A population-based comparison of the incidence of adverse outcomes after simultaneous-bilateral and staged-bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Subsequent total joint arthroplasty: Are we learning from the first stage?

BACKGROUND

With the increasing incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there is a desire to reduce peri-operative complications and resource utilization. As degenerative conditions progress in multiple joints, many patients undergo multiple procedures.

AIM

To determine if both physicians and patients learn from the patient's initial arthroplasty, resulting in improved outcomes following the second procedure.

METHODS

The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients with only unilateral THA or TKA, and patients undergoing same-day bilateral TJA, were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were collected at the time of each procedure and patients were stratified by first vs second surgery. Outcome metrics evaluated included operative time, length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-d readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.

RESULTS

A total of 642 patients, including 364 undergoing staged bilateral TKA and 278 undergoing bilateral THA, were analyzed. There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the first and second procedure, which were separated by a mean of 285 d. For THA and TKA, LOS was significantly less for the second surgery, with 66% of patients having a shorter hospitalization (P < 0.001). THA patients had significantly decreased operative time only when the same sized implant was utilized (P = 0.025). The vast majority (93.3%) of patients were discharged to the same type of location following their second surgery. However, when a change in disposition was present from the first surgery, patients were significantly more likely to be discharged to home after the second procedure (P = 0.033). There was no difference between procedures for post-operative readmissions (P = 0.438) or ED visits (P = 0.915).

CONCLUSION

After gaining valuable experience recovering from the initial surgery, a patient's perioperative outcomes are improved for their second TJA. This may be the result of increased confidence and decreased anxiety, and it supports the theory that enhanced patient education pre-operatively may improve outcomes. For the surgical team, the second procedure of a staged THA is more efficient, although this finding did not hold for TKA.

No differences in terms of complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes in simultaneous bilateral versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty in selected patients

BACKGROUND

The safety and the clinical success of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare complications and patient-reported outcomes following simultaneous BTKA (simBTKA) versus staged BKTA (staBTKA) in patients affected by bilateral symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent simBTKA or staBTKA at a single institution from January 2017 to December 2020, with a minimum 1-year follow up period were retrospectively collected. Differences in terms of complications and clinical success were compared among the simBTKA and staBTKA patient groups. Alpha was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were included in this study. The results revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mortality, revision rate, readmission rate, local and systemic complications and patient-reported outcomes. SimBTKA group had a shorter operating room time (96 (73-119) vs. 195 (159-227); P < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay (4 (3-5) vs. 7 (6-9); P < 0.0001) compared with the staBTKA group.

CONCLUSIONS

SimBTKA performed in a selected patient population at a high-volume center can be considered comparable to staBTKA in terms of safety, postoperative complications, 30-day readmissions and patient satisfaction. Consequently, reduced operating room time and hospital stay renders simBTKA a cost-effective and advantageous option, not only for patients, but also for healthcare institutes. Furthermore, the current study also highlights the importance of correct patient selection based on clinical preoperative characteristics.

Incidence of Postoperative Infection Following Simultaneous Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty involves performing total knee arthroplasty on both knees in a single anesthetic session. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. A primary search was performed using PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Clarivate, and Google Scholar databases. Quantitative data synthesis was performed using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.115 to determine the pooled prevalence of the infection among patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. We included 30 studies in our quantitative data synthesis, with a total population of 118,502 patients (237,004 knees). The pooled prevalence of superficial infection, deep infection, and unspecified surgical site infection was estimated to be 0.86% (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.13%), 0.84% (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.05%), and 1.18% (95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.27%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity (I2 >50%) in all analyses, and inspection of funnel plots revealed a symmetrical distribution of plotted data. We found that the infection rates following simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty were relatively low but heterogeneous, as the data showed marked variability. Superficial infections were more common than deep infections; however, there was a small difference in their prevalence. Furthermore, the reliability of our findings was limited owing to significant heterogeneity.

Complications following single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty and unilateral procedures: experience of a high-volume community hospital

INTRODUCTION

The safety of single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SSBTKA) compared to unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The present study compares the 90-day postoperative complications encountered following SSBTKA and unilateral TKA in an unselected cohort of patients performed at a high-volume community hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The perioperative electronic medical records of an unselected consecutive cohort of 1032 patients (1345 knees) having undergone unilateral or SSBTKA were reviewed. Ninety-day postoperative complications or need for additional procedures were compared between unilateral and SSBTKA groups.

RESULTS

A total of 719 and 313 patients underwent unilateral and SSBTKA, respectively. There were no significant differences in age or BMI between groups. Patients undergoing SSBTKA were more likely to be male (p = 0.019), have longer lengths of stay (p < 0.001) and were less likely to discharge directly home (13.1%) compared to unilateral patients (80.9%) (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing SSBTKA were more likely to require a transfusion (14.7%) compared to unilateral patients (2.2%) (p < 0.001). Interestingly, mortality rate following unilateral TKA (1.7%) was significantly higher than SSBTKA (0.0%) (p = 0.013). There were no significant differences regarding other complications or need for additional procedures within 90 days following surgery.

CONCLUSION

SSBTKA did not result in greater complications when compared to unilateral TKA in this particular cohort. As expected, transfusion rates will likely be higher and there will be a greater need for acute inpatient care following surgery for SSBTKA patients.

Mortality Following Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) is a common intervention for bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and the choice between simultaneous (SimBTKA) and staged (StaBTKA) procedures remains a critical decision. This meta-analysis systematically reviews and analyzes the existing literature to compare mortality outcomes associated with SimBTKA and StaBTKA. A comprehensive search was conducted across major databases for studies reporting mortality outcomes in SimBTKA and StaBTKA. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies published up to the cutoff date of January 2023, and a total of 37 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Review Manage 5.4 software. The meta-analysis included 86,333 SimBTKA cases and 115,146 StaBTKA cases. The overall mortality rate in SimBTKA was 0.66%, while StaBTKA's was 0.43%. The pooled OR for mortality in SimBTKA versus StaBTKA was 1.55 [1.16, 2.08], indicating a statistically significant higher mortality risk in SimBTKA. Our findings suggest that SimBTKA is associated with an increased risk of mortality compared to StaBTKA. This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the comparative mortality outcomes of SimBTKA and StaBTKA. While SimBTKA may offer potential advantages, including a single anesthesia event and shorter recovery time, clinicians should consider the increased mortality risk associated with this approach. Future research should focus on prospective studies with standardized reporting to further elucidate the nuanced factors influencing mortality outcomes in bilateral knee arthroplasty.

Complications in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, is it a safe procedure?

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding various aspects of simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement (SBTKR). We found disparity in the postoperative outcomes and complications associated with the procedure in the literature linked with the topic.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the need for blood transfusion after surgery and complications associated with total knee replacement according to the type of procedure (SBTKR or unilateral).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analytical study. We included 251 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis that were divided into two groups. 124 (49%) who underwent SBTKR and 127 upon whom unilateral total knee replacement (UTKR) was performed. Demographic data, days of hospitalization, complications within the first 90 days after surgery (thromboembolic events, superficial and deep infection, stiffness, death); and percentages of patients transfused with blood products during hospitalization were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in the analysis of postoperative complications in the first 90 days after surgery. In the SBTKR group, 8 patients (6.5%) presented some thromboembolic complication during the postoperative period, while this event was observed in only 2 patients (1.5%) from the other group. The analysis showed a statistically significant drop in postoperative hemoglobin, on average that of 0.8 ​g/dl, in the SBTKR patient group compared to the UTKR group (95% CI 0.44-1.13; p ​< ​0.001). A higher proportion of patients who required transfusion were observed in the SBTKR group (40%) (OR ​= ​7.12; 95% CI 3.3-16; p ​< ​0.001). We analyzed the cause of postoperative transfusion in the patients who required transfusion taking into account two parameters: hemoglobin less than 8 ​g/dl and the clinical needs of the patients (symptoms of hypotension, decay, difficulty to rehabilitate without pain, dyspnea). 59 patients received transfusion (50 in the SBTKR group and 9 in the other group). Of these, 19 patients (32.2%) did not meet any transfusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

We consider SBTKR a safe procedure, which does not increase postoperative complications compared to UTKR. Although there is an increase in blood loss in SBTKR, it does not generate clinical symptoms of relevance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Complications and Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Patient Characteristic and Comorbidity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful surgical procedure that decreases pain and improves function. Many patients who undergo TKA may require surgical intervention on both extremities because of bilateral osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of simultaneous bilateral TKA compared with that of unilateral TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent unilateral or simultaneous bilateral primary, elective TKA from 2015 to 2020 were identified using the Premier Healthcare Database. Subsequently, the simultaneous bilateral TKA cohort was matched to the unilateral TKA cohort in a 1:6 ratio by age, sex, race, and presence of pertinent comorbidities. Patient characteristics, hospital factors, and comorbidities were compared between the cohorts. The 90-day risks of postoperative complications, readmission, and in-hospital death were assessed. Differences were assessed using univariable regression, and multivariable regression analyses were performed to account for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 21,044 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA and 126,264 matched patients who underwent unilateral TKA were included. After accounting for confounding factors, patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA demonstrated a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications, including pulmonary embolism (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.13 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57 to 2.89]; p < 0.001), stroke (adjusted OR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.42 to 3.42]; p < 0.001), acute blood loss anemia (adjusted OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.99 to 2.13]; p < 0.001), and transfusion (adjusted OR, 7.84 [95% CI, 7.16 to 8.59]; p < 0.001). Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA were at increased risk of 90-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.48]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with increased rates of complications including pulmonary embolism, stroke, and transfusion. Orthopaedic surgeons and patients should consider these potential complications when contemplating simultaneous bilateral TKA. When simultaneous bilateral TKA is pursued, patient counseling and thorough medical optimization should be performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Perioperative Complications in Patients over 70 Years of Age following Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (ssBTKA) can be used for patients presenting with bilateral arthritis and may result in fewer systemic and wound complications compared with two, independent procedures. However, the safety of ssBTKA in the elderly remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare early complications and transfusion rates following ssBTKA in patients ≤ 70 years old or > 70 years old. This retrospective chart review of 313 consecutive patients undergoing ssBTKA included 174 patients ≤ 70 years old and 139 patients > 70 years old. Perioperative variables and postoperative complications were compared with univariate analyses between age groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for developing perioperative complications and transfusions. Compared with patients ≤ 70, patients > 70 had significantly lower body mass index (p < 0.001) and were more commonly female (p = 0.024). Although wound (p > 0.12) and systemic complications (p > 0.54) were similar, 23% of patients > 70 required transfusion compared with only 8% of patients ≤ 70 (p < 0.001). Patients with preoperative anemia (p < 0.001), age > 70 (p = 0.002), or diabetes mellitus (p = 0.007) were at 5.7, 3.3, and 2.9 times greater risk for requiring a transfusion, respectively. Patients > 70 undergoing ssBTKA have a similar complication profile to patients ≤ 70 years old, suggesting age should not be an absolute exclusion criterion for ssBTKA. However, the risk of transfusion was significantly higher in those > 70, despite lower tourniquet times. Treatment of preoperative anemia may decrease the risk of transfusion and could provide adequate safety for patients > 70 to undergo ssBTKA by an experienced surgeon.

Is sequential bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A matched comparative pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To our knowledge, no papers have reported the results of robotic-assisted surgery for sequential bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Indeed, sequential bilateral TKA present several benefits, as one single anesthesia, surgical episode, hospitalization, and rehabilitation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate peri-operative outcomes and compare the complication rates, clinical outcomes, and implant positioning of sequential bilateral TKA performed with a robotic-assisted system versus a conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a sequential bilateral robotic-assisted primary TKA (raTKA) in our institution between November 2019 and February 2021 were included. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 20 sequential bilateral TKA performed with a conventional technique. The two groups were comparable for the demographic data and the preoperative parameters, including preoperative anticoagulation and ASA score. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

The operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (< 0.0001), with a mean additional time of 29 min. There was no significant difference between both groups for postoperative blood loss, rate of blood transfusion, or postoperative pain. The average length of stay was 5 days. There was one early complication in the robotic group due to the tibial trackers. The functional outcomes were similar between both groups, except for the functional KSS score, which was better at 6 months in the robotic group (p < 0.0001). The restoration of the knee alignment and the distal femoral anatomy were significantly better in the robotic group than in the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a longer operative time, the peri-operative parameters of sequential bilateral TKA were similar between robotic and conventional techniques. Further, sequential bilateral raTKA was at least as safe as a conventional technique, without additional risk of medical complications.

Can single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty be safely performed in patients over 70?

Background

For patients with bilateral, symptomatic unicompartmental knee arthritis, single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (ssBUKA) presents an attractive option. However, most studies have examined younger patient cohorts and the safety of ssBUKA remains controversial for older individuals. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare complication rates following ssBUKA for patients ≤70 and > 70 years old.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 238 patients having undergone ssBUKA was performed, including 134 patients ≤70 and 104 patients >70. Post-operative complications were recorded at the six-week post-operative visit, along with emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 90 days.

Results

Compared to patients ≤70, patients >70 were more frequently female (43.3% and 55.8%, respectively) (p = 0.037) and had significantly lower body mass index (30.41 ± 4.64 and 27.30 ± 3.68, respectively) (p < 0.001). Patients >70 were discharged home (50%) less commonly than patients ≤70 (73.1%) (p < 0.001). Two patients ≤70 (1.5%) and two patients >70 (1.9%) sought emergency room treatment (p = 0.589), with respiratory complications most common. There were no differences regarding any postoperative complications between patients ≤70 and > 70 years old.

Conclusion

These results suggest that patients >70 can safely undergo ssBUKA, as it does not appear to increase the incidence of early post-operative complications compared to patients ≤70. However, 50% of patients >70 were not able to discharge directly home following surgery.

The Optimal Period of Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures under Enhanced Recovery: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The implications of the interval of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures for postoperative complications and costs are not clear. We aimed to determine the optimal time interval between the two stages of bilateral TKA procedures under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

METHODS

This retrospective study of collected data included bilateral TKA cases under the ERAS protocol performed between 2018 and 2021 at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The staged time was subdivided into three groups according to the interval between the first TKA and second contralateral TKA: group 1: 2- to 6-month, group 2: 6- to 12-month, and group 3: >12 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS), hemoglobin (Hb) decrease, hematocrit (Hct) decrease, and albumin (Alb) decrease.

RESULTS

We analyzed 281 patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs between 2018 and 2021 at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Regarding postoperative complications, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.21). For the mean LOS, the 6- to 12-month group had a significantly shorter LOS compared with the 2- to 6-month group (P < 0.01). There was also a significant decrease in Hct of the 2- to 6-month group compared with the 6- to 12-month group and the >12 months group (P = 0.02; P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Staging the second arthroplasty for more than a half year seems to offer a reduction in the rate of postoperative complications and LOS under ERAS protocol. ERAS shortens the interval of staged bilateral TKA by at least 6 months for patients who might receive their second surgery without the need to wait for an extended period.

No Difference in Perioperative Complications for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Staged at 1 Week Compared With Delayed Staging

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding the safety of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus two TKA procedures staged months apart in patients with bilateral knee arthritis. Here, we investigated a third option: bilateral TKA staged 1 week apart. In this study, we examined the rate of complications in patients undergoing bilateral TKA staged at 1 week compared with longer time intervals.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 351 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral TKA at our institution was conducted. Patients underwent a 1-week staged bilateral procedure with planned interim transfer to a subacute rehabilitation facility (short-staged) or two separate unilateral TKA procedures within 1 year (long-staged). Binary logistic regression was used to compare outcomes while controlling for year of surgery, patient age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

Two hundred four short-staged and 147 long-staged bilateral TKA patients were included. The average interval between procedures in long-staged patients was 200.9 ± 95.9 days. Patients undergoing short-staged TKA had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.0 ± 1.5 versus 2.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.017) with no difference in preoperative hemoglobin ( P = 0.285) or body mass index ( P = 0.486). Regression analysis demonstrated that short-staged patients had a higher likelihood of requiring a blood transfusion (odds ratio 4.015, P = 0.005) but were less likely to return to the emergency department within 90 days (odds ratio 0.247, P = 0.001). No difference was observed in short-term complications ( P = 0.100), 90-day readmissions ( P = 0.250), or 1-year complications ( P = 0.418) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral TKA staged at a 1-week interval is safe with a comparable complication rate with delayed staged TKA, but allows for a faster total recovery time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Medium-term outcomes in single anaesthetic bilateral total knee replacement surgery: a single surgeon series

BACKGROUND

The lifetime risk of developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) is estimated to be 45%, with up to two thirds of patients presenting with bilateral knee symptoms. Patients presenting with end stage bilateral knee OA may benefit from single anaesthetic bilateral total knee replacement (SABTKR). Our study aim was to compare the outcomes of SABTKR with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a single surgeon series over a 20 year period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's data from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) over a 20-year period from January 1999 to December 2018. This review reports on patient demographics, functional outcomes, revision rates and mortality rates.

RESULTS

1225 total knee replacements were performed by the senior author (995 TKAs and 115 patients underwent SABTKRs) over the 20 year period reviewed. The mean ages of the TKA and SABTKR groups were 67.7 and 66.7 years, respectively. There was 16.9% mortality rate for the TKA group versus 7.8% in SABTKR group. There were no revisions in the SABTKR group versus 17 revisions in the TKA group representing a revision rate of 0.23/100 component years which can be viewed against a 20 year revision rate of 0.48/100 component years (p < 0.05) for all comers in the NZJR.

CONCLUSION

This NZJR study demonstrates excellent medium term survival outcomes for selected patients having simultaneous bilateral total knee replacements.

Blood Transfusion can be Avoided in Single-Anesthetic Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Female gender and surgical drain use have been associated with an increased transfusion risk following single-anesthetic bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). This study evaluated allogenic blood transfusion rates among female and male patients undergoing SBTKA with intraoperative tourniquet, tranexamic acid and contemporary blood transfusion thresholds but without surgical drain use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review for 125 consecutive patients undergoing SBTKA (250 knees) between May 1, 2015 and July 10, 2021. Patient demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists), preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, perioperative transfusions, operative time, and hospital length of stay were compared between 76 female (60.8%) and 49 male (39.2%) patient cohorts using paired Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test with a P value <.05 for significance.

RESULTS

No patient in either gender-based cohort received a perioperative allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion (P = 1). There were no significant differences in patient demographic features or medical comorbidities. Male patients had significantly higher mean preoperative (14.7 versus 13.7 g/dL, P < .01) and postoperative (12.7 versus 11.8 g/dL, P < .01) hemoglobin levels and a shorter mean hospital length of stay (2.5 versus 3.0 days, P < .01). There was no difference in the mean operative time (154.7 versus 150.7 minutes, P = .34) or change in the hemoglobin level (2.1 versus 1.9 g/dL, P = .27).

CONCLUSION

SBTKA can be performed with a limited risk of perioperative transfusion with a combination of intraoperative tourniquet, tranexamic acid, conservative blood transfusion criteria, and avoidance of postoperative drain use. Study results were not influenced by patient gender.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a level III, retrospective cohort study.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict complications in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study from two centers

Purpose

Complications were significantly increased 30 days after Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). In this study, an individualized nomogram was established and validated to predict the complications within 30 days after SBTKA.

Methods

The general data of 861 patients (training set) who received SBTKA in The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into complication group (n = 96) and non-complication group (n = 765) according to the incidence of complications within 30 years after SBTKA. Independent risk factors for postoperative SBTKA complications were identified and screened by binary logistic regression analyses, and then a nomogram prediction model was constructed using R software. The area under curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were selected to evaluate the line-chart. Meanwhile, 396 patients receiving SBTKA in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria (test set) were selected to verify the nomogram.

Results

Five independent predictors were identified by binary logistic regression analyses and a nomogram was established. The AUC of this nomogram curve is 0.851 (95% CI: 0.819–0.883) and 0.818 (95% CI: 0.735–0.900) in the training and testing sets, respectively. In the training set and test set, calibration curves show that nomogram prediction results are in good agreement with actual observation results, and DCA shows that nomogram prediction results have good clinical application value.

Conclusion

Older age, lower preoperative hemoglobin level, higher preoperative blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, longer operation time, ASA grade ≥ III are independent predictors of SBTKA complications within 30 days after surgery. A nomogram containing these five predictors can accurately predict the risk of complications within 30 days after SBTKA.

A nationwide comparison of staggered and simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty during a single hospitalization: Trends, risks and benefits

Background

We aimed to: (1) perform a nationwide trend analysis of staggered and simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty (KA); (2) investigate patient demographics and hospital characteristics in two groups; and (3) compare the outcomes of two groups with a focus on complications, length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs.

Methods

Utilizing the Hospital Quality Monitoring System, we included patients who underwent bilateral KA during a single hospitalization between 2013 and 2019. Patient demographics and hospital characteristics were compared between two groups. Outcomes were compared between propensity-score matched groups using logistic and linear regression.

Results

During the study period, 6291 staggered bilateral KA and 6284 simultaneous bilateral KA were performed. From 2013 to 2019, the proportion of staggered bilateral KA increased from 32.74% to 59.08%. Patients who were older, were single, had more comorbidities and had a non-osteoarthritis indication for surgery tended to receive staggered bilateral KA. Compared with 3327 propensity-score matched patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral KA, patients undergoing staggered bilateral KA were associated with a significantly lower incidence of wound infection (odds ratio [OR] ​= ​0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07–0.65), and readmission within 30 days (OR ​= ​0.73; 95%CI, 0.54–0.99) and 90 days (OR ​= ​0.70; 95%CI, 0.55–0.89). However, staggered bilateral KA had higher odds of blood transfusion (OR ​= ​1.20; 95%CI, 1.02–1.40) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR ​= ​2.62; 95%CI, 1.82–3.98). Moreover, staggered bilateral KA can lead to higher costs (108,316.21 Chinese yuan [CNY] vs 103,367.60 CNY) and longer LOS (17.29 days vs 12.18 days) than simultaneous bilateral KA.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that staggered bilateral KA has become more common than simultaneous bilateral KA in China. Compared to simultaneous bilateral KA, staggered bilateral KA was associated with a lower incidence of wound infection and readmission. Staggered bilateral KA may be an alternative for patients who can't tolerate simultaneous surgery.

The translational potential of this article: Our study indicates that staggered bilateral KA is a safe and economical option for elderly patients who require bilateral KA but are at high clinical risk. The rising proportion of staggered bilateral KA will be a new trend in bilateral KA.

Risk of stroke after unilateral or bilateral TKA (simultaneous and staged without discharge) in 327,438 matched patients using data from the National Health Insurance Claims for South Korea

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of stroke in patients treated with bilateral TKA compared with patients with unilateral TKA.

METHODS

In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we compared patients undergoing unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA using data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2017 and included patients older than 40 years of age who underwent primary TKA by the index date as documented primary diagnosis and first additional diagnosis without a history of stroke during the preceding 1 year. We used matched Cox regression models to compare the incidence rate and risk factors of newly acquired stroke among patients treated with unilateral TKA or bilateral TKA after propensity score (PS) matching.

RESULTS

In the present study, 163,719 patients who received unilateral TKA were matched to 163,719 patients with bilateral TKA based on PS. The risk of stroke during the study period was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.79). Patients who received bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: advanced age (70-79 years, HR 0.76), female sex (HR 0.75), rural area (HR 0.77), small- or medium-sized hospital (HR 0.75), health insurance (HR 0.77), history of hypertension drug use (HR 0.75), congestive heart failure (HR 0.70), connective tissue disease (HR 0.71), diabetes (HR 0.77), and diabetes with complication (HR 0.76).

CONCLUSION

The risk of stroke was lower in patients treated with bilateral TKA than in patients with unilateral TKA. Patients treated with bilateral TKA were at decreased risk of stroke when the following variables were present: age (70-79 years), female sex, health insurance, history of hypertension drug use, and comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure, connective tissue disease, and diabetes.

Staging Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasties Reduces Alignment Outliers

BACKGROUND

Patients frequently present with bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and request simultaneous total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Technical differences between simultaneous and staged TKAs could affect clinical and radiographic outcomes. We hypothesized that staged TKAs would have fewer mechanical alignment outliers than simultaneous TKAs.

METHODS

We reviewed 87 simultaneous and 72 staged TKAs with at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic assessment was done using standing long leg and lateral radiographs of the knee. Coronal and sagittal measurements were performed by 4 blinded observers on 2 separate occasions with an intraobserver agreement of 0.95 and interobserver of 0.92.

RESULTS

The first simultaneous knee had no difference in the probability of establishing the mechanical axis outside 3° of neutral (45%) compared to the first staged knee (54%, P = .337). However, the second simultaneous knee (49%) was more likely to establish the axis outside mechanical neutral compared to the second staged knee (28%; odds ratio 2.54, confidence interval 1.31-4.94, P = .006). There was an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis with staged TKA (odds ratio 2.96, confidence interval 1.28-6.84, P = .011), but other perioperative complication rates were not significantly different. There were no clinically significant differences in range of motion or Knee Society Score.

CONCLUSION

There is a significantly increased risk of establishing the second knee outside mechanical neutral during a simultaneous TKA compared to staged bilateral TKAs, possibly related to a number of surgeon-related and system-related factors. The impact on clinical outcomes and radiographic loosening may become significant in long-term follow-up.

Short Interval Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Safety Compared to Simultaneous and Later Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (sim-BTKA) is reported to be safe in a select group of patients. Patients with symptomatic bilateral knee arthritis who are not candidates for sim-BTKA require staged surgery (stag-BTKA). This study aimed to compare the safety and complications associated with sim-BTKA with stag-BTKA performed at 2 time intervals.

METHODS

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data includes bilateral TKA cases performed between 2001 and 2019. A cohort of sim-BTKA (n = 2728) was compared to a cohort of stag-BTKA (n = 1658). The staged group was subdivided according to the interval between surgeries: ≤90 days (early) and ≥91 days (later). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

In-hospital complication rates were lower in both arms of the stag-BTKA groups vs the sim-BTKA. The sim-BTKA group had higher odds ratio of anemia, electrolyte disturbances, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory, urinary, gastrointestinal, and neurological complications. Lower rates of all-cause revision were found in stag-BTKA vs sim-BTKA groups. There was a trend toward revision due to deep infection when increasing the interim before the second stag-BTKA procedure. No differences in complication rates after the second surgery were detected between the early and later stag-BTKA.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that sim-BTKA is associated with more complications and revisions when compared to stag-BTKA. Performing the second-stage TKA at 90 days or less after the first TKA is not associated with increased risk of complications. Performing sim-BTKA, simply for convenience, is not warranted and should be reserved for a select group of patient matching specific criteria.

Comparison of the Effect and Complications of Sequential Bilateral Arthroplasty at Different Time Intervals and Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

To the authors' knowledge, there is no current consensus regarding the optimal interprocedural interval for patients who have undergone bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate complication rates and functional outcome in patients who have undergone BTKA (simultaneous or sequential at different time intervals), and to determine an optimal time frame for the second knee.

METHODS

Data from 315 patients who were able to tolerate simultaneous BTKA according to the anaesthesiologist's preoperative assessment between 2016 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. According to the operative time interval, they were divided into simultaneous, ≤ 1-month sequential, 1- to 3-month sequential, and ≥ 3-month sequential BTKA groups. The primary outcomes were revision and readmission rates during the follow-up period, and the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), transfusion and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the implant survival or readmission rate between the groups (p > 0.05). Multivariable linear regression showed that interprocedural interval and body mass index (BMI) affected LOS; the LOS of simultaneous BTKA was the shortest (p < 0.05). BMI was associated with an increased LOS of 0.25 days (95% CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03). A modified Poisson regression model showed that the odds of blood transfusion were reduced in sequential BTKAs of any interval (p < 0.05), and preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) was also a risk factor (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p < 0.001). The interprocedural interval was not a risk factor for postoperative cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications.

CONCLUSION

For appropriate patients, simultaneous BTKA is beneficial. However, higher preoperative haemoglobin was required to mitigate the high blood transfusion rate associated with simultaneous surgeries. If suitable patients refuse simultaneous BTKA for other non-medical reasons, sequential BTKA with an interval greater than 1 month is recommended.

The Safety of Bilateral Simultaneous Hip and Knee Arthroplasty versus Staged Arthroplasty in a High-Volume Center Comparing Blood Loss, Peri- and Postoperative Complications, and Early Functional Outcome

Purpose: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of simultaneous hip and knee arthroplasty compared to staged procedures in patients with bilateral pathology. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous and staged hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with bilateral pathology by assessing the transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin drop, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications, 30-day readmissions and early functional outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA, THA and UKA by a single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center between 2015 and 2020 as simultaneous or staged procedures. Staged bilateral arthroplasties were performed within 12 months and were stratified by the time between procedures. Data were acquired through the electronic files at the Orthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM). For functional outcome, the ability of the patients to walk independently on the ward was compared with the ability to walk a set of stairs alone, which was recorded daily by the attending physiotherapist. Results: In total n = 305 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this study. One hundred and forty-five patients were allocated to the staged arthroplasty group. This group was subdivided into a hip and a knee group, whereas the knee group was split into TKA and UKA. The second staged procedure was performed within 12 months of the first procedure. One hundred and sixty patients were allocated to the simultaneous arthroplasty group. This group was also subdivided into a hip and knee group, whereas the knee group was split again into a TKA and UKA group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or complication rate. Secondarily, no statistically significant difference was found between the postoperative hemoglobin drop and the functional outcome, or in the length of stay (LOS) between both groups. Walking the stairs showed a significant difference in the knee group. Conclusions: There were no significant differences observed in the transfusion rate in-hospital complications, or readmission rate between both groups. The early functional outcome showed no significant difference in mobility for all groups. Simultaneous arthroplasty for knee or hip is as safe as a staged procedure, with no higher risk for the patient, in a specialized high-volume center. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Comparison of functional outcome of simultaneous and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty : systematic review of literature

Safety of simultaneous bilateral TKA (simBTKA) and staged BTKA (staBTKA) have been compared in previous systematic reviews but functional outcome remains neglected aspect of the debate. We performed a systematic review of contemporary literature to compare the functional outcome of simBTKA and staBTKA. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Database to identify all articles published between 2000 and July 2020 that evaluated the outcome of patients undergoing BTKA either in simultaneous or staged manner. Ten articles were identified which met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcome was reported in terms of Knee Society score (KSS), range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Western Ontario and McMaster University score (WOMAC) in seven, five, four and two studies respectively. KSS gained on average 66.6 points (47.5-95.3) for simBTKA and 65.1 points (44.4-97.2) for staBTKA without significant difference between two groups. There was no difference in post-operative ROM (maximum post-operative flexion being 124.4 and 125.1 for simBTKA and staBTKA groups respectively). Mean improvement in OKS ranged from 20 to 32.6 for simBTKA and 21.6 to 33.1 for staBTKA. There was moderate evidence to suggest that both simultaneous BTKA and staged BTKA produce equivalent improvement in functional scores.

Association of Social Behaviors With Community Discharge in Patients with Total Hip and Knee Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Understand the association between social determinants of health and community discharge after elective total joint arthroplasty.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort design using Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 38 hospital networks and 18 non-network hospitals in the United States; 79,725 patients with total hip arthroplasty and 136,070 patients with total knee arthroplasty between 2011 and 2018.

METHODS

Logistic regression models were used to examine the association among pain, weight status, smoking status, alcohol use, substance disorder, and postsurgical community discharge, adjusted for patient demographics.

RESULTS

Mean ages for patients with hip and knee arthroplasty were 64.5 (SD 11.3) and 65.9 (SD 9.6) years; most patients were women (53.6%, 60.2%), respectively. The unadjusted community discharge rate was 82.8% after hip and 81.1% after knee arthroplasty. After adjusting for demographics, clinical factors, and behavioral factors, we found obesity [hip: odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.85; knee: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77], current smoking (hip: OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.88; knee: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95), and history of substance use disorder (hip: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.50-0.60; knee: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.53-0.62) were associated with lower odds of community discharge after hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Social determinants of health are associated with odds of community discharge after total hip and knee joint arthroplasty. Our findings demonstrate the value of using electronic health record data to analyze more granular patient factors associated with patient discharge location after total joint arthroplasty. Although bundled payment is increasing community discharge rates, post-acute care facilities must be prepared to manage more complex patients because odds of community discharge are diminished in those who are obese, smoking, or have a history of substance use disorder.

Does Body Mass Index Cause a Clinical Difference in Simultaneous Bilateral and Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty?

This study aims to investigate clinical and functional factors in patients undergoing unilateral and simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) who were classified into subgroups of nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese, and to determine perioperative and postoperative complications. We conducted an evaluation of 489 nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients who underwent TKA due to primary knee osteoarthritis between January 2006 and December 2013. The arthroplasties were performed by three different surgeons. Patients who underwent unilateral (group 1) or simultaneous bilateral (group 2) TKAs were divided into subgroups in accordance with BMI levels, that is, (a) nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m²), (b) obese (BMI = 30-34.9 kg/m²), and (c) morbidly obese (BMI ≥35 kg/m²). Clinical and functional assessments were performed using Knee Society Scores (KSSs), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM) values. Perioperative and early postoperative complications were assessed. The mean follow-up period was 46.65 months (minimum: 24 months; maximum: 84 months). There were no significant differences between the patients undergoing unilateral or simultaneous bilateral TKA procedures regarding postoperative ROM, WOMAC indices, and KSSs (p > 0.05), except for morbidly obese patients. Most intraoperative and early postoperative complications occurred in the morbidly obese group, especially in those undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA procedures (p < 0.001). Unilateral and simultaneous bilateral TKA procedures showed no differences regarding ROM, clinical scores, and perioperative and early postoperative complications in nonobese and obese patients. A moderate increase was detected in complication rates in the unilateral TKA morbidly obese patients (group 1c); however, morbidly obese patients constituted the major risk group in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients (group 2c) regarding clinical scores (lower WOMAC scores and KSSs) and the development of complications.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Becomes Safer after Institution of Optimal Perioperative Management: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) increases the rates of procedure-related complications and mortality compared with unilateral TKA. There are no well-defined guidelines for selecting patients to avoid mortality and proposing an upgrade treatment to decrease complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate whether optimal perioperative management could improve the safety of SBTKA. From 2005 to 2017, 1,166 cases of SBTKA were identified from 14,209 TKA procedures. We retrospectively examined the SBTKA patients' demographics, comorbidity profiles, procedure-related complications, and perioperative management during two time periods. Optimal perioperative workup for managing SBTKA significantly decreased the incidences of major complication from 6.2 to 2.4% (p = 0.001) and minor complications from 28.9 to 21.5% (p = 0.004) during period I and period II, respectively. The efficiency of less tourniquet use along with intraarticular tranexamic acid injection was demonstrated by the decreases of hemoglobin (Hb) change in the first 2 days after surgery (p = 0.005) and blood transfusion requirement (p = 0.035) during the SBTKA. Furthermore, the less tourniquet use group had less thigh pain (visual analog scale decreased from 6.0 to 4.2, p = 0.003), shorter duration of hospital stay (decreased from 7.8 to 7.1, p < 0.001), and lower coagulation time (decrease from 3.5 to 2.9, p < 0.001) than the routine tourniquet use group. Patient's screening must be performed carefully for cardiopulmonary compromise in patients aged >80 years and with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3. Additionally, hospitalists should consider developing methods for the eligibility, testing, and perioperative monitoring of patients who undergo SBTKA with the aim of avoiding complications and improving outcomes.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Shorter Length of Stay but Increased Mortality Compared With Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with high patient satisfaction. However, controversy remains regarding the safety and efficacy of conducting simultaneous bilateral (simBTKA) versus staged bilateral TKA (staBTKA). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for simBTKA versus staBTKA and compare clinical outcomes including mortality, complications and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A search was performed of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane central databases between January 2000 and March 2020. Search terms included "simultaneous," "staged," and "bilateral TKA." Inclusion criteria comprised studies comparing outcomes of simBTKA versus staBTKA. Quality of included studies was assessed and meta-analyses of pooled data was conducted.

RESULTS

29 articles published between 2001 and 2020 were included in qualitative synthesis from 927 potentially relevant titles, comprising 257,284 patients. 104,207 patients underwent simBTKA and 153,632 patients underwent staBTKA. simBTKA was associated with significantly increased 90-day mortality rate (P < .00001, OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.79-2.81), increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (P < .00001, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.89), venous thrombosis (P < .00001, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.43), and neurological complications (P = .002, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.77). Incidence of superficial and deep infection was significantly increased with staBTKA (P = .02, P < .00001 respectively). Revision rate within one year was equivocal. Mean LOS was 2.1 days shorter for simBTKA.

CONCLUSION

SimBTKA was associated with decreased incidence of infection and LOS but increased incidence of 90-day mortality, venous thromboembolism and neurological complications. Revision rates were equivocal. Patients should be selected and counseled based on the risks respective to each strategy.

Staged vs simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for clinical outcomes: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be divided into one or two stages clinically. Compared with staged bilateral UKA, whether simultaneous bilateral UKA has better clinical efficacy remains to be verified.

METHODS

PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science were searched by us for meta-analysis. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they included simultaneous and staged UKA. We excluded studies unrelated to the research question, studies in non-selected languages, and studies where the full-text was not available. The data were extracted by two independent investigators, and disagreements were resolved through discussions with a third party. If important data or information about the content of the paper were not available, authors were contacted. Publication bias in studies has been assessed. Meta-analysis was done using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

The systematic review and meta-analysis identified 3370 trials, of which 8 studies (963 patients) compared simultaneous with staged bilateral UKA. The meta-analysis showed that the clinical outcomes of simultaneous bilateral UKA goes down in operating time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -19.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] -22.44 to -16.25, P < .00001), postoperative hemoglobin (Std. mean difference [SMD] = -0.46, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.20, P = .0004), length of stay (LOS) (WMD = -4.73, 95% CI -6.39 to -3.06, P < .00001), hospital cost (SMD = -5.42, 95% CI -6.54 to -4.30, P < .00001). There were no significant difference in blood transfusion, venous thrombosis, infection, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous bilateral UKA can effectively reduce the operating time, LOS, and hospital cost without increasing postoperative complications compared to stage bilateral UKA.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020160056 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Comparing Sequential vs Simultaneous Tourniquet Inflation in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

There is little evidence on outcomes of tourniquet use during bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Tourniquet use in BTKA effects postoperative outcomes and efficiency inside the operating room. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of simultaneous tourniquet inflation in BTKA.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was performed on BTKA patients between March 2013 and May 2018. A total of 285 patients were divided into 2 cohorts. Patients in the simultaneous cohort had concomitant elevation of both tourniquets, but the sequential cohort did not. Perioperative variables were collected, and postoperative complications were tracked for a minimum of 90 days. Patients followed a uniform postoperative protocol. Complications were grouped by category to increase statistical power and compared using a noninferiority test. “Clinically noninferior” was defined as a margin ≤5%.

Results

The simultaneous cohort had significantly (P < .05) higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and smokers. Tourniquet time, delta hemoglobin, and surgical time were significantly lower. For the complication categories of “Any Thrombotic Event”, “Respiratory”, and “Soft Tissue/Wound”, the difference in occurrence rates was no more than 2.8%, 2.8%, and 5.2% between cohorts, respectively. The “Cardiovascular (non-MI)” group was no more than 9.3% different, that is, authors are 95% confident that 3 of 4 complication categories meet the clinically noninferior threshold.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates the noninferiority of simultaneous as compared to sequential tourniquet inflation in BTKA. Patients with cardiac history may need sequential inflation or staged TKA. The information presented in the study assists surgeons in safely and efficiently performing BTKA.

Staggered bilateral total knee arthroplasty during a single hospitalization: is it still an option? a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Bilateral knee osteoarthritis requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be addressed simultaneously in one surgical setting, staggered a few days apart during a single hospitalization, or staged several weeks to months apart. Several studies have reported on the complications and clinical outcomes of staggered bilateral TKA (BTKA) in a single hospitalization. However, there is no consensus regarding the safety and efficacy of this practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature, utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and identifying articles that reported the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications following staggered BTKA.

RESULTS

Overall, six articles were included for analysis, including 43,892 patients in total. Females (n = 25,931; 59% of all patients) outnumbered males (n = 17,961; 40.1% of all patients), and most patients were middle-aged or elderly (mean age: 68.0 years). The majority of studies (83%) used a 1-week interval as the maximum time for single-hospitalization staggered BTKA. Five studies (83%) reported no difference in mortality rates between staggered, simultaneous, or staged BTKA. Compared to staged BTKA, staggered BTKA conferred an increased rate of blood transfusions. There was no consensus that staggered BTKA led to reduced complications rates, compared to simultaneous or staged BTKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-hospitalization staggered BTKA does not appear to be safer than the well-established simultaneous or staged procedures. Overall, the data suggest that staggered BTKA will continue to decline in utilization, as staggered BTKA does not appear to yield clinical advantage over simultaneous BTKA in a medically appropriate patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: systematic review (lowest level of studies included).

Same-day Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Did Not Increase 90-day Hospital Returns

PURPOSE

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed in patients with bilateral knee arthritis. Outside of nationwide database studies, which have limitations, few studies have compared outcomes for same-day versus staged TKA. We sought to compare patient outcomes at a single tertiary referral center.

METHODS

The institutional database was queried from March 2014 to December 2017 for primary TKA. Patients undergoing bilateral procedures were stratified by same-day versus staged; length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, and 90-day readmissions were examined through univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients were evaluated (113 same-day and 563 staged bilateral TKA patients) with mean age 66.0 (8.5) at first surgery and 292.1 (241.6) days between staged procedures. Same-day bilateral TKA patients were younger (p < 0.001), had lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.010), and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (p = 0.030). They were more likely to have a prolonged LOS (p < 0.001) and be discharged to skilled nursing facility or rehab facility (p < 0.001). Total LOS for separate hospitalizations in staged procedures was greater than LOS for same-day bilateral TKAs (p < 0.001). There was no difference in 90-day ED visits (p = 0.623) or readmission (p = 0.286). In a multivariable model controlling for age, BMI, and ASA score, same-day bilateral TKA was not significantly associated with ED visits or readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing same-day bilateral TKAs were more likely to be discharged to post-acute care facilities, however they did not have increased 90-day readmissions.

Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Postoperative Complications Following Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

For patients who qualify, simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a viable option for the treatment of bilateral symptoms. However, the incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been steadily rising over the past few decades and may impact those who qualify as candidates for bilateral TKA. As such, the aim of this study was to determine the impact of COPD on postoperative outcomes in patients who receive simultaneous bilateral TKA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing data provided through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. All patients who had undergone simultaneous bilateral TKA between 2007 and 2016 were identified and further stratified into groups based upon the COPD status. Incidence of adverse events after TKA in the acute postoperative period was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. COPD was found to be an independent risk factor for the development of major (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; p = 0.015), renal (OR: 5.1; p = 0.02), and thromboembolic complications (OR: 2.5; p = 0.027). In addition, patients with COPD were at increased risk for having an extended hospital length of stay (LOS; p < 0.001) and development of urinary tract infections (p < 0.001). Patients with COPD are at higher risk for development of overall major complications, as well as renal and thromboembolic complications after simultaneous bilateral TKA. Interestingly, patients were not at increased risk for the development of pulmonary or wound complications. When considering a staged versus simultaneous bilateral TKA, surgeons should be aware of the impact COPD status has on the postoperative complication rate.

One stage bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement: Similar early clinical outcome with shorter rehabilitation and better resources utilization compared with two stage

Introduction:

There are a lot of debates on the advantages and safety profile of one stage bilateral knee arthroplasty. Most of the studies focus on total knee replacement, and it may not be applied directly to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). We would like to compare the early results of one and two stage bilateral UKR in our center.

Methods:

This is a retrospective review of all the bilateral medial UKR done in our center in 2018–2019. Patients’ demographic data, operative time, postoperative blood, length of stay (LOS) and complications were recorded. The number of admissions, pre-operative assessment sessions (PAS), and weeks of post-operative physiotherapy were analyzed. Clinical outcome was measured by Knee society knee score and range of motion (ROM).

Results:

Our center performed 97 UKR in 2018–2019, with 50 UKR performed in 25 patients, among which 16 received one stage while 9 received two stage bilateral UKR. Both groups had similar mean age, BMI, sex ratio, ASA grading, pre-operative knee score and ROM. Patient in the one stage group required only 1 PAS/admission/operation to treat both knees with a mean LOS of 7.3 days and 7.8 weeks of physiotherapy, while those in the two stage group required 2 PAS/admissions/operations with a mean cumulative LOS of 9.8 days and 14.1 weeks of physiotherapy. The mean cumulative operative time was similar for both groups but the one stage group only required 1 operative session. There was no difference in blood loss and there was no transfusion or complication. The post-operative knee score and ROM at 3 and 6 months were similar for both groups.

Conclusion:

In suitable patients with bilateral medial OA knee, one stage bilateral UKR offers simliar early clinical outcome with shorter rehabilitation duration but without increasing complications compared with two stage. Resources can therefore be better utilized.

Risk of chronic opioid use after simultaneous versus staged bilateral knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Several studies have identified excess risk associated with undergoing simultaneous (compared with unilateral or staged) bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). However, few have addressed subsequent chronic opioid use. Given the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with prolonged opioid use, we evaluated the incidence of postoperative chronic opioid use following simultaneous versus staged BTKA, based on the different timing strategies of staged procedures.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent BTKA procedures (2012-2016; Truven Health MarketScan; n=14 407) were classified as having undergone simultaneous or staged BTKA (<3 months, 3-6 months or 6-12 months apart). Outcomes were postoperative chronic opioid use and oral morphine equivalents prescribed on discharge. Multivariable regression models measured associations between type/timing of BTKA and outcomes. ORs and 95% CIs were reported.

RESULTS

Unadjusted frequency of chronic opioid use did not differ between groups, (Simultaneous: 11.3%, staged <3 months: 10.7%, staged 3-6 months: 11.7%, staged >6 months: 10.2%; p=0.247). In an adjusted model, there was no significant difference in the odds of becoming chronic opioid users between staged and simultaneous BTKA (staged <3 months OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.21/staged 3-6 months OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.12/staged >6 months OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.13; p=0.755). Patients undergoing staged BTKAs <6 months apart (compared with simultaneous) were prescribed slightly greater oral morphine equivalents on hospital discharge (staged <3 months 6% increase, 95% CI 3% to 10%; staged 3-6 months 4%, 95% CI 1% to 8%; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Although patients undergoing staged BTKA <6 months apart were prescribed greater quantities of opioids on discharge, there was no significant difference in the odds of postoperative chronic opioid use compared with simultaneous BTKA. The timing of BTKA procedures does not appear to influence the likelihood of postoperative chronic opioid dependence.

Comparison of early post-operative complications following unilateral or single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) demonstrates excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction with low complication rates for single compartment knee arthritis. For patients with bilateral symptoms, single-stage bilateral UKA (SSBUKA) provides an alternative to staged procedures but may risk increased blood loss and systemic complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare 90-day postoperative complications between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA without exclusion for comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed for 555 consecutive patients having undergone UKA (317 unilateral and 238 bilateral). Data collection included patient demographics and 90-day complications. Independent t-tests (continuous) and Fishers' Exact tests (nominal) were performed to determine differences between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA patients.

RESULTS

The SSBUKA group had more male patients than the unilateral group (51.3% and 43.8%, respectively). There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidity classification. More SSBUKA patients experienced nausea than unilateral patients (17.6% and 11.0%), however, no significant differences were observed in the overall incidence of wound or systemic complications, and no transfusions were required. Significantly more unilateral patients (96.2%) were discharged home compared to SSBUKA (63.0%) (p < 0.001). Two SSBUKA (1.7%) and two unilateral UKA (0.6%) patients required readmission within 90-days with systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SSBUKA did not increase the risk of early postoperative systemic or wound complications, when performed in all patients with symptomatic disease without exclusion criteria as compared to patients undergoing unilateral UKA. Therefore, SSBUKA can safely be performed on the majority of patients who present to experienced high volume community hospitals.

Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: Simultaneous versus staging in the same or in twice hospitalization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Arthroplasty is the main treatment in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. In bilateral lesions, it is frequently performed in two simultaneous or separate surgical procedures. In this regard, the present study aimed to compare the results of knee arthroplasty in two joints simultaneously at two different times.

METHOD

In general, all 40-70 years old patients in need of complete bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) were enrolled in this descriptive cross-sectional study during 2009-2016. They were included in three groups of BTKA as simultaneously (n = 272), staging in the same hospitalization (146), and staging in different hospitalizations (245). To assess the quantitative and qualitative function of the knees, patients' knees were evaluated before the surgery, and one month, three months, and two years after the surgery using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Finally, hospitalization time, anesthesia duration, and medical costs were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Based on the results, knee function improved based on WOMAC and KSS scales in all groups after arthroplasty although no significant differences were observed between the three groups. Patients' satisfaction in simultaneous BTKA was significantly higher compared to the other two groups (P = 0.013). Eventually, complications demonstrated no significant differences between the three groups except for pulmonary and cerebral embolism which were more prevalent in old patients with a high body mass index in the simultaneous BTKA group (P = 0.035 and P = 0.043, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, simultaneous BTKA is a useful approach for reducing costs while increasing patients' function and satisfaction although it has certain complications such as embolism in older overweight patients.

Safety of one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty -one surgeon sequential vs. two surgeons simultaneous: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the complications by comparing two surgeons simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (two-surgeon bilateral TKA) to one surgeon sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty (single-surgeon bilateral TKA).

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six participants were prospectively randomized into two groups: two-surgeon bilateral TKA and single-surgeon bilateral TKA. While two surgeons performed simultaneous total knee arthroplasty in the two-surgeon bilateral TKA group, one surgeon performed sequentially in the single-surgeon bilateral TKA group. Ninety-day major, and minor complications rate, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and patient-reported outcome measures were analysed.

RESULTS

The two surgeons operated in two-surgeon bilateral TKA group 246 knees in 123 patients, while the single surgeon operated in single-surgeon bilateral TKA group 246 knees of 123 patients. The median operating time was 120 (range 70-151) minutes in the two-surgeon bilateral TKA group and 140 (range 75-190) minutes in the single-surgeon bilateral TKA group (p < 0.001). The median EBL was higher in the two-surgeon bilateral TKA group (p < 0.001). The 90-day complications were two major complications (1.6%) in the two-surgeon bilateral TKA group and 11 (8.9%) in the single-surgeon bilateral TKA group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Two-surgeon simultaneous bilateral TKA is a safe method with lower complication rates compared with single-surgeon sequential bilateral TKA and can be preferred for experienced teams. However, peri- and post-operative care is required to decrease the risk of bleeding, particularly in patients undergoing two-surgeon simultaneous bilateral TKA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered in a public trials registry ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , NCT04299516).

One-Surgeon vs Two-Surgeon Single-Anesthetic Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Revision and Mortality Rates From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Outcomes following 1-surgeon single-anesthetic sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty (seq-BTKA) compared to 2-surgeon single-anesthetic simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (sim-BTKA) are largely unknown. The current study compared revision rates and all-cause mortality following seq-BTKA vs sim-BTKA using data from the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

METHODS

Seq-BTKA and sim-BTKA procedures recorded within the registry between September 1, 1999 and December 31, 2018 were analyzed for subsequent revision and patient mortality. Cumulative percent revision and cumulative percent survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Revision and mortality rates for sim-BTKA and seq-BTKA were compared using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and gender.

RESULTS

Included in the analysis were 27,480 seq-BTKAs and 471 sim-BTKAs. There was no difference in the cumulative percent revision between the 2 groups (hazard ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.85). Cumulative percent patient survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.54).

CONCLUSION

Revision rates and mortality were similar for seq-BTKA and sim-BTKA. Investigation of additional outcomes such as complications not requiring revision, pain, function, and cost is required to comprehensively understand the relative merits of each procedure.

Simultaneous single-stage versus two-staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study

PURPOSE

The study aims to prospectively compare peri-operative morbidity and mortality of simultaneous single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SS BLTKA) with two-staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TS BLTKA) performed within 12 months of the first surgery. We hypothesized that SS BLTKA is as safe as TS BLTKA.

METHODS

Patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this study. Oxford knee score and quality of life index SF12 was compared between the 2 groups at six weeks and six month follow-up.

RESULTS

SS BLTKA included 250 patients and TS BLTKA included 210 patients. The minimum time interval between two operations was three weeks (mean 1.6 months, range 3 weeks-12 months). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in peri-operative mortality, surgical site infection, major peri-operative complications. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the Oxford knee score and quality of life index SF12 at 6-month follow-up. There was no difference in the range of knee flexion between the 2 groups at six months. Post-operative haemoglobin drop was significantly more in SS BLTKA patients and consequently, blood transfusion requirement was significantly higher in SS BLTKA. There was a significantly higher length of hospital stay and duration of surgery in TS BLTKA group.

CONCLUSION

There does not appear to be a difference in complication rates between the 2 groups. SS BLTKA seems to be a logical choice if both knees have severe osteoarthritis. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary compromise were excluded, and a unilateral procedure may be preferred in them.

Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell injection in subchondral lesions of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study versus contralateral arthroplasty at a mean fifteen year follow-up

PURPOSE

Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been proposed as potential treatment modalities for knee osteoarthritis. However, indications and long-term results have not been frequently reported. The purpose of this study was to determine whether bone marrow lesion on MRI are predictive of risk progression to total knee arthroplasty during the first ten years after subchondral cell therapy.

METHODS

This study included 140 adults aged 65 to 90 years. These 140 patients (mean age 75.4 ± 14.2 years) planned to undergo staged-bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for medial osteoarthritis, had "comparable" pain in both knees, and accepted randomization of the knees for surgery. They received TKA on one side and a subchondral injection of MSCs (from iliac bone marrow concentrate) on the contralateral knee during the same anaesthetic. The bone marrow graft of 20 cm³ volume (10 cc in the tibia and 10 cc in the femur) contained average 7800 MSCs/mL (range 3120 to 11,560). The baseline volume of bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on the tibia and on the femoral condyle determined on MRI was average 3.4 cm³ (range 0.4 to 6.4 cm³). The risk of subsequent knee arthroplasty due to absence of bone marrow lesions regression as well as osteoarthritis (OA) grade was evaluated with Cox proportional-hazards ratio after control of baseline variables (number of cells injected, age, knee alignment).

RESULTS

After treatment with MSCs injection in bone marrow lesions of the subchondral bone, medial femorotibial compartment BML volume experienced regression over 24 months (mean regression 1.5 cm³, range 0.8 to 3.2 cm³). At the most recent follow up (average of 15 years, range 10 to 20 years), a total of 25 (18%) of the 140 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty performed at a mean of ten years (range, 5 to 15 years) after the date of the cell therapy. The overall incidence of knee arthroplasty after cell therapy was 1.19% per person-year which was equivalent to the risk of a revision for a primary TKA in the contralateral knees of the same patient population (21 revisions, corresponding to 1.00% revision per person-year; p = 0.34). After adjusting for confounders, persistent BMLs larger than 3 cm³ after cell therapy was a strong independent risk factor for total knee arthroplasty (hazard ratio HR = 4.42 [95% CI = 2.34 to 7.21]; p < 0.001), regardless of OA grade, with higher risks demonstrated for larger BMLs. Incidence rates of arthroplasty were also higher for young patients and for knees presenting severe malalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that subchondral bone marrow concentrate (as compared with TKA) had a sufficient effect on pain to postpone or avoid the TKA in the contra lateral joint of patients with bilateral osteoarthritis. Bone marrow lesions were predictive factors for future knee arthroplasty in the knee with subchondral cell therapy at ten years follow-up.

One-stage versus 2-stage bilateral total joint arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

Background

Patients with bilateral end-stage hip or knee arthritis want to know if it is safe to have bilateral surgery under a single anesthetic, to restore their quality of life as quickly as possible. The purpose of this study was to assess if there is an increase in the rate of postoperative medical adverse events, length of stay (LOS), blood transfusion rate and 30-day readmission rate among patients who undergo 1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (BTHA) and 1-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) compared with patients who undergo 2-stage BTHA and BTKA.

Methods

Our study cohorts included patients who underwent BTHA and BTKA between Apr. 1, 2009, and Jan. 31, 2016, in Alberta, Canada. To minimize selection bias associated with our retrospective study design, we matched patients who underwent 1-stage BTHA and BTKA with patients with patients who underwent 2-stage BTHA and BTKA, respectively, for age, sex and number of presurgical risk factors using propensity score in a matching ratio of 1:1.

Results

Our study included 1645 patients who underwent BTHA and 4125 patients who underwent BTKA. We matched 195 patients who underwent 1-stage BTHA and 302 patients who underwent 1-stage BTKA with patients who underwent 2-stage BTHA and BTKA, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative medical adverse events between the 1-stage and 2-stage matched cohort groups for both BTHA (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.9) and BTKA (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.6). There was no difference in inpatient, 30- or 90-day mortality between the 2 groups for BTHA or BTKA. Patients who underwent 1-stage BTHA and BTKA had a shorter acute length of stay but increased total length of stay (acute care and rehabilitation unit) and were less likely to be discharged home postoperatively. One-stage BTHA and BTKA were associated with higher odds of blood transfusion than 2-stage BTHA and BTKA. The 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower for 1-stage BTHA than for the 2-stage BTHA matched cohort (adjusted OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), whereas there was no difference in the 30-day readmission rate (adjusted OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.7) between the 1-stage and 2-stage BTKA matched cohorts. Finally, operating room time was significantly lower for 1-stage BTHA (49.6 min less) and 1-stage BTKA (66.7 min less) than for the 2-stage arthroplasty procedures.

Conclusion

Healthy patients who undergo 1-stage BTHA and BTKA have postoperative medical complication rates comparable to those of patients who undergo 2-stage procedures with the additional benefits of a shorter acute length of stay, but they do have a higher risk of blood transfusion and are less likely to be discharged directly home from the acute care hospital. A multicentre randomized controlled trial on this topic is currently being condcuted by the Canadian Arthroplasty Society.

Comparison of simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total knee replacement on pain levels and functional recovery

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacement is a common operative procedure to improve pain, function, and quality of life in patients with end stage knee osteoarthritis. The current study aimed to compare simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total knee replacement on pain intensity and recovery of function.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients (bilateral 50, unilateral 30) aged 63.28 (9.4) years undergone total knee replacement participated in the current study. The participants were admitted for 5-7 days in the hospital. Participants in both the group received similar inpatient and outpatient physiotherapy sessions. Pain intensity and function capacity were assessed at baseline, day 7, and day 30 postoperatively using visual analogue scale and lower extremity functional scale, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant reduction of pain intensity (Day 0, mean 8.9, SD 1.0; Day 30, mean 2.2, SD 1.3 in bilateral total knee replacement; Day 0, mean 8.8, SD 1.1; Day 30, mean 2.0, SD 1.5 in unilateral total knee replacement; p < 0.001) and improvement in the functional capacity (Day 0, mean 16.2, SD 10.1; Day 30, mean 55.6, SD 14.6 in bilateral total knee replacement; Day 0, mean 19.1, SD 9.1; Day 30, mean 56.7, SD 15.8 in unilateral total knee replacement; p < 0.001) following total knee replacement at 30 days post-operatively. However, there was a non-significant difference noted between bilateral versus unilateral total knee replacement on the reduction of pain intensity (mean changes, 6.9 versus 6.8) and improvement in the functional capacity (mean changes, 39.4 versus 37.6) at 30 days post-operatively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement was associated with a similar reduction of pain intensity and recovery of function compared to unilateral total knee replacement, suggesting the use of simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis since its costs and rehabilitation process could be reduced compared to staged bilateral total knee replacement.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Increased Risk of Recurring Complications

BACKGROUND

As the demand for knee arthroplasty increases, risk assessment and counseling are critical for optimal patient outcomes perioperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific complications occurring after unilateral knee replacement predict the risk of recurrence after a staged replacement of the contralateral knee for patients with bilateral symptomatic disease.

METHODS

Linked, nationwide data from the U.S. Hospital Cost and Utilization Project from 2005 to 2014 were used to measure the occurrence of complications after the first and second procedures in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Odds ratios (ORs) and conditional probabilities were determined to assess whether having a specific complication after the first TKA increased the chance that the same complication occurred after the second procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 36,278 patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs were analyzed. All complications occurring after the first arthroplasty were associated with both a significantly increased probability and odds of recurrence following the second arthroplasty. These included myocardial infarction (OR, 56.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.04 to 155.44]; p < 0.001), ischemic stroke (OR, 41.38 [95% CI, 1.98 to 275.82]; p = 0.03), other cardiac complications (OR, 7.73 [95% CI, 4.24 to 14.11]; p < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR, 8.58 [95% CI, 2.85 to 23.17]; p = 0.002), urinary complications (OR, 11.19 [95% CI, 5.44 to 22.25]; p = 0.001), hematoma (OR, 15.05 [95% CI, 7.90 to 27.27]; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 7.40 [95% CI, 5.37 to 10.08]; p < 0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR, 11.00 [95% CI, 5.01 to 23.92]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical complications that occur postoperatively after TKA are associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence of these complications after staged replacement of the contralateral knee. Although overall complication rates remain low, patients who develop these medical complications after the first replacement should be counseled on their increased risk profile prior to the contralateral surgical procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

One-Stage Sequential Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Effective Treatment for Advanced Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis Providing High Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The mortality and risks of bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) have been reported to be far greater than in unilateral total knee arthroplasty (UTKA). This study aimed to determine whether this remains the case using contemporary anesthetic and surgical techniques for one-stage single anesthetic sequential BTKA.

METHODS

Two cohorts of 394 patients were created by propensity matching for gender, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and Veterans Rand-12 health survey scores. Primary outcome was morbidity and mortality, with satisfaction measures using patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

The mortality rate was low with one case after BTKA. Major complications were also low; however, a pulmonary embolism rate of 2% in BTKA patients was significantly higher than 0.3% after UTKA (P < .05), and associated with an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥3. The rate of minor complications between the 2 cohorts was comparable (P = .95). Blood transfusions were uncommon and not significantly different between cohorts (2.5% vs 1.3%, P = .3). BTKA patients stayed in hospital a mean 1.3 days longer with greater rehabilitation requirements. At final follow-up, patient satisfaction was high with all patient-reported outcome measures significantly improved and comparable between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

BTKA is safe and effective in the majority of patients. Transfusion rates were far lower than historically reported and major complications were rare after both UTKA and BTKA. A significant increase in the rate of pulmonary embolism after BTKA was observed, especially in high risk patients. At minimum 1-year postoperatively, cohorts had the same significant clinical improvement and high level of satisfaction.

Bilateral Simultaneous vs Staged Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Difference in Perioperative Risks

BACKGROUND

With the rising utilization of total joint arthroplasty, the role of simultaneous-bilateral surgery will have an expanding impact. The purpose of this study is to examine the risks of perioperative complications with this approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to inform shared decision-making.

METHODS

We reviewed national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2014 to compare outcomes between simultaneous-bilateral TKAs (sim-BTKAs) and staged-bilateral TKAs (staged-BTKAs). Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounders. Outcomes analyzed included mortality, various medical complications, knee infection, and mechanical complications.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 27,301 sim-BTKAs and 45,419 staged-BTKAs. Patients who underwent simultaneous surgery had a statistically significant higher adjusted odds of mortality, cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and complications involving the urinary and digestive systems, and a lower adjusted odds of deep knee infection and hematoma. Thirteen of the 14 complications had overall incidences less than 2% and 1 outcome had an incidence of 3%. The absolute between-group risk difference for any complication was 1% or less.

CONCLUSION

Sim-BTKAs have a statistically significant increased odds of multiple complications compared to staged-BTKAs. However, the absolute risk differences between these options are minimal and the occurrence of any complication is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement improves gait parameters in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) can provide reliable clinical and functional outcomes when performed simultaneously in both knees for treating bilateral osteoarthritis (OA). No studies to date have evaluated gait pattern after simultaneous bilateral UKR. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in gait variables after bilateral single-stage UKR (B-UKR) and to compare them with the outcomes after unilateral UKR in two other groups of patients: one with bilateral knee OA (P-UKR) and one with the contralateral knee unaffected (H-UKR).

METHODS

Three-dimensional motion cohort data were prospectively collected before and six months after surgery; 37 were allocated to the B-UKR (n = 13), P-UKR (n = 12) or H-UKR (n = 12) group. Spatiotemporal variables (stride length, gait speed, gait cadence, stance phase, swing phase, and double support phase) and kinematic parameters (knee flexion and extension peak values, knee range of motion (ROM), and hip abduction peak value) were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA). The magnitude of effect for significant outcomes (ES) was determined using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

Postoperative improvement in gait cadence (P < 0.01; ES = 1.20), walking speed (P < 0.05; ES = 0.58), stride length (P < 0.05; ES = 0.67), knee ROM (P < 0.05; ES = 0.89), knee flexion (P < 0.05; ES = 0.94), and hip abduction (P < 0.001; ES = 1.16) was noted for the B-UKR group, whereas only stride length improved (P < 0.05; ES = 0.48) for the H-UKR group, and no changes in any gait parameter were seen for the P-UKR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative improvement in gait parameters was observed in the B-UKR patients with bilateral OA. Whenever possible, simultaneous bilateral UKR should be considered in such patients.

Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: one stage or two stages?

BACKGROUND

Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may be performed as one- or two-stage procedure. Previous reports suggest that UKA provides a more rapid functional recovery than total knee arthroplasty. However, little data exist on whether bilateral UKA can be performed without increasing the perioperative risk compared with unilateral cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 51 patients treated between January 2014 and March 2017 with single-stage UKA (group A) with 51 patients who underwent unilateral procedure (group B) to evaluate perioperative complications. We noted no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age and body mass index.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent single-stage bilateral UKA had longer operating room time with respect to single procedure (93.2 min vs. 50.7 min). However, the bilateral group had a shorter cumulative operating room time (93.2 min) compared to the unilateral group (101.5 min) with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Average hemoglobin loss at discharge was 3.1 points for group A and 2.4 for group B, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that bilateral simultaneous UKA does not increase the risk for perioperative complications. Total blood loss at discharge is statistically higher in bilateral UKA rather than unilateral UKA; however, cumulative hemoglobin loss is statistically lower in bilateral group. Patients can benefit from a single hospital admission and anesthetic time, while the shorter total inpatient stay and lower blood loss can reduce hospital costs in cases of bilateral surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Retrospective study.