Angular-stable locked intramedullary nailing of two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A multicenter retrospective observational study

Angular stable intramedullary nail versus locking plate fixation of osteoporotic surgical neck proximal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison

Background

Our study's purpose was to compare biomechanical performances of a proximal humerus locking plate (PHLP) with an antegrade intramedullary nail (IMN) in an osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.

Methods

Simulated fractures were made through the surgical neck of synthetic osteoporotic humeri. One group had identical transverse fractures instrumented with a PHLP with seven screws (PHLP-7; n = 4), a PHLP with nine screws (PHLP-9; n = 2), or an IMN (n = 4). Each underwent pre-fatigue testing, an identical fatigue protocol, and post-fatigue testing. A second high oblique fracture line was tested identically with PHLP-9 (n = 4) and IMN (n = 4) constructs.

Results

Statistical analyses of transverse specimen pre-fatigue stiffness revealed that the PHLP-7 and PHLP-9 were stiffer in anteroposterior bending and torsion compared to the IMN. There was no difference between the three constructs in varus-valgus bending or compression. Post-fatigue stiffness comparisons revealed no difference between the three constructs. For the oblique fracture, pre-fatigue differences were found with the IMN stiffer in varus-valgus bending and the PHLP-9 stiffer in torsion.

Discussion

The biomechanical performance of an angular-stable proximal humeral nail design was comparable, especially following fatigue, to locked plate/screw constructs in a synthetic osteoporotic two-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model.

Complications following intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to systematically review complications arising from intramedullary nailing (IMN) of proximal and humeral shaft fractures. This study hypothesized that there would be a low rate of complications and revision among patients treated with IMN for humerus fractures.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a literature search in the PubMed database based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on outcomes following the use of intramedullary nails for proximal humerus fractures or humeral shaft fractures. Variables that were collected included complications, visual analog scale pain scores and revision operations.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 7984 shoulders. The average age of patients in this study was 55.2 years and 60.7% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 16.6 months. The overall complication rate for all fractures treated with intramedullary nails was 18.9%, and the overall revision rate was 6.8%. Among the complications were fracture complications (7.5%), hardware complications (7.2%), soft tissue complications (1.8%), neurovascular complications (1.6%), and infection (0.8%). Four-part proximal humerus fractures (52.9%) and open fractures (36.7%) had the highest rates of complication. Among the reasons for revision were hardware removal or replacement (5.0%), conversion to arthroplasty (0.6%), and other (1.2%). The mean visual analog scale pain score at last follow-up was 1.6.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there was a moderate rate of complications but low rate of revision following IMN of humerus fractures. Open fractures and 4-part proximal humerus fractures had the highest complication rates.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications in 2-part vs. 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated using an intramedullary nail designed to capture the tuberosities

Background

Intramedullary nail fixation for proximal humerus fractures has been shown to provide satisfactory results. The quality of reduction correlates with clinical outcomes, the rate of complications, avascular necrosis, and postoperative loss of fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of 2-part proximal humerus fractures compared to 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures.

Methods

A single-center retrospective review was carried out of patients who underwent an intramedullary nail for a proximal humerus fracture by one of three surgeons between the years of 2009 and 2022, and who had a minimum of 12-months follow-up. Fracture pattern, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, satisfaction, pain score, range of motion, and complications were recorded. The mechanism of injury (high energy vs. low energy), method of reduction (open vs. percutaneous), and evidence of radiographic healing were assessed. A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The study included 78 patients (62 female, 16 male). The number of patients in each group (2-part, N = 32 vs. 3- or 4-part, N = 46), mean age (2-part, 64 vs. 3- or 4-part,61), follow-up (2-part, 42.5 months vs. 3- or 4-part, 34.5 months), injury type (2-part, 88% low energy vs. 3- or 4-part, 78% low energy), and method of reduction (2-part, 81% percutaneous vs. 3- or 4-part 72% percutaneous) were similar among the two groups. There was fracture union in all patients. All patients demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcome measures. However, 2-part fractures did have a significantly lower pain score, higher Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and higher percentage of patients being satisfied or very satisfied when compared to 3- or 4-part fractures. The rate of subsequent procedures was 13% (n = 4) in 2-part fractures compared to 19% (n = 9) in 3- or 4-part fractures but was not statistically significant (P = .414). The overall rate of conversion to arthroplasty was 3.2% in 2-part fractures and 10.4% in 3- or 4-part fractures.

Conclusion

Multipart proximal humerus fractures remain difficult to treat. However, this study demonstrates an overall acceptable outcome with improvement in range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, and similar complication rates between 2-part and 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated with an intramedullary nail. However, the improvement in certain parameters is not as marked in 3- or 4-part fractures as 2-part fractures.

Intramedullary Nailing Technique for Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Straight Antegrade Nail with Locking Tuberosity Fixation

Background

Intramedullary straight nail fixation of proximal humeral fractures using a locking mechanism provides advantages compared with plating, including (1) less soft-tissue dissection, which preserves periosteal blood supply and soft-tissue attachments; (2) improved construct stability for comminuted fractures or osteopenic bone; and (3) shorter operative time for simpler fractures.

Description

The patient is placed in the beach-chair position with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45°. The fracture is reduced with use of closed or percutaneous methods, ideally, or with an open approach if required. Temporary fragment fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires can be utilized. A 1-cm incision is made just anterior to the acromioclavicular joint, overlying the zenith of the humeral head and in line with the diaphysis. A guide-pin is then placed through this incision and is verified to be centrally located and in line with the humeral diaphysis on fluoroscopic views. The guide-pin is advanced into the diaphysis. A cannulated 9-mm reamer is inserted over the guide-pin to create a starting position. The nail is then inserted, with adequate fragment reduction maintained until the proximal nail portion is buried under the subchondral humeral head. The proximal screw trajectory and alignment are checked fluoroscopically. The proximal locking screws are pre-drilled and inserted first using percutaneous drill sleeves through the radiolucent targeting jig. The screw is inserted through the guide and is advanced into the nail until appropriately seated. This process is then repeated for the other proximal screws as necessary. Finally, the distal diaphyseal screws are pre-drilled and inserted in a similar percutaneous fashion using the jig, and the jig is removed. Final orthogonal images are obtained. Copious irrigation of the incisions is performed and they are closed and dressed with a sterile dressing. The operative arm is placed in an abduction sling.

Alternatives

Alternative treatment options for proximal humeral fractures include nonoperative treatment with use of a sling, percutaneous reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires, open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate and screw construct, hemiarthroplasty, and anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty1.

Rationale

The presently described technique for proximal humeral fracture fixation using a straight, antegrade, locking nail allows for minimal soft-tissue disruption, preserving vascularity and soft-tissue support and achieving angularly stable fixation in often osteopenic bone. The superior and in-line entry point avoids complications of rotator cuff injury and/or subacromial impingement. The proximal locking screws avoid complications of screw penetration or migration. This technique is appropriate for surgically indicated Neer 2-, 3-, and 4-part humeral fractures, including in elderly patients, when the humeral head fragment remains viable1-5.

Expected Outcomes

Based on available Level-III and IV evidence using this technique, patients should expect recovered motion and the ability to perform daily activities independently, with a mean active elevation of 132° to 136°1,4,6, external rotation of 37° to 52°1,4,6, and internal rotation to L31. Pain scores improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively, with a mean pain score of 1.4 on the visual analogue scale3,4,6. Patient-reported outcomes were good to excellent, with Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores of 80% to 81%1,6, mean Constant scores from 71 to 811,3,4,6, and high rates of patient satisfaction (97% satisfied or very satisfied)4. Studies also demonstrated good to excellent fracture healing, with no tuberosity migration and low rates of nonunion (0% to 5%)1,6 and humeral head necrosis (0% to 4%)1,4. Revision rates ranged from 10.5% to 16.7%4,6.

Important Tips

The starting position of the guide-pin must be central and at the zenith of the humeral head on the anteroposterior Grashey and the scapular Y views, and the guide-pin must be aligned with the diaphysis prior to advancing it.Failure to bluntly dissect the percutaneous incisions risks injury to the axillary nerve.Verify correct version of the nail prior to drilling any screws, to avoid incorrect version and potential loss of functional rotation.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

ABD = abductionAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyER = external rotationFF = forward flexion (forward elevation)IR = internal rotationSANE = Single Assessment Numerical EvaluationSSV = Subjective Shoulder ValueVAS = Visual Analogue Scale.

Straight antegrade humeral nailing and risk of iatrogenic injury of supraspinatus tendon footprint: An MRI study

Background

Straight antegrade humeral nailing (SAHN) is associated with excellent clinical results in proximal humerus fractures. The optimal entry point is the top of the humeral head. However, the anatomy is variable, and the entry point can affect supraspinatus tendon footprint (SSP-F) or fracture reduction. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the SSP-F and SAHN entry point by analyzing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the humerus.

Methods

In total 58 MRI studies of entire humerus were reviewed. The mean age was 51.6 ± 12.4 years, with 40 female patients. The distance between the SSP-F and the SAHN insertion point (critical distance: CD), the width of the footprint, and the neck-shaft angle (NSA) were measured. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed.

Results

The mean CD was 7.51 mm ± 2.81 (0-12.9 mm) with 51.7% of proximal humerus "critical type" (CD <8 mm). The CD was found to be lower in females, with no difference found with varying age (62.5% "critical type"). CD correlated with NSA (linear regression). "Critical type" correlated with female gender and NSA (logistic regression).

Discussion

More than half of the humerus are "critical types" as to SAHN and may, therefore, be at risk for procedure-related complications.

Intramedullary Nail for Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Credible Fixation in Comminuted Calcar

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of the medial support is especially important for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of intramedullary nail fixation with a special focus on the presence of calcar comminution.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures that were treated by intramedullary nail between January 2018 and July 2021, fracture morphology and the calcar integrity were noted on preoperative radiographs. Patients were divided into two groups according to calcar integrity. During follow-up, radiological assessment and functional outcome, including the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI), neck shaft angle (NSA), visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, active and passive range of motion, were performed. A Student t-test and univariate logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients (54 female, 29 male) had complete follow-up (average, 12.8 months; range, 10 to 33 months) and functional assessment in our study. The average age was 58.6 years (range, 20 to 89 years). The mean loss of NSA was 4° (range, 0°-12°) and no significant difference was found between two groups (p = 0.27). DTI had an average of 1.50 ± 0.19 (range 1.13-2.04). Patients with intact calcar achieved greater range of forward elevation (129.06 ± 11.91 vs. 121.05 ± 11.97, p = 0.01), and higher SST scores (8.61 ± 1.85 vs. 7.37 ± 2.22, p = 0.02). Two groups showed similar outcomes in VAS, ASES score, and range of abduction. One patient demonstrated a proximal interlocking screw cutting through and osteonecrosis of the humeral head, who underwent a second surgery for screw removal. There were no cases of infection, malunion, nonunion, nerve injury, subacromial impingement, or rotator cuff tear during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nail can favorably be used to manage proximal humeral fractures with good early radiographic and functional outcomes, even for those with comminuted calcar.

Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery at our institution from June 2012 to June 2017. Perioperative indicators, postoperative morphological parameters of the proximal humerus, and Constant-Murley scores were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in this study. Overall, 35 patients underwent open reduction and plate screw internal fixation, and 33 patients underwent limited open reduction and locking of the proximal humerus with intramedullary nail internal fixation. The total cohort had a mean follow-up duration of 17.8 months. The mean operation time of the locking plate group was significantly longer than that of the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05), while the mean bleeding volume was significantly higher in the locking plate group than that in the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05). The initial neck-shaft angles, final neck-shaft angles, forward flexion ranges, or Constant-Murley scores did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications, including screw penetrations, acromion impingement syndrome, infection, and aseptic necrosis of the humeral head, occurred in 8 patients (8/35, 22.8%) in the locking plate group and 5 patients in the intramedullary nail group (5/33, 15.1%; including malunion and acromion impingement syndrome), with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar satisfactory functional results can be achieved with locking plates and intramedullary nailing for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures, with no significant difference in the number of complications between these two techniques. However, intramedullary nailing has advantages over locking plates for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures in terms of operation time and bleeding volume.

Comparison of the ALPS and PHILOS plating systems in proximal humeral fracture fixation - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis are considered as a successful technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture (PHF) despite high complication rates. The objective of our study was to review the clinical outcome and complications of the Anatomic Locking Plate System (ALPS) and compare it to the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS). Our hypothesis was that ranges of motion (ROM) were superior and complication rates were lower with ALPS.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated with ALPS for PHF were retrospectively compared to 27 patients treated with PHILOS. Union, ROM and complications were clinically and radiologically assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18-24 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52 ± 14 in the ALPS group and 58 ± 13 in the PHILOS group. Last follow-ups were conducted at a mean of 20.6 ± 4.8 months. Mean shoulder abduction was superior with ALPS by 14° (p-value = 0.036), 15° (p-value = 0.049), and 15° (p-value = 0.049) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Mean shoulder external rotation was superior with ALPS by 11° (p-value = 0.032), 15° (p-value = 0.010) and 12° (p-value = 0.016) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months respectively. At the end of the follow-up, ROM remained better with ALPS, but not significantly. Complication rates over 21 months reached 20% with ALPS and 48% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.045). Implant removal rates reached 10% with ALPS and 37% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.036). Avascular necrosis was the only cause for hardware removal in the ALPS group.

CONCLUSION

The ALPS group showed better clinical outcomes with faster recovery in abduction and external rotation, although no difference in ROM remained after 21 months. Additionally, the complications rate was lower at last follow up. In our experience, the ALPS plating system is an effective management option in some PHF.

Percutaneous Intramedullary Nailing of Complex Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Humeral diaphyseal fractures have been traditionally stabilized with plates and screws. However, surgical morbidity can be quite extensive, particularly in more complex segmental and comminuted fracture patterns. An intramedullary nail (IMN) has the biomechanical advantage of being a load-sharing device and can be placed with a more minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of complex humeral shaft fractures treated with an IMN utilizing a percutaneous surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent treatment of a complex humeral shaft fracture with an IMN placed with a percutaneous technique. Clinical outcome scores and radiographic analysis were performed at a minimum one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 14 patients included, 12 had clinical and radiographic follow-ups at one year. The majority (64%) were obese and involved polytrauma (50%), and 79% were AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type C fractures. Union after the index procedure was 93%, with one nonunion requiring a secondary operation. The average operative time was 103 minutes. There were no other complications or additional procedures. The mean clinical outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES): 78.2, Constant Score: 72.1, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE): 81.9, and Penn Shoulder Score: 82.7.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates complex comminuted and segmental humeral shaft fractures in a higher-risk patient population can be effectively managed with IMN. Percutaneous placement of an IMN should be considered as a treatment option in complex humeral shaft fractures, particularly in patients with secondary comorbidities such as obesity and polytrauma.

Comparison of surgical efficacy of locking plates and interlocking intramedullary nails in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of locking plates versus interlocking intramedullary nails in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures to provide clinical data support and theoretical guidance.

Methods

Patients with proximal humerus fracture from the Third hospital of Shijiazhuang city and Third hospital of Hebei medical university and from January 2017 to June 2019 were selected, included and divided into the locking plate group and the interlocking intramedullary nail group according to the intervention received. Information pertaining to the perioperative period (operation time, hospital stay, blood loss, etc.) of patients in both groups was collected. VAS pain scores, shoulder activity Constant-Murley scores and postoperative complications were documented. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 64 patients were enrolled, including 36 patients in the locking plate group, with a mean age of 61.3 ± 13.9 years, while the mean age of the interlocking intramedullary nail group was 65.6 ± 11.2 years. There was no statistical difference in gender, affected side, injury mechanism and Neer classification between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the average operation time of the locking plate group was shorter than that of the interlocking nail group (84.9 ± 11.7 vs. 102.6 ± 22.1 min, P = 0.00), and the intraoperative blood loss of the locking plate group (137.4 ± 16.8 ml) was higher than that of the interlocking nail group (72.5 ± 10.5 ml, P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in the VAS score and Constant-Murley score between these two groups at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

Interlocking intramedullary nails are more minimally invasive than locking plates, but fracture reduction and fixation take longer. There was no significant difference in pain and shoulder function scores between the two internal fixation strategies for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture.

MutiLoc Nail Versus Philos Plate in Treating Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Study Among the Alderly

Background

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) account for 4–5% of all fractures in the elderly. There is still a controversy among the treatments in the displaced PHFs. Our aim was to explore the clinical outcome of PHFs with the treatment of MultiLoc nail or Philos plate in the elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 82 sustained elderly patients with PHFs were finally recruited between Dec 2016 and Dec 2017. 34 patients were treated with MultiLoc nail and 48 patients were treated with Philos plate. The demographics, fracture types, blood loss, operation time, union time, postoperative complications, visual analog scores (VASs), Constant scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Scores (ASESs), and neck-shaft-angle (NSA) between the two groups were compared.

Results

No differences were observed in the demographics, fracture types, VAS, Constant scores, and ASES scores between the two groups at final follow-up. Compared with the plate group, the blood loss, operation time, and union time were significantly lower in the nail group (all P < .05). The rate of general complications was 54.17% in the plate group, which was higher than that in the nail group (26.47%, P = .01). Three patients experienced reoperation in the plate group (3/48; 6.25%), but none in the nail group. Although there were no significant differences in intraoperative NSA between the two groups, the NSA at final follow-up in the nail group was much higher than the plate group (137.55 ± 5.53°vs 134.47 ± 5.92°, P = .02).

Conclusions

Multiloc intramedullary nail showed the similar effectiveness of final VAS, final Constant scores, and ASES scores in PHFs treatment with Philos plate. However, MultiLoc nail is superior to Philos plate in blood loss, operation time, complications, reoperation rate, and the change of NSA.

Differences in soft tissue damage using a percutaneous versus open approach for antegrade straight humeral nailing: a quantitative and qualitative anatomical study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous insertion of third-generation straight humeral nails is a recent alternative to the conventional open method. Rather than splitting, retracting and subsequently repairing the supraspinatus fibers to visualize the humeral head entry site, the percutaneous approach utilizes a cannulated awl to enter the intramedullary canal through the supraspinatus fibers without visualizing internal shoulder structures. Despite recent evidence demonstrating satisfactory outcomes in the percutaneous method, the potential for iatrogenic injury to the rotator cuff and other shoulder structures is not fully understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an anatomical study of 46 shoulders in 23 cadavers to compare damage caused to internal shoulder structures between the open and percutaneous techniques. Dimensions and morphologies of supraspinatus and humeral head perforations were recorded.

RESULTS

The percutaneous technique produced greater latitudinal tearing (p = 0.002) and less longitudinal tearing (p < 0.001) of muscle fibers, however there was no difference in supraspinatus hole area (p = 0.748). The long head biceps tendon was within 3 mm of the bone entry hole in 13 (28%) shoulders, with one shoulder in the open group exhibiting full tendon transection.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous insertion of intramedullary nails using a cannulated awl appears to produce similar soft tissue and bone entry site morphology as compared to the conventional open technique. The percutaneous method was associated with slightly greater latitudinal tearing, however the effects of this remain to be clarified through clinical studies. External rotation should be avoided during instrumentation to reduce the risk of biceps tendon transection.

Medial cortical positive support: A key factor for the postoperative stability of proximal humerus fractures

Treatments for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) often fail to achieve anatomical reduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of positive medial cortical support (PMCS) in the nonanatomical reduction of PHFs.A retrospective analysis was performed of 78 patients with PHFs who underwent surgery from August 2014 to September 2017 and whose treatments did not achieve anatomical reduction. Based on the results of standard AP radiographs of the shoulders 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the patients were divided into PMCS or negative medial cortical support (NMCS) groups. The postsurgical change in head-shaft angle (HSA) between the 2 groups was compared. Shoulder joint function and visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the 2 groups were also compared at the same time.Of the 78 patients analyzed, 37 were in the PMCS group and, 41 in the NMCS group. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the characteristics of the 2 groups (P > .05), or in postsurgical HSA. However, the HSA of the 2 groups had become significantly different (P < .05) 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery. The changes in HSA of the 2 groups were different at various time points (P < .05). One year after surgery, the shoulder function score of the PMCS group was significantly better than that of the NMCS group, as was the VAS score (both P < .05).Patients whose surgery for PHF does not achieve anatomical reduction during surgery can undergo PMCS to achieve improved results, postoperatively. NMCS should be avoided as far as possible.

PHILOS Plate Plus Oblique Insertion of Autologous Fibula for 2-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures With Medial Column Disruption: A Retrospective Study

Introduction:

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of older patients with 2-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with medial column disruption stabilized using a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure.

Materials and Methods:

Data involving 112 patients (112 shoulders) sustaining 2-part PHFs with medial column disruption treated with PHILOS plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure during 2012-2019 were identified. The median follow-up was 36 months (range: 11.2-43.5 months). The primary endpoint was the Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. The secondary endpoint was the main orthopedic complication rate.

Results:

The median Constant and ASES scores were 78 (range, 52-95) and 77 (range, 62-96) at the final follow-up, respectively. The main orthopedic complication rate was 10.7% (12/112). Twelve orthopedic complications in 8 patients were detected, and they involved loss of reduction, varus collapse, aseptic loosening, mal-union, revision, and intolerable shoulder pain. Of these complications, 3 (2.6%) involved loss of reduction, 2 (1.7%) involved varus collapse, 3 (2.6%) involved aseptic loosening, 1 (0.8%) involved mal-union, 2 (1.7%) required revision surgery, and 1 (0.8%) presented intolerable shoulder pain.

Conclusion:

PHILOS plate plus oblique insertion of autologous fibula as a primary procedure may yield good functional outcomes and a low rate of the main orthopedic complications.

Anatomic evaluation of radiographic landmarks for accurate straight antegrade intramedullary nail placement in the humerus

Background

Neurovascular insult, nonunion, and iatrogenic rotator cuff injury are concerns when using an intramedullary nail (IMN) for proximal humerus fracture. The purpose of this study was to identify a reproducible starting point and intraoperative imaging for nail insertion optimizing nail depth, tuberosity screw position, and protecting the axillary nerve and rotator cuff insertion. Our hypothesis was that a more medialized starting point would protect soft tissue structures and improve locking screw positioning.

Methods

Ten fresh-frozen cadavers underwent antegrade IMN with Grashey and modified lateral “precipice” view imaging. A guidewire was positioned medial to the coracoacromial ligament (CAL) in 5 cadavers and lateral to the CAL in 5. Distances from the nail entry point to anatomic landmarks were measured. Anatomic and histologic evaluations were performed, characterizing the nail perforation zone. Radiographs were compared between groups.

Results

The medial CAL group had a greater distance of screw fixation to the axillary nerve, a shorter distance of greater tuberosity (GT) screw fixation at the rotator cuff insertion on the infraspinatus and teres minor tubercles, and greater screw spread with improved lesser tuberosity capture. Two laterally placed implants violated the rotator cuff tendon. Imaging demonstrated that the ideal starting pin position was medial to the articular margin at a distance equal to the width of the rotator cuff insertion footprint.

Conclusions

Medial placement optimized fixation of the GT, avoided violation of the rotator cuff tendon and footprint, and was associated with an increased distance of proximal locking screw to the axillary nerve.

Three-dimensional models increase the interobserver agreement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures

Background

The agreement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures is low. Interpretation of exams used for diagnosis can be directly associated with this limitation. This study proposes to compare the agreement between experts and residents in orthopedics for treatment indication of proximal humerus fractures, utilizing 3D-models, holography (augmented reality), x-rays, and tomography as diagnostic methods.

Methods

Twenty orthopedists (ten experts in shoulder and elbow surgery and ten experts in traumatology) and thirty resident physicians in orthopedics evaluated nine fractures of the proximal humerus, randomly distributed as x-rays, tomography, 3D-models and holography, using the Neer and AO / OTA Classifications. After, we evaluated the interobserver agreement between treatment options (conservative, osteosynthesis and arthroplasty) and whether the experience of the evaluators interfered with the results.

Results

The interobserver agreement analysis showed the following kappa-values: κ = 0.362 and κ = 0.306 for experts and residents (3D-models); κ = 0.240 and κ = 0.221 (X-ray); κ = 0.233 and κ = 0.123 (Tomography) and κ = 0.321 and κ = 0.160 (Holography), for experts and residents respectively. Moreover, residents and specialists were discordant in the treatment indication using Tomography as a diagnostic method (p = 0.003). The same was not seen for the other diagnostic methods (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Three-dimensional models showed, overall, the highest interobserver agreement (experts versus residents in orthopedics) for the choice of treatment of proximal humerus fractures compared to X-ray, Tomography, and Holography. Agreement in the choice of treatment among experts that used Tomography and Holography as diagnostic methods were two times higher compared to residents.

Trial registration

Registered in Brazil Platform under no. CAAE 12273519.7.0000.5505.

Is antegrade nailing a proper option in 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures?

PURPOSE

To report our experience with antegrade short locked intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures and to review the current literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2013, 41 patients affected by two and three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated with surgical internal fixation with short locked intramedullary nails. Outcome analysis included standard clinical follow-up, Constant shoulder score and plain radiographs. The mean follow-up was 30 months (range 24-42). Moreover, a review of the literature was carried out.

RESULTS

The mean Constant shoulder score was 81.5, excellent functional outcomes in 24/38 patients. All the fractures healed in an average time of 3.7 months. Five patients underwent additional operations, complications included hardware penetration into the joint (n = 2), backed out screw (n = 1), shoulder impingement due to protrusion of the nail (n = 2) and superficial infection (n = 1). The literature review showed 530 patients affected by proximal humeral fracture and treated with intramedullary nail with mean age of 65 years, mean follow-up of 22.2 months and a Constant shoulder score of 72.9 points; the major complications reported were backing out of the screws, shoulder impingement and joint protrusion of the screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade short locked intramedullary nail allows stable fixation, minimal soft tissue dissection, early mobilization of the shoulder and good outcomes. It is an efficacious therapeutic solution for 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures.

Intramedullary Fixation for Proximal Humeral Fractures

Proximal humeral fractures are a commonly encountered injury; however, no consensus has been reached for the ideal treatment. Current surgical fixation options include plate, plate with fibular strut allograft, intramedullary fixation, pinning, suture constructs, and external fixation. Each of these options possesses distinct advantages and disadvantages. With the evolution of implant design, a greater understanding of the mechanisms of failure of fixation, and the ability to preserve fracture biology, the management of proximal humeral fractures with intramedullary fixation has become an accepted treatment option. From a biomechanical perspective, intramedullary fixation may have advantages over laterally based fixation, in particular with fractures associated with significant calcar comminution. The ability to insert the implant from a superior starting point may help preserve vascular supply to the humeral head and tuberosities. With reported outcomes comparable with the aforementioned techniques and an evolving understanding of fracture characteristics and failures of fixation, intramedullary fixation represents an alternative treatment option for proximal humeral fractures with specific fixation and biologic advantages.

Indications and results of osteosynthesis for proximal humerus fragility fractures in elderly patients

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common injuries in the elderly population. Conservative treatment is indicated for undisplaced and stable fractures, which account for almost 80% of the cases. More complex fracture patterns might need surgery, with a wide variety of indication criteria and surgical techniques described in the literature. Surgical treatment should be reserved for patients in good clinical conditions, autonomous in daily living activities and able to adhere to postoperative rehabilitation protocols. In the elderly population with severe osteoporosis, cognitive impairment and clinical comorbidities, the risk of surgical failures is high. In these patients, the choice between surgical and conservative treatment, as well as for the type of procedure, is even more difficult, with no general consensus in the literature. Final indication is usually conditioned by surgeon's experience and preference. Two independent reviewers (B.H and G.G) independently extracted studies on proximal humeral fractures. All selected studies were screened independently (B.H and G.G) based on title and abstract. Then the full text of any article that either judged potentially eligible was acquired and reviewed again. Any disagreement was resolved by discussing the full text manuscripts. Aim of the present paper is to review the literature about indications and results of osteosynthesis for proximal humerus fragility fractures in the elderly population.

Rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after intra-medullary humerus nailing

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade percutaneous intra-medullary nailing (IMN) has a poor reputation in the treatment of humerus fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after IMN in humerus fracture.

HYPOTHESIS

Third-generation humeral nails (straight, small diameter, with locked screws) conserve rotator cuff tendon integrity and avoid the shoulder stiffness and pain incurred by 1st generation (large diameter, without self-blocking screw) and 2nd generation nails (curved, penetrating the supraspinatus insertion on the greater tuberosity).

METHODS

Forty patients (26 female, 14 male; mean age, 60 years (range, 20-89 years)) with displaced humeral fracture (23 proximal humerus, 17 humeral shaft) underwent IMN using a 3rd generation nail (34 Aequalis™ (Tornier-Wright), 6 MultiLoc™ (Depuy-Synthes)). Mean clinical, radiologic and ultrasound follow-up was 8 months (range, 6-18 months); 22 patients agreed to postoperative CT scan.

RESULTS

There were no revision surgeries for rotator cuff repair or secondary bone displacement. Mean Adjusted Constant Score (ACS) was 93±22% and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) 77±18%. Elevation was 140±36°, external rotation 48±22° and internal rotation was to L3. Ultrasound found: 5 supraspinatus tendon lesions (12.5%) (2 full and 3 deep partial tears) without functional impact (ACS) 91% without vs. 107% with tear; (p=0.12); 2 of the deep partial tears involved excessively lateral and high nail positioning. Eight patients (20%) had painful tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon associated with significantly impaired functional scores (ACS 65% vs. 100%; p<0.001); and 4 cases of technical error: 3 of anterior LHB screwing in the groove, and 1 of LHB irritation due to an excessively long posterior screw.

CONCLUSION

Supraspinatus tendon lesions following IMN with a 3^rd-generation humeral nail were rare (12.5%) and asymptomatic; prevalence was not higher than in the general population in the literature (16%). LHB tendinopathy was frequent (20%) and symptomatic, and due to technical error in half of the cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Early displacement of two part proximal humerus fractures treated with intramedullary proximal humeral nail

Introduction

Proximal humerus nails (PHN) are commonly used for the treatment of simple proximal humerus fractures, and have a reported malunion rate of about 10%. The surgeons who used PHN in one medical institution have noticed a high rate of fracture re-displacement in the early post-operative period. This study's aim is to evaluate the rate of secondary displacement and malunion of patients treated for two part proximal humerus fractures with an angle-stable PHN (MultiLoc), and to assess possible risk factors for this secondary displacement.

Methods

A retrospective study comprised of 25 consecutive patients with 2 part surgical neck or metaphysis displaced proximal humerus fracture, treated with PHN between the years 2014-2017. Results assessed included radiographic measures (neck-shaft angle) and clinical data: range of motion (ROM) and functional scores (Constant, DASH, SSV). A univariate regression analysis was used to assess possible risk factors for secondary displacement.

Results

Mean age was 66.6 (range 17-93), and mean follow up was 20 months (range 6-40). Mean neck shaft angle (NSA) changed from 139.1° post operatively to 122.6° at last follow up, with 6 patients (24%) having a NSA change larger than 20°. Two patients (8%) ended up with NSA less than 90°, defined as malunion. The deltoid tuberosity index was found to correlate with the degree of displacement (-0.41, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

PHN for simple displaced proximal humerus fractures was associated with fair clinical results but an unacceptable rate secondary displacement. The deltoid tuberosity index was found to correlate with the degree of this secondary displacement.

Anatomic locking plates for complex proximal humeral fractures: anatomic neck fractures versus surgical neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Continued debate exists on the management of displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Only a few studies have compared the efficacy of proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs) for treating anatomic neck fractures (ANFs) and surgical neck fractures (SNFs).

METHODS

The medical data of 31 consecutive patients with displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with PHLPs between May 2013 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into the ANF and SNF groups and assessed the neck-shaft angle (NSA), sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance, and other parameters postoperatively at 3 days and at 12 months using shoulder radiographs. The Constant-Murley scores were assessed at 3 days, 12 months, and last follow-up.

RESULTS

The ANF group had a significantly lower mean age and significantly greater mean operative duration, estimated blood loss, and rate of bone grafting. Full or partial osteonecrosis of the humeral head developed in 7 patients and 1 patient in the ANF and SNF groups, respectively. Screw cutout and/or pullout complications occurred in 8 cases in the ANF group but not in the SNF group. In the ANF group, the values for NSA and the sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance changed significantly from 3 days to 12 months postoperatively. There were no significant correlations among the tested parameters.

CONCLUSION

ANFs resulted in more complications at a younger age than SNFs. ANF treatment using PHLPs is more prone to a decreased NSA and humeral head osteonecrosis and has poorer clinical outcomes than SNF treatment using PHLPs.

Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

The high rates of complications and reoperations observed with the early designs of first-generation (unlocked) and second-generation (bent design) humeral intramedullary nail (IMNs) have discouraged their use by most surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a third-generation (straight, locking, low-profile, tuberosity-based fixation) IMN, inserted through a percutaneous approach, for the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent placement of a third-generation IMN to treat a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture (AO/OTA type 11A3). The mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 17-84 years). After percutaneous insertion through the humeral head, the IMN was used as a reduction tool. Static locking fixation was achieved after axial fracture compression ("back-slap" hammering technique). Patients were reviewed and underwent radiography with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-53 months).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 3 types of surgical neck fractures were observed: with valgus head deformity (Type A = 8 cases), shaft translation without head deformity (Type B = 19 cases), or with varus head deformity (Type C = 14 cases). At final follow-up, all fractures went on to union, and the mean humeral neck-shaft angle was 132° ± 5°. We observed 2 malunions and 1 case of partial humeral head avascular necrosis. No cases underwent screw migration or intra-articular penetration. At last review, mean active forward elevation was 146° (range, 90°-180°) and mean external rotation was 50° (range, 20°-80°). The mean Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were 71 (range, 43-95) and 80% (range, 50%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade insertion of a third-generation IMN through a percutaneous approach provides a high rate of fracture healing, excellent clinical outcome scores, and a low rate of complications. No morbidity related to the passage of the nail through the supraspinatus muscle and the cartilage was observed. The proposed A, B, and C classification allows choosing the optimal entry point for intramedullary nailing.

Outcomes following fixation for proximal humeral fractures

Fractures of the proximal humerus are a very common presentation in modern Trauma and Orthopaedic practice. In an ever-aging population, the incidence has dramatically increased resulting in a large socioeconomical burden. The surgical management of these injuries has evolved over the years. Patient outcomes are variable and there is no consensus on treatment approach. This review article focuses on the outcomes following fracture fixation using common surgical techniques.

Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Proximal and shaft humeral fractures are very common worldwide; surgical treatment can be a viable option to reduce limb immobilization and to allow the patient an earlier return to daily activities. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with intramedullary nail in our Institute from January 2010 to December 2016.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: traumatic proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with antegrade nail; a minimum follow-up of 6 months. We evaluated the fracture healing time, the functional recovery (using the Constant score) and postoperative complications (need of blood transfusion, infections and need of re-intervention). The t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included (20 proximal and 75 diaphyseal fractures). Bone callus formation was evident a mean of 57 days after surgery. In all patients, there was an improvement in the functional recovery over time, but those younger than 65 years had better outcomes. The type of fracture and patients' gender did not affect these results at one and 6 months of follow-up. In 18 cases, blood transfusions were needed; infections never occurred; finally, revision surgery was performed in 10 cases (two reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, one open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws and seven nail removals for intolerance).

CONCLUSION

In our study, intramedullary nail proved to be a minimally invasive technique with a rapid improvement in range of motion, an earlier rehabilitation and acceptable pain.

Straight proximal humeral nailing: Risk of iatrogenic tendon injuries with respect to different entry points in anatomical specimens

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship of implant-related injuries to the adjacent anatomical structures in a newer generation straight proximal humeral nail (PHN) regarding different entry points. The proximity of the proximal lateral locking-screws of the MultiLoc proximal humeral nail (ML PHN) may cause iatrogenic tendon injuries to the lateral edge of the bicipital humeral groove (BG) as reference point for the tendon of the long head of biceps brachii (LBT) as well as the lateral insertion of the infraspinatus tendon (IST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised n = 40 upper extremities. Nail application was performed through a deltoid approach and supraspinatus tendon (SSP) split with a ML PHN. All tests were performed in three different entry points. First nail (N1) - standard position in line with the humeral shaft axis; second nail (N2) - a more lateral entry point; third alternative (N3) - medial position, centre of the humeral head. After nail placement, each specimen was screened for potential implant-related injuries or worded differently hit rates (HR) to the BG and the IST. The distances to the anatomical structures were measured and statistically interpreted.

RESULTS

The observed iatrogenic IST injury rate was 17.5% (n = 7/40) for N1, 5% (n = 2/40) for N2 and 62.5% (n = 25/40) for N3, which was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001). Regarding the BG, the evaluated HR was 7.5% (n = 3/40) for both N1 and N2. Only the nail placed in the head centre (N3) showed an iatrogenic injury rate of 20% (n = 8/40) (p < 0.062). No statistically significant association between humeral head size and the HR could be observed (head diameter: IST: p = 0.323, BG: p = 0.621; head circumference: IST: p = 0.167; BG: p = 0.940). For the IST and BG, all distances in nail positions N1 and N2 as well as N2 and N3 differ statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An entry point for nail placement in line or slightly laterally to the humeral shaft axis - but still at the cartilage - should be advocated.

Management of Acute Proximal Humeral Fractures

Proximal humeral fractures, which typically occur in elderly persons, are among the most common fractures. A myriad of nonsurgical and surgical treatment options exist for these injuries, including short-term immobilization and early physical therapy, percutaneous fixation, plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary nailing, hemiarthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The choice of treatment depends on the fracture type and severity, surgeon expertise, patient age, and patient health status.

Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly. Although most fractures can be treated conservatively with acceptable outcomes, certain fracture patterns are at high risk for progression to humeral malunions, nonunions, stiffness, and post-traumatic arthrosis. The goal of antegrade humeral nailing of proximal humerus fractures is to provide stability to a reduced fracture that allows early motion to optimize patient outcomes. Certain technical pearls are pivotal in managing these difficult fractures with nails; these include rotator cuff management, respect of the soft tissues, anatomic tuberosity position, blood supply maintenance, knowledge of the deforming forces on the proximal humerus, fracture reduction, and rehabilitation strategies. Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques assist the surgeon in adhering to these principles and have demonstrated promising outcomes. Humeral nail designs have undergone significant innovation during the past 40 years and now can provide stable fixation in the humeral shaft distally as well as improved stability in the head and tuberosity fragments, which were the common site of fixation failure with earlier generation implants. Compared with other fixation strategies, such as locking plate fixation, no compelling evidence exists to suggest one technique over another. The purpose of this review is to describe the history, results, new designs, and techniques that make modern intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures a viable treatment option.

Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

Background

While proximal humerus fractures remain common within the elderly population, the optimal treatment method remains controversial. Intramedullary nailing has been advocated as an effective and less invasive surgical technique. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the demographics, outcomes, and complications of intramedullary nailing for acute, displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Materials and methods

Multiple computerized literature databases were used to perform a systematic review of English-language literature. Studies that met our stated criteria were further assessed for the requisite data, and when possible, similar outcome data were combined to generate frequency-weighted means.

Results

Fourteen studies with 448 patients met our inclusion criteria. The frequency-weighted mean age was 64.3 years, and mean follow-up was 22.6 months. Females accounted for 71 % of the included patients. Three-part fractures (51 %) were most commonly treated. The overall frequency-weighted mean Constant score was 72.8, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 84.3. Frequency-weighted mean forward elevation, abduction, extension, and external rotation were 137.3°, 138.4°, 33.8°, and 43.1°, respectively. The Constant score for two- and three-part fractures was significantly higher than for four-part fractures (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0009, respectively). The reoperation rate for two-, three-, and four-part fractures was 13.6, 17.4, and 63.2 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Intramedullary nailing of acute, displaced two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures yields satisfactory clinical outcomes, although reoperation and complication rates remain high. Use of this implant for four-part fractures cannot be recommended until further clinical studies with larger patient numbers are available.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Systematic review.

Midterm outcome and complications after minimally invasive treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients younger than 70 years using the Humerusblock

INTRODUCTION

The Humerusblock (HB) represents a minimally invasive implant allowing for the stabilisation of proximal humeral fractures after closed or percutaneous reduction. The aim of the study was to perform a general clinical and radiological midterm follow-up focusing on the quality and complications in a large series of patients of younger age (<70 years).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 126 patients with an average age of 53.6 years treated surgically using the HB device were evaluated clinically using the Constant score (CS) and radiologically by biplanar radiographs after a mean follow-up time of 59 months. Thirty-three patients had a two-part fracture, 58 a three-part fracture and 35 a four-part fracture. Ultrasound imaging for bilateral rotator cuff evaluation was performed, and complications regarding implant failure, revision rate and post-traumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) were analysed.

RESULTS

The average CS was 77.3 points for the affected shoulder and 86.5 points for the unaffected shoulder (P=0.001). The subjective shoulder value was 84.2%. Two-part fractures achieved 77.5 points, three-part fractures 81.7 points and four-part fractures 69.8 points. Surgical neck non-union was observed in 1.3% and AVN was observed in 11% associated with a CS of 46.4 points. Implant failure occurred in 9.6%. Varus malposition was present in 36%, and it was clinically relevant when exceeding 25°.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous fracture treatment using the HB achieves good functional outcomes with an acceptable complication rate. The rate of AVN was surprisingly high, especially in four-part fractures (26%), which presumably is due to the longer follow-up period. Varus malalignment was clinically relevant when exceeding 25°.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series (evidence-based medicine (EBM) level IV).

Is there any advantage in placing an additional calcar screw in locked nailing of proximal humeral fractures?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of an additional unlocked calcar screw compared to a standard setting with three proximal humeral head screws alone for fixation of an unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck.

HYPOTHESIS

The additional calcar screw improves stiffness and failure load.

METHODS

Fourteen fresh frozen humeri were randomized into two equal sized groups. An unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck was simulated and all specimens were fixed with the MultiLoc(®)-nail. Group I represented a basic screw setup, with three locked head screws and two unlocked shaft screws. Group II was identical with a supplemental unlocked calcar screw (CS). Stiffness tests were performed in torsional loading, as well as in axial and in 20° abduction/20° adduction modes. Subsequently cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were performed. Resulting stiffness, displacement under cyclic load and ultimate load were compared between groups using the t-test for independent variables (α=0.05).

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the groups in any of the biomechanical parameters. Backing out of the CS was observed in three cases.

DISCUSSION

The use of an additional unlocked calcar screw does not provide mechanical benefit in locked nailing of an unstable 2-part fracture of the surgical neck.

Factors that Influence Reduction Loss in Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to identify the risk factors for reduction loss after locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University trauma center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

We retrospectively evaluated 252 patients who had been surgically treated for proximal humeral fractures with locking plates between January 2004 and December 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Charts and standardized x-rays (true anteroposterior and axillary lateral views) were used to evaluate the Neer and AO OTA fracture types, initial neck-shaft angle (NSA, varus displacement), medial comminution, postoperative NSA (reduction adequacy), medial support restoration, healing progress, reduction loss, and implant-related problems immediately after surgery and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and at least 1 year after surgery. Reduction loss was defined as (1) ≥10 of angulation in any direction, (2) ≥5 mm of height loss of the humeral head from the plate, and (3) fixation failure.

RESULTS

Reduction loss occurred in 6.7% (17 of 252) of cases; revision surgeries were performed in all cases. Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (P = 0.023), osteoporosis (P = 0.001), varus displacement (P = 0.001), medial comminution (P = 0.001), reduction adequacy (P = 0.036), and insufficient medial support (P = 0.001) had significant correlations with reduction loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariable regression analysis revealed that osteoporosis (less than -2.5 bone mineral density, P = 0.015), displaced varus fracture (less than 110° of NSA, P = 0.025), medial comminution (more than 1 fragment, P = 0.018), and insufficient medial support (no cortical or screw support, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for reduction loss in the proximal humerus fractures surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical investigation for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: a randomized study of two surgical treatments: reverse total prosthetic replacement versus angular stable plate Philos (The DELPHI-trial)

BACKGROUND

Treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures is still under debate. Few studies exist at the highest level of evidence. Although reversed total shoulder prosthesis has gained popularity and showed promising results in the treatment for proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients, no randomized controlled trials exist to the authors' knowledge.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a randomized semi-blinded controlled multicenter trial designed according to the Consort statement and the recommendations given by the Cochrane reviewers for proximal humeral fractures. The study will investigate whether a reversed total shoulder prosthetic replacement gain better functional outcome compared to open reduction and internal fixation using an angular stable plate in displaced three- and four parts proximal humeral fractures after two and five years follow-up.Participants are aged 65-85 admitted in seven different hospitals with a displaced proximal humeral fracture according to AO-OTA type 11-B2 or 11-C2. The intervention group is surgical treatment using a reversed total shoulder prosthesis (Delta X-tend) compared to open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (Philos) and thread cerclage in the control group. 60 patients will be randomized to each group.The primary outcome is shoulder function (Constant score). Secondary outcomes will be patient self-assessment form (Oxford shoulder score), a quality of life questionnaire (15D score) and resource implications (cost-effectiveness). Follow-ups take place at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, and five years. The trial design is semi-blinded with blinded physiotherapists performing the functional testing of patients at all follow-ups.Randomization to treatment groups is electronic online, by independent supervisor (web-CRF). The recruitment of patients started at January 1.st 2013. Inclusion of 120 patients during three years is expected.

DISCUSSION

This semiblinded trial include a high number of patients compared to existing randomized trials in this field. To our knowledge and according to ClinicalTrials.gov, this is the first study that compare these two treatments for a displaced proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. This may provide important information to help the surgeon to decide the best treatment in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01737060.

Risk of injury to the axillary nerve during antegrade proximal humeral blade nail fixation - an anatomical study

INTRODUCTION

The antegrade intramedullary Locking Blade Nail (Marquardt, Germany) is a device aimed at improving purchase in the humeral head and reducing varus displacement by providing medial buttress support and triangular stability within the humeral head. The aim of this study is to measure the relationship of the proximal fixation screws to the axillary nerve.

METHODS

13 whole cadavers underwent insertion of an antegrade proximal humeral blade nail via a deltoid split approach to both shoulders. The anatomic proximity of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve to the screws was measured following soft tissue dissection and inspection of the nerve.

RESULTS

The mean distance of the nerve from the anterolateral acromion was 62 mm (range 45-81 mm). The nerve lay closest to the distal blade fixation screw 4.9 mm (range 0-19 mm). In three cases the nerve lay directly underneath the washer and in all three cases there was macroscopic evidence of damage to the nerve. In 5 cases the nerve travelled obliquely in a cranial direction to lie 1.8 mm (range 0-3 mm) from the distal blade fixation screw, in 2 of these cases the nerve lay beneath the washer.

CONCLUSION

The anterior branch of the axillary nerve is placed at risk during insertion of the locking screws despite use of protection sleeves and trocars. We advocate that when using antegrade intramedullary nails that incorporate an inferomedial calcar screw an extended anterolateral acromial approach is undertaken.

Comparison of modified Hackethal bundle nailing versus anterograde nailing for fixation of surgical neck fractures of the humerus: retrospective study of 105 cases

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary fixation of displaced surgical neck fractures of the humerus can be performed either by retrograde pinning or anterograde nailing. The goal of the current study was to compare the postoperative reduction and stability obtained with these two techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

Intramedullary nailing will provide the best reduction and stabilization of these fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study that included patients with sub-tuberosity fractures with or without greater tuberosity fragment. These patients were treated either by retrograde Hackethal type pinning (group 1) or Telegraph anterograde nailing (group 2). To be included, patients needed to have A/P and lateral X-rays that had been taken before the surgery, immediately post-operative, between four and six weeks post-operative, and at the last follow-up. The outcomes were head angulation, translation and greater tuberosity position.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients (40 retrograde pinning and 65 anterograde nailing) with an average age of 69 years (18-97 years) were included. The pre-operative fracture displacement was similar between the two groups. After the surgery, the A/P head angulation had been corrected in 72.5% of patients in group 1 and 84% in group 2 (no significant difference). Translation was still present in 17.5% of patients in group 1 and 1.5% in group 2 (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, union was achieved without residual angulation on lateral X-rays in 71% of patients in group 1 and 88% in group 2 (P<0.05). The fractures had healed with residual translation is 19.5% of patients in group 1 and 3% in group 2 (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In cases of displaced surgical neck fractures with or without a greater tuberosity fragment, anterograde nailing provides better reduction and stability than retrograde pinning. However, fixation of the greater tuberosity fragment must be improved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective comparative study).

Proximal humeral fractures: a review of current concepts

The majority of proximal humerus fractures are sustained via low energy falls in the elderly population. These patients can attain an acceptable level of function via non-operative treatment. There is yet to be a clear consensus on treatment options suitable for those that fall outside of this majority group. Open reduction internal fixation, intra medullary nailing and arthroplasty surgery have all been used to varying effects. Good results are achievable if complications such as mal-union, non-union and avascular necrosis can be avoided. This review aims to clarify the options available to the current day trauma surgeon.

Biomechanical considerations for surgical stabilization of osteoporotic fractures

The incidence of osteoporotic fractures has been steadily rising along with the aging of the population. Surgical management of these fractures can be a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. Diminished bone mass and frequent comminution make fixation difficult. Advancements in implant design and fixation techniques have served to address these challenges and when properly applied, can improve overall outcome. The purpose of this review is to describe fixation challenges of common osteoporotic fractures and provide options for successful treatment.

Proximal humerus fractures

Proximal humeral fractures are extremely common injuries, and are one of the true osteoporotic fractures. Most fractures can be effectively treated nonoperatively, as the rich vascularity and broad cancellous surfaces impart a high propensity for healing. Additionally, many fracture patterns result in adequate bone contact and minimal displacement with acceptable alignment. Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced fractures can improve outcomes, depending on the pre-injury functional status of the patient. If operative treatment is selected, unique treatment challenges must be overcome, including obtaining and maintaining reduction of small bone fragments with strong muscle forces, often in osteoporotic bone. Many options are feasible, including plates, nails, sutures, and other novel devices. Locking plates are the most common device used, but technical detail is critical to minimize the risk of implant failure, loss of reduction, and reoperation.