There Is No Column: A New Classification for Acetabular Fractures

Characteristic analysis and surgical exploration for acetabular roof fractures: Multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acetabular roof was a crucial structure for maintaining the stability of hip joint; however, its important role was not especially emphasized in the Letournel-Judet classification system. Acetabular roof was segmented into the roof column and roof wall in Three-column classification and fracture in this area alone was defined as A3 injury. The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics and surgical strategy of A3 injury.

METHODS

Patients with roof column/wall fractures received surgical management from January 2015 to 2019 January at nine level-1 trauma centers were retrospectively analyzed. Fracture data, surgical incision, operation time, blood loss, fracture healing and relevant complications were recorded to explore fracture characteristics and appropriate surgical strategy. Reduction quality was assessed based on postoperative radiographic examination. Merle d'Aubigné score was used to assess the functional outcome during the follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. Mean operation time was 112.83±21.77 min, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 396.67±182.00 ml. Satisfactory reduction quality was obtained in 49 cases (81.67%). All fractures healed well at an average mean of 3.07 months. Satisfactory outcomes were obtained in 46 cases (76.67%), and mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.53±1.33 points at the final follow-up. Reduction quality and functional outcome showed no statistical difference in three subtypes (P<0.05). Reduction quality and functional outcome presented positive correlation in three subtype fractures (P<0.05). The complication rate was 11.67% (7/60) in this study.

CONCLUSION

The injury mechanism of A3 injury was the direct impaction from femoral head on acetabular roof. Reduction and fixation of A3 injury were technique demanding, and poor prognosis may be accompanied even treated by experienced surgeons. Appropriate surgical strategies (Table 5) based on fracture characteristics in three subtypes of A3 injury were the premise of accepted prognosis.

Quadrilateral plate fractures

During the last two decades, extended scientific interest focused on quadrilateral plate (QLP) fractures as part of common acetabular fractures. The QLP corresponds to the medial wall of the acetabulum, and different fracture pattern of Letournel´s fracture types are associated with concomitant QLP fractures. Except anterior and posterior wall fractures, all other fracture types may be associated with QLP fractures. QLP fracture features include simple fracture lines up to highly comminuted fractures. A detailed preoperative analysis of these fractures is important to get a better understanding of intraoperative decision making. No consensus exists regarding the optimal classification and treatment of QLP fractures. Various operative approaches and treatment concepts exists depending on the specific QLP fracture type and the acetabular fracture type. Several new implants were development for optimal but often individual stabilization concepts. The gold-standard is still some medial buttressing during internal fixation predominantly using plates, but also screw fixation is considered an option. Additional dome impactions must be considered as an integral part in any QLP fracture analysis and stabilization.

Acetabular fracture pattern is altered by pre-injury sacroiliac joint autofusion

PURPOSE

Acetabular fracture shape is determined by the direction of force applied. We perceive an anecdotally observed connection between pre-existing autofused sacroiliac joints (aSIJ) and high anterior column (HAC) injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare variations in acetabular fracture patterns sustained in patients with and without pre-injury sacroiliac (SI) joint autofusion.

METHODS

All adult patients receiving unilateral acetabular fixation (level 1 academic trauma; 2008-2018) were reviewed. Injury radiographs and CT scans were reviewed for fracture patterns and pre-existing aSIJ. Fracture types were subgrouped presence of HAC injury (includes anterior column (AC), anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT), or associated both column (ABC)).

ANALYSIS

Logistic regression determined the association between aSIJ and HAC.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients received unilateral acetabular fixation (2008-2018); 61 (16%) demonstrated CT evidence of idiopathic aSIJ. These patients were older (64.1 vs. 47.4, p < 0.01), more likely to be male (95% vs. 71%, p < 0.01), less likely to be smokers (19.0% vs. 44.8%, p < 0.01), and were injured from lower energy mechanisms (21.3% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.01). The most common patterns with autofusion were ACPHT (n = 13, 21%) and ABC (n = 25, 41%). Autofusion was associated with greater odds of patterns involving a high anterior column injury (ABC, ACPHT, or isolated anterior column; OR = 4.97, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, mechanism, and body mass index, the connection between autofusion and high anterior column injuries remained significant (OR = 2.60, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SI joint autofusion appears to change mode of failure in acetabular injuries; a more rigid posterior ring may precipitate a high anterior column injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III.

Acetabular fracture in India: An epidemiological study

Introduction

Acetabular fractures, resulting from high-energy trauma, present significant orthopaedic challenges. Despite their rarity, the incidence of these fractures is rising, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of their epidemiological characteristics, especially in diverse populations like India.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from 3643 patients across four level-1 trauma centers in India (North 1, North 2, West, and South) from January 2001 to December 2019. Prior ethical approval was obtained from the respective institutions. Data were collected using the computerized patient record system (CPRS) and included patients with complete clinical and radiological records. Only patients with full radiological data were included, comprising standard anteroposterior radiograph, Judet views on radiographs, and computed tomography scan of the pelvis. The study evaluated the demographic characteristics, fracture patterns and surgical approaches.

Results

The majority of patients were males (84.05 %) and the fractures were mostly seen in young individuals between 19 and 40 years' age group (44.9 %), followed by 41-60 years (42.3 %). Associated bony or other system injuries were seen in 53.42 % of patients, with pelvic injuries being the most common (9.8 %). Posterior wall fractures were the most frequent (20.7 %), while anterior wall fractures were the least common (0.8 %). Operative management was employed in 82 % of cases, with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach being the most commonly employed (42.5 %).

Conclusion

High-velocity trauma remains the commonest cause of acetabular trauma in India, primarily affecting young male individuals. Pelvic fractures are the most commonly associated injuries. Posterior wall fractures are the commonest type of acetabular fracture, and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is the commonly adopted surgical approach.

Unclassified acetabular fractures: Do they really exist?

PURPOSE

Although Letournel classification is considered the corner stone for classifying acetabular fractures, however, it might not be perfectly inclusive. Unclassified fractures were reported by many authors. The aim of this case series is to report the incidence of unclassified acetabular fractures and description of these rare patterns and why they are considered unclassified acetabular fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective consecutive case series. In the period between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2017, 235 patients with 236 acetabular fractures were identified from our hospital records. Classification of the acetabular fractures according to Letournel was done by two surgeons. Any discrepancy in the classification between the two surgeons was resolved by the senior author. Before considering the fracture unclassifiable, all fractures were reviewed again by the two surgeon and the senior author.

RESULTS

In the period between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2017, 235 patients with 236 acetabular fractures were included in our study. Twenty-two fractures (9.3%) did not fit into any of the fracture types according to Letournel Classification as follows: 1 case (4.5%) was pure Quadrilateral plate fracture, 1 case (4.5%) was labral avulsion with tiny posterior wall rim, 1 case (4.5%) was pure articular impaction, 1 case (4.5%) was both columns fracture with posterior wall, 4 cases (18.2%) were anterior column and quadrilateral plate fracture, and 14 cases (63.8%) were T with posterior wall.

CONCLUSION

Several acetabular fracture pattern could be considered unclassified fractures. These unique patterns may require special approaches or special fixation methods. However, this is not a call for a new classification for acetabular classification to include these new types. Subclassification or adding modifiers to Letournel classification can do the job.

Quadrilateral plate classification program of acetabular fractures based on three-column classification: a three-dimensional fracture mapping study

BACKGROUND

A new classification system for acetabular fractures has been proposed in recent years, which is called the 3-column classification. However, this system does not provide information regarding quadrilateral plate fractures. To address this issue, we utilized three-dimensional (3D) fracture line mapping and heat map to analyze the link between the 3-column classification and quadrilateral plate fractures.

METHODS

We collected CT scan data from 177 patients who had been diagnosed with acetabular fractures. Additionally, we utilized a CT scan of a healthy adult to generate a standard acetabular model. We utilized the collected CT data of the fracture to create a 3D model and subsequently reduced it. We then matched each acetabular fracture model with the standard acetabular model and mapped all of the fracture lines to the standard model. 3D fracture lines and heat maps were created by overlapping all fracture lines. Fracture characteristics were then summarized using these maps.

RESULTS

This study analyzed a total of 221 acetabular fractures. The most frequently observed fracture type, based on the three-column classification, was A1.2, which corresponds to fractures of the anterior column. In contrast, the least common type of fracture was A4, which represents fractures of the central wall. It was noted that quadrilateral plate fractures were frequently observed in fractures classified as type B and C according to the three-column classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the three-column classification, the QLP fractures are commonly observed in type B and C. It is important to carefully identify these fractures during the diagnostic process. Therefore, based on the three-column classification, we have amalgamated quadrilateral plate fractures and formulated a classification program for acetabular fractures.

ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION

Introduction

The Judet and Letournel classification is the most widely used classification system for acetabular fractures. Some complex fractures couldn't be classified according to this classification. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the Letournel and Judet classification system for acetabular fractures.

Material and methods

10 acetabular fractures were analyzed among 17 orthopedic surgeons. The surgeons were asked to classify the fractures according to the Judet and Letournel classification. Their experience, the number of surgeries, and the incision type that the surgeon uses for the anterior part of the acetabulum were recorded.

Results

The overall interobserver agreement for the Letournel classification was found to be poor, with a Kappa value of 0.287. The Kappa value for interobserver agreement was 0.224 for plain radiographs, 0.293 for 2D-CT, and 0.321 for 3D-CT scans. There was no significant difference between the incision types used by the surgeons. The highest reliability was determined among the surgeons who operate on 10-20 acetabular fractures per year, with a Kappa value of 0.309.

Conclusion

This results revealed that the Judet and Letournel Judet classification is not sufficient to classify acetabular fractures because of unclassified fractures and the complex algorithm of the system. Level of Evidence III; Comparative Retrospective Study.

Predictors for post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis in patients with transverse acetabular fractures following open reduction internal fixation: a minimum of 2 years' follow-up multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The predictors of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in patients with transverse acetabular fractures (TAFs) following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for PTOA in TAFs after ORIF.

METHODS

Data of TAF patients receiving ORIF were collected from January 2012 and February 2021. Patients suffered PTOA were classified as the osteoarthritis group (OG), while those without PTOA were classified as the non- osteoarthritis group (NG) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. PTOA was diagnosed according to Tönnis OA classification during the period of follow-up. Univariate analysis, logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to evaluate demographics, injury-related characteristics, perioperative and post-discharge information.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eleven TAF patients were analyzed in this study, including 261 males and 50 females, with a mean age of 40.4 years (range 18 to 64 years). The incidence of PTOA was 29.6% (92 of 311) during the mean follow-up of 36.8 months (range 24 to 70 months). Several factors of PTOA were found using univariate analysis, including transverse fracture associated with posterior wall acetabular fracture (TPW-AF, p = 0.002), acetabular roof fracture (ARF, p = 0.001), femoral head lesion (FHL, p = 0.016), longer time from injury to surgery (TIS, p＜0.001) and physical work after surgery (PWAS, p＜0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that TPW-AF (p = 0.007, OR = 2.610, 95%CI: 1.302-5.232), ARF (p = 0.001, OR = 2.887, 95%CI: 1.512-5.512), FHL (p = 0.005, OR = 2.302, 95%CI: 1.283-4.131), TIS (p<0.0001, OR = 1.294, 95%CI: 1.192-1.405) and PWAS (p<0.0001, 3.198, 95%CI: 1.765-5.797) were independent risk factors of PTOA. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis indicated 11.5 days as the cut-off values to predict PTOA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identified that TPW-AF, ARF, FHL, TIS and PWAS were independent risk factors for PTOA in patients with TAFs following ORIF. It can help orthopedic surgeons to take early individualized interventions to reduce its incidence.

Inclined angles of acetabular quadrilateral plate: digital measurement and clinical application of the new anatomical concept

PURPOSE

Matta scoring standard is one of the most frequently used postoperative imaging evaluations for acetabular fracture reduction, but has obvious shortcomings. This study, for the first time, proposed the concept of inclined angles of acetabular quadrilateral plate. The purpose of this study was to investigate the normal range of the inclined angles in adults by digital measurement and explore the feasibility of using them to evaluate the reduction quality of acetabular quadrilateral fractures after surgery.

METHODS

Firstly, the pelvic CT three-dimensional reconstruction data of 40 healthy adults including 20 males and 20 females were collected. The normal range of the anterior, middle, and posterior inclined angles were measured via Mimics software. Secondly, a modified Matta criteria that combined the classic Matta criteria and evaluation criteria of the inclined angles was proposed. And we classified modified Matta criteria into three grades including excellent, good and poor. Finally, a total of 125 cases with quadrilateral plate fractures was included and the postoperative CT data were analyzed by using both the classic Matta criteria and our modified Matta criteria. Then, the accuracy and consistency of both criteria to evaluate postoperative hip function was investigated.

RESULTS

The average anterior inclined angle: male (97.11° ± 2.59°), female (90.63° ± 2.09°); middle inclined angle: male (105.57° ± 1.93°), female (100.64° ± 2.46°); and posterior inclined angle: male (112.62° ± 2.54), female (106.37° ± 2.53°). Whether in males or in females, the anterior, middle, and posterior inclined angles showed a progressively increasing trend. All the three inclined angles in males were all significantly larger than those in females (p < 0.05). Among 125 cases with quadrilateral plate fractures, 101 cases (80.8%) were graded as excellent, 18 cases (14.4%) as good, and 6 cases (4.8%) as poor according to the classic Matta criteria. While based on modified Matta criteria, there were excellent in 37 cases (29.6%), good in 76 cases (60.8%), and poor in 12 cases (9.6%). According to the Harris hip score system, the functional outcomes were excellent in 59 cases (47.2%), good in 26 cases (20.8%), fair in 24 cases (19.2%), and poor in 16 cases (12.8%). Our results showed that among the cases evaluated as excellent according to the classic Matta criteria and modified Matta criteria, the excellent-to-good rates of hip function were 70.3% and 78.4%, respectively. And among the cases evaluated as poor according to the modified Matta criteria, the fair-to-poor rate of hip function was 75%, while this value was 50% for classic Matta criteria. Both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Inclined angles of the quadrilateral plate could be used to assess the quality of fracture reduction and provide a basis for evaluating the rotational displacement of fracture blocks in the quadrilateral plate, which compensates the shortage of classic Matta criteria.

A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum

BACKGROUND

Recently, quadrilateral plate (QLP) fractures of acetabulum have attracted increasing attention. However, evidence for the appropriate classification of QLP fractures is still lacking, making it difficult to understand and manage these fractures. This study aimed to introduce a new classification for QLP fractures and evaluate its reproducibility.

METHODS

A series of 1101 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures from 8 level-I trauma centers were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent preoperative radiograph and computed tomography imaging. QLP fractures were identified and classified using the new and Judet-Letournel classification system. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities (kappa coefficients, κ) of these two systems were investigated by 4 observers. Furthermore, surgical approaches and fixation methods for each fracture type are described.

RESULTS

In total, 243 (243/1101, 22%) patients with QLP fractures were identified and included in this analysis. The mean κ value of the intra-observer reliability was 0.84 (range, 0.763-0.919) for the new classification, indicating excellent agreement, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.762 (range, 0.625-0.876), indicating substantial agreement. The values were 0.649 (range, 0.523-0.708) and 0.584 (0.497-0.646), respectively, according to the Judet-Letournel classification. Six cases (6/243, 2.5%) could not be classified using the Judet-Letournel classification. The selection of surgical approaches and fixation methods depends on the fracture type; however, an anterior intra-pelvic approach and buttressing fixation using the plate or screw are preferred for QLP fractures.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a new classification for QLP fractures, showing higher intra- and inter-observer reliabilities than those obtained using the Judet-Letournel classification. This allowed us to obtain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of QLP fractures. Additionally, the new classification might guide further studies on surgical strategies for QLP fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Development and validation of a deep learning-based model to distinguish acetabular fractures on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs

Objective: To develop and test a deep learning (DL) model to distinguish acetabular fractures (AFs) on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs (PARs) and compare its performance to that of clinicians. Materials and methods: A total of 1,120 patients from a big level-I trauma center were enrolled and allocated at a 3:1 ratio for the DL model's development and internal test. Another 86 patients from two independent hospitals were collected for external validation. A DL model for identifying AFs was constructed based on DenseNet. AFs were classified into types A, B, and C according to the three-column classification theory. Ten clinicians were recruited for AF detection. A potential misdiagnosed case (PMC) was defined based on clinicians' detection results. The detection performance of the clinicians and DL model were evaluated and compared. The detection performance of different subtypes using DL was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The means of 10 clinicians' sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to identify AFs were 0.750/0.735, 0.909/0.909, and 0.829/0.822, in the internal test/external validation set, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the DL detection model were 0.926/0.872, 0.978/0.988, and 0.952/0.930, respectively. The DL model identified type A fractures with an AUC of 0.963 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.927-0.985]/0.950 (95% CI: 0.867-0.989); type B fractures with an AUC of 0.991 (95% CI: 0.967-0.999)/0.989 (95% CI: 0.930-1.000); and type C fractures with an AUC of 1.000 (95% CI: 0.975-1.000)/1.000 (95% CI: 0.897-1.000) in the test/validation set. The DL model correctly recognized 56.5% (26/46) of PMCs. Conclusion: A DL model for distinguishing AFs on PARs is feasible. In this study, the DL model achieved a diagnostic performance comparable to or even superior to that of clinicians.

Construction of Processable Ultrastiff Hydrogel for Periarticular Fracture Strutting and Healing

Development of bioactive bone and joint implants that offer superior mechanical properties to facilitate personalized surgical procedures remains challenging in the field of biomedical materials. As for the hydrogel, mechanical property and processability are major obstructions hampering its application as load-bearing scaffolds in orthopedics. Herein, we constructed implantable composite hydrogels with appealing processability and ultrahigh stiffness. Central to our design is the incorporation of a thixotropic composite network into an elastic polymer network via dynamic interactions to synthesize a percolation-structured double-network (DN) hydrogel with plasticity, followed by in situ strengthening and self-strengthening mechanisms for fostering the DN structure to the cojoined-network structure and subsequently mineralized-composite-network structure to harvest excellent stiffness. The ultrastiff hydrogel is shapeable and can reach a compressive modulus of 80-200 MPa together with a fracture energy of 6-10 MJ/m³, comparable to the mechanical performance of cancellous bone. Moreover, the hydrogel is cytocompatible, osteogenic, and showed almost no volume shrinkage within 28 days in simulated body fluid or culture medium. Such characteristics enabled the utility of a hydrogel in the reduction and stabilization of periarticular fracture treatment on a distal femoral AO/OTA B1 fracture rabbit model and successfully avoided the recollapse of the articular surface.

Is the T-shaped acetabular fracture really likes a "T"? A study based on three-dimensional fracture mapping

OBJECTIVES

To explore the morphological pattern of T-shaped acetabular fractures (T-SAFs) by mapping the fracture line using 3D software.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1298 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures, and a total of 56 T-SAF patients were enrolled. After the simulated reduction of each fracture in the software, the fracture lines of all patients were overlaid and plotted on a template. A frequency heat map was generated according to the differences in fracture line density distribution. According to the location of fracture lines, all cases were divided into three groups: posterior group, anterior group, extra-posterior group. In surgically treated patients, the surgical approach, fixation methods, and reduction quality were recorded or evaluated.

RESULTS

The transverse fracture line was sinuous without involving the acetabular roof, and the longitudinal fracture line sloped forward or backward along the edge of the acetabular fossa to split the obturator foramen. The anterior and posterior edges of the acetabular fossa, the transition zone of the acetabular roof and anterior wall, the transition zone of the superior pubic ramus and anterior wall, and the posterior wall near the greater sciatic notch were areas with high rates of fracture incidence. The posterior group included 26 patients (46.4%) and the distribution of fracture lines resembled a "T" or "Y". The anterior group included 25 patients (44.6%) and the distribution of fracture lines resembled a "7″. The extra-posterior group included 5 patients (8.9%) and the fracture lines run through the ischial body. The surgical strategies vary among different groups of T-SAF patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings shed light on the characteristics of fracture lines for T-SAFs and provide a reference for surgical treatment strategies.

Displacement Pattern of Anterior and Posterior Column Fragments in Both-Column Acetabular Fractures: A 3D Reconstruction-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been conducted to examine the displacement characteristics of both-column acetabular fractures (BCAFs). The goal of this study was to investigate the displacement pattern of anterior column (AC) and posterior column (PC) fragments in BCAFs using 3D virtual software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BCAFs were retrospectively reviewed, and 81 patients were enrolled. Computed tomography (CT) images were imported into Mimics software. A 3D model of each pelvis was generated. Four marked points and the rotation angle of each of the injured ACs and PCs were identified. The fracture fragments were reduced virtually using the software, and the change in coordinates of the marked points after reduction was recorded while the rotation angle was measured. The measurements of positional and directional displacement were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the binomial test, respectively.

RESULTS

There was a propensity for AC fragments to shift superomedially and to rotate externally (p < 0.001). Additionally, the posteroinferior fracture area of AC fragments showed the greatest displacement (p < 0.05). PC fragments moved superomedially (p < 0.001) and moved more at the proximal end than the distal end (p < 0.001). PC displacement was always accompanied by internal rotation (p < 0.001). Greater AC displacement was observed in the fracture area further away from the acetabulum (p < 0.05). Greater rotation was observed for the AC than the PC (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After a BCAF occurs, there are regular patterns regarding the direction and distance of AC and PC fragment displacement. Information on these patterns may provide insight into the injury mechanism and fracture morphology and facilitate surgical decision-making for orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

The novel infra-pectineal buttress plates used for internal fixation of elderly quadrilateral surface involved acetabular fractures

Objectives

In geriatric acetabular fractures, the quadrilateral surface (QLS) was frequently involved in acetabular fracture patterns and accompanied by medial displacement. It was important to buttress the medial displaced QLS and reconstruct the congruity of the affected acetabulum. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the novel infra‐pectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plates for the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures.

Methods

Twenty‐three geriatric patients who were treated for acetabular fractures involving QLS with the novel infra‐pectineal buttress plates (NIBP) through a single supra‐ilioinguinal approach between January 2015 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed; all patients received at least 1 year's follow‐up. All patients were aged ≥60 years old and including 18 males and five females. Radiologic and clinical outcomes of patients involved in the study were collated and analyzed according to the Matta scoring system and the Merle D'Aubigné–Postel scoring system. The functional recovery scoring was compared using q‐test.

Results

All 23 consecutive patients had relatively satisfactory clinical treatment effectiveness. Average ages, length of incision, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss were 69.8 ± 6.1 years, 12.1 ± 2.6 cm, 166.5 ± 43.5 min, and 500 (500,700) ml, respectively. According to the Matta scoring system, 14 cases of reduction were graded as excellent, five as good, and four as fair. At the last follow‐up, the clinical outcome evaluation was excellent in 13 cases, good in seven cases, and poor in three cases with the use of the Merle D'Aubigné–Postel scoring system. The difference of modified Merle D'Aubigne‐Postel score at 3 months, 6 months and last follow up was statistically significant (F = 21.56, p < 0.05). Postoperative lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury occurred in three patients and heterotopic ossification occurred in one patient.

Conclusions

For the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures, the NIBP could provide stable and effective fixation to the QLS involved acetabular fractures, and related satisfactory clinical results with few complications were noted.

Validation of the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register

OBJECTIVES

To validate the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) and to investigate the intra- and interrater reliability of the Judet-Letournel / AO/OTA classification systems.

METHODS

Surgically treated acetabular fractures were randomly selected from the SFR (n = 132) and 124 fractures were classified independently by three experienced orthopedic pelvic surgeons at two different occasions. A gold standard classification was established for each case after these two sessions or, if necessary, after a discussion session. The gold standard classification was compared to the registered SFR classification to assess the validity of SFR data. Accuracy and intra- and interrater agreement were evaluated using Cohen´s kappa with interpretation according to Landis and Koch.

RESULTS

There was moderate agreement between the established gold standard classification and the SFR (kappa 0.43). The level of agreement differed between classification groups. The intrarater agreement was substantial to almost perfect and interrater agreement was moderate to substantial.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of acetabular fracture classifications in the SFR was moderate and comparable to previous validation studies from the SFR on other fracture types. As the accuracy differed between fracture groups, care should be taken when analyzing data from the SFR on specific acetabular fracture groups.

Three-dimensional mapping study of pure transverse acetabular fractures

BACKGROUND

To describe and analyze the morphological characteristics, location and frequency of pure transverse acetabular fracture lines through fracture mapping and quantitative measurements.

METHODS

Transverse fractures were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All computed tomography (CT) data were used for reconstruction and manual reduction. The reductive fracture fragments were graphically overlaid onto a three-dimensional (3D) right hemipelvis template. Then, the fracture lines were accurately depicted onto the surface of the 3D template. The fracture lines were overlapped onto the model to create the 3D fracture map and heatmap. All cases were subdivided into infratectal (62-B1.1), juxtatectal (62-B1.2), and transtectal (62-B1.3) types based on the AO Foundation/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. Some anatomic parameters of the transverse fractures were also analyzed in these 3 groups.

RESULTS

Our study included forty-nine transverse fractures from 32 male and 17 female patients (mean age, 42 years; range 21-74 years) and included 19 type 62-B1.1, 17 type 62-B1.2, and 13 type 62-B1.3 fractures. The average anterior rim fracture angle was 70.0° (± 11.6°), and the posterior rim fracture angle was 92.4° (± 28.5°). The anterior rim fracture angles in 40 cases (40/49, 81.6%) fell within a wide range between 63° and 80°. On the heatmap, the hot zones were located on the highest position of the cotyloid fossa and the narrowed region, and the cold zone was on the inferior third of the articular surface. For type 62-B1.3 fractures, the hot zone was located on the posterior of the acetabular dome. There were no significant differences in anterior rim fracture angle and anterior height among the three patterns (P = 0.071, P = 0.072). Post hoc tests of the posterior rim fracture angle and the posterior height revealed significant differences among fracture subtypes (P < 0.01). The posterior intra-articular fracture line was significantly longer than the anterior intra-articular fracture line in type 62-B1.1 and type 62-B1.2 fractures (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The fracture lines of transverse fractures through the anterior rim were concentrated on the narrowed zone, and the posterior fracture lines were diffusely distributed. The intra-articular fracture line distribution was focused on the superior and middle thirds of the joint surface. The recurrent fracture lines involving the weight-bearing dome mainly converged on the posterior region of the roof.

Fracture Mapping of Both-Column Acetabular Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the location and frequency of the fracture lines and comminution zones of both-column fractures using fracture mapping.

METHODS

Both-column fractures were retrospectively reviewed in 4 Level 1 trauma centers. Mimics software was used to reconstruct the both-column fractures and simulate the fracture reduction. Then, the fracture lines and the intra-articular and extra-articular comminution zones were drawn on a 3-dimensional innominate bone template. The distribution of fracture lines and fracture fragments were also mapped on the two-dimensional template of the acetabulum. All the included patients were divided into low-variety group and high-variety group according to the anterior column fracture line above or below the anterior superior spine. The anatomical characteristics of the posterior wall fragment were also analyzed in these 2 groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with both-column fracture were included. The T type or inverted Y type main fracture lines divided the innominate bone into low-variety (n = 11) and high-variety (n = 67) both-column fractures. The extra-articular comminution zones are usually distributed between the posterior iliac fragment and anterior column fragment. High-variety type both-column fractures are usually combined with high and sharp posterior wall fragments, whereas low-variety type both-column fractures are usually accompanied by low and flat posterior wall fragments. The comminution zones in the acetabulum are mostly concentrated in the anterior and inferior parts of the acetabulum.

CONCLUSIONS

The innominate bone is divided into 3 major parts in the both-column fracture, and the fracture center is located at the proximal of the acetabular dome. The both-column fractures are divided into low-variety and high-variety patterns. The location of the anterior column fracture determined the characteristics of the posterior wall fragment.

Algorithm Improves Acetabular Fracture Radiograph Interpretation Among Inexperienced Practitioners

Acetabular fractures are often first evaluated in the emergency department, where physicians with little experience reading pelvic radiographs may be required to make an accurate diagnosis and early management decisions. In this study, medical students classified radiographs of 20 acetabular fractures and repeated the exercise three weeks later with the aid of a previously described algorithm; half the students were given a lesson prior to using the algorithm. The pre-algorithm accuracy was 4/20 and the post-algorithm accuracy was 8.3/20 (p<0.01). The lesson provided no difference (p=0.5). This algorithm is therefore a useful reference to help classify and triage acetabular fractures.

Is "Transcolumnar" a better Terminology than "Transverse" in Judet-Letournel Classification of Acetabular Fractures?

Acetabular fractures are among the most complex and challenging injuries for orthopaedic surgeons. The choice of surgical treatment in acetabular fracture is important for optimal outcomes. It requires an understanding of the precise outline of the fracture by appropriate classification because it is important for decision making. For this purpose, the classification proposed by Judet and Letournel in 1963 remains the gold standard despite its shortcoming, which are attributed to the inclusion of multiple criteria including anatomical, directional and geometrical. This complex classification remains challenging especially to lesser experienced surgeons. In this article, a new method for classification of acetabulum fractures is proposed. It places posterior column with posterior wall fractures to simple fractures instead of complex fractures in Judet and Letournel classification. More importantly the proposed new classification renames “transverse fracture” as “transcolumnar fracture” to better represent anatomical structure rather than morphology. It is expected that by coining the new term “transcolumnar ”it will be easy to understand different types of acetabular fractures. Especially the confusion between “transverse” and “both column fractures” would not be a concern in future.

Exposure Provided by the Gibson Versus the Kocher-Langenbeck Approaches With and Without Trochanteric Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Mapping Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prevalent approaches in acetabular fracture surgery provide enhanced anterior and cranial exposure in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

A Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach (followed by a Gibson approach on the contralateral hip) was performed in the lateral position on 8 cadavers. A Steinmann pin was used to create holes outlining the bony surfaces available for instrumentation before and after a trochanteric osteotomy. All soft tissue was then removed from the pelvis, and a calibrated digital picture was taken. The surface area of the pelvis visualized through each approach was calculated and compared with the contralateral side to assess for a difference in exposure between the Gibson approach and the K-L approach. An increase in exposure of greater than 10% was considered significant. The extent of anterior exposure (with and without a trochanteric osteotomy) was then measured from the greater sciatic notch.

RESULTS

In 2 of 8 cadavers (25%), the Gibson approach yielded an increase in exposure when compared with a K-L approach. The addition of a trochanteric osteotomy yielded on average 1.6 cm (range, 0.7-2.6 cm) of increased anterior exposure in the K-L approaches and 1.5 cm (range 0.9-3.1 cm) in the Gibson approaches.

CONCLUSION

The Gibson approach did not reliably provide increased anterior exposure compared with a K-L approach in a cadaver model. A trochanteric osteotomy can be expected to add 1-2 cm of increased anterior exposure in both approaches.

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models

BACKGROUND

Acetabular fractures pose diagnostic and surgical challenges. They are classified using the Judet-Letournel system, which is based solely on X-ray. However, computed tomography (CT) imaging is now more widely utilized in diagnosing these injuries. The emergence of 3-dimensional (3-D) printing technology in varying orthopedic fields has provided surgeons a solid model that improves their spatial understanding of complex fractures and ability to plan pre-operatively.

AIM

To evaluate the reliability of the Judet-Letournel classification system of acetabular fractures, when using either CT imaging or 3-D printed models.

METHODS

Seven patients with acetabular fractures underwent pelvic CT imaging, which was then used to create solid, 3-D printed models. Eighteen orthopaedic trauma surgeons responded to questionnaires regarding fracture classification and preferred surgical approach. The same questionnaire was completed using only CT imaging, and two weeks later, using only 3-D printed models. The inter- and intra-observer agreement rates were then analyzed.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement rates based on CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate for fracture classification: κ = 0.44, κ = 0.55, respectively (P < 0.001) and fair for preferred surgical approach: κ = 0.34, κ = 0.29, respectively (P < 0.005). Intra-observer agreement rates for fracture classification and preferred surgical approach comparing CT imaging or 3-D printed models were moderate: κ = 0.48, κ = 0.41, respectively. No significant difference in intra-observer agreement was detected when comparing orthopedic pelvic specialists to general orthopedic traumatologists.

CONCLUSION

The Judet-Letournel classification demonstrated only moderate rates of agreement. The use of 3-D printed models increased the inter-observer agreement rates with respect to fracture classification, but decreased it with respect to the preferred surgical approach. This study highlights the role of 3-D printed models in acetabular fractures by improving spatial understanding of these complex injuries, thus providing more reliable fracture diagnoses and alternative viewpoints for pre-operative planning.

The Quadrilateral Plate in Acetabular Fracture Surgery: What Is It and When Should It Be Addressed?

The quadrilateral plate (QP) is the relatively flat surface of bone in the true pelvis lying directly medial to the acetabulum. This surface is frequently involved in acetabular fractures. Elderly individuals, in particular, commonly sustain anterior column fractures with incomplete or complete posterior hemitransverse fracture lines with associated QP comminution. If QP fracture lines propagate through the superior weight-bearing surface of the acetabulum, the femoral head may displace medially, leading to poor outcomes if not addressed. Fortunately, the collective work of many orthopaedic surgeons has resulted in numerous effective methods for approaching, reducing, and stabilizing the QP and the diverse family of fractures which affect it. A thorough understanding of the QP, its anatomy, radiology, and techniques for fixation, is required to optimize patient outcomes.

Open reduction and internal fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures in the elderly: association between initial fracture pattern and outcomes

Background

Acetabular fractures with medial displacement of the quadrilateral plate (QLP) are common in the elderly. The presence of QLP fractures greatly increase the surgical difficulty of acetabular fractures. This study aims to evaluate the clinical radiological outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in QLP fractures in elderly patients and to investigate factors potentially affecting the result.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study. A series of 37 consecutive patients with acetabular fracture involving the QLP aged 60 years and older who received ORIF between January 2010 and May 2019 were included. QLP fractures were classified according to Walid’s classification system. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using Matta criteria and functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Merle d’Aubigné score. The relationships between Walid’s classification and radiological or functional outcomes were analyzed.

Results

According to Walid’s classification, 18, 13, 6 were classified as QLP1, QLP2 and QLP3, respectively. The average follow-up was 35.5 ± 10.7 months. We obtained anatomic reduction in 48.6 % (18/37) of cases, imperfect reduction in 40.5 % (15/37) of cases, and poor reduction in 10.8 % (4/37) of cases. Excellent-good functional scores were found in 83.7 % (modified Merle d’Aubigné). There were no cases of screw entering the hip, pull-out and loosening or implant failure during the follow-up. Walid’s classification was positively correlated with radiological outcomes of reduction (r = 0.661; P < 0.001), and functional outcomes (r = 0.478; P = 0.003). Unsatisfactory reduction was demonstrated a correlation with the development of post-traumatic arthritis (r =-0.410; P = 0.012).

Conclusions

ORIF may be suggested for quadrilateral plate fractures in the elderly. Walid’s classification system is associated with the reduction quality and functional recovery.

Mapping of the Stable Articular Surface and Available Bone Corridors for Cup Fixation in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of acetabular fractures in the senior cohort is undetermined. Total hip arthroplasty in the setting of an acetabular fracture is increasing in popularity. However, there is concern regarding the fixation of a prosthetic cup in a fractured acetabulum. The purpose of this study is to map the area of stable articular surface and bone corridors available for cup fixation in this fracture cohort.

METHODS

CT scans of acetabular fractures in 131 consecutive geriatric patients older than 65 years from two level 1 academic trauma centers were analyzed. Acetabular fractures were classified using the Letournel classification, the available stable articular surface, and the bone corridors available for fixation.

RESULTS

Fractures involving the anterior column were the most common fracture type seen. The dome only pattern was the most common stable articular surface pattern. The sciatic corridor was available for fixation in all fracture types, followed by the gluteal pillar corridor. Most fractures had at least two corridors (93%) available for screw fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study may aid in the development and evaluation of fixation strategies for acetabular cups allowing geriatric acetabular fracture patients earlier weight bearing after primary hip arthroplasty.

Epidemiological assessment of acetabular fractures in a level one trauma centre: A 7-Year observational study

PURPOSE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of the Acetabular fractures treated in a level one trauma centre of India. This study is one of the largest to provide first-hand information regarding the demography, fracture patterns, other associated injuries, and the hospital stay of acetabular fractures in India.

METHOD

Patients admitted with the diagnosis of acetabular fractures between January 2013 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of demographic data such as age and sex, mechanism of injury, other associated injuries, and the duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients with 313 fractures of the acetabulum were included in the study. Among the 305 patients, 268 (87.8%) were male and 37 (12.1%) were female, with a declining male to female ratio over the years. The mean age was 37.1 ± 13.2 years (range 14-84 years). During the seven years, the mean age of presentation progressively increased. Linear regression showed an increase from 33 to 40 years from 2013 to 2019 (R2 = 0.027). Road traffic injuries were the most common mechanism of injury, contributing to about 77.4% of all cases. Associated injuries were seen in 62% of total cases with multiple system involvement in 26.6% of patients. The most frequent pattern in this epidemiological study was an isolated posterior wall fracture (21.4%) while the isolated anterior wall was the least frequent (0.95%).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular fractures are increasing in numbers and with increasing knowledge so is their surgical management in our country. It shall be prudent to establish an integrated electronic national trauma registry to maintain complete documentation in all institutions dealing with trauma management to ascertain the changing trends of acetabular fracture patterns in the country over time.

Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment

BACKGROUND

The Judet-Letournel classification has been widely used to diagnose acetabular fractures since it was proposed. However, there has been growing evidence of incompleteness and comprehension difficulty in this classification, which may adversely affect its clinical use. The purposes of this study were to introduce a novel 3-column classification system for acetabular fractures and to evaluate its reliability and reproducibility.

METHODS

A total of 1,028 patients with acetabular fractures, who had undergone surgical treatment from June 2011 to January 2017 in 7 level-I trauma centers, were recruited into this study. Preoperative radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were conducted for each patient. To evaluate the reproducibility of the 3-column classification system for acetabular fractures, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability (kappa coefficient, κ) of this classification system compared with those of the Judet-Letournel classification system was investigated by 4 observers.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients (20.33%) could not be classified by the Judet-Letournel classification, and 3 cases (0.29%) could not be classified by the novel 3-column classification. The mean κ value of the interobserver reliability for the Judet-Letournel classification was 0.591 (range, 0.508 to 0.681), indicating moderate agreement, whereas the mean κ value was 0.735 (range, 0.594 to 0.930), indicating substantial agreement, when using the 3-column classification. The mean κ value for the intraobserver reliability was 0.751 (range, 0.708 to 0.793) for the Judet-Letournel classification and 0.909 (range, 0.792 to 0.957) for the 3-column classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-column classification, based on the anatomic character of the acetabulum, showed higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability than the Judet-Letournel classification. Additionally, certain fracture patterns in the 3-column classification scheme generally correlated with surgical approaches. This novel classification system may be used as a supplement to the traditional Judet-Letournel classification system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The 3-column concept of the acetabulum proposed in this study is helpful to master acetabular fractures for less experienced surgeons. The novel classification system could assist with acetabular fracture diagnosis and the choice of surgical approaches.

Management of anteromedially displaced acetabular fractures using a collinear reduction clamp through modified ilioinguinal approach

The authors present a surgical technique using a collinear reduction clamp through the modified ilioinguinal approach (MIA) for anteromedially displaced acetabular fractures along with the surgical outcomes. Between October 2010 and June 2015, 15 patients underwent surgical treatment for anteromedially displaced acetabular fractures; 10 both-column fractures and 5 anterior column and posterior hemitransverse fractures. Anteriorly displaced anterior column fragment and medially displaced quadrilateral plate fragment were simultaneously reduced using a collinear clamp and fixed with a 3.5mm-reconstruction plate through MIA. Postoperatively, anatomical reduction was achieved in 12 patients, while imperfect reduction was achieved in 3. At a mean follow-up of 49.0 months (range, 24-93 months), the mean Postel Merle d'Aubigné score were 16.3 and the mean VAS score was 0.9. Final radiographic grades according to Matta system were excellent in 13 patients and good in 2. Surgical technique using a collinear reduction clamp through the MIA can provide satisfactory outcomes in anteromedially displaced acetabular fractures.

Imaging Acetabular Fractures

Acetabular fractures are encountered by radiologists in a wide spectrum of practice settings. The radiologist's value in the acute and long-term management of acetabular fractures is augmented by familiarity with systematic computed tomography-based algorithms that streamline and simplify Judet-Letournel fracture typing, together with an appreciation of the role of imaging in initial triage, operative decision making, postoperative assessment, prognostication, and evaluation of complications. The steep increase in incidence of acetabular fractures in the elderly over the past several decades places special emphasis on familiarity with geriatric fracture patterns.

The Relevance of the Judet and Letournel Acetabular Fracture Classification System in the Modern Era: A Review

The Judet and Letournel acetabular fracture classification system, based on the idea of bicolumnar support of the acetabulum, was first described in a landmark article published in the 1960s. It has stood the test of time and continues to be the preferred method for describing acetabular fractures for the majority of orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Still, there have been attempts to modify or replace Letournel system since its introduction for a variety of reasons, chief among them a perceived inability of the classification system to account for a number of transitional fracture patterns and injury modifiers that may affect surgical decision making and patient outcomes. In this review, we present the literature related to the Judet and Letournel acetabular fracture classification system, over 50 years after its first formal description. We summarize its strengths, weaknesses, and its place in our current understanding of acetabular fractures and their recommended management.