuries that frequently necessitate surgical treatment and strict monitoring due to the associated risk of acute compartment syndrome (ACS). However, current literature is conspicuously limited in its ability to estimate the risk of ACS after these fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to utilize a nationwide database to estimate the prevalence of ACS after pediatric tibial tubercle fractures.

METHODS

We utilized the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Kids' Inpatient Database (2019) to identify all pediatric patients, 18 years of age and under, with isolated tibial tubercle fractures (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision Clinical Modification S82.151-S82.156) and ACS (T79.A0, T79.A2, T79.A29). Patients were excluded if they had additional lower extremity injuries (ie, tibial shaft, plateau, etc). A subanalysis was conducted for those undergoing fasciotomy, with and without an ACS diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 591 isolated tibial tubercle fractures, there were 8 ACS cases for a prevalence of 1.35%. There were 22 (3.72%) additional cases of fasciotomy without an ACS diagnosis. All ACS cases were diagnosed during the original hospitalization; all were male and had closed fractures. The cohort included 469 teenagers (13+ years) and 77 pre-teens, with 40 females and 506 males. Racial demographics: 132 white, 232 black, 112 Hispanic, 15 Asian, 4 Native American, 23 unknown, and 28 others. No significant associations were found between ACS and age, race, insurance status, mechanism of injury, or hospital region.

CONCLUSION

The rate of ACS in pediatric tibial tubercle fractures appears to be much lower than previously reported, at 1.35%. However, the nearly three-fold higher prevalence of fasciotomy without an ACS diagnosis, suggests a generous use of prophylactic fasciotomies and/or an undercharacterization of actual ACS cases from miscoding. This is the first and largest study to employ a nationally representative database to investigate the prevalence of ACS after tibial tubercle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Achieving Health Equity: Combatting the Disparities in American Access to Musculoskeletal Care : Disparities Exist in Every Aspect of Orthopaedic Care in the United States - Access to Outpatient Visits, Discretionary and Unplanned Surgical Care, and Postoperative Outcomes. What Can We Do?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Healthcare disparities influence multiple dimensions of orthopaedic care including access, burden and incidence of disease, and outcome in varying populations. These disparities impact healthcare at both the micro and macro scale of the healthcare experience from individual patient-physician relationships to reimbursement rates across the United States. This article provides a review of how healthcare disparities contribute to the landscape of orthopaedic care and specifically highlights how disparities affect outpatient visits, discretionary and unplanned surgical care, and postoperative outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research demonstrates the widespread presence of healthcare disparities in the field of orthopaedics and gives both objective and subjective evidence confirming disparities' measurable influence. The disparities most highlighted by our review include differences in orthopaedic care based on insurance type and race. Currently disparities in orthopaedic care are deeply connected to patient insurance status and race. In the outpatient setting insurance significantly impacts access to care, travel burden, and utilization of services. The emergent setting is similarly influenced with measurable differences in lack of access to acute care, rates of inappropriate triage, and timeliness of care based on insurance status and race. Additionally, the postoperative period is not immune to disparities with likelihood of follow up, experience of catastrophic medical expenses, and postoperative outcomes also being affected. Addressing these disparities is a pressing need and may include solutions like wider expansion and acceptance of publicly funded insurance and the development of readily available and easily measurable metrics for healthcare equity and quality in vulnerable populations.

Payer Status and Racial Disparities in Time to Surgery for Emergent Orthopaedic Procedures

INTRODUCTION

Delay in surgical management for orthopaedic emergencies and severe fracture types can result in notable morbidity and even mortality for patients. Disparities in various facets of orthopaedic care have been identified based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and payer status, but disparities in time to surgery have been poorly explored. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to investigate whether disparities exist in time to emergent orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, septic hip, or cauda equina syndrome over 2012 to 2020 were identified using national data. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payer status, socioeconomic status, hospital setting, and comorbidities to examine the effect of payer status and race/ethnicity, on time to surgery.

RESULTS

Over 2012 to 2020, 247,370 patients underwent surgery for hip fracture, 64,827 for femur fracture, 14,130 for pelvic fracture, 14,979 for septic knee, 3,205 for septic hip, and 4,730 for cauda equina syndrome. On multivariable analysis, patients with Medicaid experienced significantly longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all). Black patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, septic knee, septic hip, and cauda equina syndrome, and Hispanic patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study demonstrate that Medicaid-insured patients, and often minority patients, experience longer delays to surgery than privately insured and White patients. Future work should endeavor to identify causes of these disparities to promote creation of policies aimed at improving timely access to care for Medicaid-insured and minority patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Rates of Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Athlete-Specific Sports Medicine Research: A Systematic Review

Background

Race- and ethnicity-based differences in treatment access and outcomes have been reported in the orthopaedic sports medicine literature. However, the rate at which race and ethnicity are reported and incorporated into the statistical analysis of sports medicine studies remains unclear.

Purpose

To determine the rate at which race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in athlete-specific sports medicine literature.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, articles published by the 3 journals of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine between 2017 and 2021 were considered for inclusion. Original sports medicine research studies that focused on athletes were included. Outcome measures included reporting and analysis of patient demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity). Studies that included demographic variables in a multivariate analysis or that performed a race-/ethnicity-based stratified analyses were considered to have analyzed that variable. Studies that reported and/or analyzed patient demographics were examined. Chi-square tests were performed to determine statistical significance.

Results

A total of 5140 publications were screened, and 842 met the inclusion criteria. Age and sex were well reported (84.1% and 87.0%, respectively), while race (3.8%) and ethnicity (2.0%) were poorly reported. There was no difference in rates of reporting age, sex, race, or ethnicity between the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM), the Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), or Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Sports Health). The rate of analysis was also calculated as a percentage of the studies that reported that variable. Of the studies that reported age, 38.5% analyzed age. Using this method, 26.2% of studies analyzed sex, 40.6% analyzed race, and 17.6% analyzed ethnicity. Although there was no difference in the overall rate at which studies from the 3 journals analyzed ethnicity, Sports Health studies analyzed age (P = .044), sex (P = .001), and race (P = .027) more frequently than studies published in AJSM and OJSM. Of the studies that analyzed race, most of those studies (8/13, 61.5%) found significant race-based differences in reported outcomes.

Conclusion

This systematic review demonstrated that race and ethnicity are poorly reported and analyzed in athlete-specific sports medicine literature, despite the fact that a majority of studies analyzing race found significant differences between racial groups. Improved reporting of race and ethnicity can determine whether race- and ethnicity-based differences exist in patient interventions to ameliorate disparities in patient outcomes.

Disparities Exist in Knowledge of Hip Fracture Compared With Stroke and Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

This study sought to answer the following questions: (1) Are there differences in knowledge on time to treatment (TTT) between stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and hip fractures in the general population? (2) Are there differences in condition-specific knowledge across these conditions? (3) Are there underlying demographic factors that may contribute to differences in hip fracture-specific knowledge?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional cohort analysis. Participants were acquired using an online survey distribution platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Individuals older than 18 years with English fluency and literacy were included. A total of 913 participants who completed a survey with questions on TTT knowledge, condition-specific knowledge, history of hip fracture, and demographics were recruited.

RESULTS

On comparing TTT knowledge, the MI mean score was 36.92% higher than that of hip fractures (P<.0001). On comparing condition-specific knowledge, the MI-specific mean score was 8.24% higher than that of hip fractures (P<.0001). Hip fracture knowledge was associated with demographic factors. Asian and Black participants and participants with Medicaid or Medicare as their primary insurance type were associated with significantly lower hip fracture knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Hip fracture knowledge was significantly lower than MI knowledge in the study population. Just as professional societies have invested resources in public education campaigns on the importance of TTT for stroke and MI, public education campaigns on the importance of TTT for hip fractures may support earlier TTT for populations vulnerable to delays (Asian and Black). [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].

Differences in Perioperative Metrics by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance After Pelvic Fracture: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Disparities in orthopedic trauma care have been reported for racial-ethnic minority and socially disadvantaged patients. We examined differences in perioperative metrics by patient race and ethnicity and insurance after pelvic fracture in a national sample in the United States.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, and Hispanic patients 18 to 64 years old with private, Medicaid, or self-pay insurance who underwent non-elective pelvic fracture surgery. Associations between combined race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and perioperative metrics (time to surgery, length of stay, inhospital complications, institutional discharge) were assessed using multivariable generalized linear and logistic regression models. Adjusted percent differences or odds ratios (ORs) were reported.

RESULTS

A weighted total of 14,375 surgeries were included (68.8% in White patients, 16.1% in Black patients, and 15.1% in Hispanic patients; 60.0% private insurance, 26.3% Medicaid, and 13.7% self-pay). Compared with White patients with private insurance, all Black insurance subgroups had longer length of stay (+15.38% to +38.78%, P≤.001), as did Hispanic patients with Medicaid (+28.03%, P<.001), White patients with Medicaid (+13.08%, P<.001), and White patients with self-pay (+9.47%, P=.04). Additionally, compared with White patients with private insurance, decreased odds of institutional discharge were observed for all patients with self-pay (OR, 0.24-0.37, P<.001) as well as White patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.70, P=.003) and Hispanic patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.57, P=.002). There were no significant adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and in-hospital complications or time to surgery.

CONCLUSION

These differences in perioperative metrics, primarily for Black patients and patients with self-pay insurance, warrant further examination to identify whether they reflect disparities that should be addressed to promote equitable orthopedic trauma care. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e233-e240.].

Insurance Status, Language, and Access to Care for Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Background

Patients with public insurance (PUBs) face more difficulty obtaining orthopaedic appointments and have longer wait times than privately insured patients (PVTs). These delays are associated with greater injury severity at the time of surgery, which affects sports injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament tears where early surgical stabilization leads to better outcomes. Additionally, previous evidence showed that patients with limited English proficiency often must rely on informal translation services, such as family members or friends, to communicate with their orthopaedic surgeons, which may represent a disparity in the care provided.

Hypothesis

It was hypothesized that PUBs would be less likely to obtain an appointment compared with PVTs and that most providers would not offer professional translation services to Spanish-speaking patients.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

The authors called 50 randomly selected orthopaedic surgeons' offices in California specializing in sports medicine to request an appointment. Each office was called 4 times in random order for the hypothetical patient having either private or public insurance and speaking either Spanish or English.

Results

The hypothetical PUB had significantly decreased access to an appointment (19% of offices offered an appointment) when compared to the PVT (73.8% offered an appointment). Independent private practice (IPP) offices were less likely to accept public insurance (13.3%) compared with offices at academic medical centers (57.1%). There was no difference in access to an appointment for the Spanish- versus English-speaking patient. Translation services were offered at 73.8% of the orthopaedic offices.

Conclusion

Overall, the data illustrated disparities in access to pediatric orthopaedic care for PUBs compared to those with private insurance. Disparities were most prominent in IPP settings, which were less likely than academic offices to accept public insurance. Additionally, it was found that 73.8% of the offices the authors contacted offered Spanish translation services. Interventions should focus on increasing acceptance of public insurance and translation services in IPP settings. Future studies should expand this analysis to other languages and investigate the potential impacts of language on the quality of care provided.

Examining treatment targets and equity in bone-active medication use within secondary fracture prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review seeks to evaluate the proportion of fragility fracture patients screened in secondary fracture prevention programs who were indicated for pharmacological treatment, received prescriptions for bone-active medications, and initiated the prescribed medication. Additionally, the study aims to analyze equity in pharmacological treatment by examining equity-related variables including age, sex, gender, race, education, income, and geographic location.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to ascertain the proportion of fragility fracture patients indicated for treatment who received prescriptions and/or initiated bone-active medication through secondary fracture prevention programs. We also examined treatment indications reported in studies and eligibility criteria to confirm patients who were eligible for treatment. To compute the pooled proportions for medication prescription and initiation, we carried out a single group proportional meta-analysis. We also extracted the proportions of patients who received a prescription and/or began treatment based on age, sex, race, education, socioeconomic status, location, and chronic conditions.

RESULTS

This review included 122 studies covering 114 programs. The pooled prescription rate was 77%, and the estimated medication initiation rate was 71%. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in treatment initiation between the Fracture Liaison Service and other programs. Across all studies, age, sex, and socioeconomic status were the only equity variables reported in relation to treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review emphasizes the need for standardized reporting guidelines in post-fracture interventions. Moreover, considering equity stratifiers in the analysis of health outcomes will help address inequities and improve the overall quality and reach of secondary fracture prevention programs.

A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Complications and Health Care Utilizations After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Area Deprivation Index: Consideration of the Disadvantaged Patient

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic risk factor among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We evaluated patients living near neighborhoods with higher socioeconomic risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and if they were associated with differences in the following: (1) medical complications; (2) emergency department (ED) utilizations; (3) readmissions; and (4) costs of care.

METHODS

A query of a national database from 2010 to 2020 was performed for primary TKAs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a weighted index comprised of 17 census-based markers of material deprivation and poverty. Higher numbers indicate a greater disadvantage. Patients undergoing TKA in zip codes associated with high ADI (90%+) were 1:1 propensity-matched to a comparison group by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 225,038 total patients, evenly matched between cohorts. Outcomes studied included complications, ED utilizations, readmission rates, and 90-day costs. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of ADI on the dependent variables. P values less than .003 were significant.

RESULTS

High ADI led to higher rates and odds of any medical complications (11.7 versus 11.0%; OR: 1.05, P = .0006), respiratory failures (0.4 versus 0.3%; OR: 1.28, P = .001), and acute kidney injuries (1.7 versus 1.5%; OR: 1.15, P < .0001). Despite lower readmission rates (2.9 versus 3.5%), high ADI patients had greater 90-day ED visits (4.2 versus 4.0%; OR: 1.07, P = .0008). The 90-day expenditures ($15,066 versus $12,459; P < .0001) were higher in patients who have a high ADI.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients have increased complications and ED utilizations. Neighborhood disadvantage may inform health care policy and improve postdischarge care. The socioeconomic status metrics, including ADI (which captures community effects), should be used to adequately risk-adjust or risk-stratify patients so that access to care for deprived regions and patients is not lost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Translated article] Socioeconomic status, osteoporosis and fragility fractures

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures, as well as higher mortality in the first-year post-fracture. The SES variables that have the greatest impact are educational level, income level, and cohabitation status. Significant disparities exist among racial and ethnic minorities in access to osteoporosis screening and treatment. In Spain, a higher risk of fractures has been described in people with a low-income level, residence in rural areas during childhood and low educational level. The civil war cohort effect is a significant risk factor for hip fracture. There is significant geographic variability in hip fracture care, although the possible impact of socioeconomic factors has not been analyzed. It would be desirable to act on socioeconomic inequalities to improve the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Providing Guideline-Concordant Care After Hip Fracture Surgery

Importance

Institutions have adopted protocol-driven standardized hip fracture programs (SHFPs). However, concerns persist regarding bias in adherence to guideline-concordant care leading to disparities in implementing high-quality care for patients recovering from surgery for hip fracture.

Objective

To assess disparities in the implementation of guideline-concordant care for patients after hip fracture surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture (THF) Database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP THF database from 2016 to 2021 for patients aged 65 years and older with hip fractures undergoing surgical fixation. Care outcomes of racial and ethnic minority patients (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiple races and Hispanic ethnicity) were compared with non-Hispanic White patients via risk difference, stratified by care institution SHFP status. Modified Poisson regression was used to measure interactions. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes of interest encompassed weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) on postoperative day 1 (POD1), venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, bone-protective medication, and the presence of SHFP at the institution.

Results

Among 62 194 patients (mean [SD] age, 82.4 [7.3] years; 43 356 [69.7%] female) who met inclusion criteria and after multiple imputation, 11.2% (95% CI, 10.8%-11.5%) were racial and ethnic minority patients, 3.3% (95% CI, 3.1%-3.4%) were Hispanic patients, and 92.0% (95% CI, 91.7%-92.2%) were White. Receiving care at an institution with an SHFP was associated with improved likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care for all patients to varying degrees across care outcomes. SHFP was associated with higher probability of being WBAT-POD1 (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.030 [95% CI, 0.004-0.056]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.037 [95% CI, 0.029-0.45]) and being prescribed VTE prophylaxis (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.066 [95% CI, 0.040-0.093]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.080 [95% CI, 0.071-0.089]), but SHFP was associated with the largest improvements in receipt of bone-protective medications (risk difference for racial and ethnic minority patients, 0.149 [95% CI, 0.121-0.178]; risk difference for non-Hispanic White patients, 0.181 [95% CI, 0.173-0.190]). While receiving care at an SHFP was associated with improved probability of receiving guideline-concordant care in both race and ethnicity groups, greater improvements were seen among non-Hispanic White patients compared with racial and ethnic minority patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Older adults who received care at an institution with an SHFP were more likely to receive guideline-concordant care (bone-protective medication, WBAT-POD1, and VTE prophylaxis), regardless of race and ethnicity. However, the probability of receiving guideline-concordant care at an institution with an SHFP increased more for non-Hispanic White patients than racial and ethnic minority patients.

Persistent racial disparities in postoperative management after tibia fracture fixation: A matched analysis of US medicaid beneficiaries

INTRODUCTION

Racial and ethnic disparities in orthopaedic surgery are well documented. However, the extent to which these persist in fracture care is unknown. This study sought to assess racial disparities in the postoperative surgical and medical management of patients after diaphyseal tibia fracture fixation.

METHODS

Patients with surgically treated tibial shaft fractures from October 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, were identified in the MarketScan® Medicaid Database. Exclusion criteria included concurrent fractures or amputation. Outcomes included 2-year postoperative complications, reoperation rates, and filled prescriptions. Surgically-treated Black and White cohorts were propensity-score matched using nearest-neighbor matching on patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture pattern and severity, and fixation type. Chi-square tests and survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models) were conducted.

RESULTS

5,472 patients were included, 2,209 Black and 3,263 White patients. After matching, 2,209 were retained in each cohort. No significant differences in complication rates were observed in the matched Black vs White cohorts. Rates of reoperation, however, were significantly lower in Black as compared to White patients (28.5 % vs. 35.5 % rate, risk difference = 7.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 4.2 % to 9.7 %)). Implant removal was also significantly lower in Black (17.9 %) vs. White (25.1 %) patients (Risk difference = 7.2 %, (95 %CI: 4.8 % to 9.6 %)). The adjusted hazard ratio comparing the reoperation rate in Black versus White patients was 0.77 (95 %CI: 0.69-0.82, p < 0.0001). Significantly lower proportions of Black vs White patients filled at least one prescription for benzodiazepine, antidepressants, strong opiates, or antibiotics at every time point post-index.

DISCUSSION

Fewer resources were used in post-operative management after surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures for Black versus White Medicaid-insured patients. These results may be reflective of the undertreatment of complications after tibia fracture surgery for Black patients and highlight the need for further interventions to address racial disparities in trauma care.

Socioeconomic status, osteoporosis and fragility fractures

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures, as well as higher mortality in the first year post-fracture. The SES variables that have the greatest impact are educational level, income level, and cohabitation status. Significant disparities exist among racial and ethnic minorities in access to osteoporosis screening and treatment. In Spain, a higher risk of fractures has been described in people with a low income level, residence in rural areas during childhood and low educational level. The Civil War cohort effect is a significant risk factor for hip fracture. There is significant geographic variability in hip fracture care, although the possible impact of socioeconomic factors has not been analyzed. It would be desirable to act on socioeconomic inequalities to improve the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures.

Age-Based Heuristics Bias Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Background

Surgeons performing arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures may rely on mental shortcuts (heuristics) when choosing total hip arthroplasty (THA) vs hemiarthroplasty (HA). We sought to quantify the extent to which age-based heuristics drive decision-making.

Methods

We identified all Medicare beneficiaries from 2017-2018 with femoral neck fractures who underwent THA or HA. We compared the likelihood of THA vs HA among patients admitted within 4 weeks before vs 4 weeks after their birthday for each age under the hypothesis that these cohorts would be similar except for numerical age. We controlled for race/ethnicity, sex, comorbidities, poverty status, and hospital census region in a multivariable regression that included facility-level cluster effects. We generated predicted/adjusted probabilities for THA vs HA for different age transition points.

Results

Thirteen thousand three hundred sixty-six elderly patients were included. One thousand eight hundred sixty-five (14%) received THA and 11,501 (86%) received HA. The likelihood of THA decreased from 50.3% among patients almost 67 to 8% among those ≥85 (P < .001). We found significant decreases in likelihood of THA across age transitions. The largest decrement was at age transition 69 (THA likelihood 28.7% for newly 69 vs 43.3% for almost 69, 33.7% relative change). Female gender, Black race, higher comorbidity burden, and lower socioeconomic status were also associated with a lower likelihood of THA.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that patient age transitions seem to influence the choice of THA vs HA. Further research is needed to develop data-driven surgical decision aids for this population.

Risk Factors for 30-Day Complications and Unplanned Reoperation Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify demographic data, medical comorbidities, and perioperative factors that are associated with increased risk of overall surgical complications, wound complications, and reoperation within 30 days of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing ORIF of distal radius fractures in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2005 and 2020 were identified. Patients were excluded for secondary procedures, open/infected injuries, or inpatient surgical setting. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and perioperative data were examined for each patient, and patients were grouped by the presence or absence of any surgical complication. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 20 301 patients from between 2005 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria, of which 219 complications (1.1% of cases) were identified. Following multivariate analysis, independent risk factors found to be associated with surgical complications included male sex, smoking, heart failure, longer operative time, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, smoking, heart failure, prolonged operative time, and ASA status of 3 or higher are associated with an increased risk of surgical complications following ORIF of distal radius fractures. These complications, with the exception of heart failure, were also associated with an increased risk of wound complications. Finally, male sex, nonwhite race, smoking, dialysis, prolonged operative time, and 3 or higher ASA class were associated with reoperations. Understanding these risk factors allows surgeons to better predict and prevent complications in high-risk populations.

The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on clinical algorithms for fracture risk report

Using race and ethnicity in clinical algorithms potentially contributes to health inequities. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee convened the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to determine the impact of race and ethnicity adjustment in the US Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (US-FRAX). The Task Force engaged the University of Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Core to conduct a systematic review investigating the performance of US-FRAX for predicting incident fractures over 10 years in Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White individuals. Six studies from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) were eligible; cohorts only included women and were predominantly White (WHI > 80% and SOF > 99%), data were not consistently stratified by race and ethnicity, and when stratified there were far fewer fractures in Black and Hispanic women vs White women rendering area under the curve (AUC) estimates less stable. In the younger WHI cohort (n = 64 739), US-FRAX without bone mineral density (BMD) had limited discrimination for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (AUC 0.53 (Black), 0.57 (Hispanic), and 0.57 (White)); somewhat better discrimination for hip fracture in White women only (AUC 0.54 (Black), 0.53 (Hispanic), and 0.66 (White)). In a subset of the older WHI cohort (n = 23 918), US-FRAX without BMD overestimated MOF. The Task Force concluded that there is little justification for estimating fracture risk while incorporating race and ethnicity adjustments and recommends that fracture prediction models not include race or ethnicity adjustment but instead be population-based and reflective of US demographics, and inclusive of key clinical, behavioral, and social determinants (where applicable). Research cohorts should be representative vis-à-vis race, ethnicity, gender, and age. There should be standardized collection of race and ethnicity; collection of social determinants of health to investigate impact on fracture risk; and measurement of fracture rates and BMD in cohorts inclusive of those historically underrepresented in osteoporosis research.

AtoG: A simple score to predict complications and death after hip fractures, in line with the comprehensive geriatric assessment

INTRODUCTION

Proximal Femur Fractures (PFFs) are a significant public health issue and occur in the context of global frailty and aging. Recent literature identifies new patient-related prognostic factors that focus on socioeconomic environment, patient well-being, or nutrition status. Specific scores have been developed, but in most cases, they fail to be in line with the comprehensive geriatric assessment, or do not assess the newly identified prognostic factors, contain multitude collinearities, or are too complex to be used in the daily practice. Hypothesis A comprehensive score with equal representation of the patient's dimensions does at least as good as the Charlson score (CCI), to predict complications and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new comprehensive prognostic score, predicting inpatient complications and mortality up to 5-year after PFF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients treated surgically for PFF on a native hip, between 2005 and 2017 were selected from a French national database. The variables were the gender, age, the type of treatment (osteosynthesis or arthroplasty), and the CCI. The outcomes were the medical and surgical complications as inpatient and the mortality (up to 5-year). Variables were grouped into dimensions with similar clinical significance, using a Principal Component Analysis, for instance, bedsores and malnutrition. The dimensions were tested for 90-day mortality and complications, in regressions models. Two scores were derived from the coefficients: SCOREpond (strict ponderation), and SCORE (with loose ponderation: 1 point/risk factors, -1 point/protective factors). Calibration, discrimination (ROC curves with Area Under Curves AUC), and cross-validation were assessed for SCOREpond, SCORE, and CCI.

RESULTS

Analyses were performed on 7756 fractures. The factorial analysis identified seven dimensions: age; brain-related conditions (including dementia): 1738/7756; severe chronic conditions (for instance, organ failures) 914/7756; undernutrition: 764/7756; environment, including social issues or housing difficulties: 659/7756; associated trauma: 814/7756; and gender. The seven dimensions were selected for the prognostic score named AtoG (ABCDEFG, standing for Age, Brain, Comorbidities, unDernutrition, Environment, other Fractures, Gender). The median survival rate was 50.8 months 95% CI [49-53]. Anaemia and urologic complications were the most prevalent medical complications (1674/7756, 21%, and 1109/7756, 14.2%). A total of 149/7756 patients (1.9%) developed a mechanical inpatient complication (fractures or dislocations), with a slightly higher risk for arthroplasties. The AUCs were 0.69, 0.68, and 0.67 for AtoGpond, AtoG, and CCI, respectively, for 90-day mortality, and 0.64, 0.63, and 0.56 for complications. Compared to patients with AtoG=0, Hazard Ratios for 90-day mortality were 2.3 95% CI [1.7-2.9], 4.2 95% CI [3.1-5.4], 6 95% CI [4.5-8.1], 8.3 95% CI [6.5-12.9], and 13.7 95% CI [8-24], from AtoG=1 to AtoG≥5, respectively (p<10-4); the 90-day survival decreased by 5%/point, roughly. The sur-risk of mortality associated with AtoG was up to 5-year: HR=1.51 (95% CI [1.46-1.55], p<10-4). Compared to AtoG=0, from AtoG=1 to AtoG≥5, the pooled Odd Ratios were 1.14 95% CI [1.06-1.2], 1.53 95% CI [1.4-1.7], 2.17 95% CI [1.9-2.4], 2.9 95% CI [2.4-3.4], and 4.9 95% CI [3.3-7.4] for any complication (p<10-4).

CONCLUSION

AtoG is a multidimensional score in line with the concept of comprehensive geriatric assessment. It had good discrimination and performance in predicting 90-day mortality and complications. Performances were as good as CCI for 90-day mortality, and better than it for the complications.

LEVEL OF PROOF

IV; retrospective cohort study.

An Inclusive Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Orthopedic Surgery Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing attention, disparities in outcomes for Black and Hispanic patients undergoing orthopedic surgery are widening. In other racial-ethnic minority groups, outcomes often go unreported. We sought to quantify disparities in surgical outcomes among Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander patients across multiple orthopedic subspecialties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify all surgical procedures performed by an orthopedic surgeon from 2014 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the impact of race and ethnicity on 30-day medical complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality, while adjusting for orthopedic subspecialty and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Across 1,512,480 orthopedic procedures, all patients who were not White were less likely to have arthroplasty-related procedures (P<.001), and Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian or Alaskan Native patients were more likely to have trauma-related procedures (P<.001). American Indian or Alaskan Native (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.009; P=.011) and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (AOR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.005-1.014; P<.001) patients had higher odds of major medical complications compared with White patients. American Indian or Alaskan Native patients had higher risk of reoperation (AOR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.002-1.008; P=.002) and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander patients had higher odds of mortality (AOR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.000-1.005; P=.019) compared with White patients.

CONCLUSION

Disparities regarding surgical outcome and utilization rates persist across orthopedic surgery. American Indian or Alaskan Native and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander patients, who are under-represented in research, have lower rates of arthroplasty but higher odds of medical complication, reoperation, and mortality. This study highlights the importance of including these patients in orthopedic research to affect policy-related discussions. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):e131-e138.].

Are There Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Management and Outcomes of Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic disparities have been demonstrated across multiple orthopedic sub-specialties. There is a paucity of literature examining disparities in distal radius fracture (DRF) management.

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 15 559 non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, NH Asian, and Hispanic adults who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for DRF from 2013 to 2019. We evaluated time from hospital admission to surgery and length of stay using Poisson regression. Deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and wound complications were reported using descriptive statistics. Thirty-day reoperation and readmission were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Wait time to surgery was longer for Hispanic patients than NH White patients (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.54, P < .001); this narrowed over time (IRR: 0.944, P = .047). Length of stay was longer for NH Black (IRR: 1.78, P < .001) and Hispanic patients (IRR: 1.83, P < .001), but shorter for NH Asian (IRR: 0.715, P = .019) than NH White patients; this temporally narrowed for NH Black patients (IRR: 0.908, P = .001). Deep venous thrombosis, PE, and wound complications occurred at a rate less than 0.30% across all groups. Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo reoperation than NH White patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.254, P = .003). While there was no difference in readmission between groups in the aggregated study period, NH Black patients experienced a temporal increase in readmissions relative to NH White patients (OR: 1.40, P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in DRF management. Further investigation on causes for and solutions to combat these disparities in DRF care may help improve the inequities observed.

Mineralized collagen scaffolds for regenerative engineering applications

Collagen is a primary constituent of the tissue extracellular matrix. As a result, collagen has been a common component of tissue engineering biomaterials, including those to promote bone regeneration or to investigate cell-material interactions in the context of bone homeostasis or disease. This review summarizes key considerations regarding current state-of-the-art design and use of collagen biomaterials for these applications. We also describe strategic opportunities for collagen biomaterials to address a new era of challenges, including immunomodulation and appropriate consideration of sex and other patient characteristics in biomaterial design.

Social determinants of health disparities impact postoperative complications in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Understanding the role of social determinants of health disparities (SDHDs) in surgical outcomes can better prepare providers to improve postoperative care. In this study, we use International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify SDHDs and investigate the risk of postoperative complication rates among patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national insurance claims database. Using ICD and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients who underwent primary TSA with at least 2 years of follow-up in the database were identified. Patients with a history of SDHDs were identified using appropriate ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Patients were grouped in one of 2 cohorts: (1) patients with no history of SDHDs (control) and (2) patients with a history of SDHDs (SDHD group) prior to TSA. The SDHD and control groups were matched 1:1 for comorbidities and demographics prior to conducting multivariable analysis for 90-day medical complications and 2-year surgical complications.

RESULTS

After matching, there were 8023 patients in the SDHD group and 8023 patients in the control group. The SDHD group had significantly higher odds for 90-day medical complications including heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. Additionally, the SDHD group had significantly higher odds for revision surgery within 2 years following TSA. Patients in the SDHD group also had a significantly longer length of hospital stay following TSA.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the association between SDHDs and postoperative complications following TSA. Quantifying the risk of complications and differences in length of stay for TSA patients with a history of SDHDs is important in determining value-based payment models and risk stratifying to optimize patient care.

Association between anesthesia technique and death after hip fracture repair for patients with COVID-19

PURPOSE

Patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgeries have a 30-day mortality of up to 34%. We aimed to evaluate the association between anesthesia technique and 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

After ethics approval, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set from January to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 19 yr, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 14 days preoperatively, and hip fracture surgery under general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). Exclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status V, ventilator dependence, international normalized ratio ≥ 1.5, partial thromboplastin time > 35 sec, and platelet count < 80 × 109 L-1. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. The adjusted association between anesthetic technique and 30-day mortality was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 23,045 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, 331 patients met the study criteria. The median [interquartile range] age was 82 [74-88] yr, and 32.3% were male. The 30-day mortality rate was 10.0% (33/331) for the cohort (10.7%, 29/272 for GA vs 6.8%, 4/59 for SA; P = 0.51; standardized mean difference, 0.138). The use of SA, compared with GA, was not associated with decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 1.8; E-value, 2.49).

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia technique was not associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 undergoing hip fracture surgery. The findings were limited by a small sample size.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT05133648); registered 24 November 2021.

Racial Disparities in 30-day Readmission After Orthopaedic Surgery: A 5-year National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Readmission rate after surgery is an important outcome measure in revealing disparities. This study aimed to examine how 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission differ by race and specific injury areas within orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic procedures from 2015 to 2019. Patients were stratified by self-reported race. Procedures were stratified using current procedural terminology codes corresponding to given injury areas. Multiple logistic regression was done to evaluate associations between race and all-cause readmission risk, and risk of readmission due to specific causes.

RESULTS

Of 780,043 orthopaedic patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.18%. Black and Asian patients were at greater (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and lesser (OR = 0.76, P < 0.01) risk for readmission than White patients, respectively. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted for deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.25, P = 0.03), PE (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), or wound disruption (OR = 1.45, P < 0.01). For all races, all-cause readmission was highest after spine procedures and lowest after hand/wrist procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients were at greater risk for overall, spine, shoulder/elbow, hand/wrist, and hip/knee all-cause readmission. Asian patients were at lower risk for overall, spine, hand/wrist, and hip/knee surgery all-cause readmission. Our findings can identify complications that should be more carefully monitored in certain patient populations.

Clinical Presentation of Adults with Traumatic Orthopedic Injuries Enrolled in a Multisite Psychosocial Trial

Objectives

Traumatic orthopedic injuries are a top cause of hospital visits in the U.S. The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery (TOR) is a brief mind-body intervention that targets catastrophic thinking and pain anxiety following orthopedic injury. This study examines the baseline presentation of adults with traumatic orthopedic injuries who were enrolled in our recent multisite feasibility RCT of TOR versus usual care at four geographically distinct Level 1 trauma centers. We also examine whether patient presentation varies by site.

Methods

We recruited 181 adults (Mage=44.16, SD=16.5) from four Level I trauma centers located in the northeast (Site A; N=63), southwest (Site B; N=44), southeast (Site C; N=44), and southeast (Site D; N=30). At baseline, participants provided information about sociodemographic factors, pain and physical function, and physicians completed the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests were used to compare variables between sites.

Results

The majority of the sample (88.4%) sustained a fracture, and the mean AIS score was 2.31 (SD=0.55). Age, race, sex, gender, occupation, or marital status did not differ across sites (ps>.05). Over half (63%) of the sample was treated surgically, and 28.7% endorsed taking narcotic pain medications. More participants at Sites B (75%) and D (96.7%) received surgery than participants at Sites A (41%) and C (61.4%). More participants at Sites D and B reported narcotic usage than participants at Sites C and A. Participants at Site D demonstrated greater functional impairment than participants at the other sites.

Conclusion

Although sites were largely comparable, we did find key differences in surgical management, narcotic use, and functional disability which may have important implications for treatment response. This information will be used to iterate and refine TOR for a future multisite efficacy trial.

Hip Arthroscopy Utilization Disparities and Complications Amongst Ethnic Groups

While hip arthroscopy (HA) has increased in recent years, limited data exists regarding utilization and outcomes among racial groups. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent HA from 2006 to 2017. Patients were stratified into 6 self-reported racial/ethnic categories: White, African American, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, Native American, and Unknown. Major and minor complications in the 30-day post-operative period were identified. Data were available for 2230 patients who underwent HA. There were significant differences in the proportions of HA procedures when examining by race. White patients comprised 69% of the patient sample, African American patients 5.6%, Hispanic patients 3.9%, Asian patients 2.5%, Native American patients 0.7% and Unknown race/ethnicity patients 18.3% (P < .05). HA utilization increased significantly over time by all groups but remained low among ethnic minorities compared to the White cohort. Overall, major, and minor 30-day complication rates were 1.3%, 0.5%, and 0.9%, respectively. Although African American and Hispanic patients had higher overall complication rates than White patients, the differences were not statistically significant. Surgeons should be aware of the underutilization of HA among racial/ethnic minorities, and further studies evaluating insurance status and access to care are needed.

Medicare Eligibility and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Operative Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture

Importance

Medicare provides near-universal health insurance to US residents aged 65 years or older. How eligibility for Medicare coverage affects racial and ethnic disparities in operative management after orthopedic trauma is poorly understood.

Objective

To assess the association of Medicare eligibility with racial and ethnic disparities in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) after distal radius fracture (DRF).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study with a regression discontinuity design obtained data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project all-payer statewide databases for Florida, Maryland, and New York. These databases contain encounter-level data and unique patient identifiers for longitudinal follow-up across emergency departments, outpatient surgical centers, and hospitals. The cohort included patients aged 57 to 72 years who sustained DRFs between January 1, 2016, and November 30, 2019. Data analysis was performed between March 1 and October 15, 2023.

Exposure

Eligibility for Medicare coverage at age 65 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Type of management for DRF (closed treatment, external fixation, percutaneous pinning, and ORIF). Time to surgery was ascertained in patients undergoing ORIF. Multivariable logistic regression and regression discontinuity design were used to compare racial and ethnic disparities in patients who underwent ORIF before or after age 65 years.

Results

A total of 26 874 patients with DRF were included (mean [SD] age, 64.6 [4.6] years; 22 359 were females [83.2%]). Of these patients, 2805 were Hispanic or Latino (10.4%; hereafter, Hispanic), 1492 were non-Hispanic Black (5.6%; hereafter, Black), and 20 548 were non-Hispanic White (76.5%; hereafter, White) and 2029 (7.6%) were individuals of other races and ethnicities (including Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, and other races). Overall, 32.6% of patients received ORIF but significantly lower use was observed in Black (20.2% vs 35.4%; P < .001) and Hispanic (25.8% vs 35.4%; P < .001) patients compared with White individuals. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed the disparity in ORIF use in Black (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50-0.72) and Hispanic patients (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94) compared with White patients. No significant difference in ORIF use was found among racial and ethnic groups at age 65 years. The expected disparity in ORIF use between White and Black patients at age 65 years without Medicare coverage was 12.6 percentage points; however, the actual disparity was 22.0 percentage points, 9.4 percentage points (95% CI, 0.3-18.4 percentage points) greater than expected, a 75% increase (P = .04). In the absence of Medicare coverage, the expected disparity in ORIF use between White and Hispanic patients was 8.3 percentage points, and this result persisted without significant change in the presence of Medicare coverage.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study showed that surgical management for DRF was popular in adults aged 57 to 72 years, but there was lower ORIF use in racial or ethnic minority patients. Medicare eligibility at age 65 years did not attenuate race and ethnicity-based disparities in surgical management of DRFs.

Social determinants of health in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty: are they associated with medical complications, healthcare utilization, and payments for care?

INTRODUCTION

Social determinants of health (SDOH) have previously been shown to impact orthopedic surgery outcomes. This study assessed whether greater socioeconomic disadvantage in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fracture was associated with differences in (1) medical complications, (2) emergency department (ED) utilization, (3) readmission rates, and (4) payments for care.

METHODS

A US nationwide database was queried for hemiarthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of socioeconomic disadvantage reported on a scale of 0-100, was used to compare two cohorts of greater and lesser deprivation. Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty from high ADI (95% +) were 1:1 propensity score matched to a comparison group of lower ADI (0-94%) while controlling for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. This yielded 75,650 patients evenly distributed between the two cohorts. Outcomes studied were 90-day medical complications, ED utilizations, readmissions, and payments for care. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of the relationship between ADI and outcomes. p Values < 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

Patients of high ADI developed greater medical complications (46.74% vs. 44.97%; OR 1.05, p = 0.002), including surgical site infections (1.19% vs. 1.00%; OR 1.20, p = 0.011), cerebrovascular accidents (1.64% vs. 1.41%; OR 1.16, p = 0.012), and respiratory failures (2.27% vs. 2.02%; OR 1.13, p = 0.017) compared to patients from lower ADIs. Although comparable rates of ED visits (2.92% vs. 2.86%; OR 1.02, p = 0.579), patients from higher ADI were readmitted at diminished rates (10.57% vs. 11.06%; OR 0.95, p = 0.027). Payments were significantly higher on the day of surgery ($7,570 vs. $5,974, p < 0.0001), as well as within 90 days after surgery ($12,700 vs. $10,462, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients experience increased 90-day medical complications and payments, similar ED utilizations, and decreased readmissions. These findings can be used to inform healthcare providers to minimize disparities in care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Preoperative Optimization for Orthopaedic Surgery: Steps to Reduce Complications

As the population ages and patients maintain higher levels of activity, the incidence of major and minor orthopaedic procedures continues to rise. At the same time, health policies are incentivizing efforts to improve the quality and value of musculoskeletal health services. As such, orthopaedic surgeons play a key role in directing the optimization of patients before surgery by assessing patient risk factors to inform risk/benefit discussions during shared decision-making and designing optimization programs to address modifiable risks. These efforts can lead to improved health outcomes, reduced costs, and preference-congruent treatment decisions. In this review, we (1) summarize the evidence on factors known to affect outcomes after common orthopaedic procedures, (2) identify which factors are considered modifiable and amenable to preoperative intervention, and (3) provide guidance for preoperative optimization.

Evaluating the association between race and complications following pediatric upper extremity surgery

Race can influence perioperative care and outcomes in adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery. However, no prior study has evaluated any associations between race and complications following upper extremity surgery in pediatric patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there are any differences in risks for complications, readmission, or mortality following upper extremity surgery between African American and Caucasian pediatric patients. Pediatric patients who had a primary upper extremity procedure from 2012 to 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: patients who were Caucasian and patients who were African American. Differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between the two-patient population using bivariate and multivariable regression analyses. Of the 25 848 pediatric patients who underwent upper extremity surgeries, 21 693 (83.9%) were Caucasian, and 4155 (16.1%) were African American. Compared to Caucasian patients, African American patients were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ( P  < 0.001), as well as pulmonary comorbidities ( P  < 0.001) and hematologic disorders ( P  = 0.004). Following adjustment on multivariable regression analysis to control for baseline characteristics, there were no differences in any postoperative complications between Caucasian and African American patients. In conclusion, African American pediatric patients are not at an increased risk for postoperative complications compared to Caucasian patients following upper extremity surgery. Race should not be used independently when evaluating patient risk for postoperative complications. Level of Evidence: III.

Healthcare Market-Level and Hospital-Level Disparities in Access to and Utilization of High-Quality Hip and Knee Replacement Hospitals Among Medicare Beneficiaries

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine whether healthcare markets with higher social vulnerability have lower access to high-quality hip and knee replacement hospitals and whether hospitals that serve a higher percentage of low-income patients are less likely to be designated as high-quality.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services outcome measures and 2022 Joint Commission (JC) process-of-care measures to identify hospitals performing high-quality hip and knee replacement. A total of 2,682 hospitals and 304 healthcare markets were included. For the market-level analysis, we assessed the association of social vulnerability with the presence of a high-quality hip and knee replacement center. For the hospital-level analysis, we assessed the association of disproportionate share hospital (DSH) percentage with each high-quality designation. Healthcare markets were approximated by hospital referral regions. All associations were assessed with fractional regressions using generalized linear models with binomial family and logit links.

RESULTS

We found that healthcare markets in the most vulnerable quartile were less likely to have a hip and knee replacement hospital that did better than the national average (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, P = 0.02) but not more or less likely to have a hospital certified as advanced by JC (OR 0.41, P = 0.16). We found that hip and knee replacement hospitals in the highest DSH quartile were less likely to be designated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as better than the national average (OR 0.18, P = 0.001) but not more or less likely to be certified as advanced by JC (OR 1.40, P = 0.28).

DISCUSSION

Geographic distribution of high-quality hospitals may contribute to socioeconomic disparities in patients' access to and utilization of high-quality hip and knee replacement. Equal access to and utilization of hospitals with high-quality surgical processes does not necessarily indicate equitable access to and utilization of hospitals with high-quality outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Racial Disparities in the Operative Management of Orthopedic Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate if race is associated with the likelihood of operative management of acute fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies associated with social disparities and acute orthopedic trauma. Peer-reviewed studies commenting on social disparities and the decision to pursue operative or non-operative management of acute fractures were identified for detailed review. Study characteristics and odds ratios were extracted from each article. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A quality analysis of the data was also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies were identified and 8 were included in the meta-analysis totaling 743,846 fractures. Hip, distal radius, pelvic, tibial plateau, clavicle, femoral neck, and femoral shaft fractures were represented in this patient population. The meta-analysis demonstrated that White race is associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention compared to all other races pooled together (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.47; p < .0001) as well as Black race (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.72; p = .0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-White race and Black race are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving surgical management of acute orthopedic trauma. Surgeons and health systems should be aware of these inequities and consider strategies to mitigate bias and ensure all patients receive appropriate and timely care regardless of race.

Disparities in the Epidemiology and Management of Fragility Hip Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize the recently published scientific evidence on disparities in epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been a number of investigations focusing on the presence of disparities in the epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures. Race-, sex-, geographic-, socioeconomic-, and comorbidity-based disparities have been the primary focus of these investigations. Comparatively fewer studies have focused on why these disparities may exist and interventions to reduce disparities. There are widespread and profound disparities in the epidemiology and management of fragility hip fractures. More studies are needed to understand why these disparities exist and how they can be addressed.

Improving Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Driven by Increasing Utilization of Ambulatory Surgical Centers in New York State

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in disparities in utilization of hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) for outpatient ACDF (OP-ACDF) between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients from 2015 to 2018 in New York State.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Racial and ethnic disparities within the field of spine surgery have been thoroughly documented. To date, it remains unknown how these disparities have evolved in the outpatient setting alongside the rapid emergence of ASCs and whether restrictive patterns of access to these outpatient centers exist by race and ethnicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review from 2015 to 2018 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) New York State Ambulatory Database. Differences in utilization rates for OP-ACDF were assessed and trended over time by race and ethnicity for both HOPDs and freestanding ASCs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between utilization rates for OP-ACDF and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo OP-ACDF compared with White patients in New York State. However, the magnitude of these disparities lessened over time, as Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients had greater relative increases in utilization of HOPDs and ASCs for ACDF when compared with White patients ( Ptrend <0.001). The magnitude of the increase in freestanding ASC utilization was such that minority patients had higher ACDF utilization rates in freestanding ASCs by 2018 ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence of improving racial disparities in the relative utilization of outpatient ACDF in New York State. The increase in access to outpatient ACDF appeared to be driven by an increasing number of patients undergoing ACDF in freestanding ASCs in large metropolitan areas. These improving disparities are encouraging and contrast previously documented inequalities in inpatient spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

In-Hospital Mortality Risk and Discharge Disposition Following Hip Fractures: An Analysis of the Texas Trauma Registry

Background

In-hospital mortality and discharge disposition following traumatic hip fractures previously reported in the literature, has mainly focused on a nationwide scale, which may not be reflective of unique populations.

Objective

Our aim was to characterize demographics, hospital disposition, and associated outcomes for patients with the most common hip fractures.

Methods

A retrospective study utilizing the Trauma Registry from the Texas Department of State Health Services. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality, and discharge dispositions, were collected. The data were analyzed via univariate analysis and multivariate regressions.

Results

There were 17,104 included patients, composed of 45% femoral neck fractures (FN) and 55% intertrochanteric fractures (IT). There were no differences in injury severity score (ISS) (9 ± 1.8) or age (77.4 ± 8 years old) between fracture types. In-hospital mortality risk was low but different among fracture types (intertrochanteric, 1.9% vs femoral neck, 1.3%, P = .004). However, when controlling for age, and ISS, intertrochanteric fractures and Hispanic patients were associated with higher mortality (P < .001, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0). Uninsured, and Black/African American (P = .05, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) and Hispanic (P < .001, OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) patients were more likely to be discharged home after adjusting for age, ISS, and payment method.

Conclusion

Regardless of age, severity of the injury or admission hemodynamics, intertrochanteric fractures and Hispanic/Latino patients had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Patients who were uninsured, Hispanic, or Black were discharged home rather than to rehabilitation, regardless of age, ISS, or payment method.

The Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Morbidity and Mortality After Femoral Shaft Fractures

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize the case volume dependence of both facilities and surgeons on morbidity and mortality after femoral shaft fracture (FSF) fixation.

METHODS

Adults who had an open or closed FSF between 2011 and 2015 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Claims were identified by International Classification of Disease-9, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for a closed or open FSF and International Classification of Disease-9, Clinical Modification procedure codes for FSF fixation. Readmission, in-hospital mortality, and other adverse events were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for patient demographic and clinical factors. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the lowest and highest 20% to represent low-volume and high-volume surgeons/facilities.

RESULTS

Of 4,613 FSF patients identified, 2,824 patients were treated at a high or low-volume facility or by a high or low-volume surgeon. Most of the examined complications including readmission and in-hospital mortality showed no statistically significant differences. Low-volume facilities had a higher 1-month rate of pneumonia. Low-volume surgeons had a lower 3-month rate of pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

There is minimal difference in outcomes in relation to facility or surgeon case volume for FSF fixation. As a staple of orthopaedic trauma care, FSF fixation is a procedure that may not require specialized orthopaedic traumatologists at high-volume facilities.

Do Community-level Disadvantages Account for Racial Disparities in the Safety of Spine Surgery? A Large Database Study Based on Medicare Claims

BACKGROUND

Racial health disparities across orthopaedic surgery subspecialties, including spine surgery, are well established. However, the underlying causes of these disparities, particularly relating to social determinants of health, are not fully understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there a racial difference in 90-day mortality, readmission, and complication rates ("safety outcomes") among Medicare beneficiaries after spine surgery? (2) To what degree does the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a community-level marker of social determinants of health, account for racial disparities in safety outcomes?

METHODS

To examine racial differences in 90-day mortality, readmission, and complications after spine surgery, we retrospectively identified all 419,533 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older who underwent inpatient spine surgery from 2015 to 2019; we excluded 181,588 patients with endstage renal disease or Social Security disability insurance entitlements, who were on Medicare HMO, or who had missing SVI data. Because of the nearly universal coverage of those age 65 or older, Medicare data offer a large cohort that is broadly generalizable, provides improved precision for relatively rare safety outcomes, and is free of confounding from differential insurance access across races. The Master Beneficiary Summary File includes enrollees' self-reported race based on a restrictive list of mutually exclusive options. Even though this does not fully capture the entirety of racial diversity, it is self-reported by patients. Identification of spine surgery was based on five Diagnosis Related Groups labeled "cervical fusion," "fusion, except cervical," "anterior-posterior combined fusion," "complex fusion," and "back or neck, except fusion." Although heterogeneous, these cohorts do not reflect inherently different biology that would lead us to expect differences in safety outcomes by race. We report specific types of complications that did and did not involve readmission. Although complications vary in severity, we report them as composite measures while being cognizant of the inherent limitations of making inferences based on aggregate measures. The SVI was chosen as the mediating variable because it aggregates important social determinants of health and has been shown to be a marker of high risk of poor public health response to external stressors. Patients were categorized into three groups based on a ranking of the four SVI themes: socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status and language, and housing and transportation. We report the "average race effects" among Black patients compared with White patients using nearest-neighbor Mahalanobis matching by age, gender, comorbidities, and spine surgery type. Mahalanobis matching provided the best balance among propensity-type matching methods. Before matching, Black patients in Medicare undergoing spine surgery were disproportionately younger with more comorbidities and were less likely to undergo cervical fusion. To estimate the contribution of the SVI on racial disparities in safety outcomes, we report the average race effect between models with and without the addition of the four SVI themes.

RESULTS

After matching on age, gender, comorbidities, and spine surgery type, Black patients were on average more likely than White patients to be readmitted (difference of 1.5% [95% CI 0.9% to 2.1%]; p < 0.001) and have complications with (difference of 1.2% [95% CI 0.5% to 1.9%]; p = 0.002) or without readmission (difference of 3.6% [95% CI 2.9% to 4.3%]; p < 0.001). Adding the SVI to the model attenuated these differences, explaining 17% to 49% of the racial differences in safety, depending on the outcome. An observed higher rate of 90-day mortality among Black patients was explained entirely by matching using non-SVI patient demographics (difference of 0.00% [95% CI -0.3% to 0.3%]; p = 0.99). However, even after adjusting for the SVI, Black patients had more readmissions and complications.

CONCLUSION

Social disadvantage explains up to nearly 50% of the disparities in safety outcomes between Black and White Medicare patients after spine surgery. This argument highlights an important contribution of socioeconomic circumstances and societal barriers to achieving equal outcomes. But even after accounting for the SVI, there remained persistently unequal safety outcomes among Black patients compared with White patients, suggesting that other unmeasured factors contribute to the disparities. This is consistent with evidence documenting Black patients' disadvantages within a system of seemingly equal access and resources. Research on racial health disparities in orthopaedics should account for the SVI to avoid suggesting that race causes any observed differences in complications among patients when other factors related to social deprivation are more likely to be determinative. Focused social policies aiming to rectify structural disadvantages faced by disadvantaged communities may lead to a meaningful reduction in racial health disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

No Differences Between White and Non-White Patients in Terms of Care Quality Metrics, Complications, and Death After Hip Fracture Surgery When Standardized Care Pathways Are Used

BACKGROUND

Many initiatives by medical and public health communities at the national, state, and institutional level have been centered around understanding and analyzing critical determinants of population health with the goal of equitable and nondisparate care. In orthopaedic traumatology, several studies have demonstrated that race and socioeconomic status are associated with differences in care delivery and outcomes of patients with hip fractures. However, studies assessing the effectiveness of methods to address disparities in care delivery, quality metrics, and complications after hip fracture surgery are lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Are hospital quality measures (such as delay to surgery, major inpatient complications, intensive care unit admission, and discharge disposition) and outcomes (such as mortality during inpatient stay, within 30 days or within 1 year) similar between White and non-White patients at a single institution in the setting of a standardized hip fracture pathway? (2) What factors correlate with aforementioned hospital quality measures and outcomes under the standardized care pathway?

METHODS

In this retrospective, comparative study, we evaluated the records of 1824 patients 55 years of age or older with hip fractures from a low-energy mechanism who were treated at one of four hospitals in our urban academic healthcare system, which includes an orthopaedic tertiary care hospital, from the initiation of a standardized care pathway in October 2014 to March 2020. The standardized 4-day hip fracture pathway is comprised of medicine comanagement of all patients and delineated tasks for doctors, nursing, social work, care managers, and physical and occupational therapy from admission to expected discharge on postoperative day 4. Of the 1824 patients, 98% (1787 of 1824) of patients who had their race recorded in the electronic medical record chart (either by communicating it to a medical provider or by selecting their race from options including White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian in a patient portal of the electronic medical record) were potentially eligible. A total of 14% (249 of 1787) of patients were excluded because they did not have an in-state address. Of the included patients, 5% (70 of 1538) were lost to follow-up at 30 days and 22% (336 of 1538) were lost to follow-up at 1 year. Two groups were established by including all patients selecting White as primary race into the White cohort and all other patients in the non-White cohort. There were 1111 White patients who were 72% (801) female with mean age 82 ± 10 years and 427 non-White patients who were 64% (271) female with mean age 80 ± 11 years. Univariate chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests of demographics were used to compare White and non-White patients and find factors to control for potentially relevant confounding variables. Multivariable regression analyses were used to control for important baseline between-group differences to (1) determine the correlation of White and non-White race on mortality, inpatient complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and discharge disposition and (2) assess the correlation of gender, socioeconomic status, insurance payor, and the Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA) trauma risk score with these quality measures and outcomes.

RESULTS

After controlling for gender, insurer, socioeconomic status and STTGMA trauma risk score, we found that non-White patients had similar or improved care in terms of mortality and rates of delayed surgery, ICU admission, major complications, and discharge location in the setting of the standardized care pathway. Non-White race was not associated with inpatient (odds ratio 1.1 [95% CI 0.40 to 2.73]; p > 0.99), 30-day (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.48 to 1.83]; p > 0.99) or 1-year mortality (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.57 to 1.33]; p > 0.99). Non-White race was not associated with delay to surgery beyond 2 days (OR = 1.1 [95% CI 0.79 to 1.38]; p > 0.99). Non-White race was associated with less frequent ICU admissions (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.42 to 0.85]; p = 0.03) and fewer major complications (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.83]; p = 0.047). Non-White race was not associated with discharge to skilled nursing facility (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.78 to 1.30]; p > 0.99), acute rehabilitation facility (OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.66 to 1.41]; p > 0.99), or home (OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.68 to 1.29]; p > 0.99). Controlled factors other than White versus non-White race were associated with mortality, discharge location, ICU admission, and major complication rate. Notably, the STTGMA trauma risk score was correlated with all endpoints.

CONCLUSION

In the context of a hip fracture care pathway that reduces variability from time of presentation through discharge, no differences in mortality, time to surgery, complications, and discharge disposition rates were observed beween White and non-White patients after controlling for baseline differences including trauma risk score. The pathway detailed in this study is one iteration that the authors encourage surgeons to customize and trial at their institutions, with the goal of providing equitable care to patients with hip fractures and reducing healthcare disparities. Future investigations should aim to elucidate the impact of standardized trauma care pathways through the use of the STTGMA trauma risk score as a controlled confounder or randomized trials in comparing standardized to individualized, surgeon-specific care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with increased co-morbidity burden and independently associated with time to surgery, length of hospitalisation, and readmission rates of hip fracture patients

This study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes of hip fracture patients. Lower socioeconomic status is not only associated with poorer comorbidities but is also independently impacting surgical access and outcomes. This can be considered a "double setback" in the management of hip fractures.

PURPOSE

The effect of socioeconomic status on hip fracture outcomes remains controversial. We examine the relationship between SES and patient comorbidity, care access, and clinical outcomes of surgically managed hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Using healthcare payor status as a surrogate for SES, patients operated for fragility hip fractures between 2013 and 2016 were dichotomised based on payor status, namely private healthcare (PRIV) versus subsidised healthcare (SUB). PRIV patients were compared with SUB patients in terms of demographic data, ASA scores, co-morbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI), time to surgery, length of acute hospitalisation, and 90-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients in group PRIV and 1146 patients in group SUB were included. SUB patients had a higher mean Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) (p = 0.01), a longer length of hospitalisation (p = 0.001), an increased delay in surgery (p = 0.005), and higher 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.013). Lower SES (p = 0.01), older age (p = 0.01), higher CCI (p &lt; 0.01), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA) (p = 0.03) were predictive of time to surgery. Lower SES (p = 0.02) and higher CCI (p &lt; 0.001) were predictive of the length of hospitalisation. Lower SES (p = 0.04) and higher CCI (p &lt; 0.001) were predictive of 90-day readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Low SES is associated with higher CCI in surgically treated hip fracture patients. However, it is independently associated with slower access to surgery, a longer hospital stay, and higher readmission rates. Hence, lower SES, with its associated higher CCI and independent impact on surgical access and outcomes, can be considered a "double setback" in the management of fragility hip fractures.

Emerging Racial Disparities in Outpatient Utilization of Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities within the field of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been extensively reported. To date, however, it remains unknown how these disparities have translated to the outpatient TJA (OP-TJA) setting. The purposes of this study were to compare relative OP-TJA utilization rates between White and Black patients from 2011-2019 and assess how these differences in utilization have evolved over time.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review from 2011-2019 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Differences in the relative utilization of OP (same-day discharge) versus inpatient TJA between White and Black patients were assessed and trended over time. Multivariable logistic regressions were run to adjust for baseline patient factors and comorbidities.

RESULTS

During the study period, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo OP-TJA when compared to White patients (P < .001 for both outpatient total knee arthroplasty and outpatient total hip arthroplasty [OP-THA]). From 2011 to 2019, an emerging disparity was found in outpatient total knee arthroplasty and OP-THA utilization between White and Black patients (eg, White versus Black OP-THA: 0.4% versus 0.6% in 2011 compared with 10.2% versus 5.9% in 2019, P_trend < .001). These results held in all adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this study we found evidence of emerging and worsening racial disparities in the relative utilization of OP-TJA procedures between White and Black patients. These results highlight the need for early intervention by orthopaedic surgeons and policy makers alike to address these emerging inequalities in access to care before they become entrenched within our systems of orthopaedic care.

Association of Patient-Level and Hospital-Level Factors With Timely Fracture Care by Race

IMPORTANCE

Racial disparities in treatment benchmarks have been documented among older patients with hip fractures. However, these studies were limited to patient-level evaluations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether disparities in meeting fracture care time-to-surgery benchmarks exist at the patient level or at the hospital or institutional level using high-quality multicenter prospectively collected data; the study hypothesis was that disparities at the hospital-level reflecting structural health systems issues would be detected.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data in the PREP-IT (Program of Randomized trials to Evaluate Preoperative antiseptic skin solutions in orthopaedic Trauma) program from 23 sites throughout North America. The PREP-IT trials enrolled patients from 2018 to 2021, and patients were followed for 1-year. All patients with hip and femur fractures enrolled in the PREP-IT program were included in analysis. Data were analyzed April to September 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patient-level and hospital-level race, ethnicity, and insurance status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome measure was time to surgery based on 24-hour time-to-surgery benchmarks. Multilevel multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of race, ethnicity, and insurance status with time to surgery. The reported odds ratios (ORs) were per 10% change in insurance coverage or racial composition at the hospital level.

RESULTS

A total of 2565 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.5 (20.4) years (1129 [44.0%] men; mean [SD] body mass index, 27.3 [14.9]; 83 [3.2%] Asian, 343 [13.4%] Black, 2112 [82.3%] White, 28 [1.1%] other) were included in analysis. Of these patients, 834 (32.5%) were employed and 2367 (92.2%) had insurance; 1015 (39.6%) had sustained a femur fracture, with a mean (SD) injury severity score of 10.4 (5.8). Five hundred ninety-six patients (23.2%) did not meet the 24-hour time-to-operating-room benchmark. After controlling for patient-level characteristics, there was an independent association between missing the 24-hour benchmark and hospital population insurance coverage (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .005) and the interaction term between hospital population insurance coverage and racial composition (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .03). There was no association between patient race and delay beyond 24-hour benchmarks (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.29; P = .79).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, patients who sought care from an institution with a greater proportion of patients with racial or ethnic minority status or who were uninsured were more likely to experience delays greater than the 24-hour benchmarks regardless of the individual patient race; institutions that treat a less diverse patient population appeared to be more resilient to the mix of insurance status in their patient population and were more likely to meet time-to-surgery benchmarks, regardless of patient insurance status or population-based insurance mix. While it is unsurprising that increased delays were associated with underfunded institutions, the association between institutional-level racial disparity and surgical delays implies structural health systems bias.