Improving the Diagnosis of Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures: A New Imaging Protocol

Evaluation of Post-Operative Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Interventions: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) represent a significant challenge in orthopedic practice, demanding prompt intervention to restore function and mobility in affected individuals. Numerous surgical interventions have been developed to address these fractures, including internal fixation with devices such as the Femoral Neck System (FNS, DePuy Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA). However, the optimal fixation system remains unclear. Understanding the postoperative outcomes associated with these interventions is crucial for optimizing patient care and informing treatment decisions.

Significance

This PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review evaluates the efficacy and safety of the Femoral Neck System relative to other operative treatment options. Clinical and safety outcomes included mortality, perioperative complications, postoperative complications at 1 year, and reoperation.

Results

A total of 117 studies with 68,567 patients with FNF treated with internal fixation were identified. Of these, thirteen included FNS as a treatment arm (1078 patients). Due to heterogeneity in study designs and populations, only the eleven studies that directly compared FNS to other operative treatments, and 2 non-comparative studies that treated with FNS were included in the systematic review. Seven of the eleven included studies had high risk of bias, 2 had moderate risk of bias, and 2 had low risk of bias. FNS groups had similar or significantly lower incidences of postoperative complications, reoperations, and mortality compared to cannulated screw, cancellous screw, or dynamic or sliding hip screw groups in all studies.

Conclusion

FNS can be a safe and effective operative treatment option for FNF. Safety outcomes and reoperation rates are comparable between patients treated with FNS and patients treated with cannulated screws, cancellous screws, and dynamic or sliding hips screws. Future prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of FNS relative to other operative treatment options.

Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures: Complex Injuries With High Rates of Femoral Shaft Nonunion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate nonunion rates and risk factors in patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Two Level I trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Two hundred seven patients treated for ipsilateral femoral neck (AO/OTA 31-B) and shaft (AO/OTA 32A-C) fractures from 2013 to 2022. Patients with less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome of this study was femoral shaft nonunion. Risk factors for nonunion were evaluated, including smoking, open fracture, delay to full weight-bearing, blood transfusions, and AO/OTA classification.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven patients were initially identified, but only 154 patients had sufficient follow-up and were included in final analysis. The mean age was 38.9 years (SD = 15.3), and injury severity score was 19.5 (9.7). One hundred ten patients (71%) were male and 69 (45%) required intensive care unit care. Thirty-eight patients (25%) experienced an open fracture, and 44 fractures (29%) were AO/OTA Type C. Thirty patients (20%) underwent initial external fixation, and 88 patients (57%) received a perioperative transfusion. Thirty-four patients (22%) developed a femoral shaft nonunion, and 5 (3%) experienced a surgical site infection. Nonunion was associated with perioperative blood transfusion, AO/OTA Type C fracture, postoperative non-weight-bearing, and delay to full weight-bearing ≥12 weeks. Multivariable regression identified perioperative blood transfusion ≥3 (risk ratio [RR] = 1.91; CI, 1.12-2.72; P = 0.02) and AO/OTA Type C fracture (RR = 2.45; CI, 1.50-3.34; P = 0.001) as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures remain difficult injuries to treat. Much attention is given to diagnosis and treatment of the femoral neck component. These results suggest that successful treatment of the femoral shaft component presents its own challenges with high nonunion rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Occult femoral fracture: Be aware of dual energy computed tomography

A 74-year-old man was admitted to our emergency department following minor trauma. Plain radiographs and standard computed tomography (CT) scans revealed no signs of fractures. Subsequently, virtual noncalcium (VNCa) images were reconstructed, showing a linear area of bone marrow edema (BME) resembling a femoral neck fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to confirm the presence of BME and an associated intraspongious fracture. In an emergency setting, dual-energy CT (DECT) and VNCa images can successfully identify occult femoral fractures, especially in patients with mild symptoms and minor trauma, thereby preventing misdiagnosis.

Incidence of Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

OBJECTIVES

To identify the incidence, patient characteristics, and effectiveness of radiographic screening methods for detecting ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures in pediatric and adolescent trauma patients.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric trauma hospital.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients younger than 18 years treated for a femoral shaft fracture between 2004 and 2018 were reviewed. Pathologic (metabolic bone disease or bone lesion), periprosthetic, and penetrating traumatic femoral shaft fractures were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS

Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, treatment methods, and associated injuries were analyzed. Pretreatment x-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed for the identification of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures.

RESULTS

Among the 840 pediatric patients included in this study, 4 patients (0.5%) sustained ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. All the femoral neck fractures were observed in adolescents (aged 13-17 years) and involved in high-energy traumas. In adolescents involved in high-energy trauma, the incidence increased to 1.7%. Pretreatment sensitivity of both x-rays and CT scans was only 50% for the detection of femoral neck fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures in pediatric patients are rare, occurring in adolescents involved in high-energy trauma. The findings suggest the need for a selective, rather than routine, use of CT scans based on the patient's age and the mechanism of injury. The use of alternative imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging should be considered to balance diagnostic accuracy while minimizing radiation exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

MRI characteristics of radiographically occult femoral neck fractures in trauma patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures

PURPOSE

Ipsilateral femoral neck fractures can be seen alongside femoral shaft fractures in high-velocity trauma patients. These neck fractures are often occult on radiographs and CT, and can have a significant impact on patient outcomes if not treated promptly. Limited protocol pelvic MRI has been used to increase sensitivity for these occult fractures. Detailed characterization of these fractures on MRI is lacking.

METHODS

427 consecutive trauma patients presenting to our emergency department who had known femoral diaphyseal fractures but no ipsilateral femoral neck fracture on radiographs or CT were included in this study. These patients were scanned using a limited protocol MRI with coronal T1 and coronal STIR sequences. Presence of an ipsilateral femoral neck fracture and imaging characteristics of the fracture were obtained.

RESULTS

31 radiographically occult ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were found, representing 7% of all cases. All neck fractures were incomplete. All fractures originated along the lateral cortex of the femoral neck and extended medially towards the junction of the medial femoral neck and the lesser trochanter. 58% (18/31) were vertical in orientation. 61% (19/31) did not demonstrate any appreciate edema on STIR images.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of limited protocol MRI protocol increases sensitivity for detection of femoral neck fractures in the setting of ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures not seen on radiograph or CT imaging. We describe the characteristic MR imaging features of these fractures.

Pelvic Ring Injuries: Stable or Not?

Pelvic ring injuries occur in varying severity and in vastly different patient demographics. Knowledge regarding which of these injuries require surgical intervention and which can be managed nonsurgically continues to evolve. Previous studies have shown validated criteria for sacral fractures and the posterior ring, explored the role of examination under anesthesia, and other forms of dynamic imaging. Although there is substantial information available, a comprehensive synthesis of this information is lacking. This article provides a comprehensive review of radiographic markers suggestive of stability, discusses treatment strategies, and proposes a treatment algorithm that is easily understood and applicable to not only those with a trauma background but also the general orthopaedic surgeon who will see these injuries frequently while on call.

Capsular distension in high-energy femoral shaft fractures is associated with occult femoral neck fracture: a preliminary retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between hip capsular distension, the computed tomography (CT) capsular sign, and lipohemarthrosis as they relate to occult femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the setting of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (FSF).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and forty-two patients with high-energy FSF and no evidence of FNF on preoperative radiographs and pelvis CT. All patients were stabilized with non-reconstruction style nails.

INTERVENTION

Pelvis CT scans were examined for hip capsular distension irrespective of the other side, differing side-to-side measurements of capsular distension (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and lipohemarthrosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

FNF was observed for on postoperative radiographs. Relative risk (RR), number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity (SN), and specificity (SP) were determined.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (24.0%) had capsular distension. Forty-two patients (17.4%) had differing capsular measurements (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and 16 (6.6%) had symmetrical distension from bilateral hip effusions. Eight patients (3.3%) had lipohemarthrosis. Four FNFs (1.7%) were identified. Three patients had capsular distension, 2 had CT capsular signs, and 1 had lipohemarthrosis. The last patient had no CT abnormalities. Only capsular distension (RR = 10, CI = 1.001-90, P = 0.049; SN = 75%, SP = 77%; NNT = 22) and lipohemarthrosis (RR = 23, CI = 1.6-335, P = 0.022; SN = 50%, SP = 96%; NNT = 8) were associated with occult FNF.

CONCLUSIONS

Capsular distension is associated with FNF irrespective of the contralateral hip. Preemptive stabilization using a reconstruction nail could be considered in the setting of capsular distension or lipohemarthrosis to prevent displacement of an occult FNF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III.

Evaluating the utility of post-reduction imaging for simple hip joint dislocations: Is computed tomography always necessary?

Introduction

Following closed reduction of hip dislocations, computed tomography (CT) is considered standard of care to identify occult fractures or intra-articular loose bodies that may be missed on X-ray. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of post-reduction X-rays and the usefulness of subsequent post-reduction CT imaging.

Methods

All patients presenting to our hospital system for traumatic hip dislocations from 2013 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were included if they had a simple dislocation of a native hip, underwent closed reduction, and received post-reduction X-ray and CT imaging. A sensitivity analysis was performed for the detection of associated fractures and intraarticular loose bodies by post-reduction X-ray, using CT as a reference standard.

Results

Thirty-five subjects with a mean age of 26 years were included. Post-reduction CT revealed 6 fractures and 3 loose bodies, whereas post-reduction X-ray identified 3/6 (50%) fractures and 3/3 (100%) loose bodies. Four cases received operative management, all of which were identified by X-ray. Post-reduction X-ray had a sensitivity of 67% for identifying pathology that was subsequently found on CT, and a sensitivity of 100% for identifying pathology requiring surgery. Of the 13 cases with pre-reduction CT scans, none had new findings identified on post-reduction CT.

Conclusions

Post-reduction X-rays are effective in the evaluation of acute pathology associated with closed reduction of traumatic hip dislocations, especially for cases requiring operative management. Our findings suggest that if a fracture or loose body was not identified on post-reduction X-ray, a post-reduction CT added no value in surgical decision-making and was not necessary.

Protocolised MRI as an adjunct to CT in the diagnosis of femoral neck fracture in high energy ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures - A break-even analysis

BACKGROUND

In high-energy femoral shaft fractures (FSFs), ipsilateral femoral neck fractures (FNFs) can be missed by conventional trauma computed topography (CT) imaging, resulting in increased treatment costs and patient complications. Preliminary evidence suggests that a rapid, limited-sequence pelvis and hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol can identify these occult fractures and be feasibly implemented in the trauma setting. This study aims to establish the economic break-even point for implementing such an MRI protocol in all high-energy FSFs.

METHODS

We used an adapted break-even economic tool to determine whether the costs of a targeted MRI protocol can be offset by cost-savings achieved through prevention of missed fractures (thus avoiding prolonged admission and re-operation). Sensitivity analyses were performed to demonstrate reliability of the economic modelling across a range of assumptions.

RESULTS

Assuming a baseline of FNFs missed on CT of 12%, an MRI cost of £129 and cost of treating each missed FNF of £2457.5, the equation yielded a break-even rate of 7% and absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 5%, indicating that for every 100 FSFs, MRI would need to diagnose 5 of the 12 missed FNF to be economically viable (number needed to treat (NNT)=20). Economic viability was maintained even at double the cost of MRI, while increasing the cost of treating each complication served to reduce the ARR further, increasing cost-savings.

CONCLUSION

A rapid, limited-sequence MRI protocol to exclude occult ipsilateral FNFs in all high-energy FSFs appears to be economically justified measure. Further research exploring the feasibility of such a protocol, as well as the role of intra-operative fluoroscopy in this context, is required.

Antegrade versus retrograde nailing of proximal femur fractures: A cortical diameter based study

Background

Retrograde nailing of proximal femoral shaft fractures is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with proximal femur fractures undergoing antegrade versus retrograde intramedullary nailing (AIMN vs RIMN) and determine the safety and efficacy of RIMN.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on 54 patients undergoing femoral IMN for proximal femoral shaft fractures at an urban level one trauma institution between January 2016 and July 2021.Fracture distance from the lesser trochanter (LT) was recorded and used to calculate the number of cortical diameters (NCD) from the LT. Proximal femur fractures were defined as < 3 NCD. AIMN and RIMN fixation was utilized in 31 (57.4%) and 23 (42.6%) patients, respectively. Outcomes measures included pre-/postoperative true translational and angular displacement (TTD and TAD), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), union rate, time to union, complications, and reoperations.

Results

AIMN and RIMN groups were similar in terms of age, sex, BMI, tobacco use, diabetes, ASA classification >2, AO/OTA classification, preoperative TTD or TAD, open fractures, or ballistic fractures. The AIMN group, had a shorter measured distance from the LT (47.0 vs. 66.1 mm, p = 0.04) but the difference in NCD was not significant (1.4 vs. 2.0, p = 0.07). Among patients with isolated IMN procedures, the RIMN group had shorter operative times (142.3 vs. 178.5 min, p = 0.01) and less EBL (100 vs. 250 mL, p = 0.008). There was no observed intergroup difference in terms of postoperative TTD/TAD, union rate, time to union, complications, or reoperations.

Conclusion

RIMN is a viable treatment option for proximal femoral shaft fractures that results in less operative time, less blood loss, and no detectable differences in union, reoperations, or complications.

Level of evidence

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: case series from a single Level-I trauma centre and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Uncommon but increasingly diagnosed, ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture represents a complex injury pattern with challenging management. The conundrum involves optimal diagnostic modality, timing of surgery, sequence of fixation, and the choice of implant.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective review was conducted at a Level-I trauma centre to assess the outcome of concomitant femoral neck and shaft fractures managed with various implants and attempt to provide solutions to the aforementioned queries. The time between injury and definitive surgery, choice of implant, sequence of fixation, time to fracture union, and complications were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were included in the study wherein associated neck fracture was identified preoperatively in 93.5% of patients. In patients with isolated limb fractures, the mean time to surgery was 16.7 ± 5 h whereas patients with polytrauma witnessed an average delay of 4.6 days before fracture fixation. 72% of patients were managed by dual implants and in the remaining both the fractures were addressed using a single implant with no union time difference amongst implants. The mean time to the union for neck fracture was 21.7 weeks and 24.2 weeks for shaft femur fracture. 21.7% patients developed delayed union of fracture shaft femur and infection complicated 11% shaft fractures.

CONCLUSION

Although, 6% neck fractures were missed in the series, we advocate that careful pre/intra/post-operative fluoroscopic evaluation of the femoral neck along with a low threshold for a pre-operative CT scan remains the optimal diagnostic modality while avoiding universal employment of computed tomography (CT). With fracture union being unaffected by implant choice, authors suggest that anatomical fixation of the femoral neck is of paramount importance followed by restoration of the length, alignment and rotation of the femoral shaft, and the implant selection primarily depends on surgeon's experience and the pattern of injury.

The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Diagnosis of High-Energy Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the most common femoral shaft fracture morphology associated with an ipsilateral femoral neck fracture in high-energy blunt trauma using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

219 consecutive patients sustaining 228 femoral shaft fractures from high-energy blunt trauma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Fracture patterns were analyzed using the OTA/AO classification system. In addition, location of the fracture was measured as the distance from the distal aspect of the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral shaft fracture.

RESULTS

An OTA/AO 31 type fracture was seen in 16.5% (20/121) of patients presenting with OTA/AO 32-A type fractures, 12% (6/50) of patients with OTA/AO 32-B type fractures, and 26.3% (15/57) of patients with OTA/AO 32-C type fractures. The fractures that occurred in the middle or distal third of the femur shaft constituted 95.1% (39/41).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, patients with middle and distal third OTA/AO 32-C type fractures had the highest association with an ipsilateral OTA/AO 31 type fracture. OTA/AO 32-A2 and 32-A3 type fractures had the highest association with femoral neck fractures seen only on MRI. The data presented suggest continued usage of the rapid sequence pelvic MRI for all patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures in whom a femoral neck fracture was not seen on an x-ray or a computed tomography scan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dual-Energy CT to Diagnose Occult Femoral Neck Fracture in MRI-Contraindicated Patient: A Case Report

CASE

A 79-year-old woman presented after a ground level fall with the inability to bear weight on her right hip. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) imaging were negative for a femoral neck fracture. Her medical comorbidities precluded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), so dual-energy CT with focused evaluation for bone edema was performed, identifying a femoral neck fracture that was stabilized surgically.

CONCLUSION

Dual-energy CT with processing for edema can successfully identify nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in MRI-contraindicated patients. This imaging modality could be useful for diagnosing femoral neck stress fractures and ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients sustaining high-energy femoral shaft fractures.

Prevention of Unplanned Surgery Due to Delayed Diagnosis of Occult Ipsilateral Femoral Neck Fractures Associated with Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Study of the CT Capsular Sign with Lipohemarthrosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of using the computed tomography (CT) capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis of the hip joint as a selective indicator for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip or prophylactic fixation of the ipsilateral femoral neck for the prevention of unplanned surgery due to delayed diagnosis of occult ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

We evaluated the CT capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis in patients with a high-energy femoral shaft fracture without a preoperative diagnosis of an ipsilateral femoral neck fracture. The CT capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis was considered positive when the side-to-side difference in anterior capsular distension was >1 mm and lipohemarthrosis was seen on soft-tissue-window CT images. A positive CT capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis prompts preoperative hip MRI or prophylactic femoral neck fixation with a reconstruction nail.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients were included. Eight patients were preoperatively diagnosed with a displaced or hairline ipsilateral femoral neck fracture, whereas the remaining 148 patients showed no ipsilateral femoral neck fracture on radiographs and bone-window CT images. On soft-tissue-window CT images, 29 (19.6%) of the 148 patients had a positive CT capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis. We performed preoperative MRI for 3 patients; in the remaining 26 patients, prophylactic femoral neck fixation was performed with a reconstruction nail. We identified 5 occult ipsilateral femoral neck fractures among the 29 patients with a positive sign: 2 on preoperative MRI scans, 2 on immediate postoperative radiographs, and 1 on radiographs made 6 weeks postoperatively. In 119 patients with a negative sign, no occult ipsilateral femoral neck fracture was identified. All occult ipsilateral femoral neck fractures healed without further displacement of the femoral neck. Consequently, additional unplanned surgery for delayed diagnosis of occult ipsilateral femoral neck fracture was not required.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the CT capsular sign with lipohemarthrosis as a selective indicator for preoperative hip MRI or prophylactic femoral neck fixation with a reconstruction nail in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures is effective for preventing unplanned surgery due to delayed diagnosis of occult ipsilateral femoral neck fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Implementation of a novel MRI protocol for diagnosing femoral neck fractures in high energy femoral shaft fractures: One year results

INTRODUCTION

Preliminary results using a novel rapid-sequence MRI to diagnose ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in patients sustaining high-energy femoral shaft fractures have been favorable compared to radiographic and CT imaging alone. To evaluate and optimize this new institutional imaging protocol further, we reviewed our results one year after implementation.

METHODS

Rapid-sequence MRI was added to the imaging evaluation of patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures without femoral neck fractures identified on radiographs or CT imaging. Data was retrospectively reviewed from a consecutive series of patients who met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

From September 2018 through September 2019, 114 patients sustained 121 high-energy femoral shaft fractures. The average patient age was 29.9 years, 73.7% (84/114) of patients were male, and 16.5% (20/121) were open fractures. Of patients indicated for a rapid-sequence MRI, 86% (92/107) underwent MR imaging. 5% (6/121) of patients had an ipsilateral femoral neck fracture identified on radiographs alone. Three additional femoral neck fractures were identified with CT imaging for an initial incidence of 7.4% (9/121). MRI identified 10 additional non-displaced femoral neck fractures, three complete and seven incomplete fractures, for an incidence of 15.7% (19/121). All identified femoral neck fractures were stabilized.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The addition of rapid-sequence MRI of the pelvis in patients with high-energy femoral shaft fractures reliably increases the diagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures not identified with standard imaging. There were no cases of missed/delayed femoral neck fractures in patients with a negative MRI. This new imaging protocol effectively and safely improves the diagnosis of this injury pattern.

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. When do we need further image screening of the hip?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to identify patterns of femoral diaphyseal fractures which are associated with fractures of the ipsilateral femoral neck according to the AO classification. We propose an algorithm of investigation based on plain radiographs, recognizing cases that need additional screening with computed tomography.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational retrospective study included patients with combined diaphyseal and femoral neck fractures. These patients were retrieved from a total of 1398 patients with the diagnoses of diaphyseal fractures of the femur, who were admitted to our hospital for surgical treatment between January 2009 and October 2019. All included cases had both fractures analyzed for their geometry and were classified according to the AO Classification, seeking to find a correlation between the types of fractures.

RESULTS

Sixteen diaphyseal fractures associated with ipsilateral neck fractures were detected during the period. The distribution of the diaphyseal fractures according to the AO Classification was as follows: 5 of type A3 (31,2%) 6 type B2 (37.5%), 1 type B3 (6,2%), 2 type C2 (12,5%) and 2 type C3 (12,5%). One A2 femoral fracture occurred during the surgical procedure. No type A1 fractures were detected.

CONCLUSION

The patterns of high-energy diaphyseal fractures (A3, B and C) have a higher prevalence of associated ipsilateral neck fractures. Our study suggests that routine additional methods of image investigation of femoral neck fractures may be unnecessary for diaphyseal fractures type A1 and A2.

Dual-construct fixation is recommended in ipsilateral femoral neck fractures with infra-isthmus shaft fracture: A STROBE compliant study

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors related to osteosynthesis failure in patients with concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures, including old age; smoking habit; comminuted fragments; infra-isthmus fracture; angular malreduction; unsatisfactory reduction (fracture gap >5 mm); and treatment with single construct.Patients over the age of 20 with concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures diagnosed at a level one medical center between 2003 and 2019 were included. Treatment modalities included single construct with/without an antirotational screw for the neck and dual constructs. Radiographic outcomes were assessed from anteroposterior and lateral hip radiographs at follow-up. Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical variables. The presence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, delayed union, atrophic or hypertrophic nonunion of the femoral shaft fracture, and loss of reduction were identified as factors related to treatment failure.A total of 22 patients were included in this study. The average age was 58.5 years, and the majority was male (68.2%). The minimum radiographic follow-up duration was 12 months, and the median follow-up time was 12 (interquartile range 12-24) months.Femoral neck osteosynthesis failed in 3 patients, whereas femoral shaft osteosynthesis failed in 12 patients. Fisher exact test demonstrated the failure of femoral shaft osteosynthesis was significantly more frequent in the single-construct cohort in 16 infra-isthmus femoral fracture cases (P = .034).In ipsilateral femoral neck and infra-isthmus shaft fractures, it is better to treat the neck and shaft fractures with separate implants (dual constructs).In a dual-construct cohort, separate plate fixation of the femoral shaft achieved a better result in terms of bone union than retrograde nailing of the shaft (bone union rate: 4/8 vs 0/2).

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures treated with bridge-link type combined fixation system

BACKGROUND

Although many treatments for ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures have been developed, controversy exists regarding their optimal management. The purpose of this retrospective study was to discuss the effectiveness of the bridge-link type combined fixation system (BCFS) and evaluate functional outcomes in treating patients with these complex fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 cases of ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures treated from January 2012 to December 2016. All cases were treated by BCFS combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO). Clinical and radiographic data were collected during regular post-operative follow-up visits. Functional outcomes were determined according to the Friedman and Wyman scoring system.

RESULTS

The proximal femoral fractures were emergency diagnoses in 11 cases and delayed diagnoses in 3 cases. The delay time was 5-6 days, with an average of 5.3 days. The mean operation time was 179.6 min (range 135-231 min) with a blood loss volume that ranged from 430 to 535 ml (average 483.6 ml). Follow-up was conducted in 13 cases between 9 and 30 months post-operation, with an average follow-up time of 17.3 months. The proximal femoral fractures were united in 12 cases at the final follow-up. One case had nonunion 13 months after the operation, underwent valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy, and healed 6 months later. The femoral shaft fractures obtained rigid union at the latest follow-up in 12 cases. One case endured nonunion 12 months after the operation. After the revision surgery and iliac bone grafting, the fracture healed 6 months later. Eight of the cases had good functional results, 4 had fair results, and results were poor in 1 case at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of ipsilateral proximal femoral and shaft fractures with BCFS in combination with MIPPO demonstrated a high likelihood of union for both fractures and good functional results.