Brace Effectiveness Is Related to 3-Dimensional Plane Parameters in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Segmental deformity markers offer novel indicators of deformity progression risk in deformity-matched adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

PURPOSE

Identification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with mild curvatures who pose significant risk of progressing to severe levels of curvatures is of paramount importance for clinical care. This study aimed to compare segmental deformity changes in AIS sub-cohorts that are dichotomised by progression status.

METHODS

Thirty-six female participants with Lenke 1 AIS curves were investigated with sequential MRIs during growth. Scans were reformatted to measure orthogonal segmental parameters, including sagittal/coronal wedging angles and axial rotation angles. Participants were dichotomised by progression. Two-tailed, independent sample t-tests were used to compare sub-cohort multi-segmental and segmental deformity parameters. Measurements were compared at each scan number and variable rates of change were determined using actual time between measures.

RESULTS

AIS progression status sub-cohorts were comparable at scan 1 for multi-segmental deformity parameters (e.g. major thoracic curve angle, rib hump, kyphosis) (P > 0.05). However, apical measures of coronal IVD wedging, axial IVD rotation and axial vertebral rotation were segmental parameters at scan 1 which were larger for participants whose AIS would later go on to clinically progress (all P < 0.05). Measures of segmental hypokyphosis were comparable between groups. As development was tracked at each subsequent scan, coronal and axial plane differences between groups increased in both magnitude and number of differences.

CONCLUSION

Initial disparity and then subsequent increasing magnitude of change of axial rotation may indicate a higher propensity to clinically progress in the future. This knowledge hopes to provide useful management information for AIS care providers and prognostic education for patients alike.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study based on EOS imaging system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of bracing on apical vertebral derotation and explore the factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. For patients with AIS, vertebral rotation causes cosmetic appearance abnormalities and acts as an indicator for curve progression. However, there have been few studies investigating the precise derotation effects of bracing for apical vertebra. The application of EOS imaging system enables quantitative evaluation of vertebral rotation in the axial plane in a standing position.

METHODS

There were 82 eligible patients enrolled in current study, who underwent EOS imaging evaluation before and immediately after bracing. The clinical demographic data (age, gender, Risser sign and menstrual status) were recorded. The correlation analyses between derotation effects and key parameters (age, pre-brace Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, vertebral rotation, pelvis axial rotation and apical vertebral level) were performed. The in-brace derotation effects stratified by gender, Risser sign, apical vertebral level, menarche status, coronal balance and sagittal balance were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The rotation of apical vertebra was decreased from 8.8 ± 6.0 degrees before bracing to 3.8 ± 3.3 degrees immediately after bracing (p < 0.001), and the derotation rate was 49.2 ± 38.3%. The derotation degrees in brace was significantly correlated with major curve Cobb angle (r = 0.240, p = 0.030), minor curve Cobb angle (r = 0.256, p = 0.020) and total curve Cobb angle (r = 0.266, p = 0.016). Both the pre-brace apical vertebral rotation and apical vertebral level were significantly correlated with derotation effects in brace (p < 0.001). Patients with thoracic major curve showed worse derotation effects than those with lumbar major curve (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with coronal balance showed better in-brace derotation effects than those with coronal decompensation (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A satisfactory apical vertebral derotation rate (approximately 50%) could be obtained immediately after bracing in AIS patients. Pre-brace Cobb angle of curve, pre-brace apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral level and coronal balance exhibited close associations with in-brace derotation effects of apical vertebra.

Association between trunk rotation and pelvic rotation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested an association between pelvic rotation (PR) and scoliotic deformity in severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but none have investigated this relationship in mild to moderate AIS.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between PR and trunk rotation in mild to moderate AIS.

METHODS

This was a case-control study. The cases were 32 AIS patients with PR in the opposite direction to the thoracic curve, and the controls were 32 AIS patients with PR in the same direction as the thoracic curve. All patients were assessed with the Adams forwards bend test. Type II trunk rotation was selected as exposure. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between PR direction and types of trunk rotation while accounting for confounders. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse the relationships between PR magnitude and the angle of trunk rotation (ATR).

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed an unadjusted OR of 9.13 (95% CI 2.92-28.50, P< 0.001), and adjustment for sex and Cobb angle only slightly changed the OR (adjusted OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 2.51-27.01; P= 0.001). The concave/convex ratio was associated with ATR measurements in both cases (β=-0.379; P= 0.030) and controls (β=-0.468, P= 0.008).

CONCLUSION

An association was found between PR and trunk rotation, which may help achieve more effective physiotherapy in mild to moderate AIS.

Higher Baseline Serum Myokine of FSTL1 May Serve as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Successful Brace Treatment in Girls With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether myokine, which is related to exercise and muscle mass, could serve as a biomarker for predicting bracing outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several risk factors have been documented to be associated with bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, serum biomarkers have not been extensively explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Skeletally immature females with AIS, without previous histories of bracing or surgery, were included. Peripheral blood was collected at the time of the bracing prescription. Baseline serum concentrations of 8 myokines [apelin, fractalkine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, erythropoietin, osteonectin, fatty-acid-binding protein 3, follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1), and musclin] were measured by multiplex assays. Patients were followed up until weaned from bracing and then designated as a "failure" (defined as Cobb angle progression >5°) or "success." A logistic regression analysis was performed that accounted for serum myokines and skeletal maturity.

RESULTS

We included 117 patients, with 27 in the failure group. Patients in the failure group had lower initial Risser sign and lower baseline serum levels of myokines, including FSTL1 (2217.3 ± 617.0 vs . 1369.3 ± 704.9, P = 0.002), apelin [116.5 (12.0, 335.9) vs . 83.5 (10.5, 221.1), P = 0.016], fractalkine (979.6 ± 457.8 vs . 743.8 ± 456.1, P = 0.020), and musclin [211.3 (16.3, 370.3) vs . 67.8 (15.5, 325.6), P = 0.049]. Following adjusted analysis, serum FSTL1 [odds ratio = 10.460; (2.213-49.453)] was determined to be predictive of bracing effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Patients who failed AIS bracing had significantly lower mean baseline levels of FSTL1 than those who achieved success. FSTL1 may serve as a biomarker that can inform outcomes after bracing.

Associations between spinal flexibility and bracing outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review

OBJECTIVES

To identify the existing assessment methods used to measure the spinal flexibility of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis before bracing and to evaluate the predictive effect of spinal flexibility on bracing outcomes.

METHODS

A broad literature search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to obtain relevant information about spinal flexibility and bracing outcomes. All literature was retrieved by October 14, 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were meticulously determined. The quality of each included study and the level of evidence were evaluated by the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, respectively.

RESULTS

After screening 1863 articles retrieved from databases, a total of 14 studies with 2261 subjects were eligible for the final analysis in this review. Overall, nine methods of flexibility assessment were identified, including supine radiographs, supine lateral bending radiographs, lateral bending radiographs but without clear positions, hanging radiographs, fulcrum bending physical method, and ultrasound imaging in the positions of supine, prone, sitting with side bending and prone with side bending. In addition, five studies demonstrated that flexibility had a strong correlation with in-brace correction, and eleven studies illustrated that spinal flexibility was a predictive factor of the bracing outcomes of initial in-brace Cobb angle, initial in-brace correction rate, curve progression, and curve regression. The results of GRADE demonstrated a moderate-evidence rating for the predictive value of spinal flexibility.

CONCLUSION

Supine radiography was the most prevalent method for measuring spinal flexibility at the pre-brace stage. Spinal flexibility was strongly correlated with the in-brace Cobb angle or correction rate, and moderate evidence supported that spinal flexibility could predict bracing outcomes.

A feasibility study of application of purpose-design frame and 3-D clinical ultrasound in assessment and design of spinal orthoses for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

The immediate in-orthosis correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a useful prognostic parameter for the long-term orthotic treatment outcome. The 3-D clinical ultrasound technique is considered a noninvasive alternative to assess scoliotic deformities that could be applied in the orthotic treatment of AIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a purpose-design assessment frame in estimating biomechanical effects of the controlling pads of a spinal orthosis under the guidance of the ultrasound system.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects with AIS were recruited and arranged to position inside the assessment frame, and controlling pads were applied strategically while the scoliotic deformities were assessed by clinical ultrasound to obtain at least 30% curvature correction, and the body shape was then captured using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture system, and spinal orthoses were subsequently fabricated. The preorthosis and immediate in-orthosis coronal and sagittal X-rays were used for comparison.

RESULTS

X-ray assessments showed that the mean coronal Cobb angle and lumbar lordosis of the subjects from the preorthosis to immediate in-orthosis visits decreased significantly ( p < 0.05) from 29.6° to 16.6°, and from 47.2° to 35.3°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This feasibility study showed that the proposed method would have a good potential to improve orthotic treatment outcome in a documented approach that should be considered for implementation into routine clinical practice aiming to reduce the chance of deformity deterioration leading to surgical intervention. However, a controlled group study is required to compare the results.

Association of success of brace treatment and various aspects of in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Although skeletal maturity and brace wear time contribute to the success of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the extent of initial in-brace correction for ensuring successful outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesized that the degree of initial in-brace correction correlates with brace success in patients with AIS.

METHOD

The study included 135 AIS patients with a major Cobb angle of 20°-40° treated with a thoracic lumbosacral orthosis for at least one year and followed up for skeletal maturity. The subjects were divided into two groups: the skeletally immature group (group I, n = 72), who met the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial study protocol at the start of brace treatment, and the skeletally mature group (group M, n = 63). Treatment success was defined as not needing surgical treatment and a major Cobb angle <40° at the end of brace treatment.

RESULTS

In both groups, the mean major Cobb angles before treatment, while wearing the brace, and at the end of brace treatment were 30.6°/31.7°, 22.9°/24.2°, and 38.8°/33.9° (p < 0.05), respectively, and the treatment success rate was 56.9% and 77.8%, respectively (p < 0.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed the following risk factors: Risser grade 0 in group I, major Cobb angles before treatment, initial in-brace major Cobb angle, and in-brace correction rate in both groups. Cutoff values of in-brace major Cobb angle for treatment success calculated by ROC curve in groups I and M were 24° and 29°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In-brace major scoliosis correction of <25° in patients with immature skeletal status and <30° in patients with mature skeletal structure should be aimed at to achieve significant brace treatment success.

Three-dimensional ultrasonography could be a potential non-ionizing tool to evaluate vertebral rotation of subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography is nonionizing and has been demonstrated to be a reliable tool for scoliosis assessment, including coronal and sagittal curvatures. It shows a great potential for axial vertebral rotation (AVR) evaluation, yet its validity and reliability need to be further demonstrated.

Materials and Methods

Twenty patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (coronal Cobb: 26.6 ± 9.1°) received 3D ultrasound scan for twice, 10 were scanned by the same operator, and the other 10 by different operators. EOS Bi-planar x-rays and 3D scan were conducted on another 29 patients on the same day. Two experienced 3D ultrasonographic researchers, with different experiences on AVR measurement, evaluated the 3D ultrasonographic AVR of the 29 patients (55 curves; coronal Cobb angle: 26.9 ± 11.3°). The gold standard AVR was determined from the 3D reconstruction of coronal and sagittal EOS radiographs. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), mean absolute difference (MAD), standard error measurements (SEM), and Bland-Altman's bias were reported to evaluate the intra-operator and inter-operator/rater reliabilities of 3D ultrasonography. The reliability of 3D ultrasonographic AVR measurements was further validated using inter-method with that of EOS.

Results

ICCs for intra-operator and inter-operator/rater reliability assessment were all greater than 0.95. MAD, SEM, and bias for the 3D ultrasonographic AVRs were no more than 2.2°, 2.0°, and 0.5°, respectively. AVRs between both modalities were strongly correlated (R 2 = 0.901) and not significantly different (p = 0.205). Bland-Altman plot also shows that the bias was less than 1°, with no proportional bias between the difference and mean of expected and radiographic Cobb angles.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that 3D ultrasonography is valid and reliable to evaluate AVR in AIS patients. 3D ultrasonography can be a potential tool for screening and following up subjects with AIS and evaluating the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments.

Predictors of Clinically Meaningful Results of Bracing in a Large Cohort of Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis Reaching the End of Conservative Treatment

BACKGROUND

We need good outcome predictors to maximize the treatment efficiency of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The in-brace correction has shown an important predictive effect on brace failure, while the influence of other variables is still debated. We aimed to identify new outcome predictors from a big prospective database of AIS.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

AIS between 21 and 45°, Risser 0-2, brace prescription during the observation, treatment conclusion. All of the participants followed a personalized conservative approach according to the SOSORT Guidelines.

OUTCOMES

End of growth below 30°-40°-50°. The regression model included age, BMI, Cobb angle, ATR, TRACE score, real brace wear (RBW), and in-brace correction (IBC).

RESULTS

A total of 1050 patients, 84% females, ages 12.1 ± 1.1, 28.2 ± 7.9° Cobb. IBC increased by 30%, 24%, and 23% the odds of ending treatment below 30°, 40°, and 50°, respectively. The OR did not change after the covariate adjustment. Cobb angle and ATR at the start also showed a predictive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic evaluation of IBC in clinics is useful for individuating the patient response to brace treatment more accurately, even in relation to the Cobb angle and ATR degrees at the start. Further studies are needed to increase the knowledge on predictors of AIS treatment results.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis that affects children aged 10-18 years old, manifesting in a three-dimensional spinal deformity. This study aimed to explore outcome measures used in defining AIS treatment success. Particularly, analyzing the extent of qualitative and quantitative (radiographic and quality of life domains) measures to evaluate AIS and whether AIS treatment approaches (surgical, bracing and physiotherapy) influences outcomes used as proxies of treatment success.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to conduct a systematic scoping review with 654 search queries. 158 papers met the inclusion criteria and were screened for data extraction. Extractable variables included: study characteristics, study participant characteristics, type of study, type of intervention approach and outcome measures.

RESULTS

All 158 studies measured quantitative outcomes. 61.38% of papers used radiographic outcomes whilst 38.62% of papers used quantitative quality of life outcomes to evaluate treatment success. Irrespective of treatment intervention utilized, the type of quantitative outcome measure recorded were similar in proportion. Moreover, of the radiographic outcome measures, the subcategory Cobb angle was predominantly used across all intervention approaches. For quantitative quality of life measures, questionnaires investigating multiple domains such as SRS were primarily used as proxies of AIS treatment success across all intervention approaches.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that no articles employed qualitative measures of describing the psychosocial implications of AIS in defining treatment success. Although quantitative measures have merit in clinical diagnoses and management, there is increasing value in using qualitative methods such as thematic analysis in guiding clinicians to develop a biopsychosocial approach for patient care.

Does Bracing Control the Progression of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Curves Higher Than 40°? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Routinely, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves that progress beyond 40° in skeletally immature adolescents require surgery. However, some adolescents with AIS and their parents utterly refuse surgery and insist on wearing a brace. Debate continues regarding the appropriateness of bracing for AIS curves exceeding 40° in patients who have rejected surgical intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to review the literature on the effectiveness of bracing and its predictive factors in largermagnitude AIS curves ≥40°. This study replicated the search strategy used by the PICOS system for formulating study questions, which include consideration of the patient/population (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), outcome (O), and study design (S). The search was conducted up to January 2022 in the following bibliographic online databases only in the English language: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two assessors reviewed the articles for qualification. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias at the study level using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The effect size across the studies was determined using standardized mean differences (Cohen's d) and 95% confidence intervals for the meta-analysis. Among the eight included moderate quality studies, evidence of potential publication bias (p <0.05) for the trials included was found in the Cobb angle outcome. Results obtained through meta-analysis indicated that the effectiveness of bracing in controlling Cobb angle progression in curves ≥40° is significantly positive. Additionally, initial curve severity, Risser stage, in-brace curve correction, curve type, and apical vertebral rotation were considered risk factors associated with brace effectiveness. This systematic review revealed that bracing could alter the normal course of AIS curves ≥40° in patients refusing posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, the suggested course for patients refusing PSF remains unclear because of the significant heterogeneity in the risk factors associated with bracing failure.

Evaluation of Chêneau brace in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with apical vertebral rotation

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common structural disorder of the spine in adolescents, often associated with structural deformities in both coronal and axial positions. Apical vertex rotation (AVR) is one of the main indicators of axial deformity in patients with scoliosis. Currently, there are few studies on the impact of AVR in the treatment of AIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the influence of different AVR on AIS after brace treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected from 106 AIS participants aged 11-16 years from the orthopedic outpatient clinic of the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University. Two orthopaedic professionals measured the Cobb angle, AVR and spinal mid-line offset before and after brace treatment, and descriptive and linear correlation analyses were used to determine the correlation between AVR and AIS measured parameters.

RESULTS

(1) In AIS volunteers with the same AVR, the treatment effect of AIS with lumbar predominant curvature was higher than that of AIS with thoracic predominant curvature. The treatment effect tended to decrease with increasing AVR. (2) Spinal mid-line deviation was associated with AVR. For patients with AIS with I and II degrees of AVR, the treatment effect of spinal mid-line offset after bracing is better. For AIS patients with AVR III degrees and above, the degree of correction of spinal mid-line offset decreases with the continuous correction of Cobb angle.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of AIS was found to be related to the severity of AVR. The efficacy of AIS with predominantly lumbar curvature was significantly higher than that of AIS with predominantly thoracic curvature. The efficacy of treatment of mid-line spinal deviation also decreased with increasing AVR.

Do the three-dimensional parameters of brace-wearing patients with AIS change when transitioning from standing to sitting position? A preliminary study on Lenke I

Background

Bracing is the most common conservative treatment for preventing the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in patients with a curve of 25°–40°. X-ray examinations are traditionally performed in the standing position. However, school-age teenagers may take more time to sit. Thus far, little is known about three-dimensional (3D) correction in the sitting position. Hence, this study aimed to determine the effects of standing and sitting positions on 3D parameters during brace correction.

Methods

We evaluated a single-center cohort of patients receiving conservative treatment for thoracic curvature (32 patients with AIS with a Lenke I curve). The 3D parameters of their standing and sitting positions were analyzed using the EOS imaging system during their first visit and after bracing.

Results

At the patients’ first visit, sagittal plane parameters such as thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and sacral slope decreased when transitioning from the standing position to the sitting position (standing 29° ± 6°, 42° ± 8°, and 42° ± 8° vs. sitting 22° ± 5°, 27° ± 6°, and 24° ± 4°; p < 0.001), whereas pelvic tilt (PT) increased and sagittal vertical axis shifted forward (standing 9° ± 6° and 1.6 ± 2.7 cm vs. sitting 24° ± 4° and 3.8 ± 2.3 cm; p < 0.001). After bracing, TK and LL decreased slightly (from 29° ± 6° and 42° ± 8° to 23° ± 3° and 38° ± 6°; p < 0.001), whereas the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) value increased (from 3° ± 3° to 11° ± 3°; p < 0.001). When transitioning to the sitting position, similar characteristics were observed during the first visit, except for a subtle increase in the TLJ and PT values (standing 11° ± 3° and 9° ± 4° vs. sitting 14° ± 3° and 28° ± 4°; p < 0.001). Moreover, the coronal and axial parameters at different positions measured at the same time showed no significant change.

Conclusions

In brace-wearing patients with thoracic scoliosis, compensatory sagittal plane straightening may be observed with a slight increase in thoracolumbar kyphosis, particularly when transitioning from the standing position to the sitting position, due to posterior rotation of the pelvis. Our results highlight that sagittal alignment in AIS with brace treatment is not completely analyzed with only standing X-Ray.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800018310).

Assessment of the axial plane deformity in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its relationship to the frontal and sagittal planes

PURPOSE

Investigate the axial plane deformity in the scoliotic segment and its relationship to the deformity in the frontal and sagittal planes.

METHODS

Two hundred subjects with AIS (Cobb ≥ 20°) underwent low dose biplanar X-rays with 3D reconstruction of the spine and pelvis. All structural curves were considered and were distributed as follows: 142 thoracic (T), 70 thoracolumbar (TL), and 47 lumbar curves (L). Common 3D spino-pelvic and scoliosis parameters were collected such as: frontal Cobb; torsion index (TI); hypokyphosis/lordosis index (HI). Parameters were compared between each type of curvature and correlations were investigated between the 3 planes.

RESULTS

Frontal Cobb was higher in all T (45 ± 19°) and TL (41 ± 15°) curves compared to L curves (35 ± 14°, p = 0.004). TI was higher in T curves when compared to TL and L curves (TI: 15 ± 8°, 9 ± 6°, 7 ± 5°, p < 0.001). HI was similar between curve types. T curves showed significant correlations between the 3 planes: Cobb vs. TI (r = 0.76), Cobb vs. HI (r = - 0.54) and HI vs. TI (r = - 0.42). The axial plane deformity was related to the frontal deformity and the type of curvature (adjusted-R² = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Beside showing the most severe deformity frontally and axially compared to TL and L curves, the T curves showed strong correlations between the 3 planes of the deformity. Moreover, this study showed that the axial plane deformity cannot be fully determined by the frontal and sagittal deformities, which highlights the importance of 3D assessment in the setting of AIS.

Curve type, flexibility, correction, and rotation are predictors of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing conservative treatment : a systematic review

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the current evidence surrounding curve type and morphology on curve progression risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted by two independent reviewers on PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science to obtain all published information on morphological predictors of AIS progression. Search items included 'adolescent idiopathic scoliosis', 'progression', and 'imaging'. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In all, 6,286 publications were identified with 3,598 being subjected to secondary scrutiny. Ultimately, 26 publications (25 datasets) were included in this review.

RESULTS

For unbraced patients, high and moderate evidence was found for Cobb angle and curve type as predictors, respectively. Initial Cobb angle > 25° and thoracic curves were predictive of curve progression. For braced patients, flexibility < 28% and limited in-brace correction were factors predictive of progression with high and moderate evidence, respectively. Thoracic curves, high apical vertebral rotation, large rib vertebra angle difference, small rib vertebra angle on the convex side, and low pelvic tilt had weak evidence as predictors of curve progression.

CONCLUSION

For curve progression, strong and consistent evidence is found for Cobb angle, curve type, flexibility, and correction rate. Cobb angle > 25° and flexibility < 28% are found to be important thresholds to guide clinical prognostication. Despite the low evidence, apical vertebral rotation, rib morphology, and pelvic tilt may be promising factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):424-432.

Supine correction index as a predictor for brace outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of morphological spinal parameters to predict the outcome of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a novel supine correction index (SCI) for guiding bracing treatment.

Methods

Patients with AIS to be treated by bracing were prospectively recruited between December 2016 and 2018, and were followed until brace removal. In all, 207 patients with a mean age at recruitment of 12.8 years (SD 1.2) were enrolled. Cobb angles, supine flexibility, and the rate of in-brace correction were measured and used to predict curve progression at the end of follow-up. The SCI was defined as the ratio between correction rate and flexibility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the optimal thresholds for flexibility, correction rate, and SCI in predicting a higher risk of progression, defined by a change in Cobb angle of ≥ 5° or the need for surgery.

Results

The baseline Cobb angles were similar (p = 0.374) in patients whose curves progressed (32.7° (SD 10.7)) and in those whose curves remained stable (31.4° (SD 6.1)). High supine flexibility (odds ratio (OR) 0.947 (95% CI 0.910 to 0.984); p = 0.006) and correction rate (OR 0.926 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.964); p < 0.001) predicted a lower incidence of progression after adjusting for Cobb angle, Risser sign, curve type, menarche status, distal radius and ulna grading, and brace compliance. ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off of 18.1% for flexibility (sensitivity 0.682, specificity 0.704) and a cut-off of 28.8% for correction rate (sensitivity 0.773, specificity 0.691) in predicting a lower risk of curve progression. A SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.251 to 0.955); sensitivity 0.583, specificity 0.591; p = 0.036).

Conclusion

A higher supine flexibility (18.1%) and correction rate (28.8%), and a SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression. These novel parameters can be used as a guide to optimize the outcome of bracing.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):495–503.