Role of the Sea Urchin Stomopneustes variolaris (Lamarck, 1816) Pits as a Habitat for Epilithic Macroinvertebrates on a Tropical Intertidal Rocky Shore

Effects of Rock Type and Food Availability on Bioerosion by the Purple Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus

Purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) profoundly impact nearshore rocky coasts through their feeding habits. Their intense grazing sculpts substrates through bioerosion using their teeth and spines and controls the alternative stable state dynamic between kelp bed and urchin barrens. These states have contrasting food availability for sea urchins, with abundant food in kelp beds and scarce food in barren grounds. However, the relationship between food availability and bioerosion is unknown. We predicted that when kelp is available, it would ameliorate the action of teeth on the substrate. Our 11-week long, 2 × 2 factorial experiment, crossed community state (kelp present vs absent) and rock type (sandstone vs mudstone). We also quantified the contribution of spine abrasion to bioerosion on the two rock types. The bioerosion rates did not differ between treatments with and without kelp. Although there was no significant difference in net bioerosion between the rock types, there was a large difference between the proportion of bioerosion from teeth vs spine abrasion. Approximately a third of the sandstone bioerosion was from spines whereas less than 2% of mudstone bioerosion could be attributed to spines. As anticipated, growth of sea urchins fed kelp ad-libitum was higher than food-limited sea urchins. Surprisingly, sea urchins on mudstone (which has a higher organic component) grew faster than sea urchins on sandstone. Although bioerosion rates may not differ on a per-urchin basis between community states, the sea urchin population densities between kelp beds and urchin barrens likely causes a difference in net bioerosion between these communities. Our results point to the importance of lithology on the mechanics of sea urchin bioerosion. Differences in texture, grain size, and hardness of rock substrates undoubtedly contribute to bioerosion rates and dynamics.