Medical Costs of Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery

Surgical timing and clinical factor predicting in-hospital mortality in older adults with hip fractures: a neuronal network analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures in older adults are associated with a significant mortality rate, which has been reported to be around 35% within a year. Today, the incidence of these fractures is on the rise, and this trend is expected to increase even more owing to the aging of the population. Treatment timing and perioperative management of these patients are typically challenging owing to the presence of multiple comorbidities that are important risk factors for mortality after surgery. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between surgical timing and in-hospital mortality, analyzing the role of both acute events and chronic preexisting comorbidities in patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective observational study (from January 2018 until June 2023). All consecutive patients ≥ 65 years with a diagnosis of proximal femur fracture were enrolled. The primary study endpoint was to evaluate risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoint was the assessment of the relationship between surgical timing and in-hospital mortality, including factors such as preexisting comorbidities, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score. The relative weight of each factor for predicting the mortality rate was also evaluated using neural network analysis, comparing patients treated within 24 h to those treated after a longer surgical delay.

RESULTS

Among the 2320 patients enrolled, 1391 (60%) underwent surgery within 24 h, while 929 patients (40%) were treated after 24 h. For patients who underwent surgery within 24 h, the in-hospital mortality was 2.8%, and for those who underwent surgery after 24 h, it was 5.2% (p = 0.046; odds ratio (OR) 1.58). Age (p = 0.001; OR 1.06) and Nottingham score (p = 0.04; OR 1.32) are factors predicting mortality. Acute infections were related to a high risk of mortality (p = 0.001; OR 5.99), both in patients treated within and after 24 h. Acute events, such as atrial fibrillation and electrolyte imbalance, were related to mortality risk only in patients treated within 24 h (p = 0.001 versus p = 0.51). Neural network analysis revealed that atrial fibrillation (AF), flutter, and electrolyte imbalance had the highest relative weight for mortality in patients treated in the first 24 h; by contrast, renal failure and pneumonia were most present in patients who died that were treated after 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip fracture is known to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. The impact of the timing of surgical treatment in those patients is crucial for postoperative outcomes. Early surgery is essential to reduce the risk of mortality. Our study has shown that, while in the case of acute and reversible conditions, waiting about 24 h to stabilize the patient with preoperative stabilization protocols, such as managing anticoagulation, optimizing hemodynamics, or addressing acute medical conditions including infection prevention, guarantees better results, in the case of sepsis or acute infection presence, the prolonged waiting to optimize patients before and after surgery does not help improve outcomes.

Early effect of a financial incentive for surgeries within 48 h after hip fracture on the number of expedited hip fracture surgeries, in-hospital mortality, perioperative morbidity, length of stay and inpatient medical expenses

OBJECTIVE

To examine the early effects of the financial incentive (FI) implemented in April 2022 in Japan for surgeries within 48 h after hip fracture (HF) in patients aged 75 and older on expedited HF surgery (EHFS), in-hospital mortality, perioperative morbidity, length of stay (LOS) and inpatient medical expenses (IMEs).

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

We conducted a quasi-experimental study and constructed segmented regression models for controlled interrupted time-series analyses, assuming a Poisson distribution, to evaluate the slope changes (SCs) in the outcomes of interest before and after the introduction of the FI.

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

We used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from the Quality Indicator/Improvement Project database between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2023. Patients aged 50 years or older who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of HF and underwent surgery for HF were included.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

A total of 82,163 patients from 183 hospitals were included in the analyses. In the age group of 75 years and older, increasing trends in the number of EHFSs were observed even before the introduction of the FI, while before and after the introduction of the FI, none of the SCs in the monthly number of EHFSs within 2 days, within 1 day, and on the day of admission were statistically significant (incident rate ratio: 1.0043, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.9977-1.0111], 1.0068 [0.9987-1.0149], 1.0073 [0.9930-1.0219]). Nor were any of the SCs in in-hospital deaths, perioperative complications, LOS, and IMEs statistically significant. Additionally, there were no statistical differences in the SCs for any of the outcomes between the two age groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that there was no significant, short-term effect of the FI for surgeries within 48 h after HF on any of the outcomes of interest.

A Dedicated Hip Fracture Care Coordinator Is Associated With Improved Patient Outcomes and Hospital Quality Measures

ABSTRACT

This study aims to identify if there are significant differences in hospital quality measures between hip fracture patients who were treated under the management of a dedicated Hip Fracture Care Coordinator (HFCC) and those who were not. An institutional review board-approved hip fracture registry was queried for patients who were admitted at an orthopedic hospital under the care of HFCC from October 2021 to April 2023 (2.5 years). A comparison cohort of patients was obtained from reviewing patients in the 2.5 years (April 2019-October 2021) before the hiring of the HFCC. Univariable comparisons and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of the HFCC on outcomes such as hospital quality measures, inpatient complications, discharge location, and readmission and mortality rates. One thousand fifty-six hip fracture patients were identified: 532 (50.4%) without-HFCC and 524 (49.6%) HFCC. When controlling for covariates using binary logistic regression, the presence of an HFCC was associated with a higher likelihood of home discharge (odds ratio = 2.481, p < .001). Regression analyses demonstrated similar benefits of the HFCC with outcome variables such as intensive care unit stay (p < .001) and time to surgery (p < .001). This study demonstrates an association between the HFCC and improved outcomes for both patients and the hospital system.

Risk factors of postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality after hip fracture among patients older than 80 years old: a retrospective study

INDUCTION

The mortality and morbidity in hip fracture is a big healthcare burden. How to identify risk patients preoperatively is important. The aim of study was to evaluate the risk factors of postoperative complications and mortality in patients older than 80 years old after hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

Patients older than 80 years old with the diagnosis of hip fracture who had surgical treatment from February 2013 to June 2021 at a single center in China were included for analysis. The primary outcome were postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality. Binary logistic regression was used to confirm the relationship between preoperative factors and postoperative complications/mortality.

RESULTS

498 patients were included for analysis. 176 patients developed 265 episodes of complications and the incidence of postoperative complication was 35.3%. Postoperative pulmonary infection was the most common complication, followed by cardiovascular complications and postoperative delirium. And there were 10 postoperative in-hospital deaths (2.0%). Preoperative Charlson comorbidity index(CCI) was associated with postoperative complications (OR = 1.243, 95%CI 1.020-1.516, P = 0.031) and mortality (OR = 2.303, 95%CI 1.351-3.925, P = 0.002). However, American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was not an independent risk factor for postoperative complication and mortality.

CONCLUSION

CCI was the risk factor of poor postoperative outcome for patients older than 80 years old after hip fracture surgery. And CCI can be used as the potential tool of risk stratification for this group of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study had been registered in www.chictr.org.cn and the registration ID was ChiCTR2400085291 on June 4th 2024.

Economic evaluation of a strategy to shorten the time to surgery with neuraxial anaesthesia compared with usual clinical practice in patients on chronic antiplatelet therapy with a proximal femur fracture

Introduction

Before implementing a new health care strategy, it is important to assess effectiveness but also to perform an economic evaluation. The goal of the present study was to perform a comparative economic evaluation of a new strategy aimed at using proposed implementation of the Plateletworks guidance (measurement of platelet function) with usual practice (delayed time to surgery) in patients on chronic antiplatelet treatment and scheduled for surgery with neuraxial anaesthesia due to proximal femur fracture.

Methods

This is an economic evaluation carried out alongside a randomised controlled clinical trial at four centres in Spain. Patients were randomised to undergo either early platelet function-guided surgery (experimental group) or delayed surgery (control group). As AFFEcT trial results demonstrated significative difference between groups in the primary efficacy endpoint, the median time to surgery, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Direct costs associated with hospitalisation until one-month post-discharge were considered and measured from a hospital perspective. All costs were reported in euros. Analyses were performed on a per protocol basis. Effectiveness outcome measures were the incremental cost and incremental cost per reduction in days to surgery. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was implemented to quantify uncertainty.

Results

A total of 156 patients were randomized to the two groups (n = 78 per group). A total of 143 patients were included in the per protocol population (75 and 68 patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively). The median time to surgery was 2.30 days (IQR: 1.53-3.73) in the experimental group and 4.87 days (4.36-5.60) in the control group (a reduction of 2.40 days). Total costs during the 1-month study perioperative period were higher in the delayed surgery group (€18,495.19) than for the early surgery group (€16,497.59). The incremental cost was negative (€1,997.60), a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). As measured by the reduction in time (days) to surgery, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for early surgery was negative (777.28€/day). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated consistent cost saving.

Conclusion

For patients on chronic antiplatelet treatment scheduled to undergo surgery for proximal femur fracture, an individualised strategy guided by a platelet function testing is a cost-saving and cost-effective strategy.

Disparities Exist in Knowledge of Hip Fracture Compared With Stroke and Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

This study sought to answer the following questions: (1) Are there differences in knowledge on time to treatment (TTT) between stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and hip fractures in the general population? (2) Are there differences in condition-specific knowledge across these conditions? (3) Are there underlying demographic factors that may contribute to differences in hip fracture-specific knowledge?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional cohort analysis. Participants were acquired using an online survey distribution platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Individuals older than 18 years with English fluency and literacy were included. A total of 913 participants who completed a survey with questions on TTT knowledge, condition-specific knowledge, history of hip fracture, and demographics were recruited.

RESULTS

On comparing TTT knowledge, the MI mean score was 36.92% higher than that of hip fractures (P<.0001). On comparing condition-specific knowledge, the MI-specific mean score was 8.24% higher than that of hip fractures (P<.0001). Hip fracture knowledge was associated with demographic factors. Asian and Black participants and participants with Medicaid or Medicare as their primary insurance type were associated with significantly lower hip fracture knowledge.

CONCLUSION

Hip fracture knowledge was significantly lower than MI knowledge in the study population. Just as professional societies have invested resources in public education campaigns on the importance of TTT for stroke and MI, public education campaigns on the importance of TTT for hip fractures may support earlier TTT for populations vulnerable to delays (Asian and Black). [Orthopedics. 20XX;4X(X):XXX-XXX.].

Early surgical treatment using regional clinical pathways to reduce the length of postoperative hospital stay in hip fracture patients: A retrospective analysis using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database

Hip fracture is a common injury in older adults; however, the optimal timing of surgical treatment remains undetermined in Japan. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to ascertain the rate of early surgery among hip fracture patients and investigate its effectiveness, along with "regional clinical pathways" (patient plan of care devised by Japanese clinicians), in reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS) postoperatively. We hypothesized that performing early surgery along with a regional clinical pathway is effective to reduce the postoperative LOS and complications among hip fracture patients. We examined the data of patients diagnosed with femoral neck and peritrochanteric fractures retrieved from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2016 and March 2018. Patients were divided into the early (43,928, 34%; surgery within 2 days of admission) and delayed (84,237, 66%; surgery after 2 days of admission) surgery groups. The difference in postoperative LOS between the two groups was 3 days (early vs. delayed: 29 days vs. 32 days). The early surgery group had more cases of intertrochanteric fractures (57% vs. 43%) and internal fixation (74% vs. 55%) than did the delayed surgery group. In contrast, the delayed surgery group had more cases of femoral neck fractures (43% vs. 57%) and bipolar hip arthroplasty (25% vs. 42%) or total hip arthroplasty (1.2% vs. 3.0%). Moreover, the early surgery group showed a lower incidence of complications, except anemia (12% vs. 8.8%). Logistic regression analysis using the adjusted model revealed that early surgery and implementation of regional clinical pathways reduced LOS by 2.58 and 8.06 days, respectively (p<0.001). Early surgery and implementation of regional clinical pathways for hip fracture patients are effective in reducing postoperative LOS, allowing regional clinical pathways to have a greater impact. These findings will help acute care providers when treating hip fracture patients.

Comparison of acute outcomes from elective total hip replacements and after fragility femoral neck fractures in nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

Hip hemiarthroplasty has traditionally been used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in older, frailer patients whilst total hip replacements (THR) have been reserved for younger and fitter patients. However, not all elderly patients are frail, and some may be able to tolerate and benefit from an acute THR. Nonagenarians are a particularly heterogenous subpopulation of the elderly, with varying degrees of independence. Since THRs are performed electively as a routine treatment for osteoarthritis in the elderly, its safety is well established in the older patient. The aim of this study was to compare the safety of emergency THR to elective THR in nonagenarians.

METHODS

A retrospective 10-year cohort study was conducted using data submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) across three hospitals in one large NHS Trust. Data was collected from 126 nonagenarians who underwent THRs between 1st January 2010 - 31st December 2020 and was categorised into emergency THR and elective THR groups. Mortality rates were compared between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were also compared including postoperative complications (dislocations, revision surgeries, and periprosthetic fracture), length of stay in hospital, and discharge destination.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups, with 1-year mortality rates of 11.4% and 12.1% reported for emergency and elective patients respectively (p = 0.848). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate and discharge destination. Patients who had emergency THR spent 5.56 days longer in hospital compared to elective patients (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

There is no increased risk of 1-year mortality in emergency THR compared to elective THR, in a nonagenarian population. Therefore, nonagenarians presenting with a hip fracture who would have been considered for a THR if presenting on an elective basis should not be precluded from an emergency THR on safety grounds.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not necessary as this was deemed not to be clinical research, and was considered to be a service evaluation.

Machine learning applications for the prediction of extended length of stay in geriatric hip fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals, and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications. Machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models. This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay (eLOS) among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.

AIM

To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures, identify associated risk factors, and compare the performance of each model.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre, enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022. The study collected various patient characteristics, encompassing demographic data, general health status, injury-related data, laboratory examinations, surgery-related data, and length of stay. Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified. The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.

RESULTS

The study included 763 patients, with 380 experiencing eLOS. Among the models, the decision tree, random forest, and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance. Notably, the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results. After cross-validation, the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance. Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery, D-dimer level, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, type of surgery, and sex.

CONCLUSION

ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures. The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery, D-dimer level, ASA classification, type of surgery, and sex. This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.

Artificial Intelligence for Hip Fracture Detection and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Artificial intelligence (AI) enables powerful models for establishment of clinical diagnostic and prognostic tools for hip fractures; however the performance and potential impact of these newly developed algorithms are currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of AI algorithms designed to diagnose hip fractures on radiographs and predict postoperative clinical outcomes following hip fracture surgery relative to current practices.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for all articles published from database inception to January 23, 2023. A manual reference search of included articles was also undertaken to identify any additional relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies developing machine learning (ML) models for the diagnosis of hip fractures from hip or pelvic radiographs or to predict any postoperative patient outcome following hip fracture surgery were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and was registered with PROSPERO. Eligible full-text articles were evaluated and relevant data extracted independently using a template data extraction form. For studies that predicted postoperative outcomes, the performance of traditional predictive statistical models, either multivariable logistic or linear regression, was recorded and compared with the performance of the best ML model on the same out-of-sample data set.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy of AI models was compared with the diagnostic accuracy of expert clinicians using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Areas under the curve for postoperative outcome prediction between traditional statistical models (multivariable linear or logistic regression) and ML models were compared.

RESULTS

Of 39 studies that met all criteria and were included in this analysis, 18 (46.2%) used AI models to diagnose hip fractures on plain radiographs and 21 (53.8%) used AI models to predict patient outcomes following hip fracture surgery. A total of 39 598 plain radiographs and 714 939 hip fractures were used for training, validating, and testing ML models specific to diagnosis and postoperative outcome prediction, respectively. Mortality and length of hospital stay were the most predicted outcomes. On pooled data analysis, compared with clinicians, the OR for diagnostic error of ML models was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.48-1.31; P = .36; I2 = 60%) for hip fracture radiographs. For the ML models, the mean (SD) sensitivity was 89.3% (8.5%), specificity was 87.5% (9.9%), and F1 score was 0.90 (0.06). The mean area under the curve for mortality prediction was 0.84 with ML models compared with 0.79 for alternative controls (P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the potential applications of AI to aid with diagnosis from hip radiographs are promising. The performance of AI in diagnosing hip fractures was comparable with that of expert radiologists and surgeons. However, current implementations of AI for outcome prediction do not seem to provide substantial benefit over traditional multivariable predictive statistics.

The Effect of Warfarin Use on Postoperative Outcomes after Femoral Neck Surgery

Introduction: Anticoagulation use in the elderly is common for patients undergoing femoral neck hip surgery. However, its use presents a challenge to balance it with associated comorbidities and benefits for the patients. As such, we attempted to compare the risk factors, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes of patients who used warfarin preoperatively and patients who used therapeutic enoxaparin. Methods: From 2003 through 2014, we queried our database to determine the cohorts of patients who used warfarin preoperatively and the patients who used therapeutic enoxaparin. Risk factors included age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30, Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), and Chronic Renal Failure (CRF). Postoperative outcomes were also collected at each of the patients' follow-up visits, including number of hospitalization days, delays to theatre, and mortality rate. Results: The minimum follow-up was 24 months and the average follow-up was 39 months (range: 24-60 months). In the warfarin cohort, there were 140 patients and 2055 patients in the therapeutic enoxaparin cohort. Number of hospitalization days (8.7 vs. 9.8, p = 0.02), mortality rate (58.7% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.003), and delays to theatre (1.70 vs. 2.86, p < 0.0001) were significantly longer for the anticoagulant cohort than the therapeutic enoxaparin cohort. Warfarin use best predicted number of hospitalization days (p = 0.00) and delays to theatre (p = 0.01), while CHF was the best predictor of mortality rate (p = 0.00). Postoperative complications, such as Pulmonary Embolism (PE) (p = 0.90), Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (p = 0.31), and Cerebrovascular Accidents (CVA) (p = 0.72), pain levels (p = 0.95), full weight-bearing status (p = 0.08), and rehabilitation use (p = 0.34) were similar between the cohorts. Conclusion: Warfarin use is associated with increased number of hospitalization days and delays to theatre, but does not affect the postoperative outcome, including DVT, CVA, and pain levels compared to therapeutic enoxaparin use. Warfarin use proved to be the best predictor of hospitalization days and delays to theatre while CHF predicted mortality rate.

A population-based study of the direct longitudinal health care costs of upper extremity trauma in patients aged 18-65 years

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity (UE) trauma represents a common reason for emergency department visits, but the longitudinal economic burden of this public health issue is unknown. This study assessed the 3-year attributable health care use and expenditure after UE trauma requiring acute surgical intervention, with specific focus on injuries that affect function of the hand and wrist.

METHODS

We conducted an incidence-based, propensity score-matched cohort study (2006-2014) in Ontario, Canada, using linked administrative health care data to identify case patients and matched control patients. We matched adults with hand, wrist and UE nerve trauma requiring surgery 1:4 to control patients. We compared total direct health care costs, including 1-year pre-index costs, between case and control patients using a differences-in-difference methodology. The primary outcome was attributable health care costs within 3 years of injury.

RESULTS

We matched patients with trauma (n = 26 123) to noninjured patients (n = 104 353). Mean direct health care costs attributable to UE trauma were $9210 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8880 to 9550) within 3 years. Patients with trauma had significantly more emergency department visits (≥ 3 visits: 25% v. 12%; p < 0.001), mental health visits (34% v. 28%; p < 0.05) and secondary surgeries (25% v. 5%; p < 0.001). Specific patient populations had significantly greater attributable costs: patients requiring post-traumatic mental health visits ($11 360 v. $7090; p < 0.001), inpatient surgery ($14 060 v. $5940, p < 0.001) and complex injuries ($13 790 v. $7930; p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Health care expenditure increased more than fivefold in the year after UE trauma surgery and remained greater than the matched cohort for the subsequent 2 years. Those with more serious injuries and post-injury visits for mental health were associated with higher costs, requiring further study for this public health issue. The mean 1-year pre-injury and 1-year post-injury total costs were $1710 and $9350, respectively.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Extended Length of Stay in Older Adults with Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2132 Patients

We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with an extended length of hospital stay (eLOS) in older hip-fracture patients and to explore the relationships between eLOS and mortality and functional outcomes. In this retrospective analysis of surgically treated intertrochanteric fracture (IF) patients, all variables were obtained and compared between the eLOS group and the normal LOS group. All participants were followed-up for a minimum of two years and the relation between the eLOS and all-cause mortality and functional outcomes were compared. After adjustment for potential confounders, we identified that patients with high modified Elixhauser's Comorbidity Measure (mECM) had the highest likelihood of eLOS, followed by obesity, admission in winter, living in urban, pulmonary complications, admission in autumn, and time from injury to surgery. In addition, our results showed no significant difference in the mortality and functional outcomes between the two groups during follow-up. By identifying these risk factors in the Chinese geriatric population, it may be possible to risk-stratify IF patients and subsequently streamline inpatient resource utilization. However, the differences between health care systems must be taken into consideration. Future studies are needed to preemptively target the modifiable risk factors to demonstrate benefits in diminishing eLOS.

Does delaying surgery for "healthy" hip fracture patients have increased complications and mortality?

INTRODUCTION

Surgical delay is one of the risk factors for mortality and morbidity in patients with HF. One of the causes of delay is due to admission on Thursday-Friday, weekends, holidays or previous periods. The final objective of this study is to analyze administrative-organizational delay in complication and mortality rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 607 cases of surgically operated hip fractures were analyzed. Two groups were established, one of them operated on in < 48 h (ND group) and the other surgically delayed for administrative organizational reasons (AA group). Demographic variables related to treatment and fracture were analyzed in both groups, as well as the rates of surgical wound complications, general complications and mortality rate in the first 30 days, in the first year and more than one year after surgery.

RESULTS

We observed a surgical wound seroma and staining rate of 15.7% in the AA group and 9.6% in the ND group; and a surgical wound surface infection rate of 1.9% in the AA group and 0.8% in the ND group (p = 0.275). General complications occurred in 34.4% (AA group) and 29% (ND group). The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% in the AA group and 1.9% in the ND group (p = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

We found no statistically significant differences in patients delayed for administrative reasons in terms of mortality and surgical wound and general complication rates. Although the proportion of surgical wound complications and 30-day mortality was higher in the AA group versus the ND group.

Differences in hospital length of stay and total hospital charge by income level in patients hospitalized for hip fractures

This study examines the difference in length of stay and total hospital charge by income quartile in hip fracture patients. The length of stay increased in lower income groups, while total charge demonstrated a U-shaped relationship, with the highest charges in the highest and lowest income quartiles.

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic factors have an impact on outcomes in hip fracture patients. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in hospital length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charge between income quartiles in hospitalized hip fracture patients.

METHODS

National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2016 to 2018 was used to determine differences in LOS, total charge, and other demographic/clinical outcomes by income quartile in patients hospitalized for hip fracture. Multivariate regressions were performed for both LOS and total hospital charge to determine variable impact and significance.

RESULTS

There were 860,045 hip fracture patients were included this study. With 222,625 in the lowest income quartile, 234,215 in the second, 215,270 in the third, and 190,395 in the highest income quartile. LOS decreased with increase in income quartile. Total charge was highest in the highest quartile, while it was lowest in the middle two-quartiles. Comorbidities with the largest magnitude of effect on both LOS and total charge were lung disease, kidney disease, and heart disease. Time to surgery post-admission also had a large effect on both outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that income quartile has an effect on both hospital LOS and total charge. This may be the result of differences in demographics and other clinical variables between quartiles and increased comorbidities in lower income levels. The overall summation of these socioeconomic, demographic, and medical factors affecting patients in lower income levels may result in worse outcomes following hip fracture.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hip Fracture Surgery Care in the United States From 2006 to 2015: A Nationwide Trends Study

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in the surgical treatment of hip fractures have been previously reported, demonstrating delayed time to surgery and worse perioperative outcomes for minority patients. However, data are lacking on how these disparities have trended over time and whether national efforts have succeeded in reducing them. The aim of this study was to investigate temporal trends in racial and ethnic disparities in perioperative metrics for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery in the United States from 2006 to 2015.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2006 and 2015. Perioperative metrics, including delayed time to surgery (≥2 calendar days from admission to surgical intervention), length of stay (LOS), total inpatient complications, and mortality, were trended over time. Changes in racial and ethnic disparities were assessed using linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were persistent disparities in delayed time to surgery for White versus Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients (eg, White versus Black: 30.1% versus 39.7% in 2006 and 22% versus 28.8% in 2015, Ptrend> 0.05 for all). Although disparities in total LOS remained consistent for White versus Black patients (Ptrend= 0.97), these disparities improved for White versus Hispanic and Asian patients (eg, White versus Hispanic: 4.8 days versus 5.3 in 2006 and 4.1 days versus 4.4 in 2015, Ptrend < 0.05 for both).

DISCUSSION

Racial and ethnic disparities were persistent in time to surgery and discharge disposition for hip fracture surgery between White and minority patients from 2006 to 2015 in the United States. These disparities particularly affected Black patients. Although there were encouraging signs of improving disparities in the LOS, these findings highlight the need for renewed orthopaedic initiatives and healthcare reform policies aimed at reducing perioperative disparities in orthopaedic trauma care.

A Comparison of Acute Complications and Mortality Between Geriatric Knee and Hip Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

To compare acute complication and mortality rates for operatively treated, closed, isolated, low-energy geriatric knee fractures (distal femur [DFF] or tibial plateau [TPF]) with hip fractures (HFs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We identified all patients ≥ 70 years from 2011 to 2016 who underwent surgery for DFF, TPF, or HF. We recorded patient demographics, functional status, complications, and mortality. We matched DFF:TPF:HF patients on a 1:1:10 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, baseline functional status, and comorbidity. We used the chi square, Fisher exact, and Mann Whitney U tests to compare unadjusted differences between groups and multivariable logistic regression to compare the risk of complications, readmission, or death while adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

When compared with HF, patients in the DFF and TPF groups had longer length of stay and time to index surgery and were more likely to be discharged home. The rate of deep vein thrombosis was significantly higher in the TPF group (TPF = 3.9%, DFF = 1.3%, and HF = 1.2%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric knee fractures pose a similar risk of acute complications, mortality, and readmission compared with patients with HF. Future studies investigating strategies to decrease risk in this patient cohort are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

COVID-19 Shelter-In-Place Orders Associated With Delayed Presentation and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Geriatric Hip Fractures

Geriatric hip fractures benefit from timely surgery. At the onset of the corona-virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, shelter-in-place (SIP) orders were mandated in high-risk cities. The authors hypothesized that geriatric patients with hip fractures were more likely to present to the hospital greater than 24 hours after injury during SIP orders. They retrospectively reviewed patients 65 years or older who presented with hip fractures between March 20, 2020, and May 24, 2020 (SIP group), and between March 20, 2019, and May 24, 2019 (historical group). Primary outcomes were incidence of presentation greater than 24 hours after injury and mean number of days between injury and presentation. Secondary outcomes were incidence of preoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 30- and 90-day mortality rates. Thirty-three patients comprised the SIP group, and 50 patients comprised the historical group. There were no significant differences in their demographics or medical comorbidities. The SIP group was more likely to present greater than 24 hours after injury (P=.05) and presented a greater number of days after injury (P=.02). There was a significant difference in the incidence of preoperative DVT (P=.03). There were no significant differences in 30- and 90-day mortality rates. Geriatric patients who sustained hip fractures during SIP restrictions for COVID-19 were more likely to present greater than 24 hours after injury, have a greater number of days between injury and presentation, and be diagnosed with a preoperative DVT. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):223-228.].

Sociodemographic and health system factors associated with variations in hospitalization costs for fractures in adults aged 45 years and over: a cross-sectional study of provincial health accounts in Jiangsu Province, China

This study reports hospitalization costs of fracture in Chinese patients aged over 45 years and evaluates their related factors in different fracture groups.

PURPOSE

To report hospitalization costs of treating fractures in Chinese patients aged over 45 years and to investigate the sociodemographic and health system factors related to variation in the costs.

METHODS

Study participants were selected from the 2016 Health Accounts Database in Jiangsu in which patients' hospitalization costs were kept at various levels in hospitals. A multi-stage stratified sampling method was used to select study participants. Electronic medical records of patients aged 45 years and over with fractures were included. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) was used to identify patients who were hospitalized due to fractures. A generalized linear model was used to estimate the extent to which a range of health system and sociodemographic factors were associated with the variation on hospitalization costs. Costs data were presented and analyzed using 2016 U.S. dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 39,300 patients were included in the study. Vertebra, tibia/fibula, and hip were the most frequent fracture sites. The mean (median) of hospitalization cost of included fractures ranged from USD 3142 (USD 2420) for hand and wrist fractures to USD 10,355 (USD 9673) for hip fractures. Longer length of hospital stay, higher hospital level, and being covered by a health insurance were associated with higher hospitalization costs for all fracture types.

CONCLUSION

Our study reports hospital costs of the fracture using a large health accounts database in China and investigates the associated factors of hospital costs. Our results may inform cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of fracture preventions.

FROST: Factors Predicting Orthopaedic Trauma Volumes

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic surgeons often speculate weather and season impact the nature and volume of surgical trauma. Little evidence exists to support this. We aimed to identify the relationship between weather conditions, time of year, surgical orthopaedic trauma volumes, after-hours surgery, and surgical wait times.

METHODS

Unscheduled surgical orthopaedic cases were retrospectively reviewed at major adult hospitals in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, over an eleven-year period (2008-2018). Weather variables were gathered and a predictive model for ice was generated. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine the effect of weather and time of year on orthopaedic trauma volumes and after-hours surgery. Linear regression was used to investigate surgical wait times.

RESULTS

41,421 unscheduled orthopaedic trauma surgeries were analyzed against daily weather patterns. 49% of all surgery performed was for hip (26.4%) or ankle fractures (22.6%). Same day snow (p=0.002) and ice for two days prior (p=0.031; p=0.003) were significantly associated with increased overall trauma volumes. Same day snow (p<0.001) and ice (p=0.002), as well as ice two days prior (p=0.001), predicted a significant increase in ankle fracture volumes. There was no correlation between weather patterns and hip fracture volumes. Independent of weather, time of year was highly predictive of large swings in orthopaedic trauma volumes and increased wait times. Generally, when patient volumes increased so did after-hours surgery.

CONCLUSION

Winter and summer months as well as ice and daily snow contributed to the most significant increases in overall orthopaedic trauma volumes. On a snowy day in February with ice present for three consecutive days, trauma volumes increased as much as 71%. Despite this, resources dedicated to orthopaedic trauma are consistent throughout the year, which highlights the need to allocate resources for orthopaedic trauma surgery based on seasonal demands. We suggest our predictive model be used to guide the amount of operating room time reserved for orthopaedic trauma to better reflect expected volumes. This contrasts the current system which relies on after-hours surgeries and increased patient wait-times to compensate for increased orthopaedic trauma volumes. Since orthopaedic trauma can be predicted by weather patterns, interventions should aim to decrease weather-related orthopaedic trauma and reduce the burden prolonged wait times have on our system.

The association between surgical fixation of hip fractures within 24 hours and mortality : a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time to surgical intervention from admission on mortality and morbidity for patients with hip fractures.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to June 2020. Reference lists were manually assessed to identify additional papers. Primary comparative research studies that recruited patients aged over 60 years, with non-pathological primary proximal femoral fractures that were treated surgically, were included. Studies that did not include a group operated on within 24 hours or which reported time to surgery in calendar days were excluded. Two investigators extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. The pre-defined primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality at other time points. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were aggregated and were grouped by study-level characteristics.

RESULTS

This review included 46 studies (January 1991 to June 2020), comprising 521,857 hip fractures with 64,047 postoperative deaths. No randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. In a pooled analysis of 15 studies, RR of mortality at 30 days comparing time to surgery < 24 hours with > 24 hours was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.91; I 2 = 69%; 95% CI 50% to 81%; p-value for heterogeneity < 0.001). The association was stronger in observational studies that did not adjust for confounders than in those that adjusted for multiple covariates. In a pooled analysis of six studies, the RR of mortality at 30 days comparing time to surgery < 24 hours with 24 to 36 hours was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93; I 2 = 65%; 95% CI 16% to 85%; p-value for heterogeneity = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates reduced mortality for patients operated within 24 hours compared with those operated on beyond 24 hours or within 24 to 36 hours. Where resources allow and there is no specific reversible contraindication to early surgery, we recommend that hip fractures should be surgically treated within 24 hours. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1176-1186.

Effects of hospital funding reform on wait times for hip fracture surgery: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis

Background

Health care funding reforms are being used worldwide to improve system performance but may invoke unintended consequences. We assessed the effects of introducing a targeted hospital funding model, based on fixed price and volume, for hip fractures. We hypothesized the policy change was associated with reduction in wait times for hip fracture surgery, increase in wait times for non-hip fracture surgery, and increase in the incidence of after-hours hip fracture surgery.

Methods

This was a population-based, interrupted time series analysis of 49,097 surgeries for hip fractures, 10,474 for ankle fractures, 1,594 for tibial plateau fractures, and 40,898 for appendectomy at all hospitals in Ontario, Canada between April 2012 and March 2017. We used segmented regression analysis of interrupted monthly time series data to evaluate the impact of funding reform enacted April 1, 2014 on wait time for hip fracture repair (from hospital presentation to surgery) and after-hours provision of surgery (occurring between 1700 and 0700 h). To assess potential adverse consequences of the reform, we also evaluated two control procedures, ankle and tibial plateau fracture surgery. Appendectomy served as a non-orthopedic tracer for assessment of secular trends.

Results

The difference (95 % confidence interval) between the actual mean wait time and the predicted rate had the policy change not occurred was − 0.46 h (-3.94 h, 3.03 h) for hip fractures, 1.46 h (-3.58 h, 6.50 h) for ankle fractures, -3.22 h (-39.39 h, 32.95 h) for tibial plateau fractures, and 0.33 h (-0.57 h, 1.24 h) for appendectomy (Figure 1; Table 3). The difference (95 % confidence interval) between the actual and predicted percentage of surgeries performed after-hours − 0.90 % (-3.91 %, 2.11 %) for hip fractures, -3.54 % (-11.25 %, 4.16 %) for ankle fractures, 7.09 % (-7.97 %, 22.14 %) for tibial plateau fractures, and 1.07 % (-2.45 %, 4.59 %) for appendectomy.

Conclusions

We found no significant effects of a targeted hospital funding model based on fixed price and volume on wait times or the provision of after-hours surgery. Other approaches for improving hip fracture wait times may be worth pursuing instead of funding reform.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06601-2.

Perioperative outcomes following preoperative epidural analgesia in hip fracture patients undergoing surgical repair: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness and safety of epidural analgesia in the presurgical period on hip fracture patients undergoing surgical repair.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO systematic reviews register: CRD42019140396. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing preoperative epidural analgesia to other forms of pain management in hip fracture patients. The primary outcomes included perioperative cardiac events and mortality. Pain, non-cardiac complications, and adverse effects were also examined as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity of the included studies was assessed using the I2 statistic and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted once sufficient homogeneity was demonstrated.

RESULTS

Four studies met the inclusion criteria, which included a total of 221 patients. Preoperative epidural analgesia resulted in fewer cardiac events, which was a reported outcome in two included studies (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.63; I2 = 0%). Preoperative epidural analgesia was also associated with decreased perioperative mortality in a meta-analysis of two studies (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.98; I2 = 0%). Pain was not pooled due to variability in assessment methods, but preoperative epidural analgesia was associated with reduced pain in all four studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative epidural analgesia for hip fracture may reduce perioperative cardiac events and mortality, but the number of included studies in this systematic review was low. More research should be done to determine the benefit of early epidural analgesia for hip fractured patients.

Risk Factors Associated With Extended Length of Hospital Stay After Geriatric Hip Fracture

Introduction:

Within the geriatric hip fracture population, there exists a subset of patients whose length of inpatient hospital stay is excessive relative to the average. A better understanding of the risk factors associated with this group would be of value so that targeted prevention efforts can be properly directed. The goal of this study was to identify and characterize the risk factors associated with an extended length of hospital stay (eLOS) in the geriatric hip fracture population. In addition, a statistical model was created to predict the probability of eLOS in a geriatric hip fracture patient.

Methods:

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005 to 2018) was searched for patients aged ≥65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery. Patients with a hospital stay greater than or equal to 14 days were considered to have an eLOS. A multivariate logistic regression model using 24 patient characteristics from two-thirds of the study population was created to determine independent risk factors predictive of having an eLOS; the remaining one-third of the population was used for internal model validation. Regression analyses were performed to determine preoperative and postoperative risk factors for having an eLOS.

Results:

A total of 77,144 patients were included in the study. Preoperatively, male sex, dyspnea, ventilator use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologist class 3 and 4, and increased admission-to-operation time were among the factors associated with higher odds of having an eLOS (all P < 0.001). Postoperatively, patients with acute renal failure had the highest likelihood of eLOS (odds ratio [OR] 7.664), followed by ventilator use >48 hours (OR 4.784) and pneumonia (OR 4.332).

Discussion:

Among geriatric hip fracture patients, particular efforts should be directed toward optimizing those with preoperative risk factors for eLOS. Preemptive measures to target the postoperative complications with the strongest eLOS association may be beneficial for both the patient and the healthcare system as a whole.

Impact of preoperative echocardiography on surgical delays and outcomes among adults with hip fracture

AIMS

Echocardiography is commonly used in hip fracture patients to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk. However, echocardiography that delays surgical repair may be harmful. The objective of this study was to compare surgical wait times, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs for similar hip fracture patients evaluated with and without preoperative echocardiograms.

METHODS

A population-based, matched cohort study of all hip fracture patients (aged over 45 years) in Ontario, Canada between 2009 and 2014 was conducted. The primary exposure was preoperative echocardiography (occurring between hospital admission and surgery). Mortality rates, surgical wait times, postoperative LOS, and medical costs (expressed as 2013$ CAN) up to one year postoperatively were assessed after propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 2,354 of 42,230 (5.6%) eligible hip fracture patients received a preoperative echocardiogram during the study period. Echocardiography ordering practices varied among hospitals, ranging from 0% to 23.0% of hip fracture patients at different hospital sites. After successfully matching 2,298 (97.6%) patients, echocardiography was associated with significantly increased risks of mortality at 90 days (20.1% vs 16.8%; p = 0.004) and one year (32.9% vs 27.8%; p < 0.001), but not at 30 days (11.4% vs 9.8%; p = 0.084). Patients with echocardiography also had a mean increased delay from presentation to surgery (68.80 hours (SD 44.23) vs 39.69 hours (SD 27.09); p < 0.001), total LOS (19.49 days (SD 25.39) vs 15.94 days (SD 22.48); p < 0.001), and total healthcare costs at one year ($51,714.69 (SD 54,675.28) vs $41,861.47 (SD 50,854.12); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative echocardiography for hip fracture patients is associated with increased postoperative mortality at 90 days and one year but not at 30 days. Preoperative echocardiography is also associated with increased surgical delay, postoperative LOS, and total healthcare costs at one year. Echocardiography should be considered an urgent test when ordered to prevent additional surgical delay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):271-278.

Clinical utility of a focused hip MRI for assessing suspected hip fracture in the emergency department

PURPOSE

A focused hip MRI (FHMR) for the detection of radiographically occult hip fractures was implemented in our emergency department (ED) in 2013. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical utility of this protocol.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports of 262 unique patients who underwent 263 FHMR (coronal T1, coronal STIR, axial T2 fat saturated) for suspected hip fracture in the ED from October 2013 to March 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed for the ED course, follow-up imaging, and clinical management within 90 days.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients had one or more fractures identified by FHMR: one-third had proximal femoral fractures; two-third had pelvic fractures. Of these 71 patients, 53 (74%) had radiographically occult fractures, including 14 (20%) with occult proximal femoral fractures; 4 patients had fractures occult on CT. Nineteen patients with a suspected fracture on radiography were found to have no fracture on FHMR. Four fractures not reported on FHMR were later seen on follow-up imaging: these included 1 isolated greater trochanter, 1 additional ischial tuberosity, 1 additional superior pubic ramus, and 1 additional sacrum. All four fractures were treated non-operatively. Muscle/tendon injury was the most common type of injury, seen in 50% (130/262) patients with the most commonly torn tendons being the hamstring (44%; 15/34) followed by gluteus medius tendon (18%; 6/34). A full-hip or pelvis MRI was done after FHMR in only 5 patients, primarily for the purpose of better characterizing findings already identified on FHMR (2 for fracture, 2 for tendon injury, 1 for soft tissue metastasis). Only one of these five studies provided new information: ruling out a previously questioned fracture. Clinical management of the vast majority of patients was based solely on findings from the FHMR.

CONCLUSIONS

FHMR offers reliable identification of radiographically occult hip fractures and muscle/tendon injuries. The protocol is well trusted in guiding patient management in our ED.

Mortality Rate of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures Is High Compared With Hip Fractures. A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Compare acute complication and mortality rates of geriatric patients with acetabular fractures (AFs) matched to hip fractures (HFs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.

PATIENTS

Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project registry was used to identify all patients ≥60 years from 2011 to 2016 treated for AFs undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and HFs (undergoing ORIF, hemiarthroplasty, or cephalomedullary nail).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patient characteristics, comorbidities, functional status, acute complications, and mortality rates were recorded. Patients were matched 1:5 (AF:HF). Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare groups, and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the risk of complications or death while adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 303 AF patients (age: 78.2 ± 9.2 years/59.7% females/27.1% wall, 28.4% one column and 45.2% 2 columns ORIF) were matched to 1511 HF patients (age: 78.3 ± 9.1 years/60.2% females/37.2% hemiarthroplasty, 16.3% ORIF and 47.4% cephalomedullary nail). Length of stay (8.4 ± 7.1 vs. 6.4 ± 5.9 days) and time to surgery [(TS) 2.3 ± 1.8 versus 1.2 ± 1.4 days] were longer in the AF group (P < 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were nonsignificantly higher for AFs versus HFs (6.6% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.14). After covariable adjustment, the risk of mortality was significantly higher for AFs versus HFs (odds ratio: 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-3.35).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric AFs pose a significantly higher adjusted mortality risk when compared with HF patients. Strategies to mitigate risk factors in this population are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hip fracture clearance: How much optimisation is necessary?

Patients with hip fractures are typically elderly individuals with several co-morbidities. Upon admission to the hospital, they often present with acute pain, electrolyte disturbances, anaemia, coagulopathy, and delirium. Long waiting times for surgery are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The balance between the number of clinical tests and optimisation, which may (i.e., fewer complications and better survival) or may not (i.e., more complications and increased mortality due to unnecessary surgical delay) benefit the patient, has been a preoperative challenge. This summary will review existing clinical guidelines and relevant selected studies to evaluate the extent of preoperative optimisation needed prior to hip fracture surgery.

Academic Geriatric Orthopaedics: A New paradigm for Inpatient Care

Purpose of review

Healthcare systems are embarking on innovative, technologically savvy approaches to caring for our most rapidly growing population worldwide- the elderly. As healthcare systems respond, adapt and strategically plan for this rapidly growing population, it is paramount that we develop new paradigms of care for older patients. This review highlights some of the approaches academic medical centers are taking to improve the musculoskeletal and orthopaedic health of older adults.

Recent Findings

Academic health centers are posed to set and lead the standard of care for the next generation of orthopaedic care for older adults by leveraging innovative informatics platforms, quality improvement methodologies, game-changing research initiatives, education to the next generation of providers and helping change policies to help patients receive the best quality of life possible across the aging spectrum.

Summary

Academic geriatric orthopaedics can help society embrace a new paradigm in care for older adults by leveraging rapidly developing technologically and innovative approaches to care, advanced research, and education.