1
|
Krupp R, O'Grady C, Werner B, Wiater JM, Nyland J, Duquin T. A two-year comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty mini-humeral tray and augmented mini-glenoid baseplate implants vs. standard implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:1925-1935. [PMID: 38523239 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05276-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who undergo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are getting younger with greater function expectations. This retrospective, longitudinal study of prospectively collected data compared perceived shoulder function and strength, active shoulder mobility, radiographic evidence of scapular notching, and implant survival over the initial 2-years post-RTSA among patient groups who received either standard central fixation point liner and glenoid baseplate implants, or lower size profile mini-humeral tray with offset trunnion options and mini-augmented glenoid baseplate implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent primary RTSA using standard central fixation point liner and glenoid baseplate implants (Group 1, n = 180) were compared with patients who underwent primary RTSA using lower size profile mini-humeral tray with offset trunnion options and mini-augmented glenoid baseplate implants (Group 2, n = 53) for active shoulder mobility, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, perceived ability to lift 10 lbs (4.5 kg) overhead, radiographic evidence of scapular notching, and implant survival. Data was collected pre-surgery, 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-RTSA (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS More Group 2 patients had more complex B or C Walch glenoid morphology, while Group 1 had more A1 or A2 types (p ≤ 0.001). Group 2 had greater active shoulder flexion at 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years (p ≤ 0.018) and external rotation (in adduction) at 6-months and 2-years (p ≤ 0.004) compared to Group 1, with higher ASES scores at 6-months and 2-years (p ≤ 0.026) (with small-to-medium effect sizes), and with more patients meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 2-years (p = 0.045) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) levels at 6-months, 1-year and 2-years (p ≤ 0.045). Scapular notching was identified in six of 53 (11.3%) Group 2 patients and in 32 of 180 (17.7%) Group 1 patients. Group 1 patients had more grade 2 or greater scapular notching grades compared to Group 2 (p = 0.04). Implant survival was comparable with Group 1 = eight of 180 (4.4%) and Group 2 = 1 of 53 (1.9%) of patients requiring removal for 95.6% and 98.1% implant survival, respectively. CONCLUSION Limited scapular notching and excellent implant survival was observed in both groups. Despite including individuals with more complex glenoid deficiency, patients receiving the lower size profile implants generally displayed better active shoulder mobility and perceived shoulder function compared to those who received standard implants. These patients also more frequently met or exceeded the MCID by 2-years post-RTSA and PASS levels by 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-RTSA, with lower scapular notching grades. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Krupp
- Norton Orthopedic Institute, 9880 Angies Way Suite 250, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA
| | | | - Brian Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - J Michael Wiater
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - John Nyland
- Norton Orthopedic Institute, 9880 Angies Way Suite 250, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
| | - Thomas Duquin
- Department of Orthopaedics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park JH, Kim HG, Kim JS, Kim SC, Yoo JC. SPECT/CT for Early Detection of Stress Reactions After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Potential Clinical Significance. Clin Nucl Med 2024; 49:246-249. [PMID: 38271252 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The altered biomechanics after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, combined with the accumulation of various stress risers, can lead to stress fractures (SFs) around the prosthesis. The incidence of stress reactions (SRs) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, characterized by pain and tenderness without radiographic or CT evidence of fractures, is approximately 4.2%, which is comparable to the incidence of SF (6.4%). Among patients with SR, a substantial 32% eventually progress to fractures during clinical follow-up. SPECT/CT is a promising tool that combines morphologic and metabolic information for assessing mechanical bone stress. Therefore, early detection of SR through SPECT/CT can help prevent SF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Hun Park
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stenson JF, Mills ZD, Dasari SP, Whitson AJ, Hsu JE, Matsen FA. Managing rotator cuff tear arthropathy: a role for cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty as well as reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e162-e174. [PMID: 37473904 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disabling cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) is commonly managed with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). However, for patients with CTA having preserved active elevation, cuff tear arthropathy hemiarthroplasty (CTAH) may offer a cost-effective alternative that avoids the complications unique to RSA. We sought to determine the characteristics and outcomes of a series of patients with CTA managed with these procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 103 patients with CTA treated with shoulder arthroplasty, the type of which was determined by the patient's ability to actively elevate the arm. Outcome measures included the change in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the percent maximum improvement in SST (%MPI), and the percentage of patients exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the change in SST and %MPI. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated to assess the positions of the center of rotation and the greater tuberosity for each implant. RESULTS Forty-four percent of the 103 patients were managed with CTAH while 56% were managed with RSA. Both arthroplasties resulted in clinically significant improvement. Patients having RSA improved from a mean preoperative SST score of 1.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-3.0) to a postoperative score of 6.3 (IQR, 2.3-10.0) (P < .01). Patients having CTAH improved from a preoperative SST score of 3.1 (IQR, 1.0-4.0) to a postoperative score of 7.6 (IQR, 5.0-10.) (P < .001). These improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Instability accounted for most of the RSA complications; however, it did not account for any CTAH complications. The postoperative position of the center of rotation and greater tuberosity on anteroposterior radiographs did not correlate with the clinical outcomes for either procedure. CONCLUSION For 103 patients with CTA, clinically significant improvement was achieved with appropriately indicated CTAH and RSA. In view of the lower cost of the CTAH implant, it may provide a cost-effective alternative to RSA for patients with retained active elevation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Stenson
- Orthopedic Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zachary D Mills
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Suhas P Dasari
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anastasia J Whitson
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Frederick A Matsen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krupp R, O'Grady C, Werner B, Wiater JM, Nyland J, Duquin T. Mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant comparisons: two-year clinical outcomes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 34:1045-1056. [PMID: 37898968 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03757-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Augmented glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implants may decrease the mechanical impingement that creates scapular notching and improve shoulder function. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different RTSA glenoid baseplate and offset humeral tray combinations for patient-reported shoulder function, pain and instability, radiographic imaging evidence of glenoid baseplate or humeral stem subsidence and migration, bony changes associated with implant loosening, and scapular notching over the initial 2 years post-RTSA. Primary outcomes included active shoulder mobility, perceived function, pain, instability, scapular notching, and implant survival. METHODS Sixty-seven patients from 6 research sites received one of three different glenoid baseplate and humeral tray combinations. Group 1 (n = 21) received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray; Group 2 (n = 23) received a standard glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options; Group 3 (n = 23) received both a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and a mini-humeral tray with 3 trunnion offset options. Subjects underwent radiologic evaluation, completed the ASES scale, the EQ-5D-5L quality of life scale, VAS shoulder pain and instability questions, and active shoulder mobility measurements pre-operatively, and 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-2 years post-RTSA. RESULTS Improved active shoulder mobility, quality of life, perceived function, decreased shoulder pain and instability, excellent implant survival and minimal scapular notching were observed for all groups. Group 3 had better overall active shoulder mobility than the other groups and better perceived function than Group 1. CONCLUSION The group that received the mini-augmented glenoid baseplate and mini-humeral tray combination had better overall active shoulder flexion, external rotation at 90° abduction, and internal rotation. This group also had better perceived shoulder function compared to the group that received a mini-augmented glenoid baseplate with a standard humeral tray.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Krupp
- Norton Orthopedic Institute, 9880 Angies Way Suite 250, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA
| | | | - Brian Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - J Michael Wiater
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, , Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - John Nyland
- Norton Orthopedic Institute, 9880 Angies Way Suite 250, Louisville, KY, 40241, USA.
| | - Thomas Duquin
- Department of Orthopaedics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu X, Sun Q, Liu Y, Wang D, Diao S, Wang H, Gao Y, Lu T, Zhou J. Comparative Analysis of Eccentric Glenosphere in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computer Simulation Study. Int J Gen Med 2023; 16:4691-4704. [PMID: 37868817 PMCID: PMC10590075 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s426191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim was to evaluate the effects of different glenosphere eccentricities on impingement, range of motion (ROM), and muscle length during standard activities in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Methods In this study, we utilized computational modeling techniques to create native shoulder and shoulder models undergoing RSA and simulate shoulder movements in all abduction-adduction, flexion-extension, and rotation. We tested a total of 36 different glenosphere configurations, which included three different inferior tilts (0°, +10°, +20°) and two different lateral offsets (0 mm and +4 mm), as well as six different glenosphere eccentricities (concentricity, inferior, posterior, anterior, anteroinferior, and posteroinferior). We evaluated the maximum impingement-free ROM, impingement sites, and muscle lengths. Results All glenosphere configurations exceeded 50% of native shoulder ROM in three planes and total global ROM. In abduction-adduction, there was no significant difference among the different glenosphere eccentricities (p > 0.05). In flexion-extension, the posteroinferior eccentricity had the maximum ROM among the different eccentricities, but no significant difference among the different glenosphere eccentricities (p > 0.05). In rotation, there was a significant difference overall, and anteroinferior eccentricity had a significant advantage over concentricity (p < 0.05). In total global ROM, anteroinferior eccentricity had a significant advantage over concentricity when lateral offset was 0 mm (p < 0.05). In all models of glenosphere eccentricities, only the elongation of the infraspinatus muscle was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Glenosphere eccentricity significantly influenced rotation, total global ROM, and the length of the subscapularis muscle. Among them, anteroinferior offset achieved the maximum ROM in abduction-adduction, rotation, and total global activities. Both anteroinferior and inferior glenoid eccentricity showed significant advantages over the concentricity in rotation and total global ROM. Level of Evidence Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaopei Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qingnan Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuo Diao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hanzhou Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuling Gao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianchao Lu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junlin Zhou
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Franceschi F, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Gupta A, Athwal GS, Di Giacomo G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: State-of-the-art. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:306-317. [PMID: 37301479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The reverse shoulder arthroplasty conceived by Paul Grammont in 1985 has gradually gained popularity as a treatment for multiple shoulder diseases. Unlike previous reverse shoulder prosthesis characterized by unsatisfactory results and a high glenoid implant failure rate, the Grammont design has immediately shown good clinical outcomes. This semi constrained prosthesis solved the issues of the very first designs by medializing and distalizing the center of rotation with an increased stability of the replacement of the component. The indication was initially limited to cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). It has then been expanded to irreparable massive cuff tears and displaced humeral head fractures. The most frequent problems of this design are a limited postoperative external rotation and scapular notching. Different modifications to the original Grammont design have been proposed with the aim of decreasing the risk of failure and complications and improving the clinical outcomes. Both the position and version/inclination of the glenosphere and the humeral configuration (e.g. neck shaft angle) influence the RSA outcomes. A lateralized glenoid (whether with bone or metal) and a 135° Inlay system configuration leads to a moment arm which is the closest to the native shoulder. Clinical research will focus on implant designs reducing bone adaptations and revision rate, strategies to prevent more effectively infections. Furthermore, there is still room for improvement in terms of better postoperative internal and external rotations and clinical outcomes after RSA implanted for humeral fracture and revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Franceschi
- UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome 00100, Italy; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome 00100, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis
- UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome 00100, Italy; Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome 00100, Italy.
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
| | - George S Athwal
- The Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cogan CJ, Ho JC, Entezari V, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti ET. The Influence of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Design on Biomechanics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2023; 16:95-102. [PMID: 36735182 PMCID: PMC9944260 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09820-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As reverse total shoulder arthroplasty indications have expanded and the incidence of its use has increased, developments in implant design have been a critical component of its success. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent literature regarding the effect of implant design on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics. RECENT FINDINGS Implant design for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has evolved considerably from the modern design developed by Paul Grammont. The Grammont design had a medialized center of rotation and distalized humerus resulting from a 155° humeral neck shaft angle. These changes intended to decrease the forces on the glenoid component, thereby decreasing the risk for implant loosening and improving the deltoid moment arm. However, these features also led to scapular notching. The Grammont design has been modified over the last 20 years to increase the lateral offset of the glenosphere and decrease the prosthetic humeral neck shaft angle to 135°. These changes were made to optimize functional range of motion while minimizing scapular notching and improving active external rotation strength. Lastly, the introduction of preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation has improved surgeon ability to accurately place implants and optimize impingement-free range of motion. Success and durability of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been contingent upon changes in implant design, starting with the Grammont-style prosthesis. Current humeral and glenoid implant designs vary in parameters such as humeral and glenoid offset, humeral tray design, liner thickness, and neck-shaft angle. A better understanding of the biomechanical implications of these design parameters will allow us to optimize shoulder function and minimize implant-related complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles J. Cogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Jason C. Ho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Vahid Entezari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Joseph P. Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Eric T. Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Early clinical outcomes following navigation-assisted baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:302-309. [PMID: 35998780 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate placement of the glenoid baseplate is an important technical goal of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The use of computer navigated instrumentation has been shown to improve the accuracy and precision of intraoperative execution of preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to compare early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing navigated RSA vs. a non-navigated matched cohort. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was used to identify 113 patients from a single institution who underwent navigated primary RSA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. A matched cohort of 113 non-navigated RSAs was created based on sex, age, follow-up, and preoperative diagnosis. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, functional outcome scores, and complications were reported. RESULTS A total of 226 shoulders with a mean age of 71 years were evaluated after navigated (113) or non-navigated (113) RSAs. The mean follow-up was 32.8 months (range: 21-54 months). At the final postoperative follow-up, the navigated group had better active forward elevation (135° vs. 129°, P = .023), active external rotation (39° vs. 32°, P = .003), and Constant scores (71.1 vs. 65.5, P = .003). However, when comparing improvements from the preoperative state, there was no statistically significant difference in range of motion or functional outcome scores between the groups. Complications occurred in 1.8% (2) of patients undergoing navigated RSA compared with 5.3% (6) in the non-navigated group (P = .28). Scapular notching (3.1% vs. 8.0%, P = .21) and revision surgery (0.9% vs. 3.5%, P = .37) were more common in non-navigated shoulders. CONCLUSION At early follow-up, navigated and non-navigated RSAs yielded similar rates of improvement in range of motion and functional outcome scores. Notching and reoperation was more common in non-navigated shoulders, but did not reach statistical significance. Longer follow-up and larger cohort size are needed to determine if intraoperative navigation lengthens the durability of RSA results and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sulkar HJ, Aliaj K, Tashjian RZ, Chalmers PN, Foreman KB, Henninger HB. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Alters Humerothoracic, Scapulothoracic, and Glenohumeral Motion During Weighted Scaption. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:2254-2265. [PMID: 35857295 PMCID: PMC9555951 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) typically restores active arm elevation. Prior studies in patients with rTSA during tasks that load the arm had limitations that obscured underlying three-dimensional (3D) kinematic changes and the origins of motion restrictions. Understanding the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to loaded arm elevation will uncover where functional deficits arise and inform strategies to improve rTSA outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In a cohort of patients who had undergone rTSA and a control cohort, we asked: (1) Is there a difference in maximum humerothoracic elevation when scapular plane elevation (scaption) is performed with and without a handheld weight? (2) Is maximum humerothoracic elevation related to factors like demographics, patient-reported outcome scores, isometric strength, and scapular notching (in the rTSA group only)? (3) Are there differences in underlying 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion during scaption with and without a handheld weight? METHODS Ten participants who underwent rTSA (six males, four females; age 73 ± 8 years) were recruited at follow-up visits if they were more than 1 year postoperative (24 ± 11 months), had a BMI less than 35 kg/m 2 (29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ), had a preoperative CT scan, and could perform pain-free scaption. Data from 10 participants with a nonpathologic shoulder, collected previously (five males, five females; age 58 ± 7 years; BMI 26 ± 3 kg/m 2 ), were a control group with the same high-resolution quantitative metrics available for comparison. Participants in both groups performed scaption with and without a 2.2-kg handheld weight while being imaged with biplane fluoroscopy. Maximum humerothoracic elevation and 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics across their achievable ROM were collected via dynamic imaging. In the same session the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and isometric strength were collected. Data were compared between weighted and unweighted scaption using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS When compared with unweighted scaption, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption for patients who underwent rTSA (-25° ± 30°; p = 0.03) but not for the control group (-2° ± 5°; p = 0.35). In the rTSA group, maximum elevation correlated with the ASES score (r = 0.72; p = 0.02), and weighted scaption correlated with BMI (r = 0.72; p = 0.02) and the SST (r = 0.76; p = 0.01). Scapular notching was observed in three patients after rTSA (Grades 1 and 2). Four of 10 patients who underwent rTSA performed weighted scaption to less than 90° humerothoracic elevation using almost exclusively scapulothoracic motion, with little glenohumeral contribution. This manifested as changes in the estimated coefficient representing mean differences in slopes in the humerothoracic plane of elevation (-12° ± 2°; p < 0.001) and true axial rotation (-16° ± 2°; p < 0.001), scapulothoracic upward rotation (7° ± 1°; p < 0.001), and glenohumeral elevation (-12° ± 1°; p < 0.001), plane of elevation (-8° ± 3°; p = 0.002), and true axial rotation (-11° ± 2°; p < 0.001). The control group demonstrated small differences between scaption activities (< |2°|), but a 10° increase in humerothoracic and glenohumeral axial rotation (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION After rTSA surgery, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption by up to 88° compared with unweighted scaption, whereas 4 of 10 patients could not achieve more than 90° of elevation. These patients exhibited appreciable changes in nearly all scapulothoracic and glenohumeral degrees of freedom, most notably a near absence of glenohumeral elevation during weighted scaption. Patients with rTSA have unique strategies to elevate their arms, often with decreased glenohumeral motion and resultant compensation in scapulothoracic motion. In contrast, the control group showed few differences when lifting a handheld weight. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Functional deficiency in activities that load the shoulder after rTSA surgery can affect patient independence, and they may be prevalent but not captured in clinical studies. Pre- or postoperative rehabilitation to strengthen scapular stabilizers and the deltoid should be evaluated against postoperative shoulder function. Further study is required to determine the etiology of deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA, and the most effective surgical and/or rehabilitative strategies to restore deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema J. Sulkar
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Klevis Aliaj
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Peter N. Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - K. Bo Foreman
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Heath B. Henninger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dean EW, Dean NE, Wright TW, Hao KA, Schoch BS, Farmer KW, Struk AM, King JJ. Clinical outcomes related to glenosphere overhang in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lateralized humeral design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:2106-2115. [PMID: 35472577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated that decreased impingement-free range of motion (ROM) can adversely influence clinical outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Inferior placement of the glenosphere is thought to minimize impingement and its associated sequelae. This study evaluated the relationship between inferior overhang of the glenosphere and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary RSA using a lateralized humeral implant design. METHODS By use of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database, all primary RSAs performed at our institution between 2007 and 2015 with a single implant design (lateralized humerus and medialized glenoid) and minimum 2-year follow-up were evaluated. Glenosphere overhang in relation to the inferior rim of the glenoid was measured in millimeters on postoperative Grashey radiographs of the shoulder and categorized into tertiles (low, <7.1 mm; medium, 7.1 to 9.9 mm; and high, >9.9 mm). Clinical outcomes of interest comprised the changes between preoperative and postoperative values in the following ROM and outcome score measures: active forward elevation (aFE), active external rotation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score, and Simple Shoulder Test score. Random-effects linear models were used to assess univariate and multivariable associations between overhang tertile and change in patient outcomes. Differences in outcomes were further compared using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS The study identified 284 shoulders in 265 patients. The median follow-up period was 36 months (range, 24-108 months). The median glenosphere inferior overhang was 8.4 mm, with an interquartile range of 6.3-10.6 mm. Plots demonstrated nonlinear relationships between overhang and outcome scores and between overhang and ROM. Patients with high overhang experienced a significantly greater improvement in aFE compared with patients with low overhang (P = .019), which exceeded the MCID. No other differences in ROM and outcome scores between overhang groups exceeded the MCID. For other outcome scores and ROM measurements, there was no significant relationship with glenosphere overhang. Increased overhang was associated with a significantly lower incidence of scapular notching (P = .005). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing RSA using a lateralized humerus design with greater inferior overhang of the glenosphere demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in aFE and lower rate of notching compared with those with low overhang. No ideal glenosphere overhang range was identified to maximize function in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan W Dean
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Natalie E Dean
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kevin W Farmer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aimee M Struk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Preuss FR, Day HK, Peebles AM, Mologne MS, Provencher MT. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Treatment of Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear. Arthrosc Tech 2022; 11:e1133-e1139. [PMID: 35782844 PMCID: PMC9244853 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Massive tears of the rotator cuff can result in severe functional deficits due to loss of the axial force couple and effective fulcrum that the intact cuff normally provides. For massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, especially in the setting of early to moderate degenerative changes, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty functions to modify the center of joint rotation, allowing the deltoid and intact components of the cuff to carry out shoulder function more effectively. Our preferred technique uses a standard open deltopectoral shoulder approach with a 3-dimensional glenoid baseplate model and a 135° prosthesis in an onlay configuration to reduce the risk of scapular notching and increase lateralization of the humerus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fletcher R. Preuss
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Hannah K. Day
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A
| | | | | | - Matthew T. Provencher
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A,The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, U.S.A,Address correspondence to CAPT Matthew T. Provencher, M.D., M.B.A., M.C., U.S.N.R. (ret.), The Steadman Clinic, 181 W Meadow Dr, Ste 400, Vail, CO 81657, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kohut G, Reuther F, Joudet T, Kääb MJ, Irlenbusch U. Inverted-bearing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: scapular notching does not affect clinical outcomes and complications at up to 7 years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:868-874. [PMID: 34656780 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scapular notching is a common complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Inverted-bearing RTSA (IB-RTSA) systems, with polyethylene (PE) glenospheres and metal or ceramic humeral liners, reduce notching and PE wear compared with traditional Grammont prosthesis designs. However, whether notching after IB-RTSA influences clinical outcomes or complications remains unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of notching on midterm clinical outcomes and complication rates after IB-RTSA. METHODS In our prospective multicenter, observational study, patients underwent IB-RTSA, using a prosthesis system with a PE glenosphere and a metal humeral component. We assessed patients clinically for functional scores, active range of motion, and pain and radiographically for notching. RESULTS Overall, 270 patients (284 shoulders) were treated with IB-RTSA. Of these, 229 shoulders were available for a mean follow-up of 86.7 months (range, 24.0-133.4 months). We observed notching in 35% of shoulders (28% grade 1; 3% grade 2; and 4% grade 3). IB-RTSA led to a distinct type of notching representing the mechanical indent of the humeral component into the scapular neck without PE-induced osteolysis. Patients with and without notching showed similar clinical outcomes (P ≥ .05), complication rates (P = .23), revision rates (P = .87), and survival of implant components after 10 years (P = .85). CONCLUSIONS Midterm results confirmed our hypothesis that patients with notching had equally good clinical outcomes and low complication rates as patients without notching. Additionally, we found a distinct type of notching without signs of PE-induced osteolysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Kohut
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Clinique Générale Ste-Anne, Fribourg, Switzerland.
| | - Falk Reuther
- Clinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thierry Joudet
- Orthopaedic Surgery Centre, Clinique Chirurgicale du Libournais, Libourne, France
| | - Max J Kääb
- Sporthopaedicum Straubing, Straubing, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061512. [PMID: 35329837 PMCID: PMC8949196 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature regarding the latest design modifications and biomechanical evolutions of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and their impact on postoperative outcomes. Recent findings: Over the past decade, worldwide implantation rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have drastically increased for various shoulder pathologies. While Paul Grammont’s design principles first published in 1985 for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remained unchanged, several adjustments were made to address postoperative clinical and biomechanical challenges such as implant glenoid loosening, scapular notching, or limited range of motion in order to maximize functional outcomes and increase the longevity of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the adequate and stable fixation of prosthetic components can be challenging, especially in massive osteoarthritis with concomitant bone loss. To overcome such issues, surgical navigation and patient-specific instruments may be a viable tool to improve accurate prosthetic component positioning. Nevertheless, larger clinical series on the accuracy and possible complications of this novel technique are still missing.
Collapse
|
14
|
Moroder P, Urvoy M, Raiss P, Werthel JD, Akgün D, Chaoui J, Siegert P. Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:619-631. [PMID: 34669618 PMCID: PMC8846281 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Component selection and placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is still being debated. Recently, scapulothoracic orientation and posture have emerged as relevant factors when planning an RTSA. However, the degree to which those parameters may influence ROM and whether modifiable elements of implant configuration may be helpful in improving ROM among patients with different postures have not been thoroughly studied, and modeling them may be instructive. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Using a dedicated expansion of a conventional preoperative planning software, we asked: (1) How is patient posture likely to influence simulated ROM after virtual RTSA implantation? (2) Do changes in implant configuration, such as humeral component inclination and retrotorsion, or glenoid component size and centricity improve the simulated ROM after virtual RTSA implantation in patients with different posture types? METHODS In a computer laboratory study, available whole-torso CT scans of 30 patients (20 males and 10 females with a mean age of 65 ± 17 years) were analyzed to determine the posture type (Type A, upright posture, retracted scapulae; Type B, intermediate; Type C, kyphotic posture with protracted scapulae) based on the measured scapula internal rotation as previously described. The measurement of scapular internal rotation, which defines these posture types, was found to have a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.87) in a previous study, suggesting reliability of the employed classification. Three shoulder surgeons each independently virtually implanted a short, curved, metaphyseal impaction stem RTSA in each patient using three-dimensional (3D) preoperative surgical planning software. Modifications based on the original component positioning were automatically generated, including different humeral component retrotorsion (0°, 20°, and 40° of anatomic and scapular internal rotation) and neck-shaft angle (135°, 145°, and 155°) as well as glenoid component configuration (36-mm concentric, 36-mm eccentric, and 42-mm concentric), resulting in 3720 different RTSA configurations. For each configuration, the maximum potential ROM in different planes was determined by the software, and the effect of different posture types was analyzed by comparing subgroups. RESULTS Irrespective of the RTSA implant configuration, the posture types had a strong effect on the calculated ROM in all planes of motion, except for flexion. In particular, simulated ROM in patients with Type C compared with Type A posture demonstrated inferior adduction (median 5° [interquartile range -7° to 20°] versus 15° [IQR 7° to 22°]; p < 0.01), abduction (63° [IQR 48° to 78°] versus 72° [IQR 63° to 82°]; p < 0.01), extension (4° [IQR -8° to 12°] versus 19° [IQR 8° to 27°]; p < 0.01), and external rotation (7° [IQR -5° to 22°] versus 28° [IQR 13° to 39°]; p < 0.01). Lower retrotorsion and a higher neck-shaft angle of the humeral component as well as a small concentric glenosphere resulted in worse overall ROM in patients with Type C posture, with severe restriction of motion in adduction, extension, and external rotation to below 0°. CONCLUSION Different posture types affect the ROM after simulated RTSA implantation, regardless of implant configuration. An individualized choice of component configuration based on scapulothoracic orientation seems to attenuate the negative effects of posture Type B and C. Future studies on ROM after RTSA should consider patient posture and scapulothoracic orientation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE In patients with Type C posture, higher retrotorsion, a lower neck-shaft angle, and a larger or inferior eccentric glenosphere seem to be advantageous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Patric Raiss
- Orthopädische Chirurgie München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jean-David Werthel
- Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
- Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique La Montagne, Courbevoie, France
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Paul Siegert
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- 1st Orthopaedic Department, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Freislederer F, Toft F, Audigé L, Marzel A, Endell D, Scheibel M. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:341-351. [PMID: 34450279 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a lateralized design is thought to improve outcomes. Our aim was to compare RSA with the classic Grammont prosthesis against a prosthesis with 135° inclination and a lateralized glenosphere for cuff-deficient shoulders. METHODS Patients with irreparable massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear Hamada grade 1-3 underwent RSA and were documented prospectively up to 24 months postsurgery. Comparative RSA groups were "lateralized" (L), with 135° humeral inclination and 36+4-mm lateralized glenosphere (n = 44), and "Grammont" (G), with 155° humeral inclination and 36+2-mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 23). Range of motion including the Apley scratch test, abduction strength, Constant-Murley score (CS), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were assessed. Anteroposterior and axial radiographs were evaluated at 24 months, and additional measurements of scapular neck and glenoid anatomy, baseplate and glenosphere position, center of rotation, humeral offset, and lateralization and distalization shoulder angles were made. Linear regression and mixed models adjusted for sex differences and preoperative values were applied. RESULTS Overall CS and SPADI outcomes were not significantly different between groups (P ≥ .654). For group L, external rotation remained stable up to the 2-year follow-up and was higher than for group G (P = .012 ); a greater proportion of group L patients could reach the lumbar vertebra 3 (L3) (70% vs. 48% in group G) (P = .26). Group G had a higher inferior glenosphere overhang (P = .020) and center of rotation (COR) medialization (P < .001), whereas group L had higher humeral offset (P < .001) and lateralization shoulder angle (P < .001) with a trend toward higher baseplate positioning (P = .045). The rate of scapular notching was 2.9 times higher for group G than group L (P = .001). CONCLUSION RSA with 135° humeral inclination and a lateralized glenosphere shows similar outcome scores as the classic Grammont design but enables better preservation of external rotation and reduces the rate of scapular notching compared with the classic Grammont design in Hamada 1-3 patients with irreparable posterosuperior tears.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felix Toft
- Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Audigé
- Research and Development, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alex Marzel
- Research and Development, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Endell
- Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hao KA, Sutton CD, Wright TW, Schoch BS, Wright JO, Struk AM, Haupt ET, Leonor T, King JJ. Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2022; 6:200-208. [PMID: 35252914 PMCID: PMC8888204 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty is often difficult even with the use of preoperative planning. Computer navigation and patient-specific guides increase component placement accuracy, but which patients benefit most is unknown. Our purpose was to assess surgeons' accuracy in placing a glenoid component in vivo using 3-dimensional preoperative planning and standard instruments among various glenoid wear patterns. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 170 primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) performed at a single institution. Commercially available preoperative planning software was used in all arthroplasties with multiplanar 2-dimensional computed tomography and a 3-dimensional implant overlay. After registration of intraoperative bony landmarks to the navigation system, participating surgeons with knowledge of the preoperative plan were blinded to the computer screen and attempted to implement their preoperative plan by simulating placement of a central-axis glenoid guide pin. Two hundred thirty-three screenshots of surgeon's simulated guide pin placement were included. Glenoid displacement, error in version and inclination, and overall malposition from the preoperatively planned target point were stratified by posterior wear status (with [Walch B2 or B3] or without [A1, A2, or B1]) and Walch classification (A1, A2, B1, B2, or B3). The glenoid component was considered malpositioned when version or inclination errors exceeded 10° or the starting point displacement exceeded 4 mm. Results For rTSA, errors in version were greater for glenoids with posterior wear compared with those without (8.1° ± 5.6° vs. 4.7° ± 4.0°; P < .001). On post hoc analysis, B2 glenoids had greater version error than A1, A2, and B1 glenoids. A greater proportion of glenoids undergoing rTSA that possessed posterior wear had an error in version >10° compared with those without (31% vs. 8%; P < .001). Consequently, glenoids undergoing rTSA with posterior wear were malpositioned at a greater rate compared with those without (73% vs. 53%). In contrast, glenoids undergoing aTSA with and without posterior wear did not differ based on displacement error, version error, inclination error, or malposition occurrence. Conclusions Posterior glenoid bone loss more commonly resulted in glenoid version errors exceeding 10 degrees and component malposition in rTSA, but not for aTSA. Malposition was still relatively high in patients without significant posterior wear for both aTSA (36%) and rTSA (53%). Surgeons should consider alternate techniques beyond preoperative planning and standard instrumentation when performing shoulder arthroplasty in patients with posteriorly worn glenoids.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee JH, Chun YM, Kim DS, Lee DH, Shin SJ. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2533-2542. [PMID: 33813010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between the Grammont prosthesis and lateralized humeral design prosthesis. METHODS A total of 114 patients who underwent RSA with a lateralized humeral design (group L; 71 shoulders) and medialized humeral design (group M; 43 shoulders) prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathy or irreparable rotator cuff tear were enrolled. Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores and range of motion (ROM) were serially followed up at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Radiographic parameters were measured to evaluate preoperative and postoperative status. RESULTS Both prostheses demonstrated similar clinical outcomes and shoulder function preoperatively and at postoperative 2 years (P >.05). However, patients in group M had significantly better postoperative active forward flexion (postoperative 3 months, 115° ± 12° vs. 101° ± 14°; P <.001; 6 months, 125° ± 13° vs. 118° ± 13°; P <.013) and abduction (3 months, 105° ± 12° vs. 98° ± 12°; P = .002); VAS (3 months, 3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4; P = .031; 6 months, 2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3; P = .038); ASES (3 months, 64.2 ± 7.0 vs. 60.4 ± 9.2; P = .022; 6 months, 70.6 ± 6.0 vs. 66.6 ± 8.1; P = .007); and Constant scores (6 months, 59.6 ± 6.9 vs. 55.7 ± 9.3; P = .020). Group L showed a significantly lower rate of scapular notching than group M (15.5% vs. 41.8%; P < .001). The position of the proximal humerus in group L was more lateralized and less distalized than in group M after RSA. CONCLUSIONS RSA with both the Grammont and lateralized humeral design prostheses provided similar shoulder ROM restoration and functional improvements at a minimum of 2 years. However, patients with a humeral lateralized prosthesis showed slower recovery of shoulder function and ROM up to postoperative 6 months despite a lower incidence of scapular notching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Hoo Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Min Chun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo-Sup Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo-Hyung Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Jin Shin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Shoulder Disease Center, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Almeida A, Agostini DC, Nesello PF, de Almeida NC, Mioso R, Agostini AP. Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2021; 5:2471549220987714. [PMID: 34497966 PMCID: PMC8282139 DOI: 10.1177/2471549220987714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To verify whether reverse baseplate positioning without the support of intraoperative three-dimensional technology is within the acceptable parameters in the literature and whether glenoid bone deformity (GBD) compromises this positioning. Methods Sixty-nine reverse shoulder arthroplasties were evaluated with volumetric computed tomography (CT). Two radiologists performed blinded CT scan analysis and evaluated baseplate position within 2mm of the inferior glenoid; the inclination and version of the baseplate in relation to the Friedman line; and upper and lower screw and baseplate metallic peg end point positionings. The patients were divided according to the presence of GBD for statistical analyses. Results The two radiologists concurred reasonably in their interpretations of the following analyzed parameters: baseplate position within 2mm of the inferior glenoid rim (97.1% and 95.7%), baseplate inclination (82.6% and 81.2%), baseplate version (69.6% and 56.5%), the upper screw reaching the base of the coracoid process (71% and 79.7%), the inferior screw remaining inside the scapula (88.4% and 84.1%), and the metallic peg of the baseplate considered intraosseous (88.4% and 72.5%). Conclusion Reverse baseplate positioning without intraoperative three-dimensional technology is within the acceptable parameters of the literature, except for baseplate version and upper screw position. GBD did not interfere with baseplate positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Rafael Mioso
- Radiologist Physician, General Hospital, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Levins JG, Kukreja M, Paxton ES, Green A. Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Glenoid Implants in Shoulder Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202109000-00006. [PMID: 35417437 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
» Glenoid component positioning affects implant survival after total shoulder arthroplasty, and accurate glenoid-component positioning is an important technical aspect. » The use of virtual planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to produce reliable implant placement in the laboratory and in some clinical studies. » Currently available preoperative planning software programs employ different techniques to generate 3-dimensional models and produce anatomic measurements potentially affecting clinical decisions. » There are no published data, to our knowledge, on the effect of preoperative computer planning and patient-specific instrumentation on long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G Levins
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zuo D, Mu H, Yang Q, Sun M, Shen J, Wang H, Ma X, Wang C, Li C, Sun W, Cai Z. Do reverse total shoulder replacements have better clinical and functional outcomes than hemiarthroplasty for patients undergoing proximal humeral tumor resection using devitalized autograft composite reconstruction: a case-control study. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:453. [PMID: 34261497 PMCID: PMC8278672 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02488-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and prognosis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with shoulder hemiarthroplasty (SHA) using devitalized autograft or allograft composite reconstruction after proximal humeral tumor resection. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SHA (32) and rTSA (20) for tumor resections of the proximal humerus from January 2014 to July 2020. The clinical results included duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, bone union, visual analog scale (VAS) score, shoulder range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, recurrence, and overall survival. Results Fifty-two patients were followed up for a mean of 30 months. Thirty-two patients were SHA with allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) reconstructions, while other 20 were rTSA with devitalized autograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions. At the end of the follow-up, 2 recurrence, 3 postoperative infections, and 4 subluxations occurred among the SHA patients. Two patients in the rTSA group had postoperative anterior dislocation and underwent revision surgery with surgical mesh, and 2 (2/20) had grade II scapular notching. The mean VAS score of the shoulder was 1.5 ± 0.8 in the rTSA group and 2.3 ± 1.2 in the SHA group (p < 0.05). The mean active forward flexion of the shoulder joint was 50.6 ± 6.0 in the SHA group and 100 ± 7.6 in the rTSA group (p < 0.05). The ASES shoulder score was 78 ± 3.0 in the rTSA group and 52 ± 5.6 in the SHA group (p < 0.05). The overall 3-year survival rate of all patients was 60.0%, and patients in the rTSA group showed better survival in terms of the mean 3-year OS than patients in the SHA group (p = 0.04). Conclusion rTSA with devitalized autograft-prosthetic composite can offer a reasonable reconstruction of the shoulder joint after Malawer type I tumor resection. Compared with patients who underwent SHA, patients who underwent rTSA present good outcomes, a better range of motion, better bone union, and no increase in instability rate in the mid-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongqing Zuo
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Haoran Mu
- Shanghai Bone Tumor Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingbo Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital affiliated with Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengxiong Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Jiakang Shen
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Hongsheng Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Xiaojun Ma
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Chongren Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| | - Chuanping Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital affiliated with Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, China.,Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China.
| | - Zhengdong Cai
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Patel M, Martin JR, Campbell DH, Fernandes RR, Amini MH. Inferior tilt of the glenoid leads to medialization and increases impingement on the scapular neck in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1273-1281. [PMID: 33069903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Inferior tilt was originally promoted to decrease rates of baseplate failure. However, the literature is conflicting regarding the effect of tilt on scapular neck impingement, which has been associated with an increased risk of notching, increased risk of impingement-related instability, and decreased range of motion. We hypothesized that inferior tilt of -10° would lead to increased medialization and increased scapular neck impingement compared with 0° of tilt. METHODS Twenty patients without glenoid bone loss undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a single institution underwent computed tomography scans of the entire scapula and proximal humerus for preoperative planning. For each patient, we digitally implanted a 25-mm glenoid baseplate flush with the inferior rim of the glenoid. We then simulated impingement-free range of motion with 16 different implant configurations: glenoid tilt (0° vs. -10°), baseplate lateralization (0 mm vs. +6 mm), glenosphere size (36 mm vs. 42 mm), and neck-shaft angle (135° vs. 145°). The primary endpoint was external rotation with the arm at the side (ERS), which is the primary mode of both notching and impingement-related instability, and the secondary endpoint was adduction (ADD). We recorded the RSA angle, preoperative scapular neck length (SNL), and postoperative SNL. Data were compared by paired t tests and a multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS In every simulation, inferior tilt led to more impingement on the scapular neck. Inferior tilt of the glenoid component was associated with a mean 27% decrease in impingement-free external rotation (P < .01 in all cases) and a mean 32% decrease in impingement-free ADD (P < .01 in all cases). Inferior tilt removed 3.2 mm of additional SNL (P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that lateralization had the most impact on impingement-free external rotation and ADD (P < .001), followed by glenosphere size (P < .001), neck-shaft angle (P < .001), postoperative SNL (P < .001), glenoid tilt (P = .001), inclination (P < .001), and RSA angle (P = .023 for ERS and P = .025 for ADD). CONCLUSION Relative to 0° of tilt of the baseplate, inferior tilt of -10° was associated with increased scapular neck impingement in ERS and ADD, likely a result of the increased medialization necessary to seat an inferiorly tilted implant, which shortens the scapular neck and brings the humerus closer to the scapula. This scapular neck impingement increases the risk of notching and impingement-related instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midhat Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John R Martin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - David H Campbell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hochreiter B, Hasler A, Hasler J, Kriechling P, Borbas P, Gerber C. Factors influencing functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. JSES Int 2021; 5:679-687. [PMID: 34223415 PMCID: PMC8245997 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Functional internal rotation (fIR) of the shoulder is frequently limited after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The objective of this study was to study a cohort of satisfied patients after RTSA who had comparable active mobility except for fIR and to identify factors associated with selective loss of fIR. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare 2 patient groups with either poor (≤ 2 points in the Constant-Murley score [CS]) or excellent (≥8 points in CS) fIR after RTSA at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Influencing factors (demographic, surgical or implant related, radiographic parameters) and clinical outcome were analyzed. Results Fifty-two patients with a mean age of 72.8 (±9.3) and a mean follow-up of 41 months were included in the IR≤2 group and 63 patients with a mean age of 72.1 (±8.0) and a mean follow-up of 59 months in the IR≥8 group. All patients had undergone RTSA with the same implant type and only 2 different glenosphere sizes (36 and 40) for comparable indications. A multivariate analysis identified the following significant risk factors for poor postoperative fIR: poor preoperative fIR (pts in CS: 3 [range: 2-6] vs. 6 [range: 4-8], P<.0001), smoking (17.3% vs. 6.5%, P = .004), male gender (59.6% vs. 31.7%, P = .002), less preoperative to postoperative distalization of the greater tuberosity (Δ 19.4 mm vs. 22.2 mm, P = .026), a thin humeral insert (≤3 mm: 23.1% vs. 54.8%, P = .039), and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (≤ III: 30.8% vs. 14.3%, P = .043). Subscapularis repair status and glenosphere size had no influence on fIR. Clinical outcome scores improved in both groups from preoperatively to last follow-up. The IR≥8 group had overall significantly better outcome scores compared to the IR≤2 group (Δ 9.3% SSV and Δ 9.5% relative CS, P < .0001). There was no difference in CS between the cohorts when the score for fIR was discarded. Conclusion Independent risk factors for poor postoperative fIR after RTSA are poor preoperative fIR, smoking, male gender, less preoperative to postoperative distalization of the greater tuberosity, a thin humeral insert height, and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Except for male gender, these factors are modifiable. These findings may be a valuable addition to patient counselling as well as preoperative planning and preoperative and intraoperative decision-making. The relevance of fIR for overall satisfaction is substantiated by this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Hochreiter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Anita Hasler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Julian Hasler
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Kriechling
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Borbas
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Gerber
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Factors Influencing Appropriate Implant Selection and Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2021; 52:157-166. [PMID: 33752837 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has increased in popularity and has provided improved but somewhat variable results. These variable outcomes may be related to many factors, including implant design, component positioning, specific indication, and patient anatomy. The original Grammont design provided a solution to the high failure rate at the time but was found to have a high rate of scapular notching and poor restoration of rotation. Modern lateralized designs are more consistent in reducing scapular notching while improving range of motion, especially in regards to external rotation. This review article summarizes the effects of modern reverse shoulder prostheses on outcomes.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim SC, Kim IS, Jang MC, Yoo JC. Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review. Clin Shoulder Elb 2021; 24:42-52. [PMID: 33652512 PMCID: PMC7943379 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2021.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an ideal treatment for glenohumeral dysfunction due to cuff tear arthropathy. As the number of patients treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, the incidence of complications after this procedure also is increasing. The rate of complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty was reported to be 15%-24%. Recently, the following complications have been reported in order of frequency: periprosthetic infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, neurologic injury, scapular notching, acromion or scapular spine fracture, and aseptic loosening of prosthesis. However, the overall complication rate has varied across studies because of different prosthesis used, improvement of implant and surgical skills, and different definitions of complications. Some authors included complications that affect the clinical outcomes of the surgery, while others reported minor complications that do not affect the clinical outcomes such as minor reversible neurologic deficit or minimal scapular notching. This review article summarizes the processes related to diagnosis and treatment of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the aim of helping clinicians reduce complications and perform appropriate procedures if/when complications occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Cheol Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Su Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Chang Jang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Chul Yoo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Huish EG, Athwal GS, Neyton L, Walch G. Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:198-204. [PMID: 33044311 PMCID: PMC7899712 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have typically focused on maximizing ROM in elevation and external rotation and avoiding scapular notching. Improving internal rotation (IR) is often overlooked, despite its importance for functional outcomes in terms of patient self-care and hygiene. Although determinants of IR are multifactorial, it is unable to surpass limits of bony impingement of the implant. Identifying implant configurations that can reduce bony impingement in a computer model will help surgeons during preoperative planning and also direct implant design and clinical research going forward. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In a CT-modeling study, we asked: What reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implant position improves the range of impingement free internal rotation without compromising other motions (external rotation and extension)? METHODS CT images stored in a deidentified teaching database from 25 consecutive patients with Walch A1 glenoids underwent three-dimensional templating for RSA. Each template used the same implant and configuration, which consisted of an onlay humeral design and a 36-mm standard glenosphere. The resulting constructs were virtually taken through ROM until bony impingement was found. Variations were made in the RSA parameters of baseplate lateralization, glenosphere size, glenosphere overhang, humeral version, and humeral neck-shaft angle. Simulated ROM was repeated after each parameter was changed individually and then again after combining multiple changes into a single configuration. The impingement-free IR was calculated and compared between groups. We also evaluated the effect on other ROM including external rotation and extension to ensure that configurations with improvements in IR were not associated with losses in other areas. RESULTS Combining lateralization, inferiorization, varus neck-shaft angle, increased glenosphere size, and increased humeral anteversion resulted in a greater improvement in internal rotation than any single parameter change did (median baseline IR: 85° [interquartile range 73° to 90°]; combined changes: 119° [IQR 113° to 121°], median difference: 37° [IQR 32° to 43°]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Increased glenosphere overhang, varus neck-shaft angle, and humeral anteversion improved internal rotation in a computational model, while glenoid lateralization alone did not. Combining these techniques led to the greatest improvement in IR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This computer model study showed that various implant changes including inferiorization, varus neck-shaft angle, increased glenosphere size, and increased humeral anteversion can be combined to increase impingement-free IR. Surgeons can employ these currently available implant configurations to improve IR when planning and performing RSA. These findings support the need for further clinical studies validating the effect of implant configuration on resultant IR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric G Huish
- E. G. Huish, L. Neyton, G. Walch, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- E. G. Huish, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, CA, USA
- G. S. Athwal, St. Joseph's Health Care, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - George S Athwal
- E. G. Huish, L. Neyton, G. Walch, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- E. G. Huish, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, CA, USA
- G. S. Athwal, St. Joseph's Health Care, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lionel Neyton
- E. G. Huish, L. Neyton, G. Walch, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- E. G. Huish, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, CA, USA
- G. S. Athwal, St. Joseph's Health Care, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Gilles Walch
- E. G. Huish, L. Neyton, G. Walch, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
- E. G. Huish, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, CA, USA
- G. S. Athwal, St. Joseph's Health Care, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, University of Western Ontario, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lateralization and Decreased Neck-Shaft Angle Reduces Scapular Notching and Heterotopic Ossification. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e1073-e1080. [PMID: 32271176 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty likely mitigates scapular notching; however, there is a paucity of data evaluating the effect of heterotopic ossification (HO) at the inferior aspect of the glenoid neck. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 107 consecutive reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients between April 2013 and April 2016. During the study period, the surgeon switched from a 2.5-mm lateral center of rotation and a 155° neck-shaft angle (NSA) to a 6- or 10-mm lateralized design with a 135° NSA. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes and range of motion were collected. Two-year postoperative radiographs were evaluated for scapular notching and HO. RESULTS The lateralized center of rotation implant was 72% less likely to develop HO and 85% less likely to produce scapular notching than the medialized prosthesis. CONCLUSION Implants with laterally offset glenospheres and 135° NSA may decrease postoperative HO and scapular notching. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
|
27
|
Shelley RJ, DeFoor MT, Parada SA, Crosby LA. Clinical implications of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop 2020; 21:384-389. [PMID: 32921946 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Scapular notching is a unique radiographic sequela of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with unclear long-term clinical consequences. Methods Our retrospective review of a single surgeon, single implant, primary rTSA database investigates the incidence of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up. Various patient outcome scores were also obtained. Results Of 158 primary rTSAs performed, 82 (52%) patients completed 2-year and subsequent 5-year follow-up. The incidence of scapular notching at 2 and 5-years was 11.9% and 19.5%, respectively. Conclusion Scapular notching negatively affects validated post-operative outcome scores, active range of motion and total complications, and furthermore increases with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Shelley
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Mikalyn T DeFoor
- School of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Stephen A Parada
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Lynn A Crosby
- Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sodhi N, Mont MA. Shoulder replacement survivorship. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2020; 2:e513-e514. [PMID: 38273614 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30214-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Nipun Sodhi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 10075, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Torrens C, Miquel J, Martínez R, Santana F. Can small glenospheres with eccentricity reduce scapular notching as effectively as large glenospheres without eccentricity? A prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:217-224. [PMID: 31784386 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to analyze whether small glenospheres with eccentricity were comparable to large glenospheres in scapular notch development. METHODS This prospective randomized study included 82 patients who had undergone a reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 2-year follow-up period. After randomization, 43 patients were allocated to receive a 42-mm glenosphere and 39 patients were allocated to receive a 38-mm glenosphere with 2 mm of eccentricity. Scapular notch development was defined after examination of an anteroposterior radiograph at the end of follow-up. Functional outcomes were recorded using the Constant score before surgery and at the end of follow-up. RESULTS Scapular notch development was present in 16.6% of patients who received a 42-mm glenosphere and 34.2% of patients who received a 38-mm eccentric glenosphere. No significant difference was found between the groups with the number of cases available (P = .07). Functional outcomes significantly increased from preoperatively to postoperatively in both groups, with no significant difference found between them (P = .77). The mean glenosphere overhang measure was 6.3 mm in patients with a 42-mm glenosphere and 6.0 mm in those with a 38-mm eccentric glenosphere (P = .68). No significant differences were noted between patients with a scapular notch and patients without a scapular notch in terms of functional outcomes. DISCUSSION Small glenospheres with eccentricity fared slightly worse than large glenospheres regarding scapular notch development, even though no significant differences were noted. Functional outcomes were comparable between the 2 designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Torrens
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Joan Miquel
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital d'Igualada, Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Martínez
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Santana
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schoch BS, Vasilopoulos T, LaChaud G, Wright TW, Roche C, King JJ, Werthel JD. Optimal glenosphere size cannot be determined by patient height. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:258-265. [PMID: 31500985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glenosphere size remains 1 surgeon-controlled variable that can affect patient outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). There remains no objective criterion to guide surgeons in choosing glenosphere size. This study's purpose was to evaluate range of motion (ROM) as a function of patient height and glenosphere size to determine the optimal glenosphere size based on patient height. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 589 primary RSAs from a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty database of a single RSA system with multiple glenosphere sizes. Shoulders were separated into groups based on glenosphere size (38 or 42 mm). Predictive accuracy was calculated in relation to height and sex for predicting glenosphere size. Improvements in active ROM and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared based on glenosphere size as a function of height. RESULTS Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a strong association of height and sex with surgeon selection of glenosphere size, with shorter heights preferentially treated with 38-mm glenospheres and taller heights with 42-mm glenospheres. There were no statistically significant interaction effects of glenosphere size and height on improvements in ROM or PROMs. These results indicate that for a given glenosphere size, there is not an optimal height range to maximize improvements in postoperative outcome measures. DISCUSSION Height and sex are highly correlated with a surgeon's choice of glenosphere size. However, on the basis of improvements in ROM and PROMs, no recommendation can be made for surgeons to select a particular glenosphere size based on a patient's height. Surgeons should consider other variables when selecting a glenosphere size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Terrie Vasilopoulos
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gregory LaChaud
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Joseph J King
- Department Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jean David Werthel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hopital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Simovitch R, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Roche C. Impact of scapular notching on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty midterm outcomes: 5-year minimum follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:2301-2307. [PMID: 31311751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of scapula notching on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) clinical outcomes is controversial. The purpose of this study was to conduct a sufficiently statistically powered analysis to quantify the impact of scapular notching on midterm rTSA outcomes. METHODS There were 324 rTSA patients with 5 years of minimum follow-up evaluated. Patients were stratified according to the presence of a scapular notch at latest follow-up; radiographs were also assessed at each time point for patients with notching to determine the time for notch grade development. A 2-tailed, unpaired t-test compared preoperative, postoperative, and preoperative to postoperative outcomes between cohorts. RESULTS There were 324 patients having an average follow-up of 75.1 months assessed; 47 (14.5%) patients had scapular notching. For scapular notching patients, the average notching grade was 1.7 ± 0.8 (24 grade 1, 15 grade 2, and 8 grade 3). The average time to notch development was 51.4 ± 24.1 months; grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 notches developed at 49.0 ± 22.1 months, 57.5 ± 22.6 months, and 71.6 ± 15.8 months, respectively. No preoperative differences were observed between cohorts. At latest follow-up, scapular notching patients had significantly worse outcome scores and significantly less active abduction, forward flexion, and strength. Finally, scapular notching patients had significantly more complications, revisions, and humeral radiolucent lines. CONCLUSIONS Scapular notching patients had significantly worse clinical outcomes and less range of motion than patients without scapular notching; these differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference threshold for several outcome metrics. Based on these results, we recommend minimizing scapular notching through patient and implant selection and technique modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Simovitch
- Palm Beach Orthopaedic Institute, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA
| | | | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Our understanding of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has grown exponentially since Grammont first introduced his design in 1985. There are a multitude of implant-related variables to consider when performing RTSA. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of these design considerations. RECENT FINDINGS Current literature demonstrates that the traditional Grammont prosthesis has over 90% survivorship at 10 years. Despite these promising results, there have been concerns raised over the significant rate of scapular notching observed. As a result, the traditional RTSA design has been modified to minimize this complication and maximize impingement-free motion. Modern RTSA designs with a cementless, curved, short-stemmed eccentric onlay humeral component combined with a large, lateralized glenosphere placed in 10° of inferior tilt with > 3.5 mm of inferior overhang have been found to provide excellent results. However, all implant design features must be considered on a case-by-case basis to optimize outcome for each patient. Humeral and glenoid implant design variables have evolved as the biomechanics of RTSA have been further elucidated. Consideration of these variables allows the surgeon to maximize joint efficiency, improve impingement-free range of motion, decrease the risk of scapular notching, preserve bone stock, and minimize the risk of instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ujash Sheth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 259 East Erie, 13th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Matthew Saltzman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, 259 East Erie, 13th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lateral versus medial offset design for reverse shoulder replacement. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
34
|
Mebarki S, Aour B, Jourdan F, Malachanne E, Belaghit AH. A Study of the Biomechanical Behavior of the Implantation Method of Inverted Shoulder Prosthesis (BIO⁻RSA) under Different Abduction Movements. Bioengineering (Basel) 2019; 6:bioengineering6010019. [PMID: 30791359 PMCID: PMC6466006 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering6010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The shoulder is the most mobile joint of the human body, but it is very fragile; several pathologies, and especially muscular degenerations in the elderly, can affect its stability. These are more commonly called rotator cuff fractures. In the case of this type of pathology, the mobility of the shoulder decreases and pain appears. In order to restore mobility and reduce pain, implantation of an inverted shoulder prosthesis is recommended. Unfortunately, over time a notch phenomenon has been observed. In the lower position of the arm, part of the implant comes into contact with the scapula and therefore causes deterioration of the bone. Among the solutions adopted is the lateralized method with bone grafting. However, a main disadvantage of this method concerns the reconstruction of the graft in the case of prosthesis revision. In this context, the aim of the present work was to reconstruct the shoulder joint in 3D in order to obtain a bio-faithful geometry, and then study the behavior of different types of biomaterials that can replace bone grafting. To this end, three arm abduction motions were examined for three individuals. From the results obtained, it appears that grafts in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) exhibit a behavior closer to that of bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salah Mebarki
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics and Biomaterials (LABAB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Oran Maurice Audin, Oran 31000, Algeria.
| | - Benaoumeur Aour
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics and Biomaterials (LABAB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Oran Maurice Audin, Oran 31000, Algeria.
| | - Franck Jourdan
- Laboratoire de Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, 34090 Montpellier, France.
| | | | - Abdel Hakem Belaghit
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics and Biomaterials (LABAB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Polytechnic School of Oran Maurice Audin, Oran 31000, Algeria.
| |
Collapse
|