Utility of Distal Forearm DXA as a Screening Tool for Primary Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Case-Control Study

Trabecular bone score to assess bone microarchitecture in end-stage renal disease patients

RATIONALE

This study evaluates TBS for estimating bone microarchitecture in ESRD patients using HR-pQCT as the reference technique.

MAIN RESULTS

TBS correlates significantly with vBMD and bone microarchitecture, unlike aBMD.

SIGNIFICANCE

TBS may complement bone health assessment in ESRD patients by offering additional information alongside aBMD.

PURPOSE

Given the high fracture risk, non-invasive techniques for assessing bone fragility in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain important. Trabecular bone score (TBS) may provide additional information that could help guide treatment and follow-up decisions. The aim of this study is to investigate whether TBS reflects bone microarchitecture in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) as the reference technique. Additionally, we aim to identify parameters associated with a low TBS.

METHODS

Seventy-five ESRD patients were included at the time of kidney transplantation (KTx). Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was analyzed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). TBS was assessed from the L1-L4 area during DXA. Volumetric BMD (vBMD) and bone microarchitecture at tibia and radius sites were analyzed using HR-pQCT.

RESULTS

In ESRD patients, those with TBS < 1.370 were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI). In contrast to T-score-based classification (≤ -2.5 or > -2.5), low TBS was linked to significantly lower trabecular and cortical vBMD, reduced trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and trabecular number (Tb.N), and increased trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). In multivariate analysis, older age, higher BMI, and lower Tb.N remained independently associated with low TBS, while no HR-pQCT parameters were linked to low aBMD (T-score ≤ -2.5).

CONCLUSION

TBS correlates with both trabecular and cortical parameters measured by HR-pQCT, potentially offering a complementary perspective on bone microstructure compared to aBMD. At the time of KTx, a low TBS appears to better discriminate patients with significantly lower vBMD than aBMD alone.

The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for osteoporosis diagnosis do not recommend forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a standard tool, except in specific cases. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the potential correlation between forearm BMD and BMD at the lumbar and/or hip sites.

METHODS

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024568756), and the study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Major databases were systematically searched from their inception until August 2024 to identify studies evaluating the ability of forearm DXA scans to detect osteoporosis, particularly in comparison to central sites like the femoral neck and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that reported correlation coefficients between these measurements. Quality assessment was conducted independently by 3 reviewers following Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria. Additionally, a narrative synthesis of the main findings across different patient groups was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. Published between 1992 and 2023, these studies involved 5941 participants. Forearm scans exhibited strong correlations with lumbar and femoral sites (pooled effect size 0.603, 95%CI 0.579-0.627 and 0.641, 95%IC 0.600-0.680, respectively) demonstrating good predictive value for central osteoporosis. Despite some result variations, forearm DXA scanning emerged as a valid method, especially when lumbar and femoral measures are challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

A DXA scan of the distal forearm proves to be a valuable supplementary tool for identifying osteoporotic conditions. This could be particularly relevant in older patients, where conducting lumbar or hip scans is often challenging or not feasible.

New Challenges: Use and Interpretation of Radius Bone Mineral Density

CONTEXT

It is unknown if isolated low bone mineral density (BMD) "osteoporosis" at the radius is associated with increased fracture risk, not only at the wrist but elsewhere, and whether it reflects more generalized skeletal fragility.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to review the association of radius BMD and fracture risk, the epidemiology of wrist fractures, isolated osteoporosis at the radius, and the concordance between radial BMD and femoral neck BMD.

METHODS

We completed a narrative literature review on radius BMD and fracture risk and current recommendations for measurement of radial BMD. We updated results of radial BMD and fracture results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures over 20 years and examined the concordance of BMD at the distal and proximal radius with femoral neck BMD T scores.

RESULTS

Radius BMD is a robust predictor of all types of fractures including hip and wrist but there is insufficient evidence to suggest that radius BMD predicts wrist fractures better than fractures at other sites. Fractures of the wrist tend to occur in younger, healthier women compared with hip and spine fractures. Nevertheless, wrist fractures are associated with an increased risk of future fractures and represent a missed opportunity for intervention. On a population level, the discordance between radius BMD and femoral neck BMD is small. But women with isolated osteoporosis at the radius had biochemical and microarchitecture deterioration that were similar to women with hip osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

Future research should address the clinical implications of isolated osteoporosis at the radius and whether treatment is warranted.

Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery

Patient-centric decision-making has imbued all aspects of health care, including spine surgery. This review describes how spine surgeons can use evolving technologies and knowledge of disease and pain states to tailor their surgical approach to the individual patient. This includes preoperative screening for and optimization of low bone mineral density, intraoperative selection of implant material and customization of interbody cages and screws, and postoperative personalization of pain regimens and rehabilitation courses. By working in a multidisciplinary fashion, spine surgeons can avail themselves of these advances to provide individualized care.

Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women

Bone mineral density measured at the ultra-distal forearm site was associated with any fracture, as well as distal radius fracture in women from a longitudinal cohort study.

PURPOSE

Femoral neck (BMDhip) and lumbar spine (BMDspine) bone mineral density (BMD) are routinely used to assess fracture risk. More data are needed to understand how ultra-distal forearm BMD (BMDUDforearm) may assist fracture prediction.

METHODS

Using a Lunar DPX-L, Geelong Osteoporosis Study women (n = 1026), aged 40-90 years, had BMD measured. Incident low-trauma fractures were radiologically verified. Using Cox proportional hazard models, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for BMDUDforearm as a continuous variable (expressed as a one-unit decrease in T-score) and a categorical variable (normal/osteopenia/osteoporosis). Areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curves were calculated. Analyses were conducted for any fracture and distal radius fractures.

RESULTS

During 14,270 person-years of follow-up, there were 318 fractures (85 distal radius). In adjusted models, continuous BMDUDforearm was associated with any (HR 1.26;95%CI 1.15-1.39) and distal radius fractures (HR 1.59;95%CI 1.38-1.83). AUROCs for continuous BMDUDforearm, 33% forearm(BMD33%forearm), BMDhip, BMDspine, and FRAX without BMD were similar for any fracture (p > 0.05). For distal radius fracture, the AUROC for BMDUDforearm was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05). In adjusted models, those with osteoporosis had a higher likelihood of any fracture (HR 2.12; 95%CI 1.50-2.98). For distal radius fractures, both osteopenia and osteoporosis had a higher risk (HR 4.31; 95%CI 2.59-7.15 and 4.81; 95%CI 2.70-8.58). AUROCs for any fracture were similar for categorical BMD at all sites but lower for FRAX (p < 0.05). For distal radius fractures, the AUROC for BMDUDforearm, was higher than other sites and FRAX (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultra-distal forearm BMD may aid risk assessments for any distal radius fractures.

Opportunistic hand radiographs to screen for low forearm bone mineral density: a prospective and retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Low bone mineral density affects 53% of women over age 65 in the US, yet many are unaware and remain untreated. Underdiagnosis of forearm osteoporosis and related fragility fractures represent missed warning signs of more deadly, future fractures. This study aimed to determine if hand radiographs could serve as early, simple screening tools for predicting low forearm bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

We evaluated posterior-anterior (PA) hand radiographs (x-rays) and Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of 43 participants. The ratio of the intramedullary cavity to total cortical diameter of the second metacarpal (second metacarpal cortical percentage (2MCP)) was used as a potential diagnostic marker. Mixed-effects linear regression was performed to determine correlation of 2MCP with BMD from various anatomic regions. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare BMD across sites. An optimal 2MCP cutoff for predicting forearm osteopenia and osteoporosis was found using Receiver Operating Curves.

RESULTS

2MCP is directly correlated with BMD in the forearm. The optimal 2MCP of 48.3% had 80% sensitivity for detecting osteoporosis of the 1/3 distal forearm. An 2MCP cutoff of 50.8% had 84% sensitivity to detect osteoporosis of the most distal forearm. Both 2MCP cutoffs were more sensitive at predicting forearm osteoporosis than femoral neck T-scores.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the expansion of osteoporosis screening to include low-cost hand x-rays, aiming to increase diagnosis and treatment of low forearm BMD and fractures. Proposed next steps include confirming the optimal 2MCP cutoff at scale and integrating automatic 2MCP measurements into PAC systems.

Osteoporosis Prediction Using Machine-Learned Optical Bone Densitometry Data

Optical bone densitometry (OBD) has been developed for the early detection of osteoporosis. In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have been actively implemented for the areas of medical diagnosis and screening with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study was to verify the feasibility of using the combination of OBD and ML techniques as a screening tool for osteoporosis. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and OBD measurements were performed on 203 Thai subjects. From the OBD measurements and readily available demographic data, machine learning techniques were used to predict the T-score measured by the DXA. The T-score predicted using the Ridge regressor had a correlation of r = 0.512 with respect to the reference value. The predicted T-score also showed an AUC of 0.853 for discriminating individuals with osteoporosis. The results obtained suggest that the developed model is reliable enough to be used for screening for osteoporosis.

The effect of forearm rotation on the bone mineral density measurements of the distal radius

INTRODUCTION

Forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is often performed in clinics where central DXA is unavailable. Accurate bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is crucial for clinical assessment. Forearm rotation can affect BMD measurements, but this effect remains uncertain. Thus, we aimed to conduct a simulation study using CT images to clarify the effect of forearm rotation on BMD measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forearm CT images of 60 women were analyzed. BMD was measured at the total, ultra-distal (UD), mid-distal (MD), and distal 33% radius regions with the radius located at the neutral position using digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from CT images. Then, the rotation was altered from - 30° to 30° (supination set as positive) with a one-degree increment, and the percent BMD changes from the neutral position were quantified for all regions at each angle for each patient.

RESULTS

The maximum mean BMD changes were 5.8%, 7.0%, 6.2%, and 7.2% for the total, UD, MD, and distal 33% radius regions, respectively. The analysis of the absolute values of the percent BMD changes from the neutral position showed that BMD changes of all patients remained within 2% when the rotation was between - 5° and 7° for the total region, between - 3° and 2° for the UD region, between - 4° and 3° for the MD region, and between - 3° and 1° for the distal 33% radius region.

CONCLUSION

Subtle rotational changes affected the BMD measurement of each region. The results showed the importance of forearm positioning when measuring the distal radius BMD.

Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis

Purpose

This pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility of scanning the human distal radius bone marrow in vivo to detect osteoporosis-related changes using magnetic resonance and evaluate whether the radius may serve as an accessible probing site for osteoporosis. This may lead in the future to the use of affordable means such as low-field MRI scanners for the monitoring of disease progression.

Methods

A clinical trial was performed using a 3T MR scanner, including 26 women assigned into three study groups: healthy-premenopausal (n = 7; mean age 48.6 ± 3.5 years), healthy-postmenopausal (n = 10; mean age 54.5 ± 5.6 years), and osteoporotic-postmenopausal (n = 9; mean age 61.3 ± 5.6 years). Marrow fat composition was evaluated using T2 maps, a two-compartment model of T1, and a Dixon pulse sequence.

Results

The osteoporotic group exhibited higher fat content than the other two groups and lower T2 values than the healthy-premenopausal group.

Conclusions

Osteoporosis-related changes in the composition of the distal radius bone marrow may be detected in vivo using MRI protocols. The scanning protocols chosen here can later be repeated using low-field MRI scanners, thus offering the potential for early detection and treatment monitoring, using an accessible, affordable means that may be applied in small clinics. This trial is registered with MOH_2018-05-23_002247, NCT03742362.

Improving DXA Quality by Avoiding Common Technical and Diagnostic Pitfalls: Part 1

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an accurate means to assess bone mineral density, determine the risk of a fragility fracture, and monitor response to therapy. Despite its seemingly straightforward nature-the review of 2-to-3 nondiagnostic images and a few automatically generated numbers-the proper performance and interpretation of DXA can often be complex. It is complex because it is highly dependent on many factors, such as image acquisition, processing, analysis, and subsequent examination interpretation. Each step is subject to potential errors, artifacts, and diagnostic pitfalls; hence, meticulous attention must be paid to the technique by both the technologist and the interpreting physician to provide high-quality results and, in turn, maximize the examination's clinical utility. This article is part 1 of a 2-part series. Part 1 will begin with a review of bone physiology and osteoporosis etiology, followed by a discussion of the principles underlying DXA and the technical procedure. Part 2 will focus on DXA interpretation and discuss scanning pitfalls and clues to recognizing issues and improving scan quality.

Occupational Performance 1 Year After a Distal Radius Fracture From the Perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

IMPORTANCE

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) frequently compromise independent functioning.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze occupational performance post-DRF using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and related interviews, guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). COPM score was compared with standard metrics: Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Participation Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ).

METHOD

Through a semistructured COPM interview, participants highlighted self-care, productivity, and leisure. They completed the PRWE and PBQ, linking results to ICF sets.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Outpatient hand surgery clinic at a trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N = 120), 1 yr post-DRF.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incorporated COPM, PRWE, and PBQ, linked to ICF.

RESULTS

Analysis identified 73 codes, aligning with 30 ICF Hand Conditions codes. Main concerns related to self-care (15.21%), leisure (12.16%), and productivity (16.22%). Major challenges pertained to domestic (67.00%) and civic life (64.53%) within ICF. Occupational performance was positively correlated with participation (r = .62) and inversely with disability (r = -.62).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

DRFs result in varied occupational challenges that are not always reflected in standard measures. The COPM offers a comprehensive insight into post-DRF patient challenges, emphasizing the value of diverse clinical assessment approaches. What This Article Adds: This study highlights the importance of a holistic approach in occupational therapy for DRF patients, revealing that standard measurements might overlook key challenges that they face. By adopting broader evaluative methods, occupational therapists can better address patient-specific needs and enhance their rehabilitation outcomes.

The clinical necessity of a distal forearm DEXA scan for predicting distal radius fracture in elderly females: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that the distal forearm dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan might be a better method for screening bone mineral density (BMD) and the risk of a distal forearm fracture, compared with a central DEXA scan. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a distal forearm DEXA scan for predicting the occurrence of a distal radius fracture (DRF) in elderly females who were not initially diagnosed with osteoporosis after a central DEXA scan.

METHODS

Among the female patients who visited our institutes and who were over 50 years old and underwent DEXA scans at 3 sites (lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm), 228 patients with DRF (group 1) and 228 propensity score-matched patients without fractures (group 2) were included in this study. The patients' general characteristics, BMD, and T-scores were compared. The odds ratios (OR) of each measurement and correlation ratio among BMD values of the different sites were evaluated.

RESULTS

The distal forearm T-score of the elderly females with DRF (group 1) was significantly lower than that of the control group (group 2) (p < 0.001 for the one-third radius and ultradistal radius measurements). BMD measured during the distal forearm DEXA scan was a better predictor of DRF risk than BMD measured during the central DEXA (OR = 2.33; p = 0.031 for the one-third radius, and OR = 3.98; p < 0.001 for the ultradistal radius). The distal one-third radius BMD was correlated with hip BMD, rather than lumbar BMD (p < 0.05 in each group).

CONCLUSION

Performing a distal forearm DEXA scan in addition to a central DEXA scan appears to be clinically significant for detecting the low BMD in the distal radius, which is associated with osteoporotic DRF in elderly females.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Bone mineral density of the ultra-distal radius: are we ignoring valuable information?

The current study explored the possible utilization in dual-X-ray-absorptiometry scanning (DXA) of the ultra-distal radius (UDR). This region of interest is currently unused and mostly unstudied in this context. The study findings suggest UDR as potential useful region of interest in DXA scanning and warrant further study of the site.

PURPOSE

Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of a non-dominant arm is not routinely performed during dual-X-ray-absorptiometry (DXA) test, and the possible utility of ultra-distal (UDR) radius BMD is not well-studied. We evaluated in women, correlations of UDR BMD with fracture prevalence, fracture risk prediction by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), and osteoporosis diagnosed by traditional sites.

METHODS

Women who underwent a routine DXA (including their non-dominant forearm and including UDR BMD) in a tertiary medical center were included. Risk factors relevant to FRAX calculation were assessed via a self-administered questionnaire. Spearman correlations of UDR BMD to 10-year risks of major osteoporotic and hip fractures (assessed by FRAX) were explored. The possible added value of UDR BMD in explaining prevalent osteoporotic fractures was assessed using a multivariable regression model incorporating age and traditional osteoporosis diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study included 1245 women with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 59-73), of whom 298 (24%) had UDR T-score ≤  - 2.5 and 154 (12%) reported prior fractures. UDR BMD was significantly negatively correlated with FRAX risk score for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (R =  - 0.5 and R =  - 0.41, respectively; P < 0.001). UDR T-score ≤  - 2.5 was associated with higher fracture prevalence (19% vs 10%; P < 0.001) and remained significant after adjusting for traditional BMD and age (OR 1.49, 1.01-2.19; P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

UDR BMD correlates both with prior fractures and with predicted fracture risks and might pose added value over traditional DXA sites.

Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization

Objective

Many potential predictors have been identified and proposed for predicting late reduction loss in distal radius fractures. However, no report exists on whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm correlates with the loss of reduction in distal radius fractures. This study aimed to investigate whether forearm BMD can be used as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization.

Methods

Ninety patients with distal radius fractures were divided into two groups according to the maintenance or loss of reduction evaluated from radiographs taken at least 6 weeks after their injury. Lumbar and forearm BMD (total and metaphysis) T-scores were measured and compared between the maintenance of reduction (MOR) group and the loss of reduction (LOR) group. Additionally, serologic markers (C-terminal telopeptide, osteocalcin, vitamin D) and radiologic risk factors (intra-articular fracture, ulnar fracture, dorsal comminuted fracture, volar hook) were evaluated and a logistic multiple regression analysis was performed to know the main risk factors of reduction loss.

Results

Reduction loss was observed in 38 patients (42.2%). The total and metaphyseal BMD of the forearm was less in the LOR group than in the MOR group. However, the difference was not statistically significant [−2.9 vs. −2.5 for total (p = 0.18), −2.3 vs. −2.0 for metaphysis (p = 0.17)]. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed initial dorsal comminution (p = 0.008) and ulnar variance (p = 0.01) were the main risk factors for reduction loss.

Conclusions

Forearm BMD was not a valuable prognostic factor for reduction loss in distal radius fractures. Initial dorsal comminution and ulnar variance rather than forearm BMD should be considered preferentially when predicting which patients are at high risk of reduction loss in distal radius fractures.

Insulin resistance and skeletal health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bone fragility is a complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and insulin resistance is suspected to contribute to diabetes-related bone deficits. This article provides an overview of emerging clinical research involving insulin resistance and bone health by summarizing recent publications, identifying existing knowledge gaps, and suggesting 'next steps' for this evolving field of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies in children and adults report greater bone density in people with increased insulin resistance, but these associations are often attenuated when adjusting for body size. Advancements in bone imaging methods allow for assessment of nuanced characteristics of bone quality and strength that extend beyond standard bone mineral density assessment methods. For example, several recent studies focusing on lumbar spine trabecular bone score, a relatively new measure of trabecular bone quality from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, have reported generally consistent inverse associations with insulin resistance. Longitudinal studies using advanced imaging methods capable of evaluating trabecular bone microstructure and strength, such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, are lacking. Studies in younger individuals are sparse, but emerging data suggest that peak bone mass attainment might be threatened by diabetes progression, and increased visceral fat, suppressed muscle-bone unit, advanced glycation end-products, sedentary lifestyle, and poor diet quality might contribute to diabetes effects on bone. Prospective studies during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood are required.

SUMMARY

Insulin resistance is a main feature of T2D, which is suspected to contribute to subclinical diabetes-related threats to bone health. Future clinical studies should focus on the critical years surrounding peak bone mass and peak bone strength attainment using contemporary imaging techniques.

Clinical Characteristics and Fracture Patterns Among Postmenopausal Women with Isolated Osteoporosis at the Forearm

Patients found to have isolated osteoporosis at the 1/3 radius (1/3RO) represent a therapeutic dilemma. It is unknown whether 1/3RO is associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures, and is therefore unclear whether these patients should be treated similarly to those with osteoporosis at central sites. This retrospective study investigated the clinical significance of 1/3RO by comparing medical history, fracture prevalence, areal BMD, and Trabecular Bone Score in postmenopausal women with 1/3RO (n = 107) to age-matched women with osteoporosis at the hip and/or spine (PMO, n = 214), and to controls without osteoporosis at any site (n = 214). We then compared the clinical and densitometric characteristics among women with 1/3RO according to fracture history. The mean age of the 535 women included in the study was 71 ± 8 yr. Women with 1/3RO had BMD in the osteopenic range at all other sites (mean spine T-score = -1.0, total hip = -1.4, femoral neck = -1.7). Women with 1/3RO reported similar calcium and vitamin D intake, prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease, and other comorbidities compared to the other groups. The prevalence of an osteoporotic fracture of the spine, hip, wrist, or humerus tended to be higher among women with PMO compared to 1/3RO or controls (PMO: 31%, 1/3RO: 21%, Controls: 23%, p = 0.07). Among women with 1/3RO, fracture prevalence was related to older age. No other clinical characteristic distinguished women with and without fracture. Neither BMD at other sites nor TBS differed according to fracture history. Among postmenopausal women with 1/3RO, those who are older are at an increased risk of fracture, even when T-scores at other sites are well above the osteoporosis threshold. Additional research is needed to confirm our results, and to assess whether treatment should be considered to reduce fracture risk in older women with 1/3RO.

The Impact of Diabetes on Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Fracture Risk After Primary Fragility Fractures: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Rates of osteoporosis evaluation and management after primary fragility fractures have remained low in recent years. The extent to which this treatment gap affects patients with diabetes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of secondary fractures and rates of osteoporosis diagnosis and management after sentinel fractures in patients with and without diabetes.

METHODS

A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients aged 50 years and older with primary fragility fractures of the hip, wrist, spine, pelvis, humerus, and other locations were identified. Rates of secondary fractures, dual radiograph absorptiometry (DXA) scans, charted osteoporosis diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions), and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy within 2 years were compared for patients with and without diabetes using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Matching yielded 27,052 patients in each cohort. Index humerus fractures were more common in the diabetic cohort (15.0% versus 11.6%, P < 0.001), whereas wrist fractures were more prevalent among the nondiabetic cohort (15.2% versus 19.3%, P < 0.001). Incidence of secondary fractures at 2 years was higher for diabetic patients than nondiabetic patients (5.2% versus 4.7%; odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.17). Diabetic patients were significantly less likely to receive a DXA scan (13.2% versus 13.5%; OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.98), be diagnosed with osteoporosis (9.3% versus 11.9%; OR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.82), or start pharmacotherapy (8.1% versus 8.7; OR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Despite diabetes being a well-established risk factor for fragility fractures, diabetic patients were significantly less likely to receive DXA scan evaluation, be formally diagnosed with osteoporosis, or be treated with osteoporosis pharmacotherapy after a sentinel fragility fracture. Incidence of secondary fractures within 2 years was also higher among diabetic patients.

Best Performance Parameters of HR-pQCT to Predict Fragility Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and bone structural deterioration that may result in fragility fractures. Use of bone imaging modalities to accurately predict fragility fractures is always an important issue, yet the current gold standard of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis of osteoporosis cannot fully satisfy this purpose. The latest high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a three-dimensional (3D) imaging device to measure not only volumetric bone density, but also the bone microarchitecture in a noninvasive manner that may provide a better fracture prediction power. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate which HR-pQCT parameters at the distal radius and/or distal tibia could best predict fragility fractures. A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science with relevant keywords by two independent reviewers. Original clinical studies using HR-pQCT to predict fragility fractures with available full text in English were included. Information was extracted from the included studies for further review. In total, 25 articles were included for the systematic review, and 16 articles for meta-analysis. HR-pQCT was shown to significantly predict incident fractures and/or major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). Of all the HR-pQCT parameters, our meta-analysis revealed that cortical volumetric bone mineral density (Ct.vBMD), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and stiffness were better predictors. Meanwhile, HR-pQCT parameters indicated better performance in predicting MOFs than incident fractures. Between the two standard measurement sites of HR-pQCT, the non-weight-bearing distal radius was a more preferable site than distal tibia for fracture prediction. Furthermore, most of the included studies were white-based, whereas very few studies were from Asia or South America. These regions should build up their densitometric databases and conduct related prediction studies. It is expected that HR-pQCT can be used widely for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and prediction of future fragility fractures. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Bone resorption of the greater tuberosity after open reduction and internal fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures: fragment characteristics and intraoperative risk factors

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND

In complex proximal humeral fractures, bone resorption of the greater tuberosity is sometimes observed after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, this has not been well characterized, and risk factors for resorption are not completely understood. We aimed (1) to identify the risk factors associated with bone resorption of the greater tuberosity and (2) to quantify the geometric and bone density characteristics associated with bone resorption using 3-dimensional computed tomography models in complex proximal humeral fractures treated with ORIF.

METHODS

We identified a retrospective cohort of 136 patients who underwent ORIF of 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures; greater tuberosity resorption developed after ORIF in 30 of these patients. We collected demographic, fracture-related, and surgery-related characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with the development of greater tuberosity resorption. Furthermore, we identified 30 age- and sex-matched patients by use of propensity score matching to perform quantitative fragment-specific analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomography models. After the fragment of the greater tuberosity was identified, the number of fragments, the relative fragment volume to the humeral head, and the relative bone density to the coracoid process were calculated. Measurements were compared between matched case-control groups.

RESULTS

We found that an unreduced greater tuberosity (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; P < .001), inadequate medial support at the calcar (OR, 15.0; P < .001), and the use of an intramedullary fibular strut (OR, 4.5; P = .018) were independently associated with a higher risk of bone resorption. Quantitative fragment-specific analysis showed that greater tuberosities with a larger number of fragments (5 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 2, P = .021), smaller fragments (9.9% ± 3.8% vs. 18.6% ± 4.7%, P < .001), and fragments with a lower bone density (66.4% ± 14.3% vs. 88.0% ± 18.4%, P = .001) had higher rates of resorption.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

An unreduced greater tuberosity or inadequate medial support increases the risk of greater tuberosity resorption, as do a larger number of fracture fragments, smaller fragments, and lower bone density. Additionally, fibular strut grafting is an independent risk factor for tuberosity resorption. Further study is needed, but alternatives to strut grafting such as femoral head allograft may warrant serious consideration.

Rates of Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Preventative Treatment After Primary Fragility Fractures

Fragility fractures are often sentinel events in documenting new cases of osteoporosis. Numerous analyses have demonstrated low rates of adequate osteoporosis evaluation and treatment following primary fragility fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of primary fragility fractures in America and the rates of osteoporosis screening and management before and after fracture.