Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly

Increasing incidences of acetabular, pelvic, and proximal femur fractures in The Netherlands

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate incidence rates of acetabular, pelvic, and proximal femur fractures in The Netherlands over a 10-year period (2012-2022). With an aging population, understanding trends in these osteoporotic fractures is essential for improving patient outcomes and guiding healthcare strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from two national databases, forming a 'hospitalised' and an 'all patients' cohort. The study population included patients diagnosed with acetabular, pelvic, and proximal femur fractures in The Netherlands during the study period. Incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 person-years and linear regression was used to assess temporal trends. Age-adjustments were performed using Dutch population data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). Comparative analyses between the two cohorts were conducted to identify discrepancies.

RESULTS

A total of 283,991 patients were identified (12,020 acetabular, 70,595 pelvic and 201,376 proximal femur fractures). Of these patients, 159,563 were hospitalised (7123 acetabular, 24,192 pelvic, and 128,252 proximal femur fractures). Incidence rates of acetabular fractures increased by 26 % (hospitalised) and 98 % (all patients), while pelvic fractures showed stagnation in hospitalised patients (-0.13 %) but a 44 % rise in all patients. Proximal femur fractures increased by 5 % (hospitalised) and 15 % (all patients). Significant differences between the databases were noted across all fracture types.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of acetabular, pelvic, and proximal femur fractures has significantly increased in the last decade, most notably in acetabular and pelvic fractures. Furthermore, a shift toward out-patient treatment of acetabular and pelvic fractures was found. These findings highlight the need for improved fracture prevention and out-patient management strategies, while also underscoring the need for a nationwide registration for these injuries.

Finite Element Analysis of a 3D-Printed Acetabular Prosthesis for an Acetabular Defect According to the Paprosky Classification

The treatment of Paprosky Type III acetabular defects is a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, as standard components often do not fit properly. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical efficacy of a custom 3D-printed PEEK acetabular prosthesis compared to a conventional titanium implant. A 3D model of the pelvis was created using a computed tomography scanner and a custom-made acetabular implant was designed. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed using Ansys Workbench to evaluate the stress and strain distribution of two materials on the pelvic bone. The results showed that the titanium prosthesis model had less strain transmitted to the bone, while the PEEK model had better stress transmission and bone stimulation. The use of custom implants reduced the risk of stress shielding, potentially improving long-term bone health. Three-dimensional-printed acetabular prostheses therefore offer significant advantages over traditional implants, suggesting improved implant stability and reduced failure rates.

Similar Medium-Term Revision Rates Following Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

The management of elderly acetabular fractures is complex, with high rates of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but potentially higher rates of complications after acute THA.

METHODS

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database was queried between 2010 and 2017 for all patients aged 60 years or older who sustained a closed, isolated acetabular fracture and underwent ORIF, THA, or a combination. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to identify demographic differences between groups. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate predictors of 30-day readmission and 90-day complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the revision surgery-free survival (revision-free survival [RFS]), with revision surgery defined as conversion THA, revision ORIF, or revision THA.

RESULTS

A total of 2,184 surgically managed acetabular fractures in elderly patients were identified, with 1,637 (75.0%) undergoing ORIF and 547 (25.0%) undergoing THA with or without ORIF. Median follow-up was 295 days (interquartile range, 13 to 1720 days). 99.4% of revisions following ORIF were for conversion arthroplasty. Unadjusted KM analysis showed no difference in RFS between ORIF and THA (log-rank test P = 0.27). RFS for ORIF patients was 95.1%, 85.8%, 78.3%, and 71.4% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. RFS for THA patients was 91.6%, 88.9%, 87.2%, and 78.8% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. Roughly 50% of revisions occurred within the first year postoperatively (49% for ORIF, 52% for THA). In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference between RFS on KM analysis ( P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was observed in medium-term RFS between acute THA and ORIF for elderly acetabular fractures in California. Revision surgeries for either conversion or revision THA were relatively common in both groups, with roughly half of all revisions occurring within the first year postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Revision Surgery Risk After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

The aging population has contributed to a rising incidence of acetabular fractures in older patients, yet current evidence guiding surgical treatment is limited by small sample sizes. This study used a nationwide database to investigate outcomes in older patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus acute total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was queried for patients aged 60 years and older with an acute acetabular fracture who underwent ORIF or acute THA (2010 to 2021). ORIF patients were matched 1:1 to THA patients based on age, sex, US region, insurance plan, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was revision surgery.

RESULTS

Of 120,032 patients with an acetabular fracture, 3,768 (3.1%) underwent surgical treatment: 1,482 (39.3%) THA and 2,286 (60.7%) ORIF. Mean age was 71.0 ± 6.51 years. Mean follow-up duration was 5.2 ± 2.1 years. THA patients were slightly older (72.4 versus 70.2 years), had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (3.3 versus 2.7), and had a higher percentage of female patients (62.5% versus 32.2%). After matching, 962 ORIF and 962 THA patients were included. ORIF patients had longer LOS (10.7 versus 8.1 days). ORIF patients were less likely to experience joint infections and periprosthetic fractures, but more likely to experience transfusions. The overall revision surgery rate within 10 years was 14.8% in the ORIF cohort and 6.2% in the THA cohort. In the ORIF cohort, 13.5% of patients had a delayed conversion to THA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national database, acute with or without internal fixation for geriatric acetabular fractures was associated with lower rates of revision surgery within 10 years when compared with a matched cohort undergoing ORIF. ORIF was associated with increased LOS, increased transfusion risk, and lower risk of joint infection and periprosthetic fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Management of geriatric acetabular fractures: Contemporary treatment strategies

Acetabular fractures in the geriatric population are typically low-energy fractures resulting from a fall from standing height. Compromised bone quality in the elderly, as well as this population's concomitant medical comorbidities, render the management of such fractures challenging and controversial. Non-operative management remains the mainstay of treatment, although such a choice is associated with numerous and serious complications related to both the hip joint as well as the general condition of the patient. On the other hand, operatively treating acetabular fractures (e.g., with osteosynthesis or total hip arthroplasty) is gaining popularity. Osteosynthesis can be performed with open reduction and internal fixation or with minimally invasive techniques. Total hip arthroplasty could be performed either in the acute phase combined with osteosynthesis or as a delayed procedure after a period of non-operative management or after failed osteosynthesis of the acetabulum. Regardless of the implemented treatment, orthogeriatric co-management is considered extremely crucial, and it is currently one of the pillars of a successful outcome after an acetabular fracture.

Epidemiology of acetabular fractures in elderly patients and the effect of various management options on the outcomes. A comprehensive narrative review

Owing to the expected increase in the world's elderly population (>65 years old), and the concomitant osteoporosis in this particular population, fragility fractures of the pelvis and the acetabulum is becoming a real concern, which could be life-threatening. In the current review, we aimed to discuss the various epidemiological characteristics of geriatric acetabular fractures, management options, and the outcomes. For the review synthesis, we searched PubMed to select the most relevant and updated articles published from various areas and institutions. Geriatric acetabular fractures are mainly caused by trivial trauma, constitute about 1.5%-3% of all skeletal injuries, and showed a 2.4-fold increase over the past three decades. Furthermore, these fractures' associated one-year mortality rate ranges from 14% to 25%. Management options differ largely according to the type and severity of the injury if there is an associated skeletal or non-skeletal injury, and preexisting patient comorbidities. These options could be nonoperative or operative (including surgical fixation and acute total hip arthroplasty), and both carry a specific risk in this vulnerable age group. There is controversy among various reports regarding the best management option leading to better function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. In conclusion, the incidence of acetabular fractures in elderly patients is rising. The decision-making on the best management option should consider the patient's fragility, injury severity, poor bone quality, and multiple medical comorbidities. The outcomes related to function, quality of life, and mortality are comparable between operative and nonoperative management options.

Acute total hip replacement by direct anterior approach combined with intrapelvic fixation for geriatric acetabular fracture of the anterior column

Management of anterior column acetabular fracture in the elderly is challenging. Open reduction and internal fixation do not allow early weight bearing and are associated with a high risk of failure compared to younger patients. Therefore, acute fixation and total hip arthroplasty may be an option. This technical note describes a combined procedure: anterior intrapelvic approach for fracture fixation and a direct anterior approach to the hip for THR. Fracture reduction and arthroplasty were achievable in all five patients. The mean operative time was 289min, and the mean blood loss was 2120mL. At short term, no complication was noticed. Combining these two "muscle-sparing" approaches could help manage anterior column fractures in elderly patients. Level of evidence: IV.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of antegrade posterior column screw fixation of the acetabulum

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade posterior column screw fixation (APCS) provides stable fixation while reducing the complications related to dual acetabular approaches. The objective of this study was to present the radiological and clinical outcomes of fixation of the posterior column of the acetabulum through a single anterior approach.

HYPOTHESIS

APCS will produce better clinical and radiological outcomes relative to not placing any screws in the posterior column.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study of 69 patients operated through a single anterior approach for a both-column fracture of the acetabulum between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups (APCS+, n=24 and APCS-, n=45) depending on whether the posterior column was fixed with an antegrade lag screw or not. The radiological outcomes were defined by the quality of the reduction according to Matta. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip score and Merle Postel D'Aubigné (MDP) score at the final assessment. A sequential hierarchical analysis was done with a Chi² test for the radiological criterion and Student's t test for the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In the APCS+ group, the reduction was anatomical in 71% (17/24) of patients, imperfect in 12% (3/24) and poor in 17% (4/24). In the APCS- group, the reduction was anatomical in 33% (15/45) of patients, imperfect in 31% (14/45) and poor in 35% (16/45). This difference between groups was statistically significant (p=.012). The differences between groups in the Harris (p=.201) and MDP (p>.05) scores were not significant. Mean irradiation in the APCS+ group was significantly higher (114.8 cGy.cm^-2) relative to the APCS- group (39.8 cGy.cm^-2) (p<.001). None of the patients in the APCS+ group underwent a subsequent total hip arthroplasty, while 8 patients from the APCS- group did (p=.031). The differences in the postoperative complications were not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

APCS yields satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes without increasing the complication rate; this must be balanced out against the additional irradiation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Fragility Fractures of the Acetabulum: Current Concepts for Improving Patients' Outcomes

The incidence of fragility fractures of the acetabulum (FFA) is constantly increasing. Generally, these fractures are related to a fall on the greater trochanter involving the anterior column. The management of FFA is extremely difficult considering both patients' comorbidities and poor bone quality. Both non-operative and several operative treatment protocols are available, and the choice among them is still ambiguous. The proposed surgical techniques for FFA [namely open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), percutaneous fixation and total hip arthroplasty (THA)] are associated with a high complication rate. The treatment with the higher early mortality is the ORIF + THA, while the one with the lowest is the non-operative. However, at longer follow-up, this difference dreadfully change is becoming the opposite. Frequently ORIF, percutaneous fixation, and non-operative treatment need a subsequent re-operation through a THA. This latter could be extremely difficult, because of poor bone quality, acetabular mal union/non-union, bone gaps and hardware retention. However, the outcomes of each of the proposed treatment are mostly poor and controverted; therefore, a comprehensive patient evaluation and an accurate fracture description are required to appropriately manage acetabular fracture in the elderly.

What's New in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures

The incidence of acetabular fractures in the geriatric population is growing, yet the optimal treatment algorithm remains a controversial topic among orthopaedic surgeons. This review highlights key studies published over the past 5 years on the outcomes of various treatment options for geriatric acetabular fractures. Topics include surgical timing, mortality and risk factors, nonoperative treatment, open reduction internal fixation, and acute total hip arthroplasty.

Finite element analysis of the Union Plate in treating elderly acetabular fracture patients

BACKGROUND

Elderly acetabular fractures are one of the more difficult types of fractures to resolve. For patients at this age, the more common type of fracture is comminuted. How to better fix this type of fracture has always been an issue of concern. This study was performed to observe the mechanical properties of different internal fixation methods used in treating elderly acetabular fracture patients.

METHODS

A model of a comminuted acetabular fracture in osteoporosis was established, consisting of an anterior column-posterior hemitransverse fracture with disruption of the quadrilateral surface. Fixation of the acetabular fracture model using a reconstruction plate and Union Plates was simulated. For the different internal fixation methods, static and transient modal analyses were performed under different loads, with an action time of 0.21 s and an analysis time of 0.7 s. The stress of the model was observed in the static analysis, and the displacement of the nodes and the entire model in the U1 direction was observed in the transient modal analysis.

RESULTS

In the static analysis, the stress of the osteoporosis model, the suprapectineal pelvic reconstruction plate model, the infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate model, and the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate model were 42.62 MPa, 37.49 MPa, 44.39 MPa, and 46.15 MPa, respectively. The stress was mainly distributed near the suprapubic branch. The corresponding displacement in the U1 direction was 0.1500 mm, 0.1020 mm, 0.0836 mm, and 0.0990 mm, respectively. In the transient modal analysis, there was a significant difference in displacement between the different models (P < 0.05). When different loads were applied with the same fixation method, there was no significant difference in model displacement (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Static and transient modal analyses show that the infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate or the suprapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate has an advantage in maintaining the stability of fracture fragments when fixing comminuted acetabular fractures in elderly individuals. The infrapectineal quadrilateral surface buttress plate also presents better biomechanical results.

The acetabular roof reinforcement plate for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results in 59 patients

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation is considered the gold standard of treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in younger patients. For elderly patients with osteoporotic bone quality, however, primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the advantage of immediate postoperative mobilization might be an option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures using the acetabular roof reinforcement plate (ARRP) combined with THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2019, 84 patients were operated using the ARRP combined with THA. Inclusion criteria were displaced osteoporotic fractures of the acetabulum with or without previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, age above 65 years, and pre-injury ability to walk at least with use of a walking frame. Of the 84 patients, 59 could be followed up after 6 months clinically and radiographically. Forty-nine (83%) were primary fractures and 10 (17%) periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

RESULTS

The mean age was 80.5 years (range 65-98 years). The average time from injury to surgery was 8.5 days (range 1-28). Mean time of surgery was 167 min (range 100-303 min). Immediate postoperative full weight bearing (FWB) was allowed for 51 patients (86%). At the 6-month follow-up, all 59 patients except one showed bony healing and incorporation of the ARRP. One case developed a non-union of the anterior column. No disruption, breakage or loosening of the ARRP was seen. Additional CT scans performed in 18 patients confirmed bony healing. Twenty-six patients (44%) had regained their pre-injury level of mobility. Complications requiring revision surgery occurred in 8 patients. Five of them were suffering from a prosthetic head dislocation, one from infection, one from hematoma and one from a heterotopic ossification.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARRP has proven to provide sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate FWB in most cases and represents a valuable option for the surgical management of displaced acetabular fractures in this challenging patient group.

Risk of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Fixation: The Importance of Age

BACKGROUND

Geriatric patients are the most rapidly growing cohort of patients sustaining acetabular fractures (AFs). The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of a secondary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in older patients (>60 year old) with a prior AF open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) compared with younger patients (<60 year old) with an AF ORIF on a large population level.

METHODS

Using administrative health care data from 1996 to 2010 inclusive of all 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, all adult patients with an AF ORIF and a minimum of two year follow-up were identified and included. The risk of THA was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for patient risk factors. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1725 patients had an AF ORIF; 1452 (84.2%, mean age of 38.3 ± 12.1 years) aged <60 years ("younger") and 273 (15.8%, mean age of 69.9 ± 7.8 years) > 60 years ("older"). The mean (SD) follow-up time for all patients was 6.9 (4.2) years. In older patients, 19.4% (53 of 273) went on to receive a secondary THA with a median time to event of 3.9 years, compared with 12.9% (187 of 1452) in the younger patient cohort with a median time of 6.9 years (HR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.3). As expected, older patients had a higher 90-day mortality rate compared with younger patients (7.7% vs. 0.7%, respectively; HR 9.2, 95% CI: 4.3-19.9; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with an AF ORIF are at a significantly higher risk for a secondary THA than younger patients with an AF ORIF.

Acetabular fractures in the elderly: modern challenges and the role of conservative management

Introduction 

The incidence of acetabular fractures in the elderly population is ever increasing. While management of acetabular fractures in young patients following high-energy trauma is well described, treatment of the elderly patient subgroup is complex and requires a unique, individualized approach. A variety of treatment strategies including operative and non-operative approaches exists to manage this vulnerable patient group. Conservative management of acetabular fractures in the elderly continues to play an important role in treatment of both stable fracture patterns and those medically unfit for surgery.

Aim 

This review assessing the current literature was undertaken with the purpose of summarising the challenges of management in this at-risk cohort as well as quantifying the role and outcomes following conservative management in the elderly.

 Conclusion

Our recommendation is that conservative management of acetabular fractures in the elderly can be considered as a treatment option on a case-by-case basis accounting for patient, injury, and surgical factors. If it is to be pursued, we advise a multidisciplinary approach focused on early mobility, minimisation of risk and regular follow-up to optimise patient outcomes.

Management of acetabular fractures in elderly patients

Management of acetabular fractures in elderly patients is challenging. The challenges arise due to associated medical comorbidities, poor bone quality and comminution. There are multiple modalities of treatment. the exact algorithms or treatment remain undefined. Treatment is still based on experience and some available evidence. The options include conservative treatment, percutaneous fixation, open reduction internal fixation and the acute fix and replace procedure. There is a well recognised risk of each treatment option. We present a narrative review of the relevant available evidence and our treatment principles based on experience from a regional tertiary pelvic-acetabular fracture service.

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Self-reported Outcomes After Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum: Lessons Learned From a Hispanic Population

Introduction:

Demographic and socioeconomic factors are important determinants that may affect patient self-reported outcomes after acetabular fracture surgery. Hispanics, as a minority group, have an increased tendency to suffer demographic and socioeconomic disparities. At the present time, there is scant information regarding their role among Hispanic patients with acetabular fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether demographic or socioeconomic factors would affect satisfaction and self-reported functional outcomes in Hispanic patients who endured open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study of 78 patients with posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum treated with ORIF from 2011 to 2017 was performed. Data from demographics (age, sex, and body mass index [BMI]) and socioeconomic factors (household income, highest educational level achieved, employment status, type of medical insurance, workers' compensation involvement, and injury-related litigation process) were obtained and compared with the Short Musculoskeletal Form Assessment-46 (SMFA-46) questionnaire using a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results:

Unemployment was the most significant variable associated with dissatisfaction among 15 of the 46 responses of the SMFA-46 (P < 0.048). Patients who had an overweight or obese BMI and had an age of 41 years or older exhibited significantly worse outcomes in 7 of the 46 questions (P < 0.049). Finally, women were less likely to be satisfied in 1 of the 46 questions (P = 0.028). No notable difference was observed in any of the SMFA-46 responses regarding insurance plan, educational level, workers' compensation involvement, and injury-related litigation process.

Discussion:

A strong association exists between dissatisfaction after ORIF of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum and employment status, BMI, and age among the Hispanic population. Addressing socioeconomic factors can be critical to overcome dissatisfaction and improve functional status among Hispanic patients with acetabular fractures.

Mortality Rate of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures Is High Compared With Hip Fractures. A Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Compare acute complication and mortality rates of geriatric patients with acetabular fractures (AFs) matched to hip fractures (HFs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.

PATIENTS

Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project registry was used to identify all patients ≥60 years from 2011 to 2016 treated for AFs undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and HFs (undergoing ORIF, hemiarthroplasty, or cephalomedullary nail).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patient characteristics, comorbidities, functional status, acute complications, and mortality rates were recorded. Patients were matched 1:5 (AF:HF). Chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare groups, and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the risk of complications or death while adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 303 AF patients (age: 78.2 ± 9.2 years/59.7% females/27.1% wall, 28.4% one column and 45.2% 2 columns ORIF) were matched to 1511 HF patients (age: 78.3 ± 9.1 years/60.2% females/37.2% hemiarthroplasty, 16.3% ORIF and 47.4% cephalomedullary nail). Length of stay (8.4 ± 7.1 vs. 6.4 ± 5.9 days) and time to surgery [(TS) 2.3 ± 1.8 versus 1.2 ± 1.4 days] were longer in the AF group (P < 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were nonsignificantly higher for AFs versus HFs (6.6% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.14). After covariable adjustment, the risk of mortality was significantly higher for AFs versus HFs (odds ratio: 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-3.35).

CONCLUSION

Geriatric AFs pose a significantly higher adjusted mortality risk when compared with HF patients. Strategies to mitigate risk factors in this population are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Operative versus non-operative treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Acetabular fracture treatments in elderly patients are not well codified.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine if, for active elderly patients, the clinical results after surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures are better than for non-operative treatment.

METHODS

All active patients over 60 years with a Parker score higher than 6, managed for displaced acetabular fracture between 2005 and 2014, were included in this single-center retrospective study. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the therapeutic option (operative or non-operative) and the fracture pattern (anterior fracture that requires open reduction and internal fixation or posterior fracture that requires total hip arthroplasty).

RESULTS

Among the 82 patients with Parker score higher than 6, 44 were treated non-operatively and 38 were operated. Forty-seven had anterior fracture (AF) and 35 had posterior fracture (PF). In the AF group, the autonomy scores were better for operative than non-operative patients (p < 0.05) with a PARKER score 7.8 (7-8) versus 5.4 (1-9); ADL score 5.7 (4-6) versus 4.4 (1-6) and IADL score 7.6 (6-8) versus 4.2 (0-8). In the PF group, the autonomy scores were better for operative than non-operative patients (p < 0.05) with a PARKER score 7.3 (4-9) versus 5.6 (2-9), ADL score 5.3 (2-6) versus 4.4 (1-6) and IADL score 5.6 (2-8) versus 4.1 (1-7). Regarding clinical outcomes, the HARRIS and PMA scores were better for operative patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment in elderly patients with displaced acetabular fractures is associated with better clinical outcomes than non-operative treatment when the autonomy level is comparable.

Acetabulum Cup Stability in an Early Weight-Bearing Cadaveric Model of Geriatric Posterior Wall Fractures

BACKGROUND

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been suggested for posterior wall (PW) fractures with unfavorable features in the geriatric population. There is a paucity of studies reporting on postoperative protocols for primary THA after PW fractures. The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical effect of immediate assisted weight-bearing on acetabulum THA cup fixation in an osteoporotic PW fracture model.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 18 geriatric PW fractures (mean age, 77 ± 8 years) were used to generate representative PW fracture. This fracture pattern, comprising 50% of the PW and 25% of the acetabulum rim, was then created in 6 female cadaveric pelves. A multihole acetabulum THA cup was implanted with line-to-line reaming and fixed with four 5-mm screws. The pelves were cyclically loaded to up to 1.8× body weight (BW) in the intact form, after fracture creation and fracture fixation. Optical markers were used to determine acceptable cup motion of less than 150 μm.

RESULTS

Five specimens withstood 3.6× BW loading after implantation and before fracture creation. At 1.8× BW load, cup motion was nonfractured: 50 ± 24 µm (range, 5-128 µm), fractured with no fixation: 37 ± 22 µm (range, 8-74 µm), or fractured with fixation: 62 ± 39 µm (range, 5-120 µm) (P = 0.0097). Cup motion was <150 µm for all groups.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the practice of allowing immediate assisted weight-bearing in patients undergoing THA with PW fractures involving up to 50% of the PW and up to 25% of the acetabular rim, with or without fixation of the PW fragment.

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation. There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.

Acetabular Fracture Resulting from a Basketball Cutting Movement in a Young Adult Male: A Case Report

CASE

We present the case of a 26-year-old man who sustained a right transverse-posterior wall acetabular fracture while performing a cutting movement playing basketball.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular fracture after a relatively low-energy injury in a healthy young adult male is an extremely unusual event. The cutting movement to the right likely forcefully placed the right hip in flexion, adduction, and internal rotation directing the femoral head into the posterior wall. The patient had excellent clinical and radiographic results after acetabular open reduction and internal fixation.