Performance of a Fracture Liaison Service in an Orthopaedic Setting: A Report of Key Indicators and Improvement of Longitudinal Outcomes

An insight for Fracture Liaison Service implementation: a qualitative study from a developing country

INTRODUCTION /OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis often goes undetected until the first fracture, significantly increasing the risk of subsequent fractures. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) model aims to prevent secondary fractures and improve osteoporosis management. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of FLS implementation in Iran, applying the essential elements outlined in the FLS framework.

METHOD

This qualitative study used framework analysis to explore key components of the FLS framework from the perspectives of Iranian experts. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted over a 3-month period. Collaborative scenario synthesis was employed to accurately reflect the complexities of FLS operations.

RESULTS

A total of 13 participants with an average practical experience of 3.2 years contributed to the study. The results covered the people involved, needed information, locations, timeframes, and operational details of FLS stages, as well as quality improvement. The study confirmed the FLS framework's applicability in describing an implemented FLS and highlighted areas for improvement, such as coordinator training, role clarification, and data management issues.

CONCLUSION

Given the scarcity of comprehensive studies on FLS within Iran's context and the recent growth and expansion of FLS initiatives in the country, this study offers insights into FLS implementation from the perspective of experts, serving as a guiding resource for future initiatives in this domain. Future research may benefit from developing tailored questionnaires based on the FLS framework to gather insights from a larger population for a better assessment. Key points • Iran lacks specialized training programs for FLS coordinators. Developing these programs is crucial, particularly for healthcare professionals from non-nursing specialties. • There is a lack of clarity regarding the timeline for each stage of the FLS process. A context-specific timeline is needed to optimize service implementation and workflow. • There are inaccuracies in coding patient information that pose significant challenges, potentially undermining hospital statistics and the quality of FLS data.

Team Approach: Organizing and Empowering Multidisciplinary Teams in Postfragility Fracture Care

» Numerous healthcare roles can be valuable and effective participants in postfracture care programs (PFCPs) and can also serve effectively as program liaisons/champions.» Greatest success seems to have been achieved when a single entity provides cohesive and consistent training, coordination, shared goals, and accountability for program sites and site leaders.» Few PFCPs have solved what seems to be the fundamental challenge of such programs: how to maintain program effectiveness and cohesion when the patient makes the inevitable transition from acute care to primary care? Creating a partnership with shared goals with primary care providers is a challenge for every program in every location.» Programs located in the United States, with its predominantly "open" healthcare system, seem to lag other parts of the world in overcoming this fundamental challenge.» It is hoped that all PFCPs in all systems can learn from the successes of other programs in managing this critical transition from acute to primary care.

Secondary fracture rates and risk factors 1 year after a proximal femoral fracture under FLS

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the secondary fracture rates and risk factors in patients with proximal femoral fractures using fracture liaison service (FLS) during the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multi-center prospective cohort study, patients with proximal femoral fractures who were treated surgically at three hospitals from April 2020 to March 2021 were included. Follow-up examinations at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were conducted to investigate the clinical data and ascertain whether osteoporosis treatment could be continued.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients with proximal femoral fractures were registered. During the follow-up period, 17 patients died and 67 patients could not visit the hospitals owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 172 patients who could be followed-up 12 months postoperatively were examined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during hospitalization; underwent postoperative osteoporosis treatment, mainly with bisphosphonates (89.5%); and were administered medications continuously. Secondary fractures occurred within 1 year in 14 patients (8.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who used sleeping pills and had a lower functional independence measure had an increased risk for developing secondary fractures.

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, secondary fractures can be prevented if the patients can be followed and osteoporosis treatment can be continued. Conversely, despite adequate osteoporosis drug examination and treatment, a certain number of secondary fractures still occurred. The finding that postoperative osteoporosis therapy using routine medications and rehabilitation is associated with secondary fractures may support the importance of establishing clinical standards consisting of a multidisciplinary collaboration for FLS.

Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends

Post-fracture care (PFC) programs evaluate and manage patients with a minimal trauma or fragility fracture to prevent subsequent fractures. We conducted a literature review to understand current trends in PFC publications, evaluate key characteristics of PFC programs, and assess their clinical effectiveness, geographic variations, and cost-effectiveness. We performed a search for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2003 and December 2020 listed in PubMed or Google Scholar. We categorized identified articles into 4 non-mutually exclusive PFC subtopics based on keywords and abstract content: PFC Types, PFC Effectiveness/Success, PFC Geography, and PFC Economics. The literature search identified 784 eligible articles. Most articles fit into multiple PFC subtopics (PFC Types, 597; PFC Effectiveness/Success, 579; PFC Geography, 255; and PFC Economics, 98). The number of publications describing how PFC programs can improve osteoporosis treatment rates has markedly increased since 2003; however, publication gaps remain, including low numbers of publications from some countries with reported high rates of osteoporosis and/or hip fractures. Fracture liaison services and geriatric/orthogeriatric services were the most common models of PFC programs, and both were shown to be cost-effective. We identified a need to expand and refine PFC programs and to standardize patient identification and reporting on quality improvement measures. Although there is an increasing awareness of the importance of PFC programs, publication gaps remain in most countries. Improvements in established PFC programs and implementation of new PFC programs are still needed to enhance equitable patient care to prevent occurrence of subsequent fractures.

Optimizing the Orthopaedic Consult

Providing orthopaedic call coverage is a core requirement for orthopaedic surgery residents. Developing proper call habits and routines during residency is critical to becoming an attending surgeon who provides high-quality call coverage and consultations without difficulty. Although patient acuity and call duration and frequency may vary among rotations and hospitals, the fundamentals remain the same. Because personal health and content knowledge are critical for success, physical and mental preparation is done in advance. Using a stepwise approach for answering calls, taking a history, performing a physical examination, interpreting studies, and performing procedures can improve the quality and efficiency of patient care. Standard practices can be used to improve the process of scheduling urgent and emergent surgery or establishing outpatient follow-up. When the complexity or volume of patient care exceeds one's capabilities, it is critical to know when and how to ask for help. Clear communication is essential for safe and effective transitions of care and when presenting patients to attending surgeons. A call shift can also serve as a learning experience by reading on topics as each consult is completed, teaching others, and following up on patient outcomes after the call shift.

Falling through the cracks: Evaluating the role of nonacute surgical liaison personnel during COVID-19-A narrative review

BACKGROUND

In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the New Zealand government instituted a 4-level alert system, which resulted in the rapid dissolution of nonurgent surgical services to minimize occupational exposure to both patients and staff, with the primary health sector bearing most of the diverted caseload. Consequently, the study authors sought to collate information around the establishment of a supportive nonacute surgical liaison role in a public hospital surgical department, with an interest in establishing this role in New Zealand.

METHODS

The narrative review conducted systematically in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases searched included Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. A deductive analysis was applied using a demand management model developed by the Institute for Innovation and Improvement at Waitematā District Health Board. All included studies were rated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence tool.

RESULTS

Collation of 19 studies resulted in 3 key findings: first, that a surgical liaison could be utilized at the primary care to specialist interface to improve communication and workflow between services. Second, a liaison could be utilized directly communicating with patients as a means of increasing engagement and self-management. Finally, this service can be offered through multiple modalities including a noncontact telehealth service.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of nonacute surgical liaisons both internationally and specifically within New Zealand has been collated to provide evidence for its application.

The first reported fracture liaison service (FLS) for vertebral fractures in China: is muscle the missing gap?

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been implemented worldwide, but we present one of the first reported experiences in China. Only 1 out of 226 patients had a secondary fracture within 1 year. This serves as a platform to improving solutions and decreasing imminent fractures for future use nationwide in China.

INTRODUCTION

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been implemented worldwide but we present one of the first reported experiences in China. Vertebral fragility fracture is one of the earliest fracture to occur. The objective of this study was to implement a dedicated fracture service to decrease imminent fractures for future use nationwide in China.

METHODS

Patients 50 years or older with a recent vertebral compression fracture were recruited. All patients were offered investigation with DXA scan and blood taking. Treatment was provided with calcium and vitamin D supplements and denosumab injections. The primary outcome was the imminent fracture rate or the re-fracture rate occurring within 2 years of the initial one. Secondary outcomes were bone mineral density (BMD), treatment initiation, adherence to drug, compliance to follow-up, falls, mortality, pain, quality of life, pain-related disability with Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-six patients (n = 226) were analyzed. 0.4% (n = 1) had an imminent fracture within 2 years. 11.1% (n = 25) had a fall within 2 years, in which 1 resulted in a major osteoporotic fracture. 7.1% died (n = 16) within the 2-year time period. 97.8% (n = 221) underwent BMD investigation with an initial DXA scan. One hundred percent (n = 226) had treatment initiation and were prescribed with Denosumab injections. 89.8% (n = 203) were compliant and showed complete adherence to drug therapy over the 2 years. Pain, quality of life, and disability were significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported fracture liaison service for vertebral fracture patients reported in China. Future FLS should incorporate muscle and sarcopenic assessments as a routine, and also research on novel interventions in this area would significantly improve patient outcomes.

Preventing hip fractures with multidisciplinary teams: a Canadian perspective

Fragility fractures (FFs) are low-energy trauma fractures that occur at or below standing height. Among FFs, hip fractures are associated with the greatest morbidity, mortality and cost to Canadian health care systems. This review highlights the current state of medical care for hip fractures in Canada, with specific focus on the role of the multidisciplinary team. Gaps in care exist, as FFs represent a unique challenge requiring both acute and chronic management. Furthermore, there is a lack of ownership of FFs by a medical specialty. These gaps can be addressed through the use of multidisciplinary teams, which have been shown to be efficacious and cost-effective. This model of care also addresses numerous patient-identified barriers to treatment, including inadequate patient counselling. However, there is still room for improvement in both the identification of patients at risk for hip fracture and patient adherence to therapy.

Osteoporosis: Recent Recommendations and Positions of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

➤

Osteoporosis is common in orthopaedic patients, not only in those sustaining fragility fractures but also in patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery.

➤

The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) has developed consensus-based recommendations for secondary fracture prevention for all patients who are ≥65 years old with a hip or spine fracture.

➤

The ASBMR encourages orthopaedic surgeons to "Own the Bone," by beginning prevention of a secondary fracture during hospitalization for a fragility fracture, if practicable, and arranging follow-up for continued bone health care after discharge.

➤

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recognized that many poor outcomes and complications of elective orthopaedic surgery are related to osteoporosis.

➤

The ISCD used an evidence-based approach to create official positions to identify which patients ≥50 years old who are having elective orthopaedic surgery should undergo assessment of bone health and how this should be performed.

Patient Healthcare Trajectory and its Impact on the Cost-Effectiveness of Fracture Liaison Services

This study aimed to assess the cost-utility of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) with a systematic follow-up according to patients' follow-up compliance trajectories. The Lucky Bone™ FLS is a prospective cohort study conducted on women and men (≥40 years) with fragility fractures. Dedicated personnel of the program identified fractures, investigated, treated, and followed patients systematically over 2 years. Groups of follow-up compliance trajectories were identified, and Markov decision models were used to assess the cost-utility of each follow-up trajectory group compared to usual care. A lifetime horizon from the perspective of the healthcare payer was modeled. Costs were converted to 2018 Canadian dollars and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were measured. Costs and benefits were discounted at 1.5%. A total of 532 participants were followed in the FLS (86% women, mean age of 63 years). Three trajectories were predicted and interpreted; the high followers (HFs, 48.4%), intermediate followers (IFs, 28.1%), and low followers (LFs, 23.5%). The costs of the interventions per patient varied between $300 and $446 for 2 years, according to the follow-up trajectory. The FLS had higher investigation, treatment, and persistence rates compared to usual care. Compared to usual care, the ICURs for the HF, IF, and LF trajectory groups were $4250, $21,900, and $72,800 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, respectively ($9000 per QALY gained for the overall FLS). Sensitivity analyses showed that the HF and IF trajectory groups, as well as the entire FLS, were cost-effective in >67% of simulations with respect to usual care. In summary, these results suggest that a high-intensity FLS with a systematic 2-year follow-up can be cost-effective, especially when patients attend follow-up visits. They also highlight the importance of understanding the behaviors and factors that surround follow-up compliance over time as secondary prevention means that they are at high risk of re-fracture. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Comparison of morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures: Which one has the highest burden?

Objectives

Hip fragility fractures were regarded as one of the most severe, but recent papers report on the underestimated burden of vertebral compression fractures. This study aims to compare morbidity and mortality of hip and vertebral fragility fractures in patients treated in the same setting.

Methods

Patients aged ≥50 years with hip fracture, and those with vertebral fracture presenting to our hospital between January 2014 and January 2017 were included. Patients were evaluated 1 year after their index fracture. SF-36 scores, mortality, and institutionalization are then recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups: hip fractures and vertebral fractures.

Results

There were 106 and 90 patients respectively evaluated in hip and vertebral fracture groups at 1 year. Patients in both groups were comparable for age, sex, comorbidities and neuropsychiatric condition (P > 0.05). At 1 year follow-up, SF-36 showed better averages in all 8 scales in hip fracture group compared to vertebral fracture group. Mortality in the hip fracture group reached 32.1% compared to 10% for the vertebral fracture group (P < 0.01). Fifteen patients were institutionalized in the hip fracture group compared to 18 patients in the vertebral fracture group (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

When comparing patients treated in the same setting, hip fracture is associated with significantly increased mortality than vertebral fracture; however, the latter is associated with more morbidity.