1
|
Fornaciari P, Jamei-Martel O, Vial P. Trends in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Predominant Indications and the Most Commonly Employed Implant Designs. J Clin Med 2025; 14:3186. [PMID: 40364217 PMCID: PMC12072707 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14093186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2025] [Revised: 04/20/2025] [Accepted: 05/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Over the past few decades, shoulder arthroplasty has evolved rapidly, driven by a growing demand for surgical solutions to degenerative, traumatic, and irreparable rotator cuff-related pathologies, particularly in an aging but increasingly active population. Objective: This narrative review aims to examine the main clinical indications and the most commonly used implant designs, highlighting differences in functional outcomes, complication rates, and revision rates between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Methods: Articles published between 2011 and 2025 were selected through PubMed and the Australian Joint Replacement Registry reports from 2023 and 2024. The included studies comprised randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses involving adult patients treated for primary osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Results: ATSA remains the preferred option in younger patients with an intact rotator cuff, due to superior outcomes in mobility and prosthesis longevity. However, glenoid component loosening remains a significant limitation. Initially reserved for irreparable cuff tears and complex fractures, RTSA has seen a progressive expansion of its indications, offering lower revision rates and satisfactory functional results, particularly in elderly patients. Recent prosthetic innovations include stemless implants, augmented glenoid components, and convertible platforms. Conclusions: The choice between ATSA and RTSA should be individualized, based on patient-specific factors such as age, rotator cuff integrity, functional demands, and bone quality. Advances in implant materials and design, together with improved patient selection, have significantly enhanced clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fornaciari
- Clinique de La Source, Avenue Alexandre-Vinet 30, 1004 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Omid Jamei-Martel
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Training, Research Hospital, HFR Fribourg, 1752 Fribourg, Switzerland; (O.J.-M.); (P.V.)
| | - Philippe Vial
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Training, Research Hospital, HFR Fribourg, 1752 Fribourg, Switzerland; (O.J.-M.); (P.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tagliero LE, Esper R, Sperling JW, Morrey ME, Barlow JD, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus nonunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2025; 34:828-836. [PMID: 39147268 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proximal humerus nonunion is a challenging complication of fractures that can be treated surgically with either open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The few studies published on this subject have shown high rates of complications and revision surgery when RTSA has been performed for proximal humerus nonunion. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of complications and revision of this procedure at our institution, as well as to identify any variables that may impact risks of complications and reoperations. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent RTSA for proximal humerus nonunion between 2005 and 2021 was performed. Nonunion was defined as imaging evidence of lack of union, at least 90 days after the index fracture. Patients with less than 1 year of clinical follow-up were excluded. Fifty patients were included, with the majority being female (78%). The mean age at time of RTSA was 71 (range: 54-86) years and most patients were initially treated nonoperatively (74%). Mean total follow-up was 49 (range: 11-130) months. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded. Primary outcomes were complications and reoperations. Complications were divided into surgical (those directly related to RTSA), or other (those unrelated to RTSA). Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale pain scores and range of motion. RESULTS A total of 17 shoulders (34%) sustained complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty, with 10 (20%) requiring reoperation. Six patients (12%) sustained dislocations and 5 (10%) had radiographic evidence of humeral loosening. No variables examined, including nonoperative vs. surgical management of the index fracture, prosthesis type, or management of tuberosities, influenced the risk of dislocation. Survivorship free from reoperation at 2 years was 73%. Younger age at time of RTSA and the presence of diabetes mellitus both increased the risk of reoperation significantly (P = .013 and P = .037, respectively). There was a trend towards increased risk of reoperation in patients who were treated with initial ORIF (hazard ratio = 2.95); however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = .088). Three patients (6%) sustained a periprosthetic fracture after a fall. CONCLUSION RTSA provides improved pain and function for properly selected patients with proximal humerus nonunion. Dislocation, humeral loosening, and reoperation rates remain high when RTSA is performed for nonunion compared to other diagnoses. In this study, younger age and diabetes mellitus increased the odds of reoperation. Every effort must be made to optimize implant stability and humeral component fixation when RTSA is performed for proximal humerus nonunion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Tagliero
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ronda Esper
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John W Sperling
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mark E Morrey
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan D Barlow
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
- Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henssler L, Pfeifer C, Riedl M, Schneider T, Kobeck M, Alt V, Berner A, Kerschbaum M, Klute L. Intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures does not achieve superior functional results to non-operative treatment in the long term. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:3449-3460. [PMID: 39105845 PMCID: PMC11417063 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05421-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-operative treatment (NOT) of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) has regained significance due to recent evidence. Additionally, positive outcomes of plate osteosynthesis and fracture arthroplasty prompt a reassessment of the role of intramedullary nailing (IMN). While favorable short and medium-term results have been documented following IMN, little is known regarding functional outcomes and quality of life in the long-term. METHODS Data from 180 patients with dislocated PHF of Neer types III, IV and V, treated at our level-I trauma center between 2004 and 2014 using IMN or NOT therapy, were scanned. Patients were re-evaluated after a minimum of 5 years to assess functional outcomes (age- and sex-adapted Constant Score, QuickDASH), quality of life (SF12), and complications or reoperations. RESULTS Out of the initially identified 180 patients, 51 were unavailable for follow-up (FU) and 71 had deceased during the FU period. Functional outcomes and quality of life was, therefore, assessed in 58 patients (30 IMN, 28 NOT) with an average age at injury of 68 years after a mean FU time of 10.3 ± 3.4 years. Epidemiological patient characteristics did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups (p > .05). The functional outcome assessed by age- and sex-adapted Constant Score (NOT: 74 ± 28; IMN: 68 ± 24; p = .438), QuickDASH (NOT: 25 ± 27; IMN: 31 ± 23; p = .374) or quality of life using the SF12 (p > .05) revealed no significant disparities in long-term outcomes between the treatment groups. 10 of 30 patients in the IMN group underwent surgical revision to address complications, exceeding mere implant removal. Conversely, no patient in the NOT group underwent a revision surgery during the FU period. CONCLUSIONS In the long-term, functional and quality of life-related outcomes of IMN did not diverge significantly from those of NOT, while causing a higher incidence of follow-up interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leopold Henssler
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Christian Pfeifer
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Altoetting, Vinzenz-von-Paul-Straße 10, 84503, Altoetting, Germany
| | - Moritz Riedl
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Teresa Schneider
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Miriam Kobeck
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Volker Alt
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arne Berner
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Bad Neustadt, Von-Guttenberg-Straße 11, 97616, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
| | - Maximilian Kerschbaum
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Klute
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim H, Oh T, Lee SK. Do multiple fractures affect risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fracture? A retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:121-130. [PMID: 37698623 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05039-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures is associated with quick recovery and low risk of non-union. However, fixation failure may occur in case of severe comminution fractures. Moreover, clinical outcomes may be affected when clavicle fractures occur in combination with other injuries, particularly those involving the lower extremities, as the use of crutches or walkers may hinder the process of rehabilitation by adding strain on the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, resulting in possible fixation failure. This study aims to identify risk factors for fixation failure of midshaft clavicle fractures and elucidate the role of combined fractures in treatment outcomes. METHODS This study included patients diagnosed with midshaft clavicle fractures who underwent initial surgery between January 2012 and November 2021 at a designated regional trauma center hospital. Retrospective evaluation of fixation failure was carried out in 352 patients with midshaft clavicle fractures using standard clinical evaluation protocols and conventional radiographs. The prevalence of fixation failure and the effects of several demographic variables on the risk of fixation failure and non-union were examined. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for fixation failure. RESULTS Fixation failure occurred in 40 patients (11.4%). Multivariate analysis identified comminution [odds ratio (OR) 3.532, p value = 0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-8.05)] and fewer number of screws (OR 0.223, p value = 0.022, 95% CI 0.06-0.80) as risk factors for fixation failure. Surgical techniques using wire cerclage reduced the chances of fixation failure in comminuted fractures (OR 0.63, p value = 0.033, 95% CI 0.05-0.80). Combined fractures that required rehabilitation using walkers or crutches increased the risk of non-union (OR 19.043, p value = 0.032, 95% CI 1.28-282.46). CONCLUSIONS Additional fixation of comminuted fractures using cerclage can reduce the risk of treatment failure, while multiple fractures or rehabilitation for ambulation increases the risk of the same. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyojune Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, 1306 Dunsan-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35233, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeho Oh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, 1306 Dunsan-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35233, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Ki Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, 1306 Dunsan-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35233, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Donat A, Jiang S, Xie W, Knapstein PR, Albertsen LC, Kokot JL, Sevecke J, Augustin R, Jahn D, Yorgan TA, Frosch KH, Tsitsilonis S, Baranowsky A, Keller J. The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine promotes late-stage fracture healing in mice. iScience 2023; 26:107761. [PMID: 37720081 PMCID: PMC10504537 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Impaired fracture healing is of high clinical relevance, as up to 15% of patients with long-bone fractures display non-unions. Fracture patients also include individuals treated with selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). As SNRI were previously shown to negatively affect bone homeostasis, it remained unclear whether patients with SNRI are at risk of impaired bone healing. Here, we show that daily treatment with the SNRI reboxetine reduces trabecular bone mass in the spine but increases cortical thickness and osteoblast numbers in the femoral midshaft. Most importantly, reboxetine does not impair bone regeneration in a standardized murine fracture model, and even improves callus bridging and biomechanical stability at late healing stages. In sum, reboxetine affects bone remodeling in a site-specific manner. Treatment does not interfere with the early and intermediate stages of bone regeneration and improves healing outcomes of the late-stage fracture callus in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Donat
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shan Jiang
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Weixin Xie
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paul Richard Knapstein
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lilly-Charlotte Albertsen
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Judith Luisa Kokot
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Sevecke
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ruben Augustin
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Denise Jahn
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Timur Alexander Yorgan
- Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Frosch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, 21033 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Serafeim Tsitsilonis
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Baranowsky
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Keller
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maier SP, Prabhat AM, Collins JE, von Keudell A, Earp B, Zhang D. Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023; 7:01979360-202310000-00013. [PMID: 37867245 PMCID: PMC10593265 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-23-00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is used to treat a variety of shoulder-related pathologies. This study compared medium-term clinical outcomes of less than 10-year follow-up in patients treated with RSA for proximal humerus fracture (PHF) versus rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA). METHODS This retrospective review was conducted at two tertiary care centers, in which self-reported clinical outcomes were assessed using four validated instruments, that is, American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), visual analog scale (VAS), and shoulder subjective value (SSV). Statistical analyses were performed using linear or logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Of the 189 patients included in this study, 70 were treated for fracture and 119 for RCA. At a mean postoperative follow-up of 6.4 years, the means were 79.7 for ASES score, 20.8 for SPADI-Total, 0.8 for VAS, and 77.1 for SSV. After adjusting models for covariates, there was no significant difference in average SSV (P = 0.7), VAS (P = 0.7) or SPADI-Pain (P = 0.2) between PHF and RCA cohorts; however, the RCA cohort reported significantly better outcomes in ASES scores (P = 0.002), SPADI-Disability (P < 0.0001), and SPADI-Total (P = 0.0001). DISCUSSION Patients with RCA and PHF treated with RSA achieved similar medium-term outcomes in several domains, particularly postoperative pain levels; however, patients with PHF reported greater perceived disability. RSA is an effective pain-controlling procedure, but patients may have variable functional outcomes based on the indication for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Maier
- From the Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA (Dr. Maier II); the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Ms. Prabhat); the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Collins); the Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Bispebjerghospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Dr. von Keudell); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. von Keudell, Dr. Earp, and Dr. Zhang)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cosic F, Kirzner N, Edwards E, Page R, Kimmel L, Gabbe B. The Translated Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Comparison of Operative and Nonoperative Management. J Orthop Trauma 2023; 37:e341-e348. [PMID: 37053113 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report on the long-term outcomes of the management of translated proximal humerus fractures. DESIGN A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to December 2018. SETTING Academic Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS/PATIENTS A total of 108 patients with a proximal humerus fracture with ≥100% translation, defined as no cortical bony contact between the shaft and humeral head fragments, were included. INTERVENTION Patients were managed nonoperatively with sling immobilization or with operative management as determined by the treating surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score, EQ-5D-5L, return to work, and radiological outcomes. Complications recorded included further surgery, loss of position/fixation, nonunion/malunion, and avascular necrosis. RESULTS Of the 108 patients, 76 underwent operative intervention and 32 were managed nonoperatively. The mean (SD) age in the operative group was 54.3 (±20.2) years and in the nonoperative group was 73.3 (±15.3) years ( P < 0.001). There was no association between Oxford Shoulder Score and management options (mean 38.5 [±9.5] operative versus mean 41.3 [±8.5] nonoperative, P = 0.48). Operative management was associated with improved health status outcomes; EQ-5D utility score adjusted mean difference was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.04-0.27; P = 0.008); EQ-5D VAS adjusted mean difference was 19.2 (95% CI, 5.2-33.2; P = 0.008). Operative management was associated with a lower odds of nonunion (adjusted OR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P = 0.04), malunion (adjusted OR 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.51; P = 0.003), and complications (adjusted OR 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.32; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Translated proximal humerus fractures with ≥100% displacement demonstrate improved health status and radiological outcomes after surgical fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Cosic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Kirzner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elton Edwards
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Page
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia
- Barwon Centre for Orthopaedic Research and Education (B-CORE), St John of God Hospital and Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lara Kimmel
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia; and
| | - Belinda Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barreto Rocha DF, Vogel M, Delma SR, Baylor JL, Horwitz DS, Grandizio LC. The Utility of Routine Follow-up Radiographs in the Nonoperative Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients 65 Years and Older. Orthopedics 2023; 46:e244-e248. [PMID: 36719409 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20230125-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Whereas prior studies have aimed to define the utility of routine radiographs for the closed treatment of upper extremity fractures, it remains uncertain whether routine radiographs influence management decisions for nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). The purpose of this investigation was to assess the utility of routine radiographic monitoring of closed PHFs in elderly patients initially indicated for nonoperative treatment. We identified all patients 65 years and older who had a PHF from 2016 to 2019. We excluded cases of pathologic fractures or peri-prosthetic fractures, nonunion, malunion, cases with insufficient follow-up, and cases for which surgery was indicated either in the emergency department or at the first orthopedic visit. After applying these exclusion criteria, 402 cases remained. We recorded baseline demographics and fracture descriptions and noted any conversion to operative treatment after the initial office visit. Two-part fractures were most common (56%). Of the 402 fractures indicated for nonoperative treatment, 21 (5%) were converted to operative management during the follow-up period. Nine fractures (2%) were converted to operative management within 30 days of the first office visit. Eight cases (2%) were converted to operative treatment more than 120 days after the initial office visit: 6 due to nonunion and 2 due to posttraumatic arthritis. For patients 65 years and older who undergo initial nonoperative treatment of a PHF, routine follow-up radiographs do not appear to alter management decisions. Given the risk and cost associated with routine radiographs, surgeons should consider forgoing these images in the absence of clinical concern. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(4):e244-e248.].
Collapse
|
9
|
Lukas J, Menduri H, Christian S, Bernhard J, Matthijs J. Impact of aberrant beam paths on antero-posterior shoulder radiographs in proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023:10.1007/s00402-023-04901-2. [PMID: 37169933 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04901-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accurate radiographic assessment of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is important as it influences clinical decision-making and predicts clinical outcome. Since aberrant radiographic views might influence the assessment of fracture displacement, it was the goal of this study to investigate the impact of aberrant beam paths on radiographic assessment of PHF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten consecutive patients with a displaced PHF, bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan, and a true clinical AP radiograph were included. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were generated and aberrant beam paths were simulated by rotation of ± 30° around the horizontal (flexion and extension) and vertical axis (internal and external rotation) by increments of 10°. Measurement of the neck-shaft-angle (NSA) and eccentric head index (EHI) addressed humeral angulation and offset, respectively. Paired comparisons determined the influence of aberrant beam paths on both measurements between incremental altered views, and between clinical and digital true AP views. Descriptive statistics assessed the change in Neer classification and recommended treatment. RESULTS True AP DRRs approximated the clinical true AP view by a mean difference of 2° for NSA, and a mean difference of 0.12 for EHI. NSA in injured shoulders was most susceptible to malrotation around the vertical axis (p < 0.03), with largest differences seen for internal rotation. Aberrant projections in extension had no influence on NSA (p > 0.70), whereas flexion of ≥ 20° and 30° demonstrated differences in injured and uninjured shoulders, respectively (p < 0.05). EHI was only influenced by malrotation in internal rotation in uninjured shoulders (p < 0.03). Alterations in Neer type occurred at 30° of malrotation in 5 cases, with a change in recommended treatment in 2. CONCLUSIONS Humeral angulation and offset measurements on AP radiographs are more susceptible to aberrant beam paths in fractured humeri. Altered radiographic beam paths around the vertical axis showed the most substantial influence on the assessment of PHF, with angular measurements demonstrating larger differences then offset measurements. Beam path alterations of 30° can influence the Neer classification, and might influence fracture displacement-based decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jud Lukas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hoessly Menduri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Spross Christian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jost Bernhard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jacxsens Matthijs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saul D, Menger MM, Ehnert S, Nüssler AK, Histing T, Laschke MW. Bone Healing Gone Wrong: Pathological Fracture Healing and Non-Unions-Overview of Basic and Clinical Aspects and Systematic Review of Risk Factors. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:85. [PMID: 36671657 PMCID: PMC9855128 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10010085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone healing is a multifarious process involving mesenchymal stem cells, osteoprogenitor cells, macrophages, osteoblasts and -clasts, and chondrocytes to restore the osseous tissue. Particularly in long bones including the tibia, clavicle, humerus and femur, this process fails in 2-10% of all fractures, with devastating effects for the patient and the healthcare system. Underlying reasons for this failure are manifold, from lack of biomechanical stability to impaired biological host conditions and wound-immanent intricacies. In this review, we describe the cellular components involved in impaired bone healing and how they interfere with the delicately orchestrated processes of bone repair and formation. We subsequently outline and weigh the risk factors for the development of non-unions that have been established in the literature. Therapeutic prospects are illustrated and put into clinical perspective, before the applicability of biomarkers is finally discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Saul
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Kogod Center on Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian M. Menger
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ehnert
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas K. Nüssler
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tina Histing
- Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Laschke
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Surgery, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim HM, Ricchetti ET, Hsu JE. What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1778-1784. [PMID: 35926178 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Eric T Ricchetti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jason E Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goudie EB, MacDonald DJ, Robinson CM. Functional Outcome After Nonoperative Treatment of a Proximal Humeral Fracture in Adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:123-138. [PMID: 34878423 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.02018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The functional outcome following nonoperative treatment of a proximal humeral fracture and the factors that influence it are poorly defined. We aimed to prospectively assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a patient cohort at 1 year after the injury. METHODS In this study, 774 adult patients sustaining a proximal humeral fracture completed PROM assessments, including the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments of pain, health, and overall treatment satisfaction at 1 year. The mean patient age was 65.6 years, and 73.8% of patients were female. The influences of demographic and fracture measurements and complications on the OSS and EQ-5D-3L were assessed. RESULTS The 1-year mean scores were 33.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.1 to 34.2 points) for the OSS and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.61) for the EQ-5D-3L. There was considerable heterogeneity in the reported scores, and the 3 demographic variables of higher levels of dependency, higher levels of social deprivation, and a history of affective (mood) disorder were most consistently associated with poorer outcomes, accounting for between 37% and 43% of the score variation. The initial fracture translation potentially leading to nonunion accounted for 9% to 15% of the variation, and a displaced tuberosity fracture was also predictive of 1% to 4% of the outcome variation. There was evidence of a ceiling effect for the OSS, with 238 patients (30.8%) having a score of ≥47 points but a mean outcome satisfaction of only 72.9 points, and this effect was more pronounced in younger, active individuals. At the other end of the spectrum, 239 patients (30.9%) reported an OSS of ≤24 points, and 120 patients (15.5%) had a "worse-than-death" EQ-5D-3L score. CONCLUSIONS Nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures produces considerable variation in shoulder-specific and general health outcomes at 1 year, and a substantial proportion of patients have poor perceived functional outcomes. The outcome for the majority of less-displaced fractures is mainly influenced by preexisting patient-related psychosocial factors, although the fracture-related factors of displacement, nonunion, and tuberosity displacement account for a small but measurable proportion of the variation and the poorer outcomes in the minority with more severe injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewan B Goudie
- The Edinburgh Shoulder Clinic, New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou W, Lin Z, Xiong Y, Xue H, Song W, Yu T, Chen L, Hu Y, Panayi AC, Sun Y, Cao F, Liu G, Hu L, Yan C, Xie X, Qiu W, Mi B, Liu G. Dual-Targeted Nanoplatform Regulating the Bone Immune Microenvironment Enhances Fracture Healing. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2021; 13:56944-56960. [PMID: 34797653 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c17420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The immune system and skeletal system are closely linked. Macrophages are one of the most important immune cells for bone remodeling, playing a prohealing role mainly through M2 phenotype polarization. Baicalein (5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone, BCL) has been well documented to have a noticeable promotion effect on M2 macrophage polarization. However, due to the limitations in targeted delivery to macrophages and the toxic effect on other organs, BCL has rarely been used in the treatment of bone fractures. In this study, we developed mesoporous silica and Fe3O4 composite-targeted nanoparticles loaded with BCL (BCL@MMSNPs-SS-CD-NW), which could be magnetically delivered to the fracture site. This induced macrophage recruitment in a targeted manner, polarizing them toward the M2 phenotype, which was demonstrated to induce mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) toward osteoblastic differentiation. The mesoporous silicon nanoparticles (MSNs) were prepared with surface sulfhydrylation and amination modification, and the mesoporous channels were blocked with β-cyclodextrin. The outer layer of the mesoporous silicon was added with an amantane-modified NW-targeting peptide to obtain the targeted nanosystem. After entering macrophages, BCL could be released from nanoparticles since the disulfide linker could be cleaved by intracellular glutathione (GSH), resulting in the removal of cyclodextrin (CD) gatekeeper, which is a key element in the pro-bone-remodeling functions such as anti-inflammation and induction of M2 macrophage polarization to facilitate osteogenic differentiation. This nanosystem passively accumulated in the fracture site, promoting osteogenic differentiation activities, highlighting a potent therapeutic benefit with high biosafety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Ze Lin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yuan Xiong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Hang Xue
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Wen Song
- Institute of Biology and Medicine, College of Life Science and Health, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China
| | - Tao Yu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
| | - Lang Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yiqiang Hu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Adriana C Panayi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02152, United States
| | - Yun Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Faqi Cao
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Guodong Liu
- Medical Center of Trauma and War Injuries, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Liangcong Hu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Chenchen Yan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Xudong Xie
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Wenxiu Qiu
- Institute of Biology and Medicine, College of Life Science and Health, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China
| | - Bobin Mi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Guohui Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration, Wuhan 430022, China
| |
Collapse
|