Comparison of Surgical Site Infection Risk Between Warfarin, LMWH, and Aspirin for Venous Thromboprophylaxis in TKA or THA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative concepts to prevent infection for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication that occurs in less than 1% of patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Though infrequent, it may potentially lead to revision while placing a significant financial burden on the healthcare system. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative strategies should be implemented to minimize the risk of PJI. Patient optimization prior to surgery can help to identify patients at risk for PJI and also maximize the health of the patient prior to surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative strategies can also mitigate the risk of postoperative infection. This article will summarize the evidence for preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative strategies to prevent PJI in UKA. This will include topics on malnutrition and obesity, Staphylococcus aureus, smoking, human immunodeficiency virus, rheumatoid arthritis, as well as skin preparation, laminar air flow, preoperative antibiotic administration antimicrobial incision drapes, pulsatile lavage, vancomycin powder, wound closure method, thromboprophylactic agents, and closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings.

Interatrial Wall Abnormality is Associated with Adverse Same-Admission Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common joint arthroplasty procedure and is shown to be a reliable and efficacious way to improve quality of life. Individuals with interatrial wall abnormalities (IAWAs), such as atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale (PFO), are at increased baseline risk for stroke and overall lifetime morbidity. The purpose of our study was to elucidate the association between IAWAs and perioperative TKA outcomes.We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. Admissions for TKA between 2010 and 2019 were identified using the international classification of disease (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 procedure codes. Patients with ICD-9-clinical modification (CM) diagnosis code 7455 or ICD-10-CM diagnosis code Q211 were assigned to the IAWA cohort, the primary exposure. Confounding variables included basic demographics, baseline health status, and surgical facility characteristics. The primary outcomes studied were medical complications, implant-related complications, and admission mortality. Univariate and adjusted multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations.Compared to patients in the non-IAWA cohort, those in the IAWA cohort had significant risks for same-admission medical complications (odds ratio [OR] 5.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.59-7.15; p < 0.001), implant-related complications (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.09-2.12; p = 0.009), stroke (OR 77.46, 95% CI 58.4-101.2; p < 0.001), venous thromboembolism (VTE; OR 3.78 95% CI 2.47-5.51; p < 0.001), and mortality (OR 8.36, 95% CI 3.54-16.52; p < 0.001) following TKA.Compared to patients without IAWAs, those with IAWAs who undergo TKA have higher risks for same-admission medical and implant-related complications as well as same-admission mortality. Similarly, these patients have higher risks for same-admission stroke and VTE. Further research on perioperative TKA management in patients with IAWAs is needed.Level of Evidence is III: retrospective cohort study.

Advances and current research in primary thromboprophylaxis to prevent hospital-associated venous thromboembolism

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is defined as any case of VTE occurring during hospital admission and for up to 90 days post discharge. It accounts for over 50% of all cases of VTE internationally; indeed, there are an estimated 10 million cases of hospital-associated VTE annually. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in improving VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis. This review summarises all the recent and ongoing major research studies and future challenges in the different areas, including medical, surgical and obstetric patients, as well as special areas such as lower limb immobilisation. We include sections on both pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis.

Prophylactic use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site occurrences in general surgery: Consensus document

BACKGROUND

Surgical site occurrences pose a threat to patient health, potentially resulting in significant increases in health care spending caused by using additional resources. The objective of this study was to reach a consensus among a group of experts in incisional negative pressure wound therapy to determine the indications for using this type of treatment prophylactically and to analyze the associated risk factors of surgical site occurrences in abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A group of experts in incisional negative pressure wound therapy from Spain and Portugal was formed among general surgery specialists who frequently perform colorectal, esophagogastric, or abdominal wall surgery. The Coordinating Committee performed a bibliographic search to identify the most relevant publications and to create a summary table to serve as a decision-making protocol regarding the use of prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy based on factors related to the patient and type of procedure.

RESULTS

The patient risk factors associated with surgical site occurrence development such as age, immunosuppression, anticoagulation, hypoalbuminemia, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes, obesity, and malnutrition were analyzed. For surgical procedure factors, surgical time, repeated surgeries, organ transplantation, need for blood transfusion, complex abdominal wall reconstruction, surgery at a contaminated site, open abdomen closure, emergency surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were analyzed.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, this consensus has been achieved on a tailored set of recommendations on patient and surgical aspects that should be considered to reduce the risk of surgical site occurrences with the use of prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy, particularly in areas where the evidence base is controversial or lacking.

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis as a risk factor for early periprosthetic joint infection following primary total joint arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been suggested for patients who underwent total join arthroplasty (TJA). However, the morbidity of surgical site complications (SSC) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been well evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of VTE prophylaxis on the risk of early postoperative SSC and PJI in a Taiwanese population. We retrospectively reviewed 7511 patients who underwent primary TJA performed by a single surgeon from 2010 through 2019. We evaluated the rates of SSC and PJI in the early postoperative period (30-day, 90-day) as well as 1-year reoperations. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify possible risk factors associated with SSC and PJI, including age, sex, WHO classification of weight status, smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM), rheumatoid arthritis(RA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), history of VTE, presence of varicose veins, total knee or hip arthroplasty procedure, unilateral or bilateral procedure, or receiving VTE prophylaxis or blood transfusion. The overall 90-day rates of SSC and PJI were 1.1% (N = 80) and 0.2% (N = 16). VTE prophylaxis was a risk factor for 90-day readmission for SSC (aOR: 1.753, 95% CI 1.081-2.842), 90-day readmission for PJI (aOR: 3.267, 95% CI 1.026-10.402) and all 90-day PJI events (aOR: 3.222, 95% CI 1.200-8.656). Other risk factors included DM, underweight, obesity, bilateral TJA procedure, younger age, male sex and RA. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis appears to be a modifiable risk factor for SSC and PJI in the early postoperative period. The increased infection risk should be carefully weighed in patients who received pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.

Time to Venous Thromboembolism Events Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between Aspirin and Warfarin

BACKGROUND

The attitude and approach of orthopedic community for minimizing venous thromboembolism (VTE) has evolved over the last decade with the trend toward use of aspirin (and mechanical modalities) in lieu of aggressive anticoagulation. The optimal length of VTE prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) still remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the timing of VTE in patients who received aspirin compared to warfarin, and determine if 30 days of prophylaxis remain adequate.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 18,003 patients undergoing primary and revision THA at a single institution between January 2008 and August 2020. During this time, our institution underwent a transition from the use of warfarin to aspirin as the main method for VTE prophylaxis. Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurring within 90 days of surgery were identified from medical records and phone call logs. Aspirin and warfarin cohorts were matched to account for demographic and comorbidity differences. Timing of pulmonary embolism was determined based on either the date of diagnostic imaging or patient-provider phone calls confirming diagnosis.

RESULTS

The cohorts included 46 patients in the warfarin group and 46 in the aspirin group. Time to VTE was significantly shorter in the warfarin group compared to aspirin (P = .021) with a median time to VTE of 3 days (interquartile range 2-14) and 10 days (interquartile range 4-19) respectively. Over 90% of the events occurred within 32 or 30 days of surgery in the warfarin and aspirin groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings, a 30-day aspirin prophylaxis remains appropriate for patients undergoing THA.

Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after major orthopaedic operations, such as a total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Therefore, perioperative VTE prophylaxis is recommended; a multitude of modern options are available, including both pharmacologic (aspirin, unfractionated and lowmolecular-weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and novel oral anticoagulants) and/or mechanical interventions (early mobilization, graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression devices, and venous foot pumps). However, because of the abundance of these possibilities, it is crucial to understand the benefits and drawbacks of each VTE prophylaxis option to ensure that the optimal treatment plan is developed for each patient. The American College of Chest Physicians (AACP) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have both published individual guidelines on VTE prophylaxis regimens, alongside numerous studies evaluating the efficacy and outcomes of the different prophylaxis modalities. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the evidence on VTE prophylaxis after elective total hip and knee arthroplasty based on current guidelines and highlight the major concerns and potential complications.

Prevention of early complications following total hip replacement

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been quoted as "the operation of the century", owing to its efficacy and the substantial improvements evidenced with respect to functional patient outcomes and quality of life. However, early postoperative complications are often inevitable, hence it is imperative to take every step to prevent them and minimise morbidity and mortality. This manuscript focuses on the most common early complications following THA, namely venous thromboembolism (VTE), prosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, instability, and leg length inequality. It aims to outline effective risk stratification strategies and prevention measures that could apply to the wider Orthopaedic community.

A Web-Based Calculator for Predicting the Occurrence of Wound Complications, Wound Infection, and Unplanned Reoperation for Wound Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases

BACKGROUND

In the present study, we identified the risk factors for wound complications, wound infection, and reoperation for wound complications after spine metastasis surgery and deployed the resultant model as a web-based calculator.

METHODS

Patients treated at a single comprehensive cancer center during a 7-year period were included. The demographics, pathology, comorbidities, laboratory values, and operative details were collected. Factors with P < 0.15 on univariable regression were entered into multivariable logistic regression to generate predictive models internally validated using 1000 bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS

Of the 330 patients included, 29 (7.6%) had experienced a surgical site infection. The independent predictive factors for wound-related complications were a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; odds ratio [OR], 1.41 per point; P < 0.01), Karnofsky performance scale score ≤70 (OR, 2.14; P = 0.04), lower platelet count (OR, 0.49 per 10⁵/μL; P < 0.01), revision versus index surgery (OR, 3.10; P = 0.02), and increased incision length (OR, 1.21 per level; P = 0.02). Wound infection was associated with a higher CCI (OR, 1.60 per point; P < 0.01), a lower platelet count (OR, 0.35 per 10⁵/μL; P < 0.01), revision surgery (OR, 4.63; P = 0.01), and a longer incision length (OR, 1.25 per level; P = 0.03). Unplanned reoperation for wound complications was predicted by a higher CCI (OR, 1.39 per point; P = 0.003), prior irradiation (OR, 2.52; P = 0.04), a lower platelet count (OR, 0.57 per 10⁵/μL; P = 0.02), and revision surgery (OR, 3.34; P = 0.03), The optimism-corrected areas under the curve were 0.75, 0.81, and 0.72 for the wound complication, infection, and reoperation models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Low platelet counts, poorer health status, more invasive surgery, and revision surgery all independently predicted the risk of wound complications, including infection and unplanned reoperation for infection. Validation of the calculators in a prospective study is merited.