Management of Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture Nonunions

Trends and Complications of Hip Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Orthopaedic Surgeons: An Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database

Background

Hip fractures are a major public health concern with a high mortality rate. Numerous risk factors for hip fracture have been identified, and efforts made to reduce complications and improve outcomes. This study aimed to assess recent trends in postoperative complications amongst early-career orthopaedic surgeons.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed surgical cases submitted to the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) for the Part II Oral Examination from 2013 to 2022. The database includes patient demographics and medical and surgical complications. Current Procedural Terminology codes reflecting operative fixation for hip fracture were selected. Data was split into two cohorts: 2013-2016 and 2017-2020. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant differences between cohorts.

Results

49,418 cases were analyzed. Compared to 2013-2016, 2017-2020 had a reduction in the overall medical complication rate (-1.49%, P = 0.0005), saw slight increases in congestive heart failure (+0.18%, P = 0.049), renal failure (+0.37%, P = 0.004), hypotension (+0.41%, P = 0.0007), and hypoxia (+0.41%, P = 0.0016). Minor decreases in myocardial infarction (-0.18%, P = 0.047) and pneumonia (-0.34%, P = 0.021) were noted. No differences occurred in confusion/delirium, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and mortality. There were no significant differences in overall surgical complications. The 90-day readmission rate increased with time (+1.17%, P < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified a decrease in the likelihood of overall medical complications (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.92 [0.89, 0.96]; P < 0.0001). Decreases were noted for the likelihood of myocardial infarction (OR: 0.81 [0.68, 0.98]; P = 0.031), pneumonia (OR: 0.87 [0.78, 0.97]; P = 0.013), fracture (OR: 0.80 [0.69, 0.92]; P = 0.002), and recurrent/persistent/uncontrolled pain (OR: 0.72 [0.56, 0.92]; P = 0.008). The likelihood of renal failure (OR: 1.18 [1.04, 1.34]; P = 0.009) and readmission increased (OR: 1.14 [1.07, 1.20]; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This study found little change in postoperative complication patterns over the past decade. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to improve hip fracture care and outcomes.

Cephalomedullary Nails for Isolated Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Age-Related Variations in Fracture Pattern and Perioperative Factors Do Not Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Introduction

There is scarce data in literature on the demographics, treatment, and outcomes of subtrochanteric femur fracture patients. This study evaluated the effect of age on injury details, perioperative and hospital parameters, and outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation.

Methods

An IRB-approved review of a consecutive series of subtrochanteric femoral fractures was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were examined to confirm patients were operatively treated for an AO/OTA Type 32A, B or C subtrochanteric femur fracture, as well as for demographics, injury information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into younger (Y) (< 65 years old) and older (O) (≥ 65 years old) cohorts. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts.

Results

Of 205 patients, 161 (78.5%) comprised the O cohort and 44 (21.5%) the Y cohort. The O cohort represented a sicker (higher CCI and ASA), less ambulatory population. Patients in the Y cohort sustained more high-energy injuries (p < 0.001). The most common fracture pattern was type 32A in both cohorts (p = 0.003). Older patients were treated more frequently with a 1-screw nail design (p = 0.005). The Y cohort had a shorter time to surgery (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be discharged home (p < 0.001). There were no differences in post-op complications, readmission or mortality rates, nonunion, fixation failure, or radiographic time to healing between cohorts.

Conclusion

Younger patients present with different subtrochanteric fracture patterns and discharge profiles than older patients and are treated with different implants. However, despite these differences, younger and older patients have similar radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

III.

Use of medialized trochanteric-entry intramedullary nail to improve alignment in proximal femur nonunions

PURPOSE

Proximal femur shaft nonunion is a challenging problem, often occurring after malreduction that results in postoperative malalignment and decreased healing potential. Correction of malalignment is critical to achieving osseous union. Here we present a novel technique for treating proximal femur nonunions with varus malalignment using an intramedullary nail inserted through a medialized trochanteric entry point.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a proximal femur shaft (subtrochanteric or proximal third shaft) nonunion operation at a single level 1 academic referral centre by two attending surgeons between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2022 were identified. Radiographic imaging was reviewed to determine initial fracture classification and calculation of coronal plane alignment (CPA), which was measured on preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs. Postoperative complications, reoperations, infections, and osseous union were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 49.9 years (66% male) were identified. Mean preoperative CPA was 125.6 degrees, immediate postoperative mean CPA was 132.6 degrees, and mean final follow-up CPA was 131.5 degrees. Mean change in CPA from immediate postoperative films to final follow-up was a decrease of 0.4 degrees. 17 patients had follow up for a minimum of 12 months or until osseous union, and all achieved union without any major complications.

CONCLUSION

Exchange nailing with an antegrade trochanteric entry nail through a medialized trochanteric starting point is a safe and effective technique in the treatment of proximal femur nonunions. This technique results in improved postoperative alignment that is sustained throughout the postoperative course, and may lead to increased rates of osseous union.

Salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in the elderly: revision internal fixation or hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare reoperation rate and clinical outcomes between revision open reduction and internal fixation and hip arthroplasty following failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients > 50 years old treated for failed fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty from 2003 to 2023. Primary outcomes included rate of fracture union and reoperations after initial salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included complications (infection, dislocation, bursitis, implant prominence, implant failure, nonunion), pain, and gait-aid requirements by final follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were identified: 34 treated with revision ORIF and 10 with hip arthroplasty. The arthroplasty cohort was older (75.4 vs. 66.0 years, p = 0.016) but did not differ from the ORIF cohort in sex, type of initial fixation, or reason for fixation failure. Patients treated with revision ORIF and patients treated with arthroplasty had similar rates of fracture union (85.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.772) and reoperation (35.3% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.710). There was no significant difference in rate of additional complications not requiring reoperation (0.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.071). The arthroplasty cohort achieved full weightbearing in significantly shorter time than the revision ORIF cohort (3.8 vs. 6.8 weeks, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Both revision ORIF and hip arthroplasty are acceptable options for salvage of failed subtrochanteric fracture fixation in patients greater than 50 years old, but patients should be counseled that although the rate of fracture union is high whether revision ORIF or hip arthroplasty is selected, the rate of reoperation can exceed 1-in-4 patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 : Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Is immediate weight bearing safe for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated by cephalomedullary nailing? A multicentric study in one hundred eighty-two patients

PURPOSE

Biomechanical superiority of intramedullary nails over extramedullary implants has been proved for subtrochanteric fractures. Nevertheless, postoperative management of these patients has not changed, with high rates of protected weight-bearing after intramedullary nailing. The purpose of this study is to determine the mechanical complications of immediate postoperative full weigh-bearing for subtrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series study from patients treated with a cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31A.3 and 32A-32C) over a nine-year period. Patients in the immediate full weight-bearing (IFWB) group received orders for immediate full weight bear as tolerated on postoperative 48 h. Patients in the non- or limited- weight-bearing (NLWB) group received orders not to full weight bear in the immediate postoperative.

RESULTS

There were five (2.7%) cases of implant failure including four cutouts and one nail breakage that needed a reoperation. Of them, one (2.2%) followed the NLWB protocol and four (2.9%) followed the IFWB protocol. Mean length of stay was 7.9 days (median 8, range 3-21) in the NLWB group and 10.7 days (median 8, range 2-60) in the IWBAT group. The NLWB group observed a 2.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay when compared to the IFWB, but the median remained equal.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that geriatric patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nailing and in which a good fracture reduction was achieved, may be able to tolerate immediate postoperative full weight-bearing, not increasing reoperation rates due to implant failure.

Principles of Minimally Invasive Reduction and Nail Fixation for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Subtrochanteric femur fractures have a reputation as difficult orthopaedic injuries to treat. Strong deforming forces, including the hip musculature and high physiologic forces, must be counteracted to obtain and maintain reduction. Adding to the complexity is a wide variety of fracture morphologies that must be recognized to execute an appropriate surgical plan. The challenging nature of this injury is demonstrated by nonunion rates of 4% to 5%, but some series have reports of up to 15% and malunion rates of 10% to 15%. Improved outcomes have been shown to be dependent on appropriate reduction and stable fixation, which can be achieved with less surgical insult. The treating surgeon must have a thorough understanding of the injury characteristics and reduction techniques to appropriately execute minimally invasive techniques for these difficult fractures.

Teriparatide: an innovative and promising strategy for protecting the blood-spinal cord barrier following spinal cord injury

The blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) is disrupted within minutes of spinal cord injury, leading to increased permeability and secondary spinal cord injury, resulting in more severe neurological damage. The preservation of blood-spinal cord barrier following spinal cord injury plays a crucial role in determining the prognosis. Teriparatide, widely used in clinical treatment for osteoporosis and promoting fracture healing, has been found in our previous study to have the effect of inhibiting the expression of MMP9 and alleviating blood-brain barrier disruption after ischemic stroke, thereby improving neurological damage symptoms. However, there are limited research on whether it has the potential to improve the prognosis of spinal cord injury. This article summarizes the main pathological mechanisms of blood-spinal cord barrier disruption after spinal cord injury and its relationship with Teriparatide, and explores the therapeutic potential of Teriparatide in improving the prognosis of spinal cord injury by reducing blood-spinal cord barrier disruption.

Subtrochanteric nonunion after intramedullary nailing due to pathological fracture: proximal femoral replacement as a salvage approach

PURPOSE

To assess proximal femoral replacement as a treatment solution for nonunion of pathologic subtrochanteric fractures after cephalomedullary nailing in patients with pathological fracture and previously irradiated bone.

METHODS

Retrospective review of five patients with pathological subtrochanteric femoral fractures that were treated with cephalomedullary nailing and developed a nonunion, which was revised with conversion to a proximal endoprosthetic replacement.

RESULTS

All five patients had previously been treated with radiation. One patient had the latest follow-up at 2 months postoperatively. At that time, the patient was walking with a walker for assistance, with no evidence of hardware failure or loosening on imaging. The remaining four patients had the latest follow-up ranging from 9 to 20 months after surgery. At their latest follow-up, three of the four patients were ambulatory with no pain, using only a cane for assistance with longer distances. The other patient demonstrated pain in his affected thigh, utilizing a walker for assistance with ambulation at latest follow-up, but not requiring further surgical interventions. There were no hardware failures or implant loosening through the follow-up period. None of the patients required revision, and there were no postoperative complications observed at their last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pathological fractures in the subtrochanteric region that is treated with cephalomedullary nailing and developed a nonunion, treatment with conversion to a proximal femoral replacement with a mega prosthesis is a valuable treatment with good functional results and low risk for complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV.

Lateral cortical notching facilitates dynamization of proximal femoral nailing - A finite element analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dynamization of proximal femoral nailing by removal of distal interlocking is one of the recommended treatment options for nonunions of femur fractures. However, in certain inter-/subtrochanteric fractures, gliding of the nail along the femoral shaft is blocked by lateral femoral cortical support of the lag screw. For these cases, Biber et al. proposed lateral cortical notching (LCN), in which the supporting lateral bone is removed. This study investigates the biomechanical effect of LCN on gliding of proximal femoral nailing and stress distribution at the bone/implant interface.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this finite element analysis a three-dimensional model of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nailing without distal interlocking was simulated using the FebioStudio software suite. To simulate LCN, the lag screw hole was lengthened to 15.34 mm at the lateral cortex. Displacement of the nail along the femoral shaft axis and von Mises stress distribution were compared between LCN model and standard implantation model.

RESULTS

Displacement of the nail along the femoral shaft axis was higher in the LCN model than in the standard implantation model (0.48 mm vs. 0.07 mm). Highest von Mises stresses of 176-178 MPa at the implant and of 52-81 MPa at the proximal femur were detected. Maximum von Mises stresses of the implant were comparable at all sides, except for a reduced von Mises stress at the lateral inferior side in the LCN model (80 vs. 102 MPa). At the inferior lateral screw hole and the anterior/posterior lateral screw hole maximum von Mises stress was reduced in the LCN model (2 vs. 49 MPa and 52 vs. 81 MPa), whereas the maximum von Mises stress at the inferior medial screw hole was higher in the LCN model than in the standard implantation model (53 vs. 27 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral cortical notching facilitates gliding of a distally dynamized proximal femoral nail along the femoral shaft axis in intertrochanteric fractures. Additionally, the lack of lateral cortical bone support at the lag screw reduces von Mises stress at the bone/implant interface and thus could lower the risk for implant breakage and peri‑implant fractures.

Pertrochanteric Nonunion: When and Why to Consider a Medullary Implant

SUMMARY

Pertrochanteric nonunion management is a technically challenging problem. When repair is undertaken rather than conversion arthroplasty, successful treatment revolves around accurate deformity correction, preservation of vascularity, and stable durable fixation. The decision to use an extramedullary or intramedullary implant should be influenced by nonunion-specific characteristics and patient-related conditions. Failure to understand these nuances when selecting an implant strategy often results in treatment failure. The primary purpose of this article was to discuss these variables and delineate when an intramedullary implant should be considered for treatment of a pertrochanteric nonunion. The secondary purpose was to describe the author's preferred surgical technique for implant-driven deformity correction and compression when choosing an intramedullary nail.

Augmentative Plating versus Exchange Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Aseptic Non-Unions of the Femoral Shaft-A Biomechanical Study in a SawboneTM Model

BACKGROUND

Non-unions after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures are a significant problem. Treatment options such as augmenting with plates or exchange nailing have been proposed. The ideal treatment remains controversial.

METHODS

Augmentative plating using a 4.5 mm LCP or a 3.2 mm LCP leaving the nail in situ was tested biomechanically and compared to exchange intramedullary nailing in a Sawbone^TM model of a femoral shaft non-union.

RESULTS

The difference of fracture gap motion in axial testing was small. In rotational testing, the exchange nail allowed for the largest amount of motion. The 4.5 mm augmentative plate was the most stable construct in all loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentative plating using a 4.5 mm LCP plate while leaving the nail in situ is biomechanically superior to exchange intramedullary nailing. A small fragment 3.2 mm LCP is undersized and does not reduce fracture motion sufficiently in a femoral shaft non-union.

The effect of cerclage wiring with intramedullary nail surgery in proximal femoral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of cerclage wiring with intramedullary nail surgery in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that evaluated the impact of cerclage wiring on proximal femoral fractures published up to September 20, 2021. Pooled analysis identified differences in the (1) fracture healing profile, (2) perioperative variables, (3) complications, and (4) clinical outcome score between cerclage wiring and non-cerclage wiring.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 1,718 patients with proximal femoral fractures who underwent cephalomedullary nailing surgeries were included. The pooled analysis revealed a longer fracture union time in the non-cerclage wiring group than in the cerclage wiring group (mean difference [MD] = - 1.03 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 1.47 to - 0.59; P < 0.001), and there was no difference in the nonunion rate. The operation time was longer in the cerclage wiring group (MD = 14.32 min; 95% CI: 6.42-22.22; P < 0.001), but there were no differences in blood loss and the rate of poor quality of reduction. Superficial and deep infection rates showed no difference between the groups, and the readmission rate also showed no difference. The cerclage wiring group had a higher Harris hip score than the non-cerclage wiring group (MD = 2.13; 95% CI: 0.77-3.49; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing with cerclage wiring is considered a useful treatment method for proximal femoral fractures. It enables anatomic reduction and stable fixation, thereby reducing union time and facilitating rapid functional recovery.

Finite Element Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System as Prophylactic Fixation to Prevent Contralateral Hip Fractures

Introduction

Hip fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality for geriatric patients, and incidence is increasing as the population ages. Following a primary hip fracture, up to 20% may suffer a contralateral hip fracture within 5 years despite fracture risk reduction measures, including fall prevention and osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. The aim of this study is to assess whether insertion of the Femoral Neck System (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA) into the contralateral proximal femur may strengthen the bone and decrease the incidence of contralateral hip fractures.

Materials and Methods

ScanIP, an image processing software was used to produce 3-dimensional models of a cadaver femur with the implanted device. Models were meshed and exported to Abaqus for finite element analysis to evaluate the device’s ability to reduce stress in the proximal femur. Results were analyzed for element-wise volume and von-Mises stresses.

Results

The implant reduced peak stress and bone failure at all levels of bone quality. Specifically in osteoporotic bone, the implant decreased peak stress by 27%, proximal femur trabecular bone failure by 5% and cortical bone failure by 100% in the femoral neck.

Conclusions

Our results from computer generated finite element analyses indicate that the Femoral Neck System may strengthen an osteoporotic proximal femur in the event of a lateral fall. Further investigation with expanded finite element analysis and cadaveric biomechanical studies are needed to validate these results.

Exchange nailing and medial wall reconstruction following implant failure in a subtrochanteric femoral fracture

Failure of fixation of subtrochanteric fractures has been reported in as high as 20% of cases. Several associations have been suggested to contribute to failed fixation. Discontinuity of the medial wall/column is considered to be one of the most significant risk factors for non-union and subsequent implant failure, especially if this defect is not addressed during the revision surgery. We present a case of failed fixation of a subtrochanteric fracture in an 86-year-old female where revision surgery paid special attention to restoring the medial wall continuity via bone grafting resulting in satisfactory union of the fracture. We advocate the necessity of reconstructing the medial column in similar cases in order to enhance healing and restore the biomechanical support of the subtrochanteric region.

Results of revision intramedullary nailing with and without auxillary plate in aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric nonunion

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to investigate whether limited open auxiliary angle stable plate fixation has an effect on functional and radiologic outcomes one year after revision intramedullary nailing in aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture nonunion.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, surgically revised aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric nonunion was evaluated in a total of 190 consecutive patients ranging from 18 to 94 years between 12/2005 and 10/2018.

RESULTS

One year after revision intramedullary nailing, nonunion healing was assessed in 129 out of 136 patients (95%) in group 1 without auxiliary plate fixation and in 51 out of 54 patients (94%) in group 2 with auxiliary plating (p = 0.23). In group 1, range of motion (ROM) was unrestricted in 88 patients and still restricted in 48 patients. In group 2, ROM was free in 34 patients and restricted in 20 patients (p = 0.25). The mean Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) was 56 points in group 1 and 55 points in group 2 (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

This study did not demonstrate significant differences in functional and radiologic outcomes following revision intramedullary nailing of aseptic trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture nonunion. Limited open auxiliary plate fixation might be a reasonable option especially in cases of relevant varus axis deviation and comminuted or atypical fracture configurations, regardless of patients' age. Retrospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (01/25/2021; ID: DRKS00024112).