Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment

Quadrilateral plate classification program of acetabular fractures based on three-column classification: a three-dimensional fracture mapping study

BACKGROUND

A new classification system for acetabular fractures has been proposed in recent years, which is called the 3-column classification. However, this system does not provide information regarding quadrilateral plate fractures. To address this issue, we utilized three-dimensional (3D) fracture line mapping and heat map to analyze the link between the 3-column classification and quadrilateral plate fractures.

METHODS

We collected CT scan data from 177 patients who had been diagnosed with acetabular fractures. Additionally, we utilized a CT scan of a healthy adult to generate a standard acetabular model. We utilized the collected CT data of the fracture to create a 3D model and subsequently reduced it. We then matched each acetabular fracture model with the standard acetabular model and mapped all of the fracture lines to the standard model. 3D fracture lines and heat maps were created by overlapping all fracture lines. Fracture characteristics were then summarized using these maps.

RESULTS

This study analyzed a total of 221 acetabular fractures. The most frequently observed fracture type, based on the three-column classification, was A1.2, which corresponds to fractures of the anterior column. In contrast, the least common type of fracture was A4, which represents fractures of the central wall. It was noted that quadrilateral plate fractures were frequently observed in fractures classified as type B and C according to the three-column classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the three-column classification, the QLP fractures are commonly observed in type B and C. It is important to carefully identify these fractures during the diagnostic process. Therefore, based on the three-column classification, we have amalgamated quadrilateral plate fractures and formulated a classification program for acetabular fractures.

Introduction and An Analysis of Inter- and Intra-observer Validity to the Classification of Hoffa-Like Tibial Plateau Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The posterior coronal shearing fractures of the tibial plateau are rare and can be easily missed or ignored. Our team defined these fractures as Hoffa-like fracture of the tibial plateau and conducted a series of studies. The aim of this study is to introduce the characteristics of the Hoffa-like fracture of the tibial plateau, propose a new classification system and evaluate its validity.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau were treated in five trauma centers (I-III) from 2017 to 2020. A new classification system was developed based on the morphological fracture patterns in CT and radiographic of the first 30 cases. Ten cases of suspected tibial plateau Hoffa-like fractures were supplemented additionally to the 61 cases to increase the accuracy. CT and radiographic images of the 71 cases were reviewed independently by four reviewers on two separate occasions and classified according to the new classification system. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was used to analyze the reliability on separate observers at the same time and to analyze the classification made by same observer at different times (intra-observer), which measures inter-observer and intra-observer agreements.

RESULTS

Out of the 61 patients, 46 (75.4%) isolated coronal fractures involving the medial condyle of tibial plateaus and 53 (86.9%) combined with intercondylar spine fractures. The κ-values were calculated for the new classification system (mean κ = 0.74 inter-observer, mean κ = 0.79 intra-observer, indicating substantial agreement).

CONCLUSION

The novel classification lends insight into fracture morphology of the tibial plateau Hoffa-like fractures, has good inter- and intra-observer validity, and it aids in treatment.

Isolated quadrilateral plate fracture with central hip dislocation after epileptic seizure in a postpartum patient: A case report

Isolated quadrilateral plate fractures are extremely rare and their treatment is complex. The postpartum period and recent caesarean section additionally increase already significant risks of surgical treatment. Modified Stoppa approach and the use of infrapectineal plate represent the optimal surgical treatment method. One case of central hip dislocation and isolated quadrilateral plate fracture was reported during an epileptic seizure 1 day postpartum, which was treated with open reduction and internal fixation. A 25-year-old female patient had given birth via cesarean section. One day postpartum, she had multiple generalized tonic clonic seizures. Arteriovenous malformation was identified as the cause of seizures by MRI. The patient complained of left hip pain and inability to move the left leg which prompted clinical and radiological examination. A pelvic CT scan verified multifragmentary fracture of the quadrilateral plate without fracture of the acetabular columns. The central hip dislocation was verified. Due to the rarity of the fracture, the clinical decision-making process was difficult. The patient, being in the postpartum period, was also at a greater risk of infection. The patient was treated surgically, and osteosynthesis was performed with an infrapectineal plate for the acetabulum using the modified Stoppa approach. The initial incision was done through the same Pfannenstiel incision from caesarean section. The patient's postoperative recovery was good at 1 year follow-up.

Acetabular fracture pattern is altered by pre-injury sacroiliac joint autofusion

PURPOSE

Acetabular fracture shape is determined by the direction of force applied. We perceive an anecdotally observed connection between pre-existing autofused sacroiliac joints (aSIJ) and high anterior column (HAC) injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare variations in acetabular fracture patterns sustained in patients with and without pre-injury sacroiliac (SI) joint autofusion.

METHODS

All adult patients receiving unilateral acetabular fixation (level 1 academic trauma; 2008-2018) were reviewed. Injury radiographs and CT scans were reviewed for fracture patterns and pre-existing aSIJ. Fracture types were subgrouped presence of HAC injury (includes anterior column (AC), anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT), or associated both column (ABC)).

ANALYSIS

Logistic regression determined the association between aSIJ and HAC.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients received unilateral acetabular fixation (2008-2018); 61 (16%) demonstrated CT evidence of idiopathic aSIJ. These patients were older (64.1 vs. 47.4, p < 0.01), more likely to be male (95% vs. 71%, p < 0.01), less likely to be smokers (19.0% vs. 44.8%, p < 0.01), and were injured from lower energy mechanisms (21.3% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.01). The most common patterns with autofusion were ACPHT (n = 13, 21%) and ABC (n = 25, 41%). Autofusion was associated with greater odds of patterns involving a high anterior column injury (ABC, ACPHT, or isolated anterior column; OR = 4.97, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, mechanism, and body mass index, the connection between autofusion and high anterior column injuries remained significant (OR = 2.60, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SI joint autofusion appears to change mode of failure in acetabular injuries; a more rigid posterior ring may precipitate a high anterior column injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level III.

A new classification for quadrilateral plate fracture of acetabulum

BACKGROUND

Recently, quadrilateral plate (QLP) fractures of acetabulum have attracted increasing attention. However, evidence for the appropriate classification of QLP fractures is still lacking, making it difficult to understand and manage these fractures. This study aimed to introduce a new classification for QLP fractures and evaluate its reproducibility.

METHODS

A series of 1101 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures from 8 level-I trauma centers were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent preoperative radiograph and computed tomography imaging. QLP fractures were identified and classified using the new and Judet-Letournel classification system. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities (kappa coefficients, κ) of these two systems were investigated by 4 observers. Furthermore, surgical approaches and fixation methods for each fracture type are described.

RESULTS

In total, 243 (243/1101, 22%) patients with QLP fractures were identified and included in this analysis. The mean κ value of the intra-observer reliability was 0.84 (range, 0.763-0.919) for the new classification, indicating excellent agreement, and the inter-observer reliability was 0.762 (range, 0.625-0.876), indicating substantial agreement. The values were 0.649 (range, 0.523-0.708) and 0.584 (0.497-0.646), respectively, according to the Judet-Letournel classification. Six cases (6/243, 2.5%) could not be classified using the Judet-Letournel classification. The selection of surgical approaches and fixation methods depends on the fracture type; however, an anterior intra-pelvic approach and buttressing fixation using the plate or screw are preferred for QLP fractures.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a new classification for QLP fractures, showing higher intra- and inter-observer reliabilities than those obtained using the Judet-Letournel classification. This allowed us to obtain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of QLP fractures. Additionally, the new classification might guide further studies on surgical strategies for QLP fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Drain vs. no-drain for acetabular fractures after treatment via a modified stoppa approach: A retrospective study

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of close suction drainage (CSD) and no-CSD after a modified Stoppa approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.

Methods

This retrospective study included 49 consecutive acetabular fracture patients, who presented to a single level I trauma center for surgical fixation, using a modified Stoppa approach from January 2018 to January 2021. All surgeries were performed by a senior surgeon using the same approach, and the patients were divided into two groups based on whether CSD was used after the operation. Details of the patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, intra and postoperative blood transfusion, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications were collected.

Results

No significant differences were found in the demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). The use of CSD was associated with a significantly higher postoperative blood transfusion volume (P = 0.034) and postoperative blood transfusion rate (P = 0.027). In addition, there was a significant difference in postoperative temperatures, especially on postoperative Day 2 (no-CSD 36.97 ± 0.51°C vs. CSD 37.34 ± 0.69°C, P = 0.035), and higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, especially on postoperative Day 1 (no-CSD 3.00 ± 0.93 vs. CSD 4.14 ± 1.43, P = 0.002) and 3 (no-CSD 1.73 ± 0.94 vs. CSD 2.48 ± 1.08, P = 0.013).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that routine use of CSD should not be recommended for patients with acetabular fractures after surgical fixation using a modified Stoppa approach.

Morphological Characteristics of Proximal Ulna Fractures: A Proposal for a New Classification and Agreement for Validation

Historically, proximal ulna fractures have been simplistically diagnosed and treated as simple olecranon fractures, leading to an unacceptable number of complications. Our hypothesis was that the recognition of lateral, intermediate, and medial stabilizers of the proximal ulna and ulnohumeral and proximal radioulnar joints would facilitate decision-making, including the choice of approach and type of fixation. The primary aim was to propose a new classification for complex fractures of the proximal ulna based on morphological characteristics seen on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). The secondary aim was to validate the proposed classification regarding its intra- and inter-rater agreement. Three raters with different levels of experience analyzed 39 cases of complex fractures of the proximal ulna using radiographs and 3D CT scans. We presented the proposed classification (divided into four types with subtypes) to the raters. In this classification, the medial column of the ulna involves the sublime tubercle and is where the anterior medial collateral ligament is inserted, the lateral column contains the supinator crest and is where the lateral ulnar collateral ligament is inserted, and the intermediate column involves the coronoid process of the ulna, olecranon, and anterior capsule of the elbow. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was analyzed for two different rounds, and the results were evaluated according to Fleiss kappa, Cohen kappa, and Kendall coefficient. Intra- and inter-rater agreement values were very good (0.82 and 0.77, respectively). Good intra- and inter-rater agreement attested to the stability of the proposed classification among the raters, regardless of the level of experience of each one. The new classification proved to be easy to understand and had very good intra- and inter-rater agreement, regardless of the level of experience of each rater.

New Classification Based on CT and Its Value Evaluation for Fractures of the Lateral Process of the Talus

This study aimed to develop a comprehensive classification system for fractures of the lateral process of the talus (LPTF) based on CT, and to evaluate its prognostic value, reliability and reproducibility. We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients involving LPTF with an average follow-up of 35.9 months for clinical and radiographic evaluations. In order to develop a comprehensive classification, a panel of experienced orthopedic surgeons discussed the cases. All fractures were classified according to Hawkins, McCrory-Bladin and new proposed classifications by 6 observers. The analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreements was measured using kappa statistics. The new classification included 2 types based on presence of concomitant injuries or not, with type I consisting of 3 subtypes and type II of 5 subtypes. Average AOFAS score was 91.5 in the type Ia of new classification, 86 in type Ib, 90.5 in type Ic, 89 in type IIa, 76.7 in type IIb, 76.6 in type IIc, 91.3 in type IId, and 83.5 in type IIe. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the new classification system were almost perfect (κ = 0.776 and 0.837, respectively), showing a higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability compared to the Hawkins classification (κ 0.572 and 0.649, respectively) as well as McCrory-Bladin classification (κ = 0.582 and 0.685, respectively). The new classification system is a comprehensive one that takes into account concomitant injuries and shows good prognostic value with clinical outcomes. It is more reliable and reproducible and could be a useful tool for decision-making on treatment options for LPTF.

Development and validation of a deep learning-based model to distinguish acetabular fractures on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs

Objective: To develop and test a deep learning (DL) model to distinguish acetabular fractures (AFs) on pelvic anteroposterior radiographs (PARs) and compare its performance to that of clinicians. Materials and methods: A total of 1,120 patients from a big level-I trauma center were enrolled and allocated at a 3:1 ratio for the DL model's development and internal test. Another 86 patients from two independent hospitals were collected for external validation. A DL model for identifying AFs was constructed based on DenseNet. AFs were classified into types A, B, and C according to the three-column classification theory. Ten clinicians were recruited for AF detection. A potential misdiagnosed case (PMC) was defined based on clinicians' detection results. The detection performance of the clinicians and DL model were evaluated and compared. The detection performance of different subtypes using DL was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The means of 10 clinicians' sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to identify AFs were 0.750/0.735, 0.909/0.909, and 0.829/0.822, in the internal test/external validation set, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the DL detection model were 0.926/0.872, 0.978/0.988, and 0.952/0.930, respectively. The DL model identified type A fractures with an AUC of 0.963 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.927-0.985]/0.950 (95% CI: 0.867-0.989); type B fractures with an AUC of 0.991 (95% CI: 0.967-0.999)/0.989 (95% CI: 0.930-1.000); and type C fractures with an AUC of 1.000 (95% CI: 0.975-1.000)/1.000 (95% CI: 0.897-1.000) in the test/validation set. The DL model correctly recognized 56.5% (26/46) of PMCs. Conclusion: A DL model for distinguishing AFs on PARs is feasible. In this study, the DL model achieved a diagnostic performance comparable to or even superior to that of clinicians.

CT-Based Classification Systems for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: The Inter- and Intraobserver Variations as well as Integrality

The aim of this study was to measure the inter- and intraobserver variations as well as integrality of the Zwipp, Crosby-Fitzgibbons, Sanders, and Eastwood-Atkins classification systems based on more accurate CT scans. Five hundred and forty-nine patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures from January 2018 to December 2019 taken from a database in our level-I trauma center (3 affiliated hospitals) were included. For each case, normative CT (1 mm slices) scans were available. Four different observers reviewed all CT scans 2 times according to these 4 most prevalent fracture classification systems (FCSs) within a 2-month interval. For these 4 FCSs, the kappa [κ] coefficient was used to evaluate interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility, and the percentage that can be classified was used to indicate integrality. The κ values were measured for Zwipp (κ = 0.38 interobserver, κ = 0.61 intraobserver), Crosby-Fitzgibbons (κ = 0.48 interobserver, κ = 0.79 intraobserver), Sanders (κ = 0.40 interobserver, κ = 0.57 intraobserver), and Eastwood-Atkins (κ = 0.44 interobserver, κ = 0.72 intraobserver). Furthermore, the integralities were calculated for Zwipp (100%), Crosby-Fitzgibbons (100%), Sanders (92%) as well as Eastwood-Atkins (89.6%). Compared with previous literatures, CT scanning with higher accuracy can significantly improve intraobserver reproducibility of Zwipp and Eastwood-Atkins FCSs, but it has no positive effect on variability of Sanders FCS and interobserver reliability of Crosby-Fitzgibbons FCS. In terms of integrality, Zwipp and Crosby-Fitzgibbons FCSs appear to be superior to the other 2 FCSs.

Validation of the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register

OBJECTIVES

To validate the classification of surgically treated acetabular fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) and to investigate the intra- and interrater reliability of the Judet-Letournel / AO/OTA classification systems.

METHODS

Surgically treated acetabular fractures were randomly selected from the SFR (n = 132) and 124 fractures were classified independently by three experienced orthopedic pelvic surgeons at two different occasions. A gold standard classification was established for each case after these two sessions or, if necessary, after a discussion session. The gold standard classification was compared to the registered SFR classification to assess the validity of SFR data. Accuracy and intra- and interrater agreement were evaluated using Cohen´s kappa with interpretation according to Landis and Koch.

RESULTS

There was moderate agreement between the established gold standard classification and the SFR (kappa 0.43). The level of agreement differed between classification groups. The intrarater agreement was substantial to almost perfect and interrater agreement was moderate to substantial.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of acetabular fracture classifications in the SFR was moderate and comparable to previous validation studies from the SFR on other fracture types. As the accuracy differed between fracture groups, care should be taken when analyzing data from the SFR on specific acetabular fracture groups.

Three-dimensional mapping study of pure transverse acetabular fractures

BACKGROUND

To describe and analyze the morphological characteristics, location and frequency of pure transverse acetabular fracture lines through fracture mapping and quantitative measurements.

METHODS

Transverse fractures were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All computed tomography (CT) data were used for reconstruction and manual reduction. The reductive fracture fragments were graphically overlaid onto a three-dimensional (3D) right hemipelvis template. Then, the fracture lines were accurately depicted onto the surface of the 3D template. The fracture lines were overlapped onto the model to create the 3D fracture map and heatmap. All cases were subdivided into infratectal (62-B1.1), juxtatectal (62-B1.2), and transtectal (62-B1.3) types based on the AO Foundation/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification. Some anatomic parameters of the transverse fractures were also analyzed in these 3 groups.

RESULTS

Our study included forty-nine transverse fractures from 32 male and 17 female patients (mean age, 42 years; range 21-74 years) and included 19 type 62-B1.1, 17 type 62-B1.2, and 13 type 62-B1.3 fractures. The average anterior rim fracture angle was 70.0° (± 11.6°), and the posterior rim fracture angle was 92.4° (± 28.5°). The anterior rim fracture angles in 40 cases (40/49, 81.6%) fell within a wide range between 63° and 80°. On the heatmap, the hot zones were located on the highest position of the cotyloid fossa and the narrowed region, and the cold zone was on the inferior third of the articular surface. For type 62-B1.3 fractures, the hot zone was located on the posterior of the acetabular dome. There were no significant differences in anterior rim fracture angle and anterior height among the three patterns (P = 0.071, P = 0.072). Post hoc tests of the posterior rim fracture angle and the posterior height revealed significant differences among fracture subtypes (P < 0.01). The posterior intra-articular fracture line was significantly longer than the anterior intra-articular fracture line in type 62-B1.1 and type 62-B1.2 fractures (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The fracture lines of transverse fractures through the anterior rim were concentrated on the narrowed zone, and the posterior fracture lines were diffusely distributed. The intra-articular fracture line distribution was focused on the superior and middle thirds of the joint surface. The recurrent fracture lines involving the weight-bearing dome mainly converged on the posterior region of the roof.

Fracture Mapping of Both-Column Acetabular Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the location and frequency of the fracture lines and comminution zones of both-column fractures using fracture mapping.

METHODS

Both-column fractures were retrospectively reviewed in 4 Level 1 trauma centers. Mimics software was used to reconstruct the both-column fractures and simulate the fracture reduction. Then, the fracture lines and the intra-articular and extra-articular comminution zones were drawn on a 3-dimensional innominate bone template. The distribution of fracture lines and fracture fragments were also mapped on the two-dimensional template of the acetabulum. All the included patients were divided into low-variety group and high-variety group according to the anterior column fracture line above or below the anterior superior spine. The anatomical characteristics of the posterior wall fragment were also analyzed in these 2 groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with both-column fracture were included. The T type or inverted Y type main fracture lines divided the innominate bone into low-variety (n = 11) and high-variety (n = 67) both-column fractures. The extra-articular comminution zones are usually distributed between the posterior iliac fragment and anterior column fragment. High-variety type both-column fractures are usually combined with high and sharp posterior wall fragments, whereas low-variety type both-column fractures are usually accompanied by low and flat posterior wall fragments. The comminution zones in the acetabulum are mostly concentrated in the anterior and inferior parts of the acetabulum.

CONCLUSIONS

The innominate bone is divided into 3 major parts in the both-column fracture, and the fracture center is located at the proximal of the acetabular dome. The both-column fractures are divided into low-variety and high-variety patterns. The location of the anterior column fracture determined the characteristics of the posterior wall fragment.

Morphological Characteristics of the Posterior Wall Associated with Complex Acetabular Fractures: A Radiological Study Using 3D Software and Fracture Mapping Technique

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the morphological distinctions of the posterior wall (PW) in different complex acetabular fractures using 3D software and fracture mapping technique and ultimately to provide for improved clinical treatment.

Methods

One hundred and fourteen patients with complex acetabular fracture associated with PW were recruited. All patients were divided into two groups according to the injury mechanism of the PW: Group A (both-column and PW) and Group B (including posterior column and PW; T shape and PW; and transverse and PW). Fracture mapping was generated on the intra- and extrasurface of a standard template. The radiological parameters including spatial displacement, articular surface area, articular range, marginal impaction, and multifragments of the two groups were compared.

Results

The spatial displacement, intra-/extra-articular surface area, and start and end point in Group A were 10.9 mm (IQR, 8.4-15.2), 8.2 ± 2.6 cm², 17.9 ± 5.3 cm², 0.8° (IQR, -6.0-16.2), and 107.5° (IQR, 97.2-116.9), respectively. The results in Group B were 30.4 mm (IQR, 16.8-48.7), 4.1 ± 2.0 cm², 10.6 ± 4.4 cm², 29.5° (IQR, 19.2-38.0), and 117.5° (IQR, 98.2-127.2), respectively. Marginal impaction was defined by Letournel et al. All the differences between two groups were significant (P < 0.05). The fracture map in Group A showed an “L”-shaped pattern and a “cusp” on the ilium, and the PW was located at 1/5 to 1/4 of the posterosuperior part of the acetabulum. The fracture maps in Group B were scattered and lacked consistency, and the PWs were confined to 1/10 to 1/8 of the posterior acetabulum.

Conclusions

Quantitative measurements and fracture mapping represented the differences in morphological characteristics of PWs associated with complex acetabular fractures.

Differences in fixation to young and elderly quadrilateral surfaces with anatomic quadrilateral surface plate (AQSP) based on cortical thickness morphological results

Aims

With relatively thinner cortical thickness, the management of acetabulum osteoporotic fractures in elderly patients is difficult. The aim of the research was to compare and present the morphological characteristics of the quadrilateral plate in young and elderly age groups, such as the area, and position distribution of the thin cortical thickness region, fracture lines maps, and propose a revised design plate for elderly patients based on these anatomic information.

Methods

As a retrospective research, acetabular fracture with one normal hemipelvises, including 110 men and 39 women, were collected to present the morphological characteristics of the quadrilateral region. The subjects were divided into three different age groups: Group I = 18–40 years (31.3 ± 6.6 years), Group II = 41–60 years (49.9 ± 5.3 years), and Group III ≥ 61 years (68.7 ± 6.8 years). The area of the quadrilateral surface, the area and position distribution of the thin cortical thickness region, the ratio and fracture lines maps were calculated and compared with Mimics in different groups.

Results

The thin cortical thickness/width region area (TCWRA) was significantly increased in Group III compared with Group I and Group II. The ratio of TCWRA accounted for in the quadrilateral region was also significantly increased in Group III (≥ 61 years) compared with Group I (P = 0.01) and Group II (P = 0.011). None of the subjects had a component involving the “A” zone, thirty-three thin cortical thickness regions were located in the “B” zone, and one hundred and sixteen involved both zones of the quadrilateral plate (“A + B” zone). Furthermore, there were a significant differences in the fracture line distributions in three age groups. More fracture lines of elderly patients were located at anterior part (B zone) compared with Group I and Group II.

Conclusions

It was identified the area of thin cortical thickness region increased as age grown, and fracture lines were inclined to be more distributed in “B” zone in elderly patients. To meet the demands of acetabular fixation in different age groups, cortical thickness changes in young and elderly individuals should be given special attention when the quadrilateral surface plate is designed.

Level of evidence Level IV, observational study.

Is Plating Fixation Through the Kocher–Langenbeck Approach for Associated Posterior Wall Fragment Indispensable in Both‐Column Acetabular Fractures?

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Is "Transcolumnar" a better Terminology than "Transverse" in Judet-Letournel Classification of Acetabular Fractures?

Acetabular fractures are among the most complex and challenging injuries for orthopaedic surgeons. The choice of surgical treatment in acetabular fracture is important for optimal outcomes. It requires an understanding of the precise outline of the fracture by appropriate classification because it is important for decision making. For this purpose, the classification proposed by Judet and Letournel in 1963 remains the gold standard despite its shortcoming, which are attributed to the inclusion of multiple criteria including anatomical, directional and geometrical. This complex classification remains challenging especially to lesser experienced surgeons. In this article, a new method for classification of acetabulum fractures is proposed. It places posterior column with posterior wall fractures to simple fractures instead of complex fractures in Judet and Letournel classification. More importantly the proposed new classification renames “transverse fracture” as “transcolumnar fracture” to better represent anatomical structure rather than morphology. It is expected that by coining the new term “transcolumnar ”it will be easy to understand different types of acetabular fractures. Especially the confusion between “transverse” and “both column fractures” would not be a concern in future.

Exposure Provided by the Gibson Versus the Kocher-Langenbeck Approaches With and Without Trochanteric Osteotomy: A Cadaveric Mapping Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prevalent approaches in acetabular fracture surgery provide enhanced anterior and cranial exposure in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

A Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach (followed by a Gibson approach on the contralateral hip) was performed in the lateral position on 8 cadavers. A Steinmann pin was used to create holes outlining the bony surfaces available for instrumentation before and after a trochanteric osteotomy. All soft tissue was then removed from the pelvis, and a calibrated digital picture was taken. The surface area of the pelvis visualized through each approach was calculated and compared with the contralateral side to assess for a difference in exposure between the Gibson approach and the K-L approach. An increase in exposure of greater than 10% was considered significant. The extent of anterior exposure (with and without a trochanteric osteotomy) was then measured from the greater sciatic notch.

RESULTS

In 2 of 8 cadavers (25%), the Gibson approach yielded an increase in exposure when compared with a K-L approach. The addition of a trochanteric osteotomy yielded on average 1.6 cm (range, 0.7-2.6 cm) of increased anterior exposure in the K-L approaches and 1.5 cm (range 0.9-3.1 cm) in the Gibson approaches.

CONCLUSION

The Gibson approach did not reliably provide increased anterior exposure compared with a K-L approach in a cadaver model. A trochanteric osteotomy can be expected to add 1-2 cm of increased anterior exposure in both approaches.

Three-dimensional printing combined with open reduction and internal fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcome of three-dimensional (3D) printing combined with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to traditional ORIF in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, VIP database, CNKI, and Wanfang database with keywords "acetabular fracture", "3D printing", "three-dimensional printing", "open reduction and internal fixation", "Acetabulum", "Acetabula" from January 2000 to March 2020. Two reviewers independently selected articles, extracted data, assessed the quality evidence and risk bias of included trials using the Cochrane Collaboration' s tools and/or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. When the two analysts had different opinions, they would ask the third analyst for opinion. Randomized controlled trials or retrospective comparative studies of 3D printing combined with ORIF (3D printing group) versus traditional ORIF (conventional group) in the treatment of acetabular fractures were selected. The data of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, incidence of complications, excellent and good rate of Matta score for reduction, and excellent and good rate of hip function score were extracted. Stata14.0 statistical software was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Altogether 9 articles were selected, including 5 randomized controlled trials and 4 retrospective studies. A total of 467 patients were analyzed, 250 in the conventional group, and 217 in the 3D printing group. The operation time in the 3D printing group was less than that in the conventional group and the difference was statistically significant (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.19, 95% CI: -1.55 to -0.82, p < 0.05). The intraoperative bleeding volume of the 3D printing group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI: -1.65 to -0.51, p < 0.05). The fluoroscopy times were less in the 3D printing group than in the conventional group and the difference was statistically significant (SMD = -1.64, 95% CI: -2.35 to -0.93, p < 0.05). The total incidence of complications in the 3D printing group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.79, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of Matta score for reduction between the two groups (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.34-1.06, p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of hip function score at the end of postoperative follow-up between the two groups (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.46-1.56, p > 0.05), but the follow-up time varies from 6 months to 40 months.

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional ORIF, 3D printing combined with ORIF has certain advantages in terms that 3D printing not only helps surgeons to understand acetabular fractures more intuitively, but also effectively reduces operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative complications. However, there were no significant differences in the excellent and good rate of Matta score for reduction and the excellent and good rate of hip function score at the end of follow-up.

Comparative study of anatomical locking plate and reconstruction plate in treating acetabular fractures

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of anatomic locking plate and reconstruction plate used in treating acetabular fractures.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2016, patients with acetabular fractures were included in this retrospective study. We grouped the patients into two groups based on the internal fixation: reconstruction plate group (RPG) and anatomic locking plate group (ALPG). The operation time, blood loss, intra-operative screw penetration, and plate breakage were compared between the two groups. The intra-operative fluoroscopic images were used to evaluate the fixation location. The quality of reduction and radiological grading were assessed according to the criteria developed by Matta. The clinical assessment was based on the Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included in this study and were followed up for an average of 35 months (range, 25 to 42 months). Thirty-five patients were treated with the anatomical locking plate, and 48 patients were treated with the reconstruction plate. The mean surgical time was significantly shorter (P < 0.0001) in ALPG patients than in RPG patients, and the intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower (P = 0.008). The rates of intra-operative screw penetration or plate breakage in the ALPG (0/35) are significantly lower than that in the RPG (7/48) (P = 0.018). Post-operative Matta score (P = 0.905), Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score (P = 0.957), and overall complication rates (P = 0.391) were not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated by anatomical locking plate had shorter operation time, less bleeding, and lower rate screw perforation compared to patients treated by reconstruction plate. Anatomical locking plate is a better choice for acetabulum fractures, especially complicated fractures.

What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Gap and stepoff values in the treatment of acetabular fractures are correlated with clinical outcomes. However, the interobserver and intraobserver variability of gap and stepoff measurements for all imaging modalities in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phase of treatment is unknown. Recently, a standardized CT-based measurement method was introduced, which provided the opportunity to assess the level of variability.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In patients with acetabular fractures, what is the interobserver variability in the measurement of the fracture gaps and articular stepoffs determined by each observer to be the maximum one in the weightbearing dome, as measured on pre- and postoperative pelvic radiographs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and pre- and postoperative CT scans? (2) What is the intraobserver variability in these measurements?

METHODS

Sixty patients with a complete subset of pre-, intra- and postoperative high-quality images (CT slices of < 2 mm), representing a variety of fracture types with small and large gaps and/or stepoffs, were included. A total of 196 patients with nonoperative treatment (n = 117), inadequate available imaging (n = 60), skeletal immaturity (n = 16), bilateral fractures (n = 2) or a primary THA (n = 1) were excluded. The maximum gap and stepoff values in the weightbearing dome were digitally measured on pelvic radiographs and CT images by five independent observers. Observers were free to decide which gap and/or stepoff they considered the maximum and then measure these before and after surgery. The observers were two trauma surgeons with more than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, two trauma surgeons with less than 5 years of experience in pelvic surgery, and one surgical resident. Additionally, the final intraoperative fluoroscopy images were assessed for the presence of a gap or stepoff in the weightbearing dome. All observers used the same standardized measurement technique and each observer measured the first five patients together with the responsible researcher. For 10 randomly selected patients, all measurements were repeated by all observers, at least 2 weeks after the initial measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for pelvic radiographs and CT images and the kappa value for intraoperative fluoroscopy measurements were calculated to determine the inter- and intraobserver variability. Interobserver variability was defined as the difference in the measurements between observers. Intraobserver variability was defined as the difference in repeated measurements by the same observer.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap and stepoff) on radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff) on CT images. The observers agreed on the indication for surgery in 40% (gap) and 30% (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. For CT scans the observers agreed in 95% (gap) and 70% (stepoff) of images. Postoperatively, the interobserver ICC was 0.4 (gap) and 0.2 (stepoff) on radiographs. The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable or not in 60% (gap) and 40% (stepoff). On CT images the ICC was 0.3 (gap) and 0.4 (stepoff). The observers agreed on whether the reduction was acceptable in 35% (gap) and 38% (stepoff). The preoperative intraobserver ICC was 0.6 (gap and stepoff) on pelvic radiographs and 0.4 (gap) and 0.6 (stepoff) for CT scans. Postoperatively, the intraobserver ICC was 0.7 (gap) and 0.1 (stepoff) on pelvic radiographs. On CT the intraobserver ICC was 0.5 (gap) and 0.3 (stepoff). There was no agreement between the observers on the presence of a gap or stepoff on intraoperative fluoroscopy images (kappa -0.1 to 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an insufficient interobserver and intraobserver agreement on measuring gaps and stepoffs for supporting clinical decisions in acetabular fracture surgery. If observers cannot agree on the size of the gap and stepoff, it will be challenging to decide when to perform surgery and study the results of acetabular fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

[Mechanism and surgical treatment of acetabular roof column fractures with external iliac arterial injury: analysis of 4 cases]

Pelvic arterial injuries caused by pelvic or acetabular fractures are rare (15%-20%), and the complication by external iliac artery (EIA) injuries is even rarer, which can result in a mortality rate as high as 75%-83%. The mechanism of major artery damage caused by pelvic or acetabular fractures remains unclear. We report our experience with surgical treatment of 4 patients with acetabular roof column fracture and EIA injury. All the 4 patients underwent injury control resuscitation and surgery after admission. One patient died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), and the other 3 patients recovered smoothly. In these cases, as we presume, the occurrence of acetabular roof column fracture caused the EIA, which was connected to the iliopsoas muscle through soft tissues such as the iliac fascia, to be pulled into the fracture space along with the iliopsoas muscle and was cut directly by the fracture end; the EIA may also be punctured during transport and fracture reduction. Although acetabular roof column fractures with EIA injuries rarely occur, the consequences can be fatal. In such cases, clinicians should be highly vigilant about the possibility of large vessel injuries, and its early detection using threedimensional vascular reconstruction based on CT vessels or arterial interventional angiography can be critical for implementation of early treatment to save the limbs.

Epidemiological assessment of acetabular fractures in a level one trauma centre: A 7-Year observational study

PURPOSE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of the Acetabular fractures treated in a level one trauma centre of India. This study is one of the largest to provide first-hand information regarding the demography, fracture patterns, other associated injuries, and the hospital stay of acetabular fractures in India.

METHOD

Patients admitted with the diagnosis of acetabular fractures between January 2013 and November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of demographic data such as age and sex, mechanism of injury, other associated injuries, and the duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients with 313 fractures of the acetabulum were included in the study. Among the 305 patients, 268 (87.8%) were male and 37 (12.1%) were female, with a declining male to female ratio over the years. The mean age was 37.1 ± 13.2 years (range 14-84 years). During the seven years, the mean age of presentation progressively increased. Linear regression showed an increase from 33 to 40 years from 2013 to 2019 (R2 = 0.027). Road traffic injuries were the most common mechanism of injury, contributing to about 77.4% of all cases. Associated injuries were seen in 62% of total cases with multiple system involvement in 26.6% of patients. The most frequent pattern in this epidemiological study was an isolated posterior wall fracture (21.4%) while the isolated anterior wall was the least frequent (0.95%).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular fractures are increasing in numbers and with increasing knowledge so is their surgical management in our country. It shall be prudent to establish an integrated electronic national trauma registry to maintain complete documentation in all institutions dealing with trauma management to ascertain the changing trends of acetabular fracture patterns in the country over time.