Glenoid Dysplasia: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Posterior shoulder instability

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is defined by dynamic, recurrent and symptomatic partial or total loss of posterior joint contact. Anatomic risk factors comprise ligament hyperlaxity, glenoid retroversion or dysplasia, and high horizontal acromial morphology. Associated anatomic lesions comprise labrum lesions, posterior glenoid erosion and/or fracture, and anterior humeral head notching. We distinguish two subcategories of PSI: functional and structural, respectively without and with anatomic lesions. In both categories, there may be anatomic risk factors. Clinically, functional PSI involves reproducible asymptomatic voluntary subluxation or sometimes reproducible involuntary subluxation. Functional PSI implicates impaired external-rotation rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer muscle activity. Treatment is non-operative, by rehabilitation and shoulder pace maker. Structural shoulder instability involves anatomic lesions, often due to iterative microtrauma; pain is the most frequent symptom. It usually concerns young athletic subjects, but the clinical forms of structural and of anterior shoulder instability are not superimposable. Treatment may be surgical; arthroscopic labrum repair is effective in the absence of significant bone lesions, whereas otherwise posterior bone block is the treatment of choice. Surgical treatment of scapular features underlying structural PSI is improved by 3D preoperative planning, cutting guides and dedicated internal fixation systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: expert opinion.

Posterior Shoulder Instability, Part II-Glenoid Bone Grafting, Glenoid Osteotomy, and Rehabilitation/Return to Play-An International Expert Delphi Consensus Statement

PURPOSE

To establish consensus statements on glenoid bone grafting, glenoid osteotomy, rehabilitation, return to play, and follow-up for posterior shoulder instability.

METHODS

A consensus process on the treatment of posterior shoulder instability was conducted, with 71 shoulder/sports surgeons from 12 countries participating on the basis of their level of expertise in the field. Experts were assigned to 1 of 6 working groups defined by specific subtopics within posterior shoulder instability. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement.

RESULTS

All of the statements relating to rehabilitation, return to play, and follow-up achieved consensus. There was unanimous consensus that the following criteria should be considered: restoration of strength, range of motion, proprioception, and sport-specific skills, with a lack of symptoms. There is no minimum time point required to return to play. Collision athletes and military athletes may take longer to return because of their greater risk for recurrent instability, and more caution should be exercised in clearing them to return to play, with elite athletes potentially having different considerations in returning to play. The relative indications for revision surgery are symptomatic apprehension, multiple recurrent instability episodes, further intra-articular pathologies, hardware failure, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The study group achieved strong or unanimous consensus on 59% of statements. Unanimous consensus was reached regarding the criteria for return to play, collision/elite athletes having different considerations in return to play, indications for revision surgery, and imaging only required as routine for those with glenoid bone grafting/osteotomies at subsequent follow-ups. There was no consensus on optimal fixation method for a glenoid bone block, the relative indications for glenoid osteotomy, whether fluoroscopy is required or if the labrum should be concomitantly repaired.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Retrospective MRI analysis of 418 adult shoulder joints to assess the physiological morphology of the glenoid in a low-grade osteoarthritic population

BACKGROUND

Due to the difference in size between the humeral head and the glenoid, the shoulder joint is prone to instability. Therefore, the reconstruction of the physiological joint morphology is of great importance in shoulder joint preservation and replacement surgery. The aim of this study was to describe physiological reference parameters for the morphology of the glenoid for the first time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MRI images of the shoulder joints of 418 patients (mean age: 50.6 years [± 16.3]) were retrospectively analysed in a low-grade osteoarthritic population. The glenoid distance in coronal (GDc) and axial view (GDa), glenoid inclination (GI) and version (GV) as well as scapula neck length (SNL) were measured. Parameters were studied in association for age, gender, side and degeneration grade.

RESULTS

Mean GDc was 33.4 mm (± 3.6), mean GDa 26.8 mm (± 3.2), mean GI 10.5° (± 6.4), mean GV -0.4 mm (± 5.4) and mean SNL was 33.4 mm (± 4.7). GDa was significant higher in right shoulders (p < 0.001). GDc and GDa showed significant higher mean values in older patients (p < 0.001) and in shoulders with more severe degenerative changes (p < 0.05). While GDc, GDa and SNL were significant larger in male patients (p < 0.001), GI had a higher mean value in female shoulders (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Age, gender and shoulder joint degeneration influence changes in the morphological parameters of the glenoid. These findings have to be considered in shoulder diagnostics and surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Anterior Arthroscopic Approach for Multidirectional Shoulder Instability: Posterior Bone Block, Dynamic Anterior Stabilization, and Modified McLaughlin

Multidirectional shoulder instability represents an ongoing challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, and multiple techniques have been described to treat this condition. Posterior glenoid dysplasia is a known risk factor for posterior instability as well as persistent or recurrent instability following posterior stabilization procedures. Recurrent shoulder instability complicated by capsular insufficiency due to underlying soft tissue disorders or multiple prior failed surgical procedures poses a challenging surgical problem. A complex salvage surgery with multiple procedures is presented for patients with multidirectional instability or hyperlaxity, with an important posterior erosion component (mainly glenoid dysplasia) and loss of the anterior wall in previous surgical procedures to theoretically reduce recurrent dislocation rates. An anterior arthroscopic approach, including posterior bone block, dynamic anterior stabilization, and modified McLaughlin technique, is described in the present article.

Posterior Glenoid Bone Grafting in the Setting of Excessive Glenoid Retroversion Does Not Provide Adequate Stability in a Cadaveric Posterior Instability Model

BACKGROUND

Excessive glenoid retroversion is a known risk factor for posterior shoulder instability and failure after soft tissue stabilization procedures. Whether excessive glenoid retroversion is a risk factor for failure after posterior glenoid bone grafting is unknown.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical effectiveness of posterior iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) for posterior shoulder instability with increasing glenoid retroversion.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders had a posterior glenoid osteotomy allowing the glenoid retroversion to be set at 0°, 10°, and 20°. At these 3 preset angles, 4 conditions were simulated consecutively on the same specimen: (1) intact glenohumeral joint, (2) posterior Bankart lesion, (3) 20% posterior glenoid bone defect, and (4) posterior ICBG. Stability was evaluated in the jerk position (60° of glenohumeral anteflexion, 60° of internal rotation) by measuring (A) posterior humeral head (HH) translation (in mm) and (B) peak translational force (in N) necessary for translation of the HH over 25% of glenoid width.

RESULTS

At 0° of retroversion, the ICBG restored posterior HH translation and peak translational force to values comparable with those of the intact condition (P = .649 and P = .979, respectively). At 10° of retroversion, the ICBG restored the peak translational force to a value comparable with that of the intact condition (22.3 vs 24.7 N, respectively; P = .418) but showed a significant difference in posterior HH translation in comparison to the intact condition (4.5 vs 2.0 mm, respectively; P = .026). There was a significant increase in posterior HH translation and significant decrease in peak translational force with the ICBG at 20° of glenoid retroversion compared with the intact condition (posterior HH translation: 7.9 vs 2.0 mm, respectively; P < .006; peak translational force: 15.3 vs 24.7 N, respectively; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric study, posterior ICBG was able to restore stability to a level comparable to that of the native condition at 0° and to some extent at 10° of retroversion. However, posterior ICBG was not able to provide adequate stability at 20° of glenoid retroversion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Posterior glenoid bone grafting with ICBG should be used with caution when performed in isolation in the setting of posterior instability associated with glenoid bone loss and combined glenoid retroversion of >10°.

Glenoid morphology variation between patients with hypermobile shoulder joints and controls: Identification of hyperlaxity-related morphologic bone changes

Objective

Our study aims to quantitatively determine the concavity of the glenoid articular surface in patients with hypermobile shoulders compared to those without.

Method

We examined medical records of shoulder CTs from 2017 to 2022, selecting 50 patients with clinical signs of joint hypermobility for our case group and 54 for our control group. Two blinded readers independently assessed the glenoid morphology, calculating the glenoid concavity angle (GCA) and evaluating the articular surface shape as concave, flat, or convex. They also recorded the presence and severity of glenoid dysplasia. We compared these assessments between groups.

Results

The mean GCA was significantly lower in the hypermobile group (2.3 ± 3.7° and 2.3 ± 3.8°) versus controls (6.6 ± 3.3° and 5.3 ± 3.8°) (P < 0.05). Interobserver reproducibility was high (ICC=0.76). A stark difference in glenoid morphology was noted between groups (P < 0.001), with a majority of hypermobile patients having a flat or convex glenoid. GCAs decreased with increasing shoulder laxity and dysplasia. GCA showed 77-81 % sensitivity and 55-82 % specificity for detecting shoulder hyperlaxity with a 4° cutoff.

Conclusion

There is a significant association between GCA and shoulder hyperlaxity, demonstrating diagnostic efficacy and substantial interobserver agreement.

Clinical Relevance

GCA values lower than 4° warrant further clinical investigation for shoulder hyperlaxity and associated conditions, which is crucial for patient treatment planning.

Pediatric Shoulder Girdle

The pediatric shoulder girdle is a complex anatomical structure uniting the upper extremity and trunk. The osseous structures, their articulations, and the surrounding soft tissue support structures (muscles, tendons, and ligaments) allow for a wide range of motion at the shoulder. Growth and maturation of the components at the shoulder girdle vary, particularly the osseous structures. This characteristic renders interpretation of imaging of the pediatric shoulder girdle more challenging because normal or variant anatomy can be confused for pathology. We review the physiologic growth and maturation of the shoulder girdle with special emphasis on the development of the bones and their articulations. The role of various imaging modalities and the common osseous and soft tissue variants in the pediatric shoulder are also discussed.

Contemporary Management of the Upper Limb in Apert Syndrome: A Review

Background

Apert syndrome is a relatively rare genetic disorder with a constellation of distinct craniofacial deformities and bilateral syndactyly of the hands and feet. Although the literature contains ample evidence for the need to treat cranial, midfacial, and hand abnormalities, there are severe shortcomings in the literature when attempting to describe the pathology and management of the entire upper limb in patients with Apert syndrome.

Methods

A thorough literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, on the management of the upper extremity in Apert syndrome, including the shoulder, elbow, and hand.

Results

Our findings of the literature discuss the clinical presentation and management trends of the upper extremity in patients with Apert syndrome. Through multicenter collaboration, discussion among experts in the field, and evidence gathered from the literature, we propose treatment algorithms to treat deformities of the hand, shoulder, and elbow in patients with Apert syndrome.

Conclusions

This review identifies that even if hand pathologies have been correctly treated, shoulder and elbow abnormalities in patients with Apert syndrome are largely ignored. To optimize outcomes, added cognizance of additional upper limb congenital differences and their management should be highly advocated in this patient population.

A narrative review of little league shoulder: proximal humeral physis widening is only one piece of the puzzle, it is time to consider posterior glenoid dysplasia

Baseball athletes across all levels of play are at an increased risk for upper extremity injury due to the supraphysiologic demands on the shoulder and elbow during overhead throwing. Little league baseball players present with a unique subset of injuries that can affect the growth plate, commonly at the shoulder or the elbow. Ascertaining a diagnosis and plan of care for little league shoulder (LLS) historically focuses on the proximal humeral physis in skeletally immature throwing athletes presenting with shoulder pain. However, while not a current standard of care, posterior glenoid dysplasia is often present in youth baseball athletes presenting with LLS, warranting a shift in the way clinicians evaluate for and treat the youth baseball athlete's pathologic shoulder. Therefore, purpose of this narrative review is 2-fold: first, to describe the current standard of care as it relates to a diagnosis of LLS, and second, to critically describe a comprehensive evaluation process for youth throwing athletes with shoulder pain that includes screening for evidence of posterior glenoid dysplasia. This paper summarizes the current state of the available evidence for anatomic considerations of LLS in the baseball athletes throwing shoulder. Additionally, we provide a framework for clinical evaluation using a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the entire kinetic chain of the youth baseball athlete presenting with LLS and posterior glenoid dysplasia. A case study is presented to describe common presentations, clinical and objective examinations, and a plan of care from time of evaluation to return to throwing.

Posterior Shoulder Instability and Glenoid Bone Loss: A Review and a Free Bone Graft Technique

Posterior glenoid bone loss (pGBL) is frequently associated with posterior shoulder instability. Posterior glenohumeral instability accounts for a small percentage of shoulder pathologies, and critical bone loss in posterior instability has not been well defined in the literature. Younger patient populations who participate in activities that repetitively stress the posterior stabilizing structures of the shoulder are more prone to developing posterior shoulder instability. A variety of surgical options have been described, ranging from isolated capsulolabral repair to glenoid osteotomy. Soft-tissue repair alone may be an inadequate treatment in cases of pGBL and places patients at a high risk of recurrence. Our preferred technique for posterior glenoid reconstruction in cases of pGBL involves the transfer of a free iliac crest bone graft onto the native glenoid. The graft is contoured to fit the osseous defect and secured to provide an extension of the glenoid track. In this study, we review pGBL in the setting of posterior instability and describe our technique in detail. Further long-term studies are needed to refine the indications for glenoid bone graft procedures and quantify what constitutes a critical pGBL.

Arthroscopic Posterior Glenoid Osteotomy

Management of posterior shoulder instability in patients with excessive glenoid retroversion can be challenging. However, a corrective posterior glenoid osteotomy is an option. Although various open techniques are available, minimally invasive and arthroscopy surgery are the most advantageous. This study describes the feasibility and safety of an arthroscopic posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy using an autologous scapular spine graft along with additional posterior capsulolabral complex reattachment. This procedure is a viable option for patients with symptomatic posterior shoulder instability.

Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss and Instability: An Evidence-based Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Posterior glenohumeral instability is an underappreciated cause of disability that may necessitate surgical intervention to allow functional glenoid restoration. However, posterior glenoid bone abnormalities, when sufficiently severe, may contribute to persistent instability despite a well-performed capsulolabral repair. Recognition and understanding of these lesions is critical to both surgical decision making and execution of the surgical plan. Numerous procedures have been described to address posterior instability including recent developments in arthroscopic grafting techniques. The purpose of this article was to provide an evidence-based strategy for diagnosis and management of posterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss.

Dynamic pediatric shoulder instability: Etiology, pathogenesis and treatment

Dynamic shoulder instability in children or adolescents, whose glenohumeral growth plates are still open, is a rare condition with an etiology that is hard to decipher. Atraumatic and recurrent forms are most common, contrary to adults. Disruptions to capsule and ligament maturation, muscle balance or bone growth can lead to glenohumeral instability. The etiology assessment, which needs to be multidisciplinary in atraumatic forms, aims to collect the medical history, analyze the direction of the instability, determine whether it is voluntary or involuntary, and look for a history of trauma, connective tissue abnormality, psychological disorder, neuromuscular pathology or congenital malformation. The initial treatment is conservative. It requires a multidisciplinary team when the shoulder instability is voluntary. Surgical treatment is reserved for symptomatic forms that do not respond to conservative treatment and have an impact on daily life and/or sports participation after a minimum of 6 months of well-conducted rehabilitation. The results of surgical stabilization mainly depend on the features of the instability, the anatomical structures damaged and the etiology. Episodes of recurrent instability in children/adolescents with open glenohumeral growth plates can fade in adulthood or can get worse with the development of structural damage. Early detection of poor outcomes and suitable treatment will help to limit the occurrence of osteoarthritis in the medium and long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert opinion.

Features of reverse arthroplasty of the shoulder joint in orthopedic pathology of the glenoid (literature review)

The reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the conditions of the modified anatomy of the glenoid is complex and often excludes the possibility of using the standard tactics of installing the glenoid component. There are no identical glenoids, each articular cavity of the scapula differs in height, width, angle of inclination, density of bone tissue, absence or presence of various defects of bone tissue. Given the variety of options for changing the structure and quality of the glenoid bone tissue in injuries and diseases of the shoulder joint, each case of endoprosthetics should be considered individually. In order to perform an adequate metaglen installation, these parameters must be normalized or standardized. The purpose of this work is to review the domestic and foreign literature devoted to the features of reversible shoulder joint replacement during deformation of the articular cavity of the scapula. Based on the analysis of literature data, the percentage of complications associated with unsatisfactory treatment results due to the instability of the glenosphere is quite large, which indicates the lack of elaboration of this topic and its relevance for practical traumatology and orthopedics. The paper considers eccentric non-standard methods of rimming the articular cavity of the scapula, methods of its bone grafting, the use of metaglens made taking into account the deformation of the glenoid, as well as indications for the use of technology for the individual manufacture of scapular components. The study and analysis of indications for the use of various types of techniques for solution glenoid deformities made it possible to systematize and differentially approach the issue of preoperative planning and choosing the correct, right treatment tactics in complex cases of reversible shoulder joint replacement.

Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Open-Wedge Osteotomy and Glenoid Concavity Reconstruction Using an Implant-Free, J-Shaped Iliac Crest Bone Graft

BACKGROUND

Posterior open-wedge osteotomy and glenoid reconstruction using a J-shaped iliac crest bone graft showed promising clinical results for the treatment of posterior instability with excessive glenoid retroversion and posteroinferior glenoid deficiency.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical performance of the posterior J-shaped graft to restore glenoid retroversion and posteroinferior deficiency in a cadaveric shoulder instability model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A posterior glenoid open-wedge osteotomy was performed in 6 fresh-frozen shoulders, allowing the glenoid retroversion to be set at 0°, 10°, and 20°. At each of these 3 preset angles of glenoid retroversion, the following conditions were simulated: (1) intact joint, (2) posterior Bankart lesion, (3) 20% posteroinferior glenoid deficiency, and (4) posterior J-shaped graft (at 0° of retroversion). With the humerus in the Jerk position (60° of glenohumeral anteflexion, 60° of internal rotation), stability was evaluated by measuring posterior humeral head (HH) translation (in mm) and peak translational force (in N) to translate the HH over 25% of the glenoid width. Glenohumeral contact patterns were measured using pressure-sensitive sensors. Fixation of the posterior J-graft was analyzed by recording graft micromovements during 3000 cycles of 5-mm anteroposterior HH translations.

RESULTS

Reconstructing the glenoid with a posterior J-graft to 0° of retroversion significantly increased stability compared with a posterior Bankart lesion and posteroinferior glenoid deficiency in all 3 preset degrees of retroversion (P < .05). There was no significant difference in joint stability comparing the posterior J-graft with an intact joint at 0° of retroversion. The posterior J-graft restored mean contact area and contact pressure comparable with that of the intact condition with 0° of retroversion (222 vs 223 mm2, P = .980; and 0.450 vs 0.550 MPa, P = .203). The mean total graft displacement after 3000 cycles of loading was 43 ± 84 µm, and the mean maximal mediolateral graft bending was 508 ± 488 µm.

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical analysis of the posterior J-graft demonstrated reliable restoration of initial glenohumeral joint stability, normalization of contact patterns comparable with that of an intact shoulder joint with neutral retroversion, and secure initial graft fixation in the cadaveric model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study confirms that the posterior J-graft can restore stability and glenohumeral loading conditions comparable with those of an intact shoulder.

The Thumb Test: A Simple Physical Examination Maneuver for the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Posterior Shoulder Instability

Posterior shoulder instability is becoming increasingly recognized in young active patient populations. Diagnosing posterior instability can be challenging because patients commonly present with a complaint of pain without a history of a dislocation or subluxation event. Additionally, a posterior labral tear is not always clearly visualized on advanced imaging studies. As such, physical examination is critical to the diagnosis. We report a simple physical examination maneuver for the diagnosis of symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. The thumb test attempts to replicate a posterior bone block procedure, helping to re-establish stability and relieve pain. The examiner places his or her thumb over the posterior glenohumeral joint line while the patient actively forward elevates the affected arm overhead. Improvement in pain and stability with this maneuver is diagnostic for symptomatic posterior shoulder instability. This test augments current physical examination maneuvers to assist with correctly diagnosing posterior shoulder instability.

The Effect of Glenoid Version on Glenohumeral Instability

In recent years, an appreciation for the dynamic relationship between glenoid and humeral-sided bone loss and its importance to the pathomechanics of glenohumeral instability has substantially affected modern treatment algorithms. However, comparatively less attention has been paid to the influence of glenoid version on glenohumeral instability. Limited biomechanical data suggest that alterations in glenoid version may affect the forces necessary to destabilize the glenohumeral joint. However, this phenomenon has not been consistently corroborated by the results of clinical studies. Although increased glenoid retroversion may represent an independent risk factor for posterior glenohumeral instability, this relationship has not been reliably observed in the setting of anterior glenohumeral instability. Similarly, the effect of glenoid version on the failure rates of surgical stabilization procedures remains poorly understood.

Comprehensive management of posterior shoulder instability: diagnosis, indications, and technique for arthroscopic bone block augmentation

Recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is an entity that demands a high clinical suspicion and a detailed study for a correct approach and treatment. Its classification must consider its biomechanics, whether it is due to functional muscular imbalance or to structural changes, volition, and intentionality.

Due to its varied clinical presentations and different structural alterations, ranging from capsule-labral lesions and bone defects to glenoid dysplasia and retroversion, the different treatment alternatives available have historically had a high incidence of failure.

A detailed radiographic assessment, with both CT and MRI, with a precise assessment of glenoid and humeral bone defects and of glenoid morphology, is mandatory.

Physiotherapy focused on periscapular muscle reeducation and external rotator strengthening is always the first line of treatment. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment must be guided by the structural lesions present, ranging from soft tissue repair to posterior bone block techniques to restore or increase the articular surface.

Bone block procedures are indicated in cases of recurrent posterior instability after the failure of conservative treatment or soft tissue techniques, as well as symptomatic demonstrable nonintentional instability, presence of a posterior glenoid defect >10%, increased glenoid retroversion between 10 and 25°, and posterior rim dysplasia. Bone block fixation techniques that avoid screws and metal allow for satisfactory initial clinical results in a safe and reproducible way.

An algorithm for the approach and treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is presented, as well as the author’s preferred surgical technique for arthroscopic posterior bone block.

Shoulder Osteoarthritis

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis has proven to be a major contributor to shoulder joint pain and dysfunction in the elderly. There are several conditions about the shoulder that contribute to the development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, which includes traumatic injuries, rotator cuff pathology, glenohumeral instability, glenoid dysplasia, and osteonecrosis. When glenohumeral osteoarthritis pain is refractory to conservative treatment, intra-articular injections and surgery can be performed. The radiologist should be aware of the varying types of shoulder arthroplasties, what preoperative findings influence that decision and the expected postoperative appearance of the differing components.

Long-term results after posterior open glenoid wedge osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability associated with excessive glenoid retroversion

BACKGROUND

Treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) associated with excessive glenoid retroversion is a rare, challenging problem in shoulder surgery. One proposed technique is posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy to correct excessive glenoid retroversion as described by Scott. However, this operation is rarely performed, and limited long-term outcomes using this approach are available. The goal of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion.

METHODS

Six consecutive patients (7 shoulders) with a mean age of 24 years (range 19-34) were treated with posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with a glenoid retroversion greater than 15° and followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean age of 15 years (range 10-19).

RESULTS

Recurrent, symptomatic PSI was observed in 6 of 7 shoulders (86%). One necessitated revision with a posterior (iliac crest) bone block procedure and was rated as a failure and excluded from functional analysis. One patient rated his result as excellent, 3 as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as unsatisfactory. Mean relative Constant Score (CS%) was unchanged from preoperation to final follow-up (CS% = 72%) and pain did not significantly decrease (Constant Score = 7-10 points; P = .969). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) improved postoperatively, but with 6 patients the improvement did not reach statistical significance (SSV = 42%-67%, P = .053) and the total Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index averaged 30% at the final follow-up. Mean glenoid retroversion of all 7 shoulders was corrected from 20° (range 16°-26°) to 3° (range -3° to +8°) (P = .018). In the 5 shoulders with preoperative static posterior subluxation of the humeral head, the humeral head was not recentered. All 7 shoulders showed progression of glenoid arthritic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion neither reliably restored shoulder stability nor recentered the joint or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. Alternative treatments for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion have to be developed and evaluated.

High Incidence of Anterior Shoulder Pain in Young Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to determine the incidence of anterior shoulder pain in young athletes undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability and in patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain treated without biceps tenodesis at the time of arthroscopic posterior labral repair who underwent a revision biceps tenodesis procedure at short-term follow up.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed at a single institution over a 24-month period. The study included young patients who underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. The electronic medical record, magnetic resonance arthrograms, and arthroscopic images were reviewed to exclude patients with posterior labral tears with anterior labral tear or SLAP (superior labrum anterior-to-posterior) tear extension on advanced imaging and arthroscopic examination. Data collected included the presence of preoperative tenderness to palpation of the biceps tendon in the groove, the results of a preoperative Speed test, postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value, the presence of postoperative anterior shoulder pain, and the need for a secondary biceps tenodesis.

Results

We identified 65 patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair for posterior shoulder instability. From this cohort, 26 patients with symptomatic unidirectional posterior shoulder instability underwent an arthroscopic posterior labral repair. The incidence of preoperative anterior shoulder pain with Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness and a positive Speed test was identified in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Of 26 patients, 5 (19%) had concomitant biceps tenodesis. The median postoperative Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (interquartile range, 60-90) at median follow-up of 2.1 years. Of the 20 patients with preoperative anterior shoulder pain, 8 of 20 (40%) reported persistent anterior pain. One patient (4.7%) underwent a secondary biceps tenodesis.

Conclusions

There is a high incidence of anterior shoulder pain and Zone 2 biceps groove tenderness in patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic posterior labral repair for unidirectional posterior shoulder instability. At short-term follow-up, few patients required a secondary biceps tenodesis procedure; however, 30% of patients had persistent anterior shoulder pain.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective diagnostic case series.

Posterior Open-wedge Osteotomy and Glenoid Concavity Reconstruction Using an Implant-free, J-shaped Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Atraumatic Posterior Instability with Pathologic Glenoid Retroversion and Dysplasia: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

Atraumatic posterior shoulder instability in patients with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia is an unsolved problem in shoulder surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a preliminary study of a small group of patients with atraumatic posterior shoulder instability associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and glenoid dysplasia who underwent posterior open-wedge osteotomy and glenoid concavity reconstruction using an implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone graft, we asked: (1) What proportion of the patients had persistent apprehension? (2) What were the improvements in patient-reported shoulder scores? (3) What were the radiographic findings at short-term follow-up?

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, we treated seven patients for atraumatic posterior shoulder instability. We performed this intervention when posterior shoulder instability symptoms were unresponsive to physiotherapy for at least 6 months and when it was associated with glenoid retroversion ≥ 15° and dysplasia of the posteroinferior glenoid. All seven patients had a follow-up examination at a minimum of 2 years. The median (range) age at surgery was 27 years (16 to 45) and the median follow-up was 2.3 years (2 to 3). Apprehension was assessed by a positive posterior apprehension and/or posterior jerk test. Patient-reported shoulder scores were obtained and included the subjective shoulder value, obtained by chart review (and scored with 100% representing a normal shoulder; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 12%), and the Constant pain scale score (with 15 points representing no pain; MCID 1.5 points). Radiographic measurements included glenohumeral arthropathy and posterior humeral head subluxation, bone graft union, correction of glenoid retroversion and glenoid concavity depth, as well as augmentation of glenoid surface area. All endpoints were assessed by individuals not involved in patient care.

RESULTS

In four of seven patients, posterior apprehension was positive, but none reported resubluxation. The preoperative subjective shoulder value (median [range] 40% [30% to 80%]) and Constant pain scale score (median 7 points [3 to 13]) were improved at latest follow-up (median subjective shoulder value 90% [70% to 100%]; p = 0.02; median Constant pain scale score 15 points [10 to 15]; p = 0.03). Posterior glenoid cartilage erosion was present in four patients (all four had Walch Type B1 glenoids) preoperatively and showed no progression until the final follow-up examination. The median (range) humeral head subluxation index decreased from 69% (54% to 85%) preoperatively to 55% (46% to 67%) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and in two of four patients with preoperative humeral head subluxation (> 65% subluxation), it was reversed to a centered humeral head. CT images showed union in all implant-free, J-shaped iliac crest bone grafts. The median preoperative retroversion was corrected from 16° (15° to 25°) to 0° postoperatively (-5° to 6°; p = 0.02), the median glenoid concavity depth was reconstructed from 0.3 mm (-0.7 to 1.6) preoperatively to 1.2 mm (1.1 to 3.1) postoperatively (p = 0.02), and the median preoperative glenoid surface area was increased by 20% (p = 0.02). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded, and no reoperation was performed or is planned.

CONCLUSION

In this small, retrospective series of patients treated by experienced shoulder surgeons, a posterior J-bone graft procedure was able to reconstruct posterior glenoid morphology, correct glenoid retroversion, and improve posterior shoulder instability associated with pathologic glenoid retroversion and dysplasia, although four of seven patients had persistent posterior apprehension. Although no patients in this small series experienced complications, the size and complexity of this procedure make it likely that as more patients have it, some will develop complications; future studies will need to characterize the frequency and severity of those complications, and we recommend that this procedure be done only by experienced shoulder surgeons. The early results in these seven patients justify further study of this procedure for the proposed indication, but longer term follow-up is necessary to continue to assess whether it is advantageous to combine the reconstruction of posterior glenoid concavity with correction of pathological glenoid retroversion and increasing glenoid surface compared with traditional surgical techniques such as the posterior opening wedge osteotomy or simple posterior bone block procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Early to midterm outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on dysplastic glenoids

BACKGROUND

Treatment of primary osteoarthritis with glenoid dysplasia or Walch type C glenoids remains controversial. There is scant literature available on patient outcomes after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in patients with Walch type C glenoids. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for Walch type C dysplastic glenoids with standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components compared with TSA for glenoids with concentric wear and minimal erosion (Walch type A1). We hypothesized that TSA performed for Walch type C dysplastic glenoids with standard glenoid components can reliably produce successful results at short- to midterm follow-up.

METHODS

We identified all patients who had primary anatomic TSA performed for osteoarthritis in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry collected from 2004 to the present time. Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria of a preoperative Walch type C dysplastic glenoid, treatment with TSA using standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components, and a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up. A matched cohort of 58 patients with a type A1 glenoid and minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty served as the control group. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), patient satisfaction, complications, and revisions were evaluated in both cohorts.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up for this study was 4.5 years (standard deviation, 2.6 years; range, 2-10 years). Baseline measures were not significantly different between the Walch type C dysplastic group and the matched type A1 cohort (all P > .05). Both groups showed significant improvements in ASES, ASES pain, and SANE scores from baseline to the final follow-up (all P < .001). The Walch type C group had no significant differences in ASES score (P = .118), ASES pain (P = .730), or SANE score (P = .168) compared with the matched type A1 cohort. The complication rate of patients with a type C glenoid was 14% (4 of 29) with a 7% (2 of 29) revision rate. Similarly, the complication rate for the A1 matched cohort was 17% (10 of 58) with a 12% (7 of 58) revision rate. Both groups had high patient satisfaction without statistical differences (P = .549). In addition, there were no differences in the rate of radiographic lucencies or Lazarus scores (P = .222).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic TSA reliably produced clinically significant improvements in pain and function and similar short- to midterm outcomes in patients with Walch type C dysplastic glenoids compared with patients with type A1 glenoids. Anatomic TSA with standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components should remain an option in patients with Walch type C dysplastic glenoids despite emerging treatment options including augmented glenoid components and reverse TSA.

[Shoulder instability: review of current concepts of diagnosis and treatment]

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of modern literature data on the modern approaches in diagnosis and treatment of shoulder instability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Searching for literature data was performed using the Pubmed and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed the results of conservative treatment of patients with shoulder instability and emphasized higher risk of instability recurrence, degeneration of anatomical structures and functional impairment in these patients. Surgery is advisable to restore shoulder stability and normalize its function. Several methods for stabilizing the shoulder have been proposed.

The approaches to diagnosis and treatment of shoulder instability have been updated.

CONCLUSION

Successful treatment of shoulder instability is based on qualitative and complete assessment of soft tissues and bone structures. An individual approach considering bone tissue deficiency and individual needs of the patient is required.

Recurrent posterior shoulder instability starting in childhood and adolescence

Aims

We aimed to address the question on whether there is a place for shoulder stabilization surgery in patients who had voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood and adolescence, and later becoming involuntary and uncontrollable.

Methods

Consecutive patients who had an operation for recurrent posterior instability before the age of 18 years were studied retrospectively. All patients had failed conservative treatment for at least six months prior to surgery; and no patients had psychiatric disorders. Two groups were identified and compared: voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood which became uncontrollable and involuntary (group VBI); and involuntary posterior instability (group I). Patients were reviewed and assessed at least two years after surgery by two examiners.

Results

In all 38 patients (40 shoulders) were included: group I (20 shoulders), with involuntary posterior instability (onset at 14 years of age (SD 2.3), and group VBI (20 shoulders), with initially voluntary posterior instability (onset at 9 years of age (SD 2.6) later becoming involuntary (16 years of age (SD 3.5). Mean age at surgery was 20 years (SD 4.6 years; 12 to 35). A posterior bone block was performed in 18 patients and a posterior capsular shift in 22. The mean follow-up was 7.7 years (2 to 18). Recurrence of posterior instability was seen in nine patients, 30% in group VBI (6/20 shoulders) and 15% in group I (3/20 shoulders) (p > 0.050). At final follow-up, the shoulder's of two patients in each group had been revised. No differences between either group were found for functional outcomes, return to sport, subjective, and radiological results.

Conclusion

Although achieving stability in patients with so-called voluntary instability, which evolves into an involuntary condition, is difficult, shoulder stabilization may be undertaken with similar outcomes to those patients treated surgically for involuntary instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1760–1766.

Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of disability throughout the world. Current therapeutic strategies are aimed at preventing the development and delaying the progression of OA, as well as repairing or replacing worn articular surfaces, because the regeneration of lost hyaline articular cartilage is not currently a clinically feasible option. Imaging is useful in formulating treatment strategies in patients at risk for OA, allowing assessment of risk factors, the degree of preexisting tissue damage, and posttreatment monitoring. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in particular, provides in-depth evaluation of these patients, with optimal clinical sequencing allowing sensitive assessment of chondral signal and morphology, and the addition of advanced MRI techniques facilitating comprehensive evaluation of joint health, with increased sensitivity for changes in articular cartilage and surrounding joint tissues.

Editorial Commentary: To Boldy Go…to the Back of the Glenoid: Bone is the Key to Success

Risk factors of failure after arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization are not well understood. Careful attention to anatomy may be the key to helping patients understand their risk of failure after surgery. Posterior stabilization may be even more sensitive to small amounts of bone loss than is anterior stabilization.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates With Computed Tomography for Glenoid Version Calculation Despite Lack of Visibility of Medial Scapula

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of measuring glenoid version on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the presence of varying amounts of the medial scapula body as compared with the gold standard of glenoid version measured on computed tomography (CT) imaging, including the entire scapula in a cohort of young patients with shoulder instability and without glenohumeral arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on instability patients with preoperative MRI and CT imaging. Measurements of available scapular width and glenoid version were performed using the Cobb angle method to measure the angle between the plane of the glenoid fossa to Friedman's line on axial images. Intra- and interrater reliability analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficients to assess agreement between MRI and CT measurements. Paired t tests were used to compare measurement differences between MRI and CT.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with both MRI and CT scans were assessed. Intra- and inter-rater assessment revealed strong agreement for scapular width measurement. For glenoid version measurement, intra-rater agreement was excellent and inter-rater agreement was moderate on CT and good on MRI. The mean available scapular body width was 24.7 mm longer on CT as compared with MRI (95% confidence interval 17.5-31.9, P < .0001; 109.8 ± 8.2 mm vs 85.1 ± 16.9 mm, respectively), with MRI having an average of 78.2% (±17.6%) of the CT scapular width shown on CT. No significant difference in glenoid version was found between MRI and CT (95% confidence interval -0.87 to 1.75, P = .499; MRI -2.57° vs CT -2.13°).

CONCLUSION

MRI provided significantly shorter available scapular widths when compared with CT imaging in a cohort of patients with glenohumeral instability and without arthritis. However, this failed to produce a significant difference of ≥5° in measured glenoid version compared with CT measurements when 75% (8 cm) of the scapular width was present on MRI. Measuring glenoid version on MRI does not appear to be significantly affected when the entirety of the medial border of the scapula is not included in the imaging field.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; study of diagnostic test.

The long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma

Aims

The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a bone sarcoma.

Methods

A total of 35 consecutive patients treated with extendable endoprosthetic replacement of the humerus in children were included. There were 17 boys and 18 girls in the series with a median age at the time of initial surgery of nine years (interquartile range (IQR) 7 to 11).

Results

The median follow-up time was 10.6 years (IQR 3.9 to 20.4). The overall implant survival at ten years was 75%. Complications occurred in 13 patients (37%). Subluxation at the proximal humerus occurred in 19 patients (54%) but only six (17%) were symptomatic. Subluxation was seen more commonly in children under the age of nine years (86%) than in those aged nine years or more (33%) (p = 0.002). Implant failure occurred in nine patients (26%): the most common cause was aseptic loosening (four patients, 11%). Lengthening of the implant was carried out in 23 patients (66%). At final follow up, three patients had a limb that was shortened by 5 cm or more. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score was 79% (73% to 90%).

Conclusion

Extendable endoprosthetic replacement is a reliable method of reconstructing humerus after excision of a bone sarcoma. Children who are less than nine years old have a high risk of subluxation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):64–71

Glenoid retroversion is an important factor for humeral head centration and the biomechanics of posterior shoulder stability

PURPOSE

Glenoid retroversion is a known independent risk factor for recurrent posterior instability. The purpose was to investigate progressive angles of glenoid retroversion and their influence on humeral head centration and posterior translation with intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum in a cadaveric human shoulder model.

METHODS

A total of 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were investigated for this study. After CT- canning, the glenoids were aligned parallel to the floor, with the capsule intact, and the humerus was fixed in 60° of abduction and neutral rotation. Version of the glenoid was created after wedge resection from posterior and fixed with an external fixator throughout the testing. Specimens underwent three conditions: intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum, while version of the glenoid was set from + 5° anteversion to - 25° retroversion by 5° increments. Within the biomechanical setup, the glenohumeral joint was axially loaded (22 N) to center the joint. At 0° of glenoid version and intact labrum, the initial position was used as baseline and served as point zero of centerization. After cyclic preloading, posterior translation force (20 N) was then applied by a material testing machine, while start and endpoints of the scapula placed on an X-Y table were measured.

RESULTS

The decentralization of the humeral head at glenoid version angles of 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of retroversion and 5° of anteversion was significantly different (P < 0.001). Every increment of 5° of retroversion led to an additional decentralization of the humeral head overall by (average ± SD) 2.0 mm ± 0.3 in the intact and 2.0 mm ± 0.7 in the detached labrum condition. The repaired showed significantly lower posterior translation compared to the intact condition at 10° (P = 0.012) and 15° (P < 0.01) of retroversion. In addition, CT measured parameters (depth, diameter, and native version) of the glenoid showed no correlation with angle of dislocation of each specimen.

CONCLUSION

Bony alignment in terms of glenoid retroversion angle plays an important role in joint centration and posterior translation, especially in retroversion angles greater than 10°. Isolated posterior labrum repair has a significant effect on posterior translation in glenoid retroversion angles of 5° and 10°. Bony correction of glenoid version may be considered to address posterior shoulder instability with retroversion > 15°.

Scapular Notching in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Scapular notching is a common radiographic finding occurring after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and it refers to an erosive lesion of the inferior scapular neck because of the impingement of the humeral implant during adduction. The clinical importance of notching is unclear, and the optimal treatment of severe notching is unknown. The incidence and severity of scapular notching is related to prosthetic design and surgical technique. Implant design factors include size, shape, and position of the glenosphere, inclination of the humeral neck-shaft angle, implant offset, and native scapular anatomy. Scapular notching may lead to deterioration of functional outcomes and glenoid implant loosening and failure. Lateral offset, inferior glenosphere overhang, and careful consideration of the presurgical glenoid morphology may help prevent scapular notching. Currently, there is limited evidence to direct the management of scapular notching, and further research is needed to elucidate optimal prevention and treatment strategies.

The role of bone in glenohumeral stability

Shoulder stability depends on several factors, either anatomical or functional. Anatomical factors can be further subclassified under soft tissue (shoulder capsule, glenoid rim, glenohumeral ligaments etc) and bony structures (glenoid cavity and humeral head).

Normal glenohumeral stability is maintained through factors mostly pertaining to the scapular side: glenoid version, depth and inclination, along with scapular dynamic positioning, can potentially cause decreased stability depending on the direction of said variables in the different planes. No significant factors in normal humeral anatomy seem to play a tangible role in affecting glenohumeral stability.

When the glenohumeral joint suffers an episode of acute dislocation, either anterior (more frequent) or posterior, bony lesions often develop on both sides: a compression fracture of the humeral head (or Hill–Sachs lesion) and a bone loss of the glenoid rim. Interaction of such lesions can determine ‘re-engagement’ and recurrence.

The concept of ‘glenoid track’ can help quantify an increased risk of recurrence: when the Hill–Sachs lesion engages the anterior glenoid rim, it is defined as ‘off-track’; if it does not, it is an ‘on-track’ lesion. The position of the Hill–Sachs lesion and the percentage of glenoid bone loss are critical factors in determining the likelihood of recurrent instability and in managing treatment.

In terms of posterior glenohumeral instability, the ‘gamma angle concept’ can help ascertain which lesions are prone to recurrence based on the sum of specific angles and millimetres of posterior glenoid bone loss, in a similar fashion to what happens in anterior shoulder instability.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:632-640. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180028

Etiology of Shoulder Arthritis in Young Patients

The manifestation of glenohumeral arthritis in the young adult is a devastating occurrence that can be difficult to manage. This review details the many underlying etiologies including genetic causes, congenital abnormalities, glenohumeral instability, posttraumatic lesions, postcapsulorraphy arthropathy, osteonecrosis, intraarticular pain pump postoperative use, radiofrequency/thermal capsulorraphy treatments, septic arthritis/infection, and inflammatory arthropathies. Although each of these potential causes have been well-studied, their contributions to the development of glenohumeral arthritis in the young person has not been described extensively.

Glenoid osteotomy for atraumatic posteroinferior shoulder instability associated with glenoid dysplasia

Aims

We report the clinical results of glenoid osteotomy in patients with atraumatic posteroinferior instability associated with glenoid dysplasia.

Patients and Methods

The study reports results in 211 patients (249 shoulders) with atraumatic posteroinferior instability. The patients comprised 63 men and 148 women with a mean age of 20 years. The posteroinferior glenoid surface was elevated by osteotomy at the scapular neck. A body spica was applied to maintain the arm perpendicular to the glenoid for two weeks postoperatively. Clinical results were evaluated using the Rowe score and Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Score (JSS-SIS); bone union, osteoarthrosis, and articular congruity were examined on plain radiographs.

Results

The Rowe score improved from 36 to 88 points, and the JSS-SIS improved from 47 to 81 points. All shoulders exhibited union without progression of osteoarthritis except one shoulder, which showed osteoarthritic change due to a previous surgery before the glenoid osteotomy. All but three shoulders showed improvement in joint congruency. Eight patients developed disordered scapulohumeral rhythm during arm elevation, and 12 patients required additional open stabilization for anterior instability.

Conclusion

Good results can be expected from glenoid osteotomy in patients with atraumatic posteroinferior instability associated with glenoid dysplasia. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:331–7.

Arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability in patients with and without glenoid dysplasia: a comparative outcomes analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of glenoid dysplasia on outcomes after isolated arthroscopic posterior labral repair in a young military population.

METHODS

Thirty-seven male patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair for symptomatic posterior shoulder instability were evaluated at a mean duration of 3.1 years. A comparative analysis was performed for those with glenoid dysplasia and without dysplasia. Additional factors analyzed included military occupational specialty (MOS), preoperative mental health clinical encounters and mental health medication use, and radiographic characteristics (version, posterior humeral head subluxation, and posterior capsular area) on a preoperative standard shoulder magnetic resonance arthrogram. The groups were analyzed with regard to shoulder outcome scores (subjective shoulder value [SSV], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] rating scale, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index [WOSI]), need for revision surgery, and medical separation from the military.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients, 3 (8.1%) underwent revision surgery and 6 (16%) underwent medical separation. Overall outcome assessment demonstrated a mean SSV of 67.9 (range, 25-100) ± 22.1, mean ASES of 65.6 (range, 15-100) ±  22, and mean WOSI of 822.6 (range, 5-1854) ± 538. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome scores between the glenoid dysplasia and no dysplasia groups (SSV, P = .55; ASES, P = .57; WOSI, P = .56). MOS (P = .02) and a history of mental health encounters (P = .04) were significantly associated with diminished outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence or absence of glenoid dysplasia did not influence the outcome after arthroscopic posterior labral repair in a young military population. However, a history of mental health clinical encounters and an infantry MOS were significantly associated with poorer clinical outcomes.