Total Knee Arthroplasty After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Not Just a Routine Primary Arthroplasty

History of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not increase the risk of postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), offering substantial pain relief and functional improvement. With the rising incidence of sports-related injuries and advancements in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques, an increasing number of patients undergoing TKA have a history of ACLR. However, the impact of prior ACLR on postoperative complications and functional recovery after TKA remains controversial.

METHODS

This study performed a systematic search across four databases, including case-control and cohort studies reporting on the outcomes of TKA following ACLR. Primary endpoints included infection, reoperation, prosthesis revision, thrombosis, and postoperative stiffness following manual release under general anaesthesia, with results compared to those of a control group of patients receiving TKA for primary OA. Secondary endpoints were operative time and postoperative range of motion in both flexion and extension. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420250635375.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies were included in this study, involving 4381 participants, with 1112 undergoing TKA with ACLR history and 3269 undergoing TKA for primary OA. This study showed that the operative time of TKA after ACLR was significantly extended (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in postoperative infection, reoperation, prosthesis re-revision, thrombus, postoperative stiffness following manual release under general anaesthesia, and range of motion in both flexion and extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the operation time of TKA after ACLR was extended, the complication rate and postoperative functional recovery of TKA were not significantly different from those of primary OA patients. This study provided an evidence-based basis for preoperative assessment and patient management.

Effects of previous arthroscopic knee surgery on the outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential adverse effects of prior arthroscopic knee surgery on the prognosis of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and other relevant databases up to October 2024. Cohort studies comparing the outcomes of patients with and without previous arthroscopic knee surgery were retrieved. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the differences in postoperative function, complications, and revision rates between the arthroscopy and primary TKA groups.

RESULTS

The analysis included 11 cohort studies comprising a total of 194,367 patients; 13,086 of these patients had a history of knee arthroscopy. The meta-analysis results revealed no significant differences in postoperative range of motion, functional improvement, stiffness, periprosthetic fracture, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and other complications between the groups. However, the arthroscopic group showed a higher risk of postoperative prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). The revision rate was also higher in the arthroscopic group (Relative Risk (RR) 1.423, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.280 to 1.583). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased PJI risk within one year of arthroscopic TKA (RR 1.314, 95% CI 1.156 to 1.493). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results, and Egger's test showed no publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Prior arthroscopic surgery was not found to have significant impacts on the functional outcomes of TKA but was found to increase the risks of postoperative infection and revision.

Complications of total knee arthroplasty in patients with prior anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to a matched cohort

Background

Current literature reports a 500 % increase in reoperation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of ACLR on subsequent TKA.

Methods

This retrospective case control study included 30 patients that underwent TKA following an ACLR who were matched 3:1 to a control cohort at a single tertiary academic center between January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2021. The electronic medical records were queried for demographics, complications, history of ACLR, and range of motion (ROM) preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months and 1 year. Student's t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis (α = 0.05).

Results

The mean ROM between the ACLR and control groups preoperatively, at 3 months and at 1 year postoperatively were 108.2° v 104.8° (p = 0.42), 114.0° v 111.8° (p = 0.51), and 115.3° v 115.8° (p = 0.88). At 1 year, 9 of 30 (30 %) ACLR patients decreased ROM versus 14 of 90 (15.6 %) control patients (mean loss of 21.4° v 11.9°, p = 0.076). No difference in complication rate was found (10 % v 11.1 %, p = 1). Complications in the ACLR group included open debridement and capsular release for stiffness after 2 failed manipulations under anesthesia (MUA), lysis of adhesions for patellar clunk, and revision surgery for flexion instability. No control patients required MUA.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that TKA following ACLR is without an increased risk of complications. However, ACLR patients should be followed closely since loss of ROM can be large.

Aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty in the era of robotic-assisted technology

Aims

Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with manual jig-based instruments has been reported to be as high as 30%. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been increasingly used in an effort to improve patient outcomes, however there is a paucity of literature examining patient satisfaction after RA-TKA. This study aims to identify the incidence of patients who were not satisfied following RA-TKA and to determine factors associated with higher levels of dissatisfaction.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 674 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2016 and September 2020 with a minimum two-year follow-up. A five-point Likert satisfaction score was used to place patients into two groups: Group A were those who were very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or neutral (Likert score 1 to 3) and Group B were those who were satisfied or very satisfied (Likert score 4 to 5). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, were compared between groups.

Results

Overall, 45 patients (6.7%) were in Group A and 629 (93.3%) were in Group B. Group A (vs Group B) had a higher proportion of male sex (p = 0.008), preoperative chronic opioid use (p < 0.001), preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.01), prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (p < 0.001), and preoperative symptomatic lumbar spine disease (p = 0.004). Group A was also younger (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative opioid use (p = 0.012), prior ACL reconstruction (p = 0.038), male sex (p = 0.006), and preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.001) as independent predictive factors of patient dissatisfaction.

Conclusion

The use of RA-TKA demonstrated a high rate of patient satisfaction (629 of 674, 93.3%). Demographics for patients not satisfied following RA-TKA included: male sex, chronic opioid use, chronic psychotropic medication use, and prior ACL reconstruction. Patients in these groups should be identified preoperatively and educated on realistic expectations given their comorbid conditions.

The impact of prior ACL reconstruction on total knee arthroplasty outcomes: a retrospective matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Discrepant data exists regarding the outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a prior anterior cruciate reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of our study was to compare surgical and medical outcomes in the patients with prior ACLR undergoing TKAs compared to a matched control group of the patients who had undergone TKAs without prior ACLR. We hypothesized that the patients with prior ACLR would have inferior clinical outcomes.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We retrospectively queried the PearlDiver-database for patients who underwent TKA following ACLR from 2011 to 2020. We used propensity-score matching to create two cohorts. The two-sided independent t-test and Chi-Squared test were used.

RESULTS

We identified 2,174 patients who had prior ACLR before the TKAs. There were another 1,348,870 patients who did not have ACLR before the TKAs. After matching, each group had 2,171 patients. The ACLR-TKA group had significantly lower rates of aseptic revision at 2 years (1.2% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.3, p < 0.01), PJI requiring antibiotic spacer at 2 years (0.3% vs. 0.8%, OR 0.35, p = 0.02), and MUA at 90 days (0.4% vs. 7.5%, OR 0.05, p < 0.01). The rate of wound disruption was lower for the ACLR-TKA group at 90 days (p = 0.03) as were several medical complications including AKI at 90 days (p < 0.01), DVT at 90 days (p < 0.01), pneumonia at 90 days (0.04), and required blood transfusion at 90 days (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These results differed from our expectations. Within the limitations of the study, we are unable to determine the factors for the lower complications in the ACLR-TKA group. The data from this study are different from what had been reported in the previous studies.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Background

Previous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a risk factor for the development of knee osteoarthritis. Despite advances in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) techniques, many patients with history of ACLR develop end-stage osteoarthritis necessitating total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of prior ACLR on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of TKA.

Methods

This was a single-centre matched cohort study of all patients with prior ACLR undergoing primary TKA from January 2000 to May 2022. Patients were matched 1:1 to patients undergoing TKA with no prior ACL injury based on age, sex, and body mass index. Outcomes investigated included TKA procedure duration, soft-tissue releases, implant design, and complications requiring reoperation.

Results

Forty-two ACLR patients were identified and matched to controls. Mean follow-up was 6.8 years and 5.0 years in the ACLR and control cohorts, respectively (P = .115). ACLR patients demonstrated longer procedure durations (122.8 minutes vs 87.0 minutes, P < .001) and more frequently required soft-tissue releases (40.5% vs 14.3%, P = .007), stemmed implants (23.8% vs 4.8%, P = .013), and patellar resurfacing (59.5% vs 26.2%, P = .002). There were no significant differences in postoperative clinical or surgical outcomes between groups. Ten-year implant survivorship was 92% and 95% in the ACLR and control cohorts, respectively (P = .777).

Conclusions

TKA is an effective procedure for the management of end-stage osteoarthritis with prior ACLR. The care team should be prepared for longer operative times and the utilization of advanced techniques to achieve satisfactory soft-tissue balance and implant stability.

Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years

INTRODUCTION

There have been controversial studies on the impact of prior knee arthroscopy (KA) on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this comparative study is to investigate the impact of prior KA of medial meniscus on patients undergoing TKA by evaluating the International Knee Society Score (IKS), the complications, and revisions.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 84 patients with TKA who had undergone prior KA of the medial meniscus and compared them to 84 cases, without a history of prior KA as a control group. Outcomes were assessed with the original IKS scores and complications. The mean follow-up was 8 years.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups with respect to demographics, or pre-operative IKS. The mean pre and postoperative IKS was not different between groups. The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were not significantly higher than those of the control group.

CONCLUSION

The present study seems to reveal that previous KA of the medial meniscus does not negatively affect a subsequent TKA. Nevertheless, larger studies may be necessary to confirm this observation.

A Torn or Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Does Not Adversely Affect Clinical Outcome Scores and the Incidence of Reoperation After Unrestricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There are no reports as to whether the condition of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) adversely affects the 2 to 3 year function and reoperation risk of a kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and an intermediate medial conforming (MC) insert.

METHODS

A single surgeon's prospective database query identified 418 consecutive primary TKAs performed between January 2019 and December 2019. The surgeon recorded the ACL condition in the operative note. Patients filled out the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement at the final follow-up. There were 299 patients with an intact ACL, 99 with a torn ACL, and 20 with a reconstructed ACL. The mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 20 to 45).

RESULTS

The median FJS, OKS, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of the reconstructed/torn/intact KA TKAs were 90/79/67, 47/44/43, and 92/88/80 points, respectively. The median OKS and KOOS of the reconstructed ACL cohort were 4 and 11 points higher than in the intact ACL cohort (P = .003, .04). One patient who had a reconstructed ACL underwent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness. The 5 reoperations in the intact ACL cohort were for instability (n = 2), revision after failed MUA for stiffness (n = 2), and infection (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that patients who have a torn and reconstructed ACL can expect high function and a low risk of reoperation comparable to patients who have an intact ACL when treated with unrestricted, caliper-verified KA, PCL retention, and an intermediate MC insert.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who had a Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Balancing Remains the Issue

BACKGROUND

Following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, 20% of patients will develop osteoarthritis. Despite this, there remains a paucity of data describing outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after prior ACL reconstruction. We aimed to describe survivorships, complications, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of TKA after ACL reconstruction in one of the largest series to date.

METHODS

We identified 160 patients (165 knees) who underwent primary TKA following prior ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2016 using our total joint registry. The mean age at TKA was 56 years (range, 29-81), 42% were women, and their mean body mass index was 32. Ninety percent of knees were posterior-stabilized designs. Survivorship was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up was 8 years.

RESULTS

The 10-year survivorships free of any revision and any reoperation were 92 and 88%, respectively. Seven patients were revised for instability (6 global and 1 flexion), 4 for infection, and 2 for other reasons. There were 5 additional reoperations: 3 manipulations under anesthesia, 1 wound debridement, and 1 arthroscopic synovectomy for patellar clunk. Nonoperative complications occurred in 16 patients, 4 of which were flexion instability. Radiographically, all nonrevised knees were well-fixed. Knee Society Function Scores significantly improved from preoperative to 5 years postoperative (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Survivorship of TKA in post-ACL reconstruction knees was lower than expected with instability being the most common reason for revision. In addition, the most common nonrevision complications were flexion instability and stiffness requiring manipulations under anesthesia, indicating that achieving soft tissue balance in these knees may be difficult.

Early Failure of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Due to Massive Osteolysis Caused by Bio-Absorbable Interference Screws

We report an unusual case in which an unabsorbed bio-absorbable screw in the tibial tunnel of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed 11 years ago caused massive osteolysis and subsequent failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ACLR was performed using suspensory fixation on the femoral side and a bio-absorbable interference screw on the tibial side. Fragmentation of the bio-absorbable screw at the time of tibial component implantation is thought to have evoked an accelerated inflammatory response, causing osteolysis, which finally resulted in early failure of the TKA.

Complications, Implant Survivorships, and Functional Outcomes of Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty With Prior Hardware

BACKGROUND

End-stage knee osteoarthritis with retained periarticular hardware is a frequent scenario. Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to excellent outcomes, but poses unique challenges. The evidence supporting retention versus removal of hardware during TKA is controversial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA with prior hardware between January 2009 and December 2019 were identified. A total of 148 patients underwent TKA with prior hardware. The mean follow-up was 60 months (range, 24-223). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to study correlations among factors and surgical-related complications, prosthesis failures, and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 28 of 148 (18.9%). The use of a quadriceps snips in addition to a medial parapatellar arthrotomy was associated with a higher complication (odds ratio: 20.7, P < .05), implant failures (odds ratio: 13.9, P < .05), and lower the Veterans Rand 12 Mental Score (VR-12 MS) (-14.8, P < .05). Hardware removal versus retention and use of single versus multiple incisions were not associated with complications or prosthesis failures. Removal of all hardware was associated with significantly higher (+7.3, P < .05) VR-12 MS compared to retention of all hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

TKA with prior hardware was associated with more complications, implant failures, and lower VR-12 MS when a more constrained construct or quadriceps snip was performed. This probably reflects the level of difficulty of the procedure rather than the surgical approach used. Hardware removal or retention was not associated with complications or implant failures; however, removal rather than retention of all prior hardware is associated with increased general health outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, cohort without control.

The relationship between drop vertical jump action-observation brain activity and kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross-sectional fMRI study

BACKGROUND

Injury and reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) result in central nervous system alteration to control the muscles around the knee joint. Most individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) experience kinesiophobia which can prevent them from returning to activity and is associated with negative outcomes after ACLR. However, it is unknown if kinesiophobia alters brain activity after ACL injury.

OBJECTIVES

To compare brain activity between an ACLR group and matched uninjured controls during an action-observation drop vertical jump (AO-DVJ) paradigm and to explore the association between kinesiophobia and brain activity in the ACLR group.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 26 individuals, 13 with ACLR (5 males and 8 females, 20.62 ± 1.93 years, 1.71 ± 0.1 m, 68.42 ± 14.75 kg) and 13 matched uninjured controls (5 males and 8 females, 22.92 ± 3.17 years, 1.74 ± 0.10 m, 70.48 ± 15.38 kg). Individuals were matched on sex and activity level. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to evaluate the level of movement-related fear. To assay the brain activity associated with a functional movement, the current study employed an action-observation/motor imagery paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

RESULTS

The ACLR group had lower brain activity in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex relative to the uninjured control group. Brain activity of the left cerebellum Crus I and Crus II, the right cerebellum lobule IX, amygdala, middle temporal gyrus, and temporal pole were positively correlated with TSK-11 scores in the ACLR group.

CONCLUSION

Brain activity for the AO-DVJ paradigm was different between the ACLR group and uninjured controls. Secondly, in participants with ACLR, there was a positive relationship between TSK-11 scores and activity in brain areas engaged in fear and cognitive processes during the AO-DVJ paradigm.

Comparison of survival rates between total knee arthroplasty after a previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and primary total knee arthroplasty via propensity score matching

INTRODUCTION

Although the survival rate of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is not as favorable as that in patients treated with primary TKA without ligament reconstruction, the exact survival rates and complications associated with these procedures are still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to compare the revision rates of TKA in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) with a previous ACLR and those of patients with primary TKA with no history of knee surgery by using propensity score matching analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A list of patients who underwent TKA from January 1, 2008 to May 31, 2019 was obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database. Among these, 460 patients underwent TKA in a knee with a previous ACLR and 569,766 patients who underwent primary TKA due to degenerative OA. We performed propensity scoring matching to compare the revision rates including septic revision due to prosthetic joint infection after TKA and perioperative complication rates within 90 days after revision TKA between the two groups.

RESULTS

Matched patients were assigned to one of the two groups (group A: 2,201 patients who underwent TKA due to primary OA, group B: 448 patients who underwent TKA in a knee with a previous ACLR) based on the propensity score. The total number of revisions per 1000 person-years was significantly higher in group B than in group A (10.16 vs 4.66, respectively). Group B showed a higher risk of revision than group A at 10 years post-TKA (hazard ratio: 2.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-4.77). However, group B showed a similar risk of septic revision as group A (p = 0.44). Perioperative complications within 90 days after TKA showed no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons should be aware of the relatively higher revision rate of TKA in patients who had previously undergone an ACLR compared to that in patients who underwent primary TKA.

Total knee arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis is more challenging, but results in similar patient satisfaction - An analysis of 1646 cases

BACKGROUND

Patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) present a variety of technical challenges to surgeons. Surgical parameters, complication rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported as detrimental in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for PTOA. The purpose of this study was to compare these variables and satisfaction with the results of TKA in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis with a matched-pair cohort of primary osteoarthritis (POA).

METHODS

A registry-embedded prospective case-control study was performed. Of a total of 1646 TKAs, 155 were performed due to PTOA between 2012 and 2019. One-hundred and thirty-six could be one-to-one propensity score-matched to patients with POA undergoing primary TKA based on similar patient demographic variables. Outcomes investigated included operation time, estimated blood loss, types of implants, postoperative complications and PROs pre- and 1 year postoperatively as well as satisfaction with the results of surgery. Sub-cohort analysis was performed for patients with prior fracture and soft tissue trauma, respectively.

RESULTS

Surgical parameters were significantly different in disadvantages of PTOA: operation time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), blood transfusions (P = 0.039), type of implants (P < 0.001). Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) was necessary more often in the PTOA fracture group (odds ratio 5.01, (95% confidence interval 1.04; 24.07). PRO demonstrated no substantial differences after 1 year. Satisfaction with the results of TKA was as equally high in all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that TKAs in patients with PTOA require higher surgical effort but can result in similar PROs and satisfaction compared to POA, regardless of the underlying trauma.

Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency versus intactness for outcomes in patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: The unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedure is primarily indicated for osteoarthritis of the knee. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) defects have long been considered a contraindication to UKA. However, recent clinical studies have found that ACL defects do not affect postoperative outcomes in UKA. To elucidate whether ACL defects affect postoperative outcomes in UKA, we performed a systematic review and Meta-analysis of observational cohort studies comparing the effects of ACL defects and intactness on surgical outcomes in UKA.

Methods: In this study, we used “Anterior Cruciate Ligament”, “Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries” and “Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee” as the subject terms according to PICOS principles. These subject terms and the corresponding free texts were used to conduct a systematic search in the three major databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane on December 9, 2021. The main study variables included age, gender, region, definition of ACL defect and diagnosed diseases. The study used a random effect model to pool the effect of 95% CIs. To explore the sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results, a sensitivity analysis was performed.

Results: The systematic review found no significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes in the elderly population when unicondylar replacement was performed in the setting of multiple factors such as injury, defects, longitudinal tear, and synovial bursa injury defined as ACL deficiency. The primary clinical outcomes included postoperative revision, Tegner activity score, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). After statistical meta-analysis, postoperative outcomes such as postoperative revision (OR, 1.174; 95% CIs, 0.758–1.817) and Tegner activity score (OR, -0.084; 95% CIs, -0.320–0.151) were not statistically different.

Conclusion: There was no difference in postoperative revision rates and functional outcomes such as Tegner activity score between the ACL-deficient group compared with the ACL-intact group. For the present results, it is not advisable to consider ACL deficiency as a contraindication of UKA.

Total Knee Arthroplasty after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing in the United States, particularly in the older athlete. Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction are at higher risk for undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) later in life. TKA in patients with prior ACL reconstruction has been associated with longer operative time due in-part to difficulty with exposure and retained hardware. Outcomes after TKA in patients with prior ACL reconstruction are not well defined, with some reports showing increased rate of complications and higher risk of reoperation compared with routine primary TKA, but these results are based on small and nonrandomized cohorts. Future research is needed to determine whether graft choice or fixation technique for ACL reconstruction influences outcomes after subsequent TKA. Furthermore, whether outcomes are affected by choice of TKA implant design for patients with prior ACL reconstruction warrants further study. This review analyzes the epidemiology, operative considerations, and outcomes of TKA following ACL reconstruction.

Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Compromise the Functional Outcomes of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Although Revision for Progressive Arthritis May Occur Earlier

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is commonly considered a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of UKA after prior ACL reconstruction (rACL cohort) to UKA with an intact native ACL (nACL cohort).

METHODS

Forty-five patients from 3 institutions who underwent medial UKA after prior rACL were matched by age, gender, preoperative function scores, and body mass index to 90 patients who underwent UKA with an intact nACL. Primary outcomes were Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Oxford Knee Scores, Knee Society Functional Scores, and Kellgren-Lawrence scores in the unresurfaced, lateral tibiofemoral compartment. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and the need for revision to TKA.

RESULTS

At a mean of 3.6 years, all PROMs improved significantly with no differences identified between groups. The incidence of revision TKA was similar between cohorts (P = 1.00); however, the mean time to revision for progressive osteoarthritis was 4.0 years in the nACL group and 2.2 years in the rACL group. Twenty percent of rACL patients had a postoperative complication compared to 8% in the nACL group. Despite presenting with a similar degree of lateral arthritis, a greater percentage of patients developed Kellgren-Lawrence scores of ≥3 in the rACL cohort (9%) than in the nACL cohort (0%).

CONCLUSION

A previously reconstructed ACL does not appear to compromise the short-term functional outcomes of UKA; however, there is a higher rate of minor complications and progression of lateral compartment arthritis, which should be considered with patients in the shared decision process.

Knee Arthroplasty with Prior Ligamentous Knee Surgery: A Matched Case-Control Study

We aimed to evaluate the timing, operative details, and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with prior ligamentous knee surgery (LKS). All consecutive patients undergoing TKA with prior LKS at a single institution were identified from a large prospectively collected database. Patients were matched on a 2:1 basis according to age, sex, and body mass index to a group of patients without previous LKS undergoing primary TKA. A total of 39 patients with prior LKS and a mean age of 55.6 years (range: 42.8-76.4) were identified and matched with 78 patients without LKS with a mean age of 57.6 years (range: 44.0-79.4) undergoing primary TKA (p = 0.24). Significantly more posterior stabilized implants were used in patients with LKS compared with control patients (29 [74.3%] vs. 27 [34.6%], p < 0.001). In the LKS group, 15 patients (38.4%) required hardware removal. Postoperative complications and rate of further surgery were greater in the LCS group, but the difference was not significant (10.6 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.25). Mean difference in pre- to postoperative knee flexion and clinical outcome scores (12-item Short Form Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Oxford Knee Score) were similar between the two groups, with no cases of loosening or osteolysis. TKA with prior LKS often warranted hardware removal and generally more constrained implants. Those patients with prior LKS undergoing subsequent TKA have higher complication rates and an increased rate of subsequent surgery related to post-TKA stiffness.

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) represents a heterogeneous group of procedures and most commonly includes TKA performed after ligamentous reconstruction, periarticular open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

»

Relative to patients undergoing primary TKA, patients undergoing conversion TKA often have longer operative times and higher surgical complexity, which may translate into higher postoperative complication rates.

»

There is mixed evidence on implant survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures when comparing conversion TKA and primary TKA, with some studies noting no differences between the procedures and others finding decreased survivorship and outcome scores for conversion TKA.

»

By gaining an improved understanding of the unique challenges facing patients undergoing conversion TKA, clinicians may better set patient expectations, make intraoperative adjustments, and guide postoperative care.

Conversion rates and timing to total knee arthroplasty following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a US population-based study

PURPOSE

To define the rate of subsequent TKA following ACLR in a large US cohort and to identify factors that influence the risk of later undergoing TKA after ACLR.

METHODS

The California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database was queried from 2000 to 2014 to identify patients who underwent primary ACLR (ACL group). An age-and gender-matched cohort that underwent appendectomy was selected as the control group. The cumulative incidence of TKA was calculated and ten-year survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with failure defined as conversion to arthroplasty. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the risk factors for conversion to TKA following ACLR.

RESULTS

A total of 100,580 ACLR patients (mean age 34.48 years, 66.1%male) were matched to 100,545 patients from the general population. The ACL cohort had 1374 knee arthroplasty events; conversion rate was 0.71% at 2-year follow-up, 2.04% at 5-year follow-up, and 4.86% at 10-year follow-up. This conversion rate was higher than that of the control group at all time points, with an odds ratio of 3.44 (p<0.001) at 10-year follow-up. Decreasing survivorship following ACLR was observed with increasing age, female gender, and worker's compensation insurance, while increased survivorship was found in patients of Hispanic and Asian Pacific Islander racial heritage and those who underwent concomitant meniscal repair.

CONCLUSIONS

In this US statewide study, the rate of TKA after ACLR is higher than reported elsewhere, with significantly increased odds when compared to a control group. Age, gender, concomitant knee procedures and other socioeconomic factors influence the rate of conversion to TKA following ACLR.

The influence of previous arthroscopic treatment on subsequent primary total knee arthroplasty: the comparison between bilateral knees of the same patient

BACKGROUND

To explore whether previous arthroscopic knee surgery affects future total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results or not.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients with the previous arthroscopic treatment on one knee underwent subsequent bilateral total knee arthroplasty in our hospital from September 2012 to July 2018. Data on each patient were collected in regards to changes in postoperative clinical and functional scores, various other scores, as well as postoperative functional recovery and complications. We defined the knees with a previous arthroscopic history as group A, and the counter side as group B. The Knee Society clinical score, functional scores, range of motion (ROM), finger joint size (FJS), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed before and after surgery. Using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test to test the normality of continuous variables, and the chi-square test to compare the rate of reoperation and complications between two groups. For all statistical comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significance differences found in postoperative Knee Society clinical scores and functional scores between group A and group B, as well as in ROM, FJS, VAS scores and local complications.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences found in postoperative functional recovery and complications in patients, who underwent total knee arthroplasty with previous knee arthroscopy.

When can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed following prior arthroscopy?

Background

The optimal timing to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA, and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an endpoint. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA.

Results

The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The survivorship of the KA group and control group was 92.0 and 99.4% at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR] = 3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR = 4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-linear relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months.

Conclusion

Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within nine months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prior Fracture or Osteotomy Around the Knee Leads to Increased Resource Utilization

BACKGROUND

Prior knee surgery before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) puts patients at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased care cost. This study compares intraoperative and postoperative variables including procedure duration, components, length of stay, readmission, complications, and reoperations among patients undergoing conversion TKA.

METHODS

Primary TKA from a single-surgeon database identified 130 patients with prior knee surgery to form a "conversion" cohort. One-to-one matching identified 130 patients of similar age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender without prior knee surgery for comparison. Perioperative and 90-day postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without prior surgery, within the conversion group based on the type of prior surgery, and whether the prior surgery was bony or soft tissue.

RESULTS

The conversion group had longer mean operative time (96.1 vs 90.0 minutes, P = .01), higher revision component utilization (8.5% vs 0.8%, P = .005), and higher calculated blood loss (1440 vs 1249 mL, P = .004). Thirty-eight patients with prior fracture or osteotomy were compared to the remaining 92 patients in the conversion group and showed longer operative time (107.1 vs 91.3 minutes, P < .001), higher 90-day readmissions (18.4% vs 3.3%, P = .003), more complications (23.7% vs 8.7%, P = .021), and greater utilization of revision components (26.3% vs 1.1%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing conversion TKA required increased resource utilization, particularly patients with a prior osteotomy or fracture. Policymakers should consider these variables, as they did in conversion THA, in adding a code to account for increased case complexity and resource utilization.

Staged vs Concurrent Hardware Removal During Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Conversion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the presence of periarticular hardware can be associated with increased resource utilization, complications, and revisions. However, little guidance exists on the optimal approach to hardware removal. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of conversion TKA with hardware removal performed in either a staged or concurrent manner.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 155 TKA operations performed with staged (45) or concurrent (110) removal of hardware at the time of TKA. Differences in patient data, case data, complications, reoperations, and revisions were evaluated. Subgroup comparisons of cases involving major hardware (plates, nails, rods), minor hardware (screws, buttons, wires), and tibial plates were performed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, or comorbidities between patients who underwent staged or concurrent hardware removal. Rates of complications, reoperations, and revisions did not differ at multiple time points (90 days, 1 year, 2 years, 4 years). Patients who underwent staged hardware removal were more likely to have had prior surgery for fracture reconstruction (68% vs 33%, P < .001), to have had major hardware removed (84% vs 59%, P = .03), and were less likely to have had hardware removal performed through a single incision with TKA (50% vs 92%, P < .001). Subgroup analysis of major and minor hardware cases demonstrated comparable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There remains no established benefit to either a staged or concurrent approach to hardware removal at the time of TKA. This is true regardless of hardware burden. At this time, a case-by-case approach should be taken to conversion TKA in the presence of periarticular hardware.

Uncemented monoblock trabecular metal posterior stabilized high-flex total knee arthroplasty: similar pattern of migration to the cruciate-retaining design - a prospective radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical evaluation of 40 patients (49 knees) 60 years or younger with 9 years' follow-up

Background and purpose - Uncemented monoblock cruciate retaining (CR) trabecular metal (TM) tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) work well in the long-term perspective in patients ≤ 60 years. Younger persons expect nearly normal knee flexion after TKA, but CR implants generally achieve less knee flexion compared with posterior stabilized (PS) implants. Cemented PS implants have higher revision rate than CR implants. Can an uncemented monoblock PS TM implant be used safely in younger patients? Patients and methods - 40 patients (49 knees) age ≤ 60 years with primary (20 knees) or posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) were operated with a high-flex TKA using an uncemented monoblock PS TM tibial component. Knees were evaluated with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) a mean 3 days (1-5) postoperatively, and thereafter at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, and 9 years. Clinical outcome was measured with patient-related outcome measures (PROMs). Results - The implants showed a pattern of migration with initial large migration followed by early stabilization lasting up to 9 years, a pattern known to be compatible with good long-term results. Clinical and radiological outcome was excellent with 38 of the 40 patients being satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure and bone apposition to the entire implant surface in 46 of 49 knees. Mean knee flexion was 130°. 1 knee was revised at 3 months due to medial tibial condyle collapse. Interpretation - The uncemented monoblock PS TM implant works well in younger persons operated with TKA due to primary or secondary OA.

Does Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Outcomes of Subsequent Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

Background:

Anterior cruciate ligament injury may accelerate knee osteoarthritis, and patients with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) tend to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a greater rate than patients without a history of ACLR.

Purpose:

To compare clinical outcomes of TKA in patients with and without a history of ACLR through a systematic review.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A comprehensive search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central, and SPORTDiscus databases from inception through November 2018 was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes of TKA between patients with and without a history of ipsilateral ACLR. Eligible studies were included in this review if they reported at least 1 outcome measure.

Results:

Included for review were 5 retrospective case-control studies collectively evaluating TKA outcomes in 318 patients (176 males, 142 females) with a history of ACLR and 455 matched controls. The mean age in the ACLR and control groups was 58.5 years and 60.9 years, respectively. The mean follow-up period after arthroplasty was 3.4 years in the ACLR group and 3.3 years in the control group. The mean time between ACLR and arthroplasty was 21.8 years. Three studies noted greater operative time in the ACLR group than in the control group. No differences in intraoperative blood loss were reported. Greater preoperative extension deficits were noted in the ACLR group in 2 studies. Two studies reported increased preoperative Knee Society Score function scores in the ACLR group, but no differences in postoperative subjective outcome scores were noted in any of the studies. One study reported increased incidence of periprosthetic joint infection and a higher total reoperation rate in the ACLR group, and another study reported an increased incidence of manipulation under anesthesia in the ACLR group.

Conclusion:

Short- and midterm subjective scores and functional outcomes of TKA appear to be comparable in patients with and without a history of ACLR, although the risk for reoperation after TKA may be greater in patients with prior ACLR. Surgeons should anticipate increased operative time in patients with a history of ACLR. However, the findings of this review must be interpreted within the context of its limitations.

Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Distinct Surgical Procedure With Increased Resource Utilization

BACKGROUND

Current Procedural Terminology coding currently makes no distinction between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conversion TKA, in which periarticular hardware components must be removed prior to or during TKA. We hypothesize that conversion TKA will carry increased operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and 90-day emergency department/readmission rate compared to primary TKA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing conversion TKA from 2005 to 2017 were identified from an institutional database and matched to primary TKA patients by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and procedure date (±1 year). Intraoperative data and 90-day postoperative complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred nine conversion TKA patients with periarticular hardware were removed prior to (n = 51) or during (n = 58) TKA and 109 primary TKA control patients were included. Conversion TKA was associated with increased tourniquet time (91 vs 71 minutes, P < .001), operative time (147 vs 113 minutes, P < .001), blood loss (225 vs 176 mL, P = .010), 90-day readmissions (14.6% vs 4.2%, P = .020), wound complication (5.6% vs 0.0%, P = .025), periprosthetic joint infection (7.9% vs 0.0%, P = .005), irrigation/debridement (9.0% vs 1.1%, P = .016), and a trend toward increased mechanical complication (6.7% vs 1.1%, P = .058). Timing of hardware removal did not affect intraoperative or postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Conversion TKA is associated with higher operative time, blood loss, readmission rate, and postoperative complications compared to primary TKA. Without a proper billing code and appropriate reimbursement level to match the expected operative and postacute resource utilization by these cases, physicians may be disincentivized to perform these operations.

Increased utilization of constraint in total knee arthroplasty following anterior cruciate ligament and multiligament knee reconstruction

Aims

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and multiligament knee (MLK) injuries increase the risk of development of knee osteoarthritis and eventual need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are limited data regarding implant use and outcomes in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the use of constrained implants and outcomes among patients undergoing TKA with a history of prior knee ligament reconstruction (PKLR) versus a matched cohort of patients undergoing TKA with no history of PKLR.

Patients and Methods

Patients with a history of ACL or MLK reconstruction who underwent TKA between 2007 and 2017 were identified in a single-institution registry. There were 223 patients who met inclusion criteria (188 ACL reconstruction patients, 35 MLK reconstruction patients). A matched cohort, also of 223 patients, was identified based on patient age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and year of surgery. There were 144 male patients and 79 female patients in both cohorts. Mean age at the time of TKA was 57.2 years (31 to 88). Mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m2 (19.5 to 55.7).

Results

There was a significantly higher use of constrained implants among patients with PKLR (76 of 223, 34.1%) compared with the control group (40 of 223, 17.9%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a higher use of constrained implants among patients with prior MLK reconstruction (21 of 35, 60.0%) compared with ACL reconstruction (55 of 188, 29.3%; p < 0.001). Removal of hardware was performed in 69.5% of patients with PKLR. Mean operative time (p < 0.001) and tourniquet time (p < 0.001) were longer in patients with PKLR compared with controls. There were no significant differences in rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, infection, transfusion, postoperative knee range of movement (ROM), or need for revision surgery. There was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) scores between groups.

Conclusion

Results of this study suggest a history of PKLR results in increased use of constrained implants but no difference in postoperative knee ROM, patient-reported outcomes, or incidence of revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):77–83

Distal Femoral Replacement Following an Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fracture in a Patient with Prior Bone Mulch ACL Reconstruction

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures can be treated nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation or with more constrained prostheses. Distal femoral replacement is typically a last resort treatment option for comminuted periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures in patients with poor bone stock or resistant nonunions. We report the case of a 54-year-old female with a remote history of bone mulch ACL reconstruction who sustained an intraoperative comminuted bicondylar distal femur fracture during a primary total knee arthroplasty. This patient was treated with a distal femoral replacement and successfully returned to her preoperative function.

Total knee arthroplasty after Hauser procedure: beware of the patellar tendon!

Preoperative planning is a fundamental element in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A previous surgery that must be recognized and identified preoperatively is the Hauser procedure, a posteromedialization of the tibial tubercle for recurrent patellar instability. Here, we describe 2 case reports in patients with previous Hauser surgeries. The first TKA surgery was complicated from a standard medial peripatellar approach resulting in complete transection of the patellar tendon during standard arthrotomy. The tendon was repaired, and the arthroplasty was aborted. For the second case, correct preoperative identification of the Hauser procedure was performed. The second TKA surgery was performed using a lateral peripatellar arthrotomy with excellent exposure, resulting in a successful operation. Here, we highlight the importance of an accurate history, physical and radiographic examination, and the recommendation of an alternative TKA approach to help avoid the serious intraoperative complication of a patellar tendon laceration.

Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Effects on Future Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The impact of prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has rarely been studied. The objective of this study was to compare intraoperative characteristics in patients who underwent TKA with pre-existing hardware from prior ACL reconstruction with a matched cohort control group.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who had undergone primary TKA with pre-existing hardware from prior ACL reconstruction was performed from June 2012 through June 2017. These patients were 2-to-1 matched to the ACL group based on similar patient demographic and provider variables. Outcomes investigated included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean age was 54 ± 9 years, and the mean body mass index was 32.6 ± 6.5 kg/m². The ACL group was divided into 4 subgroups: group 1, no pre-existing hardware removed (22 TKAs); group 2, pre-existing hardware removed from the femur only (8 TKAs); group 3, pre-existing hardware removed from the tibia only (45 TKAs); and group 4, pre-existing hardware removed from both the femur and tibia (26 TKAs). There was no statistical difference in EBL and postoperative complication between the ACL group and controls. Statistical differences were detected between 2 subgroups regarding mean operative time variables: ACL group 3 (74 ± 23 minutes; control: 64 ± 21 minutes, P = .020) and group 4 (79 ± 24 minutes; control: 65 ± 19 minutes, P = .010).

CONCLUSION

Hardware retained, especially on the tibia, from prior ACL reconstruction has a major impact on TKA surgical procedure operative time but not on EBL and/or complications.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Few studies have analyzed the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and the reported outcomes are controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess if prior ACL reconstruction had any impact on the outcome of subsequent TKA.

METHODS

A matched case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent TKA, including 37 with prior ACL reconstruction and 37 patients without ACL reconstruction. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data were collected from a prospective arthroplasty database with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The mean age was 69.6 years, and 59.4% were men. The Knee Society scores, Short Form-12, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities questionnaires were used for functional evaluations. Visual analogue scale 0-10 was used for patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up after TKA was 6.1 (range 5-7.3) years. Two patients in the ACL group developed knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia, while 1 patient in the control group suffered superficial wound infection. At last follow-up, no significant differences in functional or radiologic outcomes were found between both groups. The performance of TKA in ACL patients had increased technical difficulty and significantly longer time of surgery, but this had no influence on the outcomes. In the ACL group, 24 knees had technical difficulty in surgery. The main difficulty in most ACL patients was due to varus deformity and increased retraction of the medial soft structures which required progressive medial release. Other 2 knees had difficult knee exposure. One was an unexpected partial patellar tendon avulsion and the other required planned quadriceps snip.

CONCLUSION

TKA was an effective procedure for patients with prior ACL reconstruction. The surgeon should be warned of the possible difficulties in the knee exposure and possible need of medial release to obtain an appropriate ligament balance. However, these additional procedures had no negative effect on the outcomes of TKA.