Quantitative Measurement of Osseous Pathology in Advanced Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Short-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with nonaugmented glenoid component for Walch B2 and B3 glenoid morphology

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of posterior glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains unknown, as the degree of bone loss and retroversion can vary across a wide spectrum in glenoids with Walch B2 and B3 morphology. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of utilizing standard, all-polyethylene, nonaugmented anchor-peg glenoid (APG) components in aTSA for patients with mild to moderate B2 or B3 morphology.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and September 2019, we identified 79 shoulders with mild to moderate B2 or B3 glenoid morphology that underwent aTSA with use of a nonaugmented APG glenoid component and minimum 2 years clinical and radiographic follow-up. In each case, the surgeon had access to an augmented glenoid component but chose to use a standard component based upon the presence of mild to moderate deformity, defined as the ability to template components within 10° of premorbid glenoid vault retroversion and within 3 mm of premorbid glenoid vault joint line based on preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography planning. The Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), glenoid anchor-peg osteolysis (APO) (grade 1 vs. 2 and 3), and humeral head subluxation (HHS) were the main outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

The cohort included 63/79 (80%) B2 glenoids and 17/79 (21%) B3 glenoids. Median patient age at surgery was 64.2 years [interquartile range {IQR} 59.6; 68.5]; median preoperative retroversion was 13.0° [IQR 9.8; 15.4]; and median preoperative joint line medialization was 1.4 mm [IQR 0.4; 2.4]. Median follow-up duration was 4.3 years [IQR 2.5; 6.8]; The PSS and HHS were improved amongst all patients postoperatively (P < .0001), with a median PSS at latest follow-up of 96.0 [IQR 88.5; 99.0] and posterior HHS present in 11.8% at final follow-up. There were 4 complications in the cohort (5.0%), one of which required reoperation due to persistent posterior HHS. Postoperative grade 1 APO was present on latest radiographs in 8/79 (10.1%) cases. Walch classification, preoperative glenoid version, inclination, and joint line medialization as measured on 3-dimensional computed tomography were not significantly associated with PSS or APO at final follow-up. Higher PSS at final follow-up was associated with better shoulder range of motion. APO at final follow-up was not associated with lower PSS.

DISCUSSION

The use of nonaugmented polyethylene APG components in patients undergoing aTSA with mild to moderate B2 and B3 glenoids results in significant improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates at short-term follow-up. Further follow-up of this cohort is needed to better understand the implications of glenoid component APO on loosening patterns and failure rates in the long-term.

A scapular statistical shape model can reliably predict premorbid glenoid morphology in conditions of severe glenoid bone loss

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of premorbid glenoid parameters at the time of shoulder arthroplasty, such as inclination, version, joint line position, height, and width, can assist with implant selection, implant positioning, metal augment sizing, and/or bone graft dimensions. The objective of this study was to validate a scapular statistical shape model (SSM) in predicting patient-specific glenoid morphology in scapulae with clinically relevant glenoid erosion patterns.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 30 healthy scapulae were obtained and used as the control group. Each scapula was then virtually eroded to create 7 erosion patterns (Walch A1, A2, B2, B3, D, Favard E2, and E3). This resulted in 210 uniquely eroded glenoid models, forming the eroded glenoid group. A scapular SSM, created from a different database of 85 healthy scapulae, was then applied to each eroded scapula to predict the premorbid glenoid morphology. The premorbid glenoid inclination, version, height, width, radius of best-fit sphere, and glenoid joint line position were automatically calculated for each of the 210 eroded glenoids. The mean values for all outcome variables were compared across all erosion types between the healthy, eroded, and SSM-predicted groups using a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The SSM was able to predict the mean premorbid glenoid parameters of the eroded glenoids with a mean absolute difference of 3° ± 2° for inclination, 3° ± 2° for version, 2 ± 1 mm for glenoid height, 2 ± 1 mm for glenoid width, 5 ± 4 mm for radius of best-fit sphere, and 1 ± 1 mm for glenoid joint line. The mean SSM-predicted values for inclination, version, height, width, and radius were not significantly different than the control group (P > .05).

DISCUSSION

An SSM has been developed that can reliably predict premorbid glenoid morphology and glenoid indices in patients with common glenoid erosion patterns. This technology can serve as a useful template to visually represent the premorbid healthy glenoid in patients with severe glenoid bony erosions. Knowledge of the premorbid glenoid preoperatively can assist with implant selection, positioning, and sizing.

Reliability of the Walch Classification for Characterization of Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The Walch classification has been widely accepted and further developed as a method to characterize glenohumeral arthritis. However, many studies have reported low and inconsistent measures of the reliability of the Walch classification. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the reliability of the Walch classification and characterize how imaging modality and classification modifications affect reliability.

METHODS

A systematic review of publications that included reliability of the Walch classification reported through intraobserver and interobserver kappa values was conducted. A search in January 2021 and repeated in July 2023 used the terms ["Imaging" OR "radiography" OR "CT" OR "MRI"] AND ["Walch classification"] AND ["Glenoid arthritis" OR "Shoulder arthritis"]. All clinical studies from database inception to July 2023 that evaluated the Walch or modified Walch classification's intraobserver and/or interobserver reliability were included. Cadaveric studies and studies that involved subjects with previous arthroplasty, shoulder débridement, glenoid reaming, interposition arthroplasty, and latarjet or bankart procedure were excluded. Articles were categorized by imaging modality and classification modification.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria. Three involved the evaluation of plain radiographs, 10 used CT, two used three-dimensional (3D) CT, and four used magnetic resonance imaging. Nine studies involved the original Walch classification system, five involved a simplified version, and four involved the modified Walch. Six studies examined the reliability of raters of varying experience levels with none reporting consistent differences based on experience. Overall intraobserver reliability of the Walch classifications ranged from 0.34 to 0.92, and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.132 to 0.703. No consistent trends were observed in the effect of the imaging modalities or classification modifications on reliability.

DISCUSSION

The reliability of the Walch classification remains inconsistent, despite modification and imaging advances. Consideration of the limitations of the classification system is important when using it for treatment or prognostic purposes.

Surgical management of biconcave glenoids: a scoping review

Biconcave (B2) glenoids, characterized by significant posterior glenoid bone loss and a biconcave wear pattern, are a challenging pathology in shoulder surgery. Significant bone defects present in B2 glenoids increases the risk of complications and rates of failure for operative patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Diagnosing this entity is of pivotal importance, and can be accomplished with imaging and a comprehensive clinical investigation. There are no clear-cut guidelines for management, but options include hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In recent years, modern techniques such as corrective reaming, bone grafts, and the use of augmented components have improved patient outcomes. Educating prospective patients is essential for reaching a shared management decision, setting appropriate expectations, and optimizing prognostic outcomes.

Glenoid-based reference system to differentiate shoulder pathologies on plain radiographs

BACKGROUND

Shoulder radiographs are used for evaluation and the planning of treatment of various pathologies. Making a diagnosis of these pathologies on plain radiographs occurs by recognizing the relationship of the humeral head on the registry of the glenoid. Quantification of these changes in registry does not currently exist. We hypothesize that a geometric relationship of the humeral head and the glenoid exists that is defined on an anteroposterior Grashey view radiograph by the relationship of the best-fit circle of the humeral head relative to the best-fit circle of the glenoid such that relative measurements will define the normal shoulder and the pathologic shoulder.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six shoulders were included: 53 normal shoulders, 51 with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), and 52 with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Humeral head best-fit circle was used to define the circle of the humeral head (cHH). A glenoid best-fit circle (cG) was defined by the following rules: (1) best fit of the glenoid articular surface and (2) was limited by the acromion such that either (a) it reaches maximal interaction with the inferior surface of the acromion or (b) the perimeter of the circle is at the lateralmost point of the acromion. The relationship between cHH and cG is defined by measurement of cHH in horizontal and vertical planes relative to the glenoid circle reference. The horizontal displacement angle (HDA) measures the horizontal position of cHH relative to cG, representing the degree of medialization toward the glenoid. The vertical displacement angle (VDA) measures the vertical position of cHH relative to cG, representing the degree of superiorization toward the acromion. Angles were compared by diagnosis and sex.

RESULTS

The mean HDA was 61.0° (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.3°-61.7°) in normal shoulders, 79.9° (95% CI 76.9°-82.9°) in GHOA, and 63.4° (95% CI 61.7°-65.1°) in CTA (P < .001). The mean VDA was 43.1° (95% CI 42.2°-44.0°) in normal shoulders, 40.9° (95% CI 39.9°-42.0°) in GHOA, and 59.7° (95% CI 57.6°-61.7°) in CTA (P < .001). Interobserver reliability was 0.991 (95% CI 0.94-1.0) and intraobserver reliability was 0.998 (95% CI 0.99-1.0). The geometric relationship of cHH to the glenoid circle reference was plotted for each group.

CONCLUSION

A geometric relationship exists of the humeral head in reference to the glenoid circle. Together, the HDA and the VDA distinguish between a normal shoulder and those with GHOA or CTA. This suggests that this novel methodology may provide a preoperative planning tool that is easily accessible.

Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Biological Advantage or a Missed Diagnosis?

(1) Background: Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that is commonly diagnosed in the aging population. Interestingly, the lower extremity joints have a higher published incidence of osteoarthritis than the upper extremity joints. Although much is known about the disease process, it remains unclear why some joints are more affected than others. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing the search engines PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elsevier from 2014 to 2024, directing our search to osteoarthritis of various joints, with the focus being on glenohumeral osteoarthritis. (3) Results and Discussion: The literature review revealed a publication difference, which may be explained by the inconsistency in classification systems utilized in the diagnosis of shoulder osteoarthritis. For instance, there are six classification systems employed in the diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, making the true incidence and, therefore, the prevalence unobtainable. Furthermore, susceptibility to osteoarthritis in various joints is complicated by factors such as joint anatomy, weight-bearing status, and prior injuries to the joint. (4) Conclusions: This review reveals the lack of understanding of shoulder osteoarthritis's true incidence and prevalence while considering the anatomy and biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint. In addition, this is the first paper to suggest a single criterion for the diagnosis of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA.

RESULTS

Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1.

CONCLUSION

The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.

Maximizing Implant Stability in the Face of Glenoid Bone Stock Deficiency

As the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty continues to rise, encountering significant glenoid bone loss in the primary and revision setting is becoming a common occurrence. To effectively treat these difficult scenarios, surgeons must understand the common patterns of glenoid bone loss and be aware of the various techniques available for treatment. Understanding bone loss requires careful pre-operative evaluation with appropriate imaging and pre-operative planning software. Treatment algorithms consist of primary anatomic and reverse arthroplasty as well as the use of allograft or autograft bone grafting, augmented glenoid components, specialized surgical techniques, or custom implant designs. Ultimately, good outcomes are able to be obtained with various techniques when applied to the appropriate clinical situation.

Validation of a novel 3-dimensional classification for degenerative arthritis of the shoulder

INTRODUCTION

A novel three-dimensional classification to comprehensively describe degenerative arthritis of the shoulder (DAS) was recently published by our group. The purpose of the present work was to investigate intra- and interobserver agreement as well as validity for the three-dimensional classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of 100 patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty for DAS were randomly selected. Four observers independently classified the CT scans twice, with an interval of 4 weeks, after prior three-dimensional reconstruction of the scapula plane using a clinical image viewing software. Shoulders were classified according to biplanar humeroscapular alignment as posterior, centered or anterior (> 20% posterior, centered, > 5% anterior subluxation of humeral head radius) and superior, centered or inferior (> 5% inferior, centered, > 20% superior subluxation of humeral head radius). Glenoid erosion was graded 1-3. Gold-standard values based on precise measurements from the primary study were used for validity calculations. Observers timed themselves during classification. Cohen's weighted κ was employed for agreement analysis.

RESULTS

Intraobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.71). Interobserver agreement was moderate with a mean κ of 0.46. When the additional descriptors extra-posterior and extra-superior were included, agreement did not change substantially (κ = 0.44). When agreement for biplanar alignment alone was analyzed, κ was 0.55. The validity analysis reached moderate agreement (κ = 0.48). Observers took on average 2 min and 47 s (range 45 s to 4 min and 1 s) per CT for classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-dimensional classification for DAS is valid. Despite being more comprehensive, the classification shows intra- and interobserver agreement comparable to previously established classifications for DAS. Being quantifiable, this has potential for improvement with automated algorithm-based software analysis in the future. The classification can be applied in under 5 min and thus can be used in clinical practice.

Treatment of Glenoid Wear with the Use of Augmented Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review

» Treatment of glenoid bone loss continues to be a challenge in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Although correcting glenoid wear to patient's native anatomy is desirable in TSA, there is lack of consensus regarding how much glenoid wear correction is acceptable and necessary in both anatomic and reverse TSA.» Use of augmented glenoid components is a relatively new treatment strategy for addressing moderate-to-severe glenoid wear in TSA. Augmented glenoid components allow for predictable and easy correction of glenoid wear in the coronal and/or axial planes while at the same time maximizing implant seating, improving rotator cuff biomechanics, and preserving glenoid bone stock because of off-axis glenoid reaming.» Augmented glenoid components have distinct advantages over glenoid bone grafting. Glenoid bone grafting is technically demanding, adds to the surgical time, and carries a risk of nonunion and graft resorption with subsequent failure of the glenoid component.» The use of augmented glenoid components in TSA is steadily increasing with easy availability of computed tomography-based preoperative planning software and guidance technology (patient-specific instrumentation and computer navigation).» Although different augment designs (full wedge, half wedge, and step cut) are available and a particular design may provide advantages in specific glenoid wear patterns to minimize bone removal (i.e. a half wedge in B2 glenoids), there is no evidence to demonstrate the superiority of 1 design over others.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Shoulder Pain: 2022 Update

Chronic shoulder pain is an extremely common presenting complaint. Potential pain generators include the rotator cuff tendons, biceps tendon, labrum, glenohumeral articular cartilage, acromioclavicular joint, bones, suprascapular and axillary nerves, and the joint capsule/synovium. Radiographs are typically the initial imaging study obtained in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Further imaging may often be required, with modality chosen based on patient symptoms and physical examination findings, which may lead the clinician to suspect a specific pain generator. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Three-Dimensional Scapular Border Method for Glenoid Version Measurements

Variations among methods to measure glenoid version have created uncertainty regarding which method provides the most consistent measurements of morphology. Greater deformity may also make accurate depiction of the native morphology more challenging. This study examined 4 current methods (Friedman, corrected Friedman, Ganapathi-Iannotti, and Matsumura) and an experimental scapular border-derived coordinate system method, to compare measurement inconsistencies between methods and reference systems and assess the impact of glenoid deformity on measured glenoid version.

Methods

Three-dimensional scapulae were created from computed tomography (CT) scans of 74 shoulders that had undergone arthroplasty (28 A2, 22 B2, 10 B3, and 14 C glenoids) and 34 shoulders that had not undergone arthroplasty. Glenoid version measurements were made in Mimics using the 4 methods. For the experimental method, scapulae were reconstructed, and 3 orthogonal global coordinate planes (GCPs) were derived from the medial and lateral borders. Version was measured as the angle between the sagittal reference plane and an anterior-posterior glenoid vector. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the Friedman and corrected Friedman methods. Inconsistencies were assessed for all methods using the interquartile range, mean and standard deviation, and repeated-measures analysis of variance. Concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated to assess agreement among the methods.

Results

Scapular plane-based methods (experimental, Friedman, and corrected Friedman) yielded an average version between -10° and -12°, with average measurement differences among these methods of <2°. Vault methods (Ganapathi-Iannotti and Matsumura) overestimated or underestimated version by an average of 5° to 7° compared with scapular plane-based methods, and showed significant differences of >12° when compared with each other. Scapular plane-based methods maintained consistency with increasing deformity.

Conclusions

The other methods of version measurement using the scapular planes as the reference were highly comparable with the corrected Friedman method. However, when the reference plane was the glenoid vault, version measurements were inconsistent with scapular plane-based methods, which is attributed to differences in the reference systems. In surgical planning, the coordinate system utilized will impact version measurements, which can result in variations in the planned surgical solutions. Additionally, as glenoid deformity increases, this variation resulting from the utilization of different coordinate systems is magnified.

Preoperative Planning for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The success of total shoulder arthroplasty is dependent on both proper patient selection and restoration of the native anatomy. After proper patient selection, preoperative planning is essential to select implants that will allow the surgeon to properly restore soft-tissue tension and correct for deformity. Although it is possible to template implants with plain radiographs, these do not allow accurate measurements of the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the glenohumeral joint. CT can be used to further examine version of the glenoid and humerus, as well as humeral head subluxation. Three-dimensional reconstructions also allow for virtual implantation, resulting in a more reliable prediction of implant appearance. Commercial software is available that calculates parameters such as version; however, these have been shown to have variability when compared with measurements obtained by surgeons. Patient-specific instrumentation can also be obtained based on preoperative measurements; however, although it allowed for improved measurements when compared with two-dimensional imaging, there has been no difference in version error, inclination error, or positional offset of the glenoid implant when comparing patient-specific instrumentation with standard instrumentation. Intraoperative navigation can also be used to give real-time feedback on implant positioning; however, additional studies are needed to fully evaluate its benefit.

Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a biconvex posterior augmented glenoid for patients with posterior glenoid erosion: minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Glenoid bone loss in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains a controversial and challenging clinical problem. Previous studies have shown high rates of glenoid loosening for aTSA in shoulders with retroversion, posterior bone loss, and posterior humeral head subluxation. This study is the first to present minimum 2-year follow-up data of an all-polyethylene, biconvex augmented anatomic glenoid component for correction of glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation.

METHODS

This study is a multicenter, retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients from 7 global clinical sites. All patients underwent aTSA using the biconvex posterior augmented glenoid (PAG). Inclusion criteria were preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan, minimum 2 years since surgery, preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative range of motion examination, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Glenoid classification, glenoid retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation were measured from preoperative CT and radiography and postoperative radiography. Statistical comparisons between pre- and postoperative values were performed with a paired t test.

RESULTS

Eighty-six of 110 consecutive patients during the study period (78% follow-up) met the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Mean follow-up was 35 ± 10 months, with a mean age of 68 ± 8 years (range 48-85). Range of motion statistically improved in all planes from pre- to postoperation. Mean visual analog scale score improved from 5.2 preoperation to 0.7 postoperation, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score from 43.2 to 89.5, Constant score from 41.8 to 76.9, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score from 49.8 to 86.7 (all P < .0001). Mean glenoid retroversion improved from 19.3° to 7.4° (P < .0001). Posterior subluxation improved from 69.1% to 53.5% and posterior decentering improved from 5.8% to -3.0% (P < .0001). There was 1 patient with both a prosthetic joint infection and radiographic glenoid loosening that required revision. Seventy-nine of 86 patients had a Lazarus score of 0 (no radiolucency seen about peg or keel) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that at minimum 2-year follow-up, a posterior-augmented all-polyethylene glenoid can correct glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation. Clinically, there was significant improvement in both range of motion and PROMs.

A 3-Dimensional Classification for Degenerative Glenohumeral Arthritis Based on Humeroscapular Alignment

Background

Seminal classifications of degenerative arthritis of the shoulder (DAS) describe either cuff tear arthropathy in the coronal plane or primary osteoarthritis in the cross-sectional plane. None consider a biplanar eccentricity.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to investigate humeroscapular alignment (HSA) of patients with DAS in both the anteroposterior (A-P) and superoinferior (S-I) planes on computed tomography (CT) after 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and develop a classification based on biplanar HSA in 9 quadrants. It was hypothesized that biplanar eccentricity would occur frequently.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The authors analyzed 130 CT scans of patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty. The glenoid center, trigonum, and inferior angle of the scapula were aligned in a single plane using 3D reconstruction software. Subluxation of the HSA was measured as the distance from the center of rotation of the humeral head to the scapular axis (line from trigonum through glenoid center) and was expressed as a percentage of the radius of the humeral head in both the A-P and the S-I directions. HSA was described in terms of A-P alignment first (posterior/central/anterior), then S-I alignment (superior/central/inferior), for a total of 9 different alignment combinations. Additionally, glenoid erosion was graded 1-3.

Results

Subluxation of the HSA was 74.1% posterior to 23.5% anterior in the A-P direction and 17.2% inferior to 68.6% superior in the S-I direction. A central HSA was calculated as between 20% posterior to 5% anterior (A-P) and 5% inferior to 20% superior (S-I), after a graphical analysis. Posterior subluxation >60% of the radius was labeled as extraposterior, and static acetabularization was labeled as extrasuperior. Overall, 21 patients had central-central, 40 centrosuperior, and 1 centroinferior alignment. Of 60 shoulders with posterior subluxation, alignment was posterocentral in 31, posterosuperior in 25, and posteroinferior in 5. There were 3 patients with anterocentral and 4 anterosuperior subluxation; in addition, 4 cases with extraposterior and 17 with extrasuperior subluxation were identified.

Conclusion

There was a high prevalence of biplanar eccentricity in DAS. The 3D classification system using combined HSA and glenoid erosion can be applied to describe DAS comprehensively.

Is there a correlation between humeral osteoarthritis and glenoid morphology according to Walch?

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between the grade of humeral osteoarthritis (OA) and the severity of glenoid morphology according to Walch. We hypothesized that there would be a correlation.

Methods

Overal, 143 shoulders in 135 patients (73 females, 62 males) undergoing shoulder arthroplasty surgery for primary glenohumeral OA were included consecutively. Mean age was 69.3 years (47 to 85). Humeral head (HH), osteophyte length (OL), and morphology (transverse decentering of the apex, transverse, or coronal asphericity) on radiographs were correlated to the glenoid morphology according to Walch (A1, A2, B1, B2, B3), glenoid retroversion, and humeral subluxation on CT images.

Results

Increased humeral OL correlated with a higher grade of glenoid morphology (A1-A2-B1-B2-B3) according to Walch (r = 0.672; p < 0.0001). It also correlated with glenoid retroversion (r = 0.707; p < 0.0001), and posterior humeral subluxation (r = 0.452; p < 0.0001). A higher humeral OL (odds ratio (OR) 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.32; p = 0.013), posterior humeral subluxation (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22; p = 0.031), and glenoid retroversion (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.68; p < 0.001) were independent factors for a higher glenoid morphology. More specifically, a humeral OL of ≥ 13 mm was indicative of eccentric glenoid types B2 and B3 (OR 14.20; 95% CI 5.96 to 33.85). Presence of an aspherical HH in the coronal plane was suggestive of glenoid types B2 and B3 (OR 3.34; 95% CI 1.67 to 6.68).

Conclusion

The criteria of humeral OL and HH morphology are associated with increasing glenoid retroversion, posterior humeral subluxation, and eccentric glenoid wear. Therefore, humeral radiological parameters might hint at the morphology on the glenoid side.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):463–469.

[3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery]

The 3D printing technology is a relatively new procedure with a high potential, especially in the field of shoulder surgery. The 3D printing procedures are increasingly being developed and also gaining new users. Principally, 3D printing procedures can be applied preoperatively in planning the surgical procedure, patient clarification and in teaching; however, the technology is increasing being used intraoperatively. In addition to intraoperative visualization of the models, 3D printing permits the use of individual and specific instruments and implants. This allows the precise transfer of the preoperative planning to the surgical procedure. Inaccuracies are mainly caused by soft tissues. The 3D printing can be beneficial in the fields of arthroplasty, shoulder instability as well as orthopedic trauma. The literature shows promising results in relation to duration of surgery, blood loss and clinical results of the procedure. On the other hand, it is still unclear which indications warrant the use of 3D printing. Other aspects that raise questions are the time of planning, the production time and the additional cost that the use of 3D printing entails. Nonetheless, 3D printing represents a meaningful enhancement of the portfolio of surgeons, which becomes highly beneficial and useful in complex situations. Furthermore, this procedure enables a certain amount of flexibility when reacting to certain circumstances.

Walch B2 glenoids. 2D vs 3D comparison of humeral head subluxation and glenoid retroversion

Background

The posterior subluxation and glenoid version in Walch B2 glenoids are routinely assessed by 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT). Different methods of calculation are used to analyze these parameters. Alternatively, the rising use of 3-dimensional (3D) planification tools in arthroplasty requires the clarification if the 3D measurements are equivalent to 2D. The aim of this study was to compare B2 glenoids characteristics between 2D CT assessment method and 3D automated software method.

Methods

CT scans from patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty were identified. In the 2D method, measurement of glenoid version was determined. Measurement of the humeral head subluxation (HHS) (scapula axis method) was determined by the percentage of the humeral head posterior to the Friedman line (scapula axis). Three-dimensional analysis allowed an automated segmentation of the humerus and scapula, definition of scapular planes, and determination of glenoid version and HHS.

Results

Fifty-one CT scans met inclusion criteria. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the 2D retroversion (RV) and 2D HHS intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient>0.9).The median RV was 16° [12-20] in 2D and 19° [16-23] in 3D (P < .0001). The median subluxation was 71% [66-75] in 2D and 81% [78-86] in 3D (P < .0001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated low positive correlation between RV and subluxation in 2D and 3D (R² = 0.31 and R² = 0.23, respectively).

Discussion/Conclusion

The assessment of version and HHS in Walch B2 glenoids between 2D CT and a 3D planification were significantly different. Low correlation between RV and HHS was observed (2D and 3D assessment).

Imbalance in Axial-plane Rotator Cuff Fatty Infiltration in Posteriorly Worn Glenoids in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: An MRI-based Study

BACKGROUND

Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff evaluated with CT has been associated with asymmetric glenoid wear and humeral head subluxation in patients with glenohumeral arthritis. The relationship between rotator cuff pathologic findings and abnormal glenoid wear plays an important role in determining the optimal surgical management of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Compared with CT, MRI has increased sensitivity for identifying rotator cuff conditions; therefore, prior studies using CT may have underestimated the association between fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff and abnormal glenoid wear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Compared with Type A glenoids, which muscles in which Walch subtypes have a greater degree of fatty infiltration using Goutallier scores? (2) What glenoid type is associated with greater imbalance in fatty infiltration, as measured by comparing Goutallier scores between the posterior and anterior rotator cuff muscles? (3) What is the correlation between glenoid version and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles? (4) Comparing Type B2 and B3 glenoids with Type A glenoids, after accounting for age and sex, is there an increase in fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle?

METHODS

A total of 129 shoulders from 129 patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to treat primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients had an average age of 66.4 ± 9.3 years and an average BMI of 30.6 ± 6.7 kg/m2, and 53% (69 of 129) were men. All patients underwent MRI within 12 months before total shoulder arthroplasty to assess glenoid morphology and rotator cuff pathologic findings. Three reviewers assessed the images, and glenoid morphology was assigned using the modified Walch classification system (Types A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C, and D). Fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff was classified using Goutallier scores. The examiners demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability using these classification systems; the Walch classification system had interrater reliability kappa coefficients (κ) from 0.54 to 0.69 and intrarater reliability κ from 0.60 to 0.64. Goutallier scores using the simplified classification system had interrater reliability κ from 0.64 to 0.68 and intrarater reliability κ from 0.64 to 0.79. Thirty-six percent (46 of 129) of the shoulders had posterior wear patterns (18% [23] were Type B2 glenoids; 18% [23] were Type B3 glenoids). The average Goutallier scores for each rotator cuff muscle were determined, and the amount of fatty infiltration was compared between the various Walch subtypes using independent t-tests. Axial-plane imbalance in fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff was assessed by determining the difference in the average fatty infiltration of the posterior rotator cuff muscles (infraspinatus and teres minor) and anterior rotator cuff muscles (subscapularis) and comparing the differences among the Walch subtypes using independent t-tests. The association between glenoid version and fatty infiltration was assessed using Pearson correlations. Finally, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff among the various Walch subtypes while accounting for patient age and sex.

RESULTS

Compared with Type A1 glenoids, Type B2 and B3 glenoids had an increased amount of fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus (1.6 ± 0.7 versus 0.7 ± 0.4; mean difference 0.9 [95% CI 0.7-1.2]; p < 0.001 and 1.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.7 ± 0.4; mean difference 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.4]; p < 0.001, respectively) and teres minor (1.3 ± 0.7 versus 0.6 ± 0.5; mean difference 0.7 [95% CI 0.4-1.0]; p < 0.001 and 1.6 ± 0.6 versus 0.6 ± 0.5; mean difference 1.0 [95% CI 0.7-1.2]; p < 0.001, respectively). There was greater imbalance in fatty infiltration between the posterior and anterior rotator cuff muscles for Type B2 (0.5 ± 0.3) and B3 (0.6 ± 0.5) glenoids than for Type A1 (0.1 ± 0.3) and A2 (0.1 ± 0.6) glenoids (p < 0.001). Only the infraspinatus's fatty infiltration was strongly correlated with glenoid version (r = 0.64; p < 0.001), while fatty infiltration of the other muscles only correlated weakly or moderately. After accounting for age and sex, fatty infiltration in the infraspinatus was associated with Type B2 (OR 66.1 [95% CI 7.6-577.9]; p < 0.001) and Type B3 glenoids (OR 59.5 [95% CI 5.4-661.3]; p < 0.001) compared with Type A glenoids.

CONCLUSION

Compared with concentric wear, posteriorly worn glenoids had an imbalance in axial-plane rotator cuff fatty infiltration and an increased amount of fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and teres minor compared with the subscapularis. These imbalances may contribute to the higher rates of failure after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with posterior wear compared with those with concentric wear. Future research should be directed toward investigating the temporal relationship of these findings, as well as understanding the clinical outcomes for patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty who have posteriorly worn glenoids with a high degree of fatty infiltration of the posterior rotator cuff musculature.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Providers should consider the increased likelihood of higher-grade fatty infiltration of the posterior rotator cuff in the setting of posteriorly worn glenoids, particularly when treating patients without using MRI. These patients have higher rates of failure postoperatively and may benefit from closer monitoring and altered postoperative rehabilitation protocols that target the posterior rotator cuff.

Stepped Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for B2 and B3 Glenoid Pathology: A Study of Early Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Posterior glenoid bone loss is commonly associated with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Surgical management of bone loss in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains controversial. We studied the use of a stepped augmented glenoid component for management of Walch B2 and B3 glenoids and compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up with those achieved with a non-augmented component of the same design in Walch A1 glenoids.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients (42 A1, 29 B2, and 21 B3 glenoids) were prospectively followed after aTSA. Sequential 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed preoperatively, within 3 months postoperatively with metal artifact reduction (MAR) to define implant position, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively with MAR. Scapular 3D registration with implant registration allowed 3D measurement of glenoid implant position, implant shift, and central peg osteolysis (CPO).

RESULTS

CPO with or without implant shift occurred in a higher percentage of B3 glenoids treated with the augmented glenoid component (29%) than A1 glenoids treated with a standard component (5%) (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the frequency of CPO between B2 glenoids with the augmented component (10%) and A1 glenoids with the standard component. There was no difference in postoperative glenoid component version and inclination between groups. B3 glenoids were associated with more component medialization relative to the premorbid joint line compared with A1 and B2 glenoids (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A stepped augmented glenoid component can restore premorbid glenoid anatomy in patients with asymmetric biconcave glenoid bone loss (Walch B2), with short-term clinical and radiographic results equivalent to those for patients without glenoid bone loss (Walch A1) treated with a non-augmented component. There is a greater risk of CPO in patients with moderate-to-severe B3 glenoid pathology with this stepped augmented glenoid component. Longer follow-up will help define the clinical implications of CPO over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Teres minor muscle hypertrophy is a negative predictor of outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative implant position

BACKGROUND

Predictors of outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of preoperative muscle quality and postoperative implant positioning on patient-reported outcomes following rTSA.

METHODS

We evaluated 88 shoulders treated with rTSA in which preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was available. Preoperative muscle quality was evaluated, including fatty infiltration, rotator cuff muscle volume, and total tear size. Postoperative implant position was determined radiographically. The correlation between imaging parameters and the 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was examined. Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors including patient demographic characteristics and implant position.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that the ASES score was significantly lower in patients with teres minor muscle hypertrophy relative to those with normal muscle (73.3 ± 22.8 vs. 84.2 ± 16.9, P = .02). The functional subscore was significantly lower in patients with grade 2 fatty infiltration of the deltoid muscle relative to those with grade 0 fatty infiltration (26.1 ± 14.6 vs. 34.8 ± 11.6, P = .03). Older age was associated with a higher pain subscore (ρ = 0.32, P = .002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that teres minor muscle hypertrophy remained a significant independent predictor of the ASES score (β coefficient = 91.3, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Teres minor muscle hypertrophy is an independent negative predictor of patient-reported outcomes after rTSA.

The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Little information exists regarding the benefit of computer navigation in shoulder arthroplasty in the clinical setting. This study aimed to quantify how computer navigation affects the number and length of screws used during in vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) placement.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a research database to identify patients who underwent primary RSA before and after the use of computer navigation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. One hundred consecutive RSAs were selected from the computer navigation implantation date; then, 100 consecutive sex-matched RSAs were chosen prior to navigation implantation in reverse chronologic order. Baseplate augmentations were chosen based on surgeon discretion, with the goal of restoring version to within 10° of neutral and inclination to neutral or slightly inferior with removal of the smallest amount of subchondral bone possible. Screws were placed with the goal of ≥3 screws with good purchase and were added as needed, with up to 5 screws used. We compared demographic factors, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, number of screws, screw length, number of wasted screws, and number of cases with bone graft used behind the baseplate between the 2 groups. We used the χ² test for bivariate analysis and the Student t test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 200 RSAs were included, with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.3 years) performed prior to computer navigation compared with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.7 years) performed using computer navigation. The total number of screws used in RSAs without computer navigation was 414; the total used in the computer navigation cases was 344. RSAs placed with computer navigation used significantly fewer screws per case (3.4 screws vs. 4.1 screws, P < .001) and had a significantly greater average screw length (35.0 mm vs. 32.6 mm, P < .001). Three screws were implanted in 61% of computer navigation cases vs. 1% of cases without computer navigation (P < .001). Screws ≥ 30 mm in length were more commonly used in patients undergoing RSA using computer navigation (84.6% vs. 73.7%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that computer navigation in RSA leads to longer and fewer glenoid baseplate screws being implanted. Computer navigation appears to assist with better screw placement, which may have similar clinical benefits of better glenoid fixation. Additionally, using fewer screws can save glenoid bone stock, avoid added glenoid stress risers, and decrease operative time.

Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics.With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening.The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis.The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont's reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm.More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014.

Identification of threshold pathoanatomic metrics in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

An assessment of the pathoanatomic parameters of the arthritic glenohumeral joint (GHJ) has the potential to identify discriminating metrics to differentiate glenoid types in shoulders with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHOA). The aim was to identify the morphometric differences and threshold values between glenoid types including normal and arthritic glenoids with the various types in the Walch classification. We hypothesized that there would be clear morphometric discriminators between the various glenoid types and that specific numeric threshold values would allow identification of each glenoid type.

METHODS

The computed tomography scans of 707 shoulders were analyzed: 585 obtained from shoulders with PGHOA and 122 from shoulders without glenohumeral pathology. Glenoid morphology was classified according to the Walch classification. All computed tomography scans were imported in a dedicated automatic 3D-software program that referenced measurements to the scapular body plane. Glenoid and humeral modeling was performed using the best-fit sphere method, and the root-mean-square error was calculated. The direction and orientation of the glenoid and humerus described glenohumeral relationships.

RESULTS

Among shoulders with PGHOA, 90% of the glenoids and 85% of the humeral heads were directed posteriorly in reference to the scapular body plane. Several discriminatory pathoanatomic parameters were identified: GHJ narrowing < 3 mm was a discriminatory metric for type A glenoids. Posterior humeral subluxation > 70% discriminated type B1 from normal GHJs. The root-mean-square error was a discriminatory metric to distinguish type B2 from type A, type B3, and normal GHJs. Type B3 glenoids differed from type A2 by greater retroversion (>13°) and subluxation (>71%). The type C glenoid retroversion inferior limit was 21°, whereas normal glenoids never presented with retroversion > 16°.

CONCLUSION

Pathoanatomic metrics with the identified threshold values can be used to discriminate glenoid types in shoulders with PGHOA.

Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Glenoid Implants in Shoulder Arthroplasty

»

Glenoid component positioning affects implant survival after total shoulder arthroplasty, and accurate glenoid-component positioning is an important technical aspect.

»

The use of virtual planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to produce reliable implant placement in the laboratory and in some clinical studies.

»

Currently available preoperative planning software programs employ different techniques to generate 3-dimensional models and produce anatomic measurements potentially affecting clinical decisions.

»

There are no published data, to our knowledge, on the effect of preoperative computer planning and patient-specific instrumentation on long-term clinical outcomes.

Subluxation in the Arthritic Shoulder

»

The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT).

»

Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion.

»

The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation.

»

Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.

Determination of predisposing scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model-Part II: shoulder osteoarthritis

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

Shoulder osteoarthritis can be divided into different glenoid types (A, B, C, and D) and subtypes. The aim of this study was to investigate if there is an association between the prearthropathy scapular anatomy, shoulder osteoarthritis, and different glenoid types and subtypes.

METHODS

Using principal components analysis, a statistical shape model (SSM) of the scapula was constructed from a data set of 110 computed tomographic (CT) scans. These subjects formed the control group. Next, CT scan images of 117 patients with osteoarthritis were classified according to the modified Walch classification. A complete 3-dimensional (3D) scapular bone model was created for every patient, and using the SSM, a reconstruction of their prearthropathy scapular anatomy was performed. Automated 3D measurements were performed in both the patient and control group to obtain glenoid version and inclination, critical shoulder angle (CSA), posterior acromial slope (PAS), lateral acromion angle, scapular offset, and the rotational alignment of the coracoacromial complex. These parameters were compared between controls, patients with osteoarthritis, and glenoid types and subtypes.

RESULTS

Mean version and inclination for the control group was 6° retroversion and 8° superior inclination (both SD 4°). The mean CSA, PAS, coracoid-posterior acromion angle, posterior acromion-scapular plane angle, and fulcrum axis ratio were 30° (SD 4°), 64° (SD 8°), 116° (SD 9°), 55° (SD 7°), and 46% (SD 4%), respectively. Patients with osteoarthritis had a significant lower CSA, posterior acromion-scapular plane angle, coracoid-posterior acromion angle, and fulcrum axis ratio (27°, 50°, 111°, and 44%, all P < .001). We found a significant difference between the control group and the respective glenoid types for the following parameters: mean CSA and coracoid-posterior acromion angle for A glenoids (27°, P = .001, and 111°, P = .007); mean version, CSA, PAS, coracoid-posterior acromion angle, posterior acromion-scapular plane angle, and fulcrum axis ratio for B glenoids (11°, 27°, 71°, 111°, 49°, and 43%, all P < .001); and mean version, CSA, and posterior acromion-scapular plane angle for D glenoids (2°, P = .002, 26°, P = .003, and 48°, P = .007).

DISCUSSION

There seems to be an association between prearthropathy scapular anatomy and shoulder osteoarthritis. A small lateral extension and less posterior rotation of the acromion is associated with shoulder osteoarthritis and is present in almost all types and subtypes of glenoid morphology. Furthermore, B and D glenoids are associated with, respectively, a more and less pronounced prearthropathy glenoid retroversion.

Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenoid component position and radiolucency following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) analysis.

METHODS

In a series of 152 patients (42 Walch A1, 16 A2, 7 B1, 49 B2, 29 B3, 3 C1, 3 C2, and 3 D glenoids) undergoing anatomic TSA with a polyethylene glenoid component, sequential 3D CT analysis was performed preoperatively (CT1), early postoperatively (CT2), and at a minimum 2-year follow-up (CT3). Glenoid component shift was defined as a change in component version or inclination of ≥3° from CT2 to CT3. Glenoid component central anchor peg osteolysis (CPO) was assessed at CT3. Factors associated with glenoid component shift and CPO were evaluated.

RESULTS

Glenoid component shift occurred from CT2 to CT3 in 78 (51%) of the 152 patients. CPO was seen at CT3 in 19 (13%) of the 152 patients, including 15 (19%) of the 78 with component shift. Walch B2 glenoids with a standard component and glenoids with higher preoperative retroversion were associated with a higher rate of shift, but not of CPO. B3 glenoids with an augmented component and glenoids with greater preoperative joint-line medialization were associated with CPO, but not with shift. More glenoid component joint-line medialization from CT2 to CT3 was associated with higher rates of shift and CPO. A greater absolute change in glenoid component inclination from CT2 to CT3 and a combined absolute glenoid component version and inclination change from CT2 to CT3 were associated with CPO. Neither glenoid component shift nor CPO was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative 3D CT analysis demonstrated that glenoid component shift commonly occurs following anatomic TSA, with increased inclination the most common direction. Most (81%) of the patients with glenoid component shift did not develop CPO. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the relationships of glenoid component shift and CPO with loosening over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How to Measure Glenoid Bone Stock and Version and Why It Is Important: A Practical Guide

Shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating condition and a source of high morbidity and medical expenditures across the world among individuals older than 60 years. Shoulder OA results in the gradual destruction of articular cartilage of the humeral head and glenoid component, causing inflammation, pain, and a restricted range of motion. Most patients are diagnosed with shoulder OA after experiencing shoulder pain and stiffness, and the diagnosis is often made after medical and physical histories are obtained and physical and imaging examinations are performed. Use of various surgical techniques such as total anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty has increased in recent years, resulting in reduced morbidity and improved functional status of patients. However, the rate of surgical complications such as premature loosening of components is significant, reducing the effectiveness of such procedures. Data in the literature indicate that high-grade fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle before surgery is associated with postoperative glenoid component loosening. High-grade rotator cuff fatty infiltration and atrophy have been found to be associated with more severe Walch classification-based glenoid morphology subtypes, increased joint line medialization, glenoid bone loss, and increased pathologic glenoid version. The authors describe how advanced imaging techniques are used for preoperative evaluation of the shoulder and discuss how to measure glenoid version and bone stock and classify glenoid morphology types on the basis of Walch classification, as these parameters are commonly used in surgical planning. Methods involving the use of Friedman and paleoglenoid lines for respective measurements are illustrated by using three-dimensional CT and MRI case examples. ^©RSNA, 2020.

The Evolution of the Walch Classification for Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis

Our understanding of the pathology of and treatment for glenohumeral arthritis (GHA) has grown dramatically in the past few decades. Original observations regarding patterns of glenoid erosion, glenoid retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation in patients with primary GHA were documented in the 1980s and early 1990s. In the late 1990s, Walch et al proposed what is now the most widely used classification system to describe the characteristic pathology of GHA. Improved understanding of both premorbid and pathologic anatomies, along with advancements in imaging, have steered modifications in this classification system. These changes have improved its reliability and helped to further guide management decisions. The purpose of this article is to review the evolution of the Walch classification, understand the rationale behind the modifications, and discuss potential future developments.

Assessing the Value to the Patient of New Technologies in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Publications regarding anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) have consistently reported that they provide significant improvement for patients with glenohumeral arthritis. New TSA technologies that have been introduced with the goal of further improving these outcomes include preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, 3-dimensional preoperative planning, patient-specific instrumentation, stemless and short-stemmed humeral components, as well as metal-backed, hybrid, and augmented glenoid components. The benefit of these new technologies in terms of patient-reported outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed 114 articles presenting preoperative and postoperative values for commonly used patient-reported metrics. The results were analyzed to determine whether patient outcomes have improved over the 20 years during which new technologies became available.

RESULTS

The analysis did not identify evidence that the results of TSA were statistically or clinically improved over the 2 decades of study or that any of the individual technologies were associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional research is required to document the clinical value of these new technologies to patients with glenohumeral arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ricchetti ET, Khazzam MS, Denard PJ, Dines DM, Bradley Edwards T, Entezari V, Friedman RJ, Garrigues GE, Gillespie RJ, Grawe BM, Green A, Hatzidakis AM, Gabriel Horneff J, Hsu JE, Jawa A, Jin Y, Johnston PS, Jun BJ, Keener JD, Kelly JD, Kwon YW, Miniaci A, Morris BJ, Namdari S, Spencer EE, Strnad G, Williams GR, Iannotti JP. Reliability of the modified Walch classification for advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis: a study of the ASES B2 Glenoid Multicenter Research Group

BACKGROUND

Variations in glenoid morphology affect surgical treatment and outcome of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging in a multicenter research group.

METHODS

Deidentified preoperative CTs of patients with primary glenohumeral OA undergoing anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) were reviewed with 3D imaging software by 23 experienced shoulder surgeons across 19 institutions. CTs were separated into 2 groups for review: group 1 (96 cases involving all modified Walch classification categories evaluated by 12 readers) and group 2 (98 cases involving posterior glenoid deformity categories [B2, B3, C1, C2] evaluated by 11 readers other than the first 12). Each case group was reviewed by the same set of readers 4 different times (with and without the glenoid vault model present), blindly and in random order. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated to assess agreement (slight, fair, moderate, substantial, almost perfect) within groups and by modified Walch classification categories.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability showed fair to moderate agreement for both groups. Group 1 had a kappa of 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38, 0.48) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.46) with it present. Group 2 had a kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.43) with the glenoid vault model absent and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.43) with it present. Intraobserver reliability showed substantial agreement for group 1 with (0.63, range 0.47-0.71) and without (0.61, range 0.52-0.69) the glenoid vault model present. For group 2, intraobserver reliability showed moderate agreement with the glenoid vault model absent (0.51, range 0.30-0.72), which improved to substantial agreement with the glenoid vault model present (0.61, range 0.34-0.87).

DISCUSSION

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the modified Walch classification were fair to moderate and moderate to substantial, respectively, using standardized 3D CT imaging analysis in a large multicenter study. The findings potentially suggest that cases with a spectrum of posterior glenoid bone loss and/or dysplasia can be harder to distinguish by modified Walch type because of a lack of defined thresholds, and the glenoid vault model may be beneficial in determining Walch type in certain scenarios. The ability to reproducibly separate patients into groups based on preoperative pathology, including Walch type, is important for future studies to accurately evaluate postoperative outcomes in TSA patient cohorts.

Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of pathologic correction in total shoulder arthroplasty based on severity of preoperative pathology

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify correction of glenoid deformity and humeral head alignment in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty as a function of preoperative pathology (modified Walch classification) and glenoid implant type in a clinical cohort using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a standard glenoid (SG) (n = 110) or posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid (AG) (n = 62) component were evaluated with a preoperative CT scan and a postoperative CT scan within 3 months of surgery. Glenoid version, inclination, and medial-lateral (ML) joint line position, as well as humeral head alignment, were assessed on both CT scans, with preoperative-to-postoperative changes analyzed relative to pathology and premorbid anatomy based on the modified Walch classification and glenoid implant type.

RESULTS

On average, correction to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type A2 glenoids than in type A1 glenoids (-2.3 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B2 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-1.7° ± 6.6° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .57), and the premorbid ML joint line position was restored on average in both groups (0.3 ± 1.6 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P = .006). Correction to premorbid version was not different between type B3 glenoids with AG components and type A1 glenoids with SG components (-0.6° ± 5.1° vs. -1.0° ± 4.0°, P = .72), but correction relative to the premorbid ML joint line position was significantly less in type B3 glenoids with AG components than in type A1 glenoids with SG components (-2.2 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Postoperative humeral glenoid alignment was not different in any group comparisons.

DISCUSSION

In cases with posterior glenoid bone loss and retroversion (type B2 or B3 glenoids), an AG component can better correct retroversion and the glenoid ML joint line position compared with an SG component, with correction to premorbid version comparable to a type A1 glenoid with an SG component. However, restoration of the premorbid ML joint line position may not always be possible with SG or AG components in cases with more advanced central glenoid bone loss (type A2 or B3 glenoids). Further follow-up is needed to determine the clinical consequences of these findings.

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with All-Polyethylene Glenoid Component for Primary Osteoarthritis with Glenoid Deficiencies

This study evaluated the ability of shoulder arthroplasty using a standard glenoid component to improve patient self-assessed comfort and function and to correct preoperative humeral-head decentering on the face of the glenoid in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis and type-B2 or B3 glenoids.

The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The success of shoulder arthroplasty, both reverse and anatomical, depends on correcting the underlying glenoid deformity especially in patients with an osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that the distribution of glenoid version and especially inclination are underestimated in the shoulder arthritis population, and also that superior glenoid inclination can be detected through 3-dimensional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT) to a greater proportion in patients with rotator cuff insufficiency, but also in patients with osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. Because of the influence of rotator cuff imbalance on secondary glenoid wear the values of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) and the fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff are further analyzed. The aim of our study is to determine; 1) the distribution of glenoid inclination and version; 2) the relationship between glenoid inclination, version, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) to the status of the rotator cuff; 3) the proportion of patients with both an intact rotator cuff and a superior inclination greater than 10°.

METHODS

A total of 231 shoulders were evaluated with X-ray images, 3-dimentional (3D) software program of computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to their inclination angles and also grouped as intact-rotator cuff and torn-cuff group.

RESULTS

The median (min/max) values for the 231 shoulders were 8° (- 23°/56°) for the inclination angle, - 11°(- 55°/23°) for the version angle, and 31.5°(17.6°/61.6°) for the CSA. The majority of the glenoids were found to show posterior-superior erosion. Glenoid inclination angle and CSA were significantly higher in torn-cuff group when compared with intact-cuff group (P < 0.001, both). The rotator cuff tears were statistically significant in high inclination group than low inclination group and no inclination group (p < 0.001). In the high inclination group, 41 of 105 (39%) shoulders had an intact rotator cuff, in about 18% of all shoulders.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that 3D evaluation of glenoid inclination is mandatory for preoperative planning of shoulder replacement in order to properly assess superior inclination and that reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be considered more frequently than as previously expected, even when the rotator cuff is intact.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

3D printing in shoulder surgery

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a novel modality with the potential to make a huge impact in the surgical field. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview on the current use of 3D printing in shoulder surgery. We have reviewed the use of this new method in 3 fields of shoulder surgery: shoulder arthroplasty, recurrent shoulder instability and orthopedic shoulder traumatology. In shoulder arthroplasty, several authors have shown that the use of the 3D printer improves the positioning of the glenoid component, even if longer clinical follow-up is needed to determine whether the cost of this system rationalizes the potential improved functional outcomes and decreases glenoid revision rates. In the treatment of anterior shoulder instability, the literature agrees on the fact that the use of the 3D printing can: enhance the dept and size of bony lesions, allowing a patient tailored surgical planning and potentially reducing operative times; allow the production of personalized implants to restore substantial bone loss; restore glenohumeral morphology and instability. In orthopedic trauma, the use of 3D printing can be helpful to increase the understanding of fracture patterns, facilitating a more personalized planning, and can be used for resident training and education. We can conclude the current literature regarding the use of 3D printed models in orthopedic surgery agrees finding objective improvements to preoperative planning and to the surgical procedure itself, by shortening the intraoperative time and by the possibility to develop custom-made, patient-specific surgical instruments, and it suggests that there are tangible benefits for its implementation.

Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review

Preoperative assessment of the glenoid in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty is critical to account for variations in glenoid morphology, wear, version, inclination, and glenohumeral subluxation.

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scan assessment of the morphology of glenoid erosion allows for a more accurate surgical decision-making process to correct deformity and restore the joint line.

Newer technology has brought forth computer-assisted software for glenoid planning in shoulder arthroplasty and patient-specific instrumentation.

There have been promising early findings, although further evaluation is needed to determine how this technology impacts implant survivorship, function, and patient-reported outcomes.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:126-137. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190011

Normal and Pathoanatomy of the Arthritic Shoulder: Considerations for Shoulder Arthroplasty

The glenohumeral joint is a highly mobile, complex articulation that relies not only on the bony support between the humeral head and glenoid but also on appropriate balance and tension of the surrounding soft-tissue structures. Recreating the normal anatomic relationships is a basic premise in joint arthroplasty, which can be challenging in shoulder arthroplasty, as the normal glenohumeral anatomy has considerable variation from patient to patient. Also, as the anatomy of the glenohumeral joint becomes distorted with advanced shoulder pathology, it becomes a challenge to return the shoulder to its premorbid anatomic state. Failure to restore normal anatomic parameters after shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to have deleterious effects on postoperative function and implant survival. As the recognition of this has grown, shoulder prostheses have evolved to allow for considerable more variation in an attempt to recreate patient-specific anatomy. However, understanding the progression of shoulder pathology to better predict the patient's premorbid anatomy remains limited. A thorough understanding of the premorbid and pathologic anatomy of the glenohumeral joint will aid in preoperative planning and intraoperative execution and lead to a more predictable reconstruction of the shoulder, which is critical for a successful outcome after shoulder arthroplasty.

Prearthroplasty glenohumeral pathoanatomy and its relationship to patient's sex, age, diagnosis, and self-assessed shoulder comfort and function

BACKGROUND

There is great current interest in characterizing the prearthroplasty glenohumeral pathoanatomy because of its role in guiding surgical technique and its possible effects on arthroplasty outcome.

METHODS

We examined 544 patients within 6 weeks before arthroplasty with the goals of characterizing the following: demographic and radiographic characteristics; relationships of the radiographic pathoanatomy to the patient's age, sex, and diagnosis; inter-relationships among glenoid type, glenoid version, and amount of decentering of the humeral head on the glenoid; and relationships of the pathoanatomy to the patient's self-assessed comfort and function.

RESULTS

Male patients had a higher frequency of B2 glenoids and a lower frequency of A2 glenoids. The arthritic shoulders of men were more retroverted and had greater amounts of posterior decentering. Patients with types A1 and C glenoids were younger than those with other glenoid types. Shoulders with osteoarthritis were more likely to be type B2 and to be retroverted. Types B2 and C had the greatest degree of retroversion, whereas types B1 and B2 had the greatest amounts of posterior decentering. Shoulders with glenoid types B1 and B2 and those with more decentering did not have worse self-assessed shoulder comfort and function.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenohumeral pathoanatomy was found to have previously unreported relationships to the patient's sex, age, and diagnosis. Contrary to what might have been expected, more advanced glenohumeral pathoanatomy (ie, type B glenoids, greater retroversion, greater decentering) was not associated with worse self-assessed shoulder comfort and function.

Autografting for B2 Glenoids

The Walch B2 glenoid is characterized by a biconcave glenoid deformity, acquired glenoid retroversion, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Surgical reconstruction of the B2 glenoid is often challenging due to the complexity of the deformity. Bone graft augmentation using humeral head autograft is a valuable adjunct to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the B2 glenoid, particularly in the young, highly active patient with severe glenoid retroversion (>25°–30°). Although this technique affords the ability to correct glenoid version and simultaneously enhances glenoid bone stock, it is technically challenging. The potential for graft-related complications also exists, which may further impact glenoid implant longevity and functional outcome. This review article aims to describe the B2 glenoid morphology, discuss the challenges in managing the B2 deformity, and provide further insight specifically regarding autografting at the time of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of the B2 glenoid.

Imaging of the B2 Glenoid: An Assessment of Glenoid Wear

Background

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) carries a spectrum of morphology and wear patterns of the glenoid surface exemplified by complex patterns such as glenoid biconcavity and acquired retroversion seen in the B2 glenoid. Multiple imaging methods are available for evaluation of the complex glenoid structure seen in B2 glenoids. The purpose of this article is to review imaging assessment of the type B2 glenoid.

Methods

The current literature on imaging of the B2 glenoid was reviewed to describe the unique anatomy of this OA variant and how to appropriately assess its characteristics.

Results

Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and standard 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) have all shown acceptable assessments of arthritic glenoids but lack the detailed and highly accurate evaluation of bone loss and retroversion seen with 3-dimensional CT.

Conclusion

Accurate preoperative identification of complex B2 pathology on imaging remains essential in planning and achieving precise implant placement at the time of shoulder arthroplasty.

Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Use of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA among different types of instrumentation used with the 3D CT preoperative planning.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-three patients with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in 3 prospective studies evaluating patient-specific instrumentation and 3D preoperative planning. All patients underwent preoperative 3D CT planning to determine optimal glenoid component and guide pin position based on surgeon preference. Patients were placed into 1 of 5 instrument groups used for intraoperative guide pin placement: (1) standard instrumentation, (2) standard instrumentation combined with use of a 3D glenoid bone model containing the guide pin, (3) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with single-use patient-specific instrumentation, (4) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with reusable patient-specific instrumentation, and (5) use of reusable patient-specific instrumentation with an adjustable, reusable base. Postoperatively, all patients underwent 3D CT to compare actual versus planned glenoid component position. Deviation from the plan (in terms of orientation and location) was compared across groups on the basis of absolute differences and outlier analysis. Univariable and multivariable comparisons were performed. As the initial analyses showed no significant differences in preoperative factors or in deviation from the plan between Groups 1 and 2 or between Groups 4 and 5 across studies, the final analysis was across 3 major treatment groups: standard instrumentation (Groups 1 and 2), single-use patient-specific instrumentation (Group 3), and reusable patient-specific instrumentation (Groups 4 and 5).

RESULTS

In nearly all comparisons, there were no significant differences in the deviation from the plan (absolute differences or outlier frequency) for glenoid implant orientation or location across the 3 major treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate that any type of patient-specific instrumentation resulted in consistent differences in accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA with 3D CT preoperative planning. Surgeons have multiple patient-specific instrumentation options available for improving accuracy of glenoid implant placement when compared with 2D imaging without patient-specific instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: review of available implants and current literature

Glenoid bone loss and retroversion increase the complexity of primary shoulder arthroplasty and affect the outcome. Although eccentric reaming, augmented glenoid implants, bone grafting, and reverse arthroplasty have been used to manage bone loss and retroversion, there is no consensus on treatment. Posteriorly augmented glenoid components can correct retroversion and avoid joint line medialization, which occurs with corrective reaming techniques. Full-wedged, half-wedged, and stepped polyethylene posteriorly augmented designs are currently available for use in the United States. The results of biomechanical and computer model studies support the use of augmented implants for the management of glenoid retroversion of greater than 15°. Currently, most clinical studies are retrospective case series. The short-term results of posteriorly augmented glenoid components are successful, with no clear evidence of the superiority of one design over another and unknown long-term survival rates.

Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System

BACKGROUND

Humeral bone loss is commonly encountered during revision shoulder arthroplasty and anticipating humeral bone defects can help the revision surgeon make appropriate plans to achieve adequate fixation and stability. No validated classification system exists to characterize humeral bone loss in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to create a classification system for humeral bone loss in revision shoulder arthroplasty; (2) to determine the classification system's reliability; and (3) to determine whether humeral bone loss type is associated with intraoperative humeral-related reconstruction characteristics.

METHODS

This was a comparative retrospective radiographic study. First, six surgeons from five centers collaborated to create a classification by consensus. Second, two surgeons from two other centers who had fellowship training in shoulder and elbow surgery, who were blinded to each other's grades and all patient details other than plain radiographs, and who were not involved in creation of the system, classified true AP, AP, and lateral (axillary and/or scapular-Y) radiographs from 108 revision (413 radiographs) from one center that were performed between November 15, 2006, and January 4, 2018. Interobserver reliability was calculated by comparing those two reviews and determining Cohen's κ. In addition, one reviewer repeated his assessments twice, 4 months apart, to determine intraobserver reliability using Cohen's κ. Third, we performed a retrospective chart study of these same revisions to determine intraoperative humeral-related reconstruction characteristics such as the use of greater tuberosity fixation, stem length, humeral bone grafting, and the use of proximal humeral replacement or total humeral replacement; at the center where these revisions were performed during that timespan, no attempt to classify bone loss was made. During that period, the general indications for greater tuberosity fixation included the absence of a stable osseous connection between the greater tuberosity and the shaft of the humerus with a tuberosity amendable to repair; the general indications for use of longer stems were inability to obtain a minimum of two cortical widths of overlap between the implant and the humeral diaphysis and/or loss of the greater tuberosity; and the general indications for proximal and total humeral replacement were bone loss that was felt to be too severe to allow reconstruction with allograft.

RESULTS

The classification system consists of three types of humeral bone loss: Type 1 is loss of the epiphysis with subtypes for loss of the calcar and loss of the greater tuberosity; Type 2 is loss of the metadiaphysis above the deltoid attachment with a subtype for cortical thinning; and Type 3 is bone loss extending below the deltoid attachment with a subtype for cortical thinning. We studied 108 revisions: 38 (35%) without bone loss, 34 (31%) Type 1, 27 (25%) Type 2, and nine (8%) Type 3. For reliability, interrater κ was 0.545 and in 71% (77 of 108) of revisions, the two raters agreed on a numeric type. Intrarater κ was 0.615 and in 77% (83 of 108) of revisions, the rater agreed with himself as to the numeric type. Stem length increased with class type (Type 1 median [range] 130 [70-210], Type 2 150 [70-210], Type 3 190 [70-240], p = 0.005). Most greater tuberosity fixation for intraoperative fracture was in Types 1 and 2 (13 of 18 compared with the five of 18 of greater tuberosity fixation that was within Types 0 and 3, p = 0.043). Most bone grafting was in Types 2 and 3 (eight of 13 compared with five of 13 of bone grafting was in Types 0 and 1, p = 0.044). Most proximal humeral and total humeral replacements were in Type 3 (three of four compared with one of four, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) system, which has adequate, if imperfect, reliability to classify humeral bone loss in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty. This classification system may be useful to anticipate the complexity of humeral reconstruction. Further validation incorporating advanced imaging and further evaluators will be necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Posteriorly Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis with Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss

BACKGROUND

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component, used in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology, to correct preoperative retroversion and humeral head subluxation and to identify factors associated with radiographic radiolucency and patient-reported clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 71 shoulders with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology that underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with use of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component and with a preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scan and a minimum of 2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), shoulder range of motion, glenoid center-peg osteolysis, and postoperative version and humeral head subluxation were the main outcome variables of interest.

RESULTS

Follow-up was a median of 2.4 years (range, 1.9 to 5.7 years); the mean patient age at treatment was 65 ± 7 years (range, 51 to 80 years). PSS, range of motion, humeral head centering, and glenoid version were significantly improved among all patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with persistent posterior subluxation of the humeral head postoperatively had worse preoperative fatty infiltration of the teres minor and greater postoperative component retroversion (p < 0.05). Patients with center-peg osteolysis had more preoperative joint-line medialization and posterior glenoid bone loss (p < 0.05). Patients with more preoperative humeral head posterior subluxation had a lower PSS, adjusting for confounders (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid components can improve pathologic retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humeral head in B2 and B3 glenoids, with significant improvements found in clinical outcome scores at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in the vast majority of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A statistical shape model to predict the premorbid glenoid cavity

BACKGROUND

This study proposes a method for inferring the premorbid glenoid shape and orientation of scapulae affected by glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) to inform restorative surgery.

METHODS

A statistical shape model (SSM) built from 64 healthy scapulae was used to reconstruct the premorbid glenoid shape based on anatomic features that are considered unaffected by OA. First, the method was validated on healthy scapulae by quantifying the accuracy of the predicted shape in terms of surface distance, glenoid version, and inclination. The SSM-based reconstruction was then applied to 30 OA scapulae. Glenoid version and inclination were measured fully automatically and compared between the original OA glenoids, SSM-based glenoid reconstructions, and healthy scapulae.

RESULTS

Validation on healthy scapulae showed a root-mean-square surface distance between original and predicted glenoids of 1.0 ± 0.2 mm. The prediction error was 2.3° ± 1.8° for glenoid version and 2.1° ± 2.0° for inclination. When applied to an OA dataset, SSM-based reconstruction restored average glenoid version and inclination to values similar to the healthy situation. No differences were observed between average orientation values measured on SSM-based reconstructed and healthy scapulae (P ≥ .10). However, the average orientation of the reconstructed premorbid glenoid differed from the average orientation of OA glenoids for Walch classes A1 (version) and B2 (version, inclination, and medialization).

CONCLUSION

The proposed SSM can predict the premorbid glenoid cavity of healthy scapulae with millimeter accuracy. This technique has the potential to reconstruct the premorbid glenoid cavity shape, as it was prior to OA, and thus to guide the positioning of glenoid implants in total shoulder arthroplasty.