Bisphosphonates and nonhealing femoral fractures: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and international safety efforts: a systematic review from the Research on Adverse Drug Events And Reports (RADAR) project

Etiological, clinical characteristics, and treatment of atypical femur fracture: A retrospective study

This study aims to determine the etiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of atypical femur fractures (AFFs). Clinical data from patients with an AFF who were treated in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The data were analyzed and summarized. Twenty-one patients (17 females and 4 males; average age, 66.59 ± 13.52 years; age range, 32-85 years) with AFFs (27 femurs [6 bilateral femurs]) were included in the current study. Based on relative risk analysis it was determined that the long-term use of bisphosphonates was a risk factor for AFFs. Using principal components analysis, severe osteoporosis, hip joint dysfunction, and structural abnormalities of the femur were shown to be risk factors for AFFs. Four femurs received non-surgical treatment, of which 2 were cured and the remaining 2 underwent surgical treatment. Twenty-five femurs received surgical treatment, of which 21 had intramedullary nail fixation and 4 had plate fixation. All fractures healed. The etiologic factors for AFFs are complex. Severe osteoporosis, hip joint dysfunction, and structural abnormalities of the femur were shown to be risk factors for AFFs based on principal components analysis. The appropriate treatment will be determined according to the characteristics of the fracture.

Osteoporosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mechanisms Underlying Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation or Factors Associated with Hip Fractures

Osteoporosis is defined as a condition of increased risk of fracture due to decreased bone strength. In developed countries, the number of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures has been increasing in recent years due to the growing elderly population, posing a social challenge not only to fracture patients and their families but also to the social healthcare economy. Osteoporosis can be divided into two categories: primary osteoporosis caused by aging or menopause and secondary osteoporosis caused by metabolic or inflammatory diseases or drugs such as glucocorticoids. The majority of patients have primary osteoporosis, and the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis and factors associated with fragility fractures in the elderly have been elucidated. On the other hand, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the causes of secondary osteoporosis. RA is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and destruction. Most often, treatment focuses on suppressing these symptoms. However, physicians should be aware of the risk of osteoporosis in RA patients, because (1) RA is a chronic inflammatory disease, which itself can be a risk factor for osteoporosis; (2) glucocorticoids, which are sometimes administered to treat RA, can be a risk factor for osteoporosis; and (3) patients with RA are becoming older, and aging is an osteoporosis risk factor. A comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and its fragility fractures requires elucidating the mechanisms underlying osteoclast activation, which drives their development. Furthermore, identifying the factors associated with fragility fractures is essential. This review summarizes the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, the factors associated with fragility fractures, and the associations between RA and osteoporosis development.

Age-stratified analysis of adverse event signals for clarithromycin: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Background

Clarithromycin is a widely used antibiotic, but its safety profile, particularly in different age groups, remains inadequately explored.

Objectives

This study aims to characterize and illustrate the features of clarithromycin-related adverse events (AEs) across different age groups using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, providing a reference for the clinical detection, prevention, and management of AEs in various age groups.

Design

A disproportionality analysis was performed using data from the FAERS database. The study included all AE reports related to clarithromycin, stratified by age groups.

Methods

Disproportionality analysis was conducted using reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multiple gamma Poisson shrinkers. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.

Results

A total of 7319 reports of clarithromycin AEs were retrieved from the FAERS database. Vomiting, diarrhea, drug interactions, and drug interactions were reported most frequently in the age groups 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, and ⩾65 years, respectively. Abnormal product taste, taste disorder, and medication errors related to drug interactions specified in the package insert were the strongest signals in the age groups 0-17, 18-44, 45-64, and ⩾65 years, respectively. A total of 41 Preferred Terms signals were not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert and were mainly associated with psychiatric disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders, among others. Specific signals for age differences were identified, with 18 signals being age-specific, including 3 in children and 15 in elderly individuals.

Conclusion

The safety profile of clarithromycin varies across age groups. In children, it is mainly associated with vomiting, hypersensitivity, and dyspnea, while in adults, psychiatric AEs are more common. In the elderly, clarithromycin should be used cautiously, with attention to drug interactions.

Adverse events associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥65: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

Azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in adults aged ≥ 65, such as mycoplasma pneumonia. This study aims to evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in this age group by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing insights for clinical use and management of AEs in this population.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrieved reports of AEs related to azithromycin and clarithromycin from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS) to identify AEs associated with azithromycin and clarithromycin in adults aged ≥ 65.

RESULTS

A total of 2,019 adverse event reports were retrieved for azithromycin, and 2,392 for clarithromycin. Off-label use (n = 349) and drug interactions (n = 487) were the most reported AEs in adults aged ≥ 65 for azithromycin and clarithromycin, respectively. Prolonged QT interval showed the strongest signal among AEs for azithromycin in this age group. Drug interaction-related medication errors had the strongest signal for clarithromycin. Seven signals not explicitly included in the azithromycin package insert were identified in adults aged ≥ 65. Fourteen signals not explicitly included in the clarithromycin package insert were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults aged ≥ 65, cardiac-related adverse events are more closely associated with azithromycin than with clarithromycin. Conversely, AEs related to drug interactions and psychiatric symptoms are more associated with clarithromycin. Additionally, clinicians should be vigilant regarding AEs not specified in the package inserts. The findings of this study may help optimize the selection of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on patient circumstances and assist clinicians in focusing on relevant AEs for early intervention.

Real-World Large Sample Assessment of Drug-related Dry Eye Risk: Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of drug-related dry eye using real-world data, underscoring the significance of tracing pharmacological etiology for distinct clinical types of dry eye.

METHODS

Analyzing adverse event reports in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to September 2023, we employed disproportionality analysis and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network algorithm. The analysis involved categorizing drugs causing dry eye, assessing risk levels, and conducting segmental assessments based on the time of onset of drug-related dry eye adverse reactions.

RESULTS

In the FAERS database, adverse reactions related to dry eye were linked to 1160 drugs. Disproportionality analysis identified 33 drugs with significant risk, notably in ophthalmic (brimonidine, bimatoprost), oncology (tisotumab vedotin, erdafitinib), and other medications (isotretinoin, oxymetazoline). The top three drugs with the highest risk of drug-related dry eye are isotretinoin (Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) = 6.88), tisotumab vedotin (BCPNN = 6.88), and brimonidine (BCPNN = 6.77). Among different categories of drugs, respiratory medications have the shortest mean onset time for drug-related dry eye, averaging 50.99 days. The prevalence skewed towards females (69.9 %), particularly in menopausal and elderly individuals (45-70 years old, mean age 54.7 ± 18.2). Reports of drug-related dry eye adverse reactions showed an annual increase.

CONCLUSION

Informed clinical decision-making is crucial for preventing drug-related dry eye. Assessing the risk of dry eyes associated with both local and systemic medications helps optimize treatment and provide necessary cautionary information.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of QT interval prolongation and Torsades de Pointes associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients: findings from the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between CDK4/6 inhibitors and QT interval prolongation (QTp) and Torsades de Pointes (TdP) in breast cancer patients.

METHOD

The cases with breast cancer from 2015 to 2022 were extracted from the FDA adverse event database (FARES) and further divided into a CDK4/6 inhibitor group and a positive control group. The associations between CDK4/6 inhibitors and QTp and TdP adverse events were evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC).

RESULTS

A total of 172,266 breast cancer patients were included. A total of 234 QTp/TdP events occurred in the CDK4/6 inhibitor group. Disproportionality analysis revealed that ribociclib was related to QTp/TdP. The ROR was 10.10 (95% 8.56-11.92), and the IC was 2.84 (95% 2.28-3.32). Palbociclib and abemaciclib had no correlation with QTP/TDP events.

CONCLUSION

Based on this real-world pharmacovigilance analysis, this study demonstrated a significant association between ribociclib and QTp/TdP events, which should attract clinical attention. The QT interval was monitored before and after medication. Attention should be given to adjusting the drugson time.

Differences in tissue-level properties as assessed by nano-scratching in patients with and without atypical femur fractures on long-term bisphosphonate therapy: a proof-of-concept pilot study

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are a well-established complication of long-term bisphosphonate (BP) therapy, but their pathogenesis is not fully understood. Although many patients on long-term BP therapy have severe suppression of bone turnover (SSBT), not all such patients experience AFF, even though SSBT is a major contributor to AFF. Accordingly, we evaluated tissue level properties using nano-scratch testing of trans-iliac bone biopsy specimens in 12 women (6 with and 6 without AFF matched for age and race). Nano-scratch data were analyzed using a mixed-model ANOVA with volume-normalized scratch energy as a function of AFF (Yes or No), region (periosteal or endosteal), and a first-order interaction between region and AFF. Tukey post hoc analyses of the differences of least squared means of scratch energy were performed and reported as significant if p<.05. The volume-normalized scratch energy was 10.6% higher in AFF than in non-AFF patients (p=.003) and 17.9 % higher in the periosteal than in the endosteal region (p=.004). The differences in normalized scratch energy are suggestive of a higher hardness of the bone tissue after long-term BP therapy. The results of this study are consistent with other studies in the literature and demonstrate the efficacy of using Nano-Scratch technique to evaluate bone tissue that exhibits SSBT and AFF. Further studies using nano-scratch may help quantify and elucidate underlying mechanisms for the pathogenesis of AFF.

Impact of osteopenia and osteosarcopenia on the outcomes after surgery of hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers

Objective

The purpose of this study is to investigate potential associations between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer (HBPC).

Methods

Three online databases, including Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were thoroughly searched for literature describing the relationship between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and outcomes of surgical treatment of HBPC patients from the start of each database to September 29, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to rate the quality of the studies.

Results

This analysis included a total of 16 articles with a combined patient cohort of 2,599 individuals. The results demonstrated that HBPC patients with osteopenia had significantly inferior OS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.70-3.03, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.42-2.71, p < 0.001) compared to those without osteopenia. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that these findings were consistent across univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The risk of postoperative major complications was significantly higher in patients with osteopenia compared to those without osteopenia (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.19-2.33, p < 0.001). Besides, we also found that the presence of osteosarcopenia in HBPC patients was significantly related to poorer OS (HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.00-5.48, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.62-3.84, p < 0.001) in comparison to those without osteosarcopenia.

Conclusion

Preoperative osteopenia and osteosarcopenia can predict poorer OS and RFS with HBPC after surgery.

Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration, leading to increased fracture risk. Etidronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts - bone cells that break down bone tissue. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008. For clinical relevance, we investigated etidronate's effects on postmenopausal women stratified by fracture risk (low versus high).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of intermittent/cyclic etidronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk of fracture, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, two clinical trial registers, the websites of drug approval agencies, and the bibliographies of relevant systematic reviews. We identified eligible trials published between 1966 and February 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of etidronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Women in the experimental arms must have received at least one year of etidronate, with or without other anti-osteoporotic drugs and concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Eligible comparators were placebo (i.e. no treatment; or calcium, vitamin D, or both) or another anti-osteoporotic drug. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled one or more of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, a low bone mineral density T-score (≤ -2.5), or aged 75 years or older. If none of these criteria were met, we considered the study to be primary prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The review has three main comparisons: (1) etidronate 400 mg/day versus placebo; (2) etidronate 200 mg/day versus placebo; (3) etidronate at any dosage versus another anti-osteoporotic agent. We stratified the analyses for each comparison into primary and secondary prevention studies. For major outcomes in the placebo-controlled studies of etidronate 400 mg/day, we followed our original review by defining a greater than 15% relative change as clinically important. For all outcomes of interest, we extracted outcome measurements at the longest time point in the study.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty studies met the review's eligibility criteria. Of these, 26 studies, with a total of 2770 women, reported data that we could extract and quantitatively synthesize. There were nine primary and 17 secondary prevention studies. We had concerns about at least one risk of bias domain in each study. None of the studies described appropriate methods for allocation concealment, although 27% described adequate methods of random sequence generation. We judged that only 8% of the studies avoided performance bias, and provided adequate descriptions of appropriate blinding methods. One-quarter of studies that reported efficacy outcomes were at high risk of attrition bias, whilst 23% of studies reporting safety outcomes were at high risk in this domain. The 30 included studies compared (1) etidronate 400 mg/day to placebo (13 studies: nine primary and four secondary prevention); (2) etidronate 200 mg/day to placebo (three studies, all secondary prevention); or (3) etidronate (both dosing regimens) to another anti-osteoporotic agent (14 studies: one primary and 13 secondary prevention). We discuss only the etidronate 400 mg/day versus placebo comparison here. For primary prevention, we collected moderate- to very low-certainty evidence from nine studies (one to four years in length) including 740 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Compared to placebo, etidronate 400 mg/day probably results in little to no difference in non-vertebral fractures (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 1.61); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.8% fewer, 95% CI 8.9% fewer to 6.1% more) and serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.54; ARR 1.1% fewer, 95% CI 4.9% fewer to 5.3% more), based on moderate-certainty evidence. Etidronate 400 mg/day may result in little to no difference in clinical vertebral fractures (RR 3.03, 95% CI 0.32 to 28.44; ARR 0.02% more, 95% CI 0% fewer to 0% more) and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.47; ARR 2.3% more, 95% CI 1.1% fewer to 8.4% more), based on low-certainty evidence. We do not know the effect of etidronate on hip fractures because the evidence is very uncertain (RR not estimable based on very low-certainty evidence). Wrist fractures were not reported in the included studies. For secondary prevention, four studies (two to four years in length) including 667 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided the evidence. Compared to placebo, etidronate 400 mg/day may make little or no difference to non-vertebral fractures (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.58; ARR 0.9% more, 95% CI 3.8% fewer to 8.1% more), based on low-certainty evidence. The evidence is very uncertain about etidronate's effects on hip fractures (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17 to 5.19; ARR 0.0% fewer, 95% CI 1.2% fewer to 6.3% more), wrist fractures (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.04; ARR 0.0% fewer, 95% CI 2.5% fewer to 15.9% more), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.18; ARR 0.4% more, 95% CI 1.9% fewer to 4.9% more), and serious adverse events (RR not estimable), compared to placebo. Clinical vertebral fractures were not reported in the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update echoes the key findings of our previous review that etidronate probably makes or may make little to no difference to vertebral and non-vertebral fractures for both primary and secondary prevention.

Atypical lumbar pedicle fractures. A case report and comparative review of the literature: Bisphosphonate-related? Possible matching with diagnostic criteria of atypical fractures of the femur

Introduction

Bisphosphonates are commonly used to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Many randomized controlled trials have proved the efficacy of bisphosphonates, showing their ability to increase bone mineral density and decrease the risk of hip and vertebral fractures. Atypical, bisphosphonate-related fractures concerning the femur have been widely described and a list of primary and secondary clinical and radiographic criteria are used in order to achieve diagnosis.

Research question

To identify clinical and radiographic findings for a possible association of vertebral fractures to prolonged bisphosphonate therapy.

Material and methods

In this paper we present a case of an atraumatic bilateral pedicle lumbar fracture, assuming the hypothesis of an insufficiency atypical fracture due to prolonged Alendronate therapy for osteoporosis. We highlight the various aspects for diagnosis, treatment and a review of the existing literature was carried out.

Discussion and conclusion

Atypical fractures in the spine are rarely reported in the literature. Pedicle anatomy is partially similar to a long bone, described as a strong bridge between the posterior arch and the vertebral body composed of a cortical bone and a cancellous core. Stress fractures are reported as a result of an underlying bone disease, trauma, post-surgery and stress fractures. In our opinion, the criteria described for atypical femoral fractures are a useful tool to also classify these rare pedicle lesions as insufficiency, bisphosphonate-correlated fractures.

Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of Cariprazine based on the real-world data of FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the adverse events (AEs) of Cariprazine based on the FAERS database, providing evidence for its safety surveillance.

METHODS

For signal quantification of Cariprazine-related AEs, we used disproportionality analysis including the Ratio of Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithms.

RESULTS

We selected Cariprazine-related AE reports from the FAERS database from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2023, and performed a detailed data analysis. Out of a total of 12,278,580 case reports, 3659 were found to be directly related to Cariprazine. We identified 140 Preferred Terms (PT) to describe these AEs, finding that they involved 27 organ systems. Specifically, AEs related to eye disorders such as Cataract cortical, Cataract nuclear, Accommodation disorder, Lenticular opacities, Oculogyric crisis, Dyschromatopsia were not explicitly mentioned in the drug's leaflet, indicating the presence of new ADR signals.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the FAERS database identified AEs associated with Cariprazine, notably in eye disorders not previously documented in the drug's official leaflet. These findings emphasize the need for continuous post-market surveillance and awareness among healthcare professionals regarding potential new ADR signals.

Atypical femur fracture in a male without history of bisphosphonate use: a case report

BACKGROUND

Atypical femur fractures are a rare occurrence, especially in bisphosphonate-naïve men, and merit reporting owing to their unusual presentation and clinical implications. This case report highlights a unique instance of atypical femur fractures in a 73-year-old male with no prior bisphosphonate exposure.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient, a 73-year-old Indian male with no history of bisphosphonate use, presented with left thigh pain and swelling following a minor fall. Radiographic assessment unveiled a closed left mid diaphyseal femoral shaft fracture. Subsequent imaging revealed an impending fracture in the contralateral femur. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, encompassing radiographic analysis, laboratory tests, and clinical assessment confirmed the diagnosis. Surgical management via intramedullary nailing was pursued for both fractures. Notably, the patient's medical history was characterized by radiographic manifestations, the infrequent occurrence of atypical femur fractures in men, and associated risk factors. Treatment encompassed anabolic bone therapy employing teriparatide, alongside discontinuation of antiresorptive agents.

CONCLUSIONS

This case underscores the significance of considering atypical femur fractures in older individuals with limited trauma history. It accentuates the role of anabolic agents in the therapeutic regimen and contributes to the evolving understanding of atypical femur fractures. The report underscores the need for vigilant monitoring and tailored management strategies in similar cases, thereby enhancing clinical practice and patient care.

Cardiovascular Safety Evaluation of Febuxostat and Allopurinol: Findings from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Febuxostat and allopurinol are the most commonly used uric acid-lowering medications, and their safety is of great concern, especially the cardiovascular adverse reactions associated with febuxostat. We propose to study the cardiovascular toxicity of febuxostat and allopurinol using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

A total of 64 quarters of FAERS data were downloaded from 2004 to 2019. Febuxostat- and allopurinol-related cardiovascular adverse events were extracted after data cleaning. Signal detection was conducted by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR).

RESULTS

There were 2939 and 25,219 reports of febuxostat- and allopurinol-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), respectively. The most frequent CVAEs with febuxostat and allopurinol were edema peripheral (14.38%) and peripheral swelling (8.76%), respectively. In elderly gout patients, febuxostat is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and cardiomyopathy. Febuxostat in combination with acetic acid derivatives nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) also increases the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with allopurinol, febuxostat may increase cardiovascular toxicity in patients with gout.

Orthognathic surgery in patients treated with bisphosphonates: A case series

The aim of this case series was to complete the literature with six other cases of orthognathic surgery in patients treated with bisphosphonate (BP). The majority of studies concerning oral and maxillofacial surgery focus on dental extractions and implant placement in patients treated with BP. Only 5 cases of orthognathic surgery in patients treated with BP have been reported: four cases for osteogenesis imperfecta and one case for osteoporosis. Six patients were included in the study from January 2009 to December 2020: 3 treated for fibrous dysplasia and 3 treated for osteoporosis. BP treatment was stopped for 2 cases because it was the scheduled end of their treatment for fibrous dyplasia. The other four cases didn't stop taking BP for surgery. No precautions for the prevention of MRONJ were taken. The operative follow-up was uneventful. Mucosal healing was satisfactory for all patients at D15. No material exposure were observed. Bone consolidation appears complete on X-rays and on CT-scans at D45 with disappearance and bone filling of the fracture line associated with the absence of painful mobility of the maxilla and mandible on clinical examination. Until now, all the patients have a stable class I occlusion, no signs of osteonecrosis on X-rays (no signs of bone demineralization, no hypermineralized bone sequestration, no signs of osteolysis) or periodontal disease and healed osteotomies of the jaw without radiological features. No relapse were observed. The management of patients treated with bisphosphonate should be done carefully but orthognathic surgery is no longer a contraindication.

Atypical femur fracture associated with common anti-osteoporosis drugs in FDA adverse event reporting system

Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a rare but catastrophic adverse event first reported in the long-term use of alendronate, one of the most commonly used drugs for osteoporosis currently. However, further evidence is needed to learn more regarding other common anti-osteoporosis drugs and the risk for AFF. In this study, reports of AFF were identified from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analyses were performed to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR), information component (IC) and adjusted ROR (adj. ROR) signals for AFF for common anti-osteoporosis drugs. A total of 1692 unique AFF reports were identified. The disproportionality signals (the lower bound of 95% confidence interval > 1 for ROR and adjusted ROR, and > 0 for IC) were detected for alendronate, denosumab, pamidronate, risedronate, zoledronate, ibandronate, and teriparatide while no signal was detected for raloxifene, abaloparatide, and romosozumab. When restricted in patients with osteoporosis, the disproportionality signals were still detected for alendronate, pamidronate, risedronate, denosumab, and ibandronate. Our results suggest that alendronate has the largest risk signal, while the risks varied among different bisphosphonates. In addition, denosumab was found statistically associated with AFF in both the entire database and patients with osteoporosis.

Post-Fracture Care Program: Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Older Adults with Fragility Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present and discuss the recently published scientific evidence on the approach, mode of action, and timing of osteoporosis therapy initiation after fragility fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

A comprehensive management approach is required to reduce mortality and morbidity associated with fragility fractures. This will help to reduce the risk of missing the diagnosis of osteoporosis as the underlying disorder while at the same time promoting the timely treatment of osteoporosis. The target is to minimize the incidence of post-traumatic disability and to reduce the imminent fracture risk. This article will present a Bone-Care algorithm for the diagnosis and management of fragility fractures in patients presenting for trauma surgery. This algorithm has been developed based on recently published national as well as international guidelines for implementation in standard clinical practice. International figures revealed that only a small proportion of those patients at high risk of sustaining a fragility fracture receive osteoporosis therapy. Based on the best currently available evidence, it is safe to start osteoporosis therapy in the acute post-fracture period (the optimal therapeutic window of romosozumab is the late endochondral phase/throughout bone remodeling). The right Bone-Care pathway ensures the delivery of a comprehensive management approach that meets the global call to action. All parameters including risk, benefit, compliance, and cost should be considered on an individual base for all kinds of therapy.

An extensive survey on the use of supervised machine learning techniques in the past two decades for prediction of drug side effects

Approved drugs for sale must be effective and safe, implying that the drug's advantages outweigh its known harmful side effects. Side effects (SE) of drugs are one of the common reasons for drug failure that may halt the whole drug discovery pipeline. The side effects might vary from minor concerns like a runny nose to potentially life-threatening issues like liver damage, heart attack, and death. Therefore, predicting the side effects of the drug is vital in drug development, discovery, and design. Supervised machine learning-based side effects prediction task has recently received much attention since it reduces time, chemical waste, design complexity, risk of failure, and cost. The advancement of supervised learning approaches for predicting side effects have emerged as essential computational tools. Supervised machine learning technique provides early information on drug side effects to develop an effective drug based on drug properties. Still, there are several challenges to predicting drug side effects. Thus, a near-exhaustive survey is carried out in this paper on the use of supervised machine learning approaches employed in drug side effects prediction tasks in the past two decades. In addition, this paper also summarized the drug descriptor required for the side effects prediction task, commonly utilized drug properties sources, computational models, and their performances. Finally, the research gap, open problems, and challenges for the further supervised learning-based side effects prediction task have been discussed.

Zoledronic Acid Does Not Retard Bone Union: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Fragility Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

BACKGROUND

Fragility hip fracture is a leading cause of death in the elderly and is common in postmenopausal women and elderly people. In the treatment of osteoporosis, bisphosphonates (BPs) are often considered first-line medications. Zoledronic acid is the most potent and long-acting BP in clinical use and is administered as an intravenous infusion. In the context of acute fractures, the use of BPs has been controversial due to conflicting reports of their positive and negative effects on fracture healing. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of zoledronic acid on fracture healing in intertrochanteric (IT) fragility fractures.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a tertiary healthcare center after receiving scientific and ethical approval. The study included 136 patients of either gender over the age of 50 who presented with an IT femur fracture after minor trauma between November 2020 and November 2022. The total number of patients had been classified into two groups, and grouping involved random sampling: Group T (test group, n = 68; zoledronic acid injections were given on postoperative day 3) and Group C (control group, n = 68; interventions were given after fracture healing). Patients were evaluated using the Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) and Singh Index for radiological outcomes and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) for functional outcomes. The patients were followed for six months.

RESULTS

The overall mean age was 73.25 years; in Group T, it was 72.5 ± 11.9 years, and in Group C, it was 73.7 ± 11.8 years. Of 136 patients, 69 (51%) were males and 67 (49%) were females. The average fracture healing time in Group T was 12.2 ± 3.6 weeks, while it was 13.0 ± 2.8 weeks in Group C. Functional outcomes, including HHS, were found to be better in Group T than in Group C (p < 0.005). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to the radiological union, the RUSH score, or Singh Index, implying no negative effect of zoledronic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that postoperative intravenous zoledronic acid therapy does not retard fracture healing. Osteoporosis management is frequently neglected because of a surgeon's fear of ZOL retarding fracture healing and a lack of awareness among patients, resulting in low compliance. Thus, opportunistic administration of zoledronic acid postoperatively can be beneficial and will increase compliance for osteoporosis management and fracture prevention to 100%.

Advancement in the Treatment of Osteoporosis and the Effects on Bone Healing

Osteoporosis (OP) is a major global health concern, with aging being one of the most important risk factors. Osteoarthritis (OA) is also an age-related disorder. Patients with OP and/or OA may be treated surgically for fractures or when their quality of life is impaired. Poor bone quality due to OP can seriously complicate the stability of a bone fixation construct and/or surgical fracture treatment. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of normal and osteoporotic bone healing, the effect of a bone fracture on bone turnover markers, the diagnosis of a low bone mineral density (BMD) before surgical intervention, and the effect of available anti-osteoporosis treatment. Interventions that improve bone health may enhance the probability of favorable surgical outcomes. Fracture healing and the treatment of atypical femoral fractures are also discussed.

Early bisphosphonate therapy post proximal femoral fracture fixation does not impact fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conjecture on the optimal timing to administer bisphosphonate therapy following operative fixation of low-trauma hip fractures. Factors include recommendations for early opportunistic commencement of osteoporosis treatment, and clinician concern regarding the effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if early administration of bisphosphonate therapy within the first month post-operatively following proximal femur fracture fixation is associated with delay in fracture healing or rates of delayed or non-union.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials examining fracture healing and union rates in adults with proximal femoral fractures undergoing osteosynthesis fixation methods and administered bisphosphonates within 1 month of operation with a control group. Data were pooled in meta-analyses where possible. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the GRADE approach were used to assess validity.

RESULTS

For the outcome of time to fracture union, meta-analysis of three studies (n = 233) found evidence for earlier average time to union for patients receiving early bisphosphonate intervention (MD = -1.06 weeks, 95% CI -2.01--0.12, I²  = 8%). There was no evidence from two included studies comprising 718 patients of any difference in rates of delayed union (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.25-1.46). Meta-analyses did not demonstrate a difference in outcomes of mortality, function or pain.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide low-level evidence that there is no reduction in time to healing or delay in bony union for patients receiving bisphosphonates within 1 month of proximal femur fixation.

Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was originally published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk for fractures, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

With broader and updated strategies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. A grey literature search, including the online databases ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and drug approval agencies, as well as bibliography checks of relevant systematic reviews was also performed. Eligible trials published between 1966 to 24 March 2021 were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Participants must have received at least one year of risedronate, placebo or other anti-osteoporotic drugs, with or without concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. In the interest of clinical relevance and applicability, we classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled more than one of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD)T score ≤ -2.5, and age ≥ 75 years old. If none of these criteria was met, the study was considered to be primary prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We pooled the relative risk (RR) of fractures using a fixed-effect model based on the expectation that the clinical and methodological characteristics of the respective primary and secondary prevention studies would be homogeneous, and the experience from the previous review suggesting that there would be a small number of studies. The base case included the data available for the longest treatment period in each placebo-controlled trial and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important. The main findings of the review were presented in summary of findings tables, using the GRADE approach. In addition, we looked at benefit and harm comparisons between different dosage regimens for risedronate and between risedronate and other anti-osteoporotic drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria, among which 33 studies (27,348 participants) reported data that could be extracted and quantitatively synthesized. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial. Selection bias was the most frequent concern, with only 24% of the studies describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Fifty per cent and 39% of the studies reporting benefit and harm outcomes, respectively, were subject to high risk. None of the studies included in the quantitative syntheses were judged to be at low risk of bias in all seven domains. The results described below pertain to the comparisons for daily risedronate 5 mg versus placebo which reported major outcomes. Other comparisons are described in the full text. For primary prevention, low- to very low-certainty evidence was collected from four studies (one to two years in length) including 989 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Risedronate 5 mg/day may make little or no difference to wrist fractures [RR 0.48 ( 95% CI 0.03 to 7.50; two studies, 243 participants); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 7% more)] and withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.18; three studies, 748 participants); ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 5% fewer to 1% more)], based on low-certainty evidence. However, its preventive effects on non-vertebral fractures and serious adverse events are not known due to the very low-certainty evidence. There were zero clinical vertebral and hip fractures reported therefore the effects of risedronate for these outcomes are not estimable.  For secondary prevention, nine studies (one to three years in length) including 14,354 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided evidence. Risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fractures [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90; six studies, 12,173 participants); RRR 20% (95% CI 10% to 28%) and ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 3% fewer), moderate certainty], and may reduce hip fractures [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); RRR 27% (95% CI 6% to 44%) and ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 0.2% fewer to 1% fewer), low certainty]. Both of these effects are probably clinically important. However, risedronate's effects are not known for wrist fractures [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.24); three studies,1746 participants); ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more), very-low certainty] and not estimable for clinical vertebral fractures due to zero events reported (low certainty). Risedronate results in little to no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; eight studies, 9529 participants); ARR 0.3% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more); 16.9% in risedronate versus 17.2% in control, high certainty] and probably results in little to no difference in serious adverse events [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.07; six studies, 9435 participants); ARR 0% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 2% more; 29.2% in both groups, moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update recaps the key findings from our previous review that, for secondary prevention, risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fracture, and may reduce the risk of hip fractures. We are uncertain on whether risedronate 5mg/day reduces clinical vertebral and wrist fractures.  Compared to placebo, risedronate probably does not increase the risk of serious adverse events.  For primary prevention, the benefit and harms of risedronate were supported by limited evidence with high uncertainty.

Development and Validation of a Post-Operative Non-Union Risk Score for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Background: Our objective was to develop and validate a predictive model for non-union following a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Methods: Following institutional board approval, 316 consecutive patients presenting to our institution (84 non-unions) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were retrospectively identified. To identify potential unadjusted associations with progression to non-union, simple logistic regression models were used, followed by a revised adjusted model of multiple logistic regression. Results: Having established the risk factors for non-union, the coefficients were used to produce a risk score for predicting non-union. To identify the high-risk patients in the early post-operative period, self-dynamisation was excluded. The revised scoring system was the sum of the following: diabetes (6); deep wound infection (35); simple or severe comminution (13); presence of an atypical fracture (14); lateral cortex gap size ≥5 mm (11), varus malreduction (5–10 degrees) (9); varus malreduction (>10 degrees) (20). On the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve, the area under the curve (0.790) demonstrated very good discriminatory capability of the scoring system, with good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test; p = 0.291). Moreover, 5-fold cross validation confirmed good fit of the model and internal validity (accuracy 0.806; Kappa 0.416). The cut-point determined by Youden’s formula was calculated as 18. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the risk of non-union can be reliably estimated in patients presenting with a subtrochanteric fracture, from the immediate post-operative period. The resulting non-union risk score can be used not only to identify the high-risk patients early, offering them appropriate consultation and in some cases surgical intervention, but also informs surgeons of the modifiable surgery related factors that contribute to this risk.

Bone Nanomechanical Properties and Relationship to Bone Turnover and Architecture in Patients With Atypical Femur Fractures: A Prospective Nested Case-Control Study

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are well‐established serious complication of long‐term bisphosphonate and denosumab therapy in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. To elucidate underlying mechanism(s) for the development of AFF, we performed a nested case‐control study to investigate bone tissue nanomechanical properties and prevailing bone microstructure and tissue‐level remodeling status as assessed by bone histomorphometry. We hypothesized that there would be differences in nanomechanical properties between patients with and without AFF and that bone microstructure and remodeling would be related to nanomechanical properties. Thirty‐two full‐thickness transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from age‐ and sex‐matched patients on long‐term bisphosphonate therapy with (n = 16) and without an AFF (n = 16). Standard histomorphometric measurements were made in each sample on three different bone envelopes (cancellous, intracortical, and endosteal). Iliac bone wall thickness was significantly lower on all three bone surfaces in patients with AFF than in those without AFF. Surface‐based bone formation rate was suppressed similarly in both groups in comparison to healthy premenopausal and postmenopausal women, with no significant difference between the two groups. Nanoindentation was used to assess material properties of cortical and cancellous bone separately. Elastic modulus was higher in cortical than in cancellous bone in patients with AFF as well as compared to the elastic modulus of cortical bone from non‐AFF patients. However, the elastic modulus of the cancellous bone was not different between AFF and non‐AFF groups or between cortical and cancellous bone of non‐AFF patients. Resistance to plastic deformation was decreased in cortical bone in both AFF and non‐AFF groups compared to cancellous bone, but to a greater extent in AFF patients. We conclude that long‐term bisphosphonate therapy is associated with prolonged suppression of bone turnover resulting in altered cortical remodeling and tissue nanomechanical properties leading to AFF. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Outcome of revision surgery for bisphosphonate related subtrochanteric fracture non-union following failed intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates use is a recognised cause of atypical femur fractures. Intramedullary nailing is the first line of treatment for these fractures, but failure is a common problem due to altered biology, resulting in a non-union and a challenging problem.

PURPOSE

There is lack of evidence in the literature on revision surgery for the management of non-union after failed nailing in atypical femur fracture. We present our experience of treating this complex problem.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all consecutive cases of revision surgery for non-union of bisphosphonate related subtrochanteric fractures was undertaken. All procedures were performed between 2012 and 2017 by a single surgeon. Revision surgery included removal of failed metalwork, resection of non-union, bone grafting and double plating with a lateral DCS plate and anterior locking compression plate.

RESULTS

Ten patients (9 females, 1 male) were included with a mean age of 71.5 years and mean BMI of 34 at the time of revision. All patients received previous Bisphosphonate treatment on average for 6.2 years. One patient was lost to follow up. Mean time for non-weight bearing (NWB) mobilization was 7 months and mean time for union was 14 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture healing can be achieved with bone grafting and compression plating in all patients. However, a prolonged time to achieve union and a long follow-up duration should be expected.

Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: narrative review

Tigecycline is unique glycylcycline class of semisynthetic antimicrobial agents developed for the treatment of polymicrobial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Tigecycline evades the main tetracycline resistance genetic mechanisms, such as tetracycline-specific efflux pump acquisition and ribosomal protection, via the addition of a glycyclamide moiety to the 9-position of minocycline. The use of the parenteral form of tigecycline is approved for complicated skin and skin structure infections (excluding diabetes foot infection), complicated intra-abdominal infections, and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults. New evidence also suggests the effectiveness of tigecycline for the treatment of severe Clostridioides difficile infections. Tigecycline showed in vitro susceptibility to Coxiella spp., Rickettsia spp., and multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonnorrhoeae strains which indicate the possible use of tigecycline in the treatment of infections caused by these pathogens. Except for intrinsic, or often reported resistance in some Gram-negatives, tigecycline is effective against a wide range of multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogens. Herein, we summarize the currently available data on tigecycline pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, its mechanism of action, the epidemiology of tigecycline resistance, and its clinical effectiveness.

Morphological and Morphometrical Analyses of Fracture-Healing Sites of an Atypical Femoral Fracture in Patients with and without Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Report of Two Cases

Bisphosphonates have been the first drug of choice for osteoporosis in the recent years because of their known ability to suppress osteoclast activity. The adverse effect of long-term bisphosphonate administration in the fracture-healing process is controversial. The aim of our study was to observe not only morphology but also morphometry of the fracture site of atypical femoral fracture with and without long-term bisphosphonate administration, in a case study of two difficult-to-obtain human samples. The patients with insufficient healing of atypical femoral fracture were treated with valgus wedge osteotomy. Histomorphometrical analysis was performed in bone samples of fracture sites harvested during osteotomy. The thickness of the femoral cortex was measured in the fracture site and the adjacent, non-fracture site. A comparative analysis of the content of hypertrophic osteoclasts in fracture sites, shape and size of osteons, mass, and ratio of the woven bone to the total bone mass was performed, comparing bisphosphonate-treated and untreated samples. In bisphosphonate-treated samples, we observed femoral cortex thickening at the fracture site; the appearance of hypertrophic osteoclasts; decreased bone resorption surface, decreased osteoclast numbers on the bone resorption surface, and increased ratio of multinuclear osteoclasts; osteons were misshapen and thin; and the mass and ratio of the woven bone to the total bone mass were higher. This study demonstrated that long-term bisphosphonate administration can alter the morphological features of the fracture site compared to its physiological state.

Treatment strategy for atypical ulnar fracture due to severely suppressed bone turnover caused by long-term bisphosphonate therapy: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Atypical fractures may occur due to the combined effect of severely suppressed bone turnover (SSBT) caused by long-term bisphosphonate treatment and chronic repetitive bone microdamage. Atypical fracture of the ulna due to SSBT is a rare entity; there is no standardized treatment strategy for this condition. We successfully treated a patient with atypical fracture of the ulna. Herein, we present this patient, review the relevant literature, and discuss the treatment strategy.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 84-year-old woman presented with atypical fracture of the left ulnar shaft due to SSBT. She had a history of bisphosphonate therapy (ibandronate and alendronate) since more than 10 years; her bone turnover was severely suppressed. We performed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using dual plate with some additional treatments. These included drilling and decortication, use of autogenous bone graft, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatment, and administration of teriparatide. Finally, bone union was observed at 11 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature review and our experience with this case, ORIF alone may not be adequate to achieve bone union; drilling, decortication, and use of cancellus bone graft is important to achieve favorable outcomes. Administration of teriparatide and LIPUS may facilitate early bone union, although further studies are required to provide more definitive evidence. Furthermore, ORIF using dual plate may help avoid implant failure owing to the long time required for bone union.

Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures of the hip: characterisation of three cases

INTRODUCTION

Long-term use of bisphosphonates (BPs) has been associated with a specific type of tensile side femoral stress fracture known as Atypical Femoral Fracture (AFF). Theoretically periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) should be excluded from the diagnosis of AFF. However, emerging evidence correlates prolonged BPs use with the occurrence of a type of PFF with an atypical pattern (atypical PFF, APFF). The aim of the present study is to report 3 cases of APFF treated at a single centre.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic records of PFF that occurred between January 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients meeting the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria for definition of PFF were included. Management strategies for APFF and patient outcomes, including fracture healing and hip function (assessed by the Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) were collected.

RESULTS

3 patients in the study period were identified as APFF (1 incomplete, 2 complete). All patients were females with a mean age of 83.3 years. All patients were treated with lateral plating. The application of a contralateral strut allograft resulted in fracture healing in cases of complete fractures. Mean OHS at final follow-up was 34.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite occurring around a hip stem like PFF, APFF had peculiar clinical and radiographic features, making them more similar to AFF. Therefore, the orthopaedic surgeon should also consider the natural history and healing problems associated with AFF prior in order to choose the most appropriate management for APFF.

Bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fractures: A novel strategy to improve patient outcomes

Background:

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is a serious adverse event associated with bisphosphonate therapy and prone to complications and delayed union. We propose a technique and management strategy to maximise bone healing and outcomes.

Methods:

We report on a cohort of patients with AFF using our novel technique of preparing the intramedullary canal and rigid fixation with cephalomedullary nailing. Patients were admitted under a multidisciplinary team with rehabilitation goals of early mobilisation and teriparatide initiation. Clinical and radiographic data were retrospectively reviewed.

Results:

Twenty-eight AFFs were treated with a mean follow-up of 58.5 weeks and a mean age of 75.2 years old. All cases achieved radiological union by a mean of 6 months and post-operative thigh pain experienced up to 8.7 weeks. No cases underwent revision or experienced intraoperative complication.

Conclusion:

Our surgical technique and multidisciplinary management are reproducible with excellent results in patients with this rare yet challenging injury.

Increased rate of reoperation in atypical femoral fractures is related to patient characteristics and not fracture type. A nationwide cohort study

Atypical femoral fractures are burdened with a high rate of reoperation. In our nationwide analysis, the increased rate of reoperation was related to patient background characteristics, such as age and health status, rather than fracture type.

INTRODUCTION

Patients with atypical fractures are complex to treat and burdened with a high risk of reoperation. We hypothesized that patients with surgically treated, complete atypical fractures have a higher risk of any reoperation and reoperation related to healing complications than patients with common femoral shaft fractures but that this increase would become insignificant when adjusted for predefined characteristics.

METHODS

A cohort of 163 patients with atypical fractures and 862 patients with common femoral shaft or subtrochanteric fractures treated from 2008 to 2010 and who had follow-up radiographs and register data available until 31 December 2014 was included. Reoperations were identified by a complementary review of radiographs and register data and were used to calculate risks for any reoperation and reoperations related to healing complications.

RESULTS

Patients with atypical fractures were more likely to be reoperated for any reason, age-adjusted OR 1.76 (95% CI, 1.08 to 2.86). However, patients with common fractures had a shorter follow-up due to a threefold higher death rate. Accordingly, in a multivariable-adjusted time-to-event model, the increased risk lost statistical significance for any reoperations, cause-specific HR 1.34 (95% CI, 0.85 to 2.13), and for reoperations related to healing complications, HR 1.32 (95% CI, 0.58 to 3.0). Continued use of bisphosphonate in the first year after the fracture did not affect the reoperation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the increased risk of reoperation after an atypical femur fracture is largely explained by patient characteristics and not fracture type.

Is Femoral Fracture Healing Really Compromised in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis? Comparison Study Between Rheumatoid and Non-rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), some problems might occur in fracture healing; however, clinical evidence is limited. Therefore, we compared the time to union and complication rate of femoral fractures between RA and non-RA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 42 RA patients who underwent osteosynthesis for femoral trochanter or shaft fracture. For comparison with the RA group, 126 non-RA patients were selected as a control group. The RA group was divided into the trochanteric (RA group I) and shaft fracture group (RA group II) for comparison with each control group (control groups I and II). We analyzed risk factors for nonunion or delayed union and divided patients according to whether atypical or ordinary fracture in shaft fracture.

RESULTS

Time to union (p = 0.823) and complication rate (p = 0.440) did not differ significantly between RA group I and control group I. A significantly longer time to union (p = 0.001) and higher nonunion rate (p = 0.013) were observed in RA group II compared with control group II. The presence of RA (p = 0.040) and atypical femoral fracture (p = 0.006) were significant risk factors for nonunion or delayed union.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of atypical femoral fracture among the femur shaft fractures in the RA patients was considered a significant risk factor for nonunion and delayed union.

Effect of continuous long-term treatment for 10 years with bisphosphonate on Japanese osteoporosis patients

INTRODUCTION

In terms of the balance between benefits and risks of long-term treatment with bisphosphonate, uncertainties remain regarding the optimal treatment duration. We investigated effects of continuous long-term treatment for 10 years with bisphosphonate in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty five patients in the outpatient clinic of our hospital have been continuously treated with alendronate or risedronate for 10 years. All data were retrospectively collected. The age, height, weight, total muscle volume, total fat volume, and BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and distal 1/3 radius, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRAP5b), calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) levels were measured pre- and after the start of 10-year continuous treatment.

RESULTS

BMD at the lumbar spine increased continuously over the 10-year period, while BMD at the total hip slightly but significantly decreased, and that at the 1/3 radius did not show any significant change over the 10 years. Serum Ca value was significantly decreased after the start of treatment, and became stable within the reference range from the second year. Bone resorption markers such as uNTX and TRAP5b significantly decreased from the second year after the start of treatment and no significant changes were observed thereafter. There were no serious medical adverse events including atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the continuous use of alendronate and risedronate for 10 years could be an option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

Natural history of incomplete atypical femoral fractures in patients after a prolonged and variable course of bisphosphonate therapy-a long-term radiological follow-up

Understanding the natural history of lateral femoral stress fractures helps to guide their management. Improvement in their radiographic characteristics is rare. Progression was generally sequential, most developing an incomplete fracture line before fracture displacement. Stopping bisphosphonates decreased the fracture rate, a feasible management option for lesions without incomplete fracture lines.

INTRODUCTION

Retrospective study evaluating the natural history of lateral femoral stress fractures (FSF) by serial radiography over a variable period of time in a cohort of patients treated for some time with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, whilst also identifying the fracture response in cases where bisphosphonates were discontinued.

METHODS

The radiographs of 76 consecutive patients (92 femurs) with 161 FSF were reviewed to document their change over time. Femurs were classified into the following: A-normal, B-focal cortical thickening, C-dreaded black line and D-displaced fracture. Bisphosphonate history was recorded.

RESULTS

66.5% FSF showed group stability between the first and last radiographs: group B (79.1%), group C (45.7%). 28.6% progressed, mostly following an ordered sequence starting from group A, progressing to B, then C, before culminating in D. Progression rate was as follows: A-100% (11/11), B-18.3% (21/115), C-40% (14/35). Regression in FSF was uncommon-5.6% (8/161). 34.8% (32/92) sustained displaced fractures. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed statistically significant difference between the groups; median survival (95% CI): A-4189 (-), B-3383.0 (-), C-1807 (0.0-3788.6) and progression to displaced fracture when bisphosphonate had been stopped for at least 6 months. The group without recent bisphosphonates had a lower group progression rate (17.1%, 12/70). Nevertheless, 10.9% (5/46) progressed to displaced fracture. This group also had the highest proportion of stable (77.1%, 54/70) and regressive lesions (5.7%, 4/70).

CONCLUSIONS

In FSF, there is natural progression from normal bone, to focal cortical thickening, to dreaded black line and eventually to displaced fracture. Most lesions persist, remaining static or progressing, especially if a dreaded black line is present and bisphosphonates are continued. Regression is uncommon and more frequent when bisphosphonates are discontinued. Despite stopping bisphosphonates, there remains a 10.9% risk of progression to displaced fracture.

Nonunions of Bisphosphonate Fractures of the Femur: Presentation, Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Operative Treatment

Patients presenting with femoral fractures and long-term use of bisphosphonate treatment are at risk of developing a delayed union and/or nonunion as a result of the atypical metabolic activity prevailing at the fracture edges of the affected extremity. The treatment of these nonunions poses a serious challenge to orthopaedic surgeons worldwide and necessitates specialized techniques and materials to design a construct that will last a long period (greater than 6 months), while still allowing weight-bearing in this elderly population. Treatment options, timing of intervention, selection of implant, and the option of bone grafting are discussed to assist the clinician to make the right decisions in these complex clinical cases.

National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop: Research Gaps for Long-Term Drug Therapies for Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention

On 30 and 31 October 2018, the National Institutes of Health convened the Pathways to Prevention (P2P) Workshop: Appropriate Use of Drug Therapies for Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention to assess the available evidence on long-term (>3 years) use of drug therapies to prevent osteoporotic fractures and identify research gaps and needs for advancing the field. The workshop was cosponsored by the NIH Office of Disease Prevention (ODP), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, and National Institute on Aging. A multidisciplinary working group developed the agenda, and an Evidence-based Practice Center prepared an evidence report through a contract with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to facilitate the discussion. During the 1.5-day workshop, invited experts discussed the body of evidence and attendees had the opportunity to comment during open discussions. After data from the evidence report, expert presentations, and public comments were weighed, an unbiased independent panel prepared a draft report that was posted on the ODP Web site for 5 weeks for public comment. This final report summarizes the panel's findings and recommendations. Current gaps in knowledge are highlighted, and a set of recommendations for new, strengthened research to better inform the long-term use of osteoporotic drug therapies is delineated.

Bone Mineral Density as a Risk Factor for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We have reported the impact of sarcopenia and body composition on patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the impact of bone mineral density (BMD) on outcomes after hepatectomy for HCC and correlation with other parameters including sarcopenia are unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 465 patients who underwent primary hepatectomy for HCC between April 2005 and March 2015. We analyzed the plain CT images at the level of the eleventh thoracic vertebra with the region of interest and defined as preoperative BMD.

RESULTS

In this cohort, male (n = 367) and female (n = 98) patients showed significant heterogeneity in age, body composition markers, tumor factors, peri-operative parameters and so on. The median preoperative BMD in male and female patients was 155 and 139 HU, respectively (P = 0.005). BMD was negatively correlated with age in female (r = -0.590, P < 0.001) and intramuscular adipose tissue content in both male and female (r = -0.332 and -0.359, respectively, P < 0.001). For males, BMD < 160 HU was associated with worse cancer-specific survival post-hepatectomy (P = 0.015). In contrast, females were not (P = 0.135). For male patients, multivariate analysis identified low BMD as an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio 1.720, 95% confidence interval 1.038-2.922, P = 0.035) after hepatectomy for HCC.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative low BMD was an independent risk factor for cancer-specific mortality after hepatectomy for HCC.

[Atypical fracture of the femur related to prolonged bisphosphonate use. The importance of saying 'enough's enough']

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent disease with important consequences. The most widely used drugs to control this disease are bisphosphonates but their prolonged use is associated with the risk of atypical fractures. We report the cases of two patients under bisphosphonate treatment with bilateral atypical femoral fractures. In one patient the fractures occurred simultaneously, unprovoked by trauma, and in the other, they occurred as delayed fractures after mild trauma. In both cases, the fractures were preceded by pain. The fractures were treated with intramedullary nailing and bisphosphonate withdrawal with good outcomes. Although bisphosphonates have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing frailty-related fractures, their prolonged use has paradoxically been associated with atypical fractures. These fractures are usually preceded by pain. Consequently, when faced with this clinical picture, physicians should request imaging studies that could show incomplete fractures that could benefit from prophylactic nailing before becoming complete fractures.

The Effects of Long-term Use of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates on Fracture Healing

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) are pharmaceutical agents that have been used for many years to treat osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, Paget's disease, metastatic bone disease, and a variety of other diseases in which bone mineral density is reduced. Given that N-BPs inhibit bone resorption, an important stage in the fracture healing process, they have been extensively studied in preclinical models for their activity. In animal models, treatment with N-BPs is associated with a larger callus formation in fracture area and delay in remodeling from primary woven bone to lamellar bone, but there is no delay in formation of the fracture callus. In humans, all existing evidence suggest that initiating treatment with N-BPs, after upper and lower limb fractures, does not appear to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Rarely, patients with long-term use of N-BPs may develop "atypical fractures" and delay in their healing. Therefore, this clinical condition is not fully understood and many questions remain unanswered. Similarly, there are few studies about the benefits of stopping a long-term treatment with them, if a fracture occurs. Although most studies support that chronic N-BP therapy may lead to fracture healing delay, this is not fully documented. On the other hand, there are studies that are in complete disagreement with them. All of the above suggest that there is a need for more detailed future research into larger patient populations and different types of fractures, with sufficient data on the type, dosage, route and duration of administration of N-BPs, and the control methods of fracture healing, in order to have a safe final conclusion on the effect of their long-term administration in this highly complex process.

Clinical effect of early bisphosphonate treatment for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with osteoporosis: An analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) are expected to have an increased risk of bone loss. Therefore, early bisphosphonate therapy would be clinically effective for PVO patients with osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of bisphosphonate on clinical outcomes of PVO patients with osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

PVO patients with osteoporosis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Four events of interest for Cox proportional hazard model included surgical treatment, recurrence of infection, subsequent fracture of adjacent vertebral bodies, and death.

METHODS

PVO patients were divided into three groups: group A (initiation of bisphosphonate within 6 weeks after PVO diagnosis), group B (initiation of bisphosphonate between 6 weeks and 3 months after PVO diagnosis), and group C (no treatment for osteoporosis). Cox proportional hazard model was used for the four events of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 360 PVO patients with osteoporosis were investigated for the four events of interest. Group A had significantly lower hazard ratios for undergoing later (>6 weeks after diagnosis) surgery than group C (p = .014) despite similar occurrences of overall surgery. A significant difference was also observed in the occurrence of subsequent fractures at adjacent vertebral bodies (p = .001 for model 1 and p = .002 for model 2). Groups A and B had significantly lower hazard ratios for subsequent fracture than group C. No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios of recurrence and death among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early bisphosphonate treatment in PVO patients with osteoporosis was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of subsequent vertebral fracture at adjacent vertebral bodies and lower occurrence of subsequent surgery.

Preoperative bisphosphonate treatment may adversely affect the outcome after shoulder arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative bisphosphonate treatment on the intra- and postoperative outcomes of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The hypothesis was that previous bisphosphonate treatment would adversely affect both intra- and postoperative outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients undergoing arthroplasty of the shoulder, at a single institution. Two patients with no previous bisphosphonate treatment were matched to each patient who had received this treatment preoperatively by gender, age, race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and type of arthroplasty. Previous bisphosphonate treatment was defined as treatment occurring during the three-year period before the arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of intraoperative complications and those occurring at one and two years postoperatively. A total of 87 patients were included: 29 in the bisphosphonates-exposed (BP⁺) group and 58 in the non-exposed (BP^-) group. In the BP⁺ group, there were 26 female and three male patients, with a mean age of 71.4 years (51 to 87). In the BP^- group, there were 52 female and six male patients, with a mean age of 72.1 years (53 to 88).

RESULTS

Previous treatment with bisphosphonates was positively associated with intraoperative complications (fracture; odds ratio (OR) 39.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42 to 6305.70) and one-year postoperative complications (OR 7.83, 95% CI 1.11 to 128.82), but did not achieve statistical significance for complications two years postoperatively (OR 3.45, 95% CI 0.65 to 25.28). The power was 63% for complications at one year.

CONCLUSION

Patients who are treated with bisphosphonates during the three-year period before shoulder arthroplasty have a greater risk of intraoperative and one-year postoperative complications compared with those without this previous treatment.

Surgical Management of Atypical Femur Fractures Associated With Bisphosphonate Therapy

Atypical femur fractures associated with long-term bisphosphonate use can be challenging injuries to manage. Not only do they have a prolonged healing time and increased rate of nonunion as compared to typical femur fractures, intraoperative complications are not infrequent and can be catastrophic. Given the pathologic nature of these fractures, a multidisciplinary approach to the patient's care is necessary. Treatment begins with medical optimization and careful surgical planning. Radiographic characteristics of the fracture and femoral osteology dictate reduction strategy, adjunctive surgical techniques, and implant choice. Intraoperative complications including malreduction, iatrogenic fracture, and fracture propagation can be avoided with thoughtful planning. The purpose of this article is to discuss the technical aspects of surgical management of atypical femur fractures. We also discuss management of intraoperative complications and treatment failure. Finally, we provide an update on recommendations for postoperative medical treatment and management of the contralateral femur.

The Prevention of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a preventable complication of antiresorptive treatment. It arises in 1-20% of patients with bone metastases of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and in 0.1-2% of patients being treated for osteoporosis with bisphosphonates. Depending on the underlying disease and medication dosage, the risk of MRONJ can be elevated even in the first year of antiresorptive treatment. The treatment of MRONJ is difficult and often involves surgery of the jaw.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed publications retrieved by a selective search for literature on the prevention of MRONJ in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and with the aid of the Google Scholar search engine.

RESULTS

15 of 559 retrieved publications were included in the analysis. The quality of the evidence in the studies was generally moderate to low, with most of them being case series. In one case series of over 1200 patients with multiple myeloma, the incidence of MRONJ was lowered from 4.6% to 0.8% through regular dental checkups and improved oral hygiene. Tooth extraction, in particular, is associated with a high risk of MRONJ. In a retrospective study, 57% of patients who underwent tooth extraction without antibiotic prophylaxis developed MRONJ, compared to 0% with antibiotic prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Before antiresorptive medication is begun, oral hygiene should be improved. Moreover, it seems that perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and adequate plastic wound closure can often prevent MRONJ. In view of the fact that bisphosphonates can persist in bone for more than 15 years, patients should be thoroughly informed of the risk that antiresorptive treatment can cause MRONJ, and the measures discussed should be initiated.

Tomatidine suppresses osteoclastogenesis and mitigates estrogen deficiency-induced bone mass loss by modulating TRAF6-mediated signaling

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is initiated by estrogen withdrawal and is characterized mainly by overactivated osteoclastic bone resorption. Targeting TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) or its downstream signaling pathways to modulate osteoclast formation and function is an appealing strategy for osteoclast-related disorders. In the present study, we determined the effect of tomatidine, a steroidal alkaloid derived from Solanaceae, on the formation and function of receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) ligand-induced osteoclasts and the underlying mechanism. Tomatidine inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner and decreased the expression of osteoclast marker genes. Actin ring formation and osteoclastic bone resorption were attenuated in the presence of tomatidine in vitro. Eight weeks after ovariectomy, tomatidine prevented estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss and restored the mechanical properties of the femur. At the molecular level, tomatidine abrogated phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/p38, NF-κB, and protein kinase B (Akt) pathway proteins by suppressing RANK expression, inhibiting the binding of TRAF6 to RANK, and downregulating the osteoclastogenesis marker-related protein expression. In summary, these data demonstrated that tomatidine attenuated osteoclast formation and function by modulating multiple TRAF6-mediated pathways. Therefore, tomatidine could be a novel candidate for the treatment of osteoclast-related disorders, including osteoporosis.-Hu, B., Sun, X., Yang, Y., Ying, Z., Meng, J., Zhou, C., Jiang, G., Li, S., Wu, F., Zhao, X., Zhu, H., Wu, H., Cai, X., Shi, Z., Yan, S. Tomatidine suppresses osteoclastogenesis and mitigates estrogen deficiency-induced bone mass loss by modulating TRAF6-mediated signaling.

The biology of fracture healing in osteoporosis and in the presence of anti-osteoporotic drugs

Compromised bone strength in osteoporosis predisposes patients to an increased fracture risk. The management of these fractures is complicated due to the poor bone quality, which may lead to inadequate fixation strength and stability. While a number of studies using osteoporotic animal models have shown a detrimental impact on fracture healing, clinical evidence regarding whether fracture healing is impaired in the presence of osteoporosis is complicated by numerous associated conditions including advancing age. The mechanism of some anti-osteoporotic medications creates concern about a potential detrimental impact on fracture healing, while others appear to enhance fracture healing. The current evidence indicates that the beneficial effects of anti-osteoporosis treatment exceeds any concerns about possible adverse consequences on fracture healing in most circumstances.

Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines recent literature regarding the clinical management of fragility fractures, provides insight into new practice patterns, and discusses controversies in current management.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are declining rates of osteoporosis management following initial fragility fracture. Management of osteoporotic fractures via a multidisciplinary team reduces secondary fracture incidence and improves overall osteoporotic care. Anabolic agents (abaloparatide and teriparatide) are effective adjuvants to fracture repair, and have shown positive results in cases of re-fracture in spite of medical management (i.e., bisphosphonates). For AO 31-A1 and A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures (non-reverse obliquity), no clinical advantage of intramedullary fixation over the sliding hip screw (SHS) has been proven; SHS is more cost-effective. As fragility fracture incidence continues to rise, orthopedic surgeons must play a more central role in the care of osteoporotic patients. Initiation of pharmacologic intervention is key to preventing subsequent fragility fractures, and may play a supportive role in initial fracture healing. While the media bombards patients with complications of medical therapy (atypical femur fractures, osteonecrosis of jaw, myocardial infarction), providers need to understand and communicate the low incidence of these complications compared with consequences of not initiating medical therapy.

Outside the Bone: What Is Happening Systemically to Influence Fracture Healing?

This article summarizes presentations of a symposium on bone health-related hot topics of the 2016 Basic Science Focus Forum. Taken together, these topics emphasize the critical importance of bone health in fracture management, the systemic factors that influence fracture healing, and the need to focus on issues other than simply the technical aspects of fracture repair.

An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh

Purpose

To assess the utility of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database in objectively capturing adverse events for transvaginal mesh in the United States.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed 1,103 individual medical device reports submitted to the MAUDE database that inspired the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration's 2008 Public Health Notification. Entries were compiled into a categorical database that reported manufacturer, brand, reporter type, report source, and type of adverse event.

Results

There were numerous examples of missing, duplicated, and non-standardized entries. Analysis revealed 64 reports with duplicated information, and six reports representing multiple patients. Forty-seven percent of medical device reports did not identify a reporter source. At least 28% of reported devices are no longer on the US market. There was wide variability in the quality and completeness of submitted reports and true adverse event rates could not be accurately calculated because the number of total cases was unknown.

Conclusions

The MAUDE database was limited in its ability to collect, quantify, and standardize real-life adverse events related to transvaginal mesh. While it functions to collect information related to isolated adverse events, systematic limitations of the MAUDE database, that no doubt extend to other medical devices, necessitate the development of new reporting systems. Alternatives are under development, which may allow regulators to more accurately scrutinize the safety profiles of specific medical devices.

Incidence Rate of Atypical Femoral Fracture after Bisphosphonates Treatment in Korea

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been high-lightened, because it was associated with the long-term use of bisphosphonate. Comparing western countries, the incidence rate of AFF was unclear in East Asian patients. Our purposes were to estimate the incidence rate of radiologically defined AFF in Korea, and to determine the association between occurrence of AFF and long-term use of bisphosphonate.

METHODS

We conducted a hospital-based, retrospective cohort study in patients aged ≥ 45 years, who took bisphosphonate. The occurrence of AFF was estimated by using incidence rate, and the age-adjusted incidence rate to U.S. 2010 Census data. The association between occurrence of AFF and the duration of bisphosphonate use was examined. The cumulative probability of AFF was plotted per each duration of bisphosphonate use.

RESULTS

Among 10,338 individuals who took bisphosphonate, 13 patients with AFF following use of bisphosphonate were identified. The incidence rate was 85.9/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2-146.9), and age-adjusted incidence rate was 72.7/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 29.1-175.8). In Poisson regression analysis, higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with an increased risk of AFF (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.004-1.359). The cumulative probability of AFF increased abruptly when the duration of bisphosphonate use was 4 years or more.

CONCLUSION

Among Korean patients, the incidence rate of AFF was on a par with those of western countries, and this can provide basic information to conduct further studies by evaluating risk and benefit of continuing bisphosphonate.